Re: [TSCM-L] {2861} Re: phones in the fridge from Rob Hommel on 2008-08-27 (file.mbox)

From: Rob Hommel <rho..._at_mad.scientist.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:12:11 -0500

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:24 2024
Received: by 10.214.215.18 with SMTP id n18mr685920qag.12.1222204154336;
 Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com>
Received: from smtp110.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp110.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.179])
 by mx.google.com with SMTP id 22si11515943yxr.1.2008.09.23.14.09.13;
 Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.142.201.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of pe..._at_detectiveservices.com) client-iph.142.201.179;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.142.201.179 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of pe..._at_detectiveservices.com) smtp.mail=pe..._at_detectiveservices.com
Received: (qmail 24407 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2008 21:09:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Myers12) (perry_at_detectiveservices.com_at_74.222.48.26 with login)
 by smtp110.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2008 21:09:13 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 2.dMUa0VM1nkq0zmxhYCGGRd7NrCcGKwVd4VEJYn_0bFQPT7CdB4ElFqH9FqSPsbH6tFcTUkZgXz5nIrnL6LIDdh2YlhSefMRos.yhKR9JVLh7UJyh4Q9e_l7pIAlkocv0T0LH3LRzjiTx3v.NC6zHqN6m9bmviKIEqCRwo1C87gtwLGYg--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Reply-To: <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com>
From: "Perry Myers" <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
References: <C4E44928.2F349%perry_at_detectiveservices.com> <433249.76001.qm_at_web34805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <433249.76001.qm_at_web34805.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: [TSCM-L] {2918} Re: phones in the fridge
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:09:14 -0500
Organization: MSI Detective Services
Message-ID: <065a01c91dc0$a25d2730$e7177590$_at_com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="----=_NextPart_000_065B_01C91D96.B9871F30"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ackdr/hbbHl0/VmuRqOEOuntoTHaywAD0CWA
Content-Language: en-us

------=_NextPart_000_065B_01C91D96.B9871F30
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Clarifying what happened is the following:

· Son and father talked using cell phones. 3rd party showed (did
not deliver) a transcript of conversation that appeared to be an accurate
portrayal of the conversation.

· The transcript was not left and the 3rd party will deny this in=
a
court of law. But since there is no physical evidence which we would need
to take to court, there will be no court until we get evidence.

· Father and son assumed they were recorded which as far as I kno=
w
is illegal in all states since the person who recorded was not a party to
the conversation.

· Not sure how bright the client is but they need evidence for an=
y
action. 3rd party is not in country although that part we would have
covered.

· We need help or ideas on the evidence.

· Lastly, I learned that the original phone we believe may have b=
een
compromised is lost. Any modifications to it are not traceable now so we
either need evidence from the cell phone company records if there in fact
would be any trace evidence left there or we are out of luck.

Thanks for any help in this matter.

Perry Myers, CFE

President

Myers Services, Inc. DBA

MSI Detective Services

2406 W Fullerton Ave

Chicago, IL 60647

pe..._at_detectiveservices.com

WWW.DETECTIVESERVICES.COM

(773) 404-7400 x 200

From: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com [mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marc DeRodes
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 11:26 PM
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
Subject: [TSCM-L] {2918} Re: phones in the fridge

--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Perry Myers, CFE <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com> wrote:

From: Perry Myers, CFE <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com>
Subject: [TSCM-L] {2874} Re: phones in the fridge
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 12:01 PM

I got a call today from a respected (so far) business person who said he wa=
s
shown transcripts of conversations he had on his cell phone with another
person. I won?t share the details of the reason for the alleged cell phone
intercept but it was done according to my contact. Both sides of the
conversation were recorded so this was not a simple hidden recorder in the
car. My question is, any ideas on how we can prove this happened?

If you have a written transcript, that would be a good place to start. The
person who delivered it could be forced to testify as to its origins, or
could provide information the next link in the chain.

If this was a clone, is there a place in the Cell Provider?s records that
may indicate a duplicate Cell phone ID number was linking to their system a=
t
the same time? Any little evidence may help.

 As so many others have said, recording a phone call from both sides is
simple. Not only does software exist for certain phones to record both side=
s
of a conversation, bit Radio Shack also sells a very inexpensive device tha=
t
allows virtually any cell phone to be connected to a recorder.

The other person?s cell phone that was involved in this recorded
conversation was available to the suspected perpetrators so that they could
have done anything they wanted to that phone. But my contact always had hi=
s
phone in his possession.

Your contact isn't too bright, is he or she? To tell you the truth, I doubt
that anything illegal or covert was done to this persons phone. In many
states of the US, it is perfectly legal to record conversations without
informing the person being recorded. The first thing I would check into is
the legality of such actions in the state that you reside.

Any advice of what to do to prove this through subpoena is appreciated.

Once again, the person who delivered the transcript should be questioned as
to its origins.

------=_NextPart_000_065B_01C91D96.B9871F30
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-7"=
>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<title>Re: [TSCM-L] {2862} Re: phones in the fridge</title>
<style>

</style>

</head>

<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>

<div class=Section1>

Clarifying what happened is the following:<o:p></o:p>=


<![if !supportLists]>·&=
nbsp;       
<![endif]>Son and father talked using cell phones. 3rd p=
arty
showed (did not deliver) a transcript of conversation that appeared to be a=
n
accurate portrayal of the conversation.<o:p></o:p>

<![if !supportLists]>·&=
nbsp;       
<![endif]>The transcript was not left and the 3rd party wil=
l
deny this in a court of law. But since there is no physical evidence whi=
ch we
would need to take to court, there will be no court until we get evidence.=
<o:p></o:p>

<![if !supportLists]>·&=
nbsp;       
<![endif]>Father and son assumed they were recorded which as far as I =
know
is illegal in all states since the person who recorded was not a party to t=
he
conversation.<o:p></o:p>

<![if !supportLists]>·&=
nbsp;       
<![endif]>Not sure how bright the client is but they need evidence for=
any
action. 3rd party is not in country although that part we wou=
ld
have covered. <o:p></o:p>

<![if !supportLists]>·&=
nbsp;       
<![endif]>We need help or ideas on the evidence.<o:p></o:p>

<![if !supportLists]>·&=
nbsp;       
<![endif]>Lastly, I learned that the original phone we believe may hav=
e
been compromised is lost. Any modifications to it are not traceable now =
so we
either need evidence from the cell phone company records if there in fact w=
ould
be any trace evidence left there or we are out of luck. <o:p></o:p></spa=
n>

Thanks for any help in this matter. <o:p></o:p></p=
>

<o:p> </o:p>

Perry Myers, CFE<o:p></o:p>

President<o:p></o:p>

Myers Services, Inc. DBA<o:p></o:p>

MSI Detective Services<o:p></o:p>

2406 W Fullerton Ave<o:p></o:p>

Chicago, IL 60647<o:p></o:p>

pe..._at_detectiveservices.com<o:p></o:p>

WWW.DETECTIVESERVICES.COM<o:p></o:p>

(773) 404-7400 x 200<o:p></o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

<o:p> </o:p>

<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in =
0in 0in'>

From:
TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com [mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marc DeRodes 
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 11:26 PM 
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com 
Subject: [TSCM-L] {2918} Re: phones in the fridge<o:p></o:p><=
/p>

</div>

<o:p> </o:p>

<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0>
<tr>
 <td valign=top style='padding:0in 0in 0in 0in'>
 
 
 --- On Wed, 9/3/08, Perry Myers, CFE <p..._at_detectiveservices.com=
>
 wrote:<o:p></o:p>
 From: Perry Myers, CF=
E
 <p..._at_detectiveservices.com> 
 Subject: [TSCM-L] {2874} Re: phones in the fridge 
 To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com 
 Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 12:01 PM<o:p></o:p>
 <div id=yiv1749764993>
 I
 got a call today from a respected (so far) business person who said he wa=
s
 shown transcripts of conversations he had on his cell phone with another
 person.  I won¢t
 share the details of the reason for the alleged cell phone intercept but =
it
 was done
 according to my contact.  Both sides of the conversation were record=
ed
 so this was not a simple hidden recorder in the car.  My question is=
,
 any ideas on how we can prove this happened?  
 
 
 If you have a written transcript, that would be a good place to start. Th=
e
 person who delivered it could be forced to testify as to its origins, or
 could provide information the next link in the chain. 
 
 
 If this was a clone, is there a place in the Cell Provider¢s records=
that
 may indicate a duplicate Cell phone ID number was linking to their system at t=
he
 same time?  Any little evidence may help. 
 
   As so many others have said, recording a phone call from both side=
s is
 simple. Not only does software exist for certain phones to record both si=
des
 of a conversation, bit Radio Shack also sells a very inexpensive device t=
hat
 allows virtually any cell phone to be connected to a recorder. 
 
 The other person¢s
 cell phone that was involved in this recorded conversation was available =
to
 the suspected perpetrators so that they could have done anything they want=
ed
 to that phone.  But my contact always had his phone in his
 possession.  
 
 Your contact isn't too bright, is he or she? To tell you the truth, I dou=
bt
 that anything illegal or covert was done to this persons phone. In many s=
tates
 of the US, it is perfectly legal to record conversations without informin=
g
 the person being recorded. The first thing I would check into is the lega=
lity
 of such actions in the state that you reside.  
 
 Any advice of what to do to prove this through subpoena is appreciated.&n=
bsp;
 
 
 Once again, the person who delivered the transcript should be questioned =
as
 to its origins.<o:p></o:p>
 </div>
 </td>
</tr>
</table>

 
 

</div>

</body>

</html>

------=_NextPart_000_065B_01C91D96.B9871F30--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:45 CST