9skumar
January 15th, 2010, 00:02
Hi everybody. I am a newcomer so this has to be a stupid question. Let me describe it.
Is there a possible way to recover lm_seeds from the enc_seeds1/2/3/4 and prikeys1/2/3 for a target using flex 11.5 with ecc of course?
Before this post i have read a lot of tuts regarding flex and found that only patching is the solution, impossible to recover fully the lic. I have that soln and working perfectly fine with changing it to accept old way of lic and using ENC1/2. But i just want to learn something. Since i have this information overload of having the prikeys, i thought is it possible now.
To my surprise ENC3/4 is not changing anything in the lic. I generated with a arbitrary ENC3/4 and found that SIGN is same SIGN="007E 4F63 E56E 12F8 \
1AEC 4C94 C98D CF00 89DB 2B0B E276 AD73 AA94 F0CF 152D"
as it was with actual enc3/4. The only thing left is to hunt for lmseed.
Please excuse me if still the post is not upto the mark of 3 letter Admin.
Is there a possible way to recover lm_seeds from the enc_seeds1/2/3/4 and prikeys1/2/3 for a target using flex 11.5 with ecc of course?
Before this post i have read a lot of tuts regarding flex and found that only patching is the solution, impossible to recover fully the lic. I have that soln and working perfectly fine with changing it to accept old way of lic and using ENC1/2. But i just want to learn something. Since i have this information overload of having the prikeys, i thought is it possible now.
To my surprise ENC3/4 is not changing anything in the lic. I generated with a arbitrary ENC3/4 and found that SIGN is same SIGN="007E 4F63 E56E 12F8 \
1AEC 4C94 C98D CF00 89DB 2B0B E276 AD73 AA94 F0CF 152D"
as it was with actual enc3/4. The only thing left is to hunt for lmseed.
Please excuse me if still the post is not upto the mark of 3 letter Admin.

The purpose of such posts are to not only remind posters of our requirement that one attempt to help themselves first, but that they also state that they have done so and some of what they have done.
.
Isn't it true that simplicity lies beyond complexity? 
