|
|
|
ANTI-NY TIMES ARCHIVES / PREVIOUS MONTHS
.
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines ___________________________________________________________________ DECEMBER, 2017 1 FED RESERVE NOTE ___________________________________________________________________
"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!" *****************************************
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
REBUTTAL BY
 Though the news of the death of actress Heather Menzies
is of no concern to The Anti-New York Times, it does provide us with a good opening for shedding some light
on the immense Jewish propaganda value of the classic 1965 musical drama, The Sound of Music, starring, in addition to a young Menzies, the "A-listers"
Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer. What made SoM such an
effective propaganda vehicle was that the poison was delivered within the body of a heartwarming story of an Austrian-Aryan
family, and greatly sweetened by the beautiful singing of Julie Andrews and the children. As a song which
Andrews herself made famous in Mary Poppins goes: "a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine
go down." And indeed, in the case of SoM, that "medicine" was the not-so-subtle "anti-Nazi"
contextual message of the film.    What's not to love about
a musical about a beautiful, happy and loving Aryan-Austrian family singing in the Alps with angelic voices? Plenty! Leave
it to "the usual suspects" to drop a poison pill inside a pretty package.
The Sound of Music was produced and directed by Robert Wise (cough cough) as an adaptation of the 1959 Broadway show of the same name, composed by Richard Rodgers (cough cough) and Oscar Hammerstein II (cough cough), and screenplay by Ernest Lehman (cough cough). Based on the memoir The Story of the Trapp Family Singers by Maria von Trapp, the film is about Maria, a young Austrian woman who is sent to the villa of a retired naval officer and widower, Captain Georg von Trapp, to be governess to his seven children. After teaching music to the children, she marries the officer.
   USING ARYAN IMAGERY TO
ATTACK THE HATED ARYANS Behind the facade of the beautiful Germanism of the Sound of Music lurked the usual suspects ---
Rodgers, Hammerstein, Wise and Lehman. While away on their honeymoon, the Captain learns that Globalist puppet Austria has been annexed by Germany in the Anschluss (March, 1938). The couple returns to their home, where a telegram awaits informing the Captain that he must report to a German Naval base to accept a commission in the German Navy. Strongly opposed to the big bad "Nazis" ™ and the Anschluss, the Captain tells his family they must leave Austria immediately. Many of the von Trapp's friends are willing to accept the new regime, including Rolf -- who Liesl von Trapp is devastated to see has joined the big bad Hitler Youth. That night, as the von Trapps attempt to "escape," they are stopped by a group of big bad Brownshirts ™. When questioned, the Captain tells them that they are headed to a festival to sing. That night at the festival, the von Trapp family slips away and shelters at the nearby abbey, where nuns hide them in the cemetery crypt (rolling eyes -- only a Jew could write this crap). The big bad Brownshirts ™ soon arrive and search the abbey. The family is discovered by Rolf -- Liesl's ex-boyfriend. Upon seeing Liesl, Rolf hesitates, thus allowing the family time to "escape," by taking a car. When the big bad Brownshirts ™ attempt to pursue the "fugitives," they discover their cars will not start because the nuns have removed parts of the engines. The next day, after reaching the Swiss border, the von Trapps make their way on foot into Switzerland, where they will live, love, laugh and sing happily ever after. The hyped-up film became the highest-grossing film of 1965. By November 1966, SoM had
become the highest-grossing film of all-time—surpassing Gone with the Wind -- and held that record for five
years. SoM was also popular throughout the world, shattering box-office records in 29 different countries!
Both the Broadway and Hollywood versions
spread the anti-Nazi propaganda thick. In Image 2, Captain von Trapp rips up the German flag. Image 3. Rolf's decision to join the Hitler Youth and become a big bad Brownshirt ™ cost him the love of Liesl
von Trapp.
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE ANSCHLUSS The post WW 1 Versailles Treaty had broken up the Austro-Hungarian Empire and forbid the new nation of Austria from uniting with Germany. The Anschluss of 1938 was a voluntary incorporation of Austria into the German Reich. The merger with their Germanic brothers was supported by 99% of Austrians and Germans, but opposed by the puppet Austrian government instituted by the Allies after World War I. But after seeing the great success of Germany, there was no stopping the Austrians desire to unite with their happy brothers and sisters. Without a shot being fired, German forces moved in unopposed and were greeted as liberators by the joyous Austrians. As a brotherly gesture towards the Austrians, The Great One (that's Hitler for all you newbies and normies) invited Austrian troops to march inside of Germany as well. When The Great One himself came to visit the land of his youth, he was given a hero's welcome by the frenzied Austrian crowds. Not surprisingly, the western Globo-Zionist media portrayed the joyful unification as: "Germany Conquers Austria.” So, if indeed the real-life Captain von Trapp actually was "anti-Nazi," -- it was only because he was part of the out-of-touch, insensitive, well-connected, well-fed, top 1% ruling class of puppet Austria, and not part of the starving masses who absolutely adored The Great One. That's the truth about the big bad Anschluss. And no amount of Broadway (cough cough) or Hollyweird (cough cough) bullshine, mixed in with angelic-sounding "do-re-me-fa-so-la-te-do" and beautiful Alpine imagery can change it. .   Over-joyed Austrians turn out to welcome The Great One, their hometown-boy-turned-liberator. Image #3, The Great One lays a wreath at the gravesite of his parents. *  Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in The New York Times today that actress Heather Menzies passed away. She was one of
the singing von Trapps in the Sound of Music. Boobus
Americanus 2: Indeed she was. For its cinematic content, musical score and anti-Nazi
cultural significance, the Sound of Music remains a truly immortal film.
Sugar: Sshut the #@&^ up, Boobuss! Sseruiussly, just sshut
the #@&^ up! Editor: ♪ ♩The hills are a-live,
♪ ♩
with the sound of Su-gar. ♪ ♩ COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
TUESDAY / DECEMBER 26, 2017
|
NY Times: For One Far-Right Politician, Forgetting Germany’s Past Just Got Harder
A political art group built a replica of the Berlin Holocaust Memorial in Bornhagen, Germany. Next door is the home of Björn Höcke, a far-right politician who called the memorial “a monument of shame.”
|
REBUTTAL BY
Nothing that happens in the occupied Germany of Marxist Mamma Merkel shocks us anymore, particularly when it comes to the legal persecution of "Holocaust Deniers" ™ -- some of them in their 80's and 90's! But as this sad story reveals, even that class of Holocaust-believing / Holocaust-acknowledging thought-criminals which we might refer to "Holocaust Forgetters" or "Holocaust Mitigators" are subject to persecution and social ostracism as well. These are the folks who do not actually "deny" the Holohoax, but simply argue that, after 3/4 of a century, the time has come for Germans to move on from self-flagellation. Though it is still legal to express such a sensible view, the state-enabled social abuse which such expressed sentiments can trigger can make the punishment for "Holocaust Forgetting" (™ pending) very painful nonetheless.
1. Ursula Haverbeck, 89, sits in prison for denying the Holohoax. 2. Horst Mahler, 82 next month, also sits in prison for denying the Holohoax. 3. Meanwhile, the Frumpy Frau floods Germany and Europe with criminal invaders who are given free housing and welfare benefits.
From the article: "No one in the village saw it coming, least of all Björn Höcke, a quiet and well-liked local father of four who also happens to be Germany’s most notorious far-right politician. Last January, at a rally in Dresden, Mr. Höcke questioned the guiding precept of modern Germany — the country’s culpability in World War II and the Holocaust — calling on Germans to make a “180 degree” turn in the way they viewed their history. Germans were “the only people in the world to plant a monument of shame in the heart
of their capital,” he said, referring to the Holocaust memorial in Berlin. And then, one recent Wednesday morning, Mr. Höcke woke up in his rural home to find the Holocaust memorial outside his bedroom window: 24 rectangular concrete slabs, one section of the original monument, rebuilt to scale on the property immediately neighboring his. The only difference: The slabs had been rotated 180 degrees." (to mock Höcke's words and to face his home."
Wow. Just wow.
1 & 2: A MASSIVE (5 acres, 2,711 concrete slabs) eyesore to remember the Holohoax sits in the heart of Berlin. 3. Björn Höcke -- while not "denying" the Holohoax -- dared to express his misgivings about the Berlin monstrosity. Now, his whole village neighborhood is being legally terrorized by extremely well-funded Communists who have erected a smaller replica of that eyesore just outside his window, as the state "looks the other way."
It turns out that a Communist "artist collective" known as the Center for Political Beauty purchased the neighboring property solely for the purpose of shaming Mr. Höcke. The replica of the Berlin memorial, put up overnight on November 22 of this year, not only harasses the Höcke family (including children), but has put an unwanted spotlight on Bornhagen, a scenic village of 309 inhabitants. Local hotels are already seeing cancelled and diminished bookings. Philipp Ruch, co-founder of the group which erected the memorial and, on paper, the Höcke family's new "neighbor," had this to say: “We wanted to remind Mr. Höcke that he can turn German history however much he likes, it doesn’t change. “He broke the mother of all taboos, he challenged the founding narrative of modern Germany and he got away with it. We learn from our past so it does not happen again. That is who we are. That is our strength,” For months, the artistic terrorists scouted out the quiet village. They registered
a business and then rented the property next to Mr. Höcke’s home. The building of the Holocaust memorial was shielded
from the view of neighbors by a large tent, said to be hiding a surprise for an engagement party.    1.
The Höcke home -- Imagine your family waking up one
morning, looking out the window, and seeing a pile of protest stones facing your home, and alerting every Communist in the
world as to where you live. 2.
The
quiet village
of Bornhagen is now a battlefield in a cultural-political war. 3. The extremely
well-funded (Soros? CIA?) Communist "German" Philipp Ruch (face covered in Holohoax "ashes") leads "The Center for Political Beauty," whose mission statement
describes itself as "an assault team that establishes moral beauty, political poetry and human greatness while aiming
to preserve humanitarianism." Ever since the imposition of World War I upon the peace-loving
people of Germany in 1914 -- with the exception of the wonderful pre-war 1930's years under the stewardship of The Great One
(that's Hitler for all you newbies and normies) -- "the usual suspects" and their henchmen have continued
to subject Germany to various forms of mass abuse (war, hunger blockades, atrocity propaganda, economic extortion,
territorial theft, ethnic cleansing, genocide, mass rape, military occupation, political subversion, cultural degradation,
psychological assault / self hate, Turd World invasion etc). And as this blood-boiling story of what the "powers
that be" are allowing to happen in a quiet German village clearly shows, the century-old torture of the German nation does show any signs of abating
any time soon. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an article in The New York Times today about a group of German artists who actually bought
a property right next door to a crypto Holocaust Denier, and then erected a replica to the Berlin Holocaust memorial on it! Boobus
Americanus 2: Ha ha ha ha. That's funny!
Sugar: Boobuss, you heartlesss basstard! It's NOT
frickin' funny!!! How would YOU feel if we erected a monument
to your sstupidty directly acrosss the sstreet from where you live -- sso that your sstupid wife, kidss and neighborss would
be forced to look at it each day!!! Editor: Boobuses are utterly
incapable of empathy -- unless the sentiment comes to them upon command from the Piranha Press. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
SUNDAY / DECEMBER 24, 2017
|
USA Today: Charles Barkley sarcastically thanks G.O.P. for new tax bill: 'Sorry, poor people'
|
REBUTTAL BY
Though this story did not appear in Sulzberger's Slimes,
for the sheer ignorance
and buffoonery which it displays, we just couldn't pass this up. Just two weeks after warning Alabamans not
to vote for the "white separatist ™,"
Roy Moore, the suddenly political ex-basketball star, Charles Barkley, is using his TV announcer forum
to comment on economic policy. Stick to basketball, Charles.
1. Barkley went "all-in"
for the communist Demonrat Doug Jones in Alabama -- publicly slandering Republicans Steve Bannon
and Roy Moore as "white separatists ™."
(here) 2. Barkley poses
with Doug and Louise Jones, and their openly sodomite son, Carson Jones. 3. Now Barkley
is using his TV announcer position to attack Trump. Could this ass-clown be setting the stage for a career in politics?
Here is what this stupid ape (*use of the term "ape" refers to his size and primitive intelligence, not his race ) had to say about the Trump tax cuts: "They (Republicans) said it’s going trickle down … I’m going to trickle my fat ass down to the jewelry store to get a new Rolex. They’re not going to pass it to nobody. Thank you Republicans, I knew I could always count on y’all to take care of us rich people, us one percenters. Sorry, poor people. I’m hoping for y’all, but y’all ain’t got no chance.” First of all, Charles, and Now as for you "trickling your fat ass down to the jewelry store to get a new Rolex," -- that is an astonishing declaration of hypocrisy on your part. It's not that there is anything wrong with you buying another Rolex, but if you truly believe that these tax cuts are a bad idea, then why not refund the U.S. Treasury like an obedient little Marxist would? Write the Feds a check. They'll accept it. Better yet, why not give your windfall to charity? But if you insist on buying a new top-line Rolex, understand that the commission on one of those babies is going to make some lucky middle class sales clerk very, very happy. Ever think of that? Ya big dummy! Moreover, your Rolex purchase, combined with other Rolex purchases by other millionaires, keeps the 2,800 worldwide employees of Rolex Inc employed -- not to mention the secondary incomes earned from jewelry store owners, managers sales people etc. And what about the share holders of Rolex Inc., many of whom are middle class folks with retirement plans and pensions invested in the stock market, which includes Rolex. Those people should also say "Thank you, Republicans," right?
   Idiot Barkley's purchase will make some sales clerk very happy! Lots of middle class people in America and Europe depend upon the continued success of Rolex Inc.
You see, Charles, every dollar that you retain means one more dollar operating in the productive market sector of the economy, and one less dollar being squandered in the parasitic government sector. There are only three things that you can do with that extra dollar, and all three work toward the improvement of economic conditions for society, far more so that government waste. Let's look at the three option you have, Charles. 1. Buy more stuff: The purchase of luxury items supports millions of people who work in the luxury industry. Wealthy people distribute wealth to others whenever they make purchases of such luxuries. 2. Give to charity: If an individual donates, say, 10% his income to good causes (as many wealthy people do), then a "tax cut for the rich" must necessarily lead to an increase in his charitable donations. 3. Invest in business or the market: Increasing the capital flow -- the seed corn -- into the private economy is also a good thing. Smug, arrogant, ignorant libtards can scoff at "trickle down" all they want, but the reality is that private enterprise and investment are what creates jobs, not taxes! Anyway you slice it, Charles, extra money in the private sector benefits the overall economy. Extra money in the
public sector hinders it. And Charles, one more thing --- as the Tax Calculator linked down below will show
--- low and middle income folks will indeed be seeing a noticeable increase in their paychecks come February, when the withholding
amounts are adjusted on payrolls. Our only "complaint" is that we wish the tax cuts were much deeper and coupled
with massive spending cuts too -- but that's another subject. So shut your stupid mouth and focus on announcing basketball games for the mostly White fans who, inexplicably, continue to watch these America-hating thugs run up and down a court. Leave economics to the grown-ups.
TAX REDUCTION IS A WIN -- WIN -- WIN Increased sales, increased charity or increased investment. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read a great quote Charles Barkley today denouncing the Trump tax plan. He said he was going to take his fat ass down to the jewelry store
and buy a new Rolex with the tax cut. Boobus
Americanus 2: My wife sells watches in a jewelry store. I sure hope he goes there to buy it! Ha ha ha. But I do agree with him
that trickle down never works.
Sugar: Boobuss, you frickin' retard!!! Can you not notice the inherent contradiction in what you jusst ssaid? Editor: It'ss
too complicated for him. But he WILL notice the extra cash in his February paychecks. Maybe that will stir up a few brain
cells ----- maybe. MERRY CHRISTMAS TO OUR READERS / SUPPORTERS!    TAX SAVINGS CALCULATOR https://www.calcxml.com/calculators/trump-tax-reform-calculator COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
THURSDAY / DECEMBER 21, 2017
|
NY Times: The Bitcoin Boom: In Code We Trust
NY Times: How the Winklevoss Twins Found Vindication in a Bitcoin Fortune
NY Times: A Bitcoin Hedge Fund’s Return: 25,004% (That Wasn’t a Typo)
NY Times: I Was Wrong About Bitcoin.
Here's Why.
|
REBUTTAL BY
Starting back in 2014, we began noticing more and more requests to post a "Bitcoin" button that would allow readers to donate to TomatoBubble.com with the hot new "crypto-currency" worldwide payment system. Bitcoin and other rapidly emerging cryptos are a form of "decentralized" digital currency, as the system works without a Central Bank or a single administrator. The Bitcoin network is person-to-person, with transactions between users taking place directly through the use of cryptography only. Bitcoins can be exchanged for other currencies, products, and services. The transactions are automatically verified and recorded in a publicly distributed ledger called a "blockchain." At first, it seemed like a good way to work around PayPal and fly under the IRS radar, but we just never got around to getting involved because we figured the Feds would eventually catch up to such a "peoples' currency" and shut it down anyway. But now, lo and behold, Bitcoin mania is being heavily promoted by the great and the good of the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) -- so much so that a single $1 of Bitcoin purchased a few years ago is today worth about $65!
Hyped by the Piranha Press and blessed by the Rothschild Central Banks, digital crypto-currencies -- Bitcoin foremost among them at this time --are exploding in popularity and "value."
Suckers worldwide are now purchasing Bitcoin with credit cards and even home loans (just as in the allegorical story of "The Great Tomato Bubble" (here) for which this site is named). The fact that Wall Street Hedge funds have joined the Globalist media mania bubble of Bitcoin constitutes "prima facie" (a $10 Latin legal term for "first face") evidence that there is a sinister agenda behind these digital currencies. Should there be any lingering doubts over such a suspicion, these headlines ought to dispel them: Coindesk: (December 17, 2017): 2018: The Year Central Banks Begin Buying Cryptocurrency (here) CNBC: (December 18, 2017): Central Banks could hold bitcoin and ether for the first time in 2018 (here) Quartz
Index: (September 25, 2017): Central Banks considering launch of official cryptocurrencies
(here) The fix is in, boys and girls. What is the motive here, you ask? Flashback time:
(February 24, 2016): Getting Rid of Big Currency Notes Could Help Fight Crime (some excerpts) As part of his oh-so-high-minded effort to "fight crime", Andrew Rosenthal (cough cough), that shadowy little Wicked Weasel of Oz who styles himself as "The Editorial Board", has come out swinging in favor of former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers (cough cough) recent call to ban the $100 dollar bill. Gotta stop them drug-dealers, eh Andy? (rolling eyes, sarcastically). This all-of-a-sudden push to ban big bills is a harbinger of the dark days ahead. It's significance is huge -- all the more so now that Rosenfilth of the New York Slimes is pushing it (just days after the Washington Compost came out in favor of the ban as well).
1. Andrew Rosenthal (cough
cough) of the Slimes' "Editorial Board" wants an end to cash. 2. Old Time Magazine cover
-- Thank God for great men such as Robert Rubin (cough cough), Alan Greenspan
(cough cough), and Lawrence Summers (cough cough). 3. The brilliant plan to ban big bills is going
to save the world's children from the drug dealers. (rolling eyes) "Few Europeans use the 500-euro note, and most Americans rarely encounter the $100 bill. Yet hundreds of millions of these notes are in circulation around the world... officials in Europe and elsewhere are proposing to end the printing of high-denomination bills. Getting rid of big bills
will make it harder for criminals to do business ... The president of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, recently said the bank is considering getting rid of the 500-euro note ($557)... though the central bank plans to keep the 200-euro and 100-euro bills. Critics who oppose such changes say the big
bills make it easier for people to keep their savings in cash, especially in countries with negative
interest rates. But these are relatively minor burdens compared with
the potential benefits of reducing criminal activity and tax evasion. There are now so many ways to pay for things, and eliminating big bills should create
few problems."   PayPal
ran a TV commercial during the 2016 Stupor Bowl ---the images and slogans from which speak for themselves.
The end game is to kill paper money. End of flashback excerpt * The end-game behind the crypto craze is to usher in a GLOBAL
digital currency which, in time, will be very much "centralized." In the meantime, this could also be part of a
sophisticated CIA money-laundering or "pump & dump" operation. In the long run, we do
not think that the Globalists will be able to pull off such an ambitious leap toward one-world tyranny -- not with Messrs.
Putin, Xi and Trump around. But the Central Banksters sure as hell are gonna try when they start issuing their own digital
currency, as is expected in 2018. Amazing. Now who, say, 30 years ago, could possibly have envisioned the rise of digital
global currency in 2018? Hmmm? An prophetic excerpt from a 1988 Economist
article (as quoted from a 2014 issue of Bitcoin Magazine): "THIRTY years from now (i.e. 2018), Americans, Japanese,
Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping
with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let's say, the phoenix. The phoenix
will be favored by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today's national currencies, which by
then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.” “An
even more ambitious solution would be to move to a truly global currency, along the lines of Keynes’s “bancor”,
that would circulate alongside countries’ own currencies and would offer a store of value truly disconnected from
economic conditions and policies in any country. To achieve this, one would need to set up a global monetary institution
that would issue the global currency depending on global economic conditions, and that could act as a global lender of
last resort. It would need to have an impeccable (“AAAA”) balance sheet, and governance arrangements that
engender widespread credibility and acceptability.” “As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still.” “The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix
so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. (here) Wow. Just wow. Now have a look at the cover of that very same 1988 Economist issue,
on the left:   Rothschild's "prestigious"
Economist magazine -- January, 1988. Note the future date on the coin (2018),
and the similarity in appearance between the 'Phoenix" coin and the "Bitcoin" logo, and what could be easily
be interpreted as the Twin Towers. Does this mean that the plan is to use the crypto bubble to "burn" the world's
currencies so that the one-world money system can rise like that phoenix on the cover? And
by the way, the 2014 Bitcoin Magazine article quoting that 1998 Economist Magazine article, was not citing the old story about
one-world currency as a warning. But rather, as a good idea, preferably with Bitcoin serving as the coming world currency,
and not necessarily the Economist's "phoenix." The headline and a quote from the Bitcoin piece: A World Currency – Not a New
Idea (February 25, 2014)"At
this point we could be talking about Bitcoin or any new cryptocurrency out there today. Let’s continue as the article
talks about what could lead to this “New World Currency”. Next is a statement that will get the attention of the Bitcoin user. Remember, this was written in January 1988. 'As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still.' Here we might still be talking about Bitcoin. ...This 1988 article
was obviously ahead of its time. It shows that a new kind of world currency is not a new topic of conversation. And the
mention of 2018 looks eerily realistic as we watch things unfold today.(2014) --- (here) You see, the gift
of "prophecy" comes easy when you are the one running the show! There
is no doubt about this one, boys and girls. Bitcoin was never a "spontaneous" digital currency of "the people"
that just "took off." It has been, from the start, a tool of the usual suspects and the play is only
getting started. The year 2018 promises to be very interesting. Stay tuned. .    1. Months
before "The Good War" had even ended, the post-World War II monetary system was cooked up at Breton
Woods by the US Communist Harry Dexter White (cough cough) and the UK Fabian Socialist and the known
sodomite John Maynard Keynes. Keynes advocated a world currency, which he named "Bancor," but he
realized that the idea was still too radical for those times. 2. Bitcoin Magazine with a "Guy
Fawkes" anarchist on the cover? -- A sure sign of a CIA operation. 3. Slime Magazine cleverly
hyping Bitcoin as if it were some sort of anti-government uprising of the people -- another sure sign of a CIA
operation. * This just in: Wall Street Journal: (December 22, 2017)Bitcoin Plunges 25% in 24 Hours in a Cryptocurrency Market Rout (here) * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today that Bitcoin is taking the world by storm. Boobus
Americanus 2: I know. I just bought some.
Sugar: Boobuss, my idiot friend -- you'd buy a frickin' dog-sshit ssandwich if the Jew York Slimess declared
it to be tasty and nutritiouss. Editor: (palm to face, sighing, shaking head) --- All you Sugar
groupies out there with your sycophantic fan e-mails are the reason why I can't control her anymore.
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
WEDNESDAY / DECEMBER 20, 2017
|
An artist’s rendering compares Kumimanu biceae, an extinct giant penguin, to a human diver. Kumimanu stood 5 feet 7 inches and weighed 220 pounds. It is among the earliest known penguin species.
NY Times: Ancient Penguins Were Giant Waddling Predators
BY CARL ZIMMER
|
REBUTTAL BY
This latest bit of "Evolution" ™ comedy takes us to the Southern Hemisphere for a study of a recently discovered "giant penguin" which the eggheads of academia assure us really did exist -- "57 million years ago" (rolling eyes). Science writer and Yale "fellow" Carl Zimmer (confirmed cough cough) brings us the error-ridden story. Parkas and snow boots on, boys and girls. Into Sulzberger's frozen slime we go.
1. Zimmer's alleged "areas of expertise" are Evolution ™ and parasites (takes one to know one?). 2. His latest tale of giant penguins is full of holes.
Zimmer: The 57-million-year-old fossil ... Rebuttal: These fossil ages are pulled out of thin air. The crackpot "theoretical scientists" assume that layers of sediment form and petrify at a constant rate -- not taking into account the fact that a massive flood, tsunami or other cataclysmic event can accumulate "millions of years" worth of future rock in just a matter of days. Zimmer: ... a long-beaked penguin that stood 5 feet 7 inches tall and weighed about 220 pounds. “It was as tall as a medium-sized man,” said Gerald Mayr, a paleontologist at the Senckenberg Research Institute in Frankfurt, Germany, and lead author of a report announcing the discovery. Rebuttal: How exactly did Professor Mayr manage to calculate the height and weight of this creature from some "57 million year old" bone fragments? Zimmer: By comparison, the tallest living species, the emperor penguin, reaches about four feet in height. Kumimanu biceae, as the fossil was named, would have towered above the emperor. Rebuttal: Assuming that Mayr's estimates are correct, the fact that a breed (not species) of penguin may have been a foot & a half taller than the penguins we see today would constitute no more of an example of "Evolution" ™ that the existence of 7-foot tall humans and 5-foot tall humans; or Great Danes and French Poodles. Once again, the evolutionists conflate variation within a species (observable) with cross-species "Evolution" ™ (non-observable). Zimmer: In 2014, another team of researchers estimated that a 34-million-year-old species stood six feet tall, but they based that estimate only on two bone fragments. Rebuttal: Though it pertains to another case, this is is a very telling admission that speaks to the general sloppiness of modern paleontology. These grant-seeking academic
ass-clowns will often take a single bone fragment, plug it into a rigged create-a-beast "computer model," and then
leap into the wildest conjectures and reckless inferences imaginable. Zimmer: Both its age and its size make Kumimanu important to understanding the astonishing transformation that turned a lineage of flying birds into flightless swimmers. Rebuttal: How did penguins turn from fliers into swimmers? Fliers must have light hollow bones in order to achieve and maintain lift. But deep-diving penguins must have solid heavy bones in order to withstand depths of 1,000 or more feet. Tell me, Zimmer, when the first penguin made the switch from flier to deep-sea diver, how did the hollow bones suddenly turn into solid ones? How did momma flying penguin with hollow-bones suddenly hatch a swimming baby with solid ones? Zimmer: The 18 modern species of penguin are impressively adapted to aquatic life. Rigid, blade-shaped wings enable them to shoot through the water at up to 22 miles an hour. Rebuttal: Now we get into the mystery
of integrated parts. For the penguin to transform from a flier into a swimmer, not only did the bones have to instantly solidify,
but the wings had to instantly become "rigid" and "blade shaped" at the exact same moment in time
-- all by blind chance, none of it ever observed. Zimmer: But their adaptations to water have also left them unable to fly. Rebuttal: How did penguins survive during the "transition" stage when they would have been unable to fly (as bones were solidifying) and unable to swim / dive (because bones still weren't thick enough and wings weren't rigid enough)? Got any evidence of the trasitional "missing link" versions? Answer: No!
1. On the basis of a few bone fragments, paleontologists and their magic computer models have been known to "recreate" entire never-before-seen dinosaur "skeletons." 2. Dog breeds differ greatly among themselves too. It doesn't prove that Great Danes "evolved" into Poodles. 3. Transforming from fliers into deep sea divers would require a massive and instantaneous re-writing of the penguin's voluminous genome.
Zimmer: While penguins may look profoundly different from other birds, their DNA points to a close kinship to such species as albatrosses and petrels. Rebuttal: DNA commonalities do not prove "kinship." All living creatures have common DNA for the same reason that pizza pies and tacos have common origin from tomatoes, cheese and flour. There is a finite amount of proteins and elemental "stuff" on this planet -- so we all share many basic ingredients. That doesn't mean that the species are "related" to each other from a common ancestor.
Zimmer: Birds accumulate mutations in their DNA at a roughly clocklike rate, allowing scientists to estimate when their lineages branched apart. Rebuttal: Total fiction. The acquisition of "DNA mutations" or added / deleted chromosomes has never been observed, let alone "clocked." The "clocklike rate" of accumulated "mutations" is based on a cucko-clock which exists only in the warped minds of these mad scientists. Zimmer: Studies suggest ... Rebuttal: "Suggest,"
eh Zimmer? Zimmer: ... that penguins diverged around the time of the mass extinction that struck the planet about 66 million years ago. Rebuttal: The oft-repeated / never questioned "66 million years ago" mantra is not only a baseless fabrication, but an indication of the occult / Satanic origins of the "Evolution" ™ hoax. (6 million Jews - 66 million years ago extinction - 666 number of Satan etc. Zimmer: A combination of massive volcanic eruptions and an asteroid impact are believed to have been responsible for the global catastrophe. Rebuttal: "Are believed to have been" responsible, eh Zimmer? Zimmer: Among the victims were giant marine reptiles and dinosaurs (with the exception of birds, which are feathered dinosaurs). The mass extinctions marked the end of the Mesozoic Era and the beginning of the Cenozoic, which continues today. Rebuttal:
It is as amazing as it is amusing to read these fantastic narratives. With absolute certainty, these crackpots speak
of unobserved and unproven events as if they were describing the details of last night's ballgame. Zimmer: The new fossil penguin, Kumimanu, was discovered from bones packed in a rock on a New Zealand beach. Rebuttal: You see how the scam works? They base the age of any given fossil upon the ridiculously miscalculated age of the rock in which the fossil embedded in. The fossil is "57 million years old" because the rock is "57 million years old." By the way, the embedding of bones in a rock is also a sign of flash-flooding, not gradual, multi-year sediment build-up. Think about it.
   1. Just because a taco
and a slice of pizza have common ingredients, does that prove that they randomly "evolved" from a common ancestor?
2. The "science" of rock dating is deeply flawed to begin with. Dating fossils from the erroneously-aged
rocks then leads to circular reasoning.
3. Darwin's scam is thoroughly and humorously exposed in "God vs Darwin"
by M S King. (here)
Zimmer: To see how it was related to other species, the scientists drew an evolutionary tree and found that Kumimanu and Waimanu belonged to its farthest branches. Rebuttal: So "they drew an evolutionary tree," eh Zimmer? And what, pray tell, was this theoretical artwork actually based on? Zimmer: “We already knew penguins were around, and flightless,
just a few million years after the extinction,” said Daniel T. Ksepka, ... “The new fossil shows they achieved
immense sizes very rapidly as well, which is cool.” Rebuttal: (palm to face, shaking head, deep sigh) Zimmer: “It’s an educated guess that makes sense, but there’s no rock-solid evidence,” said Dr. Mayr. Rebuttal: "An educated guess" -- "no rock solid evidence." * At most, what has been discovered here was that some penguins were bigger than others. But they would still have been penguins, not another species and hence -- no "Evolution" ™. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read a fascinating piece the New York Times science section today about a recently discovered giant
ancestor of the penguin. Boobus
Americanus 2: The miracles of Evolution never cease to amaze.
Sugar: Boobuss, you atheistic cretin! Do you actually believe that a creature as beautiful
as me could have randomly "evolved" from pond sscum? Sseriously now. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
TUESDAY / DECEMBER 19, 2017
|
NY Times: In One New Jersey Town, Pending Tax Changes Create Anxiety
|
REBUTTAL BY
The demonic communists and their criminal co-conspirators in the FNM (Fake News Media) of the state of New Jersey, where The Anti-New York Times is headquartered, are in peak fear-mongering mode over the modest Trump tax-cut package for 2018. You see, in high property / high state-income-tax states like New Jersey, New York, Commiefornia etc, the proposed $10,000 write-off cap for local and state taxes will end up reducing the amount of money which taxpayers can deduct from their taxable income for Federal tax purposes. So now, all of a sudden, the loony Left is oh-so-concerned about some people (mainly the wealthy) having to pay higher taxes. How conveeenient, as the old Church Lady of Saturday Night Live fame used to say.
When it suits his purposes, "the usual suspect" can suddenly switch from being a tax & spend "soak the rich" Marxist to an anti-debt, Boston Tea Party tax rebel. How conveeenient!
Get
a load of this fearful propaganda which some of my very own family, friends and acquaintances have soiled their panties over
-- that is until "In many ways, Livingston, NJ is a microcosm of all the forces that will collide in the heavily taxed towns that ring New York City when the proposed tax law takes effect. These are places that have drawn residents willing to stretch their budgets to cover big mortgages and high property taxes in exchange for good schools and a comfortable lifestyle, understanding that they could deduct their local levies and reduce their federal taxes. But the tax bill would radically alter that equation, forcing potentially painful choices in towns like Livingston. For some, the math just may not work anymore, driving them and their neighbors to reconsider the classic suburban dream." Jeff Lajqi, the owner of a Jew Deli, chimes in with his ill-founded concerns about the Republican plan to limit how much property tax he can deduct on federal returns: "If they’re raising the taxes, you know what’s going to happen: Everyone’s going to raise prices. Raise my taxes, I raise your challah." Oy vey, Jeff! Did you whine like that when your Jewish-Democrat-dominated town and state raised the property and state taxes to the bloody moon in the first place? Probably not. But have no fear Mr. Lajqi. There will be no need to raise the price of your bagel and lox after all -- although, knowing "youse guys" as well as we do, we suspect that you will probably raise prices anyway and then blame it on Trump! Had the superficial scribblers at Sulzberger's Slimes made the effort to perform a few
5th grade level calculations, they would quickly see that in spite of the $10,000 cap on deductions for local & state
taxes, only the wealthiest New Jerseyians will end up paying a bit more in taxes. As the chart below clearly illustrates,
the cutting of Federal rates (on top of the increase in the standard deductions) will offset the reduced write-offs. *Middle Class brackets highlighted
It only takes 60 seconds of research and 5th grade math skills to debunk the fear-mongering of the Fake News.
Case Study: Let 's
say that the two-income Smith family of high-tax Bergen County, NJ has $100,000 of taxable income and that their property
plus state income taxes total $20,000. With the new $10,000 cap, they would lose a whopping $10,000 worth of deductions. At
a current rate of 25%, that amounts to an increased tax bill of $2,500. ($10,000 x .25) Damn Trump!!! Right? Not so fast. Here's what Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press are deliberately downplaying. With the coming rate reduction for the Smith's bracket (22%), they would owe the Feds $22,000 instead of $25,000, a savings of $3000 -- $3,000 gained - $2,500 lost = a total annual tax reduction of $500. Now that is still less of a tax cut than that of a counterpart residing a low-tax / no state income tax state, but it is still a reduction nonetheless. We calculated many different scenarios and estimate that the only people who will be paying noticeably higher taxes are those households with incomes above $250,000 living in homes valued at $1 million or higher. That's unfortunate for that small minority, but why should they be subsidized by the low-tax states? Besides, most of the really affluent New Jerseyans are either Jewish or old-line Puritan blue-blood libtards anyway. F em'!
The Slimes cherry-picked and photo-featured anxious (and presumably wealthy) Jewish business owners to whine about how the coming tax plan is going increase their tax bills by a few shekels (if at all) --- Above: George Press (cough cough), Walter Levine (cough cough) and Shawn Klein (cough cough) Personal exemptions will also
be lost with this program, but the standard deduction is going up to compensate for it, at least partially. That might not
offset the lost exemptions totally for some people, but again, when combined with the lower rates it's still a net cut for
all but the very top earners, albeit chump change. As for fears over future
Demonrat tax hikes on top of the lost deductions, now that is a very real concern. And so, for all of our dear home-owning readers in libtarded Marxified high-tax states like New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Commiefornia etc, be not troubled. It's just the Fake News doing what they always do, namely, lying through their evil stinking teeth! You will still get some of the pathetic crumbs which Trump and the Republican'ts will so graciously drop down to us hungry goldfish, or, at worst, end up getting a slightly smaller "refund" in 2019. On a separate note, we would like to point out that if we gave up the Global Empire and its associated military costs, shut down the Departments of Education, Interior, Labor, Transportation, Commerce (just for starters), kick all recent immigrants off of welfare / Medicaid, and take away Socialist Security and Medicare from elderly millionaires and elderly immigrants who just arrived as "chain migrants" -- we could knock the income tax rate down to zero for about 90% of all working people, and not have to fret over a few lost "write-offs." Now that would really "make America great again" -- at least in the economic sphere.
Unless and until the warfare / welfare states are dismantled and the U.S. Constitution restored, the tax cuts bestowed upon us lowly peasants will only amount to crumbs. That being said, almost everyone in America -- even those in the high tax states who will lose some deductions -- will still be paying less under the Trump plan. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an article in the New York Times today about how Trump's tax plan is going to rape all of us
here in New York and New Jersey. Boobus
Americanus 2: Trump and the Republicans are really sticking it to the Northeastern
blue states.
Sugar: Boobusss, you $#&^%@ idiot!!!
If you hadn't elected all those communisst Democratss to your sstate legisslature, you wouldn't have to worry about losst
tax deductionss related to your ssky-high local and sstate taxess. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MONDAY / DECEMBER 18, 2017
|
NY Times: Where Wind Farms Meet Coal Country, There’s Enduring Faith in Trump
By CLIFFORD KRAUSS
No place is more likely than this one (Glenrock, WY) to benefit from President Trump’s promise to make the United States a dominant energy force in the world, or more likely to be disappointed if the promise is not kept.
|
REBUTTAL BY
As is typical of the condescending communist clowns
at Sulzberger's Slime, this featured propaganda piece attempts to sympathetically portray Donald Trump's supporters in the
American heartland (Wyoming) as decent, hard working, struggling folks who simply aren't educated enough to come
to terms with the realities of "Climate Change"
™ and the Green Economy. From the article: "Woody Ricker, a 38-year-old technician at Duke Energy’s Top of the World wind farm outside Glenrock, comes at the energy picture from a different perspective. But his views, like those of many wind workers here, are surprisingly similar to those of workers whose jobs rely on coal. For years, he has been teased by friends for having an “Obama job” in an area where wind farms are seen as taking business from the coal industry. But Mr. Ricker, like most of his neighbors in and around the town of Douglas, isn’t particularly convinced that humans have much impact on climate change."
Woody Ricker, a technician at Top of the World, has been teased for having an “Obama job” in an area where people see wind energy as encroaching on the coal industry.
Did you notice the clever insinuation that non-belief in "Climate Change" ™ is obviously motivated by economic concerns related to coal industry? (Existential Fallacy and Appeal to Motive Fallacy). And why would it be "surprising" for a man employed in the Wind Farm business to not believe in "Climate Change?" ™ He still has to eat and feed his family, doesn't he? This patronizing Manhattan attitude is actually more offensive than being called a "deplorable" or a "racist." ™ As for these inefficient eye-sores dotting America's Midwestern landscapes and slaughtering all manner of birds, a reader named "Mark" who lives in the farming area of Iowa wrote to us at TomatoBubble.com: "We have one of these windmills about 1/2 mile from our house. The small town I live near spent $450,000 to erect it and it only runs maybe 165 days a year. They've had to repair it 8 times since 2009 when it was installed. I absolutely hate them. They are subsidized by us and who will take them down out of the corn fields when they stop working? They don't last long enough to remake the electricity sunk into their manufacture. Yet the government pays out about $11,000 per year for each one placed on your farm. Many days the wind doesn't even blow. They are also dangerous for planes and birds, and sometimes a giant turbine will bust off. Eventually, somebody is going to get hurt. I hate them! Total waste in so many ways." Mark’s story may be anecdotal, but in this case, his personal observations are indeed representative of the broader failure of wind power. Both in terms of cheap energy and mass numbers of “green jobs,” wind power has failed, in spectacular fashion, to deliver what the greenies and the big investors promised. The inefficient wind-power industry is very expensive, passing its costs on to consumers and taxpayers while creating relatively few jobs.
A sin against God and Nature, all on the basis of a HOAX! Thousands of majestic American bald-eagles are being wind-o-causted -- a tragically poetic touch symbolizing the killing of America -- as coal miners lose their livelihoods.
Ironically, wind farms must still rely upon the burning of fossil fuels when the wind does not blow and the turbines fail to spin. All throughout Europe, domestic coal stations have been closed in order to meet carbon-emission reduction targets. So when the wind farms come up short, nations must import coal and oil. Apart from the fact that CO2 emissions are harmless and that manmade "Global Warming ™ / Climate Change ™ is a hoax, wind farms have neither reduced emissions nor the cost of electricity. On windless days, large customers may be shut off temporarily. While the poor and the elderly have been hardest hit by high electricity bills, the true beneficiaries of the wind scam are the wealthy investors receiving government welfare. Not only are the mechanical monsters expensive, ineffective, ugly and deadly, many have gone idle are costly to repair. Bob Adelman writes in the New American: Headline: 14,000 Idle Wind Turbines a Testament to Failed Energy Policies “When Element Power announced on April 10 the closing of a deal to build wind turbines for Blackrock in Ireland, nothing was said about the more than 14,000 other wind turbines lying idle around the world. Instead, Jim Barry, managing director for BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, expressed great pleasure at its new venture with Element. …. Those 14,000 wind turbines lying idle in California’s Altamont Pass, Tehachapin, and San Gorgonio areas and elsewhere around the world are testimony to the continuing and accelerating failure of hope over experience, funded with taxpayer monies. And these areas were selected as being “in the best wind spots on earth,” which are now, according to Natural News writer Jonathan Benson, just “spinning, post-industrial junk which generates nothing but bird kills.” Once those taxpayer funds are withdrawn, the real economics of maintaining these expensive monstrosities are so overpoweringly negative that they are left to rot — skeletons proving the fraud and deceit of the whole global warming meme.” He’s right, you know. The warmists can try to “fact-check” away these “inconvenient truths” all they want, but the reality remains: Wind farms do not generate electricity on a commercially viable basis. The fake industry survives only because of generous government subsidies, stolen from taxpayers and redistributed to wealthy investors, manufacturers and rent-seeking land owners.
Money-mad Globalist scum like Bill Gates, Warren Buffoon, Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Muskrat are all heavily invested in "Green Energy."
It’s an economic hoax, built upon a scientific hoax, built upon a geo-political hoax. In fact, it’s so bad that even the mainstream warmist media and wind industry publications have had to concede certain “inconvenient truths.” Newsweek: (April 11, 2015): What is the true cost of wind power? “As consumers, we pay for electricity twice: once through our monthly electricity bill and a second time through taxes that finance massive subsidies for inefficient wind and other energy producers. Most cost estimates for wind power disregard the heavy burden of these subsidies on US taxpayers. But if Americans realized the full cost of generating energy from wind power, they would be less willing to foot the bill – because it’s more than most people think."
Wind Power Monthly: (May 14, 2015) Annual blade failures estimated at around 3,800 “Bellamy, co-founder of the renewables advisory firm Aarufield Ltd, pointed out that blade failures are the primary cause of insurance claims in the US onshore market. They account for over 40% of claims, ahead of gearboxes (35%) and generators (10%). The wind industry also faces a struggle to secure the carbon fiber materials it needs for lighter and stronger blade designs, warned Bellamy. Possibly the biggest blade issue was faced by Siemens in 2013 when it was forced to curtail around 700 turbines worldwide. This was caused by a bonding failure in its B53 blade.” Add another mark to the minus-column of wind energy – all on the basis of a hoax that the "uneducated" heartland folks of America can clearly see, but that the "intellectual" libtards of New York cannot -- or, in the case of the Globo-Marxists, will not.
Ugly, dangerous, expensive and inefficient --- supported government mandates and taxpayers dollars --- all on the basis of a damn hoax. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an article in the New York Times today about Trump supporters in Wyoming coal country not wanting
to believe in Climate Change. Boobus
Americanus 2: One can't fault these people for fearing the economic changes that must take place.
We need to train these good people for the jobs of tomorrow.
Sugar: Boobusss, you platitude-sspouting
asss-clown!!! It iss YOU that needss to be trained how to think! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
FRIDAY / DECEMBER 15, 2017
|
N Y Times: Trump Urges Moore to Concede Alabama Senate Race
|
REBUTTAL BY
Right up until Election Day 2016, candidate Donald
Trump shocked polite society by warning about the potential of widespread, Demonrat-organized voter fraud. His accusations
really rattled Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press. A typical headline (one of hundreds!) New
York Times (October 23, 2016): Donald Trump’s Threat to Reject Election Results Alarms Scholars (here)After pulling off his improbable victory, Trump, in addressing the reason why he actually lost the popular vote, revisited the voter fraud controversy. More hysterical headlines from the Marxist scum at Sulzberger's Slimes: New York Times (February 13, 2017): Voter Fraud? Trump Has No Proof and Many Skeptics (here)
Trump's bare-knuckled post-election voter fraud "tweets" and public statements sent the Piranha Press into a frightened frenzy.
And finally, on May 11, 2017, just when everyone thought that Trump had "moved on" from this critically important issue, he sprung a big surprise by signing an Executive Order creating the “Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.” The Slimes and its Piranha Pack have been in feeding-frenzy attack mode ever since. New York Times (July 7, 2017): Even Some Republicans Balk at Trump’s Voter Data Request. Why the Uproar? (here)New York Times (July 22, 2017):
The Bogus Voter-Fraud Commission (here)New York Times (November 9, 2017): Voter Fraud Panel Is Sued Again, This Time by a Member (here)Considering Trump's crusade to expose Demonrat voter fraud, and in light of the many horror stories now emerging from the recently stolen Senate election in overwhelmingly Republican Alabama (illegal aliens being shipped from precinct to precinct on buses, Blacks from neighboring Mississippi coming in on buses, computer records being destroyed by court order, computer glitches etc), one would think that Trump and his Attorney General, former Senator Jeff Sessions from Alabama, would be all over this self-evident case of fraud. Instead, Trump, after having oh-so-"graciously" congratulated the communist victor, Doug Jones, is "urging" Moore to concede? What the frickety frack is going on here? From the article: "President Donald Trump called on fellow Republican Roy Moore on Friday to concede to Democrat Doug Jones in the Alabama U.S. Senate race, following the party's stinging loss in the southern U.S. state earlier this week. Moore, whose controversial candidacy was beset by allegations that he sexually assaulted or pursued teenage girls while in his 30s, has so far refused to admit defeat in Tuesday's election that saw Jones win by 1.5 percentage points with 99 percent of the ballots counted. The embattled Republican has made two statements since his loss, but has not conceded even as Trump and others have reached out to congratulate Jones, a former prosecutor, on his win. 'I would certainly say he should,' Trump, who endorsed Moore in the final stage of the campaign, told reporters at the White House."
   1. In 1985, a young Jeff Sessions aggressively, yet unsuccessfully prosecuted the "Marion 3" for organizing voter fraud in Alabama (here). Session thus KNOWS what goes on in Alabama. 2. The "Marion 3" and their Marxist-Libtard supporters cried "racism" over Sessions' prosecution. 3. Why are the anti-voter fraud crusaders Trump & Sessions going along with this farce in Alabama?
A bit of basic Holmesian deduction here, boys and girls. Analyzing the bizarre Trump / Sessions non-reaction and total non-support for Roy Moore's recount efforts leaves us with just two possibilities. The more obvious one being that a weakened Trump has sold his soul to the DC "swamp" -- collaborating with GOP Senate Leader Mitch McConnell to block the principled conservative Moore from entering "the club." This would also explain Trump's tepid "support" for Moore in the closing weeks of the campaign. The other possibility here is that Chess-master Trump and the military / law enforcement "white hats" behind him set an elaborate trap in Alabama by pretending to "look away" as the Soros-Obama operation took the bait. What if, this time, every aspect of the election fraud was carefully observed and thoroughly documented beyond doubt? What if Trump's quick "congratulations" to Demoncrap Doug Jones, coupled with his "urging" of Roy Moore to accept defeat, is all just a smokescreen to conceal the big sting operation? Now don't "youse guys" (New Jerseyese for the plural of you) get all excited about this possibility because Option 1 may also be the case. All we are saying is that if Moore's recount crusade should expand into something far greater -- something that exposes the whole rotten Demonrat operation nationwide -- then know that the coming storm was planned this way all along. Trump is either a tactical genius --- or a gigantic sell-out. Either way, Alabama will provide the final verdict on Trump for us soon enough.
What comes out of Alabama's brewing vote fraud controversy will tell us if Trump has joined "the club" --- or if he was playing chess all along. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today that Trump is urging the child-molesting white supremacist Roy
Moore to concede the race in Alabama. Boobus
Americanus 2: Well, at least Trump isn't peddling that racist voter fraud nonsense
again.
Sugar: Trump had better busst these communisst
criminalss ssoon or I'm done with him! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
THURSDAY / DECEMBER 14, 2017
|
Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the current publisher of The New York Times, and his son, Arthur Gregg Sulzberger, who will assume the job on Jan. 1
N Y Times: A.G. Sulzberger, 37, Is Named Next Publisher of The New York Times
|
REBUTTAL BY
What everyone who understands how "the paper of record"
operates had already expected has now been made official. Arthur G. Sulzberger, 37, will be taking over the
role of Publisher as his dad, Arthur O. Sulzberger, 66, stays
on as chairman of The New York Times Company. The naming of the younger Sulzberger, known as A. G., comes
about one year after he was made deputy publisher of The Slimes. Boy Sulzberger
- the grandson of Arthur Ochs "Punch" Sulzberger Sr., the great-grandson of Arthur Hays
Sulzberger, and the great-great-grandson of Adolph Ochs -- represents a 121-year old unbroken Jewish
line of Sulzberger-Ochs domination of what is still the Globalists' most influential journalistic weapon on the face
of the planet. The
Jewish deniers of Jewish control of Sulzberger's Slimes will often whine: "The Times is a public corporation"
-- or -- "Carlos Slim of Mexico now owns the Times." Apart from the fact that
the Slimes' roster of Red reporters reads like the guest list for a frickin' Bar Mitzvah, the Sulzberger
Crime Family owns the majority of voting shares. As for Senor Carlos Slime, he only owns 16% of the
Slimes. Nice try, Hymie, but the Sulzbergers still run this evil propaganda sheet and with the new
boss being just 37 years of age, the commie clan is poised to keep pushing political lies, cultural degradation and moral
filth well into the 21st Century.
The "prestigious" Slimes was instrumental in selling many huge historical lies before any hard data had even been gathered: 1- 1915: The Lusitania was NOT "torpedoed twice." The second explosion was caused either by the ignition of smuggled munitions or a time bomb. 2- 1939: Germany did NOT "attack Poland." It was Poland, (at the behest of UK, France & FDR) which drew first blood. 3- 1963: John F. Kennedy was NOT "killed by a sniper" (named Lee Harvey Oswald). He was shot from the front-side from the "grassy knoll." .THE HISTORY OF THE SLIMES Since its founding in 1851 by Republican Henry Jarvis Raymond, The Times has been a big player in shaping public opinion. But it was not until 1896 that the Times took a sharp turn to the internationalist Left when it was purchased by the German-Jew named Adolph Ochs. In 1897, Ochs himself would coin the paper's now famous self-serving slogan, printed on its masthead every day ever since: "All the News That’s Fit to Print.” Ochs’ daughter married Arthur Hays Sulzberger, who became publisher when Adolph died in 1935. After A.H. Sulzberger's reign (1935-1961), Orville Dryfoos headed the paper for 2 years before Arthur Ochs "Punch" Sulzberger Sr. took over (1963-1992). He spawned the demon-seed Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. -- who is still the publisher of the NY Times today, until the just-named heir to the throne, A.G. Sulzberger, take over on January 1st, 2018. Now that is some serious generational power, and probably not 1 in 250 Americans have ever even heard of this family of felonious fiends! And that generational power has always been at the service of "The Deep State" Globalists and the far left wing of the Demoncrap Party. With the exception of the Fake Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Slimes has endorsed every Demoncarp candidate for President since 1952 -- which pretty much tells us who Eisenhower was actually working for.
All the new that's fit to distort is more like it!
Just how powerful is “Sulzberger’s Slimes?” Famed writer Gore Vidal may have been a morally degenerate sodomite who was wrong about many things, but his reference to the Slimes as “the Typhoid Mary of American journalism” was as spot-on as it was witty. One need only glance at the morning headlines of “the paper of record,” and then take note of how the superficial infomercials known as “the Nightly News” will so often pick up on whatever front page fairy-tale that the Manhattan Mendacity Machine had spun that very same morning. The historical record is clear: Sulzberger's Slimes is the lead attack-fish of the Piranha Press. Like some journalistic plague, the virus of lies, half-truths and cherry-picked data then
infects the unguarded minds of the whole country, and indeed, the world. Such is the indisputable destructive
power and undeserved “prestige” of this dreadful “Orwellian” institution. King
Arthur may be stepping aside, but Prince Arthur will surely be just as vile of a creature as the others of his ancestral line.
1 & 2 - As long as these sons-of-bitches keep lying, the Editorial Board of The Anti-New York Times will keep slinging rebuttals at the Sulzberger Crime Syndicate. 3 - - The Great One (commenting on Germany's dishonest Jewish-owned press of World War I days): "... the magnitude of a lie always contains a certain factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people .... more easily fall a victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big. Such a falsehood will never enter their heads and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of these causes as true. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick – a fact which all the great lie-virtuosi and lying-clubs in this world know only too well and also make the most treacherous use of." * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today that the publisher of the Times just appointed his son to takeover
the paper. Boobus
Americanus 2: The New York Times remains the paper of record. I don't what I would do without
it.
Sugar: You might have to actually start
thinking for yoursself, dumb-asss! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
WEDNESDAY / DECEMBER 13, 2017
|
N Y Times (Op-Ed): Alabama Says No to Trump's Tribalism
|
TUESDAY / DECEMBER 12, 2017
|
Decimated cars and houses in a neighborhood in Iraq, recently recaptured from the Islamic State. Its militants built an advanced system of weapons production without recent precedent among insurgent groups.
N Y Times: How ISIS Produced Its Cruel Arsenal on an Industrial Scale
|
REBUTTAL BY
Oh how they lie. My God, how they lie! Ever since the well-armed, well-trained, well-funded, well-fed CIA-Mossad-Saudi proxy terrorist force dubbed "ISIS," aka "ISIL," aka "Daesh," aka "The Islamic State," burst onto the scene in 2013, inquiring observers with an ounce of critical thinking capacity have been asking, "Where the frickety frack did these tens of thousands of crazed killers get all these bad-ass weapons from?" Think about it. For more than four bloody and long years, these rag-tag volunteers were able to stand toe-to-toe against the regular Syrian and Iraqi militaries, and would have eventually triumphed were it not for the direct intervention of Russia, Iran and the Hezbollah heroes of Lebanon. Where exactly did their stuff come from?
  ISIS
was armed to the teeth with fully automatic machine guns, ammunition, hand grenades, land mines, shoulder- fired rockets,
trucks, jeeps, light artillery, anti-aircraft guns and more. How did they get their hands on this stuff?
The Answer: From no less of an authority than Sulzberger's Slimes -- we bring you the following truth gems that were allowed to slip through the cracks because the oh-so-sophisticated readers of the Slimes are too dad-gum bloody stupid to discern the significance of the following headlines anyway:
And finally -- and these are critical -- stories pertaining to Trump's killing of the CIA program.
And now you know where ISIS got its weapons from, and that it was Trump who stopped the flow. Of course, the apologists for this CIA/Mossad/Saudi subversion will claim: "No. We weren't supporting ISIS. Those weapons went to the "moderate rebels," -- well, Mr. Putin ably and concisely shot that lie down when he said: "One shouldn't play with words differentiating between moderate and immoderate terrorists. What is the difference?" Tell it, Vlad, tell it!
1. Assad and Putin have
both said, repeatedly, that the "moderate rebels" and ISIS and essentially the same fighting force. 2.
Prior to being fired from CBS and PBS for groping women and exposing his penis to subordinate female staffers, Bildeberger
pervert propagandist CIArlie Rose purposely referred to the war as a "civil war"
during a "gotcha" interview with Syrian President Assad. Assad corrected him by pointing out that most of the "rebels"
were foreign imports. 3. Putin also spanked
Rose's sneaky ass.
Now that ISIS has been run out of town (thanks to Trump & Putin), and the full scope of the death and destruction which the proxy terrorists inflicted upon Syria and Iraq is open for the world to see, a cover story is needed to explain away the astonishing level of firepower that the men in black pajamas brought to the battlefields of Syria and Iraq. According to the history-distorters of the Slimes, the tech-boys of ISIS were like that character from Macgyver -- the 1980's TV show about the thrilling adventures and great escapes of a resourceful secret agent who could turn anything and everything into a booby trap or an explosive device. Get a whiff of this Manhattan manure, from the
article: "Late this spring, Iraqi forces fighting the Islamic State in Mosul discovered three unfired rocket-propelled grenades with an unusual feature — a heavy liquid sloshing inside their warheads. Tests later found that the warheads contained a crude blister agent resembling sulfur mustard, a banned chemical weapon intended to burn a victim’s skin and respiratory tract. The improvised chemical rockets were the latest in a procession of weapons developed by the Islamic State during a jihadist arms-manufacturing spree without recent analogue. Irregular fighting forces, with limited access to global arms markets, routinely manufacture their own weapons. But the Islamic State took the practice to new levels, with outputs “unlike anything we’ve ever seen” from a nonstate force, said Solomon H. Black, (cough cough) a State Department official who tracks and analyzes weapons. Humanitarian de-miners, former military explosive ordnance
disposal technicians and arms analysts working in areas captured from the Islamic State provided The New York Times with
dozens of reports and scores of photographs and drawings detailing weapons that the militant organization has developed
since 2014, when it established a self-declared caliphate in Syria and Iraq. The records show the work of a jihadist hive mind — a system of armaments production that combined research and development, mass production and organized distribution to amplify the militant organization’s endurance and power.
Actual images from the Slimes article --- straight out of a Hollyweird script. Space heaters turned into time bombs. All you need is a few pliers and some household chemicals
Some weapon components, for example, were essentially standardized, including locally manufactured injection-molded munition fuzes, shoulder-fired rockets, mortar ammunition, modular bomb parts and plastic-bodied land mines that underwent generations of upgrades. Many were produced in industrial quantities. The findings also included apparent prototypes of weapons that either were not selected for mass production or were abandoned in development, including projectiles loaded with caustic soda and shoulder-fired rockets containing blister agent. While the Islamic State has been routed from almost all its territory in Iraq and Syria, security officials say that ... as its members move on to other countries, its foreign members return home and veterans of its arms-production network pool and share knowledge and techniques online." * So that's how they almost overthrew the Syrian government, eh Sulzberger? Who needs CIA weapons shipments
when you have "caustic soda" and the Internet? (rolling eyes) Oh how they lie. My God, how they lie! And their very own previous headlines and articles prove it.
IMIS: Islamic MacGyver in Iraq and Syria * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an interesting article in the New York Times today describing how clever and resourceful the
ISIS fighters were in developing their own weapons. Boobus Americanus 2: Interesting. I always wondered where their weapons came from.
Sugar: And just like that, the obedient
ssimpletons accept the Sslimess' ridiculouss explanation. What frickin' loserss! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
MONDAY / DECEMBER 11, 2017
|
N Y Times: Trump, Rejecting Calls to Stay Away, Speaks at Civil Rights Museum
|
REBUTTAL BY
Unlike we independent bloggers, politicians don't always have the luxury of sticking to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth -- nor of sticking to the principle, the whole principle, and nothing but the principle. Even The Great One (that's Hitler for you newbies and normies) felt compelled to pacify International Jewry (and thus end the boycotts against Germany) by facilitating the migration of 60,000 Jews from Germany to Palestine. In 1939, he even sent the Bolshevik butcher Stalin a "Happy Birthday" telegram! In more recent times, we have witnessed Putin the almost-great show up at Russian synagogues to light menorahs.
The dirty requirements of the political game 1. The Great One, eager to keep peace between Germany and the USSR, sent Stalin a warm personal greeting for his 60th Birthday in 1939. 2. A coin issued by a German newspaper commemorates the German-Jewish cooperation which peacefully transferred 60,000 Jews from Germany to Palestine. 3. Putin lights a Hanukkah menorah.
In consideration of this unfortunate reality of what the erudite
eggheads of academia refer to as "realpolitik,"
The OFFICIAL historical description of: "The Civil Rights Movement" ™ : Through nonviolent protest, the civil rights movement
of the 1950s and '60s broke the system of discrimination and segregation by “race” in the South. Two major breakthroughs
in equal-rights legislation for African Americans were ultimately achieved as a result: 1) The
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (which guarantees fairness in hiring and promoting) and 2) The Voting Rights
Act of 1965 (which prevents racist southern states from stopping Blacks from voting.)
The ACTUAL historical description of: "The Civil Rights Movement" ™ : An anti-White movement -- organized, financed and directed by Marxist Jews -- which utilized violent Black agents (Black Panthers, Black Communists etc) for the purpose of making "non-violent" ™ Black agents (Marxist Loser King, NAACP etc) appear reasonable. The subversive movement -- which cleverly capitalized upon some legitimate grievances -- culminated with the passage of 1) The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (a law which, due to potential lawsuits associated with hiring, firing and promoting, essentially mandates widespread discrimination against Whites) and 2) The Voting Rights Act of 1965 (a law that guarantees every easily-manipulated illiterate and semi-retard the "right" to vote for Communist Democrats -- in many cases, multiple times.)
1- Marxist Loser King was surrounded by Communist Jews. In Image #1, he accepts an award from Rabbi Jacob Rothschild (hmmm). The Red Rabbi Rothschild also delivered the eulogy at King's funeral. (here) 2- 1964: LBJ signs the Civil Rights atrocity with MLK at his side 3- 1965: LBJ signs the Voting Rights atrocity, again, with MLK at his side
Ironically, Black folks themselves were just as victimized by the rampant Marxism of the 1960's. Sadly, most of the "bruthas" and "sistas" are, by now, too libtarded to even realize how dirty their Marxist "benefactors" did them as well. You see, boys and girls, the same gang that stuck it to Whitey with the horrible Civil and Voting Rights Acts also implemented a financial incentive system (aka "War on Poverty" or "The Great Society") to encourage young Black (and later Hispanic) girls to get pregnant out-of-wedlock. Facilitating this catastrophic familial / societal breakdown was the 1960's "sexual revolution," glorified by Hollyweird (cough cough) and the "music" industry (cough cough). A baby sired by an absentee stud gets the "baby momma" free housing, food stamps, Medicaid, free heat & electricity and some spending cash to boot! When many of these scores of millions of fatherless Blacks and Browns grow up without the necessary parental guidance, life skills, financial backing, education, emotional stability and discipline needed to create a decent life for themselves; their Marxist oppressors are there to whisper in their ear: "It's the White Man's fault!" And many of them will believe it too as the profitable cycle of bunny-like promiscuity continues from one generation to the next. And now you know, dear reader, what this taxpayer-funded
obscenity in Mississippi truly represents.
1. The Mississippi Civil Rights Museum was funded by $40 million dollars of mostly White taxpayer money / debt (sale of bonds). 2. Portraits of the "freedom riders" (outside agitators from the North) adorn the walls of this House of Horrors. The "White" faces are mostly those of Marxist Jews. 3. Always angry, always full of hate for Whitey, and never satisfied. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today that some Black leaders boycotted the opening of the Civil Rights Museum in Mississippi because Trump was there. Boobus Americanus 2: That's unfortunate, yet quite understandable in light of Trump's racist rhetoric.
Sugar: White Power!!! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
SATURDAY / DECEMBER 9, 2017
|
N Y Times: Congressional
|
REBUTTAL BY
For many years, even some of the most thoroughly Jewish-owned U.S. Presidents ignored the low-level whining of the usual suspects for special White House recognition of their Hanukkah holiday. After all, why should this tiny minority (2-3%) have been singled out for attention at a time when most of the other 98% of America was celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ (who was tortured and murdered due to pressure from the Jewish Lobby of Roman times). Do the Israelis ever give us "goyim" a "Merry Christmas" shout-out? "Kill Jesus! Crucify him!" /// Pontius Pilate: "But what has this man done wrong?" Christmas nativity scenes and Hanukkah menorahs are simply not compatible. The biggest Hanukkah snub of the usual suspects came from President John F. Kennedy in 1962, when he mentioned every religious denomination but the Jews during a Christmas address: "Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, as well as Christians, pause from their labors the 25th day of December to celebrate the birthday of the Prince of Peace. There could be no more striking proof that Christmas is truly the universal holiday of all men." Indeed, the oh-so-evil Muslims (rolling eyes sarcastically) revere Jesus as a Holy Prophet; and Buddhists and Hindus not only respect his moral teachings, but you'll never hear one of them them take offense to the term "Merry Christmas" -- let alone demand that the White House honor the Buddha or Krishna. No. Only certain chosenites recoil in horror at the term -- which is why so many Boobuses now walk around wishing their own Christian friends and family a "Happy Holiday!" (barf!) EVERYONE, even Muslims, Buddhists and non-religious people used to say "Merry Christmas" at this time of year. Until the marketing men (cough cough) changed the terminology to the more "inclusive" ™ "Happy Holidays. *
Composer Irving Berlin (cough cough)
got the Christian boobs to saying "Happy Holiday" with his famous song by that name. He also composed
"White Christmas" -- turning the once HOLY-day into a festival about snow and shopping. -- The popular de-Jesused
and secularized Christmas songs: Silver Bells, Sleigh Ride, Rudolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer, Rockin' Around the Christmas
Tree, Let it Snow, Winter Wonderland, Santa Baby, I'll be Home for Christmas, The Christmas Song (aka 'Chestnuts Roasting
on an Open Fire') were ALL composed by Jews. (here) -- How very nice of them to supply us all with these songs (rolling eyes) * It was George W Bush who started this tradition of "The White House Hanukkah Party" in 2001 -- just a few months after the usual suspects and their henchmen blew up the Twin Towers in New York. For the past 16 years, the guest list at this kosher party has included hundreds of American Jewish politicians, organization heads, and school / yeshiva deans. The Hanukkah Hatefest runs parallel to another tradition started by the Bush / Cheney gang -- the proclamation message and participation by the President or a high-level staff member in the lighting of the obscenely huge eyesore known as "The National Menorah" (barf!) on the White House South Lawn near the National Mall. Every President since Bush 43 has been officially honoring Hanukkah with a big White House party and menorah ceremony. Cheese and Crackers! Can they make that mega-menorah on the South Lawn any bigger? We refer to Hanukkah as a hatefest because, at its core, whether most partially assimilated "modern Jews" realize it or not, the holiday commemorates not only the stubborn refusal of the ancient Jewish sect known as the "Zealots" to assimilate to Greek (Aryan) society; but also the brutal treatment meted out to those "traitor" Jews who were assimilating to Greek culture. Assimilation / race-mixing is a big no-no for the hard core chosenites -- except, of course, when they promote it for their White goyim rivals which they seek to blend out of existence. In fact, one of the reasons they hated Christ's teachings so much was because his path to godliness was truly inclusive to everybody -- not just "the chosen people." So you see, dear reader, that hideous skyscraper of a menorah planted at the White House South Lawn every December is essentially a group of nine middle-fingers proclaiming the message to America: "We are Jews and we own this joint!" And indeed they do.
1 & 2. The "chosen" Zealots didn't believe in "diversity" or assimilation. Hanukkah is a war holiday -- the eternal enemy being the Aryan White Man. 3. If a giant cross were ever erected at the White House, the legal piranhas of the American Civil Liberties Union (cough cough) would be filing lawsuits and demanding the impeachment of the President for violating the principle of "separation of church and state." ™ *
The Mossad's Menorah Logo and Motto: "By way of deception, thou shalt do war." * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today about the annual Hanukkah Party at the White House. It was actually
George W Bush who started the tradition in 2001. Boobus
Americanus
2: In our muti-cultural
society, it is very important not to exclude anyone from the Holiday Season.
 Sugar:
Boobuss, you $@*^%$!!! It ain't the frickin' "holiday sseason!" --- It'ss
Chrisstmass!!! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
DECEMBER 8, 1941
|
N Y Times: Flashback - December 8, 1941 - Post-Pearl Harbor Issue
|
REBUTTAL BY
* Boobus
Americanus
1: The nerve of them Japs attacking us at Pearl Harbor. Boobus
Americanus
2: A date that will
live in infamy.
Sugar:
That'ss right Boobuss --- the United Statess and Britain are alwayss the good guyss, right? You frickin' dope! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THURSDAY / DECEMBER 7, 2017
|
King Michael acknowledging applause after speaking in Romania’s Parliament in 2011. Beside him was his eldest daughter, Princess Margareta, and her husband, Prince Radu Duda, left.
N Y Times: King Michael of Romania, Who Ousted a Hitler Puppet, Dies at 96
|
REBUTTAL BY
King Michael of Romania is dead, eh?
We didn't even realize that this bumbling loser was still alive all this time, until we glanced this headline. Good riddance
to him too! The opening lines explain why Sulzberger's Slimes would grant him such a puff-piece for a eulogy:
"King Michael of Romania, who was credited with pre-emptively saving thousands of lives in World War II when, at 22, he had the audacity to arrest the country’s dictator, a puppet of Hitler, died on Tuesday at his residence in Switzerland. He was 96." His shining achievement came on Aug. 23, 1944, when Michael,
whose powers were perceived as largely ceremonial, bravely summoned Hitler’s crony Ion Antonescu, the fascist dictator
of Romania, to his palace and arrested him.    1. The young King
Michael (circa 1944) 2. Ion Antonescu, shaking hands with Hitler, was arrested
on the King's orders. 3.1946: The brave and noble Antonescu is executed by a firing squad. A communist officer
makes sure that he is dead by shooting him once more in the head.
For
the record, Ion Antonescu was neither a "puppet"
nor a "crony" of The Great One (that's Hitler for you newbies and normies). Of the various
states that fought alongside Germany in the East (Finland, Italy, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Croatia) not
one fought against their own will or under German influence. No, they fought because they all realized the imminent
danger which Stalin and the Jewish Bolsheviks posed to all of Europe. And in Romania's case, the Soviets had already initiated
hostilities by invading parts of eastern Romania in June, 1940. By the time King Michael removed Antonescu, the tide of the war had already turned against Germany. One could therefore make the reasonable argument that Michael was only trying to spare his people further hardship. But he went much further than he needed to. In addition to breaking Romania's pact with Germany, he and his cohorts actually declared war against an already nearly-defeated Germany! To assist in that war effort, an agreement was signed, in Moscow, containing the following stipulations: Article 3: "The Government and High Command of Rumania will ensure to the Soviet and other Allied forces facilities
for free movement on Rumanian territory in any direction if required by the military situation, the Rumanian Government
and High Command of Rumania giving such movement every possible assistance with their own means of communications and at
their own expense on land, on water and in the air." Article 18: "An
Allied Control Commission will be established which will undertake until the conclusion
of peace the regulation of and control over the execution of the present terms under the general direction and orders of
the Allied (Soviet) High Command, acting on behalf of the Allied Powers. Annex to Article 18: "The Rumanian Government and their organs shall fulfill
all instructions of the Allied Control Commission arising out of the Armistice Agreement." After the conclusion of this Armistice Agreement in 1944, Stalin
occupied the entire territory of Romania with 1 million troops. When the war in Europe had ended (May, 1945), the
Red Army stayed there until Romania finally slipped into communist
totalitarianism in 1947 (surprise surprise). Michael protested and argued for the preservation of a constitutional monarchy. But when Stalin's boys forced him to
abdicate at gunpoint, Michael finally realized who he had been partnering with. An interesting
excerpt from the article details how the tragic folly of King Michael's easy capitulation to the Soviet played out in the
end: "Stalin ordered Romania to get rid of its king. Romania’s prime minister, Petru Groza, was persuasive: He threatened to execute 1,000 of Michael’s supporters, and Michael himself, if he did not abdicate. “It was blackmail,” Michael told The New York Times in 2007. “They said, ‘If you don’t sign this immediately we are obliged’ — why obliged I don’t know — to kill more than 1,000 students that they had in prison.” What did you
expect from these bloody Bolsheviks, eh Mikey? Did you think that they would actually allow a Christian Monarchy to rule Romania?
You big dope!
Three years after allowing 1,000,000 Soviet troops to just walk into his country, the idiot King was forced to sign an abdication letter and flee communist Romania for his life. -- Stalin must surely have been greatly amused. King Michael eventually settled in Switzerland as Romania was left to suffer under four decades under communism,
before being integrated into the modern day communist European Union -- all because some 22-year old ass clown
had opened up his country's borders and literally welcomed in 1,000,000 of Stalin's "temporary" invaders.
Had Michael allied with the United States and Britain but resisted Stalin's demand for a "peaceful" occupation,
Romania (like Greece) might have been able to hold out against its internal communists and then receive western protection
when the first phase of the "Cold War" started in 1946. Would it not have been worth resisting when as
many as two million Romanians ended up being murdered or persecuted by the communists of Romania? (here) And yet the Slimes credits this royal rascal with "saving lives!" Of course,
in the end, all of Europe would fall to "kinder gentler" EU communism anyway. The saddest part of this
tragic farce is that upon King Michael 's post-communist era visits to Romania, he drew huge crowds and died a popular figure.
Evidently, most Romanians do not know the story of how this idiot rolled out a red carpet for those 1,000,000 Soviets who
just strolled right in, and overstayed their welcome. It is Ion Antonescu who ought to be remembered and honored by Romanians,
not this short-sighted fool.    The idiot who rolled out the red carpet for
1,000,000 of Stalin's troops remained highly regarded by Boobus Romania until the end.
* Boobus
Americanus
1: I read a story in the New York Times today about the passing of Romania's King Michael. During World
War II, the young King had the foresight
to break Romania's alliance with Germany and side with the Allies in 1944. Boobus
Americanus 2: Interesting. I never knew Romania was once allied with Hitler.
Sugar:
Boobuss, my idiot friend -- Germany had many alliess, as well as 500,000 Waffen SS volunteerss from the variouss countriess
of Europe. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
TUESDAY / DECEMBER 5, 2017
|
N Y Times: John Anderson, Who Ran Against Reagan and Carter in 1980, Is Dead at 95
|
REBUTTAL BY
As far as historical figures of the 20th Century are concerned, John B. Anderson, a former Republican Congressman from Illinois and independent candidate for President, was but a minor footnote. But because his "15 minutes of fame" ™ on the world stage"™ represented the typical behind-the-scenes machinations of the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) which we so often write about here, the good news of his death offers us a chance to review an interesting bit of history from almost four decades ago -- (My goodness, how time flies!) Sugar, fire up the Time Machine to 1980. Into the mist of history we go.
1. John Anderson (on right) did poorly in the GOP primaries. 2. Anderson campaigning for the Republican nomination in Los Angeles. 3. Campaign button
The presidential first term of David Rockefeller
and Zbigniew Brzezinski's Globalist Golden Boy Jimmy Carter had been marked by economic
stagnation, high inflation, liberal activism, and the taking / holding of 52 American diplomats and citizens (mainly CIA
spies) as hostages in Iran. The negative political climate in 1980 was finally ripe for a populist-conservative-nationalist
"outsider" like former California Governor Ronald Reagan to win the presidency. In addition to
the excited conservative voters and the southerners who by now felt betrayed by Georgia boy Carter, the Zionist "Neo-Cons,"
angry over Globalist Carter's attempts to rein-in Nationalist Israel, were lining up their money and influence behind "the
Reagan Revolution" as well. To stop Reagan -- who had blown away Establishment hacks like George Bush (the Edler) and Bob Dole in the GOP primaries -- the Globalists tried to pull off a repeat of 1912 -- the year in which President Howard Taft was defeated as the result of Teddy Roosevelt splitting of the GOP vote with a third party run, thus electing Woodrow Wilson with only 42% of the vote. To pull off the scam, liberal Republican't and Council on Foreign Relations member John Anderson (one of the candidates that Reagan had already defeated in the primaries) was puffed up by Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press. Anderson's "independent" status appealed to Republican libtards and "moderates."
1.
Rockefeller agent Zbigniew Brzezinski, as Jimmy Carter's handler, brought death and Globalist conquest to
several nations around the world. 2. 1981: During Carter's final days year in office, he decorated the evil
Brzezinski with the Medal of Freedom! 3. After "Ronnie's Romp"
through the GOP primaries in 1980, the unpopular Carter seemed destined to be a one-termer. Enter, John Anderson
The Slimes article reminds us of what a RINO (Republican In Name Only)
this CFR ass clown really was: "Anderson called for a gasoline tax of 50 cents per gallon — when a gallon cost
$1.15 — to save energy. Early on, when all six of his rivals for the Republican nomination assured the Gun Owners of New Hampshire that they firmly opposed gun control legislation, Mr. Anderson said, “I don’t understand why.” “When in this country we license people to drive automobiles,” he added, “what is so wrong about proposing that we license guns to make sure that felons and mental incompetents don’t get hold of them?” He was roundly booed." Anderson had never finished better than second in
a Republican primary. He even lost his home state of Illinois to Reagan by 12 points. It was in April, 1980, that he then
decided to run as an independent spoiler, drawing most of his support from liberal "Rockefeller Republicans" and
college libtards looking for a fresh faced "maverick." Reagan's people were incensed! Anderson missed the petition deadline to run as an independent in five states. His people circulated petitions in those states anyway. Throughout the summer of 1980, his campaign won his lawsuits against the deadlines in those five states. He also faced the problem that he hadn’t found a vice-presidential running mate yet. So he recruited a stand-in in order to meet the requirement -- Milton Eisenhower, the Marxist-Globalist older brother of deceased President and war criminal Dwight Eisenhower. That alone tells us all we need to know about Mr. Anderson!
ANDERSON'S GLOBALIST BACKERS 1. Super Globalist Henry Kissinger made
the highly unusual move of endorsing an incumbent Congressman in 1978. 2. As President, at varying times,
of three different American universities, Milton Eisenhower enthusiastically promoted communist UNESCO initiatives
at his campuses. 3. The Council on Foreign Relations (New York) -- Anderson was a member
at the time.
Anderson/Eisenhower had peaked in early August with 25% of voters saying they preferred Anderson to either Carter or Reagan, with the majority of the supporters coming from the liberal wing of the GOP. He finally named an actual running mate in late August, 1980 -- former Wisconsin Governor Patrick Lucey. But Anderson’s support eventually waned because voters returned to the main candidates who they believed could actually win. So, in spite of the Anderson scam, Reagan and George HW Bush (the former CIA Director who was forced upon the ticket as VP) won in a landslide as Anderson ended up with just 6.6 percent of the popular vote. Though America was spared a second term of Carter and his evil National Security Adviser,
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Reagan, who had openly campaigned against Globalism and Rockefeller's Tri-Lateral Commission,
quickly "moderated" once in office. A ricocheted bullet to the lung, fired by a would-be assassin with ties to the
Bush Crime Family (here), just 6 weeks into his presidency, may have something to do with keeping Reagan under control. In closing,
as we said upon hearing of the death of the aforementioned David Rockefeller this past March, and also for
the aforementioned Zbigniew Brzezinski this past May --- rot in hell, John Anderson. Rot in hell.
After the Anderson third-party play failed to stop Reagan, a bullet from a "nut" connected to the Bush Family taught Reagan to behave. Those his presidency was an improvement over that of Carter's, the "Deep State" retained control. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in the New York Times today that John Anderson died. Remember him? Boobus
Americanus 2: Yes. That was my first election. He was a true independent maverick.
Sugar:
Boobusss!!!! "Independent maverickss" don't get invited
to join the CFR and they don't ssuck up to Globalisst sscum like Kisssinger and Eissenhower, you frickin' moron! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
MONDAY / DECEMBER 4, 2017
|
N Y Times: Did James Comey Subtweet Michael Flynn?
Not long after the president’s former national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, pleaded guilty on Friday to lying to the F.B.I., the man who was leading the agency when the lie was told, James B. Comey, had something to tweet.
|
REBUTTAL BY
Sensing that Trump may be in trouble, the Piranha Press is in a feeding frenzy over Special Counsel Robert Mueller's recent charging of former National Security Adviser and Army General Mike Flynn for "lying to the FBI" about having reached out to the Russian ambassador during the pre-inauguration transition period (oh horrors!). The Director of the FBI at that time was James Comey -- a close personal friend of the man that he succeeded at the FBI in 2013 -- the vary same Robert Mueller. Just three weeks into his term as President, Trump fired Flynn for "lying to Vice President Mike Pence" about talking to the Russians. Two months later, Trump also fired Comey for poking around into this nonsense about "Russian collusion." The Flynn "lie" and the Comey firing are what fueled Trump's enemies to call for a Special Counsel and for Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the investigation. Now, with a big fish such as Flynn seemingly set to take down even bigger fish, the ex-FBI Director who was fired and personally attacked by Trump (via twitter), is cryptically gloating and taunting in cyberspace. From Comey's recent Instagram: “To paraphrase the Buddha — Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun; the moon; and the truth.” From Comey's recent twitter: But justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream” Amos 5:24
   1. Flynn is in big trouble -- or is it all just theater to mask something else? 2. Trump and Comey hate each other -- or is it all just theater too? 3. Justice and righteousness are about to "roll down like water," tweeted preacher Comey. --- Hmmmm.
So, the noose must be tightening
around Trump's neck, right? Why else would Comey, Trump's mortal enemy, be foretelling of a coming "truth" and "justice?"
Be not alarmed over the charging of General Flynn and the anti-Trump coup of Comey and Mueller. Whereas A brief
summary of the backgrounds of the two ex-FBI Directors who are "out to get Trump."
James Comey James Comey is a lifelong Republican. That doesn't necessarily make him a "good guy," of course, but when we learn about how he and then-FBI Director Robert Mueller both threatened to resign from the Bush administration over the Bush/Cheney policy of warrantless searches, it's an indication that he is his own man. Found this little gem online: "On early January 2006, The New York Times reported that Comey, who was Acting Attorney General during the March 2004 hospitalization of John Ashcroft, refused to certify the legality of central aspects of the NSA program. The certification was required under White House procedures in order for the program to continue. In March 2004, FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III and Comey threatened the Bush administration with their resignations if the White House overruled the DOJ finding that the domestic wiretapping under the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) was unconstitutional, if such were done without a court warrant." Kudos for standing up to the evil Bush/Cheney gang, Mr. Comey! But the 6' 8" Sunday School teacher wasn't just a bane for the Bush Crime Family. As a US Attorney in 2001, Comey was described as "enthusiastic" about investigating ex-President Bill Clinton and ex-First Lady / co-President Killary Clinton. A recent story in liberal Politico confirms this. Headline: Comey "enthusiastic" about Bill Clinton probe in 2001, FBI memo says FBI Director James Comey—blamed by many Democrats for costing Hillary Clinton the presidential election last year—was excited about pursuing a criminal investigation into President Bill Clinton's most controversial pardons more than a decade ago, newly released FBI files show.... A July 2002 memo to then-FBI Director Robert Mueller says investigators were exploring “potential federal violations of bribery, obstruction of justice, money laundering, conspiracy and campaign finance law offenses.” “I was stunned when President Clinton pardoned them,” Comey said in a 2008 letter to Congress. .... The probe was finally closed down in 2005 by interim U.S. Attorney David Kelley, four years after it began." You see, Comey and friends were hot on the Clinton's trail until the "powers that be" (Bush / Cheney?) finally shut the investigation down in 2005!
1. Marc Rich (cough cough) and his wife were generous donors to the Clintons. Rich, dubbed "the fugitive financier" essentially bought himself a pardon --- granted by Clinton just as he left office in 2001. 2. A young James Comey was "enthusiastic" about unraveling the Clinton web of financial crime. 3. David Kelley shut down the probe into the Clintons -- on George Bush's orders?
Although many Republicans, not seeing the big picture, blame Comey for "letting Hillary off the hook" in 2016, the reality is that Comey's last minute mini-investigation and "exoneration" of Hillary actually sank her campaign and handed Trump the election. Liberal political analyst Nate Silver called it correctly: Headline: The Comey Letter Probably Cost Clinton The ElectionSo why won’t the media admit as much?Hillary Clinton would probably be president if FBI Director James Comey had not sent a letter to Congress on Oct. 28. The letter, which said the FBI had “learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation” into the private email server that Clinton used as secretary of state, upended the news cycle and soon halved Clinton’s lead in the polls, imperiling her position in the Electoral College. The impact of Comey’s letter is comparatively easy to quantify, by contrast. At a maximum, it might have shifted
the race by 3 or 4 percentage points toward Donald Trump, swinging Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida to him,
perhaps along with North Carolina and Arizona. At a minimum, its impact might have been only a percentage point or so. Still,
because Clinton lost Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by less than 1 point, the letter was probably enough to change
the outcome of the Electoral College. And yet, from almost the moment that Trump won the White House, many mainstream journalists have been in denial about the impact of Comey’s letter." ... One can believe that the Comey letter cost Clinton the election without thinking that the media cost her the election — it was an urgent story that any newsroom had to cover. But if the Comey letter had a decisive effect and the story was mishandled by the press — given a disproportionate amount of attention relative to its substantive importance, — the media needs to grapple with how it approached the story. More sober coverage of the story might have yielded a milder voter reaction."
Silver is absolutely correct! Comey's timing -- just one week prior to the election -- FORCED the media to cover the allegations which hurt Killary so badly at the last moment, even though Comey did "exonerate" her. Have a look at what Sulzberger's Slimes had to run on its front page as a result of Comey's decision to poke around Killary's E-mails, brought to us courtesy of NSA (military) hackers, filtered through free-agent Julian Assange:
"NEW E-MAILS JOLT CLINTON CAMPAIGN IN RACE'S LAST DAYS" Though he did not "make a case," --- the damage was done by his nationally televised address. THANK YOU for saving us from this evil bitch, Mr. Comey!
Robert Mueller Like Comey, Mueller is also a lifelong Republican with an animosity towards the Bush Crime Family. Like Trump' Chief of Staff John Kelly, Offense Secretary James Mattis, CIA Chief Mike Pompeo, and the aforementioned Mike Flynn, Mueller is also a military man -- an ex-marine wounded in Vietnam and highly decorated. The really big fish that he has already appeared to bag is not Flynn, but the pedo-faggot Demonrat lobbyist, Tony Podesta and possibly his little brother and Killary insider, John Podesta. (here) All good signs!
Headline: The Washington Post Brother in Arms, The Long Friendship between Mueller and Comey (here)
Marine Mueller and his good friend, the giant Comey. As Republicans, both fought very hard against Bush / Cheney, and later investigated the Clintons too. One more point about Mueller -- as FBI Chief during 9/11, he did go off script --- for a while --- by confirming that stolen identifies were used to impersonate hijackers. Headline, CNN, September 21, 2001:
Another good sign? Maybe --- let's see where this goes. Stay tuned!
Headline: Washington Post: (October 2016): Trump: If elected, I’ll appoint a special prosecutor to look into Clinton’s emails "Donald Trump said during Sunday's presidential debate that, if elected, he would appoint a special prosecutor to look into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while she was secretary of state. "I didn’t think I’d say this and I’m going to say it and I hate to say it. … If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation because there has never been so many lies, so much deception," Trump said." *
Could we be witnessing a massive and brilliantly devised reverse-psychology "sting operation?" * Having read all this, let's review Comey's cryptic posts in that light, and see what "youse guys" think:
This just in --- The game of strategic deception is intensifying ---
Yahoo Headline: Trump fumes about Comey, Clinton and the FBI after Flynn guilty plea On Saturday night, Trump attempted to pivot from Flynn to his former Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. (Trump tweeted)
“So General Flynn lies to
the FBI and his life is destroyed, while Crooked Hillary Clinton, on that now famous FBI holiday ‘interrogation’
with no swearing in and no recording, lies many times … and nothing happens to her?” Trump tweeted. “Rigged
system, or just a double standard?”
* Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an article in the New York Times today about how James Comey appears to be mocking Mike Flynn and hinting that the truth will soon be known. Boobus
Americanus 2: It does appear now that Comey will have the last laugh on Trump.
 Sugar:
Don't be sso ssure Boobuss! I'm ssenssing that Trump is the one holding the cardss here. COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
|
FRIDAY / DECEMBER 1, 2017
|
Elena Mason, center, spoke with canvassers for Doug Jones’s campaign in West Anniston, Ala., this month.
N Y Times: Black Voters Could Sway an Alabama Senate Race Rocked by Scandal
|
From the days of the post-Civil War "carpetbaggers" (cough cough) -- to the establishment of the Jewish-led NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) in 1909 -- to the 1950's-60's agitation known as the "civil rights movement" ™ -- outside troublemakers have incited and organized gullible local Blacks and internal Dixie libtards (yes, they do exist) to change the stubbornly conservative and patriotic Christian South into a social, cultural and moral cesspool that would better fit with the Jewish Northeast and Jewish Hollywood. This socially subversive dynamic is clearly evident in the obsession with blocking the election of conservative Alabama Judge, Roy Moore, to the US Senate.
1. 1860's American
political cartoon depicting an opportunistic Jewish carpetbagger invading the vulnerable post-war South 2.
Financier Jacob Schiff (cough cough) was one of the early financial backers of the NAACP -- a Marxist front group that worked
to convert conservative southern Blacks to the cause of Marxism. 3. From left: Ralph Abernathy,
Marxist Loser King Jr., Ralph Bunche, and Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel (cough
cough) march in Selma, Alabama. *
Northern Jews came down to Dixie by
the bus-loads to march and agitate alongside their oh-so-beloved Blacks --- using them only as battering rams to attack
White America. Notice the signs written in Hebrew and English. * Now, once again, on the basis of 40-year old unsubstantiated allegations, Blacks, particularly females, are being aggressively courted to turn out for the upcoming special election and vote against the falsely accused "harasser," Roy Moore. Let's have a look at "the usual suspects" at the core of this latest trouble-making operation targeting Alabama. Gloria Allred Nasty, bitchy, feminist, abortion-loving attorney Gloria Allred (Gloria Rachel Bloom) was born into a Jewish family in Philadelphia in 1941. She has made quite a lucrative career as a high profile, media-savvy attorney specializing in civil rights lawsuits involving sexual harassment and women's rights. Just her presence alone in Alabama was sure enough to cause a media storm. In representing Beverly Young Nelson -- one of the women who leveled dubious accusations against Moore -- Allred presented her client's High School Yearbook as evidence of the then-32 year old Moore's pursuit of teen-aged girls. It has since been established that the signature was forged, or at least grossly embellished. Allred refuses to turn over the Yearbook for closer inspection. As a result, the uproar against Moore has subsided and he appears to be headed towards victory in the coming election.
After analysis of the photo of the accusers yearbook from the 1970's clearly suggested forgery, Gloria Bloom Allred (cough cough) refused to give up the book for closer physical analysis. . The Birmingham News / The Huntsville Times / AL.com Even many seasoned "conspiracy theorists" ™ don't realize that the Jewish domination over America's newsmedia is not limited to the big national outlets or to the various local media of the Northeast and California. In addition to the national TV Fake News, the state and local media of Alabama have been the main tormentors of Judge Moore. That's because a single elite Jewish family -- the Newhouses of New York -- owns the local newspaper of Alabama's largest city (Birmingham) and 3rd largest city (Huntsville). The Newhouses (Advance Publications) also own AL.com -- Alabama's main state news website that has been converted to nothing but 24/7 anti-Moore hit-pieces. .
Meet the "White guys" of the "Alabama" Media New York Patriarch Samuel Newhouse with his sons, S.I. Newhouse Jr., left (recently deceased), and Donald.
And so, you see, dear reader, the circus in Alabama is once again the handiwork of the usual outside Jewish agitators stirring up trouble in Dixie. And they won't ever stop until Alabama gives up its God, its guns, its patriotism and becomes a "blue state," like Virginia now is. Hold firm Alabama. And elect Roy Moore!
   Leftist activist Tim
Wise (cough cough) advocates the destruction of White Alabama in the event of a Moore victory. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an article in the New York Times today about how the Democrats are hoping enough Blacks turn
out in Alabama to stop Roy Moore. Boobus
Americanus 2: It's amazing how after all these years, the South still retains
racist attitudes.
Sugar:
White Power!!! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
IT'S HERE!
  ANYT PAPERBACK / QUARTER
3 / 2017 -- Collect all 11
volumes at Amazon Page of "M S King!" (Here)
|