Log in

View Full Version : Are we just Gods experiment!?!


Masta Thief
2007-01-12, 22:18
(Christian) I've heard a theory that he created us as an experiment. He would give a creature created in his image freewill and see how how humanity would unfold. and every so often guide us with an invisible hand to further the experiment to its end. maybe he just wanted to see if people would choose to follow him or stray away from thier creator and he would reward those who followed and punished those who followed the devils way. maybe the devils turning was the whole reason for this, to see who would follow the devils path or his.

not so unbeleivable to me.



Disscus!

Nephtys-Ra
2007-01-12, 22:35
If you're Christian, then you believe god is allknowing, so why would he need to do any kind of experiment? He would know the results automatically.

A better theory is that we are God's debris, that God, being allknowing, has only thing he could not possibly know. What would happen if he were to cease to exist. If he didn't exist, could he still percieve anything?

Using this logic, he may have blasted himself into billions of tiny pieces, or humans.

And as we grow, mature and evolve we come closer and closer to establishing ourselves as God, much like a neural network in the brain creates something greather than the sum of its parts.

Credit Scott Adams.

Masta Thief
2007-01-12, 22:38
quote:Originally posted by Nephtys-Ra:

If you're Christian, then you believe god is allknowing, so why would he need to do any kind of experiment? He would know the results automatically.

A better theory is that we are God's debris, that God, being allknowing, has only thing he could not possibly know. What would happen if he were to cease to exist. If he didn't exist, could he still percieve anything?

Using this logic, he may have blasted himself into billions of tiny pieces, or humans.

And as we grow, mature and evolve we come closer and closer to establishing ourselves as God, much like a neural network in the brain creates something greather than the sum of its parts.

Credit Scott Adams.

That was the most idiotic theory i evr heard! you sound like one of those tree hugging hippies(no offense it just sounds like something they would say lol).

socratic
2007-01-12, 22:40
No, we aren't God's experiment. As Nepthys said, God is all-knowing and has no need for experiments.

Some things vaguely seem like experimentation, such as Lilith being the first woman. Not only did that go horribly wrong, but it was managed poorly by God, too.

Masta Thief
2007-01-12, 23:25
So what if he was all knowing, could of been for fun? we dont know!

Rizzo in a box
2007-01-13, 00:14
quote:Originally posted by Nephtys-Ra:

If you're Christian, then you believe god is allknowing, so why would he need to do any kind of experiment? He would know the results automatically.

A better theory is that we are God's debris, that God, being allknowing, has only thing he could not possibly know. What would happen if he were to cease to exist. If he didn't exist, could he still percieve anything?

Using this logic, he may have blasted himself into billions of tiny pieces, or humans.

And as we grow, mature and evolve we come closer and closer to establishing ourselves as God, much like a neural network in the brain creates something greather than the sum of its parts.

Credit Scott Adams.

That just blew my fucking mind yet at the same time blew nothing but my cock. I love it.

Source
2007-01-13, 00:21
quote:Originally posted by Masta Thief:

That was the most idiotic theory i evr heard! you sound like one of those tree hugging hippies(no offense it just sounds like something they would say lol).



It's as valid as any other theory.

blacksh33p18
2007-01-13, 03:54
He's just a god fanboy anything that does not coincide with the teachings of the king james bible he knows and accepts as undebated truth (why even post here then?) upsets him like a chimpanzee with a camera (quoted david cross).

DeuceOmen
2007-01-13, 03:59
Be glad your not my experiment shit would make Hostel look like a comedy, which it kinda is anyway.

** Deuce Omen

CreamOfWarholSoup
2007-01-13, 06:05
The platypus was God's experiment.

manic124
2007-01-13, 07:38
Why would an all-powerful, all-seeing, all-knowing being want to create us in the first place?

fallinghouse
2007-01-13, 08:56
If anyone is interested, the theory Nephtys is talking about is introduced in this book (http://images.ucomics.com/images/pdfs/sadams/godsdebris.pdf) available for free on the internet (apparently, no one wanted to publish it).

Its very short, I was able to finish it in a few hours. While I don't agree with all the stuff, it is a nice read.

king koopa
2007-01-14, 22:17
Our moon is actually an alien base and for some reason (possibly for experimentation and observance) we are here because of them. Stop calling the aliens "God" please. Thank you.

glutamate antagonist
2007-01-15, 00:55
quote:Originally posted by manic124:

Why would an all-powerful, all-seeing, all-knowing being want to create us in the first place?

To prove HE DOESN'T EXIST http://www.totse.com/bbs/biggrin.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/biggrin.gif)

Viraljimmy
2007-01-15, 22:28
quote:Originally posted by Masta Thief:

That was the most idiotic theory i evr heard! you sound like one of those tree hugging hippies(no offense it just sounds like something they would say lol).



Lol. You luv the god cock!

ate
2007-01-16, 08:38
^ Yea..pure genius here... http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

Jaimie
2007-01-16, 08:58
Ok, so we've established that god doesn't need to set up an experiment, because he already knows what the result would be.

So maybe we're just in his mind? This is all just him imagining what would happen if he were to create the universe and et cetera.

Hare_Geist
2007-01-16, 09:02
quote:Originally posted by Rizzo in a box:

That just blew my fucking mind yet at the same time blew nothing but my cock. I love it.

Really? I read God's Debris by Scott Adams ages ago, and it came off as something a philosophy 101 student would write in his spare time after discovering Plato and fringe-sites.

Merlinman2005
2007-01-16, 16:51
quote:Originally posted by Jaimie:

[B]Ok, so we've established that god doesn't need to set up an experiment, because he already knows what the result would be.

B]



No we haven't

A few people claiming something doesn't prove it, especially when they're talking about an unprovable dilemma.

Viraljimmy
2007-01-16, 23:09
quote:Originally posted by ate:

^ Yea..pure genius here... http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif (http://www.totse.com/bbs/rolleyes.gif)

Lol. You luv the god cock!

ate
2007-01-17, 00:08
No! We are experimenting Gods!

Jaimie
2007-01-17, 02:28
quote:Originally posted by Merlinman2005:



No we haven't

A few people claiming something doesn't prove it, especially when they're talking about an unprovable dilemma.



So you're telling me an omniscient deity would NOT know what would happen and would need to actually play out the experiment?

Or is there a possibility that god is not omniscient?

Merlinman2005
2007-01-17, 02:35
quote:Originally posted by Jaimie:

So you're telling me an omniscient deity would NOT know what would happen and would need to actually play out the experiment?

Or is there a possibility that god is not omniscient?

I'm telling you we haven't proven shit.

- To suggest that there is something that an omniscient character would not know is ludicrous.

- There is no possibility that "god" (correctly: "God") is not omniscient. BUT there is a poss. that "a god" would not be.

- We do not know what happened, or why we are here. Perhaps once an "experiment" begins, it actually has to HAPPEN (in the false illusional reality that we inhabit) in order for its conclusions to be drawn.

Jaimie
2007-01-17, 18:41
quote:Originally posted by Merlinman2005:

I'm telling you we haven't proven shit.

- To suggest that there is something that an omniscient character would not know is ludicrous.

- There is no possibility that "god" (correctly: "God") is not omniscient. BUT there is a poss. that "a god" would not be.

- We do not know what happened, or why we are here. Perhaps once an "experiment" begins, it actually has to HAPPEN (in the false illusional reality that we inhabit) in order for its conclusions to be drawn.

Ah, man, you've lost me.

Who is "a god"? Aren't we talking specifically about the christian god? Or was that part not important for the rest of your post?

And could you rephrase your last paragraph? I'm not sure I really understand it as-is.

Sorry, I'm just not too used to really... you know... thinking.