>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:24 2024
Received: by 10.220.46.132 with SMTP id j4mr17030vcf.24.1247095109754;
Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <Socal..._at_aol.com>
Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com (imo-d06.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.38])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 23si544617vwj.1.2009.07.08.16.18.29;
Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of Socal..._at_aol.com designates 205.188.157.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.188.157.38;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of Socal..._at_aol.com designates 205.188.157.38 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=Socal..._at_aol.com
Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN3-44a552941345; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:18:25 -0400
Received: from Socal..._at_aol.com
by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id r.c38.5947aa74 (29288)
for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:18:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (ip70-187-179-83.oc.oc.cox.net [70.187.179.83]) by ciabeta-ma02.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILCIABETAMA022-72684a55293818a; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:18:17 -0400
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:18:17 -0700
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {3863} Re: New threat
Message-ID: <A72079FB.5ACB.46AF.AB22.43500ED1E5A3_at_aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Generated by Pantomime 1.2.0)
From: socalsweeps <socal..._at_aol.com>
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <36034F6D09914DE7ACC1492699DC732E_at_acer93dc35eaa2>
X-Mailer: Pantomime (ADM 351)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_47329099.84B1.4D4C.AF55.45C55DBDDEED_at_aol.com"
X-AOL-IP: 205.188.169.199
X-Spam-Flag:NO
--=_47329099.84B1.4D4C.AF55.45C55DBDDEED_at_aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:35:15 PM, "Fernando Martins" <fernand..._at_kanguru.pt> w=
rote:
Did you had a chance to test the pens?
http://www.advancedcameratech.com/8gbhires640x.html
The pens that I''ve seen have been gigantic and phony looking. =A0They woul=
d not pass a cursory inspection.
--=_47329099.84B1.4D4C.AF55.45C55DBDDEED_at_aol.com
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html><head></head><body name="Mail Message Editor"><br>On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:35:15 PM, "Fernando Martins" <fernan..._at_kanguru.pt> wrote:<br><blockquote style="padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left-width: 2px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: blue; color: blue; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><div><font size="2" face="Arial">Did you had a chance to test the pens?</font></div><div><font size="2" face="Arial"><a href="
http://www.advancedcameratech.com/8gbhires640x.html" title="ht
tp://www.advancedcameratech.com/8gbhires640x.html">
http://www.advancedcameratech.com/8gbhires640x.html</a></font></div></span></blockquote>The pens that I''ve seen have been gigantic and phony looking. They would not pass a cursory inspection.<br><div><br></div><div class="aol_ad_footer" id="uA72079FB5ACB46AFAB2243500ED1E5A3"></div></body></html>
--=_47329099.84B1.4D4C.AF55.45C55DBDDEED_at_aol.com--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST