deptstoremook
2005-10-20, 04:23
Look! A topic that's not about Christianity, and which is not aggressive! Flock here!
I am really tempted to put this in Humanities because Buddhism strikes me as a philosophy and not a religion, but status quo demands it go here.
This topic stems from what is probably the most lofty conversation I've ever had with a girl (no offense, blah blah blah)--she is a Buddhist and it garnered some interesting information.
I don't have a really good grasp of any of the Eastern religions (except Islam, due to a Pakistani friend, but that's Judeo-Christian, anyway) but they have interested me to a small extent.
I think what I find the most fascinating is the gigantic gap between Western thinking, which is almost universally (maybe with the exception of Nietzsche) binary--right/wrong, good/evil--and Eastern thinking, which, while it does impose morals, is so much more unclear--I'm a sucker for ambiguity.
Anyway, what my debate president told me is that the goal of Buddhism is to attain nirvana which is "literally defined as 'to snuff out'," and which signifies an end to the cycle of reincarnation in which Buddhists believe.
I was surprised to learn that nirvana could be (and has been) reached before death--naturally, this opened up a whole other can of metaphysical worms.
From the literal definition, I have come to understand that nirvana is the atheist's death--she also described it as "peace." In other words, it's an existence beyond consciousness and which is really non-existence; death without an afterlife, in other words.
I want to make a trite comment here: Buddhism is trippy as hell. I know of no other fully formed philosophy which investigates non-existence to such an intense degree, and which places such a high emphasis on it. I've always had a soft spot for the contemplation of a pure negative, and Buddhism really contemplates it.
Perhaps the most interesting thing about nirvana, as I mentioned above, is that it can be experienced while alive. This seems to me the biggest rift between Christianity and Buddhism--you can get to nirvana while alive, but not heaven. It also seems that attaining nirvana does not require faith--one may merely meditate and follow certain guidelines to attain it; bliss is not a hallucination or a mania, as heaven may be--it is provable and temporal.
ITT we contemplate nirvana and establish a working definition of it.
Also, it would be great if somebody could recommend a beginner, English language text on Buddhism. It's definitely a fascinating philosophy, even from a secular standpoint--a breath of fresh air after the cultural imperialism of Christianity.
I am really tempted to put this in Humanities because Buddhism strikes me as a philosophy and not a religion, but status quo demands it go here.
This topic stems from what is probably the most lofty conversation I've ever had with a girl (no offense, blah blah blah)--she is a Buddhist and it garnered some interesting information.
I don't have a really good grasp of any of the Eastern religions (except Islam, due to a Pakistani friend, but that's Judeo-Christian, anyway) but they have interested me to a small extent.
I think what I find the most fascinating is the gigantic gap between Western thinking, which is almost universally (maybe with the exception of Nietzsche) binary--right/wrong, good/evil--and Eastern thinking, which, while it does impose morals, is so much more unclear--I'm a sucker for ambiguity.
Anyway, what my debate president told me is that the goal of Buddhism is to attain nirvana which is "literally defined as 'to snuff out'," and which signifies an end to the cycle of reincarnation in which Buddhists believe.
I was surprised to learn that nirvana could be (and has been) reached before death--naturally, this opened up a whole other can of metaphysical worms.
From the literal definition, I have come to understand that nirvana is the atheist's death--she also described it as "peace." In other words, it's an existence beyond consciousness and which is really non-existence; death without an afterlife, in other words.
I want to make a trite comment here: Buddhism is trippy as hell. I know of no other fully formed philosophy which investigates non-existence to such an intense degree, and which places such a high emphasis on it. I've always had a soft spot for the contemplation of a pure negative, and Buddhism really contemplates it.
Perhaps the most interesting thing about nirvana, as I mentioned above, is that it can be experienced while alive. This seems to me the biggest rift between Christianity and Buddhism--you can get to nirvana while alive, but not heaven. It also seems that attaining nirvana does not require faith--one may merely meditate and follow certain guidelines to attain it; bliss is not a hallucination or a mania, as heaven may be--it is provable and temporal.
ITT we contemplate nirvana and establish a working definition of it.
Also, it would be great if somebody could recommend a beginner, English language text on Buddhism. It's definitely a fascinating philosophy, even from a secular standpoint--a breath of fresh air after the cultural imperialism of Christianity.