Think about it. If the anwser is yes, god is limited. If the anwser is no, god is limited. And God is NOT limited.

I think that question in itself proves god nonexistant. At least the Christian god anywat.

can god kill himself?

can god get lost?

can god make an exact copy of himself?

can god create a being more powerful than himself?

what else can't god do?????

Fucking Christ people; the thing is, God itself is an illogical concept, and if one were to exist, they wouldn't be bound by logic were they to possess any of the three logically impossible traits of omnipotence, omniscience, or omnibenevolence.

Sound a wee bit crazy? Oh well; illogical beings don't exactly follow logic, now do they?

I am an atheist by the way.

quote:Originally posted by Hexadecimal:

Sound a wee bit crazy? Oh well; illogical beings don't exactly follow logic, now do they?



Why is God illogical?

Can you make a question so dumb that you lose brain cells in the process of conteplating it's grammatical structure?

No. A rock is a physical object. Really not too hard to do, when you realize that The Creator created existence and everything within it.

Could god microwave a burrito so hot , he himself could not eat it?. . .

or some moonshine so strong,he could not drink it?

Wittgenstein?

Can god interfere with your free will?

The answer will reveal the creator's power.

quote:Originally posted by ---Beany---:

Why is God illogical?

For the very reason that he is omnipotent yet is bound by his promises. His omnibenevolence contradicts his omnipotence, because with infinite goodness he does not have the power to be evil. Each of a gods supposed traits limit the other three, making none of the omni in the typical sense than omni means infinitely...if you want to argue that a god is very powerful, occupies much of existent, and is very good, then the logical fallacies of their being is transferred over to claims that the being is all of existence, or holds supreme reign over existence. Also, if one logically concludes that a god could only have omni status in one of the three 'god traits', the being would itself need a perfect creator (which as said, is illogical) to bring about its existence if existing beings are the result of an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent figurehead. Essentially, either gods would be illogical (The one must people go with), or an infinite chain of creators would be needed, resulting in one near perfect creator and an infinite amount of lesser creators all the way down to non-living, non-creating matter (The one most philosophy based eastern religions are centered around, and the one I was predisposed to since it's logically sound as a supposition, though lacks any evidence of a level of creator any higher than humans[that is, if you judge creation on the will behind it, or the outcome...humans would be the highest evidenced 'creators' based on will, the origins of the universe based on outcome.).