JMI
September 4th, 2007, 13:05
_wh_:
Since you still don't "get it" I'll explain it to you "again."
First, you did "NOT" "just point out that some person just posted the same question." You could have done that by simply stating: "someone just posted the same question on the OpenRCE Forum," but, instead, you posted a link to a specific Thread which beaner could have easily found by doing a search for "unpacking WinLicense."
And, of course, he hadn't done ANY searching and you gave him a "link" to a thread with "information" on the subject
HE should have found with his own searching. It wasn't the "question" you were directing him to, but the "information" posted in that Thread about his subject HE should have found himself!
As for your own Post at http://www.woodmann.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10217&highlight=syncrosoft the issue is, again, that you simply did not "show any effort"
at answering your own question. That "effort" is required by our Rules, clearly outlined in the FAQ and you were reminded of that responsibility BECAUSE
you had not done so, and particularily because you had posted in the "Advanced Forum." I gave you a search criteria and advised you to "search" and read what you found, because I did that BEFORE I posted my response. Among the things which I found was a tutorial on the subject related to Cubase, which you should have already read and perhaps mentioned.
And, of course, your first post mentioned NOTHING about your having been "very impressed after [you] had a look at the SDK and manuals." The ONLY thing you stated was: "has anybody experience with this technology."
So you might as well skip "the lameass excuses" and "self-justifications" and complain to your mommy about how the bad man reminded you about our Rules.
And anyone who IS interested could have, and still can post their "impressions" of this "protection system" in that thread, if THEY are interested, and one already has.
Regards,