Log in

View Full Version : The only arguament for after death with Proof I've heard of


Siatek
2003-09-20, 22:16
This idea came to me while High the other day(Strange how such things happen) And the more I think about it, the more certain I am about it-

We dont die, We blink.

A few things should be considered here-

Ok- Time is (By our laws) Eternal, It doesn't stop, this means that one day, everything will happen, because if it doesn't happen today, It'll happen tomorrow.

Now, Apply this to death-

Jason dies

10000 Years into the future, for some reason-Civilisation is advanced enough to reanimate humans.

Jason is Reanimated

Jason wakes up- Now, when we sleep, we have no memory of sleeping except perhaps dreams- Now, if this is the same with death, Jason would die- Then (as his brain would not recognise time had passed) Wake up, Of course, Jason has a 1 in perhaps a Trillion Trillion Trillion chances of being the one reanimated, But eventually, he will be... Then he dies again, and is re-animated again... I cant stand that thought but then- What am I going to do? Destroy every atom in my body (I'm assuming that one day, they will be able to reanimate you from a single atom)

Syko
2003-09-20, 22:39
There is proof that our minds can at least leave our body's, well at least our perceptual censors. If you don't believe in remote viweing, research the unclassified, non conspiracy stargate programme that was run by the cia.

Therefore proof that we are more then the some of our physical parts and the mind can leave the body. Knowing this it's logical to assume that when we die, we will be able to leave our body or not exist. There is also the proof in the fact that we decay that we cannot be reanimated. Unless dna can be stored and recreated with such precision that there is no loss of information.

Dreamwalking also shows that we can slip through time, therefore I figure eternity isn't as long as we assume. Eternity in an existance without time is shorter then a day with time. Assuming we don't have another censor.

Reanimation isn't plausible.

Aphelion Corona
2003-09-21, 22:46
I really can't see people being re-animated from a single atom. A single strand of DNA easy, but that atom would have to have a memory of who its billions of atom friends were millions of years ago, and so far, no-one has proved that atoms have memories.

The Kabbalists believe the following: The first letter of the Torah is a "B", in Hebrew letters are also numbers and Bet, or "B" is two. As if to say God created this world and the 2nd world, the world to come.

Armed&Angry
2003-09-22, 01:27
Why would anybody bother reanimating Jason, if he's been dead for thousands of years?

Anyway, for more of this sort of thing, you might look into Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theory. I believe it's been conclusively disproven, but it's still quite interesting to ponder.

Doofus
2003-09-22, 20:45
Nope, we're all going to die for good. The End.

SweetTea
2003-09-23, 21:19
quote:Originally posted by Doofus:

Nope, we're all going to die for good. The End.

That's no fun.

Dark_Magneto
2003-09-24, 01:14
Yeah, well, neither is tooth decay or the clap.

The universe is not here for our convienence. we just happen to be a side-effect from it that leeches off of it's limited resources.