I don't know if any of you have heard of it, but Eastern religions call it Chi, Ki, and western nations call it Psi, I have studied it in many away and realize that it is true, Chi is energy, physical electrical and mental, I don't know if any of you people have read about it or not, but thought that since no posts have been recently made abou tit, I might be the first one to introduce it.

Never liked any of those; prefer EMF. I dowse, I know it's there. It's like gravity, we haven't explained it yet.

quote:Originally posted by Dr Kamme:

Never liked any of those; prefer EMF. I dowse, I know it's there. It's like gravity, we haven't explained it yet. Salut, Docteur Came http://www.totse.com/bbs/wink.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/wink.gif)

Well why the distinction. Maybe the nature of the NRG is variable according to the colour of the glass, like a beverage. In the west, in the east, in the middle, the far east, the south, the North, the NRG is of a different taste. According to the ladder that leads to it. The people that aggregate it. Etc...

quote:It's like gravity, we haven't explained it yet.[/B]

I think Newton and Kepler had a couple things figured out about it.

quote:Originally posted by Dark_Magneto:

I think Newton and Kepler had a couple things figured out about it. Revise your math DM. We are in the 21st century, and even most of the 20th had denied newtonian mechanics. We don't know the root reason of any observable law BTW. All we know is, how it behaves and if it can be quantified. Not the reason why.

But of Newtonian system there's more we know: it has been proved wrong by quantics and relativity, more than 50 years ago.

quote:Originally posted by UrbnTbone:

We don't know the root reason of any observable law BTW.

What about the observable Law of the Existence of Chi?

Oh, that's right... there's no such law - because there is no solid evidence to suggest such a thing.

I will come out of retirement to inform this sad rabble that I am set to begin private Tai Chi instruction soon.

quote:Originally posted by Craftian:

What about the observable Law of the Existence of Chi?

Oh, that's right... there's no such law - because there is no solid evidence to suggest such a thing.

Yeah, that's This darkmagnet/blackhole stand: kind of "if you can't quantify it in a lab, it can't exist"...

That reminds me of some middle-ages mentality, backed by the inquisition and burning any alternative worldview...

Just that this time, pseudo-"science" is the church and people with a bit of imagination or solid experience, are doomed fantaisists, just because the new religion's labs cannot find clues about natural forces like Chi. Kind of: "If you could measure Chi power on a Geiger counter it would exist; since you can't measure Chi with a machine, evidence is, it doesn't exist" Kind of sounds like some old papal decree of the 1492 years... "The holy office will prosecute any trespasser: one is not entitled to meditate the spirit outside church dogma." You just replace "spirit" by "reality" and "church dogma" with "pseudo-scientific dogma". Other times, other topic, same attitude.

Thus, since the church of the science (labs and observation machines), can't grasp the Chi, of course the only conclusion they can come to in their dark age folly, is: it doesn't exist.

*condescendant smile*