Log in

View Full Version : Here is the SuperBPM for WinNT

Solomon
September 28th, 2002, 04:36
a Chinese guy wrote this tool.
Solomon
October 2nd, 2002, 15:10
Has anyone reversed it?

It's written with DriverWorks. Seems to hook NtContinue/RtlUnwind etc.
SiNTAX
October 3rd, 2002, 13:39
Euhm stupid question maybe, but what is it supposed to do?!

Had a quick search and found:

---
SuperBPM by EliCZ. 26.V.1999.
SuperBPM (2K).

Sometimes your breakpoints can be (BPM, BPIO -h, G, HERE, P, P RET) ignored. With SuperBPM everything is all super, zuprgut.
---


But I've not had any problems with breakpoints not working on my XP setup.
squidge
October 3rd, 2002, 13:53
From the docs:

Purpose
-------
Sometimes can be Your breakpoints (BPM, BPIO -h, G, HERE, P, P RET) ignored.
With SuperBPM is all super, zuprgut.
(This is basic version. The full version will be released after I feel it's
needed.)
Test
----
- Run SuperBPM, enable Erase.
- Load CodeSafe.exe (v3.1, size 546304) into NuMega SoftICE, G 4168E0
- Load CodeSafe into LiuTaoTao's TRW, BPM 4168E0 X, G
^DAEMON^
October 4th, 2002, 14:43
hmmm the question is : WHO needs that ?
latest sice recovers breakpoints on it's own
Solomon
October 5th, 2002, 09:19
Really? I will check it.
Did ECliZ release SuperBPM for WinNT/2K a long time ago? Sorry I don't know.

Quote:
Originally posted by ^DAEMON^
hmmm the question is : WHO needs that ?
latest sice recovers breakpoints on it's own
evaluator
October 5th, 2002, 17:09
DAEMON!

>>latest sice recovers breakpoints on it's own

Hey! this means, it will work as you have ALWAYs loaded SuperBPM!???

So tElock & other like protections will ALWAYS crash under NTICE!?

Or there is some FANTASTIC scheme of recovery???
^DAEMON^
October 5th, 2002, 17:11
no they won't crash...
elicz just informed me that it "recovers" @ least bpm's

(cause he tested it on messbpm)

^DAEMON^
evaluator
October 5th, 2002, 18:16
DAEMON!

You talk strange things!
I already discuss about BPM, not about BPX!
Or you don't know, how works tElock's BPM scheme!?
^DAEMON^
October 7th, 2002, 16:19
heh, evu... calm down... take a look @ messbpm... then come back (telock is more or less using messbpm's "tech"... debug exceptions)

take messbpm and set a BPM ExitProcess X
and run it... u'll see

^DAEMON^
evaluator
October 7th, 2002, 17:19
DEARRRR DAEMON!

1. Run SuperBPM for W9x, turn on flag "ERASE" & then run telocked-exe
Happens: "CRC error!"

2. Run chinese SuperBPM on XP. Then run telocked-exe.
Happens: "CRC error!"

You can contact tE for explanation!!!

>..easy..
>..heh..
^DAEMON^
October 8th, 2002, 15:33
seems u don't know much about exceptions...
debug exceptions can't be emulated neither by superbpm nor by pbpm

these exception HAVE to occour
^DAEMON^
SiNTAX
October 8th, 2002, 15:46
Quote:
Originally posted by ^DAEMON^
seems u don't know much about exceptions...
debug exceptions can't be emulated neither by superbpm nor by pbpm

these exception HAVE to occour
^DAEMON^


EVERYTHING can be emulated
evaluator
October 8th, 2002, 19:39
DAEMON!
Finally you UNDERSTAND me!!!

NOW back to my QUESTION:
>IF latest sice recovers breakpoints on it's own,
SO tElock's scheme will crash or no!?

You need just practically test this on newest NTice.
^DAEMON^
October 9th, 2002, 16:13
heh... well "crash" is not correct...(crc won't be correct) sice cannot handle this...

ds2.7 has just something like pbpm already included...

^DAEMON^