|
|
|
.
Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times ___________________________________________________________________ MARCH, 2016 1 FED RESERVE NOTE ___________________________________________________________________
"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!" *****************************************
|
|
REBUTTAL
BY
 
For the past decade or so, the Globalist Rockefeller Crime Family has been trying, to no avail,
to "persuade" Exxon Mobil (a spin off of the Great Grandpa Rockefeller's legendary Standard Oil company),
to understand the "dangers" of Global Warming TM. In February, 2016, Neva
Rockefeller Goodwin, daughter of former Council on Foreign Relations Director David Rockefeller,
in condemning Exxon-Mobil's "denialist campaign", wrote in an Los Angeles Slimes Op-Ed: "My great-grandfather, John D. Rockefeller Sr., created the Standard Oil Company and I inherited shares in the companies it spun off, including Exxon Mobil. But this year I donated those shares to the nonprofit Rockefeller Family Fund's Environmental program, which sold them and is using the $400,000 proceeds to fight global warming. I lost faith in Exxon Mobil's future value. A prime reason is that Exxon's valuation is based largely on the immense untapped reserves of oil and gas it owns. And yet if future generations are to inherit a livable world, most of those reserves must stay in the ground." (here)
One of the premier New World Order families of oil and banking: 1- John D. Rockefeller begot John Jr. 2- John Jr. begot David and his four brothers. 3- David (now 101!) begot Neva and five other children.
Incredibly, Goodwin-Rockefeller, a Co-Director of the Global Development And Environment Institute at Tufts University, goes on to suggest that corporate "deniers" can be held liable for damages. The blue-blooded bitch bellows: "After it was revealed that tobacco companies knew smoking caused cancer even as they funded hack scientists to deny it, they had to pay billions in fines and damages." Just last week came word that the Rockefellers are totally divesting themselves of all holdings associated with Exxon Mobil. But that was just the prelude for the coming war not just on Exxon-Mobil, but upon free speech and free thought. This is some really scary stuff folks. From this New York Slimes article: "More government officials are asking what Exxon Mobil knew about . Attorneys general from Massachusetts and the Virgin Islands announced Tuesday that they would join , New York’s attorney general, in his investigation into whether Exxon Mobil lied in decades past to investors and the public about the threat of climate change. The additional participation was announced during a news conference at Mr. Schneiderman’s offices in Lower Manhattan announcing support from 15 states, the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands for the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan. Attorneys general from Vermont, Maryland, Massachusetts, Virginia, Connecticut and the Virgin Islands, as well as former Vice President , attended the event." Yikes! No wonder the Rockefellers are divesting! How long before "climate deniers" in academia and conservative media begin losing their own jobs, or start being dragged into court for harming the public interest? Ironic, given the fact that it is the Warmist hoaxsters who should be put in jail for conspiracy, embezzlement and treason!
Stalin would be proud! On the basis of a HOAX, corporate "deniers" and real scientists could soon face legal problems. Will bloggers be far behind? . Regarding these 17 Attorney Generals -- all of them are Demoncrats, mainly from states that known to be "blue" -- their numbers will only increase as the never-ending hordes of new Turd World voters continue to be strategically imported into the "red" and "purple" states. It is only a matter of time before this type of straight-up Communist tyranny goes national / federal. The only hope for nipping this extremely dangerous assault on American sovereignty, private enterprise, free speech and free thought will be the U.S. Supreme Court with its generally 5-4 conservative / "moderate" majority that has overturned so many other crazy laws over the past decade. ---- Oh, wait, that's right, we forgot. Justice Antonin Scalia recently died of "natural causes" -- in an isolated desert refuge -- alone -- without security -- under the total control of Democrat operatives -- with no autopsy. Therefore, any 4-4 votes will not be able to block the Marxist mischief of these State Attorney Generals. --- Preach it, Church Lady.
The consequences of Scalia's conveeenient death have already been felt with the recent 4-4 deadlock that failed to overturn a decision in favor of corrupt and politicized government unions. The worst is yet to come with the kosher court.
*  Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read a story in the New York Times
today about 17 State Attorney Generals going after Exxon-Mobil for rigging Global Warming studies. Boobus
Americanus 2:
This reminds me of how tobacco companies used to mislead consumers about the dangers of smoking.  "Not exactly, Boobuss. You ssee, whereass Climate Change is communist bull-@$#&,
the dangerss
of ssmoking have been scientifically proven!" (Boobuses really suck at analogies.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
WEDNESDAY / MARCH 30, 2016 |
NY Times: Israel Changes Tack After Standoff With Brazil Over Dani Dayan
|
REBUTTAL
BY   In addition to its rejection of an American Union scheme and its affiliation
with Putin's BRICS, Brazil's hardline on Israel is another reason why the CIA / Mossad Axis of Evil has targeted the nation
with bad press and "color revolution" attempts. We learn in this very revealing article that after a months-long standoff over plans to install Dani Dayan, a
West Bank settler leader, as ambassador to Brazil,
has finally backed off — reassigning the loony Likudnik to a position in New York City (surprise surprise) after
the Brazilian government steadfastly refused to approve his appointment. Dayan will now focus his abilities on "bringing about a revolution
in Israeli public relations in North America." Speaking on Army Radio in Israel, Dayan, who made a fortune running
an information technology company, said his reassignment should not be seen as giving in to .
But that is exactly what just happened! He said, “Those that did not want us in Brasília got us
in New York, the capital of the world.” Interesting that Dayan should refer to New York as "capital of
the world" while at the same time talking about "bringing about a revolution
in Israeli public relations." He almost sounds like one of those "anti-Semites"
TM who traffic in "conspiracy
theories" TM.   Satanyahu vs Dilma Rousseff --
Brazil's condemnation of Israeli brutality and recognition of pre-1967 Palestinian borders has put the developing giant in
Zionist cross-hairs. . The story tells us that
Brazil, in 2011, formally recognized Palestinian statehood within the 1967 boundaries of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.
Any American politician who would openly support such boundaries would be crushed by "the Lobby" and blackballed
from polite society. As the impasse dragged on, Israel dug in its heels and threatened to downgrade its relations with Brazil and send a lower-level diplomat if Mr. Dayan was not accepted. As the standoff became increasingly embarrassing for Satanyahu, the reassignment of Dayan to New York provided a face-saving way out. In Brazil, Israel’s capitulation is seen as a victory for the embattled president, Dilma Rousseff. But don't get to comfortable Dilma! These patient devils NEVER quit. Expect the anti-Brazil campaign to intensify as the Olympics approaches. And watch out for an attack by 'ISIS' too!
  The Globo-Zio press will do whatever
it takes to put a sour note on Brazil's Olympic Games this summer. * Boobus
Americanus
1: I read a story
in the New York Times today about a rift between Brazil and Israel. Boobus
Americanus 2: What wrong with Brazil
lately? All I read is bad things about that country. "That'ss becausse all you read is Zionisst $#@*- @#&!" (Sugar, you have a unique talent for getting
right to the point!) COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
TUESDAY / MARCH 29, 2016 |
NY Times (Letter to the Editor): How the Republicans Lost the Surplus
|
REBUTTAL
BY A former Chief-of-Staff for former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi drops this absolute turd of an economic analysis in the form of a 'Letter to the Editor'. John Lawrence not only repeats the lie that "the Bush tax cuts" caused the Federal Budget deficit to skyrocket; but he ignores the fact that the unalterable long-term Obongo/Pelosi budget of 2009 ended up tripling the deficits that Bush and the Republicant's were racking up. Let's clean up this Marxist mess.
Pelosi's boy, John Lawrence, inks some massive economic whoppers for the 'Letters to the Editor' page
To the Editor: Lawrence: Re “You Budget. Why Shouldn’t Congress?,” by Nancy Pelosi (Op-Ed, March 22): As Chief of Staff to Representative George Miller, the California Democrat who developed the “pay as you go” deficit reduction plan in 1982, I would like to make two points. Rebuttal: Well, as Chief-of-Staff of The Anti-New
York Times, I would like to point out that the rhetorical tricks of 'establishing credentials' and name-dropping may dazzle
the easily-impressed, but it is not relevant to the discussion. A case should be argued on the facts and nothing else. Lawrence: Although Mr. Miller applied the same standard to all deficit-generating legislation — discretionary spending or tax policy — House Republicans always exempted tax cuts from requiring an equivalent offset, asserting that economic growth would compensate for revenue losses. Rebuttal: Growth-related revenue increase to the Federal Treasury is not an "assertion" -- it is a simple fact of mathematics that can be easily measured. Even a slowly growing economy will produce many billions of dollar in additional, taxable wealth. Economic growth drives the level of tax revenue far more so than any tweaking of tax rates.
Hey Professor Egghead! If tax cuts cause deficits, then why did revenues grow so rapidly even after the Reagan and Bush 43 tax cuts?
Lawrence: Under President George W. Bush, they went a step further and allowed the Paygo law that constricted spending in the 1990s to expire. Rebuttal: Democrats were right there with him! Lawrence: Unpaid-for tax cuts... Rebuttal: By "unpaid-for tax cuts", Lawerence means the imaginary increase in the deficit caused by the minor tax cuts. Again, it is growth that drives revenue, not minor adjustments in rates. Lawrence: the enactment of Medicare Part D... Rebuttal: Even broken clocks are correct twice a day. Lawrence gets this one right. Of course, he neglects to mention the fact that without the strong support of the Democrats, Bush's Medicare scheme would never have happened. Lawrence: ... and spending for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan soon dissipated the surpluses that had been projected because of Paygo discipline. Rebuttal: The broken clock is correct for the second time. Of course, he neglects to mention the fact that without the strong support which 70% of the Democrats, including then-Senator Killary Clinscum, Bush's wars would never have happened either.
The bloody bitch, and many other Democrats, were right there in Bush's corner as he launched the genocidal and budget-busting 'War on Terror'.
Lawrence: Republican Congresses have since sought to impose offsetting cuts only on domestic spending, including disaster aid, while ignoring such offsets for tax cuts, with predictable results. Rebuttal: Again, it is not necessary to "offset" tax cuts because revenues increase automatically due to economic growth. Even the Globalist socialist Economist Magazine conceded the reality of this economic maxim: "America
has seen high top rates of tax in the 1970s, followed by Reagan tax cuts, Clinton tax increases and Bush junior cuts. None
of it made much difference to the overall take. The two years with the lowest take were under the supposedly "socialist"
Obama (admittedly a function of the weak economy) and the highest tax take was under Clinton, at the height of the dotcom
boom in 2000." (Oct. 14, 2014) ***** Get it now? Boom = revenue growth = dimishing deficits or surpluses. And to the extent that tax cuts stimulate economic activity; those tax cuts, paradoxically, will often increase revenue! Conversely, a sluggish economy, combined with exploding welfare and warfare budgets, increases the deficit massively. Obongo, the Democrats, and the "moderate" Republicants have done exactly that -- which is why the United States is approaching $20 TRILLION in debt with unfunded liabilities of much more. That's the truth about the debt crisis; but don't expect scum like Lawrence and the libtard economists at the Slimes to ever tell you that. All that being said, we would like see tax rates, spending and revenues drastically fall because the money belongs in the private economy (our pockets).
* Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read a Letter-to-the-Editor in the New York Times today that explained how the Bush
tax cuts and the relaxation of pay-as-you-go policies led to the current budget crisis. Boobus
Americanus 2: Republicans
still believe that discredited myth about economic growth compensating for revenue loss caused by tax cuts. "It's not a myth you sstupid %$#@^(&. Even that commie-fag John Maynard
Keyness undersstood that growth drivess revenuess." (Where
did you learn about John Maynard Keynes, Sugar? That explains the scratch marks on so many pages of my library books!)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
MONDAY / MARCH 28, 2016 |
NY Times: In Donald Trump’s Worldview, America Comes First, and Everybody Else Pays
|
REBUTTAL
BY Though written by a pair of chosenites and tagged with a mocking headline, this article itself is actually fair and objective. Unfortunately, it is the headlines that leave the strongest impression. 'America First' may come as music to the ears of the average patriotic red-blooded American man-in-the-street-of-Heartland-USA -- but to New York City chosenites, Globalists, Marxists, Zionists and assorted libtards, the phrase is a Pavlovian attack bell that gets them to instant salivation and attack mode. The article quotes Trump: "Not isolationist, but I am America First,” he said. “I like the expression.” He said he was willing to reconsider traditional American alliances if partners were not willing to pay, in cash or troop commitments, for the presence of American forces around the world. “We will not be ripped off anymore,” he said. Admiral Chester Ward, once a "window dressing" member of the world-government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), put this term in proper perspective: "In the entire CFR lexicon, there is no term of revulsion carrying a meaning so deep as 'America First'”
In the book 'Kissinger on the Couch', co-authored with Phyllis Schlafly, Admiral Chester Ward gives us an insider's perspective on how much the term 'America First' repulses 'The Establishment'. Mrs. Schlafly (above, Image 3) has endorsed Donald Trump.
Over the course of the last century, in addition to Trump, there have been four other very well-known public figures whose political activism went forth unapologetically under the banner of 'America First'. Not at all coincidentally, each of these men are still hated with a demonic passion by the usual suspects. Hop into the time machine and see what we mean.
1920: WARREN HARDING After 120,000 American lives had been frittered away in the Great War (World War I), Ohio Senator Warren Harding and his running mate, Massachusetts Governor Calvin Coolidge, ran against liberal Democrat Globalists James Cox & Franklin D Roosevelt. Harding promised a "return to normalcy" and fierce opposition to ever joining the Globalist 'League of Nations'. Running with the slogan of 'America First', the Harding/Coolidge ticket cruised to a historic 2-1 landslide victory. Remember that the next time you hear about some "poll" of court-historians who always rank Harding as "the worst President in history" (here)
'America First' sloganeering originated with the "worst President", Warren Harding.
1941: CHARLES LINDBERGH The 2nd incarnation of 'America First' occurred during the anti-Roosevelt peace movement of 1940 & 1941. Charles Lindbergh, the famous aviator, became the figurehead of this powerful force that warned the public that "Roosevelt and the Jews" were plotting to drag the USA into World War II. The America First Committee quickly fizzled out after the justifiable Japanese attack on the US Navy based at Pearl Harbor, in what was then the territory of Hawaii. To the dwindling number of modern-day American's who know that
Lindbergh was the first man to fly across the Atlantic (1927), "Lucky Lindy" remains a heroic figure. But the chosenites
of academia have always reviled him for being "pro-Nazi" -- and his father, Congressman Charles Lindbergh
(R-MN), for being anti-Federal
Reserve and "anti-Semitic" TM. Perhaps that explains the bizarre
kidnapping and murder of the great aviator's baby boy -- which conveniently took place during Passover of 1932.
1- Lindbergh was decorated by German Air Marshal Goering (1938) 2- Dr. Suess cartoons often ridiculed Lindbergh. The one above depicts goose-stepping American "fascists" supporting Lindbergh. *
1- 1941: Lindbergh speaks before the 'America First Committee' -- warns about FDR and "jewish influence". 2- "Heil Lindbergh" -- Lindbergh was attacked for accepting a medal from Hitler's Germany. 3- 2004 bestseller, 'The Plot Against America', by Philip Roth (cough cough) tells of a fictional scenario in which Henry Ford and "President" Charles Lindbergh engineered a 'Nazi' takeover of America.
1991: DAVID DUKE & PAT BUCHANAN After incumbent Republican President George HW Bush the Elder openly declared that he was working to establish a "New World Order", former Ku Klux Klansmen David Duke kicked-off a Republican primary challenge against him. Older readers may recall that former Ku Klux Klansmen David Duke was actually quite popular back then; and that the slogan that former Ku Klux Klansmen David Duke chose for his campaign was 'America First'. In order to derail former Ku Klux Klansmen David Duke and keep the term 'America First' somewhat "respectable", conservative political commentator Patrick J Buchanan also threw his hat into the ring and adopted the term. With the 'America First' vote thus diluted (perhaps by Buchanan's design?) Globalist Bush was able to fend-off the nationalist challenge. Buchanan would run again in 1995-96. That campaign (against Bob Dole) started out well, but crashed after relentless media attacks took their toll on "Pitchfork Pat". As for former Ku Klux Klansmen David Duke, his name still remains toxic -- unfortunate given the excellent books and articles he has written.
The 1990's smear campaign against "America Firsters" Buchanan and Duke were intense and dishonest.
Yes, Admiral Ward was indeed correct. Say it again, Admiral: "In the entire CFR lexicon, there is no term of revulsion carrying a meaning so deep as 'America First'” Be careful, Mr. Trump.
Someone just went through a lot of trouble and money to have a Donald Trump tombstone erected in New York's Central Park (here) *
Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read in The New York Times today that Trump is adopting the highly provocative
term, 'America First' to describe his foreign policy. Boobus
Americanus 2:
The anti-Semitic overtones of that slogan are very unsettling. "If either Buchanan or former Ku Klux Klanssman David Duke had been elected
Pressident we wouldn't have fought the dissastrous Iraq war that you libtardss are alwayss crying about. Ever think of that, you sstupid $#@*&^#!" (Boobuses don't think. That's the whole problem.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com IT'S
HERE!!!!
|
|
FRIDAY / MARCH 25, 2016 |
NY Times (International Section): Israel Soldier Detained in Shooting of Palestinian
|
REBUTTAL
BY
In this day and age of 24-hour news coverage and I-phone / You Tube viral videos; there are times when members of
the Israel Defense Forces will commit, on camera, an act of such bloody and brazen brutality that Sulzberger's Slimes, in
order to retain the illusion of "objectivity", has to -- repeat, has to report about
the incident. When this happens, you can be sure the story will be covered only for a day and usually in the back pages. That's
the trick.
Regarding those rare cases when the "objective" Slimes is compelled to hit its fellow Tribesmen in Israel, the attack will be brief and usually buried in the International Section.
And so it is with the Slimes' report of this beyond barbaric murder of an unarmed and unconscious Palestinian man -- shot in the head for good measure as he lay helpless on the ground. The story is duly watered-down and buried on page 6 of the International Section. An Israeli spokesman, quoted by Slimes reporter Isabel Kershner (cough cough) assures us: “The I.D.F. views this incident as a grave breach of I.D.F. values, conduct and standards of military operations,” Lt. Col. Peter Lerner, an army spokesman, said of the event, referring to the Israeli military. “A military police investigation has commenced and the soldier involved has been detained.” You see, Kershner's cover-up neither denies nor justifies the shocking incident. That would be far too obvious of a whitewash in light of what was actually captured on this horrific viral video (here, starts at about 1:45). The trick here involves blaming a single out-of-control soldier; and then highlighting how "Israeli authorities" are "detaining" him while they "investigate" the matter.
The Palestinian man laying in the street is either unconscious or playing so out of fear. After moving his head, the Israel soldier (with rifle in air) cocks his weapon and blasts him in the head. That's when the blood starts flowing.
Even more disturbing than the execution head-shot is the cold-hearted indifference of the numerous soldiers and security officers seen in the video. After the killer-shot is fired, no one even so much as bats an eyelash or says to the killer, "Oy vey dude! What the heck is wrong with you?” Clearly, the problem here is much more widespread that just this one soldier. Again, just to make it look good, the article, in its lower paragraphs, quotes a "good Jew", Ms. Sarit Michaeli, who blames “the public climate in " and "virtually every politician condoning the notion” (that Palestinian attackers should be killed). Lost in this whole "debate" about how many soldiers are "out of control", and what exactly constitutes excessive force, is the "big picture" of a terrorist state -- armed, funded and protected by the wholly kosherized United States -- that has been brutalizing the dispossessed Palestinians for the past 70 years now. The problem isn't this one killer-soldier, or even hundreds of killer-soldiers. It's Zionism itself. But don't hold your breath waiting for Yenta Isabel Kershner to touch the broader topic.
Shhhhh! Let's slap a nobody soldier on the wrist, but don't ever talk about the "big picture" behind the problem. *
Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read in The New York Times today that Israeli
military officials have detained a soldier who shot a Palestinian man in the head as he lay on the ground. Boobus
Americanus 2:
Oh? I must have missed that story. I guess it was in the inner pages. At least Israeli
authorities are disciplining him. "You frickin' moron! Issraeli authoritiess are the ones who
caussed this murder and thoussandss more like it!" (Right on Sugar! In the big scheme of things, the murder of this poor fellow is nothing
compared to Bibi Satanyahu's phosphorous terror bombings of Gaza.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com IT'S
HERE!!!!
|
|
THURSDAY / MARCH 24, 2016 |
NY Times: Obama Declares a New Partnership After Talks With Argentine Leader
NY Times: Crisis in Brazil Widens With Report of Firm’s Payments to Politicians
|
REBUTTAL
BY
The tricky thing about fighting cancer is that if you don't kill all
of the cancer cells, the deadly disease will return. As it is with cancer, so too it is with Globalism. Unless all of the
cancer cells (agents and dupes) are uprooted and killed, the seemingly recovered patient will ultimately succumb
once again.
Unless every last cell is killed, the threat remains. * Funded by western bankers (cough cough), the cancer returned with a vengeance to Tsarist Russia in 1917 -- a full 12 years after the 1905 Communist Revolution had been put down and its leaders arrested or exiled.
The Czar was able to put down the 1905 Revolution (Image 1). When the domestic cancer returned in 1917, it cost him and his entire family their lives. * Funded again by western bankers (cough cough), the cancer (in the form of FDR 1932) returned with a vengeance to the United States -- again, 12 years after the Globalism and Marxism of Woodrow Wilson had been thoroughly repudiated and reversed with the 1920 'America First' election of President Warren G. Harding and Vice President Calvin Coolidge.
After enjoying the benefits of consecutive 'America Firster' Presidents, FDR was installed in 1932. America hasn't been the same country ever since. * Funded again by western bankers (cough cough) and the CIA, the cancer (in the form of the 2014 coup) returned to Ukraine -- just 4 years after pro-Russian Viktor Yanukovych was elected President.
Ukraine and Russia were building a warm and mutually beneficial relationship (Image 1) -- but then the cancer, fed from the outside, came back to Kiev.
Now, more than 10 years after the South American giants of Brazil and Argentina, socialist and corrupt though they may be, killed the Globalist scheme to establish the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), both countries are in danger of being sucked back into the orbit of evil -- as this double-dip coverage in Sulzberger's Slimes clearly reveals to those of us who monitor these developments. Argentina: From the article: “The United States stands ready to work with Argentina through this historic transition in any way that we can,” President Obama said at a news conference Wednesday with the Argentine president, Mauricio Macri." As we exposed in our Anti-New York Times piece of March 16, Argentina's brand new President, Mauricio Macri, is an Ivy League globo-boy, recently puffed-up by CBS's '60 Minutes'. That's why Obongo went to Argentina to "repair relations" with Argentina; and it is also the real reason why the U.S. is "opening up" to Castro's Cuba.
Now that Putin's girl in Argentina is gone, wonder-boy Macri is being puffed-up by Globalists and their media mouthpieces.
Brazil: From the other article: "Political leaders are bracing for more revelations to emerge that could further tarnish a broad spectrum of Brazil’s political class. Among the 594 members in Brazil’s Congress, 271 face serious charges." The revelations of these scandals (real or not) as well the convenient outbreak of "the Zika virus" (real or not) and many other anti-Brazilian moves have all been engineered by the Globalist hand. The goal for Brazil is the same as it was for Argentina -- to replace an independent-minded socialist President / government with a cancerous New World Order socialist President / government. Should this project succeed, it would only be a matter of time before the FTAA, or some watered-down variation, is reintroduced. Yes indeed; unless you mercilessly kill
every last one of its cells, Globalism,
like cancer, never quits.
Throwing bricks at BRICS -- the Globalists are trying to stir up a "color revolution" in Brazil so that they can bring back the FTAA scheme. *
Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read in The New York Times today that big changes are happening
in Argentina and Brazil. Boobus Americanus 2: Yes. Brazil especially seems to be going through turmoil. "Nothing is what it sseems, Boobuss. It's all one big frickin' consspiracy!" (Yes
it is. Once you know the code, seemingly unrelated and complex world events become very easy to read.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
WEDNESDAY / MARCH 23, 2016 |
NY Times: Brussels Airport and Subway Explosions Kill 34
|
REBUTTAL
BY
  "Fake!
Fake! Frickin' fake! As fake as the Sandy Hook non-shooting! As fake as the Boston Smoke-Bomb! As fake as the Charleston Church
non-shooting! As fake as the San Bernadino non-shooting. As fake as Moochele Obongo's womanhood! As
fake as ..." OK Sugar. We get the point! Let's at least be grateful for the fact that the clandestine
services appear to have stopped killing innocent people and are using invented identities, 'crisis actors' and red paint instead.
How merciful of them! Let's review a few of the soon-to-be "iconic" photos of these two fake false-flag attacks (Brussels
airport and Brussels Metro).   1- Bloodied man on floor -- looking directly at the camera as person just
casually walks by him, not even noticing . Say "Cheese" buddy! 2- Same man -- with side of face covered in theatrical dirt. Red paint all over the floor
around him -- but none on his pants? Notice the lack of any grimace and no evident concern for his "leg wound". *  1- No 'crisis actor' scheme is complete without the distressed woman on
her cell phone. Fake blood on her hand. Fake dust all throughout her friend's hair and face as she looks into the camera.
2- The usual
fake scene at the sidewalk -- just like the Boston Smoke Bomb Hoax. *   1- Debris pattern resembles stage props more so than the chaotic aftermath
of a massive explosion. 2-
Cop or security official of some sort looks at "victim" as he just walks right on by? Nice multi-cultural touch
by having the Black guy carry an injured little blonde boy to ...to....to where? *   1- Fake blood stain on her left knee
and one on her right ankle as she looks for a camera. A few stains on her son's jeans too. Why does he seem so bored by the
whole affair, and not even concerned with his own injury? 2- This is NOT how to transport injured people! Soldiers
and security officials would know that. Where's the stretcher? Where are they bringing him to? Are there no ambulances in
Brussels? *  Too much wrong with this photo:
Face splattered with fake blood in an impossible pattern and not even being wiped -- being given oxygen but not being treated
for lacerations-- still holding her cell phone as if nothing happened -- as the hero shows us his best drama look, straight
into the camera. *
As the stupid story goes,
an unnamed Iraqi intelligence official is claiming that an unnamed source in Syria told his agency that ISIS is behind
the terrorist attacks in Brussels (he said that he said). What does this really mean? It means that the
CIA-Mossad complex hasn't given up on its obsession to drag the U.S. and the E.U. into Syria for the purpose of    1- Some really bad acting. Next time, use an onion, sweetie. 2- The subway blast occured at 9:11 Belgian time (here)-- on 3-22. How conveeenient! *
Boobus
Americanus
1: What a tragedy in Brussels, eh? Boobus Americanus 2: Sickening! Obama has got to do something on the ground in Syria to stop ISIS. "It'ss frickin' fake! It'ss all frickin' fake! Once we
get tricked into Ssyria the misssion will change to overthowing Asssad sso that Issrael can expand!" (Preach it, Sugar. Preach it!) COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com Bibi Satanyahu takes credit for all terror attacks (in code language, that is) |
|
TUESDAY / MARCH 22, 2016 |
NY Times: Donald Trump Calls Himself ‘Lifelong Supporter’ of Israel
y ALAN RAPPEPORT
Donald J. Trump expressed his solidarity with Israel in passionate terms on Monday, promising a gathering of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee that as president he would always stand up for it against its enemies in the Middle East.
|
REBUTTAL
BY The bullet-points of Trump's speech: The Bad
  It was observed that Trump's raw
red-meat pleased the Judaic jackals who "warmed" to the bellicose rhetoric
with cheers and applause.
The Good
   The
North Atlantic Terrorist Organization has got to go!
Though having to tightly hold our noses through the obligatory
rah-rah-we-love-Israel-always-and-forever crap, Trump's non-interventionism and unprecedented questioning of America's role
in funding NATO compensated nicely. Parts of the speech could have been written by Ron Paul! Let just hope that the anti-Iran
and anti-Palestinian garbage were just hollow bones that Trump had to throw to these kosher carnivores to keep them at bay. Trump's jabs at NATO prompted House Speaker and Globalist butt-boy Paulie Ryan to come to NATO's defense during his own subsequent speech before the kosher council of kookdom. We can only imagine what the scum in Brussels, Berlin, Paris, London and Rome will soon have to say about Trump's "isolationism" - TM. On another positive note, Trump just reaffirmed, during a meeting with the Editorial Board of the Washington Compost, that he is indeed serious about non-interventionism. He told the Compost: "I do think it’s a different world today, and I
don’t think we should be nation-building anymore. I think it’s proven not to work, and we have a different country
than we did then. We have $19 trillion in debt. We’re sitting, probably, on a bubble. And it’s a bubble that
if it breaks, it’s going to be very nasty. I just think we have to rebuild our country." He added: "I watched as we built schools in Iraq and they’re blown up. We build another one, we get blown up. We rebuild it three times and yet we can’t build a school in Brooklyn. We have no money for education because we can’t build in our own country. At what point do you say, 'Hey, we have to take care of ourselves?' So, I know the outer world exists and I’ll be very cognizant of that. But at the same time, our country is disintegrating, large sections of it, especially the inner cities."
  1- Trumps non-interventionism sounds much like that of Ron Paul. 2- Trump-basher Paulie Ryan leaped to NATO's defense.
Trump also listed members of a team chaired by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) that is counseling him on foreign affairs and helping to shape his policies: Keith Kellogg, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Walid Phares and Joseph E. Schmitz. Proclaims the Globalist-Communist 'Daily Beast' in its headline about Trump's advisers: Donald Trump’s New Foreign Policy Advisers Are as Rotten as His SteaksBy Shane Harris / March 21, 2016 Harris especially hates Carter Page for his position on Russian relations. He writes of Mr. Page: "Page has criticized the Obama administration's policy towards Russia, going so far as to accuse Victoria Nuland, an assistant secretary of state, of “misguided and provocative actions” and “fomenting” the revolution that ousted Ukrainian president and Putin ally Viktor Yanukovych from power in 2014." Another positive point in favor of Trump! In the grand scheme of things, Trump's undeniable desire to work with Putin and weaken NATO "trumps" (pun intended) the mushy manure he had to spread thick before the AIPAC tribunal. Surely, a man as intelligent as Donald Trump knows that Russia and China will allow no harm to come to Iran. Therefore, Trump's tough talk won't mean much. Even if some level of sanctions are reimposed to appease the chosenites, fast-developing Iran can make up the business elsewhere, as Russia has. As for the Palestinians, a President Trump, like his predecessors, will probably have no choice but to keep his mouth shut as Bibi Satanyahu continues to torment these poor people -- weak little lambs who may have to be sacrificed if Trump is to retain enough first-term political clout to defuse the Globalist drive for World War III.
Putin and Trump can save the world from Killary and World War III
*
Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read in
today's New York Times that Trump came out really strong in favor of Israel during his AIPAC
speech.
Boobus
Americanus
2: Yes. He seemed to take a much stronger pro-Israel
line than he did previously. "Trump sshould have gone full Hitler and told AIPAC to go @^&% themselvess!" (That's easy for us bloggers to say, Sugar. But
in politics, you have to kiss ass before you can kick it.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
MONDAY / MARCH 21, 2016 |
NY Times: Donald Trump Courts Wary Jewish Voters
Donald J. Trump, whose disregard for the sensitivities of various religious and ethnic groups has hit a nerve among Jewish organizations, faces a difficult sell Monday.
|
REBUTTAL
BY In
fairness to Trump, the dirty game of reality politics requires that due respect be paid to these people. At that level
of the game, a direct frontal assault against the Beast and its many millions of deluded Christian-Zionist cheerleaders
would amount to a political suicide mission. The way to work around these mighty maniacs is to bow before them as you plot
against them. Rent 'Godfather II' and observe how masterfully Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) plays the Jewish mobster
Hyman Roth (Lee Srasberg) -- who also plays against Michael at the same time.   Godfather II - Michael Corleone and
Hyman Roth -- Master chess players who duel to the death as they smile and praise each other. Michael wins in the end as Roth
is arrested and assassinated. This is not to suggest that Trump, whose own daughter is married to
an Orthodox Jew, is a secret enemy of Israel and the Jewish elite. But as even this article confirms, Trump's independence
and stated willingness to pursue a "neutral" Middle East policy has got more than a few "wary" chosenites
up in arms. His 'America Firstism' certainly isn't endearing him to the notoriously cosmopolitan Jewish One-Worlders
either. From the article: "They cringed at his trafficking in Jewish stereotypes
and recoiled when he hesitated
before denouncing David Duke, the Ku Klux Klan figure." --- "Mr. Trump also stumbled when he waded into one of America’s most charged
foreign policy issues, promising to remain a “neutral” broker between Israelis and Palestinians. For the many Jews who side with Israel in its dealings with Palestinians — a number of whom are AIPAC members — “that was like fingernails across the chalkboard,” said Ari Fleischer, the former spokesman for President George W. Bush. Mr. Trump later modified his position to be more pro-Israel, but his wavering left many unconvinced." If Bush mouthpiece Ari Fleischer is "wary" about Trump, then that's a definite plus. The notorious 9/11 PNAC plotter William Kristol is also "wary" of Trump: “Israel benefits from a strong, consistent, reliable America,” said William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly Standard, who has been one of Mr. Trump’s most vocal conservative critics. “I don’t think that would be Trump’s America.” And the Harvard Marxist and noted "anti-racist" Alan Dershowitz is equally "wary": “The way he dillydallied with David Duke basically sent a message that was perceived by many in the Jewish community as he’s looking for any votes he can get from the hard right,” said Alan M. Dershowitz, the defense lawyer. To Mr. Dershowitz, the problem is not simply Mr. Trump; it is the white supremacists who have rallied around his candidacy. “It’s quite frightening to see who supports him,” he said. With enemies like Fleischer, Kristol and Dershowitz, Trump's decision to speak at AIPAC isn't as disturbing as a patriot might believe at first glance.    Fleischer -- Kristol -- Dershowitz:
three wretched monsters who are "wary" of Trump's speech before AIPAC. Though not
mentioned in this article, Trump's respectful words for Vladimir Putin and his stated desire to "get along with Russia"
have also ruffled the feathers of the 'Greater Israel' crowd that had hoped to topple Assad of Syria -- only to see those
hopes dashed by Russia's military rescue of the Assad government. Speaking of Putin, those who have read 'The War Against
Putin' will recall how Bad Vlad initially courted and negotiated with the Jewish Oligarchs who had raped Russia
during the Yeltsin years. Once Putin had consolidated his power, the gangsters who weren't thrown in jail ended up exiled
in Israel or the UK. As Don Corleone would say, "Keep your friends close. Keep your enemies closer." Might 'The Donald', a man that no one - in light of the fact that his own daughter
is now a Jew - can accuse of being "anti-Semitic" TM, be plotting to
carry out some lesser variation of a 'Corleone-Putin' scenario? We cannot say for certain at this time. But neither
can the Zionist Mafia -- which is why they are so "wary" of Don Trumpeone.   1- When Zionist mobster Khodorkovsky was all-powerful in
Russia, the new President Putin played nice-nice with him. 2-
After Putin established himself, the tables were turned. Khodorkovsky was arrested in 2003 and spent the next decade in jail. Putin:
"I have eaten enough dirt from that man (Khodorkovsky)." *
Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read in today's New
York Times that many Jews are wary of Trump's intentions.
Boobus
Americanus
2:
I don't blame them. Trump said he wants to be a neutral broker -- as if there
is actually an equivalence between Palestinians and the Israelis! * "You're right Boobus! There iss no equivalence. Bibi Ssatanyahu resspondss
to the alleged killing of 1 Issraeli by killing 1000 Palestinianss in retaliation!" (Not to mention the fact that they terrorized them off of their historical
lands and farms without paying so much as a dime in compensation.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
SUNDAY / MARCH 20, 2016 |
NY Times: European Union Reaches Deal With Turkey to Return New Asylum Seekers
The move to send migrants who arrive in Greece back to Turkey was a significant step amid a crisis that has left tens of thousands of people in squalid conditions.
|
REBUTTAL
BY
Constricting snakes instinctively 'know' that the secret to killing their prey before eating them is to tighten the death grip each time the rodent exhales. Each new exhalation (emptying of the lungs) provides the snake that much more space to constrict the poor exhausted creature further and further. As it is
with snakes, a clever Globalist-Marxist knows when to pause the pressure on his squirming victims (us!)
and when to start squeezing again. That's exactly what the European Union is doing here. After a 15 month period in which
as many as 1.5 million Turd
World invaders broke into Europe, the Globalists feel it necessary to lighten up a bit on their death grip. In doing
so, the growing outrage and passionate political activism of the native European people will soon yield to an "exhalation"
-- followed by an even tighter constriction.
Squeeze - relax. Squeeze - relax. The EU snakes know better than to try and kill their victims too quickly.
This much-publicized announcement, which decrees that new migrants passing from Turkey though Greece are to be returned, will pause some of the pressure. But the mostly male roaches who have already scurried into the house of Europa are there to stay; and the ones arriving in Italy by way of post-Qaddafi Libya will keep on arriving as well. In due time, we can expect the Turkey-Greece return policy to go unenforced, if it ever gets enforced at all. A ton of media hype about the new "crackdown", combined with a few diversionary football (soccer) games, and Boobus Europiticus will soon be able to "exhale" again -- rendering him primed and ready for the next level of strangulation. Until Boobus Europiticus (and Americanus) comes to understand that the great game is not meant to end until the very last non-Jewish White Man has been genetically blended out, or died out due to old age -- the snake will resume his death grip again and again and again. It won't stop until Europa is too tightly squeezed and exhausted to offer any resistance at all. That is the basis of the "Kalergi Plan". Richard Coudenhove Kalergi Kalergi was the son of an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi
and a Japanese woman named Mitsu Aoyama. With his movement financially backed by Zionist billionaires such as Rothschild,
Baruch and Warburg, Kalergi, thanks to his close contacts European aristocrats and politicians,
managed to attract the most important heads of state to his project for European integration -- what Winston Churchill openly
referred to, in 1945, as the "United States of Europe." Very few people know that Kalergi, one of the main "founding fathers" of the process
of European integration also designed the genocide for the peoples of Europe. As far back as 1922, Kalergi founded the "Pan-European" movement in Austria, which aimed
to create a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a future
world government. With the rise of Mussolini
in Italy, The Great One in Germany and Franco in Spain, Kalergi's 'One Europe' project was put on hold. But after the
defeat of Germany, Kalergi's New World Order, thanks to the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish B'nai B'rith and major
newspapers like the New York Slimes, began to take its first visible steps toward fruition.   In order for Kalergi's openly-described
New Europe to rise, European Fascism had to fall. In his book 'Praktischer
Idealismus', Kalergi boldly declares that the citizens of the future "United States of Europe" will
not be White people anymore. In his own words: "The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with the diversity of individuals. Of course, Kalergi's chosenite paymasters
will not be replaced by this "Eurasian-negroid race of the future".
Writes the hired hack of his paymasters: "Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated
this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It's
not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the
compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy
crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews." The Kalergi plan is the New World Order plan, and it's not just for Europe. White genocide is very real and is playing out exactly as Kalergi and his handlers envisioned it. That is the real reason why World War II was imposed upon Hitler and Mussolini; and it is also the real reason why the Marshall Plan contained hidden provisions for unifying Europe; and it is also the reason why the Frumpy Frau of Germany is acting as "stupidly" as she is. Speaking of manly Marxist Merkel; for her slavish devotion to European Unionism, the wicked wench received the "prestigious" Charlemagne Prize in 2010 --- mistakingly referred to by some as the Kalergi Prize because Kalergi was its very first recipient.
1- Merkel shows off her 'Kalergi Prize' in 2010 2- What's being sold as "tolerance" among the races is really a fiendishly cunning Jewish Supremacist plot to genocide all Europeans out of existence.
Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in today's New York Times that the European Union is cracking
down on the mass migrations passing through Turkey.
Boobus
Americanus
2: They have taken in more than enough.
It's a good call. * "You sstupid #@&^%! That nassty %&@$ Merkel will jusst find another
way to them in!" (Sugar, if you don't clean
up that potty-mouth of yours, I'm going to feed you to that Boa.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
FRIDAY / MARCH 18, 2016 |
NY Times (Column): ‘Big Government’ Looks Great When There Is None
|
REBUTTAL
BY Reductio ad absurdum (Latin: "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin: "argument to absurdity"), is a form of logically fallacious argument which is often used to demonstrate that a given statement is false by claiming that an absurd result follows from its acceptance. Here is how 'reductio / argumentum ad absurdum' might play out between a married couple: Mrs. Smith: Honey, I test drove a beautiful brand new Lexus IS convertible today -- only $59,000. Mr. Smith: That's a bit much for us to be paying for a car, don't you think? (here it comes) Mrs. Smith: Well, I am
absolutely not going to buy some $500 broken-down, rusted out '89 Chevy with 300,000 miles on it -- if that's what you're
thinking! (Yikes! Reminds me of --- never mind --- I better not say!)
1- The Greek and Roman philosophers of antiquity had a term for every form of logical fallacy and rhetorical trick there was --- which is exactly why the classics are no longer taught in public government schools! 2- 'Argumentum ad absurdum' can cause a civil discourse to deteriorate into an ugly argument. That's because the target of the illogic finds it disrespectful and infuriating.
The seditious scum at Sulzberger's Slimes are as notorious as they are skilled at utilizing this manipulative form of argument. This column by Nicholas Kristoff (cough cough) is as outrageous of an example of this logical fallacy as you will ever find. The point that Kristoff wishes to "disprove" is the opinion expressed by "Republican candidates" that the Federal government is too big and too intrusive. To make his case, Crazy Kristoff cites South Sudan! Just get a load of this juvenile 'reductio / argumentum ad absurdum': "After hearing Republican presidential candidates denounce big government and burdensome regulation, I’d like to invite them to spend the night here in the midst of the civil war in . You hear gunfire, competing with yowls of hyenas, and you don’t curse taxes. Rather, you yearn for a government that might install telephones, hire a 911 operator and dispatch the police. From afar, one sees the United States differently. Donald Trump and Ted Cruz seem to think that America’s Achilles heels are immigration and an activist government. But from the perspective of a war zone, these look more like national strengths. Indeed, take what Trump is clamoring for: weaker government, less regulation, a more homogeneous society. In some sense, you find the ultimate extension of all that right here."
So, you see, if we try to mildly scale back the ever-growing cost of our $4 Trillion per year Federal Government (about $40,000 in tax extortion per household!), not only might the sounds of "gunfire and hyenas" terrorize us, but there won't even be any 911 dispatchers and police to come to our assistance! Those damn Republicans!
"Hyenas and gunfire, oh my! Please don't cut my taxes! Oh please, please don't cut my taxes!"
"No regulation! No long lines at the D.M.V., because there is no D.M.V. in the conflict areas. In practice, no taxes or gun restrictions. No Obamacare. No minimum wage. No welfare state to breed dependency. No sticky rules about eminent domain. And certainly no immigration problem." Dear
Lord, please restrain me from taking that 30 minute bus ride into Marxist Manhattan and stomping this evil little putrid punk
like the filthy cockroach that he is! Even by the low-down and deviously dirty standards of Sulzberger's Slimes, this extreme
form of 'reductio / argumentum ad absurdum' is surprising to behold because the Yellow Journalists are generally more subtle in
their application of logical / rhetorical fallacies. Tragically, many a libtard will repeat the cunning cockroach's convoluted argument without even pausing to consider that maybe, just maybe, there exists a reasonable 'middle-ground' between South Sudanese lawlessness and societal breakdown on the one hand, and an ever-expanding Federal government - that is racking up $1 Trillion dollar deficits, year after year after year - on the other. Oh, by the way -- Sulzberger's Slimes were big cheerleaders for the artificial Globalist creation of the new state of South Sudan and hence, the "paper of record" is partially responsible for the civil / proxy war. And that, dear reader, is the real reason why the region is such a chaotic disaster. But we digress.
1- 2-"Hey, I resent the comparison! At least I don't lie to millions of people!"
Boobus
Americanus
1: I read an op-ed piece by Nick Kristoff in today's New York Times.
Kristoff cites the chaos in South Sudan as an example of what a society without governance deteriorates into. Conservatives
ought to take note.
Boobus
Americanus
2: That's
an excellent rebuttal to right-wing whining about government being too big. * "Krisstoff iss laughing at you frickin' idiotss! Haven't you ever read
Greek philossophy?" (Those dopes couldn't
even figure out the lessons behind Aesop's Fables!)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
THURSDAY / MARCH 17, 2016 |
NY Times: Obama Chooses Merrick Garland for Supreme Court
|
REBUTTAL
BY
"White Anglo-Ssaxon my asss! Google this character and I bet he turnss
out to be a Tribessman." You know, Sugar, your hastiness
to label everything a conspiracy and everyone a Tribesman risks undermining the credibility of our important work
here at The Anti-New York Times. But just to shut your little potty-mouth up, let's play your game of Google. Search: Merrick Garland Jewish Result:
The Forward Title: Merrick Garland
Offers Poignant Story About Anti-Semitism “My grandparents left the Pale of Settlement…in the early 1900’s, fleeing anti-Semitism and hoping to make a better life for their children in America,” Garland told reporters in the Rose Garden, flanked by President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden." (here) That damn cat is always right!
Garland will join Breyer and Hebrew hotties Kagan, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor (Jewish Marrano ancestry, "of Mayer" (here)) on what will be a 5-4 majority kosher court!
Clearly, the Left's high-minded talk of "diversity" does not apply to White non-Jewish males, and especially not to those of Anglo-Saxon, Dutch, Scandinavian or German ancestry -- pure Aryan sub-groups which still constitute a majority, though shrinking fast, of the American demograhic. A review of Obongo's appointments to the Supreme Court, the Federal Reserve, and the most important Cabinet and advisory positions confirms that race-based discrimination against White males is in fact official policy.
Warmonger and Israel-boot-licker Ashton Carter is the only true White male among the top tier of key appointees (we exclude Biden because the first Black candidate for President had to choose a White running mate). Even if we were to accept, for arguments sake, this dubious doctrine of handing down appointments proportional to the race and sex composition of society at large -- about one third of the aforementioned positions still should have been filled by White men. In legal parlance, such a contradiction of the laws of probability constitutes what is
known as 'prima facie' (first face) evidence of anti-White male discrimination -- orchestrated, of course, by
the usual suspects. This blatant discrimination is as illegal, as it is undeniable, as it is 'in-your-face'. But
dare to point it out and all the fury of hell will be unleashed upon you! Yes indeed, you've come a long way, America.
The total dispossession of a great nation: The Anglo Supremes 1910 vs. The Judaic Supremes of 2015
“If you say in your heart, ‘These nations are greater than I. How can I dispossess them? But do not be afraid of them; remember well what the LORD your God did to Pharaoh and to all Egypt." -- The Torah Book of Deuteronomy, Chapter 7: Verses 18-19
Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in
today's New York Times that Obama just nominated a moderate
for the Supreme Court. Boobus
Americanus
2: I probably shouldn't
say this (glancing over shoulder, hunching forward, and then whispering) -- but it's nice to see a White male get thrown a
bone from time to time. * "White my asss. He'ss of the Assiatic Tribe that hass disspossesssed
the ssleeping sonss of Europa." (Merrick
Garland -- indeed! Sounds like a frickin' English nobleman!) COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
WEDNESDAY / MARCH 16, 2016 |
NY Times: Argentina: Navy Sinks Chinese Boat Fishing Illegally
|
REBUTTAL
BY What's up with the Argentinian Coast Guard shelling and sinking a Chinese fishing boat? Fortunately, all 20 + crewmen were saved; but what would have happened if some of them had been killed? China is already demanding a full investigation of the matter. Could it be that the recently-forged Argentinian-Chinese love boat may be "sinking" soon? (pun intended) Seriously, what the hell is going on with all these cheap shots on China lately? Whether the boat was fishing "illegally" or not, such an over-reaction against an unarmed civilian vessel, coming from a very friendly trading partner, doesn't seem to make any sense -- or does it?
Argentinian Coast Guard vs the Lu Yan Yuan, a harmless fishing boat -- a bit of a mismatch, yes?
During the 12-year run of the back-to-back presidencies of the since-deceased
Nestor de Kirchner (2003-2007) and his wife, Cristina Fernadez de Kirchner (2007-2015),
the Front for Victory faction of the Justicialist Party had cultivated close trade relations with China
(and Russia). During a 3-day 2014 visit to the Latin American giant, Chinese boss man Xi Jimping
stated: "Our two countries find themselves at a historic crossroads. We have just marked 10 years in the strategic association between Argentina and China and the time has come to open new horizons." Xi and Cristina signed more than 20 trade deals in hydro-power, marine and rail industries worth $7 billion. The countries also announced Chinese plans to help Argentina build its fourth nuclear plant. Among the agreements was a "strategic partnership" similar to one inked with nations such as Brazil. Xi added: "I want to emphasize that we have signed an agreement to raise the level of our relations in order to turn them into a strategic partnership, along with investments in oil, mining, the nuclear field, agriculture and plant diseases," Less than one year later Ms. de Kirchner visited China. More love --- and more deals! Combine this romance with China with Cristina's love for Russia, and Cristina's support for the oppressed Palestinians, and Cristina's support for Assad, and Cristina's support for Iran, and - let us never forget - her hubby's role in helping to kill the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas); and the celebration of Sulzberger's Slimes over the defeat of Cristina Kirchner's hand-picked successor in Argentina's recent December election becomes easy to solve.
Xi in Argentina / Cristina in China
In spite of being much closer to the left-wing de Kirchner and her Party in terms of economic idiocy, Obongo wasted no time in telephoning and congratulating Argentina's new "conservative" President, Mauricio Macri. Obongo and Sulzberger aren't the only ones puffing-up Macri. The new 'pro-American' President, who graduated from Columbia Business School in New York, has also been portrayed positively in the pages of Foreign Affairs -- the mouthpiece of the world-government-promoting CFR (Council on Foreign Relations). It is still too early to judge if this aggressive over-reaction, just 3 months into Macri's reign, was engineered by the very same geo-political forces that have been prompting puppet Vietnam and puppet Philippines to recklessly poke the Chinese Dragon in the eye. Let's see what further details and consequences emerge in the coming days. But our hunch here is that if the Kirchner group had still been running the show, this event would never have occurred.
1- Biden and Macri make eyes. 2- New York's Colombia University Business School generally churns out budding one-worlders.
Boobus
Americanus
1:
I read in today's New York Times
that Argentina just sank a Chinese fishing boat. Boobus
Americanus
2: That sounds like a bit of an over-reaction.
Let's hope that the new President of Argentina can smooth this out with China. * "Don't count on it Boobuss. Macri is CIA!" (Your instincts are probably right -- again.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
WEDNESDAY / MARCH 9, 2016 |
NY Times: Maria Sharapova Admits Taking Meldonium, Drug Newly Banned by Tennis
NY Times: Maria Sharapova’s Admission Sends Her Sponsors Fleeing
|
REBUTTAL
BY
Her real offense? -- Maria is a beautiful blond Aryan Orthodox
Christian from the country headed by Vladimir Putin -- who is a big fan of Sharapova. Making matters worse, she refuses to
renounce her Russian citizenship and become an American, even though she has lived in Florida since she was seven years old.
The
Daily Mail: Maria Sharapova Says She is Proud to be Russian and Would Never Turn Her Back on Her Homeland (here) Get
the picture now? |
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com
|
TUESDAY / MARCH 8, 2016 |
NY Times: Philippines Will Impound Ship Linked to North Korea
The MV Jin Teng after its arrival at Subic Bay in the Philippines. Philippine officials, believing the ship to be North Korean, have taken steps to impound it.
|
REBUTTAL
BY
Though billed by the warmongers and the Yellow Press as a moral crusade to liberate the almost-neighboring island of Cuba; the true objective of the lop-sided 1898 War with Spain (which had to be imposed upon a reluctant President McKinley) was for the United States to steal the Philippines and Guam from Spain. This marked the beginning of a powerful U.S. (Globalist) presence in the Asian Pacific. Thanks to President Teddy Roosevelt's subsequent crushing of the rebels and forced conversion of the islands to English speakers, the Philippines has remained a wholly owned U.S. vassal state ever since. That is why today's Filipinos have Spanish surnames but speak the English language.
   1- Neither the Pope, nor the innocent Spaniards, nor the U.S. President was able to beat back
the insane war mania and press propaganda which followed the false-flag destruction in the U.S.S.
Maine in 1898. 2- President McKinley was forced to go along with the warmongers of the U.S. Congress. 3-
On the opening day of the war to "liberate Cuba", Commodore Dewey's Hong Kong-based fleet, on orders from then Navy
Secretary Teddy Roosevelt, crushed the Spaniards at Manila. The theft of the strategically vital Philippines - not the 'liberation'
of Cuba' - was intended to be the real prize all along.
With that mini history lesson out of the way, let us now proceed to decipher the true
meaning of this latest anti-North Korean move by the suddenly belligerent Filipinos. We dissect a few excerpts of this "lie
of omission" propaganda piece: * The Slimes: The will become the first country to enforce tough new United Nations sanctions on North Korea when it begins formal procedures to impound a cargo vessel ... Translation: The United
States / Israel Axis ordered the Phillipines to start messing with North Korea. "Don't worry. We got your back." The Slimes: linked to the reclusive nation... Translation: "reclusive" = "fiercely
independent and totally sovereign" The
Slimes: The vessel is registered and flagged under multiple countries, but it is one of 31 listed as
being owned by , Philippine officials said, and therefore subject to seizure under
the new sanctions. Translation: Piracy is legal as long as the U.N. signs off on it.   Secretary of State Frankenkerry and Secretary
of Offense Ass Carter meet with their Filipino puppet counterparts. The U.S. has been building up the Philippines' military
in recent years. The Phillipines in orange, North Korea in green. The Slimes: The sanctions are a result of a United Nations
Security Council resolution that was passed Wednesday ..... Translation: As was the case with Libya, Council members Russia and China are still so afraid of the U.S. that they went along
with the sanctions -- in the hopes the Globalists will leave them alone. On its face, this is disappointing. However, the
good news is that there is concern over whether or not China (North Korea's main trading partner) will actually enforce
the sanctions, given that member state compliance is only voluntary. The Slimes: ... after a North Korean nuclear test on Jan. 6 and a
long-range rocket test on Feb.
7. Analysis: You
see, the U.S. and Israel can test missiles and bomb civilians at will. But when North Korea, which is under constant threat
by the U.S. and its South Korean vassal, decides to test its systems, it's a big no-no.
Israeli white phosphorous bombing of Palestinian civilians -- No problem. North Korean missile fired at nothing and no one -- SANCTIONS! The Slimes: One component of the new sanctions requires countries to inspect all cargo passing through their territory en route to or from North Korea. Inspections previously had been required only if there was reasonable suspicion of contraband aboard. Analysis: This outrageous baiting is an act of war against North Korea, plain and simple. The Globalists want North Korea to use force to protect their shipping. The Slimes: “The world is concerned over North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, and as a member of the U.N., the Philippines has to do its part to enforce the sanctions,” Manuel L. Quezon III, a member of the president’s communications team, said on a government-run radio station on Saturday. Translation: "The U.S. wants us to pick a fight with North Korea. As long as Uncle Sam keeps paying us, we will do as he says." The Slimes: In 2008, the police seized about
1,500 pounds of crystal methamphetamine, with an estimated value of more than $100 million, in Subic Bay that drug enforcement
officials at the time said had been produced in North Korea. Rebuttal: Kim Jong Un is dealing crystal meth now???!!!
"Yo Dennis. I got some good stuff -- Korean style! We need your basketball connections to move crystal meth for us in Detroit and Chicago. We can split the profits 50-50, yo." *
"Crystal meth --- that's a good one!"
*
Like Poland to Germany in 1939; and Kuwait to Iraq in 1991; and Ukraine to Russia in 2014-2016; and Vietnam to China in 2015-2016, the Philippines is playing a very dangerous game of get-paid-to-provoke on behalf of its western paymasters. That's what this vessel impounding nonsense is truly all about. And of course, as always, the seditious scribblers at Sulzberger's Slimes bloody damn well know it.
. Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in today's New York Times
that the Philippines impounded a North Korean owned vessel. Apparently that Kim fellow is smuggling crystal meth now. Boobus
Americanus
2: Good for our Filipino
allies! That chubby lunatic in North Korea has got to be dealt with sooner or later. My understanding is that he wants to
nuke Los Angeles. * "Yeah, right --- and fifteen yearss ago "your undersstanding"
wass that Ssaddan Hussssein was linked to the attackss of 9/11! -- You frickin newsspaper-worsshipping TV-addicted cretin!" (Sugar, you better add Hussein to your no-say list, along with Soros, ISIS, and General
Sisi of Egypt. All those S's just doesn't work for you.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
MONDAY / MARCH 7, 2016 |
NY Times: An All-American Family Portrait, in White
By
|
REBUTTAL
BY
The Ku Klux Klan continues its oh-so-sudden and stunning 21st Century rebirth by garnering yet another mention in Sulzberger's Slimes, aka "The Paper of Record". This time, an actual image of the white-hooded phantoms is paired along with the heart-wrenching article. The propaganda piece features a Mexican-Texan artist named Vincent Valdez. Lawrence Downes, the pink-pantied libtard editorialist who inked this crap, describes the horrible specter he witnessed in San Antonio: "In a renovated firehouse near downtown San Antonio, the other day. I stopped dead, my eyes widened, my mouth made a silent O. I was looking at
his latest painting, an unfinished oil on canvas that has already reached a monumental scale: over 6 feet high and 30 feet
long, in four panels along two walls. But it wasn’t the painting’s size that made me stare and stare. It was
the people in it, staring back." We still haven't stopped the "beheaders" of ISIS yet;
now we have to worry about the KKK?    Be afraid, sista. Be very afraid! More vomit: There are about 10 of
them, wearing white, clustered as if for a group photo, which it seems you have just interrupted. They might be a family,
but there is no way to tell. All you can see are their hands, and their eyes through the holes in their hoods." Oh the
bloody flippin' drama! It's a painting for goodness sake! He continues: "One holds a beer, one holds a baby, one checks his iPhone. One, with a woman’s hands, whispers to another. It is after dark. Dust swirls in the glowing headlights of a Chevy pickup, the main source of light other than a pinhole moon and the nighttime grid of a city in the distance. This painting — “The City” — places us on a bluff, somewhere in the present-day United States, in the company of the Klan." Oh horrors! It gets even goofier. "Mr. Valdez was not planning to be prophetic when he began the painting last November. ... He could not have known how much the Ku Klux Klan, and white supremacy, would overtake the 2016 presidential campaign."
* Were it not for the deadly seriousness of the imaginary KKK's recent "revival", this would all be quite humorous. But the deliberate incitement of the Black and Hispanic elements of America is no laughing matter. The domestic terror group 'Black Lives Matter' and its sympathizers have already burned and looted businesses; and assaulted and murdered random White people. This latest incarnation of the KKK (Kosher Kabbalah Klan) - if it continues to "grow" - will only make matters worse as we approach the summer political season of the 2016 QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show).
  Stirred up by the Zionist-Marxist
media and Team Obongo, Black radicals showed up to abuse Whites at St. Loius Rams football games and Baltimore Orioles baseball
games.
And
still, this article gets worse: "Since the night I first saw it, the image has haunted me, along with the thought that Mr. Valdez has captured, in a single composition, a selfie for 21st-century America. The grisaille painting is poetic realism, a fiction that tells the truth about the country today. It’s a country obsessed with borders and boundaries, full of people who are comfortable but uneasy, clannish but frightened. People who are unaware, even in their robes, how ridiculous and terrifying they appear. Or who do not care. ---- --- The painting
leaves a lot of room for interpretation, he (Valdez) said. “You get to decide what they’re plotting.” In resurrecting
the KKK for the 21st Century, the Jew York Slimes is following the play-book of Marxist strategist and trickster Saul Alinsky (cough cough). Indeed,
the trouble-making Chicago Red, whose twisted ideas influenced both Killary Clinton and the White House firm of Mr. &
Mr. Obongo, once planned a 'KKK' demonstration which consisted of Marxist activists dressed up as Klansmen in "support"
of a politician that they were actually opposed to! (here) That's what is going now, and the seditious scribblers at Sulzberger's Slimes bloody damn well know it.
Unfortunately, we expect this "resurgent" Klan problem to only get worse, and possibly more violent, in months to
come -- especially if the Donald Trump Express continues to roll.
Trump rallies are getting more and more dangerous. As the media brings the fake KKK back from the graveyard of history, the filthy and ignorant rabble of America's underclass will become even more prone to violence.
. Boobus
Americanus
1: A
Mexican-American artist was featured in today's New York Times. His haunting painting of a group of Ku Klux Klan members is
utterly chilling. Boobus
Americanus
2:
It is tragic that the KKK has been able to make such a comeback in 2016. I suspect
that the Trump campaign re-energized them out of their dormant state. * "Hey idiot boy! It wass not Trump who brought thiss fake KKK back from
the dead! It wass the @#$(*& *%$#! at Ssulzberger'ss shitty Sslimess" (Perhaps not the most eloquent way of putting it -- yet true nonetheless.)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
FRIDAY / MARCH 4, 2016 |
NY Times: A Fiery Debate on the K.K.K. in 2016. Who Figured?
|
REBUTTAL
BY
On 'Super Tuesday', two TV talking heads argued about the Ku Klux Klan on CNN. The "conservative", Jeffrey Lord, argued correctly that this recent resurrection of the KKK bogeyman has to do with race-baiting to stop Donald Trump -- while the Black "liberal", Van Jones, an actual admitted communist, (here) insisted that there are still "racists" TM hiding under every rock. Although Lord, a typical milk-toast "conservative", made some valid points and did so with spirit; he missed the golden opportunity to crush his evil adversary by not saying what should have been said -- something like: "Who the hell are you, as an admitted communist who helped to incite the deadly Los Angeles race riot of 1992, to denounce the dangers of the virtually non-existent KKK of 2016? Do you denounce communism?" A strong comeback like that would have dealt a knockout blow. Unfortunately, milk-toast "conservatives" don't like to fight. And of course, this Slimes article also neglects to mention Jones' communism.
Van Jones is a communist who openly supported the deadly 1992 Los Angeles race riots! Jones: "I met all these young radical people of color - I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, 'This is what I need to be a part of.'...I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary.... I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th. By August, I was a communist."
Let's dive into topropaganda piece, extract a few excerpts, and rebut
them. Hazmat suits on -- into Sulzberger's cesspool we go! *
Until this
week, the KKK’s loathsomeness had seemed to be a settled issue. Rebuttal: A national meeting of today's KKK probably couldn't fill up a library conference room. The issue of "the KKK’s loathsomeness" is therefore almost as irrelevant as talking about the excesses of ancient Rome's Praetorian Guards. What a joke! But just to set the record straight, the KKK was originally established in 1865, not long after the War Between the States had ended in total defeat for the South. The Klan was a necessary self-defense force formed to protect southern women from the Black rapists who were running wild, and also to resist the brutal political oppression of the Northern "carpetbaggers" who had poured into the defeated and Yankee-occupied South for the purpose of legally looting it.
1- Respected Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest was an early member of the KKK. 2- The 1915 classic silent film, 'Birth of a Nation', presented the KKK as the heroic defenders of southern women. 3- After a private White House viewing, former Princeton professor and liberal hero, President Woodrow Wilson praised the film and declared: "It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true."
The conversation moved, perhaps inevitably, to Mr. Trump’s interview on Sunday with CNN’s Jake Tapper, in which he did not immediately denounce David Duke, the former Klan leader who supports him. Rebuttal:
Again, just to set the record straight, it should be noted that "former-Klan-leader-David-Duke" was also
a former State Legislator; and "former-Klan-leader-David-Duke" is also an accomplished author; and "former-Klan-leader-David-Duke"
is also a Phd. historian. Let's give "former-Klan-leader-David-Duke" (as in 40 years ago!)
a break! Jeffrey Lord, a former Reagan staffer, defended Mr. Trump — arguing that the Republicans criticizing him were patronizing African-Americans. “I hate to say this about the Republican establishment,” Mr. Lord said, “but their view of civil rights is to tip the black waiter five bucks at the country club.” Rebuttal: That coming from a "conservative" who is supposedly condemning race-baiting! Here’s where things got real. Van Jones, a former Obama staffer (and an African-American), turned to Mr. Lord and argued that Mr. Trump was “playing funny with the Klan” by not deploring them with the same passion he directs at other terrorist organizations. Rebuttal: The difference in Trump's response is due to the fact that terrorist organizations (though controlled by CIA-Mossad) are real, are growing, and are killing real people (as well as fake people). The KKK, on the other hand, is today as tiny as it is toothless. Understood,
We know that the ISIS "beheadings" are fake and that the ISIS fighters are controlled. But let us pretend, for argument's sake, that ISIS really is what the media presents it to be. How could one possibly draw an equivalence between the two groups depicted above?
Mr. Lord responded that Mr. Trump had said enough, that Democrats were “dividing people by race” and besides, the Klan was a “leftist” terror group. Rebuttal: Good Lord, Mr. Lord! The anti-communist Christian Klan was "leftist"??? Really? That's the best you can come up with? Communist filth like Jones needs his head bashed in, and all milk-toast "conservative" Lord can muster is to make the ridiculous claim that the Klan was "leftist" -- a softball which a skilled polemicist like Jones will hit out of the park every time. Again: This is 2016. And here was a white panelist suggesting that his African-American peer should really go back and learn his history before criticizing someone about the Klan. Mr. Jones, calmly but with clear emotion, dressed Mr. Lord down: “We’re not going to play that game,” he said. Rebuttal: The only thing that would have stopped a communist like Jones would have been to quote his admission to being a communist and demanding that he renounce the communist genocides of the 20th century. By refusing to counter-attack the vulnerable red demon with truth and manly firmness, the de-balled Lord put himself at a disadvantage. Jones devoured him. It was five minutes or so of the most stunning TV of the year. Even the body language was fascinating: Mr. Jones rested a hand on Mr. Lord’s shoulder at times, seemingly less as a dominating gesture than to keep the situation from spiraling out of control. Rebuttal: Bull-Shine! Resting a hand on someone's shoulder during a heated debate is a pure attempt at domination and intimidation. Milk toast Lord should have grabbed his hand, removed it, and said something like, "Get your hand off me, you communist!"
"Get your frickin' finger out of my face before I bite it, you damn dirty, race-baiting, self-admitted communissst jail-bird!" That's how Sugar would have handled Jones.
I know you,” Mr. Jones said at one point. “I trust you.” It was as if he were simultaneously battling Mr. Lord and trying to defuse a highly unstable bomb. Rebuttal: Milk toast Lord not only allowed communist Jones to assert physical dominance over him, but actually allowed Jones to make himself seem reasonable as he was doing so. Cable debates typically end up with two parties yelling over trivia. The Jones-Lord argument was arresting precisely the opposite way: Two men were arguing, furiously but in control, over something dead serious. Rebuttal: Lord held his own at times, but arguing with communist demons without calling them out as such, is exactly why communists keep winning. Being "in control" doesn't mean one has to hold back on the truth. The 2016 election has dug up ghastly things in American politics that many of us thought were long buried. But once the Klan robe is out of mothballs, it needs to be confronted under bright lights. Rebuttal: Even if all the horror stories about the KKK were true, the group would still pale in comparion to "the ghastly things" that communists, both foreign and domestic, have done over the past 150 years. Why are those dirty deeds never confronted under bright lights", eh In a way, the argument was the 2016 election in miniature. It defied the political alignments
we’ve become used to. Mr. Jones, after all, was a progressive supporting an argument begun by a conservative fellow
panelist. Rebuttal: Jones is not a "progressive".
Well meaning libtards may be described with that stupid term; but not full-blown, self-admitted communist subversives. It unearthed ancient, ugly things in our collective history. It
was arresting, in part because it seemed it could all go terribly wrong. Rebuttal:
Any "debate" about the "threat" of the KKK is already "terribly wrong", and terribly
stupid. This probably won’t be the last time this election that the limits of cable discussion — like the limits of our political system — get tested. Rebuttal: Yes , it won't be the last time. That's because communists like CNN's Jones and the Yellow Journalistic scum at Sulzberger's Slimes will never stop with the damn race-baiting. The sad fact that White milk-toast "conservatives" are too afraid to fight fire with fire compounds the problem. * ***
Boobus
Americanus
1: Did you see
that debate on CNN between Van Jones and Jeffrey Lord? It was really intense. Boobus
Americanus
2: Yes. Intense, yet respectful. It's
important for society to have open conversations about race. * "I got your frickin' 'converssation about race' right here Boobus! ---
White Cat Power! Hee hee hee hee." (Dammit!
Sugar! That's not what we are about!)
COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |
|
THURSDAY / MARCH 3, 2016 |
NY Times: The Party of Trump, and the Path Forward for Democrats
|
REBUTTAL BY
The first thing
to catch our eye about this latest bit of disgusting and deceitful hate-journalism from that miserable little-man-behind-the-curtain
Andrew Rosenthal, aka "The Editorial Board", was the graphic of a gray check-mark that appears
to look like falling Twin Towers. These psychos have a long history of throwing concealed messages - as well as some not-so-concealed
messages, in our faces. They evidently must derive some perverse sort of psycho-sexual thrill from doing so. Note the similarity
between the image and the towers.    Coincidence? Or Sulzberger's seditious
Slimes teasing us again? As for Rosenscum's nasty editorial, it adds further evidence to the already indisputable truth that
the Globo-Zionist PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) is
in full panic mode over the rising popularity of the imperfect (from
our view) Donald Trump. Let us review the libelous
litany of hateful adjectives and outright lies: * Paragraph 2: "shady, bombastic liar" -- "symbol of intolerance and division" Paragraph 3: "the likes of him" -- "targeting
religious and racial minorities" -- "flirts with white supremacists
and the Ku Klux Klan" -- "ridicules and slanders" Paragraph 4: "anger-filled message" Paragraph 5: "months of games" (played
by Trump) Paragraph 6: "darker elements
within the Republican Party" Paragraph 7: "exclusion,
bigotry and character assassination" -- "his tactics" (negative sense) Paragraph
8: "record of falsehoods and business failures" -- "scam
that is Trump University" Paragraph 9:
"the worst of political impulses" Paragraph 10: "foul statements" -- "shallow ideas" Paragraph 11: "politics of rage" * Wow! "Anger-filled message?" -- Projecting again, Mr. Rosenfeces?
"Record of business failures?" Really Rosenstink? The 121st richest man* (here), in the richest country in the world, is a "failure" at business? * Trump maintains that he ranks in the top 50.   A classic psycho-narcissist -- the little man
behind the curtain is full of the red-hot hatred which he accuses Trump of having. Sulzberger and Rosenstool's unhinged
hatred for Trump, and the people who are supporting him, is every bit as deep as that of their cross-town competitor / co-conspirator
-- The New York Daily News of Mort Zuckerman (cough cough). The only difference
between the two newspapers is their respective target audiences -- with the broadsheet-format Slimes being written for the
"educated" (ha ha!) and the tabloid-format Daily News for the "uneducated". The Daily
News just acts crazier, but make no mistake -- the Yellow Journalists at The Slimes are just as vile and just as radical --
albeit much more reserved in their presentation.       The "serious" Jew York Slimes and
the "outrageous" Jew York Daily News work in tandem -- spreading the very same lies to different classes of readers.
Boobus
Americanus
1:
The New York Times Editorial Page really ripped Donald Trump to shreds
today. And they did it with tact and
gravitas. Boobus
Americanus
2: I
have always appreciated the respectable manner in which The Times makes its points -- unlike the low-brow New York Daily News
with its sensationalist front page headlines. ***
"Idiot! It'ss the exact ssame bull-#^@
brought to you by memeberss of the ssame tribe, but wrapped up in a different package -- that'ss all!" (The sophist Boobuses are too superficial to understand
the complementing dynamic between the two papers.) COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS
greattomatobubble2@gmail.com |