Log in

View Full Version : Unpacking WinLicense


beaner
September 3rd, 2007, 15:00
Are there any unpackers or tutorials for unpacking WinLicense?

I heard WinLicense and TheMida are based off the same stuff and I tried UnTheMide but it doesn't work.

JMI
September 3rd, 2007, 15:37
Obviously, you haven't READ THE FRIGGIN FAQ or what's written under your Signature!

You need to tell US what YOU have done to try to find the answer to YOUR problem.

Is there something actually wrong with YOUR search engine or are you, perhaps, too lazy to do your own searching?

Why don't YOU put something like "unpacking WinLicense" (without the quotes) in YOUR search and YOU do YOUR work!

Regards,

_wh_
September 4th, 2007, 01:53
http://www.openrce.org/forums/posts/584

JMI
September 4th, 2007, 03:49
So _wh_:

Why in the hell did you think YOU should help beaner after I just scolded him for failing to make his own effort to find what he was looking for?? Where you trying to create a favorible impression, because it has had just the "opposite" effect. Now you get to join him on the watch list!

Regards,

_wh_
September 4th, 2007, 05:01
sorry i don't understand why you are so annoyed???

1) i just point out that some person just posted the same question ...
2) this is my third post at this forum, and the second time you react in the same way
http://www.woodmann.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10217&highlight=syncrosoft

I'm sure when i had done 300 post here, somebody had give me a answer on syncrosoft, but you just read that i have 3 posts and think i ask for a "crack".
And i wonder why nobody is intersted in MCFACT it is really a very powerful way of hiding data, and i'm very impressed after i had a look at the SDK and manuals. But there was no way to start a discussion because i'm now on the watch list ...

anyway i try to post the next time according THE FRIGGIN FAQ

JMI
September 4th, 2007, 13:05
_wh_:

Since you still don't "get it" I'll explain it to you "again."

First, you did "NOT" "just point out that some person just posted the same question." You could have done that by simply stating: "someone just posted the same question on the OpenRCE Forum," but, instead, you posted a link to a specific Thread which beaner could have easily found by doing a search for "unpacking WinLicense."

And, of course, he hadn't done ANY searching and you gave him a "link" to a thread with "information" on the subject HE should have found with his own searching. It wasn't the "question" you were directing him to, but the "information" posted in that Thread about his subject HE should have found himself!

As for your own Post at http://www.woodmann.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10217&highlight=syncrosoft the issue is, again, that you simply did not "show any effort" at answering your own question. That "effort" is required by our Rules, clearly outlined in the FAQ and you were reminded of that responsibility BECAUSE you had not done so, and particularily because you had posted in the "Advanced Forum." I gave you a search criteria and advised you to "search" and read what you found, because I did that BEFORE I posted my response. Among the things which I found was a tutorial on the subject related to Cubase, which you should have already read and perhaps mentioned.

And, of course, your first post mentioned NOTHING about your having been "very impressed after [you] had a look at the SDK and manuals." The ONLY thing you stated was: "has anybody experience with this technology."

So you might as well skip "the lameass excuses" and "self-justifications" and complain to your mommy about how the bad man reminded you about our Rules.

And anyone who IS interested could have, and still can post their "impressions" of this "protection system" in that thread, if THEY are interested, and one already has.

Regards,

blurcode
September 4th, 2007, 13:33
I think beaner is mcwanks and propably is also ddgsm ( see http://forums.accessroot.com/?showtopic=6031&hl= ).

JMI
September 4th, 2007, 13:47
I had the same impression.

Regards,

blurcode
September 4th, 2007, 19:09
If so what he/she needs is LY2140023 .

bye

test123
September 4th, 2007, 19:39
Quote:
[Originally Posted by JMI;68333]... I just scolded ...


Talk about ego..Wow.

This is my first and my last post.

JMI
September 4th, 2007, 22:01
Hey blurcode:

Apparently test123 could use some of that LY2140023. After he posted he's been back to lurk around, "checking his masterwork" and, apparently, forgetting he said it would be his last.

Regards,

TiGa
September 4th, 2007, 23:09
This is all part of that number 23 conspiracy.

Is it a coincidence that both "test123" and "LY2140023" end with the number 23?
Quote:
[Originally Posted by "test123"]
Quote:

Originally Posted by JMI


"Originally posted by JMI" is 24 characters long, if you remove the total number of posts by test123 (1), you get 23 again.

Test123 has used the letter W in his message, which just happens to be the 23rd letter of the alphabet.

Today is 09-05-2007, add the numbers and you get 23.
Before the quote, this message is exactly 23 words long.
This is my 23rd post.

It is all starting to make sense now.
TiGa

LLXX
September 5th, 2007, 01:01
Quote:
Why in the hell did you think YOU should help a beaner
Fixed

_wh_
September 5th, 2007, 02:06
Quote:
So you might as well skip "the lameass excuses" and "self-justifications" and complain to your mommy about how the bad man reminded you about our Rules.


ok i will, i'm sorry for the trouble


http://img502.imageshack.us/my.php?image=bartsimpsongeneratorphplf8.gif

JMI
September 5th, 2007, 03:02
Well at least you finally posted something "useful."

Regards,

beaner
September 5th, 2007, 09:00
wow chill out kids.

_wh_ was just trying to help me (and i thank you very much _wh_). god forbid there's people with good intentions around here.

LLXX
September 5th, 2007, 21:56
If by "help" you mean "encourage to turn into a brainless leech with no ability to think", you are absolutely correct

AgentData
October 7th, 2007, 10:42
Quote:
[Originally Posted by _wh_;68337]And i wonder why nobody is intersted in MCFACT it is really a very powerful way of hiding data, and i'm very impressed after i had a look at the SDK and manuals. But there was no way to start a discussion because i'm now on the watch list ...

anyway i try to post the next time according THE FRIGGIN FAQ


Do you really have the MCFACT SDK and manuals ? I mean the real thing, not the advertising crap you can download from syncroso*ts website... !

If you really want to start a discussion feel free to drop me a line.
And yes you are right, MCFACT is really very impressive and for me its the best protection scheme i've ever seen.