King James was a well known homosexual (well, bisexual if you want to get technical), so why is it Christians think homosexuality is wrong, but still use a homosexual's bible?

i dont realy know but i imagine a lot of folks are gonna come an say that they dont think its wrong and its only the catholic sect that does. good chance im wrong though...

No takers eh? Yes, this is a very embarasing topic for the church. So much, that they have in many cases tried to rewrite history in order to cover up the fact King James was not only sexing his "Favorites" (A group of young men who were the prefered company of the king), but he was also having relations with his own cousin.

I don't think it's very important, King James just commissioned the Bible, he didn't translate it. I don't think any of it's readers would consider it sinful/hipocritical for reading a Bible just because a homosexual happened to be King when the Church of England decided to present the problems of the English translations available at the time.

i have favorites too.my number is-698-2615 im so fucking high.whirred like a bhirred.

If he actually wrote the bible, then you might have a point, but considering he didn't write the bible, you don't have a point.

No, it's not embarassing. It's not worth commenting on.