Re: [TSCM-L] {6328} [Fwd: Sent at the request of a friend.]

From: High Frequency <highfrequ..._at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 21:05:29 -0500

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:25 2024
X-Received: by 10.236.173.200 with SMTP id v48mr1711369yhl.33.1362759211122;
        Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:13:31 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.50.169 with SMTP id d9ls235764qeo.85.gmail; Fri, 08 Mar
 2013 08:13:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.72.199 with SMTP id n7mr1975639qaj.5.1362759205253;
        Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:13:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.105.201 with SMTP id u9msqao;
        Fri, 8 Mar 2013 07:33:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.72.199 with SMTP id n7mr1899816qaj.5.1362756795233;
        Fri, 08 Mar 2013 07:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <d..._at_geer.org>
Received: from palinka.tinho.net (palinka.tinho.net. [166.84.6.13])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x1si1140155qci.2.2013.03.08.07.33.15;
        Fri, 08 Mar 2013 07:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 166.84.6.13 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of d..._at_geer.org) client-ip=166.84.6.13;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;
       spf=neutral (google.com: 166.84.6.13 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of d..._at_geer.org) smtp.mail=d..._at_geer.org
Received: by palinka.tinho.net (Postfix, from userid 126)
        id F15B42280A8; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:33:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palinka.tinho.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by palinka.tinho.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC0E228090
        for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:33:14 -0500 (EST)
From: d..._at_geer.org
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {6334} [Fwd: Sent at the request of a friend.]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:46:09 GMT."
             <BAY175-W17E163C5754238E46EF7BBCE60_at_phx.gbl>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:33:14 -0500
Message-Id: <20130308153314.F15B42280A8_at_palinka.tinho.net>


 | That supposed USMC battlefield missive looked facially bogus, so I
 | checked it out and it is indeed bogus:
 |
 | http://www.snopes.com/rumors/freezing.asp

Perhaps we are arguing the distinction between fact and truth...

--dan

Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:25 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:45 CST