ive heard a lot of different peoples ideas as to what an angel would look like. i personally recon they would be human in body shape but with white reptillian skin. around two stories high and have large heads with featureless faces (no mouth or nose) just black reflective eyes. also they would have huge feathered white or black wings.... jus my idea

quote:Originally posted by inhale_me:

ive heard a lot of different peoples ideas as to what an angel would look like. i personally recon they would be human in body shape but with white reptillian skin. around two stories high and have large heads with featureless faces (no mouth or nose) just black reflective eyes. also they would have huge feathered white or black wings.... jus my idea

There are lots of different types of angels. Hence the whole branch of "angelology". For example a "seraph" would have 3 pairs of wings.

From highest rank to lowest rank:

Seraph (plural Seraphim):

Seraphim have 6 wings, 4 heads and are immolated in blinding white flames.

Cherub (plural Cherubim):

Cherbim have 4 wings, 1 head, but 4 faces. They possess animal bodies, while their faces are human.

Throne (plural Thrones):

Thrones have a flame body, with four wings protuding from the it, and lightning flickers off them. While they only have one head and one face, their bodies are covered with eyes.

Domination (plural Dominations):

Dominations are somewhat more like our idea of angels - two wings and humanoid, but they are still fearsome to behold.

Virtue (plural Virtues):

Virtues are described as having a blinding aura, but follow the basic two-winged, humanoid pattern.

Power (plural Powers):

Two-winged, humanoid.

Principality (plural Principalities):

Two-winged, humanoid.

Archangel (plural Archangels):

Two-winged, humanoid.

Angel (plural Angels):

Two-winged, humanoid.

Does that help?

I aint never seen one, but I bet the females are hot as hell.

Cool info Vampireslaya

[This message has been edited by ---Beany--- (edited 04-07-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by inhale_me:

i personally recon they would be human in body shape but with white reptillian skin. around two stories high and have large heads with featureless faces (no mouth or nose) just black reflective eyes. also they would have huge feathered white or black wings.... jus my idea

Why do so many people make pointless shit up?

I think an angel would look like my dick. jus my idea

(it's only one story tall, though)

[This message has been edited by Craftian (edited 04-07-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by inhale_me:

ive heard a lot of different peoples ideas as to what an angel would look like. i personally recon they would be human in body shape but with white reptillian skin. around two stories high and have large heads with featureless faces (no mouth or nose) just black reflective eyes. also they would have huge feathered white or black wings.... jus my idea

I think the angels would be very, very beutiful creatures. I have this theory about Satan, in which I don't believe he's evil.

His rank of angel which is the Cherubim, was indeed a very beutiful creature. They are the smaller angels, with 4 wings, second in rank and look like cupids. Satan would have been very beutiful, and I believe that knowing this God makes him appear to man only in a deformed animal-looking creature, that walks upright and has black wings.

He makes him appear this way because He doesn't want followers of Satan, to influenced by his beuty. If someone was to see Satan their immediate reaction would be fear, and they would flee.

Angels are not to scale, meaning they have unusually long limbs and figures. Their tall but not as tall as you imagined them, but then again they are angels and could make themselves be as tall as you said.

I think their scleras are the same color as their irises.

There are 8 actual orders of angel, but some say nine, which isn't true. Order of,

Celestial Heirarchy:angels, archangels, principalities, powers, virtues, dominions, thrones, cherubim, and seraphim

The Archangels consist of some angels of the other orders, which means there are only 8 types. Any angel, including those from the higher rank, could be an Archangel.

BTW: LOFL at Crafts messages.

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-07-2004).]

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-07-2004).]

Yeah, you laugh at my messages but you obviously don't get my point.

You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass.

(btw, the Bible says what they look like)

quote:Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures. And this was their appearance; they had the likeness of a man.

And every one had four faces, and every one had four wings.

And their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was like the sole of a calf's foot: and they sparkled like the colour of burnished brass.

And they had the hands of a man under their wings on their four sides; and they four had their faces and their wings.

Their wings were joined one to another; they turned not when they went; they went every one straight forward.

As for the likeness of their faces, they four had the face of a man, and the face of a lion, on the right side: and they four had the face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an eagle.

Thus were their faces: and their wings were stretched upward; two wings of every one were joined one to another, and two covered their bodies.

And they went every one straight forward: whither the spirit was to go, they went; and they turned not when they went.

As for the likeness of the living creatures, their appearance was like burning coals of fire, and like the appearance of lamps: it went up and down among the living creatures; and the fire was bright, and out of the fire went forth lightning.

-- Ezekiel 1:5-13

Here is a list i got off of http://www.rotten.com/library/religion/angels/

Archangels: This is the elite corps of God's murdering army, often charged with Very Important Tasks on His direct orders, like obliterating cities to prevent buggery. Archangels include Michael, Gabriel, Uriel, Raphael and Metatron. Don't ask how these names were determined. It's just the way things are. There is some ambiguity about where the archangels rank in the cosmic scheme, but it seemed like a good idea to put them first (if for no other reason than to avoid being turned into a pillar of salt).

Seraphim: The Catholic Encyclopedia says seraphim "stand before God as ministering servants in the heavenly court," whatever that means. They have six wings, an uncertain number of faces. The archangels are members of the seraphim caste.

Cherubim: The designation cherubim is where the word "cherub" comes from, but these bloodthirsty mutant freaks are anything but adorable. They have four faces, four hands, four wings and cloven hooves for feet. And don't forget the flaming swords!

Thrones: These guys aren't in the Bible. Somebody just made them up... I mean, figured it out. Whatever. Thrones are the keepers of God's Justice, which is apparently a good thing, despite whatever conclusions you may have drawn from your life experiences.

Dominions: These are even less biblical than the thrones, if possible. They are the cosmic bureaucrats, and most likely responsible for your karmic check getting lost in the mail.

Virtues: Supposedly in charge of nature and lending the occasional hand to beleaguered humans.

Powers: These angels are in charge of killing demons, much like Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Principalities: In charge of watching over the welfare of nations. Clearly, the Principality in charge of Iraq has a lot of 'splaining to do.

Angels: Just plain old angels. This includes the so-called guardian angels,

quote:Originally posted by Craftian:

Yeah, you laugh at my messages but you obviously don't get my point.

You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass.(btw, the Bible says what they look like)...

I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false. You didn't have a goddamned point, that's why I didn't get it.

By the way I and everyone else who've read the bible know what they look like, the question at hand was what would an angel look like and I told him as did others. Your posts were unnecessary.

And the bible doesn't even speak much about angels, especially the one I described, he was mentioned maybe less than ten times in the bible.

If you were smart then you would note that I said God does not want them to appear in their natural form, cause they'll persuade man with their beuty. If you knew anything, then you'd know that.

If you knew anything then you'd know that the cherubs weren't the only angel given a monsrous description. But they don't always appear in the same form dumbass.

If you knew anything of about the bible you'd know that the Seraphs were called one of the four holy beasts in the book of revelations. I hate dumbasses, such as yourself, who try to come off to ppl as though they know something when they really dont't.

You would know if you read the book from which you quote, that the seraphs come from the Hebrew word Saraph, which means Fiery Serpent. The angel appeared as feiry serpents as well as the beutiful angels they are. Go eat shit and die Lame Bastard.

Note the way I told this cocksucker off, and still managed to stay on subject. Plz do the same if you feel you must reply.

Can you believe this... Craftian, plz, I could see if it were Ashes or somebody, who might raise a good arguement, but this fool.

The very definition of Cherub, and this time I'm pulling it out of my ass, as you so eloquently put it.- Chubby rosey cheeked angel, often in paintings, or depicted as cupid.

Oh and BTW: The thrones are in the bible- this may not be the exact wording I'm going on memory, or out of my ass again. They are depicted as kneeling before the throne and singing His praises.

39:75: "And thou, O Muhammad seest the angels thronging round the Throne, hymning the praises of their Lord. And they are judged aright. And it is said: Praise be to God, the Lord of the Worlds!"

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-08-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Metalligod:

I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true

quote:I have this theory about Satan, in which I don't believe he's evil.

OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil.

But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass.

quote:I think their scleras are the same color as their irises.

Alright, I think I may have misinterpreted part of your post. You meant "think" as in "seem to recall" rather than "believe", yes? If so, I apologise for overreacting.

But my tearing into the OP still stands.

quote:Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false.

"Cannot be proven false" is nowhere near equivalent to "true".

quote:39:75: "And thou, O Muhammad seest the angels thronging round the Throne, hymning the praises of their Lord. And they are judged aright. And it is said: Praise be to God, the Lord of the Worlds!"

Since when is Muhammad in the Bible?

And I don't see why you interpret that to mean Throne as a kind of angel rather than a place where God sits.

[This message has been edited by Craftian (edited 04-08-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Craftian:

Since when is Muhammad in the Bible?

And I don't see why you interpret that to mean Throne as a kind of angel rather than a place where God sits.

[This message has been edited by Craftian (edited 04-08-2004).]

Ok dumbass, plz tell me when and which part of my post, did I say that, what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth.

It being a theory makes it a possibility of truth. Any dumbass could see that I not only told what I though of Satan's nature, but I also gave, true info on the way angels are said to look.

I offered info about what 'his' fucking order of angels looked like, and then I went on with the theory, that Satan was not evil.

Now bitch for the WWW, show what part I posted that gave false info on how the angels looked. Ignorat piece of shit.

And I never said prove what I said to be true, just prove that it was false, that would then make my words invalid. But I garauntee everything you look up will be consistant to what I've already said.

I interpreted Thrones that way becuase that's the way it's meant. Bitch, if you paid attention then you would notice that it was capitalized. Thus marking it to be a specific name of something, in this case the Throne angels.

If you had a fuckin brain you would have noticed that God said:"notice the angel thronging round the Throne"

The only angels said to throng around the Throne...Hmmm...who were they... oh yeah The Fucking Thrones! Oh, for another piece of knowledge, in the original bible(Hebrew), these angels were also called the Ophanim.

Who by the very meaning of their name and definition, are said to be 'always' clinging to and kneeling in front of the Lords throne.

By you even saying "since when was Muha-blah blah blah. Proves you don't know shit on the subject you've chosen to speak on.

For another piece of knowledge, some Cherubs did have the same colored scleras as their irises, it was often black. These angels some anyway looked like chubby little girls.

You could see them often in Botticelli's paintings.

I don't know why some1 would mistake you for a person, fuckin ill-bred imbecile.

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-09-2004).]

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-09-2004).]

Damn knowledge is just spewing out of me.

More knowledge Craftian, come absorb some of this.

You wanna talk about the bible, eh, the Book of Enoch supports my 'theory' about Satan. However, it does not say that it is he who was kicked out of heaven for the reason that I believe.

Incase you don't already know, Enoch is said to be the missing book of the bible, and is also mentioned in the bible. But since you've read the bible, you already know this, hm? http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-09-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Metalligod:

Ok dumbass, plz tell me when and which part of my post, did I say that

We were talking about angels, rotten.com said somebody made up the type of angel known as Thrones, then you said "nuh-uh, and this passage talking about a chair from the Koran proves they're in the bible"

quote:what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth. It being a theory makes it a possibility of truth.

Ahhhh... so it's true, yet it's also a theory that is only possibly true.

Riiiighhht.

quote:I offered info about what 'his' fucking order of angels looked like, and then I went on with the theory, that Satan was not evil.

You said that he's beautiful but looks ugly. Where did you support your theory about Satan?

quote:Now bitch for the WWW, show what part I posted that gave false info on how the angels looked.

Where did I say that you gave false information on how angels look?

quote:And I never said prove what I said to be true, just prove that it was false, that would then make my words invalid.

FUCKING CHRIST! BURDEN OF FUCKING PROOF.

Prove my blood isn't made of strawberry jam.

quote:Bitch, if you paid attention then you would notice that it was capitalized. Thus marking it to be a specific name of something, in this case the Throne angels.

...or the Throne of the Lord.

quote:If you had a fuckin brain you would have noticed that God said:"notice the angel thronging round the Throne"

Notice the minstrel playing his lute by the throne of the Queen.

Shee-it, monarchs have the power to summon angels?

And capitalisation doesn't mean shit, the Bible will capitalise just about anything.

quote:Oh, for another piece of knowledge, in the original bible(Hebrew), these angels were also called the Ophanim.

Thanks for that little (irrelevant) tidbit.

quote:By you even saying "since when was Muha-blah blah blah. Proves you don't know shit on the subject you've chosen to speak on.

You gave a verse number but no book, AND you said that you gave it off the top of your head so that it couldn't even be looked up.

And I'm supposed to believe you?

quote:For another piece of knowledge, some Cherubs did have the same colored scleras as their irises, it was often black. These angels some anyway looked like chubby little girls.

You could see them often in Botticelli's paintings.

Right, because some painter is an authority on all things spiritual. BACK UP YOUR FUCKING ASSERTATIONS.

quote:Incase you don't already know, Enoch is said to be the missing book of the bible, and is also mentioned in the bible. But since you've read the bible, you already know this, hm?

Where did I say I read the Bible? That shit's boring.

And the Book of Enoch isn't recognized as part of the Bible; there are more than 100 non-canonical texts (http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/index.htm). They're called the Apocrypha for a reason, and they give even less support to your arguments than the regular texts because only a tiny number of people think they're anything other than myth.

By the way, quit with the personal attacks. They make you look like a pissy 12 year old.

You can't get Metalligod to admit to any flaws, Craftian. Trust me.

A noble attempt, nonetheless.

quote:Originally posted by Craftian:

[b] Where did I say I read the Bible?...b]

Yeah real cute. Taking what I say and mixing it up, to make it say what you want it to. I never said that Satan not being is is the truth. And everyone who've read my post knows that. So you and your dick riding friends Ashes can both eat shit.

I would love for someone to prove what I said false, I will obviously learn from it. I've never Said that it is true that Satan wasn't evil and you know it. You can use Ashes tactics all day, of remixing my posts.

But if your going to do it plz tell the truth. And please do tell me when I said Satan was beutiful but ugly. You dumbass, that doesn't even make sense, and I never wrote that.

Where did you say I gave false info, hmm, you didn't exactly say it that's why I never quoted that you said it. But you did imply it, when, hmm lets see..."You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass."

And also, "(btw, the Bible says what they look like)"

You then went on with a quote which didn't tell of all orders which you implied that it did. When you said, "(btw, the Bible says what 'they' look like)"

It can't be explained in one quote because there is more than one type of angel.

When I proved this to your cheerleader-Ashes-he tried as well to prove that I didn't know what I was talking about. But I shut him up.

And you want proof on how Satan is said to look, but you say you've read the bible. Cherubs ans well as other angels DO NOT APPEAR IN THE SAME FORM ALL THE TIME! How fuckin hard is it to understan?!

Seraphs can appear as fiery serpents or the hominid form. Cherubs can look as it look in Botticelli's paintings or as the hideous beast that was in Eden. With the body of a spinx and the claws of an eagle.

Have have no proof to back your accusation, and you lie in your posts. So what you say in invalid. I've never said Satan wasn't evil, and that's the truth.

I proposed that as a theory and a theory only. And I told you of text that supported that theory. Now to both you bitches, if there is no flaw to admit to, then how can I admit to my flaw?

You wanna quote, you fuckin pansy quote the whole damend sentence.

I said:

"Ok dumbass, plz tell me when and which part of my post, did I say that, what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth."

Now I've offered backing to both the truth and my theory.Were's your backing???

Oh Ashes since you feel so adamant about my flaw help him. Show those flaws.

You never said you've read the bible, put again implied when you said the bible said what they looked like. I'll give you that never said it. But it doesn't excuse the fact that your a liar.

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-09-2004).]

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-09-2004).]

Metalligod: If I'm correct, I believe that you are saying all these things about angelology are true. This is the part Craftian has trouble with(I think). They are true, in that the Catholic Church sticks by them(and you would find this information in the New Catholic Encyclopedia), yet as to their metaphysical truth, no one can be sure.

quote:Originally posted by CesareBorgia:

Metalligod: If I'm correct, I believe that you are saying all these things about angelology are true. This is the part Craftian has trouble with(I think). They are true, in that the Catholic Church sticks by them(and you would find this information in the New Catholic Encyclopedia), yet as to their metaphysical truth, no one can be sure.





But you see that's just it, angeology backs up what I say about the angels. But he is blind to truth, he does not get it. I've stressed this to him and it still does not seem to penetrate the surface of his mind.

The only thing that is not totally true, which is wht I say it's a theory, the statement, I believe Satan is not evil.

I've stressed this to him as a seperate issuse, and have facts to back it up yet he can't seem to understand this either. So I just quit.

He believes just because something is on Rotten.com, it is TRUTH. I bet if they told him he had a pussy, he wouldn't argue.

Dude I'm trippin, I by mistake quoted the Quaran. how ever the Thrones also were said to be those that were the Lords chariots.

"Thrones -

Also known as 'ophanim' and 'galgallin', thrones are the actual chariots driven by the cherubim. They are depicted as great wheels with many eyes and exist at the point in the cosmos where material form begins to take place."

Tese angels are also called Galgal, or Galgallians. They were angels, but the where chariot. Strange creature. I think Ezekial-or how ever the hell it's spelled-saw them and described them.

1:13-19



[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-10-2004).]

I noticed something in Craftians post that annoyed me. He quoted Metalligod as having said:

quote:what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth. It being a theory makes it a possibility of truth.

And replied with:

quote:Ahhhh... so it's true, yet it's also a theory that is only possibly true.

Riiiighhht.

Now, the fact that he merged two lines into one quotes doesn't bother me . People do that all the time. What annoys me is that he just picked a certain part os what Metalligod said without quoting it fully to make an invalid point.

What metalligod said was:

quote:Ok dumbass, plz tell me when and which part of my post, did I say that, what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth.

Craftian simply picked out the part where he said [i]'what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth.' in an attempt to claim that Metalligod said something he didn't. Either Im missing something or Craftian did something that I [and Im sure others] consider bullshit.

Craftian, if you lack certain evidence to back up an argument just drop it, don't go fucking around with what people said to make yourself look right!

seraph...aral

seraphim

aralim

ok ok ok

anyways...this post is the shit, thanks posters.

Thank heavens for Sen d-f.

He thinks making stupid ass comments the way he did is kewl. It it sickens me, that I thought Ashes was smart. (I jus read this and it seemed like I was talking to Sen d-f-So I'm making it clear, he= craftian)

He supported this, and implied that I was wrong. Yet he offered no proof to back their accusation. Pathetic!

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-10-2004).]

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-10-2004).]

Err metalligod you said:

"I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations."

Whether that is what you meant or not, that is how it turned out. You even say: "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false."

The fact that Craftian changed your words, as SEN D-F pointed out, is in reality irrelevant because it does not change what is at discussion. That is: You claimed it was the truth, when in reality it was your theory.





[This message has been edited by Rust (edited 04-10-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

Err metalligod you said:

"I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations."

Whether that is what you meant or not, that is how it turned out. You even say: "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false."

The fact that Craftian changed your words, as SEN D-F pointed out, is in reality irrelevant because it does not change what is at discussion. That is: You claimed it was the truth, when in reality it was your theory.



[This message has been edited by Rust (edited 04-10-2004).]



I'm really trying not to get pissed off at you. However you come like your so smart yet you quote something that's from A DIFFERENT POST THAN THE ONE HE QUOTED.

You need to get facts straight before for you go piping off your fake 'quoted contradictions.

I never claimed my fuckin theory was true. Now your the who needs proof of your accusation. Don't jump into a convo, with out all the info. Have a nice day!

Fuckin jerk!



[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-10-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

Err metalligod you said:

"I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations."

Whether that is what you meant or not, that is how it turned out.

When he said that he was talking about the info he posted about angels, which as far as I can tell is true. What Craftian was trying to say was that Metalligod was claiming his theory on Satan to be truth.

Don't assume because somewhere he says in the thread 'what I said is true' that it pertains to everything hes said. It was very clear what he was talking about when he said that.

[This message has been edited by SEN D-F (edited 04-10-2004).]

quote:Don't assume because somewhere he says in the thread 'what I said is true' that it pertains to everything hes said. It was very clear what he was talking about when he said that.

Sorry, but you just assume the same. Your only refutation against what I said is that it did not pertain to everything. Why? Because it is unclear to what it pertains too. But then you say it was "clear" to what he refered? Please.

The statement alone would had been unclear as it alone does not specifically say to what he refered to, yet he added: "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false." (Something you left out of your reply...)

quote:

I'm really trying not to get pissed off at you. However you come like your so smart yet you quote something that's from A DIFFERENT POST THAN THE ONE HE QUOTED.

You need to get facts straight before for you go piping off your fake 'quoted contradictions.

I never claimed my fuckin theory was true. Now your the who needs proof of your accusation. Don't jump into a convo, with out all the info. Have a nice day!

Fuckin jerk!





Now, it seems even you don't know what the hell happened. Here's the order of events for you:

Craftian: "You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass."

You: "I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false. You didn't have a goddamned point, that's why I didn't get it."

Craftian: "OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil.

But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass.

"

Get it? You claimed "what you said was true". Whether you like it or not that statement is so vauge that it could apply to everything you had said. Not only that, you procede to say, "Prove anything I have said to be wrong" which leaves me, as another reader, to believe that you were saying everything was true; including the "Satan is not evil" remarks.

Now tell me, how did I quote "a different post"?



[This message has been edited by Rust (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

Sorry, but you just assume the same. Your only refutation against what I said is that it did not pertain to everything. Why? Because it is unclear to what it pertains too. But then you say it was "clear" to what he refered? Please.

The statement alone would had been unclear as it alone does not specifically say to what he refered to, yet he added: "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false." (Something you left out of your reply...)

It doesn't pertain to anything becasue it's not the post that were talking about. And I didn't not say my theory that Satan wasn't evil was true. If you read things whole instead of bits and pieces then this you'd know!

quote:Originally posted by Rust:



Now, it seems even you don't know what the hell happened. Here's a timeline for you:

Craftian: "You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass."

You: "I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false. You didn't have a goddamned point, that's why I didn't get it."

Craftian: "OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil.

But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass.

"

Get it? You claimed "what you said was true". Whether you like it or not that statement is so vauge that it could apply to everything you had said. Not only that, you procede to say, "Prove anything I have said to be wrong" which leaves me, as another reader, to believe that you were saying everything was true; including the "Satan is not evil" remarks.

Now tell me, how did I quote "a different post"?

You stupid fuckin bitch, he said I was pulling the info about how angels look out of my ass.

Now learn to fuckin read things for what they are. The post We were discussing was the post where he took apart of what I said and made it into something different. If you had half a brain you'd know that!

Just eat shit and die! Useless shit for brains. Why don't you try starting from the very beginging. He said:"OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil."

That wasn't in response to me saying:"I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations"

So get it right bitch!

Your skipping posts. Don't comment on something falsely, cause you have below average mind lapses.

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

Sorry, but you just assume the same. Your only refutation against what I said is that it did not pertain to everything. Why? Because it is unclear to what it pertains too. But then you say it was "clear" to what he refered? Please.

The statement alone would had been unclear as it alone does not specifically say to what he refered to, yet he added: "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false." (Something you left out of your reply...)

It wasn't clear? Are you simple?

quote:Originally posted by Craftian:

Yeah, you laugh at my messages but you obviously don't get my point.

You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass.(btw, the Bible says what they look like)...

quote:Originally posted by Metalligod:

I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false. You didn't have a goddamned point, that's why I didn't get it.

Metalligod quoted that statement from Craftian and responded with what I quoted. What is not clear? Did you not know what Craftian was talking about? If so, thats your fucking problem.

And once again, when he says 'Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false' it still looks clear to me that hes replying to Craftians statment that his info on angels was 'pulled out of his ass'.

Like I said, if you didn't understand what people were talking about thats your problem. Its rediculous to think soemone should have to say '.....and this is pertaining to.....' everytime they say soemthing. I had no trouble determining what Metalligod was saying.

[This message has been edited by SEN D-F (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:You stupid fuckin bitch, he said I was pulling the info about how angels look out of my ass.

Quote when he said that. Please, I'd love to see it.

quote:Now learn to fuckin read things for what they are. The post We were discussing was the post where he took apart of what I said and made it into something different. If you had half a brain you'd know that!



You still don't get it do you? Again, you said:

"I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false. You didn't have a goddamned point, that's why I didn't get it."

You said what you had said was true. What did you say? A bunch of crap, and among that bunch of crap was included the remarks that Satan was not evil. Now you may not have meant that every single thing you said was true, but that is how it came off. Especially when you say: "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false.".

See, I don't give a fuck if Cratian spliced your sentences. That is irrelevant.

quote:And once again, when he says 'Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false' it still looks clear to me that hes replying to Craftians statment that his info on angels was 'pulled out of his ass'.



THAT'S the problem! You say "it looks clear to me..." How the hell does it look clear to you that he meant only the angels when he says "Prove one word I put in this post or any other post to be false". That does not pertain to just angels. That means every fucking word he's said. Every single one.

Again, he may have meant it for only angels, but it means everything. You say it is ridiculous that he has to specify. I think it is ridiculous that doesn’t know how to write what he means and that I am somehow at fault for having to assume it for him.

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

You still don't get it do you? Again, you said:

"I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false. You didn't have a goddamned point, that's why I didn't get it."

You said what you had said was true. What did you say? A bunch of crap, and among that bunch of crap was included the remarks that Satan was not evil. Now you may not have meant that every single thing you said was true, but that is how it came off. Especially when you say: "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false.".

See, I don't give a fuck if Cratian spliced your sentences. That is irrelevant.





You are by far the dumbest specimen ever. Your no more than a complete waste of dna, a waste of electrons, and quark compounds. You should just die!

It's sad that it's that hard to make clear to you. Your skipping posts, and connecting one answer to a post it wasn't in response to.

Sen D-F has pointed them out specifically and still you can't see it. I wish you were dead. I hope you get brutally raped and massacred. Your hopeless, far more hopeless than the idiotic white supremist, who don't know why they hate ppl.

I wish I could revive ppl, so you could be killed in every way I've seen on rotten.com.

I've encountered dense ppl on here. But you I wouldn't even classify as human.

No creature that I've ever known of is as stupid as you. Not even Craftian himself is backing you, because he understands the order in which the posts where made. He can understand the difference between what responses go to which post.

I just hope that you haven't and never will procreate. Or if you have, that your kids not be close to, or as dumb as you. Dumb does not suite you well.

You've reached a level of stupidity, that man has never known. You should be disected and studied for reasons to your level of stupidity. I've never had such an extreme hate for someone, like this I feel now.

I am supremely awestruck by how intellectually inept you are. It's astounding. It's absolutely maddening, just maddening!



[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-11-2004).]

Why do you still think I have the order of events wrong? Why? SENDF Could you atleast explain to him that I have the order correct?

I'll try to argue with you for one last time; mainly because I get a kick out of it.

My point is, you said: " didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true" and then, "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false".

What you said in this quotes is that what you had said was true. Does that include only the description of angels, the 'Satan not being Evil remarks, or both?

Beucase you said, "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false" it means that it would include both the description of angels and the argument about Satan.

Now, you may have wanted to say something else, but this is what you wrote. What you wrote means that everything you said was true, hence Craftian was correct in what he said.

Again, you may have wanted to say something else, but this is what you wrote.

One last thing, why did you not answer when did Craftian say you were pulling the info about angels out of your ass?

If you would have read the whole damn post, you would have saw that I specified what I was talking about.

You want so bad to argue and try and look smart at the same time, but you've done nothing but the very opposite.

I'm done you can believe what you wanna believe, don't really care. The evidence is in my posts. You can either look at it and know it. Or continue to ignore it as you so plainly, and stupidly have.

The discussion on whether Satan was evil or not hadn't even come up, until after the post you keep referring to. When He said I was pulling things out of my ass, we hadn't begun the discussion on what I think of Satan. More proof that supports what I believe about YOU.

Doesn't bother me anymore. I realize that you so stupid you didn't even notice Satan hadn't been an issue yet.So have a nice night.

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

THAT'S the problem! You say "it looks clear to me..." How the hell does it look clear to you that he meant only the angels when he says "Prove one word I put in this post or any other post to be false". That does not pertain to just angels. That means every fucking word he's said. Every single one.

Because it was a response to Craftians statement that hed pulled the info on angels out of his ass. Whats so hard to udnerstand?

Should he have added, 'Oh yeah, and see that quote 2 or 3 lines up, Im still talking about that, incase you had gotten lost somewhere in the first few lines of this post!'.

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

Why do you still think I have the order of events wrong? Why? SENDF Could you atleast explain to him that I have the order correct?.....My point is, you said: " didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true" and then, "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false".

What you said in this quotes is that what you had said was true. Does that include only the description of angels, the 'Satan not being Evil remarks, or both?

He didn't say you had the order wrong, he said 'Your skipping posts, and connecting one answer to a post it wasn't in response to.' which is what you're doing.

What he said was in response to Craftians claim that he pulled the info on angels out of his ass, and you're trying to connect it to his statement about a theory of Satan not being evil. Why else do you think he began the post by quoting Craftians statement about him pulling his info on angels out of his ass?

How clear do you want it to be? He quoted the statement and responded to it. Would you liked him to have reminded you that he was still responding to the same statement in every line of his post so you wouldn't get lost or confused?

It seems to me like you simply made a mistake and misunderstood him. However, rather then simply saying 'Oh, I didn't realize you were responding to Craftians statement' you have tried to justify it by quoting him as saying 'Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false' and saying that in its most literal sense, it can be taken as meaning EVERYTHING he said. Thats rediculous. Sure, in retrospect it may have been a bad choice of words, but theres no way Metalligod could have seen you would have such trouble understanding something so simple.

SENDF:

quote:Because it was a response to Craftians statement that hed pulled the info on angels out of his ass. Whats so hard to udnerstand?

Again, Craftian said "You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass." Nothing about angels specifically. Now of course you could say he was referring to the angels bit but Craftian later replied with this:

"OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil.

But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass." And look at what Craftian quoted! He quoted what Metalligod said about telling the truth!

Hence, Craftian was referring to the bit about Satan not being evil. If that also included the angels bit, frankly I don't give a flying fuck because it is irrelevant to the point I'm trying to make.

Anyways, forget about it. The only reason I posted in this thread was because metalligod was acting like an immature asshole.

[This message has been edited by Rust (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

SENDF:

Again, Craftian said "You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass." Nothing about angels specifically. Now of course you could say he was referring to the angels bit but Craftian later replied with this:

"OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil.

But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass." And look at what Craftian quoted! He quoted what Metalligod said about telling the truth!

And did I not already bring up the fact that Craftian has blatantly attempted to turn around what Metalligod said to get his point across? Just because Craftian said something, doesn't mean it changed what Metalligod said.

If you had any trouble understanding what was being said you need to enroll yourself into kindergarden to learn the basics of reading and comprehension.

quote:And did I not already bring up the fact that Craftian has blatantly attempted to turn around what Metalligod said to get his point across? Just because Craftian said something, doesn't mean it changed what Metalligod said.

If you had any trouble understanding what was being said you need to enroll yourself into kindergarden to learn the basics of reading and comprehension.



Ohh, leave your childsih insults for another time. One is enough.

Now, I just showed you how Craftian was referring to the "Devil is not evil" argument when he said "You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass"! How is that twisting words if that is the sentence that started this whole mess. You and metalligod assumed he was referring to the angles bit when it fact, if you look at his reply imedietly after that it shows that he was referring to the "Devil bit".

I'll paraphrase:

Craftian: "You're lying"

Metalligod: "No, I'm not! What I said was the truth."

Craftian: "You said it was the truth but it was a theory! You look like an ass!"

This is in essence what happened. Nobody twisted any words (except later you accusing people of twisting words). What happened was a misunderstanding; no twisting of words.

[This message has been edited by Rust (edited 04-11-2004).]

Craftian quoted Metalligod as having said:

'what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth. It being a theory makes it a possibility of truth.'

And responded with:

'Ahhhh... so it's true, yet it's also a theory that is only possibly true. Riiiighhht.'

when in reality he said:

'Ok dumbass, plz tell me when and which part of my post, did I say that, what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth.'

Thats not twisting around words I suppose? The fact that he just selected a portion of what was said and used it to make his point is all fine?

Thats the main point I was making in the first place. Not all this bullshit about whether Metalligod is trying to claim his theory to be truth or not. He said hes not so hes fucking not. If its a misunderstanding then fine, but I think hes made himself clear that he doesn't feel his theory to in any way be truth. The point is Craftian has twisted things around to make it better suit his argument, and the above quote proves it.

[This message has been edited by SEN D-F (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:Craftian quoted Metalligod as having saif 'what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth. It being a theory makes it a possibility of truth.' when in reality he said 'Ok dumbass, plz tell me when and which part of my post, did I say that, what I said about Satan not being evil was the truth.'.

Thats not twisting around words I suppose?



Yes it is twisting words! AND? I never challenged that. Still, I don't see how it changes anything. Craftian thought metalligod was claiming it was the truth because of what he said and that still was the argument even after he 'spliced' the sentences. The point is metalligod said he never claimed the "devil argument" was the truth. I then, in my first post in this thread (!!!!), said: "

Err metalligod you said...Whether that is what you meant or not, that is how it turned out. You even say: "Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false."

That was my point all along!

quote:Thats the main point I was making in the first place. Not all this bullshit about whether Metalligod is trying to claim his theory to be truth or not. He said hes not so hes fucking not. If its a misunderstanding then fine, but I think hes made himself clear that he doesn't feel his theory to in any way be truth. The point is Craftian has twisted things around to make it better suit his argument, and the above quote proves it

If that was your point all long, then you really did a bad job doing it. Where you trying to further that point here?:

"Don't assume because somewhere he says in the thread 'what I said is true' that it pertains to everything hes said. It was very clear what he was talking about when he said that."

How about here:

"Metalligod quoted that statement from Craftian and responded with what I quoted. What is not clear? Did you not know what Craftian was talking about? If so, thats your fucking problem.

And once again, when he says 'Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false' it still looks clear to me that hes replying to Craftians statment that his info on angels was 'pulled out of his ass'.

Like I said, if you didn't understand what people were talking about thats your problem. Its rediculous to think soemone should have to say '.....and this is pertaining to.....' everytime they say soemthing. I had no trouble determining what Metalligod was saying.

"

http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

[This message has been edited by Rust (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

If that was your point all long, then you really did a bad job doing it. Where you trying to further that point here?:

"Don't assume because somewhere he says in the thread 'what I said is true' that it pertains to everything hes said. It was very clear what he was talking about when he said that."

How about here:

"Metalligod quoted that statement from Craftian and responded with what I quoted. What is not clear? Did you not know what Craftian was talking about? If so, thats your fucking problem.

And once again, when he says 'Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false' it still looks clear to me that hes replying to Craftians statment that his info on angels was 'pulled out of his ass'.

Like I said, if you didn't understand what people were talking about thats your problem. Its rediculous to think soemone should have to say '.....and this is pertaining to.....' everytime they say soemthing. I had no trouble determining what Metalligod was saying.

"

http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

[This message has been edited by Rust (edited 04-11-2004).]

You think yourself to be soo smart.

Ask yourself this: Did he prove anything Metalligod said to be false?

If your smart then you will come up with the answer, NO!

When he said I was pulling stuff out of my ass, he was talking about what I said on how angels look. I responed with "Porve one word I said on this or any other post false."

Now when I said that, he and everyone else, save for you, understood that I was talking about the info given on how angels look. Not my theory.

If you were smart you'd know that he can't prove my theory wrong, thus making it not 'provably false'. He nor, you nor, I could prove it true or false, it remains a theory. It is a very good possibility, that Satan is not evil, and niether one of us can prove otherwise.

You think yourself smart, yet you never took these things into consideration. You never realized he didn't prove anything false. Your absolutely stupid beyond all limits of man.

And also I did bring much proof, I had backing to my theory. I told him to refer to the book of Enoch, did I not? I also bring up the real damned bible(Hebrew). This to backs up my theory.

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:Ask yourself this: Did he prove anything Metalligod said to be false?

Why the fuck should I ask myself this? Is this part of my argument? No. Is this relevant at all to my argument? No.

quote:When he said I was pulling stuff out of my ass, he was talking about what I said on how angels look. I responed with "Porve one word I said on this or any other post false."

How do you know this? Did he even mention the word angels in his post?

quote:Now when I said that, he and everyone else, save for you, understood that I was talking about the info given on how angels look. Not my theory.

Actually if you had read his reply you would notice he said: "OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil.

But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass." Clearly talking about the devil, not angels.

You got one thing right though. I do "think myself smart". I just think and "BAM!" I'm smart... http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

If that was your point all long, then you really did a bad job doing it.

Obviously I strayed from my initial point when all this crap about Metalligod apparently trying to claim his theory on Satan as being truth [despite openly refering to it as a theory..... I suppose defenitions are lost on some] came about.

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

Actually if you had read his reply you would notice he said: "OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil.

But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass." Clearly talking about the devil, not angels.

You got one thing right though. I do "think myself to be a Gay man". I just think and "BAM!" I'm A Faggot Bitch! When I see an erect dick, I'm like... http://www.totse.com/bbs/eek.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/eek.gif) Whoa, that's huge, can I suck it?!

Is it just me or does this stupid bitch not know her own arguement?

She quoted that I Metalligod said, PROVE ONE WORD FALSE. Her arguement is that indeed I said something false. I have proved several times along with Sen D-F and CesareBorigia, that I made no false statements.

I asked this stupid female, RustyHo, to ask herself has, Craftian proved my words false? Which was RustHo's arguement that I had, but the answer to that question would prove that I hadn't, and she ask's what does it have to do with the aruement? Whatta broad, I've never known a woman this stupid.

And then she quote Craftian, but this was not the post, she and I began arguing about. I hate stupid hoes like her who'll stop at nothing to make themselves right. She starts out with one quote then switches to a completely different one, that's in another post. Give a break.

What you say?!... What RustyHo?!.... Your a MAN?! Well not really that shocked, you looked like a dragqueen anyway.

Now let me quote: quote:But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass.

Totally from a different post than the one that began the arguement. Lame bitch!



[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-11-2004).]

quote:Originally posted by Craftian:

Yeah, you laugh at my messages but you obviously don't get my point.

You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass.

(btw, the Bible says what they look like)

I suppose when he says 'the Bible says what they look like' he is refering to Metalligods theory on Satan rather then what angels look like? Yeah..... http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

And I also suppose he went on to quote the Bible where it talks about what angels look like to further his appaent statement about Metalligods theory on Satan? Yeah..... http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

quote:Originally posted by SEN D-F:

I suppose when he says 'the Bible says what they look like' he is refering to Metalligods theory on Satan rather then what angels look like? Yeah..... http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

And I also suppose he went on to quote the Bible where it talks about what angels look like to further his appaent statement about Metalligods theory on Satan? Yeah..... http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

LOFL This Rust bitch is stupid beyond miracle correction.

After we prove him wrong again, he'll do what he's obviously done. Go quote another line that's not even on the same subject.

You see how he's done this with the onoe above mines. We prove it wrong, he goes to another line.

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

Actually if you had read his reply you would notice he said: "OK, it's true that YOU HAVE A THEORY that Satan isn't evil.

But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass." Clearly talking about the devil, not angels.

Yeah, and thats from a completely different post then the one where he claims that Metalligod pulled the information out of his ass. You do realize people will talk about different things within a thread, and when they do you can't simply choose one of their arguments and say that every post they made is refering to that one?

quote:But when you claim it to be true, without even the slightest backing, you look like an ass." Clearly talking about the devil, not angels.

Isn't the Devil an Angel? Yeah dude your reeeealy smart. http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

Forget it. I posted a reply here but I decided to delete it to stop this bullshit.

[This message has been edited by Rust (edited 04-12-2004).]

Metalligod, SEN...his point was not that Metalligod said anything false, Rust was trying to point out that what Metalligod said was NOT clear. He never said it was a lie, just that it was unclear. I agree that it was unclear at first, after reviewing the posts several times though it DOES come together. Quit bickering over this shit.

Metalligod, a sincere request: Quit insulting people in an arguement and then trying to play civil, you look like a child when you call someone stupid, limitlessly stupid, bitch, moronic, etc. when they haven't insulted you once the entire thread. Hold back a little bit, just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are insulting you; chances are there's just a misunderstanding, as is the case here.

quote:Originally posted by Hexadecimal:

Metalligod, SEN...his point was not that Metalligod said anything false, Rust was trying to point out that what Metalligod said was NOT clear. He never said it was a lie, just that it was unclear. I agree that it was unclear at first, after reviewing the posts several times though it DOES come together. Quit bickering over this shit.

Metalligod, a sincere request: Quit insulting people in an arguement and then trying to play civil, you look like a child when you call someone stupid, limitlessly stupid, bitch, moronic, etc. when they haven't insulted you once the entire thread. Hold back a little bit, just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are insulting you; chances are there's just a misunderstanding, as is the case here.



"That is: You claimed it was the truth, when in reality it was your theory."

This is what he said, now let me scan it with my BS decoder...AKA, he's calling me a liar.

When indeed I've never said my theory was true. And I've stated quite a few times it was indeed a theory.

He doesn't have to outright say, "your a liar" to call me or anyone else a liar. The fact of the matter is he did.

Not trying to inflame this again but:

quote:When indeed I've never said my theory was true.

You said: "What I said was true" That was my point, and now Hexadecimals observation. You saying, "What I said was true" is indeed confusing because it could have referred to your theory. That was my point all along.

quote:And I've stated quite a few times it was indeed a theory.



You stated that after he called you a liar...

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

Not trying to inflame this again but:

You stated that after he called you a liar...

What I said BEFORE Craftian called me a liar:I have this theory about Satan, in which I don't believe he's evil.<<That was the theory part, which is obviously so.

I went on to say:

His rank of angel which is the Cherubim, was indeed a very beutiful creature. They are the smaller angels, with 4 wings, second in rank and look like cupids. Satan would have been very beutiful, and I believe that knowing this God makes him appear to man only in a deformed animal-looking creature, that walks upright and has black wings.

^^^All true by the way.

What Craft said AFTER:Yeah, you laugh at my messages but you obviously don't get my point.

You're pulling all this stuff out of your ass.(btw, the Bible says what they look like)

What I said IN RESPONSE:I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false. You didn't have a goddamned point, that's why I didn't get it.



END OF THE FUCKIN CONVO, YOU USELESS DIM-WIT!

NOW WHO'S THE LIAR, BITCH!!!?

[This message has been edited by Metalligod (edited 04-12-2004).]

I know you said that! Get it through your head!

The point is when you say, "I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false, it can be read as if you were saying that your "theory" was the truth. Get it?

I done replying here. You don't have to even bother replying.

quote:Originally posted by Rust:

I know you said that! Get it through your head!

The point is when you say, "I didn't pull any info out of anywhere but my mind. What I said was true, so I hope you have something to back up your accusations.

Prove one word I put on this and or any other post to be false, it can be read as if you were saying that your "theory" was the truth. Get it?

I done replying here. You don't have to even bother replying.

YOU'VE CHANGED YOUR POINT LIKE 7 TIMES NOW.

WHEN I SAID WHAT I SAID WAS TRUE, WAS IT OR WAS IT NOT IN RESPONSE TO HIM SAYING I WAS PULLING INFO OUT OF MY ASS?

WHEN HE SAID THAT, DID HE OR DID HE NOT AFTERWARDS MAKE IT CLEAR THAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT WHAT I SAID ABOUT HOW THE ANGELS LOOK???

JUST GIVE UP AND DIE, YOU WERE WRONG. AND THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN SEVERAL TIMES. SINCE YOU FEEL SO ADAMANT THAT MY INFO WAS WRONG, PULL UP THE FALSE INFO BITCH!