I'm using with "ProcDump32" and "pe-scan" to Unpack files, but sometime i can't Unpack the file that i want.
I know that there are many of methods to Pack/Unpack files, and i cant find good tools to get information about the files.

If someone can help me, I will appreciate your answer.

thanks.

:-

Use PEid v9.1 to find out what packer is used.

SS

Nice tool!!!, thanks...
Is there good tool to Unpack?

Have you by any chance seen those big red letters on the main index page of this board? They actually form "words", which in turn form a "request", or should I say "requirement" for posting on this board...

I just READ THE FAQ, where PEID >>is<< mentioned..

eh..

lol maybe the font size aint big enuf make it 72

I'm sorry, my english is not well, and i'm new with all this.
You're right!, i broke the rules, and i promise to not do that again.

I'm a programer by VB6, and when it started boring, i found the Assembly language that made my to love her,
and this forum is really good and serious from any forum that i saw, and i think here is the right place to learn.

You can try PeId to find what packer is used and have a look on http://www.protools.cjb.net/ (unpackr section) to find the unpacker.

You are very welcome to learn here Dav. The problem is just that you won't learn much from asking for ready-made unpacker tools, and that is what we object to.

Hey!

I have good idea!
Because zillion time newbies incorrectly think, that unpk-forum is about unpacking tools,
lets write in forums Title: "this is not about unpacking tools, but manual-unpacking etc.."

good?

Since most of the people who come here only looking for tools, don't even read the large red letters saying they should read the FAQ and Search, why would one think they would read a statement in the title of the Forum which said it was about "manual unpacking, not unpacking tools"?

Regards,

pleaseplease

JMI, I agree. However, one begins to wonder how these users found this site in the first place. Perhaps they stumbled upon a link which lead them more directly to a specific forum area. In that case they would be less likely to notice the text because it only exists on the main page. I know it's a lot of work but possibly the text should be added to every page (it's just a template isnt it?).

-nt20

Hmm I think I have mention this sometime ago but I'm not sure if this systems is still working.... When registered the forum it will send an email to the user for activation at the same time with the faq.They should read it before posting anything.


Regards

I still believe that, no matter what we do, a certain percentage of first time posters will not pay attention to anything but their desire for instant gratification of whatever it is that they desire in the form of an immediate solution to THEIR question or THEIR desire.

Regards,

esther: Yes, people have to "agree to" the FAQ before registering, on a web form. Or maybe that was in an old version of the board, hmm, not sure...

nikola: I purposely left out that red text from all pages when I added it to the main index. If people won't read it on the main page they most likely won't read it on the other pages either, and then the intrusiveness of that text in the layout of the pages then makes it undesirable and not worth it I figured.

Yo JMI

I agree with what you say totally

Look at what Dav posted:- Nice tool!!!, thanks...
Is there good tool to Unpack?

I believe that most forum members would not respond to a post like that, we all have to start somewhere but "posters" should at the very least try and show something of what they have achieved in order to get a response

/hobferret

I think a lot of people are drawn hear thinking that someone will "crack" a program for them.

For them to read the FAQs even before they register, they will just assume that its a ploy to keep software companies from trying to shut the site down,
and ignore it, such agreements I have seen that come to mind:

nakedcrew.net <- You must agree to their terms before you enter the site.
cracks.am <- Terms and conditions on the homepage.
Keygen.us <- Terms and conditions on the homepage.

If anyone wold read the forum a little before posting I am sure they will see reference to someone b*tching at someone else to read the FAQ...

Peace,

>I think a lot of people are drawn hear thinking that someone will "crack" a program for them.

No doubt. But we need to set them straight about that else this forum would be a completely crappy crack site with no attraction whatsoever to knowledgable reversers/programmers.

>For them to read the FAQs even before they register, they will just assume that its a ploy to keep software companies from trying to shut the site down,
and ignore it

Agree. Hell who DOES read faq's ? I do if I'm researching a new field/subject and they have a good faq, but if it smells like a disclaimer, no way. Maybe we shouldn't call it a FAQ, maybe there's a better word. POSTING RULES would likely be just as ignored.

It's just a simple matter of following a few common sense posting strategies. These people, whether they read the faq or not or just ignore what it says (plus we have to remember any language difficulties), are only hurting themselves. It seems to me that with a modicum of effort more they could probably get the answer they seek without being 'bitched' at.

K.

I agree with Kayaker, but I also think that there are enough members of this forum, that surely The FAQs could be easily translated into many languages.