subj(ru)

2859

always avoid exaggeration in thinking.
like you wrote:
detection by name or signature are fake, because they can be easily fooled.

detection by name or signature are weak, because they can be easily fooled.

You probably do not understand the meaning. Translation is available, but why should we translate ?

Broken protection is fake. This is a fraud, since you pay for nothing

http://s020.radikal.ru/i706/1312/ec/8499338c07d3.jpg (http://radikal.ru/fp/fb5aca251fdb4bb7b069b35ae27157b3)

I understand what you want very well.
I just want to say you: avoid exaggeration in thinking, because it works against you.

for example, lets analyze you last logic:
Broken protection is fake. This is a fraud, since you pay for nothing

1. Broken protection is -- broken protection!! yep!
2. Customer payed for NOT-YET-Broken protection !! THUSLEY is not fraud.

and finally
3. thanks to you, THEY will fix their product, offering customers UPGRADED-NOT-YET-Broken protection.

why are you helping them!?

Hack is another. Meaning in the call model. Filter not working from the outset. Subj methods used in 2008(virustech.org)

Exaggeration is intentional. Purpose - blow to the LK authority for uninitiated users.

"FRIEND! YOU HAVE KIND EYES!"