rustybolts
2007-10-08, 03:33
so the bible is compiled of a variety of books written by certain people at certain times throughout history. the chatholic church compiled the books into one collection, i.e. the bible, and by doing so left out some. what made these books not worthy to be in the bible, the so called word of God. if all parts of the bible are supposidly writen by God through men and not supposta be changed, then why were certain books left out? doesnt that seem kinda hypocritical?
another thing, how can someone say that they know their religion without reading all the parts of the bible. i wouldnt read only some chapters of a book and say that i read the whole book and call myself an expert. so i dont see how someone can only read parts of the bible and call themselves an expert.
i'm just tired of peole saying that they are a believer and devote themselves to something that they dont know the whole truth about.
another thing, how can someone say that they know their religion without reading all the parts of the bible. i wouldnt read only some chapters of a book and say that i read the whole book and call myself an expert. so i dont see how someone can only read parts of the bible and call themselves an expert.
i'm just tired of peole saying that they are a believer and devote themselves to something that they dont know the whole truth about.