some things, dont requite scientific evidence to be real.. for example.. relationships, love.. etc.. but suddenly , for death.. it requires it? suddenly you must have scientific evidence for it to be real?

But there is a science to love, relationships, and death.

It is not that it lacks or requires scientific evidence; it is that it is beyond human science at its current state.

quote:Originally posted by ck_psy_sjk:



some things, dont requite scientific evidence to be real.. for example.. relationships, love.. etc.. but suddenly , for death.. it requires it? suddenly you must have scientific evidence for it to be real?



A relationship and love are human constructs. And death is pretty damned well a scientific certainty. Get a real arguement.

What the fuck is the argument? Death is a certainty. Love is an emotion, and relationships are just part of our social nature. Again: what the fuck is the argument?

Woa. This thread is stupid!

*GONG*

Cheers,

Lost