DaGuru
2007-06-19, 17:54
There has been an aspect of Christianity that has been troubling me for many months now, and I thought I'd open this thread up for discussion and debate. I'm pretty much a life long searcher of ALL religions, and do believe in some form of loving Creator with the hopes of an afterlife. Forgive me if this gets long, but I really want to get my point across.....
Most Christians believe that as long as you accept Jesus Christ as your savior and at the very least attempt to live your life in a good manner.....there is hope that paradise, heaven, whatever you want to believe awaits you once your dead. But for the vast majority of them, it is 100% FAITH that is backing that belief. Sure there are SOME that claim to have "seen" God in some form, or that they actually "heard him talking to them". For whatever reason these people are lucky enough to encounter this being, and have what I would consider enough evidence to back their lifelong spiritual belief.
But for everyone else, its more or less just faith. A hope. A belief in a promise that they have read, or someone has told them. And this is where I will always fall short to have 100% devotion to ANY god. I have a very thinking and analytical mind, one that is not going to spend the rest of my days devoting my belief system (and perhaps committing my eternal soul) to something where there is even the smallest amount of doubt....i.e...."well it could have been this OR that". Yeah, the Christian Bible has a lot of great ideas coupled with many incredible prophecies....but the point is, in 2007 we are NEVER given irrefutable proof beyond Biblical teachings that Jesus truly is the way.
What I'm trying to get at is something so incredibly profound, that it would be a miracle that would have absolutely no skeptics. Parting the Red Seas. Water into wine. Flipping Mt. Everest upside down. Something. ANYTHING! Now people may come back to me discussing minor shit.....like a newborn baby, a guy flipping his SUV down a cliff 20 times and surviving without a scratch, taking a Pringle out of the can and it has the absolute resemblance of Jesus...etc. But those are just silly parlor tricks (and arguable) compared to some of the miracles described in the Bible.
So here is where my questions really manifests. Lets assume for a moment in a hypothetical scenario that Christianity IS the true religion and Jesus really is our savior. Is it "fair" for us mere mortals living in 2007 to be put under such scrutiny (questioning our faith, and having 100% devotion) without having ANY empirical evidence for our beliefs? My whole point is, we actually have it HARDER than folks seeking religion in biblical times because of the lack of miracles. Not to mention with all the technology and evil surrounding us, we have even more opportunities for temptations and a helluva lot more "gray" areas than ever before.
Think about the folks that were there at the time Moses parted the Red Sea. After witnessing such an astounding event is there ANYONE that could walk away and NOT believe in god? That would be such a profound event, that no matter how many hardships those people endured they would still have that memory......thusly having that 100% faith with perfect reason and understanding for the rest of their lives. Even if someone was not there, they still would be able to intermingle with many other folks that could testify to it happening. And the next couple of generations would STILL be exposed to that miracle, hearing the stories told by fathers and grandfathers......"yup sonny, I was there and it happened".
Fast forward to 2007 and hundreds upon hundreds of generations have passed. Add to the fact the Bible HAS been rewritten over and over with certain adaptations (both purposeful and accidental) and now that whole episode of the Red Sea is no longer an "absolute". All of the current Christians are now going ONLY on faith, and people such as myself are forever longing for some supernatural event to put their devotion into.
So it seems to me if there is any kind of prerequisite to get into heaven, those that lived 2000+ years ago had it much EASIER to have complete faith than the current populace. I can't comprehend the fairness in that. If a loving God really wanted ALL of his subjects to enjoy heaven/paradise shouldn't we be given the same "evidence" that those lucky enough to be around in biblical times were able to witness. Furthermore, its not like we are even engaging this "battle" on an equal playing field. There are countless examples in the Bible where God had his hand in doing this or that to help his followers, yet in 2007 we seem to be left out in the cold fending for ourselves. (And before anyone starts quoting Revelation to me, I know it very well and understand the supposed "purpose" to letting us fly solo)
I for one just don't understand how God created me to have this above average intelligence to think, analyze and question......yet if I dropped over dead an hour from now, I would not receive the eternal blessings I would have gotten if I had 100% faith. All because I haven't been privy enough to witness an elaborate miracle, or have God "talk" to me, or "show me the way". (And yes I've prayed and prayed for God to give me some inkling, some message, some profound purpose to remove all of my doubts) Yet the guy 2000 years ago with 100% devotion, that has 1/2 the brain I do, along with doing only a fraction of the good works that I accomplished in my life......gets eternal paradise all because he was fortunate enough to see a REAL miracle and remove any doubts from his mind?????? Again, from where I'm sitting that is NOT fair in the least.....and I can't comprehend how myself and that person from biblical times should be held accountable equally since after all we were "tested" differently in our lifetimes.
Thoughts, comments, flames?
Most Christians believe that as long as you accept Jesus Christ as your savior and at the very least attempt to live your life in a good manner.....there is hope that paradise, heaven, whatever you want to believe awaits you once your dead. But for the vast majority of them, it is 100% FAITH that is backing that belief. Sure there are SOME that claim to have "seen" God in some form, or that they actually "heard him talking to them". For whatever reason these people are lucky enough to encounter this being, and have what I would consider enough evidence to back their lifelong spiritual belief.
But for everyone else, its more or less just faith. A hope. A belief in a promise that they have read, or someone has told them. And this is where I will always fall short to have 100% devotion to ANY god. I have a very thinking and analytical mind, one that is not going to spend the rest of my days devoting my belief system (and perhaps committing my eternal soul) to something where there is even the smallest amount of doubt....i.e...."well it could have been this OR that". Yeah, the Christian Bible has a lot of great ideas coupled with many incredible prophecies....but the point is, in 2007 we are NEVER given irrefutable proof beyond Biblical teachings that Jesus truly is the way.
What I'm trying to get at is something so incredibly profound, that it would be a miracle that would have absolutely no skeptics. Parting the Red Seas. Water into wine. Flipping Mt. Everest upside down. Something. ANYTHING! Now people may come back to me discussing minor shit.....like a newborn baby, a guy flipping his SUV down a cliff 20 times and surviving without a scratch, taking a Pringle out of the can and it has the absolute resemblance of Jesus...etc. But those are just silly parlor tricks (and arguable) compared to some of the miracles described in the Bible.
So here is where my questions really manifests. Lets assume for a moment in a hypothetical scenario that Christianity IS the true religion and Jesus really is our savior. Is it "fair" for us mere mortals living in 2007 to be put under such scrutiny (questioning our faith, and having 100% devotion) without having ANY empirical evidence for our beliefs? My whole point is, we actually have it HARDER than folks seeking religion in biblical times because of the lack of miracles. Not to mention with all the technology and evil surrounding us, we have even more opportunities for temptations and a helluva lot more "gray" areas than ever before.
Think about the folks that were there at the time Moses parted the Red Sea. After witnessing such an astounding event is there ANYONE that could walk away and NOT believe in god? That would be such a profound event, that no matter how many hardships those people endured they would still have that memory......thusly having that 100% faith with perfect reason and understanding for the rest of their lives. Even if someone was not there, they still would be able to intermingle with many other folks that could testify to it happening. And the next couple of generations would STILL be exposed to that miracle, hearing the stories told by fathers and grandfathers......"yup sonny, I was there and it happened".
Fast forward to 2007 and hundreds upon hundreds of generations have passed. Add to the fact the Bible HAS been rewritten over and over with certain adaptations (both purposeful and accidental) and now that whole episode of the Red Sea is no longer an "absolute". All of the current Christians are now going ONLY on faith, and people such as myself are forever longing for some supernatural event to put their devotion into.
So it seems to me if there is any kind of prerequisite to get into heaven, those that lived 2000+ years ago had it much EASIER to have complete faith than the current populace. I can't comprehend the fairness in that. If a loving God really wanted ALL of his subjects to enjoy heaven/paradise shouldn't we be given the same "evidence" that those lucky enough to be around in biblical times were able to witness. Furthermore, its not like we are even engaging this "battle" on an equal playing field. There are countless examples in the Bible where God had his hand in doing this or that to help his followers, yet in 2007 we seem to be left out in the cold fending for ourselves. (And before anyone starts quoting Revelation to me, I know it very well and understand the supposed "purpose" to letting us fly solo)
I for one just don't understand how God created me to have this above average intelligence to think, analyze and question......yet if I dropped over dead an hour from now, I would not receive the eternal blessings I would have gotten if I had 100% faith. All because I haven't been privy enough to witness an elaborate miracle, or have God "talk" to me, or "show me the way". (And yes I've prayed and prayed for God to give me some inkling, some message, some profound purpose to remove all of my doubts) Yet the guy 2000 years ago with 100% devotion, that has 1/2 the brain I do, along with doing only a fraction of the good works that I accomplished in my life......gets eternal paradise all because he was fortunate enough to see a REAL miracle and remove any doubts from his mind?????? Again, from where I'm sitting that is NOT fair in the least.....and I can't comprehend how myself and that person from biblical times should be held accountable equally since after all we were "tested" differently in our lifetimes.
Thoughts, comments, flames?