ANTI-NY TIMES HOME PAGE

Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times

___________________________________________________________________

          OCTOBER, 2016    1 FED RESERVE NOTE

___________________________________________________________________

 

"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"

*****************************************

MONDAY / OCTOBER 31, 2016

REBUTTAL BY As media-fueled anti-Killary mania sweeps the nation, Sugar and Mike, er, "The Editorial Board" of the Anti-New York Times take great delight in watching the apparent destruction of the campaign of Killary Rotten Clinscum. Nonetheless, and don't get mad at us for pissing in your election party's punchbowl, it is clear that a game is being played on us all by the dirty evil agent Julian Assange of CIA-Mossad WikiLeaks, Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press.   Assange of WikiLeaks -- who openly boasts about having triggered the bloody "Arab Spring" -- has been tasked with ruining Killary with leaks fed to him by sources unknown. Why are this evil conspiratorial monster and his secret handlers out to get Killary?   Think about it. After all these years of criminal conduct dating back to the 1980's in Arkansas, all of a sudden, just 10 days before the climax of the QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show), the whole of the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) and their wholly-owned press and FBI have realized that the nasty lesbian bitch is a lying crook? What's really going on here?   FBI boss James Comey works for the Obongo administration, which suggests that Obongo (or perhaps even a higher authority in "deep-state"), and not Comey, is behind this 11th hour crash of the Killary campaign. Anyone who thinks that Comey is his own man is being naive. So, why would Mr. and Mr. Obongo, the evil phony Julian Assange, and Sulzberger's Slimes conspire to help Donald Trump, you ask? Four possibilities.   The object of the game is to either:   1- .... trigger a national crisis which will either cancel the election or lead to an electoral college appointment for a new President other than Trump (Rat Ryan?)   2- .... install Trump -- an unwitting tool in this game -- crash the fragile bubble-system with 2017 interest rate hikes and then blame Republicans   3- .... damage Killary, install her as damaged goods, indict her after the election but before the inauguration, Obongo remains President.   What are "the powers that be" really up to?   4- Another factor to consider, which may overlap with Option # 1 or #2, is Bibi Satanytahu's hatred for the Clintons who, like Soros, are more Globalist than they are Zionist. Indeed, when Slick Willie Clinton was President, he interfered in Israeli politics to such an extent that Satanyahu lost his re-election bid in 1999. Bibi's influential American agents and allies are generally anti-Killary, but that might not account for the Globalist Slimes suddenly dumping on Killary.    NOV. 27, 1997 Netanyahu Says Clinton's Refusal to Meet Him 'Humiliated' Israel By DAVID STOUT "In today's interview, the Prime Minister's anger flared when he was asked, ''Do you believe the President of the United States is trying to humiliate you?'' Laboring for a moment over his words, Mr. Netanyahu said: ''No Prime Minister of Israel is humiliated personally. All insults are directed to the office of the Prime Minister of the state of Israel, and the entire Jewish state feels humiliated if such action is directed against us.'' (here)     If any of "youse guys"  can come up with another plausible theory as to why the Golden Ghoul just got the rug pulled out from under her, we'd love to hear it. But please, don't insult Mike's intelligence and Sugar's instincts with any nonsense about "FBI agents forced Comey's hand" or "WikiLeaks is a legit whistle-blowing organization" or "her crimes are so bad that the media cannot cover up for her anymore."  No, no and no!   This final week of the QFS is going to be very interesting and will reveal many answers to the questions that have vexed us all year long. The coming events may not be suitable for the weak-hearted. Stay tuned.     Israeli nationalist-terrorist strongman Bibi Satanyahu has humiliated both Globalist Obongo and Killary to their faces. Are we witnessing his ultimate revenge? Boobus Americanus 1: The New York Times was wall-to-wall with bad press of Hillary Clinton today. Boobus Americanus 2: I know. I understand the Chicago Tribune has called for her to drop out of the race!        Sugar: It'ss a frickin' consspiracy! Editor: No doubt it is. The only question is what the game is really all about. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com   2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 28, 2016

REBUTTAL BY For weeks now, Orange Man has been ridiculing the Department of Offense's policy of publicly announcing its next move against phony "ISIS." During the 2nd debate, he said: "Why can't they do it quietly? Why can't they do the attack, make it a sneak attack, and after the attack is made, inform the American public that we've knocked out the (ISIS) leaders, we've had a tremendous success? Why do they have to say we're going to be attacking Mosul within the next four to six weeks?" Orange Man went on to explain that such announcements "stupidly" give advance warning to ISIS leaders, thus allowing them to "escape" to another area. Of course, these announcements are not actually the product of "stupidity" -- a fact which Orange Man surely knows but will not, for political reasons, actually say. The advance statements are intended to allow the CIA-Mossad mercenary army that is ISIS to escape unharmed. From the article: "The fight to retake Raqqa, the Syrian city that serves as the capital of the Islamic State, must begin soon — within weeks — to disrupt planning believed to be underway there to stage terrorist attacks on the West, senior Defense Department and military officials said on Wednesday. Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter said in Brussels on Wednesday that the offensive to oust the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, from Raqqa would begin within weeks. This is, as always, a matter when you’re positioning forces and so forth, we have a plan to do that and a schedule to do that,” Mr. Carter told reporters. “We’re going to execute to that plan.”   We refer to the warmongering neo-con psycho Ash Carter as Ass Carter.   1- Trump: "How stupid are we?"   2- Offense Secretary Ass Carter works for Bibi Satanyahu. The body language of the handshake between the two clearly shows who is the master and who is the butt-kissing subordinate.   3- Carter walks across the floor to hug Satanyahu, who awaits his embrace like a proud papa waiting for his little boy to run into his arms.   The manufactured phoniness of this controlled bogeyman known as 'ISIS' has three manifestations:   1- The actors in black ski-masks carrying out fake "beheadings" of fellow agents in orange jump suits. 2- The actual mercenary fighters on the ground 3- The "crisis actor" false-flag attacks in places like Brussels, Nice, and Paris   The ultimate goal is to bring the U.S. military directly into the "Syrian Civil War" under the pretext of "fighting ISIS." The true objective is to overthrow the Russian-protected government of President Assad. For today's bit of ISIS-debunking, your child-at-heart reporter here takes you back to the exciting comic-book tales of "The Amazing Spider Man" -- the coolest super-hero ever!   Apart from the fact that both Spider Man and ISIS Man are children's stories; and apart from the fact that both wear full facial masks; there is a third thing the two have in common -- a commonality which gives the game away by exposing their respective identities.   As those of you who read the comics as children, or saw either the TV cartoons or the more recent Hollywood movie versions know; Spider Man is really Peter Parker -- a teen-aged nerd who works part-time as a photographer for The Daily Bugle. Month after month, as Spider Man dispatches one super-villain after another, Peter Parker amazes his cigar-chomping boss, J. Jonah Jameson, with his uncanny ability to be in the right place at the right time to capture photos of Spider Man in action. The photos pay well for young Parker. Scoop after scoop after scoop, and still no one is able to figure out Peter's secret for obtaining such blockbuster photos of New York's favorite Super Hero and the related crime scenes.     Spidey Selfies   Years ahead of his time, Peter Parker places an automated tracking device in his suit so that the camera he sets up always takes great shots of Spider-Man in action.    * Who would ever suspect that the masked man and the "lucky" photographer are one in the same!   Now, what has this got to do with ISIS Man? Well, you see boys and girls, ISIS Man also has a photographer - and videographer - with this weird ability to obtain the only images of ISIS Man. Her name is Rita Katz, and her "organization" is known as SITE (Search for International Terrorist Entities). You may have seen the SITE logo on so many of the internationally televised images of ISIS Man. Have a look and see:     David Haines ISIS Man "beheads" James Foley. ISIS Man "beheads" Joel Sotloff. ISIS Man "beheads" David Haines. David Haines   ISIS Man "beheads" Alan Henning. ISIS Men "behead" a whole bunch of Christians! ISIS Man "beheads" Kenji Goto   1- ISIS Man with ISIS Boy forget their masks and "behead" unknown victim. 2- ISIS Knife-Man hams it up for the cameras -- "Allah Akbar!" 2- ISIS Men and victims change uniform colors for the "beheading" ceremony of a bunch of African Christians. It's perfectly OK to laugh because NOBODY was actually hurt in these silly SITE "beheading" videos! Even The Times of London reported on the fakeness of the very first "beheading" video -- before suddenly dropping the story the next day.     And there are plenty more such goof-ball scenes where those came from -- and they are still coming! Who is this Rita Katz woman who heads up SITE as its Executive Director? And: how in the world does she pull so many 'Peter Parker' scoop-photos and videos out of her Magic Hat? Well, self-professed 'terrorism analyst' and pathological Muslim-basher Rita Katz is an Iraqi-born Jew whose family moved to Israel after her wealthy father was accused of being a Mossad agent, and then executed for treason. In Israel she served in the merciless IDF (Israeli Defense Force) and graduated from Tel Aviv University. Since 2002, Katz has run SITE out of Washington DC. (Wikipedia)   Scoop after scoop after scoop after scoop of "beheading videos" that no one else has been able to even get close to. How does the Amazing Rita manage to pull it off? --- Ask Peter Parker.     1- Rita the "terrorism expert" on CNN 2- Spidey says: "Rita & Friends = ISIS"     Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that we will be attacking the ISIS stronghold of Raqqa in Syria. Boobus Americanus 2: You know, Trump does have a point. Why must we publicly announce these attacks? Doesn't that tip the bad guys off as to what's coming?        Sugar: Follow that line of thought Boobuss -- and the mysstery will reveal itsself! Editor: I'm afraid that our water cooler intellectuals here haven't the mental stamina necessary to follow this loose thread to its logical conclusion. * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com   2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3

THURSDAY / OCTOBER 27, 2016

REBUTTAL BY Have "youse guys" noticed that all-of-a-sudden, it has become socially and journalisticly acceptable for communists and libtards to state the obvious truth about ObongoCare that opponents of the scheme had been saying all along -- namely, that the monstrosity was going to eventually self-destruct? Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press are notorious for either denying or ignoring that which is inconveniently obvious, especially when it comes to their Golden Boys Mr. Obongo & Mr. Obongo. So, what's going on with all this recent negative coverage about 'The Affordable Care Act" -- aka ObongoCare? It's elementary, dear reader, elementary.   By any measure, ObongoCare, with all its empty promises, has turned to be a disaster. But why are Sulzberger's Slimes the Piranha Press suddenly now so openly admitting, and even hyping up this fact?   You see, ObongoCare was destined to implode -- by design. After the collapse of this halfway measure, just as Obongo departs the stage, President Killary's assigned role will be to step in and save the day with a "single payer system" -- a euphemism for full-scale communist takeover of the entire heath sector, financed by new taxes up the proverbial "waazoo." Hear it from anus-frenching lips of the Joker-In-Chief himself, spoken among friendly supporters while he was an unknown Senate candidate back in 2003:   "I happen to be a proponent of a single payer.. universal health care program. I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its Gross National Product on health care cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody. And that’s what Jim is talking about when he says everybody in, nobody out -- A single payer health care plan, a universal health care plan. And that’s what I’d like to see."   When speaking among fellow co-conspirators, communist liars become very honest.   Because the country, in spite of having just recently elected Obongo, was not yet ready for full blown communism in 2009; ObongoCare was installed to act as a halfway-step toward communist health care. Enticed by the prospect of new forced customers, the short-sighted greedy "capitalists" of the Health Insurance industry ignored this higher reality and foolishly dropped any opposition to their own coming death warrant. After the inevitable implosion of the grand scheme (which is now in process) the private insurance sector (barring a Trump victory) will be wiped altogether, at least for all but the very wealthy.   After Killary and the CIA-media steal the coming election, Americans will come to learn just how expensive "free" health care will actually be.  This massive insurer exodus from ObongoCare markets is already creating a shrinking pool of competition that will the stage for the inevitable push for a "single-payer" -- and/or a "public option" to either be added to, or to replace Obongo's monster. In a recent Journal of the American Medical Association article, one of Obongo's ghostwriters, called for adding a public option and propping up the exchanges with more tax dollars. He also wished for more government bureaucrats to make decisions on how care is delivered; and pharmaceutical price controls which would destroy research and development and deny patients access to promising new drugs. One need look no further than the Veterans Administration to understand what a communist "single-payer" health-care system looks like. Horror stories of long waits for treatment, bureaucratic delays, fraud, and incompetence are the norm. It's bad enough that the phony Medicare "trust fund" will be broke within 10 years. Only massive tax hikes, more borrowing and more premature killing of seniors with morphine will save that pyramid scheme for the elderly. Just imagine the investment-crushing, job-killing financial burden upon the private economy, and the crappy rationed quality of "care" when the system is expanded to include everyone. Don't get sick, folks, don't get sick!   1 - 1993: Then-president Bill Clinton holds up a proposed "health security card" during a 1993 State-of-the-Union speech. 2 - "Health Care That's Always There" --- First Lady / Co-President headed up the failed effort for commie-care in 1993. Boobus America wasn't ready for such a radical step at that time. They are ready today. 3 - Though psycho-fag Obongo and psycho-dyke Killary personally hate each other, their ideological bonds will soon have made them a devastating 1-2 punch to knockout America once and for all.   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that costs for ObamaCare are rising rapidly. Boobus Americanus 2: Wow. That wasn't supposed to happen.        Sugar: Actually, Boobuss -- it WASS ssupossed to happen! Editor: Good comeback, Sugar --- and no vulgarity too! * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com   2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3

TUESDAY / OCTOBER 25, 2016

REBUTTAL BY Amazing, isn't it? Even in the midst of their own Jewish-engineered slow motion genocide by immigration and the lowest birth rates on Planet Earth, the de-balled and de-moralized Germans are still whipping themselves over the "Holocaust" TM -- an event which never happened. Hence, it is often referred to by those of us in-the-know as, "the Holohoax." Let's clean up some of this filth vomited out by Alison Smale --  New York Slimes bureau chief in Berlin. Hazmat suits and goggles on -- into Sulzberger's cesspool we go:   The 100 year old pre-planned genocide of the Aryans is entering its final stage -- as suicidal Germans still whine and self-flagellate over the Holohoax.   Smale: Berlin -- The exhibition, which opened late last month, confronts the mass murder of Jews and other minorities after the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941. For all the attention paid to the past here, this display is the first in Germany to focus solely on those executions of more than two million people. Rebuttal: It's interesting. The Soviets themselves, who helped to orinate the Holohoax by issuing a report on their "findings" at Auschwitz on the very day of Germany's unconditional surrender (so that the gagged Germans would not be able to respond to the ridiculous allegations), never mentioned these "two million" outside-of-concentration-camp executions. Smale: Their bodies fell into pits, which were then covered and left as anonymous mass graves. Rebuttal:  Where are these "mass graves?" Why were they never dug up and shown to the world for propaganda purposes? Smale: This “Holocaust of the Bullets,” as it has come to be known, is deeply familiar to citizens of the former Soviet Union, particularly in Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltics and large parts of western Russia. Rebuttal: “Holocaust of the bullets,” --- LOL! Who writes this corny crap? Steven Spielberg? There were indeed cases of German SS carrying out executions in the field. But what Smales won't tell you is that the "victims" were Red & Jewish partisan terrorists. These were the same types that committed genocide against anti-communist Russians during the civil war of just 20 years before. Because of their brutality against German soldiers and Russian civilians alike, they were not treated as standard Prisoners of War, but were often executed as war criminals instead.    NEW YORK TIMES (VE Day) MAY 8, 1945 /  Page 12, Column 5 * By releasing the damning report as soon as Germany uncondituionally surrendered and handed over all of its media to the Allies, Stalin prevented the Germans from denying the lies that his henchmen had spun about Auschwitz.       OSWIECIM KILLINGS PLACED AT 4,000,000   **********************   Soviet Commission Reports Death Camp in Poland Was Founded by Himmler.   **********************  By C. L. Sulzberger By Wireless to The New York Times (full article --- here)       Smales: In Germany, however, the mass shootings are less known than the gas chambers and horrors of Auschwitz, Treblinka and other camps in Nazi-occupied Poland. Rebuttal:  The reason that "the Holocaust of the Bullets" is "less known than the gas chambers" is that this fictitious mass-shooting of these two million Jews was only recently invented. You see, because the "6 million" TM dead in the "gas chambers" TM fairy tale is becoming logistically unsustainable, the ever-reducing concentration camp death tolls have to be made up somewhere else in order to keep the number at "6 million" TM. Smales: At the opening of the exhibit, Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier used the occasion to link the past and the present. Since 2014, with the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine, Europe has again had to face “the question of war and peace,” Mr. Steinmeier said. Rebuttal: Notice the subtle, non-spoken linkage of The Great One (past) to Putin (the present) -- a damn fine compliment to Putin in our book! Smales: He said nine towns that he had visited in the past year in Ukraine and the region lost more than 180,000 inhabitants during the Nazi invasion. Rebuttal:  Actually, many people in the Ukraine region, and Russia proper itself were overjoyed when the Germans invaded! Germany's "winning of the hearts and minds" began to change when Soviet leaders Stalin and Kaganovich (cough, cough) ordered false-flag atrocity attacks against his own people.   Jews and communists may not have been happy to see the Germans arrive, but as the images above show, everyday Ukrainians and Russians greeted the Germans as heroic liberators in 1941. This began to change when Soviet NKVD death squads, dressed in German uniforms, began to commit atrocities and spread doctored photos.   Smales: In these “wounded landscapes” of “the forgotten Holocaust,” Mr. Steinmeier said, “this exhibit removes the layers and brings to light, layer by layer, the details of a past which is not just an eastern one, but also ours. Without consciousness of those layers under the landscape, we Germans can never do justice -- .... “We Germans know the stories and the scars much less well than we like to think.” Rebuttal: "We Germans" did this. "We Germans" did that. Get off your damn knees, man! Sickening. Smales: The special show — “Mass Shootings: The Holocaust From the Baltic to the Black Sea 1941-1944” — was mounted in cooperation with the foundation behind the nearby Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe. Rebuttal: Dadgummit! Jews, Jews, Jews. Did no else die in World War II? Can we at least get a "shout-out" for the 1 million actual German civilians bombed and burned to death during the war? Or the many millions killed by starvation, disease and mass execution after the war? Smales: At the entrance, a map shows 722 places where more than 500 people were killed by the Nazis’ firing squads. “The map illustrates how bitter the history is, and how difficult it was to mount this exhibit,” Mr. Nachama said. Rebuttal: If you know where these 722 killing fields are, then where are the 2,000,000 skeletal remains? Hmmmm? Smales: To judge by the solemn and attentive visitors viewing the exhibit on the first Sunday it was open, early this month, it hits home with foreigners and Germans alike.   Rebuttal: Having visited, just out of curiosity, various museum exhibits with "politically correct" themes (Modern Art, Evolution, Smithsonian etc.), your observant reporter here is always struck and humored by the odd way in which obedient libtards will suddenly turn all "solemn and attentive" whenever in the presence of puffed-up crap -- as if they are at a church funeral mass or something. Such frickin' weirdos! It's enough to make one want to gulp down a can of beans and a dozen or so Brussels Sprouts a few hours before visiting the exhibit -- just to add a bit of musical comic relief to the oh-so "solemn and attentive" proceedings.     The uptight "solemn and attentive" German sheeple who worship this commie crap could use a good wake call.   Smales: Joshua Bagetti, 27, an electrician visiting from Brisbane, Australia, seemed dazed. Rebuttal: "Seemed dazed" --- See what I mean? Smales: He was, he said, stunned to see how rapidly the Nazis had invaded “and how far down south they went” — through the Caucasus to bump up practically against the Middle East. Rebuttal:  Well Josh, allow us to un-stun you by schooling you on a fact of history that you'll not hear about in some Jewish-inspired "exhibit." The Great One ordered the invasion of the Soviet Union to preempt Stalin's imminent invasion and enslavement of Europe. You do know who Stalin was, and what he did, right? Probably not. Smales: Three 20-year-olds from around Cologne who were in Berlin for job training included the exhibit in their plans for their visit, said Christine Gronemann, one of the three. ....  their lessons did make one thing plain, she said: “It was very clearly stated that Nazism, and everything to do with it, is not good.” Rebuttal:  "Nazism" (a term invented by Jewish propagandists) is "not good." -- such a profound analysis from the no-doubt "solemn and attentive" 20-year old Christine. Smales: Being taught about the Holocaust, and Germany’s guilt, is a ritual of adolescence here. Students visit former concentration camps or memorials to smaller camps. If a school and its community can manage it, students go to Israel. Holocaust survivors, their numbers dwindling, are honored guests at German schools. Rebuttal: That entire sentence just makes us want to cry. Pure child abuse.   Students throughout Germany, the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe generally do not learn how to think critically, and in many cases, graduate deficient in reading, writing, arithmetic, history, geography etc. ----- but they sure so know all about the "Holocaust" TM!   Smales: Margot Friedlander, 94, is one such survivor. Born in Berlin, she was hidden by Germans from 1943 to 1944 and then deported to Theresienstadt, the camp north of Prague where she met her future husband, Adolf Friedlander. Rebuttal: So, Margot met the man who later become her husband in a concentration camp. Interesting. Did she first bump into him in "zee gas chamber?" -- "Hey baby. You come here often?" Smales: A rabbi married them in spring 1945 in Theresienstadt, and the next year they left for New York, .... Rebuttal: Say what?! --- Mighty kind of those big bad Germans to allow rabbis to marry young interned Jewish couples, even in the closing months of the war when all was lost and you'd think the Germans would be at their most vindictive. Doesn't that sort of contradict the official narrative of a genocidal campaign against the interned Jews? Just sayin'. Smales: After he died in 1997, she started writing her memoir, eventually published in German. Rebuttal: Cha ching! Cha-ching! Cha-ching! Ah, show us the shekels Margot, show us the shekels. Smales: That led to a trip to Berlin, and a decision to stay. Visiting schools is perhaps the most important part of her new life, she said, “because they are the future.” Rebuttal: Oh what demonic glee this old yenta must derive from corrupting the grandchildren and great grandchildren of the kind German people who had, in the decades before World War I, treated the Jews so well -- only to later be repaid by the widespread Jewish / Marxist / Zionist treason which lost the war for Germany. (See "The Bad War" by yours truly) Smales: In this respect, did Hitler’s efforts to mold German culture triumph? Not if you listen to Ms. Friedlander, who has faith in the young. “What was, was,” she said. Now, “they are the ones who must shape society.” Translation: "We Jews have trained the youth of Germany to commit suicide, and like it!"   Money-grubbing Margot Friedlander and her fellow Tribesman are GENOCIDING Germany (and all of Whitedom) through the minds of the brainwashed youth. Image 3: German kids chant: "Long live international solidarity" (world government).   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today of a museum exhibit in Berlin about the "Holocaust by Bullets"  -- the little known mass executions of 2 million Jews, committed mainly in the fields of the Soviet Union. Boobus Americanus 2: Yes. I read that piece. It is said that German visitors to the exhibit were very "solemn and attentive".       Editor: Sugar!!!! * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:     2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

MONDAY / OCTOBER 24, 2016

REBUTTAL BY Oh my, the "scholars" are "alarmed." This must be serious! Slimes scribblers Max Fisher (cough cough) and Amanda Taub (cough cough) explain:   . Fisher & Taub, along with a handful of select "scholars," spook the sheeple with warnings about Trump and "fascism" TM   Fisher & Taub: Donald J. Trump’s suggestions that he might reject the results of the American election as illegitimate have unnerved scholars ... Rebuttal: There was a time when words like "scholar" or "intellectual" actually meant something. The terms once described learned men who were steeped in "the classics" of Western Civilization -- well-rounded and well-versed in philosophy, literature, applied science, the arts, history, logic; and often conversant in Latin and at least one other language besides their mother tongue. Today, the term generally applies to any diploma-decorated erudite egghead who can recite the top 100 politically correct platitudes on command. The correct term for these puffed-up goof-balls is "sophist" -- not "scholar." Fisher & Taub: ... on democratic decline, who say his language echoes that of dictators who seize power by force and firebrand populists who weaken democracy for personal gain. Rebuttal: See that?! What did I just say about reciting meaningless platitudes? --- "language echoes that of dictators" --- "firebrand populists" --- "weaken democracy for personal gain." That's soooo profound. (rolling eyes sarcastically) * Platitude: a remark or statement, especially one with a moral content, that has been used too often to be interesting or thoughtful. Fisher & Taub (quoting a professor): “To a political scientist who studies authoritarianism, it’s a shock,”... Rebuttal: I never understood this self-serving term "political scientist." The field of politics, which encompasses things like history, current events, philosophy etc., is indeed a fascinating and legitimate field of study, but it's not "science." It seems like these academic ass clowns gave themselves the title of "scientist" to compensate for some sort of insecurity over the fact they they are not men of actual science. It's as corny as it is annoying, but I digress. Fisher & Taub: ... said Steven Levitsky, a professor at Harvard. Rebuttal: Levitsky, eh? (cough cough)  --- nuff said.   The scholar / scientist in image #1 (Nikola Tesla) was instrumental in developing commercial electricity. The scholar / scientist in image #2 (Wernher von Braun) was instrumental in developing rocket science. The "scholar / political scientist" in image #3 (Steven Levitsky) spews Marxist platitudes in flowery language.   Fisher & Taub: “This is the stuff that we see in Russia and Venezuela and Azerbaijan and Malawi and Bangladesh, and that we don’t see in stable democracies anywhere.” Rebuttal: Actually, professor Lesshitsky, we do not see that "stuff" in any the countries you just listed. As far as we have been able to determine after scouring the Internet, every "democratic" TM nation on earth requires some form of ID, generally a photo ID, in order to vote. Only in the United States of George Soros (cough cough) can any ole homeless crack-head, enticed with a carton of Newports, walk into an inner-city polling place and repeatedly vote under the names of various dead people. Fisher & Taub: Throughout October, Mr. Trump has claimed, without evidence, that the vote will be “rigged” and “taken away from us.” At the final presidential debate, he refused to say he would accept the election’s outcome... Rebuttal: Re-writing the above sentence with a few minor tweaks exposes a hypocrisy and double standard that "the Tribe" is notorious for. Let's try this: Throughout October, Mrs. Clinton has claimed, without evidence, that the vote will be “rigged” and “taken away from us” by Russian hackers working for Putin. At the final presidential debate, she refused to say he would accept the election’s outcome... There -- fixed it! Fisher & Taub: In weak democracies around the world, scholars warned Friday, political leaders have used the same language to erode popular faith in democracy — often intending to incite violence that will serve their political aims, and sometimes to undo democracy entirely. Rebuttal: "erode popular faith in democracy" -- "intending to incite violence" -- "undo democracy entirely" --- Again: * Platitude: a remark or statement, especially one with a moral content, that has been used too often to be interesting or thoughtful. Fisher & Taub: “Almost always, public faith, public trust in institutions is eroded when this happens,” Mr. Levitsky said. Rebuttal: ... "public trust in institutions is eroded when this happens." --- No, Leshitsky. "Public trust in institutions is eroded" when people are allowed to vote without establishing who the hell they are!   Image 1: Besides voting, there isn't much one can do in America without showing proper identification. Image 2: Even some of the most corrupt Turd World nations require photo-ID and finger inking to protect the legitimacy of their elections. Image 3: 2008 - Ooops! Ron Jones of Filthydelphia tells CNN: "I voted a couple of times." (for Obongo) -- (You Tube Here)   Fisher & Taub: By placing blame for his likely loss on electoral fraud, he is telling his supporters not only that the results are flawed, but also that the democratic process has been seized by shadowy forces ... Rebuttal:  And we all know that there is no such thing as "shadowy forces." That would be a "conspiracy theory" TM. --- Unless, of course, we are talking about "shadowy forces" working for Putin. Then it is perfectly permissible to suspect that nefarious Rooskies are hiding under every keyboard. Fisher & Taub: In this view, “your opponents are not just somebody that you differ with on policy, it’s that they’re somehow trying to undermine the will of the people,” said Sheri Berman, a professor of political science at Barnard College who studies Europe’s descent into fascism in the 1930s. Rebuttal: Berman, eh? (cough cough) --- to boot, the yapping yenta "studies Europe’s descent into fascism in the 1930s" -- Nuff said. Fisher & Taub: Rejecting elections as rigged, she said, sends the message that both the winner and democracy itself  “fundamentally threaten what the people actually want.” Rebuttal: "sends the message" -- "democracy itself " -- “fundamentally threaten what the people actually want.” --- Once again, class: * Platitude: a remark or statement, especially one with a moral content, that has been used too often to be interesting or thoughtful. Fisher & Taub: This strategy, she (Berman) said, is twofold: first, to present the country’s democracy as so flawed that a strong leader is required to step in to restore order; and second, to generate unrest that the strongman can wield as leverage. Rebuttal: I can't stomach this nasty hag anymore. Next witness. Fisher & Taub: (quoting another "scholar") “Merely talking about not accepting results sets off a chain of events that weakens the structure of democratic continuity,” Matt Glassman, a political scientist, wrote this past week. Rebuttal: Glassman, eh? (cough cough) Boy oh boy; the Manischewitz Grapevine is really buzzing like a livewire over Trump's warning of voter fraud. Methinks the seditious shysters doth protest a bit toooo much, eh? Fisher & Taub: Contesting a presidential election, he said, risks turning bedrock democratic assumptions — rule of law, the peaceful transfer of power, the sanctity of elections — into points of political dispute. Rebuttal:  "bedrock democratic assumptions" -- "rule of law" -- "the peaceful transfer of power" -- "the sanctity of elections" --- Wow. Such "scholarship." Eat your hearts out Messrs. Plato, Socrates, Schopenhauer, Jefferson, Franklin et al. .. One more time, boys and girls: * Platitude: a remark or statement, especially one with a moral content, that has been used too often to be interesting or thoughtful. Fisher & Taub: But not all leaders execute this playbook consciously or with an eye toward some specific prize, said Nic Cheeseman, a political scientist at the University of Oxford who studies sub-Saharan Africa. Rebuttal: Cheeseman, eh? (cough cough) Can we get a little diversity here, please? You know, a token goy puppet or two -- just to make it look good? . Great "scholars" such as Berman, Glassman and Cheeseman may dazzle their captive college kiddies with their glib rap and libtarded cliches, but we are not impressed by such silly sophism.   Fisher & Taub: While Mr. Trump’s supporters do not have to fear political oppression if he loses,...  If those conditions are taken together, Mr. Cheeseman said, the outlook is not one of doom, but it is worrisome. Rebuttal: Sugar and I, er, The Editorial Board of The Anti-New York Times, are getting the ominous sense that the playbook calls for Killary to win (by fraud) and for the country to be destabilised  / demoralized by Trump's rightful claims of "rigging." We shall know soon enough. Fisher & Taub: America’s democratic norms make widespread unrest unlikely, Mr. Levitsky said. Still, because Mr. Trump has spent much of his campaign challenging the legitimacy of the election, should he refuse to concede a loss, that could be “enough to provoke a fair amount of violence” from fringe elements. As he went on, Mr. Levitsky’s language lapsed into a vernacular more commonly applied to very different sorts of countries: “American security forces,” he said, would need to move carefully to resolve any “electoral violence.” Rebuttal: You hear that?  --- “American security forces” -- these busy little devils are up to something.   Hymie's wet dream ----- Sooner or later, the Globalists will attempt to unleash the Department of Homeland Security (imposed during the reign of Bush-Cheney in response to the 9/11 false flag scam) upon a rebellious population. Could the coming fury over a stolen election -- along with a "patriot" and / or anti-Russia false-flag -- be used as the pretext?   Fisher & Taub (quoting yet another "scholar"): “I actually can’t believe all of the parallels. I actually can’t believe that it’s happening here,” Erica Frantz, a political science professor at Michigan State University, recently told The Toronto Star, ... Rebuttal: Frantz, eh? (yet another cough cough) --- WTF man! Fisher & Taub: “Boy, is Trump giving those of us who study populism, fascism and the erosion of democratic norms ever more to think about,” ... Rebuttal: (palm to face, shaking head, sighing) -- "populism, fascism and the erosion of democratic norms" -- All together now: * Platitude: a remark or statement, especially one with a moral content, that has been used too often to be interesting or thoughtful. Fisher &Taub: “When you start to delegitimize your electoral systems (and) your media ... then you start to have people genuinely questioning the value of the system,” Mr. Cheeseman said. “It takes a generation to rebuild that trust. This is not something that gets done in a year or two.” Rebuttal: The only people still defending "the value of the system" by supporting Killary are the big money/media interests (cough cough) and their controlled cadres of welfare parasites, imbecilic libtards, millennial morons, bitter vagina voters who have either been ignored, abandoned or abused by some man, envious anti-Whites of every shade, and kept academic eggheads such as the lying communists quoted in this atrocious article. Unfortunately, when illegal aliens and dead bodies are added to this mix (to say nothing of those dreadful computerized voting machines!), it could very well be enough to install that hideous hag from hell into the Rainbow House. God how we hate you deceiving sons (and daughters) of bitches.   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that many eminent scholars are alarmed over Trump's de-legitimizing of our elections. Boobus Americanus 2: Yes. It does smack of fascism.         Sugar:  Under fascism, you two witless ass-clownss would not have ended up becoming sso vulnerable to sstupid frickin' jewissh platitudess!  Editor: Very true, Sugar. Goebell's Ministry of Public Enlightment and Propaganda opened the eyes and freed the minds of an entire nation. * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 21, 2016

REBUTTAL BY The opening paragraph of this front page announcement confirms what Sugar the Cat and I, er, the Editorial Board here at The Anti-New York Times has maintained all along, that is: in terms of sheer journalistic and political power, the Sulzberger-Ochs clan ranks only a notch below the Rothschild Dynasty. Hear it straight from the Hebrew Horse's mouth: "Since 1896, when Adolph S. Ochs bought The New York Times, the Ochs-Sulzberger family has controlled the newspaper. It led the company through two world wars, the publication of the Pentagon Papers, labor strife and severe financial challenges, striving to maintain the paper’s importance even as new forms of media threatened to overtake it. “The Times,” Arthur Hays Sulzberger said in 1963 when he named his son publisher, “is a family enterprise.” On Wednesday, The Times continued that tradition, naming Arthur Gregg Sulzberger, a member of the fifth generation of the family, the deputy publisher. The appointment positions him to succeed his father as publisher and chairman of The New York Times Company."     The "prestigious" Slimes was instrumental in selling many huge historical lies before any hard data had even been gathered: 1- 1915: The Lusitania was NOT "torpedoed twice." The second explosion was caused by ignition of smuggled munitions. 2- 1939: Germany did NOT "attack Poland." It was Poland, (at the behest of UK, France & FDR) which drew first blood. 3- 1963: John F. Kennedy was NOT "killed by a sniper" (named Lee Harvey Oswald). He was shot in the face from the "grassy knoll."   This article ought to once and for all dispel the lie of the Jewish deniers of Jewish control of Sulzberger's Slimes who often whine: "The Times is a public corporation" -- or -- "Carlos Slim of Mexico now owns the Times."  Apart from the fact that the Slimes' roster of Red reporters reads like the guest list for a Bar Mitzvah, the Sulzberger Crime Family owns the majority of voting shares. As for Senor Slim, he only owns 16% of the Slimes. Nice try, Hymie, but the Sulzbergers still run this evil propaganda sheet and their own front page confirms it. Since its founding in 1851 by Republican Henry Jarvis Raymond, The Times has been a big player in shaping public opinion. But it was not until 1896 that the Times took a turn to the internationalist Left when it was purchased by the German-Jew named Adolph Ochs. In 1897, Ochs himself would coin the paper's now famous self-serving slogan, printed on its masthead every day ever since: "All the News That’s Fit to Print”. Ochs’ daughter married Arthur Hays Sulzberger, who became publisher when Adolph died in 1935. After A.H. Sulzberger's reign (1935-1961), Orville Dryfoos headed the paper for 2 years before Arthur Ochs "Punch" Sulzberger Sr. took over (1963-1992). He spawned the demon-seed Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. -- who is still the publisher of the NY Times today, and father of the just-named heir to the throne, A.G. Sulzberger. So, for 120 years, and well into the foreseeable future, America’s most influential propaganda sheet has been in the hands of the same Zionist-Marxist family. That's some serious power, and probably not 1 in 250 Americans have ever even heard of this family of fiends! . All the new that's fit to distort is more like it!   Just how powerful is “Sulzberger’s Slimes?” Famed writer Gore Vidal may have been a morally degenerate sodomite who was wrong about many things, but his reference to the Slimes as “the Typhoid Mary of American journalism” was as spot-on as it was witty. One need only glance at the morning headlines of “the paper of record”, and then take note of how the superficial infomercials known as “the Nightly News” will so often pick up on whatever front page fairy-tale that the Manhattan Mendacity Machine spun that very same morning. The historical record is clear; Sulzberger's Slimes is the lead attack-fish of the Piranha Press. Like some journalistic plague; the virus of lies, half-truths and cherry-picked data then infects the unguarded minds of the whole country, and indeed, the world. Such is the indisputable destructive power and undeserved “prestige” of this dreadful “Orwellian” institution.   1 & 2 - As long as these sons-of-bitches keep lying, the Editorial Board of The Anti-New York Times will keep slinging rebuttals at the Sulzberger Crime Syndicate. 3 - "... the magnitude of a lie always contains a certain factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people .... more easily fall a victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of these causes as true. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick – a fact which all the great lie-virtuosi and lying-clubs in this world know only too well and also make the most treacherous use of." - The Great One (commenting on Germany's dishonest Jewish-owned press of World War I days)      Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the publisher of The Times will be handing over control of the paper to his son. Boobus Americanus 2: Oh. What's his name? Boobus Americanus 1: Sulzer, Schultsberg --- something like that. I can't remember exactly.        Sugar:  Amazing Boobuss! The Ssulzbergerss have owned your family'ss mind for a hundred and twenty yearss. And you don't even know their frickin' name!  Editor: Even many well informed patriots and conservatives aren't aware of this dangerous family. Many of them believe that Carlos Slim "owns The Times." * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com   2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3

THURSDAY / OCTOBER 20, 2016

REBUTTAL BY In the hopes of waking and re-balling the once great German / Austrian people, we interrupt this latest spectacle of self-abuse (their proud national pastime) with a dose of historical truth.   1914: The international bankers (cough cough) behind the New World Order crime gang imposed World War I upon peaceful Germany. But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people. 1919: By trickery and duress, the victorious NWO then imposed the subsequent inhumane Treaty of Versailles - an atrocity which tore apart chunks of German and Austrian territory and ruined their economies. But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people.   1- Woodrow Wilson had no business whatsoever declaring war on Germany and Austria-Hungary. 2- The monetary reparations imposed by the Versailles Treaty were unpayable. 3- After the collapse of Germany's currency, French invaders marched into unarmed Germany and collected physical resources instead. German citizens who complained were harassed at bayonet point and sometimes killed.   1939: The usual suspects then re-imposed World War (Part 2) upon Hitler's resurgent yet still peaceful Germany. But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people.   The above headlines confirm that it was Britain & France which started the war against Germany, not vice-versa. 1- "(Britain) Plans For a Long War -- Blunt Reply To Goering's Peace" 2- "(British) War Cabinet Ready For Long War, Will Win At All Costs" 3- "French Invade Reich"   1943-1945: The Allies carpet-bombed and fire-bombed crowded German cities, killing as many as 1 million civilians. But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people. 1945-1948: After winning the war and obtaining absolute mastery over the starving German people, the vindictive and victorious Allies (mainly Soviets, but Americans also participated) raped as many as two million women and murdered / caused the deaths of as many as 10 million defenseless Germans. (See "Hellstorm" --- if you've got the stomach for it!) But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people.   1 & 2- Relentless fire-bombing of women, elderly and children 3 - Deliberate starvation and disease-killing of 1.5 million exposed German POWs   The aforementioned crimes against humanity killed off many fine Germans, but never even came close to killing a whole people. When the book of history is finally closed on the extinct German race, honest future historians (if there will be any) will, above all, cite the suicidal guilt complex that was instilled in three post-war generations of German (and Austrian) children as the cause of the voluntary extinction. There is no coming back from that psychological atrocity -- a mental sickness, based on trauma and lies, which compels highly infertile German and Austrian libtards to actually welcome the Turd World invasion of one of the few remaining lands of the last pure Aryans. "Vee vere responseeble for zee Holocaust. So vee must velcome effryone." -- recites the obedient Teutonic libtard of manly Merkel's Marxified realm -- which leads us to mention this sad story about the destruction of The Great One's birthplace.   Pathetic German libtards are so very proud of committing national suicide as a means of atoning for the Holohoax.   The Austrian government has moved to seize the house where The Great One was born. Finally wrested from a private owner, the sacred site is to be torn down in order to "demystify a site that has become a magnet for neo-Nazis as well as tourists." Note the pathetic self-flagellation from Austrian politicians, from the article: "Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka has lobbied for the house to be torn down and replaced with an entirely new structure. In a statement on Monday, he repeated that wish, citing the findings of the historical commission, which recommended that “a thorough architectural remodeling is necessary to permanently prevent the recognition and the symbolism of the building.” Johannes Waidbacher, the mayor of Braunau am Inn, said he fully supported the commission’s finding, noting that it had further recommended that the site be used by a social or municipal institution, to further emphasize the rejection of Nazi ideology." Of course, the fact that statues of Jewish communists still stand doesn't trouble Herr Sobotka, Herr Waidbacher, and the vast majority of the brainwashed modern German people, at all. Mein Gott! That doomed country is so messed up.     Rosa Luxemburg (Berlin), Marx & Engels (Berlin) and another Marx (Chemnitz). The international movement which they represented actually killed far more people than The Great One mythically killed. Why is no one calling for the removal of those monuments? Answer: Because the Tribe owns the joint now! *Engels was not Jewish.   *   I know boss, I know.   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the Austrian government is going to buy the house that Hitler was born in and tear it down. Boobus Americanus 2: It's about time! Hitler was the most evil monster who ever lived.      Sugar:  Leave Baby Hitler's housse alone!  Editor: You guys make a very cute pair. * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com   2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3

WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 19, 2016

REBUTTAL BY One of the various and most effective defense mechanisms which psychopathic liars use to counter an accusation is what we will call the "admit & mock trick." For example, a cheating spouse who suddenly comes under suspicion may sarcastically respond in her defense: "Oh sure. In between taking the kids to school and sports, housekeeping and a part-time job, I'm having secret rendezvous with my younger lover at the motel. You got me!"  Though the comical mockery may reassure a suspicious husband, the admission may actually be true! The target is left feeling stupid and perhaps even guilty over his suspicions. See the trick?   With the admit & mock routine in mind, let us examine a few select excerpts from Jim Rutenberg's (cough cough) criticism of those who criticize the media.   1- The dashing Jim Rutenberg deceitfully uses an "admit & mock"  trick to cover up the fact that more and more people are getting wise to the lies of The Jew York Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press   2- "Yeah, right. I was out with my so-called mistress all night. Ha ha ha ha."   Rutenberg (hence forward to be referred to as Rottenberg): It sure does get exhausting working for the global corporate media conspiracy. Rebuttal: The gullible reader is expected to now believe that there is no such thing as a "global corporate media conspiracy" -- which regular readers of the Anti-New York Times know damn well there is. Rottenberg: The hours are horrible (my kingdom for a weekend off). You never know what the puppet masters are going to order up next. Rebuttal: Again, total truth. The billionaire Sulzberger-Ochs Family (cough cough) has owned the undeservedly hallowed "paper of record" for the past 120 years. Is not the employee, by definition, the "puppet" of the owner?  Rottenberg: I wish that guy from Mexico, What’s-His-Face Slim, would get off my back. Rebuttal: Notice the diversionary cover-up to protect the Sulzberger-Ochs clan. Mexican investor Carlos Slim only owns 16% of Sulzberger's Slimes. It is the Jewish dynasty, not Senor Slim, which retains majority ownership and full control over editorial policy. Nice Straw Man, Rottenberg. Rottenberg: I probably shouldn’t joke. The anger being directed at the news media has become dangerous enough that some news organizations are providing security for staff members covering Trump rallies. “Someone’s going to get hurt” has become a common refrain in American newsrooms. Rebuttal: Cut the crap, Rottenberg! The only people getting hurt at Trump rallies are Trump supporters who have been stalked and beaten up by Demoncrap leftists as they exited. As much as Trump loyalists and every other decent American with any brain cells left hate the Piranha Press, no one is going to physically hurt you --- though it would be a joyous sight to see you get your pansy ass kicked and hard.   Pissed off and passionate? Yes ---- Dangerous? Not at all!   Rottenberg: On Thursday, Jim Acosta of CNN held up a sign left in the press section of Donald J. Trump’s rally in West Palm Beach that featured a swastika next to the word “Media.” Rebuttal: It should have been a communist hammer and sickle, but we understand the sign-holder's sentiment. Somebody get that guy a copy of "The Bad War," please. Rottenberg:  Later, in Cincinnati, the crowd met reporters with sustained boos, curses and chants of, “Tell the truth, tell the truth.” Rebuttal: Stop lying and Trump supporters will stop hating you. Very simple. Rottenberg: It was as tense as anyone had seen it since the candidacy of George Wallace, and yet it was almost understandable given what Mr. Trump had been telling them: The news media was trying to “poison the minds” of voters with “lies, lies, lies.” Rebuttal: You are a bunch of filthy liars. That is why we publish The Anti-New York Times, which documents and rebuts your lies day after day. Rottenberg: All of it, he said, is part of a “conspiracy against you, the American people” that also includes “global financial interests.” The idea that the press is part of some grand conspiracy against the people, presented in such incendiary terms, goes well beyond the longstanding Republican complaints about liberal bias. Rebuttal: Rottenberg, Sugar the Cat and I, er, The Editorial Board of the Anti-Times has been monitoring the Slimes and counting the number of anti-Trump and anti-Putin attacks on a daily basis. That's what we do. Over the past 30 days, the "paper of record" has published an average of seven grossly inaccurate and unproven anti-Trump hit pieces per day, with as many as 12 in a single day. How is that not a conspiracy?   According to Rottenberg's illogic, it's just a coincidence that Nationalist Trump is trashed by the Bildeberger Slimes on a daily basis while Globalist Killary is puffed-up on a daily basis.   Rottenberg: You’d more expect to hear it from Lenin or the pages of the anti-Semitic publication American Free Press than from the standard-bearer of the Republican Party. Rebuttal: There it is! The worn out and not-as-effective-as-it-used-to-be charge of "anti-Semitism" TM. Why are we not surprised? Rottenberg: But it is resonating with a large portion of the American electorate. We can debate whether the “corporate” news media is as left-leaning as critics claim. The answer, as I see it, is more than they’ll admit to themselves and less than conservatives claim. Rebuttal: It's a very good sign that the likes of Rottenberg is admitting that there is any bias at all in the Piranha Press. It shows that the "cat is out of the bag" and all he can do now is minimize the reality, but not deny it totally. Rottenberg: For all their many differences, the right-leaning editorial board of The Wall Street Journal and the left-leaning editorial boards of The New York Times and The Washington Post share the beliefs that global free trade is generally beneficial and that the United States needs to create ways to legalize the undocumented immigrant work force. Translation: The "left-leaning" vs "right-leaning" thing is all just a charade designed to keep the sheeple under the control of the New World Order gang. Rottenberg:  The newsrooms of The Times, The Journal and The Post operate independently from their editorial pages. Rebuttal: BULLSH!T! Rottenberg: There also tends to be a shared sense of noble mission across the news media that can preclude journalists from questioning their own potential biases. “The people who run American journalism, and who staff the newsrooms, think of themselves as sophisticated, cosmopolitan, and, culturally speaking, on the right side of history,” Rod Dreher, a senior editor at The American Conservative, told me. “They don’t know what they don’t know and they don’t care to know it.” Rebuttal: The obligatory gem buried in the cesspool of filth. Thanks Rottenberg. Rottenberg: It’s a pretty sweeping generalization. But a considerable percentage of the country believes it. An even larger percentage of Mr. Trump’s voters do. Rebuttal: A "considerable percentage of the country believes it" precisely because, as documented daily by your humble reporter and his ferocious feline sidekick, it is NOT a "sweeping generalization" -- which is why you lying sons of bitches are starting to get worried. Rottenberg: No matter what happens on Nov. 8, the notion isn’t going away. Rebuttal: Good! And for that reason, neither will the Anti-New York Times be "going away" any time soon. Rottenberg: Reporters can make mistakes, become overly chummy with sources and fall into traps that give the campaigns too much power over their reporting. .... It is not evidence that the news media, including The New York Times, is working in tandem with “globalists” and Mrs. Clinton’s campaign to deliver her the presidency.   Rebuttal: Oh really Rottenberg? Then what accounts for the Slimes' main front page, the front page of its National Section, and the Op-Ed pages being plastered with one blistering anti-Trump attack piece after another after another, every single day for the past several months? Do you even bother to read your own damn newspaper? Rottenberg: In the case of The Times, Mr. Trump has made its largest individual shareholder, Carlos Slim, of Mexico, part of the conspiracy. The Times’s publisher, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. — whose family controls the company’s voting shares — said in a statement that Mr. Slim “has never sought to influence what we report.” The Times’s executive editor, Dean Baquet, recently told me that he had never even met Mr. Slim. Rebuttal: Another nice little gem of buried truth. The Sulzbergers still run the show. Slim is nobody. Thanks Rottenberg.   1- The pro-bailout, pro-Turd World Invasion, pro-NAFTA, pro-Killary Wall Street Urinal may be less communist than the Slimes, but in no way can it be called "right-leaning" --- that is if we define "right" as being pro-limited government and pro-sovereignty. 2- The next time some disinfo artist claims that Carlos Slim (shown above) runs the Slimes, remember Ruttenberg's admission that Sulzberger is still the absolute King.   Rottenberg: Previously, I had mostly noticed suggestions of a Slim-Times conspiracy on sites like Breitbart and alt-right Twitter accounts. Rebuttal: That is why we refer to that site as Not-So-Brightbart. Rottenberg: In giving those allegations prominence, the standard-bearer of the Republican Party is adding a sinister, false twist to his press criticism that arguably puts the reporters covering his rallies in danger. In effect, he is painting them as traitors. Now, who’s poisoning the minds of the electorate?  Rebuttal: Oh quit it with the bloody drama of being "in danger." Ain't nobody gonna hurt you at a Trump rally, you sniveling little pussy. Though it would be nice to see some of you seditious scribblers strung up from the traffic lights.   A therapeutic daydream ---- Sulzberger, Soros, Jacob and Evelyn Rothschild * The Anti-New York Times does not advocate violence.   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that because Trump has incited so much hatred against the press, reporters are afraid to cover his rallies now. Boobus Americanus 2: This type of intimidation is eerily similar to the rise of the brown-shirt Nazis in Hitler's day.        Sugar:  To hell with the dissclaimer, daddy! If it were up to me I'd sstring up every lasst one of those mother- @#$#@^% Globalissts on live TV!  Editor: (palm to face, shaking head, sighing) * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com   2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3

TUESDAY / OCTOBER 18, 2016

REBUTTAL BY The complete neutering of the once-influential Roman Catholic Church was forecast more than 100 years ago in the riveting pages of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Whether one believes that the Protocols were indeed genuine documents revealing a worldwide Jewish conspiracy; or that they were just part of a literary hoax designed to serve as a warning is, in the grander scheme of things, irrelevant. That's because just about everything that the spooky-prescient Protocols described and predicted has turned out to be deadly accurate.   "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which are so violently repudiated by the Jews. With groans and moans, the Frankfurter Zeitung repeats again and again that these are forgeries. This alone is evidence in favor of their authenticity." -- The Great One, Mein Kampf, Chapter 11   "The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in ... They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time." -- Henry Ford, New York World, 1921   One of those many spot-on, long-range forecasts concerned the slow destruction of the Catholic Church and the moral code which it once instilled in its members. It has been a slow methodical kill that very few would have been imagined back in 1905, but an outcome that has indeed come to pass. Here is the relevant passage from the Protocols: "We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of the goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. ...  only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion, as to other religions we shall have still less difficulty in dealing with them, but it would be premature to speak of this now. We shall set clericalism and clericals into such narrow frames as to make their influence move in retrogressive proportion to its former progress. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. ..... By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place. The King of the Jews will be the real Pope of the Universe, the patriarch of an international Church. But, in the meantime, while we are re-educating youth in new traditional religions and afterwards in ours, we shall not overtly lay a finger on existing churches but we shall fight against them by criticism calculated to produce schism." One need only look at that miserable communist Pope from Argentina to understand the awesome "powers of prophecy" contained in these historical documents. With the Protocols in mind, we can better understand how the once respected MEN of the Priesthood-past have yielded to some of the liberal girly boys, faggots and pedophiles that infest the Church today. The Church was destroyed from within by infiltrators.   Frankie the Fake is a lifelong Marxist (liberation theology)  1- Loved by Communists and Globalists -- accepts a communist crucifix from Bolivia's President. 2- Loved by Zionists and Jewish Marxists --- tucks in his crucifix whenever he is in their presence. 3- Loved by the homos, lesbians and trannies whom he refuses to "judge."   One of the principal means of this subversive destruction came in the form of child molesting priests and the Church's inability to mole hunt the queers and communists within. The purpose of this rebuttal is not to defend the queer clerics and their higher-up protectors; but rather to call attention to the hypocritical silence over the widespread problem of child molestation within the Jewish Rabbinate. Yes, that's right. Rabbis have been playing with prepubescent pee-pees probably since the days of Moses -- and little girls too. But shhhhhh. Don't talk about it. That would be "anti-Semitic" TM. Just how bad is this problem among Judaism's "holy men?" Grab a large bucket of popcorn and google: "Rabbi Sex Abuse." You'll be entertained (in a twisted sort of way) for weeks  as you plow through all of the horror stories. Not only does the silence of the Judenpress protect its randy Rabbis, the many pedo perverts of Jewish-owned Hollywood get a free pass as well. Compounding the hypocrisy with that quintessential "chutzpah" that the Tribe is so famous for is the fact that the morally ruined Church is now being financially bled by the very same usual suspects. From the Slimes' article: "If you were sexually abused as a child by a priest of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York, Cardinal Timothy Dolan wants to give you money. He announced a settlement program this month that will be run by an independent mediator, Kenneth Feinberg. It will review claims and decide on an amount, which church officials will not be able to alter or reject. The settlements will not be capped; the archdiocese has promised to pay whatever it takes, by selling assets or borrowing." By the way, if the name of that shyster Kenneth Feinberg (cough cough) rings a bell, it's because he was the wretched fiend who handled the hush money payouts to the families of 9/11 victims -- payments that came with a no-future-suit clause. No suits = no testimony = no potential discovery process of what really happened. Again, in a twisted sort of way, one has to almost "admire" the grand structure of the colossal scam this ghoulish gang has pulled off over the centuries, no, millenia. Oh if only this troublesome and talented tribe would direct their genius to the service of humanity, instead of to its debasement.   1- 9/11 cash man Feinberg is now shaking down the remnants of the Catholic Church of New York. 2- Rabbi Ephraim Karp of Cleveland was sentenced to 20 years for raping a young girl. (here) Just one of MANY documented cases 3 & 4 - Why no public attention to the abuse crisis within the Rabbinate?   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times that the Archdiocese of New York is paying out money to the kids that were molested. Boobus Americanus 2: You know. It's a damn shame. The priests I knew when I was a kid were solid men and great teachers. What the heck happened to the Church?        Sugar:  It wass a frickin' consspiracy! Christ-hating communist Jews and their ssodomite libtard dupes ssubverted it from within --- that'ss what happened!  Editor: Amen. * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com   2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3

MONDAY / OCTOBER 17, 2016

REBUTTAL BY As America approaches the Marxist milestone of $20 Trillion in debt, let us recall what Homo-Obongo, that bastard son of a communist whore with the Tranny husband, said about the Bush 43 deficits while campaigning back in 2008. Obongo: “The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion dollars for the first 42 presidents — number 43 added $4 trillion dollars by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion dollars of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic.” If Bush's $4 Trillion was "unpatriotic," then what shall we call Obongo's $10 Trillion?   Obongo still has 4 months left to crack $20 Trillion.   It was only months before the media-driven installment of Mr. and Mr. Obongo that the National Debt Clock had to be replaced in order to fit the extra digit necessary to write 10,000,000,000,000. Now, nearly 8 years later, we are due to surpass $20 Trillion -- which means that the reign of Obongo will have packed on about as much debt as all previous administrations combined! Apart from imposing higher taxes on future generations, the debt also contributes to the debasing of our currency because the main buyer of US Treasuries these days is the HNB (Hebrew National Bank). You see, boys and girls, if you or I were stupid enough to invest in T-bills, the purchase of said notes would be completed with pre-existing money. But when the HNB "buys" debt, the electronic funny-money is created out of thin air, putting us all on the hook for added debt burden, compounding interest and price inflation to boot. Let's dissect this latest bit of economic disinformation, brought to us by a female libtard ignoramus named Jackie Calmes, about the nature and dangers of government debt.   On TV and in print, stupid Jackie Calmes certainly isn't "calm" when bashing conservatives.   Calmes: Obama administration confirmed on Friday that a six-year run of declining annual budget deficits had halted: The shortfall for the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30 was $587 billion, an increase over last year in dollars and as a percentage of the economy. Rebuttal: Calmes is manipulating numbers here. As bad as a "$587 billion" deficit is, that's only about half of the true annual number. In addition to the budgeted money deficit (the $587 billion), there are the "CR's" -- continuing resolution bills. CR's keep the money flowing after the budgeted spending has run out. These stop-gap spending bills are now the norm to keep federal agencies running. Calmes: The up-tick, which had been projected last winter by government analysts, largely reflected the revenue loss from expiring tax breaks for businesses and individuals that Congress extended in December. President Obama had proposed to pair the tax cuts with some tax increases on wealthy Americans, to avoid adding to the deficit, but Congress refused. Rebuttal: Ah yes. The good old "deficits-are-caused-by-the-rich-not-paying-their-fair-share" routine. This myth is easily dispelled by the fact that the Federal Government now extracts the back-breaking equivalent of $40,000 per household per year through various forms of direct and indirect taxation. It is welfare and warfare that are driving up deficits, not lack of taxes! Calmes: The $587 billion deficit for fiscal year 2016 is equivalent to 3.2 percent of the gross domestic product, the measure of the overall output of the economy. Rebuttal: Again, the lie of omission. The $587 billion does not include the added stop-gap spending that will push us over the $1 Trillion mark for the 8th consecutive year. Suppose a family budgets $800 pere month for groceries, but ends up recklessly spending $1600 month after month, year after year, the true monthly grocery expense is $1600, not the budgeted $800. Only in the land of DC-NY libtardism would the additional $800 be ignored as the grocery deficit is blamed on not enough salary. Calmes: While the tax cuts were the immediate cause of the return to rising annual deficits, Rebuttal: Bitch, please! The monster deficits have nothing to do with minor tax cuts or increases. You know damn well that it is the Department of Offense - which spends about as much on weapons and armies as the rest of Planet Earth combined - and the skyrocketing costs of Obongo Care and other welfare schemes that are driving our National Debt. Calmes: Budget shortfalls long had been forecast to climb unsustainably after 2018 because of the costs of an aging population. The number of people 65 years or older is expected to increase nearly 40 percent in a decade, driving up spending for Medicare and Social Security. Rebuttal: Which is why the Fed-Med Complex morphined my non-suffering and non-terminal mother to death last year -- but I digress.     1- Warfare, welfare, and non-means-tested government support of the elderly -- NOT the lack of taxes on "the rich" are the factors driving us into deeper and deeper debt. 2- Deficits KILL! Read "The Morphine Genocide" -- by M S King. Just published! (here)   Calmes: Mr. Obama, in his budgets this year and in past years, unsuccessfully proposed significant tax increases for the wealthiest taxpayers and some corporations to offset spending initiatives and reduce deficits. Rebuttal: Oh if only those stingy Republican'ts would bend over for King Obongo even more than they already have! Just a few more taxes on "the rich" and the deficits will just go away without any adverse side-effects on investment and hiring. Sure, Jackie -- anything you say. Calmes: Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, proposes some of the same tax increases as Mr. Obama has, and more. But the new revenue is intended to pay for her spending plans, including for education, not to reduce deficits. Rebuttal: An interesting bit of truth here. Killary's spending schemes will be at least as bad as Obongo's.  ... $30 Trillion here we come! Calmes: Mrs. Clinton’s Republican rival, Donald J. Trump, would cut taxes by trillions of dollars mostly for the wealthy and corporations even as he has vowed to sharply reduce the federal debt. His promises to reduce spending enough to cut the debt and pay for his tax cuts have been disputed even by conservative groups, because Mr. Trump has said Medicare and Social Security are off-limits for cuts. Rebuttal: What wacky Jackie doesn't seem to understand, or perhaps does understand but will not say, is that if Trump can achieve his targeted GDP growth numbers, revenues to the Treasury will pour in to the point where the deficit can be overcome without significant spending cuts. That being said, Sugar and I, er, we The Editorial Board at The Anti-New York Times would prefer to see massive cuts in spending in addition to massive cuts in rates.   Even with high levels of government spending, economic expansion alone can still erase deficits and payoff debt. John F Kennedy, a Democrat icon, understood this phenomenom. "In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now. The experience of a number of European countries and Japan have borne this out. This country's own experience with tax reduction in 1954 has borne this out. And the reason is that only full employment can balance the budget, and tax reduction can pave the way to that employment. The purpose of cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus." Democrat President John F Kennedy, Dec 14, 1962, New York Economic Club   Calmes: Military spending increased little over all, and dropped for military operations and maintenance. Spending on nutrition for the poor, formerly known as food stamps, was down 4 percent. Rebuttal: You see what the sneaky little rodent did here? In closing her piece by citing "little increases" in military spending and a tiny reduction in welfare spending, Calmes leads the superficial reader away from rightly thinking that spending is the cause of deficits and debts. She and her communist buddies want us to blame it all on "the rich not paying their fair share." This article is pure commie crap masquerading as objective fiscal analysis. For that reason, it's probably good enough for a Pulitzer Prize, if not a Nobel Prize in Economics.   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times that the deficit is creeping up again. Boobus Americanus 2: Until the rich start paying their fair share, this problem will never be solved.        Sugar:  You sstupid %432&@!!! The IRS is already raking in trillions of dollars year after year after year!  Editor: It's funny how libtards, wealthy or not, never add extra extra money to their own tax payments. * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com   2016 / Quarter 3 is here!     Available at Amazon / 2015: Quarters 1-4  / 2016: Q 1-2-3

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 14, 2016

REBUTTAL BY As much as Sugar and Mike, er, the distinguished Editorial Board of The Anti-New York Times would like to get off the tiresome subject of the QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show), Sulzberger's Slimes won't allow us to. Day after day, the fallacious front page is filled with nothing other than anti-Trump venom, followed by additional hit pieces in the national and editorial sections. Orange Man is all that they write about these days. Even the crosswords puzzles are anti-Trump! (just kidding).   We learn today that the First Tranny has gotten into the act. Headline:   Voice Shaking, Michelle Obama Calls Trump Comments on Women ‘Intolerable’   "Voice shaking," eh Michael Mooochele? Must be from all those estrogen injections. Of course, the fact that some of the "rappers" that he/she/it has invited to the White House "sing" about violence, cop killing and even rape (here) doesn't pain the penis-concealing beast at all.        1 & 2: Hello Mr. Robinson. Is that a gun in your underwear are you just happy?   3: Who let the dog out without its make-up ask? Woof -- woof -- woof.   Another headline, for a story which openly accuses Trump of "sexual assault," shouts:   After Donald Trump, Will More Women Believe Their Own Stories?   "After Trump?" What about after the accused RAPIST Bill Clinton and his cover-up-after-the-fact partner Killary Clinton? Should we not believe the stories of Juanita Broderick, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey et al? At worst, Orange Man was a covetous dog in younger days. Bill Clinton was a violent sex predator. See the difference, Sulzberger? Of course you do!     Why are the multiple accusers of Kill & Killary Clinscum not worthy of being believed?     Still another story implies that a supposedly "slipping" Orange Man is engaging in desperate "conspiracy theory" TM with his warning about voter fraud. Headline:   Donald Trump, Slipping in Polls, Warns of ‘Stolen Election’   You know, it's funny. Whenever Vladimir Putin wins an internationally observed, tightly monitored free and fair election, the seditious scum at Sulzberger's Slimes are among the first to repeat the false claims of a "stolen election" proclaimed by "the Russian opposition." But when the wrong guy - in this case, Trump - brings up the topic, it's dismissed as "racist" TM and "conspiracy theory" TM.   We could go on and on pointing out the easy-to-see hypocrisy of one anti-Trump story after another after another. But it's getting old, so we'll leave that task to the Drudge Retard. The much more important higher truth that "normie" conservatives / alt-right are missing is this: the Piranha Press war on Orange Man is being waged primarily because he will have none of World War 3 with Russia and China. Russian nationalist and Putin ally Vladimir Zhirinovsky sums it up for us:   "Americans voting on November 8th must realize that they are voting for peace on Planet Earth if they vote for Trump. But if they vote for Hillary, it's war. It will be a short movie. There will be Hiroshimas and Nagasakis everywhere."   To which we would add: ... to be followed by The New World Order in its final dictatorial form - assuming there is something left to build upon.     1 & 2: In saying the things that Putin, for geo-political reasons, cannot always say out loud, Zhirinovsky is playing the role of "bad cop." You can be sure that both his endorsement of Trump and his warning of nuclear war were green-lighted in advance by Putin.   3: Zhirinovsky has appeared on Russian TV programs, trashing Killary in the strongest terms while praising Trump.   Boobus Americanus 1: The New York Times is really going after Donald Trump. There is hardly any other news in the paper anymore. Boobus Americanus 2: There does seem to be a bit too much bias in favor of Hillary.        Sugar:  Ya know the bullsh!t is piling up high when even thesse two asss-clowns can ssmell it!  Editor: Perhaps this will backfire on the Establishment. Let's hope. * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

TUESDAY / OCTOBER 11, 2016

! Today's rebuttal about McCain the Insane will be shorter than usual, but no less powerful than usual. We have urgent personal affairs to tend to (don't worry, nothing bad) and probably won't be back in action until Friday.

REBUTTAL BY So, the oh-so-honorable and pure John McCain the Insane was so offended over Orange Man's demeaning use of the P-word that he felt compelled to withdraw support from his fellow Republican. From the Slimes piece: "Senator John McCain, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, withdrew his support on Saturday for Donald J. Trump as the Republican Party descended into chaos. On Friday, a recording was released showing Mr. Trump speaking about women in lewd and degrading terms." Well, three cheers for Soros' darling McCain for taking such a bold stand against "lewd and degrading terms" for a certain region of the female anatomy. There's just one problem, Senator Senile. It's this excerpt from "The Real McCain," by Cliff Schecter -- an excerpt that you declined to refute (here) when you were asked about. From the book: "Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain's intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain's hair and said, "You're getting a little thin up there." McCain's face reddened, and he responded, "At least I don't plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt."  Can "youse guys" say: "hypocrisy!" Of course you can. Evidently, Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press cannot.   1- McCain dumped his first wife for Cindy -- a much younger beer heiress who he called "cunt" IN PUBLIC.  2- Schecter's research was not refuted, and is consistent with McCain's well known record of publicly abusing Senate colleagues. 3- McCain the Insane and Killary --- two evil, Russia-hating, warmongering, Soros ghouls make eyes at each other.   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that John McCain has withdrawn his support of Donald Trump because of his crude remarks. Boobus Americanus 2: Good for him. That type of vulgar discourse has no place in our civic life.        Sugar:  Aw sshut the #@$% up, you de-balled pusssy!  Editor: Dammit Sugar! If you don't clean up your act, you're gonna be a de-clawed pussy! -- (as in pussycat, that is) * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

MONDAY / OCTOBER 10, 2016

REBUTTAL BY Much better this time Orange Man, much better. You hit that nasty hag hard -- real hard -- yet in a calm measured tone. And flying in those women that Kill and Killary Clinscum had abused so horribly added a delightful touch of showmanship to the QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show). Now, permit us to drop the other shoe, because there were still many lost opportunities and an evident lack of preparation on your part. Here's how your humble reporter would have responded at key points of the debate.   On Russia and Putin: Don't apologize or deny the fact that you wish to get along with the Russians. Instead, inform the American public of what Killary wants to do. Try this: "Hillary. You were all for the war in Kosovo. You were for the disastrous war in Iraq. You were for the war in Libya. You were for the ongoing civil war in Syria, and now, it seems like you want to take us to war against Russia, a nuclear superpower that can wipe us off the map just as easily as we could them. Why?  (turn to audience) Ladies and gentleman, Hillary Clinton is a dangerous warmonger (with emphasis). If she is elected President, folks, you had better build an underground bunker because World War III will become a real possibility." On the Iran Nuclear Deal: The FOXtards are already in your corner and the Jews are 90% opposed to you. Your constant hating on peaceful Iran was effective in the GOP Primary, but for the general election, it only makes you sound like the warmonger. Just drop this subject altogether.   The fact that so many millions of voters remain ignorant of the possibility of World War III and Killary's record of warmongering is unacceptable. Trump MUST change that perception.   On Bill Clinton's Sex Abuse: You went hard on this, but you still refused to take it to the max. Terms like "abuse" and "sexual harassment" will hurt the Clinscums, but the one word that you refuse to say -- RAPE -- is the one that will score the knockout punch. Damn your girly advisers and go all the way! Try this: "Some of the women that you and your co-President husband abused are here in the audience tonight. Among them is Juanita Broderick -- (motion toward the ladies) Juanita, stand up please. Juanita's story is a sad one. She claims that days after your husband brutally bit her lip and raped (with emphasis) her, you personally intimidated her into silence. Hillary, is that true? And if it's not true, I want you to face your accuser and tell her she is lying. Go ahead Hillary. Call her a liar."  Can you imagine if Orange Man had done that? The whole country would have been buzzing about it for days. He may not get this chance again.   The perverted evil bastard and Chelsea Hubbel, er, Clinton squirmed when Orange Man mentioned the "abuse" and the presence of the abused ladies in the audience. It was a powerful moment, however, much to the relief of the Clinton Crime Family, the "R" word was still not used. Damn!   On the Missing E-mails: Too often, people in a certain profession or with a certain level of understanding make the mistake of assuming that what may be "common knowledge" to them is therefore known by everyone else. This is big mistake! You see, whereas the Republican-FOX News base may understand that Killary deleted E-mails to conceal her criminal money-making dealings for her crooked foundation, the average Boobus Americanus is under the impression that she just "made a mistake" by using a private serve when she wasn't supposed to. "What's the big deal?" -- they reckon. It's up you to inform them, Orange Man. Try this: "Hillary, even if we were to dismiss the use of a private server as an innocent "mistake" (use air quotes), the fact that you deleted so many of them after receiving a subpoena suggests that you were hiding criminal activity surrounding that phony charity scam that you and your husband run. Take for example the donations for the victims of the Haitian earthquake -- donations that your corrupt organization stole from the poor people of Haiti. I met with prominent members of the Haitian-American community, and some of them are also here tonight. (motion toward audience) Francois, Jean -- please stand up. (turn toward Killary) Hillary, I want you to either explain to these good people what you did with the earthquake money which you stole, or tell them that they are liars. Go ahead, Hillary."   * Haitians were not there last night.   On Taking Tax Deductions Ya did good on diffusing this nonsense about the deductions and "not paying taxes." Dropping the names of the evil Warren Buffoon and the even eviler George Soros was music to our ears! But you keep missing the obvious one-liner about tax deductions that would shut this Bolshevik bitch down hard. Try this: "Hillary, you're one to talk about tax deductions. You and your co-President husband deducted your used underwear!" (make a funny face)   1- Vague talk about Killary's "missing E-mails" is confusing to simple-minded Boobuses.  The issue is the criminal activity that could be proved by the subpoenaed E-mails. The Clinton Foundation is a money laundering fake charity which, among other scams, stole Haiti's earthquake relief money -- an easy scandal to understand. 2- The utter hypocrisy of Killary's underwear tax write-off would also be perfectly simple for the Bobbuses to understand. *************** As we said, Orange Man did well, but had Mike & Sugar been coaching him, the above bold plays would have dealt devastating blows. Ya can't go 1/2 the way or even 3/4 against the forces of evil. Only bare knuckled audacity, executed calmly and methodically (not like Sugar's approach) will overcome the Jewish Juggernaut behind Killary. As it stands, Killary herself is still standing, and she shouldn't be.   Boobus Americanus 1: What did you think about that debate last night? Boobus Americanus 2: It certainly was down and dirty. Trump held nothing back this time.         Sugar:  Not dirty enough Boobusss! That evil bitch needss to be kicked in her p---- !  Editor: Sugar! Now you sound like Orange Man! * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 7, 2016

REBUTTAL BY Before we get into this latest piece of anti-Putin excrement vomited out by the vile specimen of "Pulitzer Prize winning" TM vermin, Thomas L. Friedman, (cough cough) please join the Editorial Board (that's Sugar and me) of The Anti-New York Times in sending a Happy Birthday shout out to Bad Vlad himself.    "Happy frickin' Birthday Pressident Putin! -- Na Zssdorovie!   Freakman's opening volley needs no rebutting for it is a shocking caricature of itself in which he admits that Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press can and should invent and publish dis-informative propaganda about Putin and Russia. Take a whiff of the fantasy story that Freakman concocts as an example of what he would like to see planted and published by the government-media complex to which he belongs, even though he admits such a tale would be false: "You may have missed this story, so I am repeating it as a public service: MOSCOW, Special to The New York Times, Oct. 1 — A previously unheard-of group called Hackers for a Free Russia released a treasure trove of financial records online today indicating that President Vladimir Putin owns some $30 billion in property, hotels and factories across Russia and Europe, all disguised by front organizations and accounting charades. The documents, which appear to be authentic, include detailed financial records and emails between Mr. Putin’s Kremlin office and a number of his Russian cronies and Swiss banks. They constitute the largest hack ever of Mr. Putin. Russian censors are scrambling to shut down Twitter inside the country and keep the emails out of Russian-language media. At a news conference in Washington, C.I.A. Director John Brennan was asked if U.S. intelligence services had any hand in the cyberleak of what is being called “The Putin Files.” With a slight grin, Mr. Brennan said: “The U.S. government would never intervene in Russian politics, just as President Putin would never intervene in an American election. That would be wrong.” As Mr. Brennan left the podium, though, he burst out laughing. No, you didn’t miss this story. I made it up. But isn’t it time there was such a story? Isn’t it time we gave Putin a dose of his own medicine — not for juvenile playground reasons and not to instigate a conflict but precisely to prevent one — to back Putin off from what is increasingly rogue behavior violating basic civilized norms and increasingly vital U.S. interests." * Wow! Evidently, Putin (along with his not-so-secret admirer, Donald Trump) has got these gefilte-fish-eating greaseballs in such a state of hysteria that they are losing their cool and showing their cards. That the Slimes "makes up" stories is nothing new, but for one of its most "respected" scribblers to openly call for such activity comes as a surprise, even to us. What Freakman is advocating amounts to the type of wartime disinfo-journalism which the American press (including mega moguls David Sarnoff and William Paley (Paloff), in collaboration with the government, engineered during our involvement in World War II.   During World War II, NBC's then-owner David Sarnoff (cough cough) was given the rank of "General" for his important role in spreading war propaganda throughout German-occupied Europe. Soldier boy Sarnoff was so proud of his General's Star that he had it buried with him.  * CBS's then-owner William Paley (cough cough) was given the rank of "Colonel" for his service in psychological warfare operations.   There goes that ominous word again -- war -- and its not just us "conspiracy theorists" TM saying it anymore. From Freakman's fecal fable: "Putin “is at war with us, but we are not at war with him — both the U.S. and Germany are desperately trying to cling to a decent relationship,” remarked Josef Joffe, editor of Die Zeit, a weekly German newspaper and a leading strategic thinker in Europe. No one should want to start a shooting war between great powers “in the shadow of nuclear weapons,” Joffe told me. Freakman immediately transitions to that oh-so-quintessentially Jewish "yeah-but" with false accusations of "war crimes" and "cyberattacks" : "But we also cannot just keep turning the other cheek. Putin’s behavior in Syria and Ukraine has entered the realm of war crimes, and his cyberattacks on the American political system threaten to undermine the legitimacy of our next election." Freakman doesn't openly call for a shooting war, of course. That would be too obvious at this moment. Rather, his objective here is to have the government-media complex ratchet up the already deceitful propaganda war against Russia to an even higher level as a necessary prelude to the start of the actual shooting. Once Putin has been sufficiently vilified by the strategic lies which Freakman is openly demanding, the dumb-as-dirt public can easily be fooled by either a false-flag attack (another 9/11), or a provocation-induced attack (another Pearl Harbor). That's Friedman's deadly, and we do mean deadly game here, and he needs to have his key punching fingers chopped off and and his lying forked tongue ripped out for it. (metaphorically speaking, of course) The consequences of war, depicted below, are all just fun and games to a "tough guy" fatboy POS like Freakman who probably never even experienced a fist fight or a wrestling match in his entire pampered life. Lord, give us the strength to keep on confronting and exposing this Satanic evil each day without "losing it."   * * *   Boobus Americanus 1: In today's New York Times, Pulitzer Prize winner Thomas Friedman suggests launching a propaganda war against Vladimir Putin to counter his propaganda. Boobus Americanus 2: Hmmm. Fighting propaganda with propaganda. That's a clever suggestion -- and it might be a better approach than to have a shooting war with Russia.         Sugar:  Boobuss! You goofy frickin' @$^#&%!  Learn your hisstory! The falsse flag attack and then the sshooting always follow the propaganda!  Editor: Exactly Sugar! The USS Maine, The Lusitania, Germany's unavoidable and justified invasion of Poland, Japan's justifiable attack on Pearl Harbor, the Tonkin Gulf incident, the green-lighting for Iraq to invade Kuwait, the 9/11 attacks --- all war-triggering events which were  preceded by vilification propaganda of the targeted country. * COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

THURSDAY / OCTOBER 6, 2016

REBUTTAL BY We have been viewing the recent fawning by the "alternative right" over this fake, phony fraud Julian Assange of WikiLeaks with a mixture of amusement and amazement. With bated breath, the likes of Disinfo Wars, the Drudge Retard and Not-So-Brightbart have been eagerly awaiting the mother of all document dumps that would sink Killary once and for all. One promised dump date after another after another has passed with ASSange failing to deliver as promised. Of course, even if WikiLeaks was a legitimate group of activists, what good would come of these dumps if the Piranha Press buries them anyway?   Dumb-asses or part of the game? Alt-Right stars like Alex Jones and Pretty Boy Paul Watson speak of dangerous operatives like Julian ASSange and Edward SnowJob as if they were legitimate.   The idea that Sulzberger's Slimes would pump up a "whistleblower" who could damage the candidacy of that Golden Girl of the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) is absurd on its face. ASSange himself now admits this. From the article: "He (Assange) dismissed speculation that the documents related to the United States election would contain information intended to damage the candidacy of Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee. The idea that “we intend to harm Hillary Clinton, or I intend to harm Hillary Clinton, or I don’t like Hillary Clinton, all those are false,” Mr. Assange said. Thanks for nuthin', ASSange! Far from being Killary's nemesis (in spite of her harsh sheep-dipping comments against him), ASSange and then-Secretary of State Killary were key co-conspirators behind the "spontaneous" uprisings of the deadly "Arab Spring" that caused so much chaos in Tunisia, Yemen, Libya, Egypt and Syria, among others. ASSange himself has even claimed credit for planning and triggering the Arab Spring! (here) Of course, there were many other agents helping the egomaniac ASSange. When targeting a nation for Globalist takeover, the way the ghoulish game of "leaks" works, with certain variations depending on the actual project, is as follows: Start with the following ingredients: A ton of American cash from the CIA and/or George Soros Small army of undercover CIA agents Controlled "Human Rights /Pro Democracy" NGO groups Idealistic "Western wannabee" college brats Easily manipulated do-gooder "libtards" Professional signs & banners written in English Bribable / blackmailable journalists Bribable / blackmailable politicians Bribable / blackmailable academics Corrupt Union bosses Violent "Agent Provocateurs"     After a few years of CIA-NGO infiltration, subversion and brainwashing of students; damaging "leaks" serve as the perfect triggering mechanism and smokescreen for the pre-planned civil unrest and/or "civil war."   With the players in place, WikiLeaks then "leaks" embarrassing secrets about key officials within the target government. The bought-and-paid-for local CIA  journalists run with the "leaks." Many pissed-off citizens will then join forces with the CIA-NGO-Student rent-a-mobs. Agents roll out "spontaneous" banners and protest signs, written in English. The western Piranha Press (always led by Sulzberger's Slimes) assists the uprising by puffing it up as a "popular" and "spontaneous" reaction to corruption / tyranny / voter fraud etc. When "the whole world is watching", an incident will be staged -- often involving fake blood, fake tear gas, and photo shopped images. The destabilized target government soon loses support among some of its own people as well as governments abroad. Violent agent provocateurs continue to FORCE the police into violent acts. This embarrasses and destabilizes the government to the point where it becomes de-legitimized in the eyes of "the world community" TM. Traitorous "opposition" politicians collaborate with the US, UN, & EU to "pressure" the "oppressive" target government into submission. The threat of economic sanctions, "no-fly zones", bombing, or even an armed "rebel" uprising often forces the government to either bend to Globalist wishes, or to step down and call for new elections.   But if the "Color Revolution / Spring" should fail, then it's time for direct military action -- as we are seeing now in Syria. And the whole bloody mess began with the cover story of "leaks" from some geeky guy who, we are told, the PRC can't control (rolling eyes sarcastically). This then is the sinister fiend that the alt-right nitwits are waiting for to deliver us all from the evil of Killary Clinton. Give us a break!   Former Italian President Silvio Berlusconi was targeted for removal because of: 1: His close personal friendship with Vladimir Putin; 2: "Denial" TM of Climate Change" TM; 3: Good relations with Qaddafi of Libya; 4: Opposition to the immigration invasion of Italy.       ASSange's devious dump on Berlusconi triggered the colorful Italian billionaire's downfall (here) and paved the way for Globalist agents Monti, and then Renzi to seize unprecedented power in Italy. Southern Italian ports are now being flooded with "migrants" who then fan out throughout borderless Europe.    So then, what is ASSange's strip-tease really all about? Your guess is as good as ours, but allow us to share two hypotheses with "youse guys."   Hypothesis 1- ASSange's repeated and deliberate failures to deliver the goods on Killary is actually intended to deflect from Killary's scandals by building up expectations and then deflating them. Boobus Americanus Voter will ultimately conclude: "They don't have anything on Hillary, after all."   Hypothesis 2- Perhaps ASSange will "leak" something about Trump -- a revelation that the Piranha Press will surely go into a frenzy over -- leaving the new alt-right fans of ASSange in the impossible position of having to counter-attack the very man they have been praying to for the past three months.   We shall know what ASSange's QFS 2016 plan is all about soon enough. Meanwhile, ignore this obvious criminal intelligence asset masquerading as some crusader for "human rights" TM and "transparency" TM. And while you're at it, ignore the conspiracy-researcher-turned-conservative-mainstreamer Alex Jones and his Muslim-hating new sidekick, Paulie Boy Watson. Stick with Sugar and me --- we won't steer ya wrong.   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Julian Assange of WikiLeaks plans to release important information just before the election. Boobus Americanus 2: Boy, him and that Snowden fella have got some really big balls to defy the U.S. government like they do.         Sugar:  Boobuss! You stupid @$^^&%!  Assange and Snowden WORK FOR the government!  Editor: The deep-state shadow government, to be more precise. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

TUESDAY / OCTOBER 4, 2016

REBUTTAL BY Wow! Count em'! A dirty dozen of anti-Trumpian hit pieces contained in a single issue! As regular researchers of old Slimes' archives dating back to 1900, we confidently say with authority that no personage in American history has been subjected to the level of Sulzbergerian slime now being spewed at Donald Trump (often referred to by us as "Orange Man" when he pisses us off with his many imperfections and errors.) Even the late great Senator Joseph McCarthy never got it this bad and this blatantly. Back in the old days, the ever present bias of "the paper of record" was always present, but not so "in-your-face." In order to maintain the illusion of objective journalism, a surprising amount of truth often made its way into this all-mighty Jewish journal of gibberish -- albeit in the inner pages. Entire press releases from Hitler's Foreign Ministry were published, as were the opinions of Joe McCarthy's defenders.   In the old days, a few balancing truth nuggets would occasionally surface in Sulzberger's Slimes ...     1- The August 28, 1939 headline of the Hitler-hating New York Times confirmed that Hitler sought to avoid war with Britain & France. An entire communique from Hitler was published on the front page 2- December 8, 1941: The entire post-Pearl Harbor Declaration of War by Japanese Emperor Hirohito was published by The Times -- even though it was a damning indictment of FDR's government.   The art of the con job back then involved the publishing of a few solid inner page truths, which would then be overwhelmed with twice as many front page lies. Nonetheless, the gold nuggets of truth were there and can still be mined. Today, however, the Jew York Slimes is all lies (including the deadly lie of omission) all the time. One will search in vain for even a single token defense of a Trump or a Putin. It's not that the Sulzberger Dynasty has grown any more evil in its intent to deceive. The deceptive nature of these Bolshevik beasts is no worse today than it was 30, 60, 90 or even 120 years ago. The difference is that Boobus Americanus is now dumber and more communistic than ever. Therefore, there is no longer any need to satisfy the inquisitive reader with the occasional and symbolic inner page sheep-dipping of "the other side of the story." Today's "college educated" libtard is so insular and "group-minded" in his "thinking" that he cannot even imagine that there even is another side of matters.     With his readership already having been pre-brainwashed at today's Marxist-dominated colleges, Arthur Sulzberger has a much easier job of public deception than his great grandfather did.   You see, the uppity sophist Slimes has always appealed to the "college educated" reader. But back in the day when universities (and high schools) still taught the classics and the basics of rational thinking, the Sulzberger-Ochs Crime Family knew that any propaganda campaign that was too outrageously and too one-sidedly bold would not work on its readers, even if those readers had a liberal bent. Hence, the veneer of confidence-building "objectivity" in the form of an occasional truth bomb was always a necessary element of the grand deception. But so many of the post 1980 "college educated" generation are now so far gone -- so stupid -- so brainwashed -- so prideful and puffed-up on their own sophistry -- and so degenerate in both intellect and morality, that the Sulzbergers now feel safe in abandoning any pretense of objectivity. In the past, the Slimes would never have run 12 hit pieces in a single day against anyone -- not even pre-war Hitler! It would have been too damn obvious. These demonic sons-of-bitches want their war with Russia and China, and they are determined, no, obsessed with stopping Donald Trump from stopping that war. All the while, arch-criminal Killary Clinscum get a free pass (with zero hit-pieces) in painting Trump as a dangerous warmonger! Un--Freakin'--believable! --- But not to Slimes worshippers. Those ass-clowns will believe that dog-shit sandwiches are nutritious and delicious if Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press tells them so.     No Republican't has dared to so boldly challenge "the paper of record" as Orange Man has done.       Boobus Americanus 1: The New York Times had wall-to-wall coverage of Donald Trump today. None of it was good. Boobus Americanus 2: The dirt that is coming out on Trump is amazing. These revelations should sink his campaign.        Sugar:  Boobuss! You group-thinking lemming! The dirt on Trump iss not "coming out." It's being dug out or concocted by the biassed Sslimes.  Editor: Boobus can't see the difference because he lives in his own closed world of make-believe.   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

MONDAY / OCTOBER 3, 2016

REBUTTAL BY Oh how magnanimous, how altruistic, how empathetic, how noble and how humble of two-time Pulitzer Prize winner Nicholas Kristoff to call out his own race of White people for not "getting it" when it comes to the related issues of race and discrimination. Agree with his argument or not, you must admit, it does take a bit of character and courage to publicly go against your own kind and admit what is right, or at least what appears to be right in one's sincerely held view.     Kristoff ain't White! He's a @#7^54 ....   As you can see, irony is lost on Sugar the Mad Cat. Of course we know what ethnic group Mr. Kristoff belongs to (cough cough), and of course we see through his little charade of trashing the hated White (European) people which he and his light skinned Khazarian-Asian supremacist brethren have cunningly camouflaged into. Unfortunately, too many vulnerable Whites fall for his "nobody here but us White guys" routine before themselves becoming "magnanimous-altruistic-empathetic-noble-humble" -- in a self-hating guilt trip type of way.   Kristoff's column amounts to just another typical whine about how "racist" TM that Donald Trump and his followers are, and how bad "discrimination" TM against Blacks still is....blah, blah, blah. It's all so pathetically predictable and so played out that it's not even worth reviewing line by line. The only reason we selected this piece for rebuttal today is to call attention to the "we Whites" trickery that these characters always use. From Kristoff's column: "In contrast, we whites seem curiously unwilling to shoulder any responsibility for our own part in racial inequity. If we’re so concerned with “personal responsibility,” shouldn’t we show some? If Donald Trump wants to make this election in part about race, then let us really talk about race problems in all their complexities. And we whites could spend less time pointing fingers and more time looking in the mirror. "We" -- eh Kristoff? You dirty sneaky two-faced shape-shifting maggot! And for the handful of "bruthas" and "sistas" that read The Anti-New York Times, you already know by now that this son of Satan is not your friend either!   More examples of the "We White guys" acting routine...        "The point is not to interpret whiteness but to abolish it." -- Harvard professor and self-described "race traitor" Noel Ignatiev (cough, cough), author of "Race Traitor" and racetraitor.org * "If you want to know if racism is a problem in your country, you might not want to ask White people." If you want to know if racism is a problem in your country, you might not want to ask white people. Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/t/tim_wise.html -- Tim Wise (cough, cough), author of "White Like Me"   Looking through the prism of Kristoff's red-hot hatred for the big bad White Man, we may better understand his long forgotten libeling of an innocent scientist named Steven Hatfill, (here) whom Kristoff had falsely and maliciously accused of having mailed out the deadly "Anthrax letters" of September, 2001 -- letters which were clearly sent out by a Jew in order to false-flag frame the Arabs. The false accusation leveled by Kristoff and an malevolent activist named Barbara Rosenberg (cough cough), turned poor Hatfill's life upside down and inside out. Beginning in mid-2002, Hatfill became the whipping boy of the Piranha Press after TV cameras showed FBI agents in biohazard suits searching his apartment. His home was repeatedly raided by the FBI, his phone was tapped, and he was kept under surveillance for more than two years. Dr. Hatfill was also fired from his job at Science Applications International Corporation -- all on the basis of the evil Rosenberg / Kristoff smear and the firestorm it kicked up.   An innocent man, wrongly defamed for the Zionist anthrax letters, was put through hell by the vicious Yellow Journalism of "Pulitzer Prize winner Nicholas Kristoff.   When finally cleared of the false charges, Hatfill filed lawsuits against the periodicals and journalists who had framed him. He sued the New York Slimes and Kristoff in particular for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress in connection with five of Kristoff's most vicious columns. Incredibly, The Jew courts dismissed this suit, finding that Hatfill was a "public figure" -- ignoring the fact that it was Kristoff who made him a "public figure!" In 2007, Hatfill did settle a similar libel lawsuit against Vanity Fair and Reader's Digest for an undisclosed amount, after both magazines agreed to retract any implication that Hatfill was involved in the anthrax mailings. Son of Satan Kristoff belongs in jail for what his racial hatred against Whites led him to do to Dr. Hatfill in 2002.  Yet here he remains, still defaming Whites again and again and again -- while constantly and sanctimonoiusly reminding his readers of his own "whiteness."    .... Un--Freakin'--believable!   F -You too, Albert! (cough cough)     Boobus Americanus 1: I read again an op-ed column in the New York Times today by Nicholas Kristoff about thow we Whites still cannot appreciate the institutionalized racism and discrimination that America continues to inflict upon African-Americans. Boobus Americanus 2: Indeed. The discrimination is not always easy to see from our perspective of privilege. Kristoff is very noble to take up this cause.        Sugar:  You stupid @#$@!! Krisstoff ain't noble and he ain't White! He jusst wantss our kind blended out and exterminated!  Editor: What do you mean "our kind?" COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com

ANTI-NY TIMES HOME PAGE