Re: [TSCM-L] Usefullness of portable-bodyworn noisegenerators.
>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:27 2024
Received: by 10.114.150.8 with SMTP id x8mr124456wad.1173564352165;
Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-IP: 213.10.26.148
From: cont..._at_yahoo.co.uk
To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Usefullness of portable-bodyworn noisegenerators.
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:05:49 -0800
Message-ID: <1173564349.970438.55320_at_t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <54823.42605.qm_at_web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <1173497005.701862.17850_at_v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
<54823.42605.qm_at_web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Marc,
> HSS, while quite interesting, is not the same thing.
I dont see any difference...
> Remember that most objects will not resonate at Ultrasonic frequencies en=
ough to reveal the beat note(and if it did, it
> would be extremely low(as in inaudible under normal conditions)
Ok so when they donīt resonate...they will reflect...like a wall for
example
but as soon as any human being with ears gets inside the beam or a
reflected beam ..they will hear
the modulation...isnīt that what HSS demonstrates ? ...infact that is
the whole idea of HSS
So it wont work they it should because everyone in the restaurant will
hear the noise
...what is wrong with that conclusion ?
> The method I was discussing has been around for years, and has been sold =
commercially, at least for rooms.
It would be helpful if i could find anything on it...but i donīt.
Thanks again
contranl
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:27 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:46 CST