LostCause
2006-04-24, 08:41
I found this on the ground today and haven't even read it yet.
-----------------------------------------------
If God was to come down with awesome power and determine right and wrong, it could be stated forever that Gods' prower, not principle, is the foundation of creation, leaving no basis for moral integrity. The existence of principles separate from the use of force would not be demonstrated simply through power from above. It would be argued by some that strength is the basis for right and wrong, not principle, the nothing is really good only power exists. Thus a superhuman Savior has no moral basis of authority. But are there principles? Will crime and injustice ever stop? Those without awesome powers can demonstrate princples apart from power. People without the powers of God can accomplish moral authority. How?
Anyone claiming to be the final arbiter of justice like an emperor or kind is creating a power standard. Because God said so, therefore it's right, is an example of an arbitrary set of rules. Since God cannot be wrong. He sets not the standard because the standard must incorporate what is wrong. It would be better for people, starting from a low powered, stone-age like beginning, to create systems based on principles, not having Gods' power as their ultimate authority, separate right from wrong. Thus we should not, in defending God's righteousness, pray to see a miraculous savior of the world.
We have a low beginning, or at least a low powered position in creation. Humans are in an ideal position for the development of a system or systems based on principles, not having power as the ultimate basis for authority, to separate good from evil here on Earth! Thus presented is a unique opportunity.
If God, with his greatest of powers, simply terminates all evil, whatever He arbitrarily determined evil to be, accusations raised initially by wickedness would not receive best evidence. "Does not Might Make Right" or that power determines right from wrong, being one of those slanderous accusations. If God's power determines right, then using power is always determinding right and power separate from principle is nonexistent. Then abuse of power never happens and there is no such thing as unfair, injustice, or oppression. If all were justice, there would be no such thing as violating the right of the innocent. The power-quest and grab all you can; destroy anone who gets in your way, becomes the way to progress. Wealth and success in life would be from the criminal use of power. And for the lowly one, "since suffering therefore guilty" or "since executed therefore guilty" and "you [always] reek what you sew" which implies; "they always get what they deserve". Thus if you are suffering, you deserve it and there is no such thing as human rights violations and the exploitation of innocence. Also implies is; "since not punished therefore no guilty" and those in power, since not being punished, are in the right however they use their power and "Might makes Right" would be the ultimate conclusion. Since not punished therefore innocent and if someone has enough power to get away with a criminal act, he is not guilty. A powerfull rebuttal from God to the slanderous accusations would not reveal the exploitation of innocence by anyone powerful because if you don't have the power to protect yourself you are guilty. You would never be innocent if suffering abuse. Thus humans are extremely important.
What about the opposite proposal to Might and Right? Those who say, "Right makes Might" have a good point, it can and usually goes. The most successful people are usually the most principled and rich people in a free economy are usually hard working with the strongest Family Values. Thus Right making Might is another disproof to the slanderous accusations, but not always. Wrong can make wealth also. One can also become rich at least for a time by selling drugs. Thus Right makes wealth and so can Wrong. There is a difference between what is right and what is powerful which must be demonstrated apart from power. The difference betwen the two is that Might does not make Right, which is here on earth apartment from universal power. We know this because a drug pusher can get rich and the inventor of a fabulous new invention, improving the lives of millions, can also get rich. Ideally then, humans develop systems based on principles, not power, on earth, to delineate power and principle forever.
Since complete independence from God is Godlessness, God must eventually act in world affairs. Yet there remains a right wy and wrong way even for The Creator. A standard must be set first. Otherwise all must be His slaves, a sick relationship. To say mankind needs a master as savior is belittling to human dignity and slanders God by claiming He plans a universal dictatorship for Himself, and humiliating His earthly children. The quote, "Only God can save the world", must be an attempt to move us towards Satan, looking above for determining right and wrong. See the present as a unique, never to be repeated chance. Work on solving world problems.
On is not an active participant in an evil world without getting blood on their hands. God is therefore a passive observer in world affairs. Rarely, if eve, God has taken action on Earth at least since the creation of Eve. For this reason Satan must have assumed he could win. No power could determine wrong and none in this world began above him. No standard determining right and wrong existed at one time because at one time nothing was wrong. Thus decieved by their own reasoning, the satanic must have come to believe they could get away with crime, become all powerful like God; because they percieved everything as an interaction of powers. They assumed no other possibility could exist. Thus began the use of power as they pleased, without principle. ANY use of force they viewed as justified because God is the most powerful. Thus the inconceivable happened and pain and suffereing came to exist.
Imagine the creation so pure and innocent that no one even thought to harm anothe! The very thought of being attacked and therefore preparations to defend oneself were never made. Projecting weakness/vulnerability on this, crime appeared easy like taking candy from a baby, no defenses exist and we can dominate the universe they reson. But the fact of matters are, they have failed to gain complete control even here on earth. They suffer humiliating defeats continuously by righteously inclined individual thorough all history who resist criminal powers. Thus proved again and again is that Might Never Made Right alone.
corollaries:
* Works are the basis for salvation. Humanities outcome need not be carried bya single individual effort (a savior) but by what we do as a whole. I four good works outweigh our bas in sufficient numbers, humanity should attain salvation without slavery by power. All the good done by humans, not looking to the stars for guidance, but by humans taking their rightful place among the stars saves the world.
* Since evil exists, salvation is no longer universal. To say no one is guilty is to say God is guilty because suffering exists. Responsibility for world conditions must be somewhere. Then judgement is certain.
* Evil relies on power to be the ultimate basis of Gods creation; force fields in science.
* Good is principled unlike bad, not an equal but opposite force on the same universal scale like yin/yang percieves.
Also and in conjunction with infinite power as explained in chapter three, if God the Creator, was almighty (all powerful), we would not have any power of our own. Some strength is necessary to exercise free will. If God was almight: having all the power, we'd have no free will and He would be responsible for Satans' evil and our own mistakes.
The Constitution of the United States is one example of best evidence provided before all creation. Metaphysical precepts and moral principles incarnated; a savior of the world if we are to be saved. Its laws, based on innocence are moral. The world unity is a dangerous illusion because democratic principles only work on limited governments thus national borders. Striving for world unity has always led to wars. Thus the United States federation of state governments is the "mountain" government of Bible prophecy that can crush all inferior mountains (non democratic governments) bringing peace on Earth -- God's Kingdom and the standard of righteousnes in Daniel 2:45. The people of the world must look to the American Experiment for salvation and stop praying to spirits for salvation. No greater principles have been expressed in government. This we find as further discussed in part two of this book as developments from the Bible, Jefferson's Deism and The Great Democratic Experiment (U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence). These documents separate good and evil apart from power as explained in part two. If the American Experiment ends, if enough people choose immorality, evil well end in some other world in some other way, which you may not live to see. Live free or die.
--------------------------------------------
Cheers,
Lost
-----------------------------------------------
If God was to come down with awesome power and determine right and wrong, it could be stated forever that Gods' prower, not principle, is the foundation of creation, leaving no basis for moral integrity. The existence of principles separate from the use of force would not be demonstrated simply through power from above. It would be argued by some that strength is the basis for right and wrong, not principle, the nothing is really good only power exists. Thus a superhuman Savior has no moral basis of authority. But are there principles? Will crime and injustice ever stop? Those without awesome powers can demonstrate princples apart from power. People without the powers of God can accomplish moral authority. How?
Anyone claiming to be the final arbiter of justice like an emperor or kind is creating a power standard. Because God said so, therefore it's right, is an example of an arbitrary set of rules. Since God cannot be wrong. He sets not the standard because the standard must incorporate what is wrong. It would be better for people, starting from a low powered, stone-age like beginning, to create systems based on principles, not having Gods' power as their ultimate authority, separate right from wrong. Thus we should not, in defending God's righteousness, pray to see a miraculous savior of the world.
We have a low beginning, or at least a low powered position in creation. Humans are in an ideal position for the development of a system or systems based on principles, not having power as the ultimate basis for authority, to separate good from evil here on Earth! Thus presented is a unique opportunity.
If God, with his greatest of powers, simply terminates all evil, whatever He arbitrarily determined evil to be, accusations raised initially by wickedness would not receive best evidence. "Does not Might Make Right" or that power determines right from wrong, being one of those slanderous accusations. If God's power determines right, then using power is always determinding right and power separate from principle is nonexistent. Then abuse of power never happens and there is no such thing as unfair, injustice, or oppression. If all were justice, there would be no such thing as violating the right of the innocent. The power-quest and grab all you can; destroy anone who gets in your way, becomes the way to progress. Wealth and success in life would be from the criminal use of power. And for the lowly one, "since suffering therefore guilty" or "since executed therefore guilty" and "you [always] reek what you sew" which implies; "they always get what they deserve". Thus if you are suffering, you deserve it and there is no such thing as human rights violations and the exploitation of innocence. Also implies is; "since not punished therefore no guilty" and those in power, since not being punished, are in the right however they use their power and "Might makes Right" would be the ultimate conclusion. Since not punished therefore innocent and if someone has enough power to get away with a criminal act, he is not guilty. A powerfull rebuttal from God to the slanderous accusations would not reveal the exploitation of innocence by anyone powerful because if you don't have the power to protect yourself you are guilty. You would never be innocent if suffering abuse. Thus humans are extremely important.
What about the opposite proposal to Might and Right? Those who say, "Right makes Might" have a good point, it can and usually goes. The most successful people are usually the most principled and rich people in a free economy are usually hard working with the strongest Family Values. Thus Right making Might is another disproof to the slanderous accusations, but not always. Wrong can make wealth also. One can also become rich at least for a time by selling drugs. Thus Right makes wealth and so can Wrong. There is a difference between what is right and what is powerful which must be demonstrated apart from power. The difference betwen the two is that Might does not make Right, which is here on earth apartment from universal power. We know this because a drug pusher can get rich and the inventor of a fabulous new invention, improving the lives of millions, can also get rich. Ideally then, humans develop systems based on principles, not power, on earth, to delineate power and principle forever.
Since complete independence from God is Godlessness, God must eventually act in world affairs. Yet there remains a right wy and wrong way even for The Creator. A standard must be set first. Otherwise all must be His slaves, a sick relationship. To say mankind needs a master as savior is belittling to human dignity and slanders God by claiming He plans a universal dictatorship for Himself, and humiliating His earthly children. The quote, "Only God can save the world", must be an attempt to move us towards Satan, looking above for determining right and wrong. See the present as a unique, never to be repeated chance. Work on solving world problems.
On is not an active participant in an evil world without getting blood on their hands. God is therefore a passive observer in world affairs. Rarely, if eve, God has taken action on Earth at least since the creation of Eve. For this reason Satan must have assumed he could win. No power could determine wrong and none in this world began above him. No standard determining right and wrong existed at one time because at one time nothing was wrong. Thus decieved by their own reasoning, the satanic must have come to believe they could get away with crime, become all powerful like God; because they percieved everything as an interaction of powers. They assumed no other possibility could exist. Thus began the use of power as they pleased, without principle. ANY use of force they viewed as justified because God is the most powerful. Thus the inconceivable happened and pain and suffereing came to exist.
Imagine the creation so pure and innocent that no one even thought to harm anothe! The very thought of being attacked and therefore preparations to defend oneself were never made. Projecting weakness/vulnerability on this, crime appeared easy like taking candy from a baby, no defenses exist and we can dominate the universe they reson. But the fact of matters are, they have failed to gain complete control even here on earth. They suffer humiliating defeats continuously by righteously inclined individual thorough all history who resist criminal powers. Thus proved again and again is that Might Never Made Right alone.
corollaries:
* Works are the basis for salvation. Humanities outcome need not be carried bya single individual effort (a savior) but by what we do as a whole. I four good works outweigh our bas in sufficient numbers, humanity should attain salvation without slavery by power. All the good done by humans, not looking to the stars for guidance, but by humans taking their rightful place among the stars saves the world.
* Since evil exists, salvation is no longer universal. To say no one is guilty is to say God is guilty because suffering exists. Responsibility for world conditions must be somewhere. Then judgement is certain.
* Evil relies on power to be the ultimate basis of Gods creation; force fields in science.
* Good is principled unlike bad, not an equal but opposite force on the same universal scale like yin/yang percieves.
Also and in conjunction with infinite power as explained in chapter three, if God the Creator, was almighty (all powerful), we would not have any power of our own. Some strength is necessary to exercise free will. If God was almight: having all the power, we'd have no free will and He would be responsible for Satans' evil and our own mistakes.
The Constitution of the United States is one example of best evidence provided before all creation. Metaphysical precepts and moral principles incarnated; a savior of the world if we are to be saved. Its laws, based on innocence are moral. The world unity is a dangerous illusion because democratic principles only work on limited governments thus national borders. Striving for world unity has always led to wars. Thus the United States federation of state governments is the "mountain" government of Bible prophecy that can crush all inferior mountains (non democratic governments) bringing peace on Earth -- God's Kingdom and the standard of righteousnes in Daniel 2:45. The people of the world must look to the American Experiment for salvation and stop praying to spirits for salvation. No greater principles have been expressed in government. This we find as further discussed in part two of this book as developments from the Bible, Jefferson's Deism and The Great Democratic Experiment (U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence). These documents separate good and evil apart from power as explained in part two. If the American Experiment ends, if enough people choose immorality, evil well end in some other world in some other way, which you may not live to see. Live free or die.
--------------------------------------------
Cheers,
Lost