JMI
October 19th, 2007, 05:27
I realize it's early in the morning back there, but not even a good effort!
I do not take "offense" when someone fails to follow the Rules here, I simply attempt to remind them we do have them. You've clearly been here long enough to have noticed the BIG RED LETTERS and I always find it "interesting" when I remind someone they should do their own research, when they suddenly remember that they did some, and just "somehow" failed to mention this "alleged" fact in their original post. Also, I was watching you idleing on the post for some time before completing your Reply, leading to the "reasonable conclusion" that was actually the point in time you did your "research."
Again, you establish no "raison d'être" for your question because you still have no "rational" basis to determine whether any answer you may receive is valid or not,
unless the one who makes the claim provides sufficient "proof."
Again, your statement that you:
"suppose if someone is willing to steal, they would be capable of lying also. But I would not want to call a thief a liar (they might get offended)"
is, again, either evidence of disingenuousness or incredible naiveite.
First, one neither has to be a "thief" or a "liar" in order to reverse engineer a protection. One could always actually purchase the system to attempt to determine how it works and reverse it's protection. This might bring them in conflict with the manufacture's terms and conditions of use agreement, but they aren't a "thief" simply for figuring out how a protection system works.
And if you are willing to brand someone a "thief" if they might reverse their own purchase, why are you only concerned they might "get offended' if you
also call them a "liar"?
So let's put your mind at rest from your insatiable curiosity. Nothing made by man is "unbreakable," given enough time, energy, talent, and resources. Nothing at all. As a last desperate effort, one could always become the thief you've named them to be and actually break into the facility where they make the damn thing and "literally" steal their tools and code!
But, even if they did that, YOU would still have no way of evaluating the "truth" of any claims they may make about their efforts, without some independent "proof." Thus, your "curiosity" remains more than a little "idle."
Regards,