View Full Version : U.K. schoolgirl loses ‘virginity ring’ court battle
Synthesis
2007-07-17, 21:15
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19806312/?GT1=10150
I would love nothing more than to rape this stupid bitch and tell her god hates her.
“I believe that the judge’s decision will mean that slowly, over time, people such as school governors, employers, political organizations and others will be allowed to stop Christians from publicly expressing and practicing their faith.”-dumb bitch
^^^good.
ieatchildren234
2007-07-17, 21:35
(“I believe that the judge’s decision will mean that slowly, over time, people such as school governors, employers, political organizations and others will be allowed to stop Christians from publicly expressing and practicing their faith.”-dumb bitch)
^ this is a good thing we dont have to listen to gay christians
anti-religious fanatics.....Europeans make fun of Americans for being fundis, but they are worse when it goes the other way.
anti-religious fanatics.....Europeans make fun of Americans for being fundis, but they are worse when it goes the other way.
anti-religious fanatics.....Europeans make fun of Americans for being fundis, but they are worse when it goes the other way.
So you think thing anyone should be able to break rules if they claim the have a religious excuse? Seiks should be allowed to wear turbans in the U.S. military? Rastafarian's should be able to smoke marijuana, while the rest of us can't?
Why should one be allowed to wear a ring for religious reasons when others can't wear jewelry for their reasons that are non-religious? Why are religious reasons any more special than any other? Being against the religious being granted special rights makes one an anti-religious fanatic?
Religion is belief, not apparel.
wow, that is so fucked up, i mean i reckon its fucking stupid to have a 'virginity ring' but seriously, its a fucking ring. Why not just wear it. lol, at my school you can wear whatever jewelery you want assuming it isnt some crazy hoop earing that is a safety hazzard
I gotta admit, banning a ring is pretty stupid.
Then again, that girl is extremely stupid for wearing one. By the time she's 20, she'll either be a nun or spreading her legs for anyone that looks at her.
ArgonPlasma2000
2007-07-18, 04:25
Thankfully America has the First Amendment and its presupposed "freedom of expression" idea.
987royalman
2007-07-18, 04:28
Religion is belief, not apparel.
perfectly said.
And, either way, purity rings aren't on the religious apparel list. If you want to show your "purity," get a fucking cross.
You need not wear anything to show your faith. There's no need, and there's nothing in the bible that says "you have to wear this ring." It's unnecessary.
EDIT: Removed obscene comment.
CatharticWeek
2007-07-18, 04:49
To bring people together as a whole we need to cut through the dogma that clouds our judgment.
Such is the case in France with the banning of religious articles in public.
Of course, some people think they may be excused because their god is the true god.
There are no exceptions here if we're to make this work.
netspliter
2007-07-18, 08:13
anti-religious fanatics.....Europeans make fun of Americans for being fundis, but they are worse when it goes the other way.
asshole, look at the overal percentages not particular cases.
dumbfuck
jackketch
2007-07-18, 10:54
Thankfully America has the First Amendment and its presupposed "freedom of expression" idea.
Agreed ...although it seems your government is doing as much as it can to curtail that freedom.
But it is still one of many things I admire about the US (yes people you did read that right! There is much I think america has to proud of : McDonalds, muscle cars, The Right To Bear Arms, Microsoft to name but a few.)
fallinghouse
2007-07-18, 12:18
Studies have shown that youths who take vows of abstinence are more likely to have pre-marital sex. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if she's already saluted the incandescent milkshake and only wants to wear the ring to help her avoid feeling guilty.
asshole, look at the overal percentages not particular cases.
dumbfuck
you just made my point. Couldn't even post your precious statistics without calling me a name twice. I must have hit a button.
jackketch
2007-07-20, 19:12
Comment from BBC Radio 4' "Now Show" :
"If you want to wear a ring to show you aren't having sex...then get married like the rest of us!"
It is my mission in life to marry this bitch and fuck her.
The divorce proceedings will be filed after the sex.....
bahamadude91
2007-07-21, 20:08
if someone has to shout their faith out by wearing a ring, they arn't strong believers. if she really believed in abstinance, then she just wouldn't fuck ppl.
Kon-Foozed
2007-07-21, 20:22
Comment from BBC Radio 4' "Now Show" :
"If you want to wear a ring to show you aren't having sex...then get married like the rest of us!"
I heard the repeat of that episode today and it made me laugh.
I think the whole things a bit stupid over one ring, but 23 said it best. Religion is not defined by an item.
easeoflife22
2007-07-22, 01:05
The funny thing is that it explicitly says in the bible that you are not supposed to anounce your faith to anyone but God. No crosses, rings, etc. The reason is that your only doing it to recieve glory from those around you, instead of giving glory to God. Your also not supposed to pray in public, discuss your faith, or condemn or judge anyone. Christians are just a bunch of self-richeous phony's for the most part.
Edit: I had to add in that all women who wear these rings should be gang raped and exploited for monetary gain. She's probably gets fucked by her dad like most christian girls.
hitman legoff
2007-07-24, 04:41
Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if she's already saluted the incandescent milkshake and only wants to wear the ring to help her avoid feeling guilty.
I wouldn't bet against that.
TheMessiahComplex
2007-07-25, 01:13
Well if they don't let anyone else wear any other rings for any reason, then I guess this decision is fair.
Personally I think banning rings is a stupid idea to begin with, but if that's the rule, and they apply it across the board, then tough shit.
Now my question: why the hell did they ban jewelry in the first place? What incited that?
Now my question: why the hell did they ban jewelry in the first place? What incited that?
Yes, this is one of the things that pissed me off about the whole issue.
Hexadecimal
2007-07-25, 06:58
To bring people together as a whole we need to cut through the dogma that clouds our judgment.
Such is the case in France with the banning of religious articles in public.
Of course, some people think they may be excused because their god is the true god.
There are no exceptions here if we're to make this work.
Why let people use safety crutches? We'll ban their religious articles...but TVs, drugs, video games, sex, candies, desserts, massages, and all other comforts of life must be taken away!
Really Cathartic...what makes this dumb bitch's individualism less worthy of existence and practice than yours? Or are you just okay with behavioral assimilation?
For me, it's not a matter of delusion clouding judgment so much as it is the epitomized realization of Star Trek's 'Borg'...assimilation to the max. The world's moving towards one nation, one god, one ethics system, one uniform, one fucking everything. Have fun using your delusion free judgment to crunch numbers to earn some NWO dollars and take your NWO drugs while you travel from NWO America to NWO Europe while worshipping NWO Zod the Perfect, while watching some 'criminal' get beaten for disobeying the NWO law of cohesion...after all, he took off his NWO jumpsuit after he realized that EVERY FUCKING THING WAS THE GOD DAMNED SAME AFTER INDIVIDUALISM'S DEATH.
Individualism is not purely delusion...it's the one fucking thing in this world that makes life enjoyable. Individualism may drive delusions, but it also drives art, music, styles, creative energies...it's what separates us from computers. If a series of 1s and 0s gets you rock hard though, I suppose we know what you're in favor of. I hope you see the merit in what I say, even with the bits of exaggeration of lunatic humor. I hope you'll see the insanity of trying to 'cure' delusions...you can't get rid of social symptoms without ridding society of the cause - individualism drives everything right and wrong with the world...destroying that would eliminate wars, rapes, gunfights, extortion, and so on, but at the cost of everything that makes you fucking smile. If Hitler couldn't have existed as a monster, neither could have Da Vinci as an angel of creation.
Yin AND Yang...yin and yang.
Hexadecimal
2007-07-25, 07:02
Agreed ...although it seems your government is doing as much as it can to curtail that freedom.
But it is still one of many things I admire about the US (yes people you did read that right! There is much I think america has to proud of : McDonalds, muscle cars, The Right To Bear Arms, Microsoft to name but a few.)
I admire how the US is filled with apathetic people who bitch when taxes go up but haven't voted once in their 50 year lifespan. We're supposed to control our government. We gave them an inch...they took 17 miles and raped our grandmothers in their polyp infested assholes.
MasterPython
2007-07-26, 08:07
Thankfully America has the First Amendment and its presupposed "freedom of expression" idea.
Are we sure that this isn't a private school? I don't think the constitution applies to private organisations.