Log in

View Full Version : Is truth defined only as observable fact?


cerebraldisorder
2005-01-17, 19:22
This question stems from many posts in several discussions on God and religion, and what is considered the 'facts' that are accepted, and what is just 'opinion' or 'hearsay', particularly having to do with God, the Bible, and Christianity...

dyslexiclettuce
2005-01-18, 02:14
I think you really had to be there to have any sort of proof that Jesus really existed or if Adam and Eve were kicked out of the garden of Eden. History gets so convoluted with each historian's opinion and viewpoint that there are no true written truths.

cerebraldisorder
2005-01-18, 16:18
quote:Originally posted by dyslexiclettuce:

I think you really had to be there to have any sort of proof that Jesus really existed or if Adam and Eve were kicked out of the garden of Eden. History gets so convoluted with each historian's opinion and viewpoint that there are no true written truths.

So each individual can only make rational decisions based on their own specific observations of life and reality?

So the conclusions that I make from what I have observed and analyzed could be vastly different than the results that you get from your experiences. How do we know which of us is right, without an independent guideline to compare our results and conclusions?

deptstoremook
2005-01-19, 01:10
quote:Originally posted by cerebraldisorder:

So each individual can only make rational decisions based on their own specific observations of life and reality?

So the conclusions that I make from what I have observed and analyzed could be vastly different than the results that you get from your experiences. How do we know which of us is right, without an independent guideline to compare our results and conclusions?

The only possible route is relativism; ie, everyone is right. Since we can never objectively measure anything, we have to assume everybody is equal.

dyslexiclettuce
2005-01-20, 04:34
Indeed, we live in a world full of different shades of gray.

Tyrant
2005-01-20, 05:29
The only possible route is relativism; ie, everyone is right. Since we can never objectively measure anything, we have to assume everybody is equal.

How does that even strike you as a possible route? Certain ideas, especially concerning the experience of God, are mutually exclusive in their nature. And there is certainly no reason to assume everybody is equal; where's the logical connection to THAT catastrophe?

Uncus
2005-01-20, 21:43
Not all truth is necessarily easily observable.

cerebraldisorder
2005-01-20, 21:56
quote:Originally posted by Uncus:

Not all truth is necessarily easily observable.



I agree, for some of the most profund truth takes years of personal research, study, and reflection to uncover.

And even then, there is always more to unearth and discover...

[This message has been edited by cerebraldisorder (edited 01-20-2005).]