View Full Version : Unpacker Detection
Corpus
April 25th, 2004, 10:57
Hi,
I have an application that I want to unpack cause if I open it with IDA I see a lot of "rubbish". Anyway, I was wondering how I can know with which packer a certain program is packed? Are there any tools to detect this? I am trying to use procdump to unpack but when I choose unknown as unpacker it gives me an error message: Process isn't 32 bit or is already finished...
thanks,
Corpus
llAmElliK
April 25th, 2004, 12:50
In my opinion isn't Proc-dumper pick if don't know concrete compressor,find him by the help of Pe-Scan and then use unpacker,that is programme compression-after-mostly then you needn't edit PE header (isn't as a rule)
*RemedY*
April 26th, 2004, 11:03
There are certain tools you can use to detect with which packer a program is packed with. For instance there are PEID or Language2000.. Try to google for "unpackers" and you will quickly come across a detector for packers like the two mentioned above.
Greets *RemedY*
llAmElliK
April 26th, 2004, 11:56
Yes, subscribe and Language 2000 advise!

JMI
April 26th, 2004, 20:36
Although I've looked, I've not seen anything to suggest that Language 2000 has been updated since the year 2000. Assuming my research is correct, one of the other identifiers would probably be more up to date.
Regards,
EJ12N
April 26th, 2004, 23:20

PEiD all the way
llAmElliK
April 27th, 2004, 00:49
These tool them to a flabby much (LordPE),but for beginner get past such,which him exclude from quantity "down-the-line"information.
Btw Peid ,yes good.

Corpus
April 27th, 2004, 04:33
Thanks for the quick replies,
I am gonna check out that PeId tool u guys suggested.
dev_zero
April 30th, 2004, 05:11
You can use file analyzer to find out which packer det exe-file is packed with. Or in some other case the compiler..

llAmElliK
April 30th, 2004, 16:03
have some CME in which are neither described pe header (are two),is it scram and in the same way me nothing no-show wherewith.What about it?What advise tool (after-touch,that you classical fail).
ThX **llAmElliK**
dELTA
May 1st, 2004, 07:50
Wtf, seems like eval has quite the worthy opponent here...

Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2018 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.