Taken from the book:

SINS OF J-ESUS


Book 2 - Chapter 1


his pagan origin, homosexuality, and corrupt character


................................................

All Rights Reserved - Copyrighted 2007 - By Prophet Yahweh
................................................


.... inside this chapter...


Introduction

Who Is Esus?

Various Spellings Of Esus

Various Spellings Of J-Esus

Iesous Is The Greek Form Of Jesus

Iesus Is The Latin Form Of Jesus

Iesus Is Jesus Before The Letter "J" Came Into Existence


.................................................. .........................

INTRODUCTION

Here is an updated release that proves that when you pray to J-Esus, you are really praying to the Devil by his name Esus. Esus is the pagan, Satanic god of the Celtic Druids.

I still have to do a lot of work on it before it is ready to be published in book form.

But, it will be a book soon.

However, I wanted you to have a sneak preview of this study which has been updated.

The following are mainly on-line references that let us know that the god of Christianity is really a pre-Christian pagan or Satanic deity whose name was adopted into the newly formed European Christian faith as the modern name of our Messiah.

The Christians go crazy when you bring out this kind of information.

But, the thing about it is that you see the name of this pagan god in the given to the Christian messiah.

The pagan god's name is ESUS god of the satanic Druids, and when you look at the name JESUS, you see the name ESUS, and even Christians can not hide that fact.

Now, the question is, what in the world is a pagan/satanic god's name doing in a non-Hebrew name for the Messiah who spoke Hebrew/Aramaic as well as his people?

I know how this came to be, and with the blessings of YAHWEH, I will reveal more about this to all of you as time goes on.

Email this introductory information to all your friends and post it to all your groups.

To the Christians, I say, I have not lied, but you have!

Your leaders know that the name J-Esus is the name of the pagan, satanic god, Esus.

To all Christians I say, study the links and the statements below, from my research, and you will never ever look at the name J-Esus the same again.
From now on, every time you see the Christian god in it, you will see the pagan god ESUS in that name.

How can you avoid it?

It's staring you right in your face!

But, all humanity has been kept ignorant of who they and their: parents, children, loved ones, and friends are really worshiping in Christianity.
I am not saying the Messiah did not come, I am saying that he came, but his name could not have been J-Esus!

.................................................. ................................

WHO IS ESUS?

http://www.chronarchy.com/mjournal/patrons/aboutesus.html#1
http://www.chronarchy.com/mjournal/patrons/esus.html
http://www.chronarchy.com/mjournal/patrons/aboutesus.html
http://www.chronarchy.com/esus/eor_esus.html
http://www.geocities.com/chronarchy/mjournal/patrons/aboutesus.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esus
http://www.pantheon.org/articles/e/esus.html
http://www.draeconin.com/welsh/database/tarvos.htm
http://library.thinkquest.org/C0116903/mythology/gallic.htm
http://www.encyclopedia4u.com/e/esus.html
http://www.ancuairt.org/tumulus/esus.htm
http://holycall.com/biblemaps/ephesus.htm - (eph-esus) A Christian city named after Esus and is where the Ephesians came from that Paul wrote a book about.

.................................................

VARIOUS SPELLINGS OF ESUS

If you do a Google or Yahoo search for:

"Esus the pagan god"

You will be presented with many pages that have different spelling for Esus.
Some of those spellings are:

ESUS - http://www.chronarchy.com/esus/eor_esus.html - Encyclopedia of Religion Commentary on the satanic god Esus - A must read!

IESUS - http://www.answers.com/topic/iesus the Latin form of Jesus. There is no "J" in classical Latin.

HESUS - http://www.fromoldbooks.org/OldEngland//pages/0012-Gaulish-Deity.-Hesus/619x909-q75.html - a picture of Hesus the Gaulish god.

IHESUS - http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07421a.htm (paragraph 8) - The emblem or monogram representing the Holy Name of Jesus consists of the three letters: IHS. In the Middle Ages the Name of Jesus was written: IHESUS.

Here's another link to Hesus: http://www.answers.com/Hesus
IESOUS - http://www.answers.com/topic/iesous - Iesous (pronounced "ee-yay-soos") is the English way of writing the Greek name of J-Esus.

Regardless of the differences in spellings, the facts remain that they are talking about the same entity - the god of the Celtic Druids regardless how it's spelled: Esus,Iesus, Hesus, Ihesus, or Iesous.

.................................................. ........

VARIOUS SPELLINGS OF J-ESUS

Here are some of the different spellings of the Messiah's name:

JESUS - http://www.answers.com/topic/jesus-christ

YESHUA - http://www.answers.com/topic/yeshua - Yeshua, spelled ????????? in Hebrew, is believed by some scholars [1] and religious groups [2] to be the Hebrew or Aramaic name for Jesus. It is extensively used by Messianic Jews and Hebrew Christians, as well as others, who wish to use what some believe to be the original Hebraic pronunciation of Jesus' name. This pronunciation and spelling, as with many religious and scholarly issues remains the subject of ongoing debate.

YAHSHUA - http://www.answers.com/topic/yahshua - Yahshua is an attempted transliteration of the original Hebrew or Aramaic name of Jesus commonly used by individuals in the Sacred Name religious movement out of Christianity. Those who follow Sacred Name teachings (such as the Assemblies of Yahweh) believe that it is essential to salvation to use the correct pronunciation of the name of the one most Christians call "Jesus". It is believed that this is the correct transliteration of the Hebrew ????? (yod-he-waw-shin-ayin - usually transliterated as Y'hoshua or sometimes Yahoshua), which means "Yahweh is Salvation."

YAHOSHUA - http://www.walkinthelight.ca/Yehoshua_is_the_true_name_of_the_Messiah.htm -
Therefore, the reason the King James Version has "Jesus" in those two verses is because the Messiah's name is actually the same name as Joshua, Son of Nun... correctly pronounced "Yahoshua". It is quite evident that the modern form "Jesus" doesn't even remotely resemble the original name that the disciples were praying in, baptizing in and receiving so much criticism for preaching in.

YESHU - http://www.answers.com/Yeshu - Furthermore, the stories of Yeshu have been used both as proof of a historical Jesus and to discredit Christianity by claiming that Jesus is a myth based on confused memories of various individuals. There are currently at least three approaches to this question. Some argue that there is no relationship between Yeshu and the historical Jesus; some argue that Yeshu refers to the historical Jesus; some argue that Yeshu is a literary device used by Rabbis to comment on their relationship to and with early Christians.

Here is a link to a site that reveals how J-Esus is spelled in other languages:
http://www.angelfire.com/mt/ofolives/jcil.html

Also, here is a page on the various spellings of the name J-Esus:

http://www.seekgod.ca/htwhatsinaname.htm

None of these names are really the Messiah's true name. As time goes on, if you sign up to be my student, I will teach you what the Messiah's real name was. But, now is not the time to do so. Let's move on with the message of this email.

.................................................. .......

IESOUS IS THE GREEK FORM OF J-ESUS

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iesous - Iesous (pronounced "ee-yay-soos") is the English way of writing the Greek name of Jesus.

http://www.bibletexts.com/sh/hg/g5547.htm - Greek - Christos Iesous and Iesous Christos. In various places in the New Testament, the Greek text appears in either order, and both words always use the same case. For example, when either combination is used as the subject of the sentence, both words always are nominative, singular, masculine.

.................................................. .......

IESUS IS THE LATIN FORM OF J-ESUS

A.) In John 19:19-20, it states:

19 And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.

20 This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin. (KJV)

[The question now is: How is the Latin name for Jesus spelled?]

B.) http://www.angelfire.com/mt/ofolives/jcil.html [makes it clear that the Latin spelling for Jesus is spelled as Iesus in Latin. After you click on the link, above, scroll down the list of how Jesus' name is spelled in other languages until you get to the Latin spelling Iesus.]

C.) http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-greek/1998-December/003172.html - Latin IESUS to Latin JESUS (practice of carrying the first I of a word, which was almost always a consonantal I, above and below the lines resulted in differentiation of J representing I functioning as a consonant,
from the vowel I)...

D.) http://www.thenazareneway.com/names_and_titles_of_jesus.htm - Jesus is derived from the Latin Iesus, which in turn comes from the Greek Iesoûs.
back to the top

.................................................. .......

IESUS IS JESUS BEFORE THE LETTER "J" CAME INTO EXISTENCE

The letter J was originally an I as in Iesus/Jesus:

Concerning the letter "J," the Oxford English Dictionary states:
"J, the tenth letter of the alphabet in English and other languages, is, in its origin, a comparatively late modification of the letter I... In England, individual attempts to differentiate I and j were made already in the 16th century... But, though the differentiation of I and J, in form and value, was thus completed before 1640, the feeling that they were, notwithstanding, merely forms of the same letter continued for many generations... In dictionaries, the I and J words continue to be intermingled in one series down to the 19th c[entury}... Joddrell in 1820, Webster in 1828, separate I and J, as independent letters... No word beginning with J is of Old English derivation."

Also, in the World Book Encyclopedia, it states:

"J is the tenth letter of our alphabet, and was the last to be added. It developed. from the letter I... The ancient Greeks used the letter and passed it on to the Romans. In the late Middle Ages, when two or more i’s were written together, scribes often added a long tail to the last one. Later, the tail was used to indicate an initial I. During the 1600's an I at the beginning of a word was written with a tail. The J developed from these forms, and became a symbol for the consonant j, as in joy.

http://austin.indymedia.org/usermedia/application/7/What%5C's_In_a_Name.doc - El-Eusis translated into today’s English = “The Mighty One, Jesus” (who was Iesus before “J”).

.................................................. ..........

Please send this web page address to "ALL" your family, loved ones, and friends.

To receive more emails from me about this and other related
subjects, email me at:

prophetyahweh@...

GET THIS BOOK FOR "ALL" YOUR FAMILY AND LOVED ONES!

Don't let them be deceived like all other people are!

Sincerely Yours In Truth,

PROPHET YAHWEH
Seer of Yahweh
Master Salvation Teacher
Archenemy Of The New Testament Scribes
prophetyahweh@...

.................................................. ..........
the end

PROPHET YAHWEH
Seer of Yahweh
Master UFO Caller

Hello,

Here is a link to a very important book.

For some people, it is a hard read.

I can not express how important it is for you to down this book in the pdf and send it or the link to it to your group.

Also, let them know that it's also in the HTML format on different pages.

The title of the book is: "Crimes of Christianity," and I have linked the title to the Google search results for it, but incase it is corrupted, here is the direct link:

http://www.google.com/search?q=Crimes+of+Christianity&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Here is the link to the authors, G. W. Foote and Joseph Mazzini Wheeler:

http://www.ftarchives.net/foote/fbio.htm

You will see the link to the book at the top:

But, regardless, here is the book's direct on-line link:

http://www.ftarchives.net/foote/crimes/contents.htm

Here is the direct link to the pdf version:

http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf2html/pdf2html.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.quotedstatements .com%2FCrimesofChristianity.pdf&images=yes

Tell you group, that it would be great if you all read a chapter a day at the same time and discuss each chapter with each other so all of you will grow together.

I will send another book next.

Sincerely,

PY

PROPHET YAHWEH
Seer of Yahweh
Master UFO Caller


Here are the links to a stunning book:

A Must Read!

16 Crucified Saviors

Also, titled:

a. The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors
b. Sixteen Crucified Saviors

The online version of the book:

http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/kersey_graves/16/

Google's Search Result:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Sixteen+Crucified+Gods&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Sincerely Yours In YAHWEH's Holy Name,

Prophet

PROPHET YAHWEH
Seer of Yahweh
Master Salvation Teacher




Dear Subscribers,

I have mentioned how that the name Christ is really Christna or Chrishna, the god of the Hindus, in a disquised form.

Not only that, but both lives are almost identical.

Keep in mind that the Hindu's religion originated long before Christianity was invented by Constantine and the bishops of Rome.

So, if the lives of Chrishna and Christ are the same, the Christians had to have copied the life of Chrishna and blended it into their Christianity by applying it to their new god Christ.

As prove that when Christians invoke the name of their Christ, they are really calling on the devil, look at the comparison between the life of the demon Chrishna and the life of the so-called Christ.

.................................................. ..........


KERSEY GRAVES: THE WORLD'S 16 CRUCIFIED SAVIORS

Chapter 32: Three Hundred and Forty-Six Striking
Analogies Between Christ and Chrishna

THEIR MIRACULOUS HISTORY AND LEADING PRINCIPLES


The advent of each Savior was miraculously foretold by prophets.

The fallen and degenerate condition of the human race is taught in the religion of each.

A plan of restoration or salvation is provided for in each case.

A divine Savior is considered necessary in both cases.

The necessity of atoning for sin is taught in the religion of each.

A God, or Son of God, is selected as the victim for the atoning sacrifice in each case.

This God is sent down from heaven in each case in the form of a man.

The God or Savior in each case is the second person of the Trinity.

Chrishna, as well as Christ, was held to be really God incarnate.

The mission of each Savior is the same.

There is a resemblance in name -- Chrishna and Christ.

Chrishna, as well as Christ, was incarnated and born of a woman.

The mother in each case was a holy virgin.

The same peculiarities of a miraculous conception and birth are related of each.

Each had an adopted earthly father.

The father of Chrishna, as well as that of Christ, was a carpenter.

God is claimed as the real father in both cases.

A Spirit or Ghost was the author of the conception of each.

There was rejoicing on earth when each Savior was born.

There was also joy in heaven at the birth and advent of each.

Chrishna, as well as Christ, was of royal descent.

Their mothers were both reputedly pious women.

The names of two mothers are somewhat similar -- Mary and Maia.

Each had a special female friend -- Elizabeth in the one case, and the wife of Nanda in the other.

Neither Savior was born in a house, but both in obscure situations.

Both were born on the 25th of December.

Both, at birth, were visited by wise men and shepherds.

The visitors were conducted by a star in each case.

The rite of purification was observed by the mothers of each.

An angel warns of impending danger in each case.

The incumbent ruler was hostile in each case.

A bloody decree in each case for the destruction of the infant Savior.

A flight of the parents takes place in both cases.

The parents of one sojourned at Muturea, the other at Mathura.

Each Savior had a forerunner -- John the Baptist in one case, Bali Rama in the other.

Both were preternaturally smart in childhood.

Each disputed with and vanquished learned opponents.

Both became objects of search by their parents.

And both occasioned anxiety, if not sorrow, to their parents.

The mother of each had other children -- that is children begotten by man as well as God.

Both Saviors retired to, and spent considerable time in the wilderness.

The religious rite of "fasting" was practiced by each Savior.

Each delivered a noteworthy sermon, or series of moral lessons.

Chrishna, as well as Christ, was called and considered God.

Each was both God and the Son of God (so regarded).

"Savior" was one of the divine titles of each.

Each was designated "the Savior of man," "the Savior of the world," &c.

Both expressed a desire to "save all."

Each sustained the character of a Messiah.

Chrishna, as well as Christ, was a Redeemer.

Each Savior was called "Shepherd."

Both were believed to be the Creator of the world.

Each is sometimes spoken of, also, as only an agent in the creation.

Both were the "Light and Life" of men.

Each "brought life and immortality to light."

Both are represented as "the seed of the woman bruising the serpent's head."

Was Christ a "Dispenser of grace," so was the Hindoo Savior.

One was "the lion of the tribe of Judah," the other "the lion of the tribe of Saki."

Christ was "the Beginning of the End," Chrishna "the Beginning, the Middle, and the End."

Both proclaimed, "I am the Resurrection."

Each was "the way to the Father."

Both represented emblematically "the Sun of Righteousness."

Each is figuratively represented as being "all in all."

Both speak of having existed prior to human birth.

A dual existence -- an existence in both heaven and earth at once -- is claimed by or for both.

Chrishna, as well as Christ, was "without sin."

Both assumed the divine prerogative of forgiving sins.

The mission of each was to deliver from sin.

Both came to destroy the devil and his works.

The doctrine of the "atonement" is practically realized in each case.

Each made a voluntary offering for the sins of the world.

Both were human as well as divine.

Chrishna, as well as Christ, was worshiped as God absolute.

Each was regarded as "the Lord from Heaven."

Chrishna, as well as Christ, had applied to him all the attributes of God.

Was Christ omniscient, so was Chrishna.

Was one omnipotent, so was the other (so believed).

And both are represented as being omnipresent.

Each was believed to be divinely perfect.

Was one "Lord of lords," so was the other.

Each embodied the "power and wisdom of God."

All power was committed unto each (so claimed).

Chrishna performed many miracles as well as did Christ.

One of the first miracles of each was the cure of a leper.

Each healed "all manner of diseases."

The work of casting out devils constitutes a part of the mission of each.

Each practically proved his power to raise the dead.

A miracle appertaining to a tree is related of both.

Both could read the thoughts of the people.

The power to detect and eject evil spirits was claimed by both.

Both had the keys or control of death.

Each led an extraordinary life.

Each had a character for supernatural greatness.

Both possessed or claimed a oneness with the Father.

A "oneness with his Lord and Master" is claimed, also, for the disciples of each.

A strong reciprocal affection between Master and disciple in each case.

Each offers to shoulder the burdens of his disciples.

A portion of the life of each was spent in preaching.

Both made converts by their miracles and preaching.

A numerous retinue of believers springs up in each case.

Both had commissioned apostles to proclaim their religion.

Each was an innovator upon the antecedent religion.

A beautiful reform in religion was inaugurated by each Savior.

Each opposed the existing popular priesthood.

Both abolished the law of lineal descent in the ancient priesthood.

Each was an object of conspiracy by his enemies.

Humility and external poverty distinguished the life of each.

Each denounced riches and rich men, and loathed and detested wealth.

Both had a character for meekness.

Chastity or unmarried life was a distinguishing characteristic of each.

Mercy was a noteworthy characteristic of each.

Both were censured for associating with sinners.

Each was a special friend to the poor.

A poor widow woman receives marked attention by each.

Each encounters a gentile woman at a well.

Both submitted unresistingly to injuries and insults.

General practical philanthropy and impartiality marks the life of each Savior.

Each took more pleasure in repentant sinners than in virtuous saints.

Both practically disclosed God's attempt to reconcile the world to himself.

The closing incidents in the earth-life of each were strikingly similar.

A memorable last supper marked the closing career of both.

Both were put to death by "wicked hands."

Chrishna, as well as Christ, was crucified.

Darkness attended the crucifixion of each.

Both were crucified between two thieves.

Each is reported to have forgiven his enemies.

The age of each at death corresponds (being between thirty and thirty-six years).

Each, after giving up the ghost, descends into hell.

The resurrection from the dead is a marked period in the history of each.

Each ascends to heaven after his resurrection.

Many people are reported to have witnessed the ascension in each case.

Each is reported as having both descended and ascended.

The head of each, while living on earth, was anointed with oil.

DOCTRINES

There is a similarity in the doctrines of their respective religions.

The same doctrines are propagated by the disciples of each.

The doctrine of future rewards and punishments is a part of each system.

Analogous views of heaven are found in each system.

A third heaven is spoken of in each system.

All sin must be punished according to the bible teachings of each.

Each has a hell provided for the wicked.

Both teach a hell of darkness and a hell of light.

An immortal worm finds employment in the hell of each system ("the worm that dieth not.")

The arch-demon of the under world uses brimstone for fuel in one case, and oil in the other.

The motive for future punishment is in both cases the same.

Each has a purgatory or sort of half-way house.

Special divine judgments on nations are taught by each.

A great and final day of judgment is taught by each.

A general resurrection also is taught in each religion.

That there is a "Judge of the dead" is a doctrine of each.

Two witnesses are to report on human actions in the final assizes.

We are furnished in each case with the dimension of heaven or "the holy city."

Man is enjoined to strive against temptation to sin by each.

And repentance for sin is a doctrine taught by the bible of each.

Each has a prepared city for a paradise.

The bibles of both teach that we have no continuing city here.

Souls are carried to heaven by angels, as in the instance of Lazarus, in each case.

A belief in angels or spirits is a tenant of each religion.

The doctrine of fallen or evil angels is found in both system.

Obsession by wicked or evil spirits is taught by each.

Both teach that sickness or disease is caused by evil spirits.

Each has a king-devil or arch-demon with a posse of subalterns or evil spirits.

Both bibles record the story of a "hellaballoo" or war in heaven.

Both teach that an evil man can neither do nor speak a good thing.

Both teach that sin is a disadvantage in the present life as well as in the future.

The doctrine of free will or free agency is taught by each.

Predestination seems to be inferentially taught by each.

In each case man is a prize in a lottery, with God and the devil for ticket-holders.

Both make the devil (or devils) a scapegoat for sin.

Both teach that the devil or evil spirits as the primary cause of all evil.

The destiny of both body and soul is pointed out by each.

The true believers are known as "saints" under both systems.

Saints with "white robes" are spoken of by each.

Both specify "the Word of Logos" as God.

Wisdom, too, is personified as God by the holy Scriptures of each.

Both teach that God may be known by his works.

The doctrine of one supreme God is taught in each bible.

Light and truth are important words in the religious nomenclature of each.

Both profess a high veneration for truth.

"Where the treasure is, there is the heart also," is taught by each.

"Seek and ye shall find" is a condition prescribed by each.

Religious toleration is a virtue professed by both.

All nations are professedly based on an equality by each.

Both, however, enjoin partiality to "the household of faith."

The doors of salvation are thrown open to high and low, rich and poor, by each.

Each professes to have "the only true and saving faith."

There is a mystery in the mission of each Savior.

"Rama" is a well known word in the bible of each.

"The understanding of the wise" is a phrase in each.

Both speak figuratively of "the blind leading the blind."

"A new heaven and a new earth" is spoken of by each.

The doctrine of a Trinity in the Godhead is taught by each.

Bptism by water is a tenant and ordinance of each.

"Living water" is a metaphor found in each.

Baptism by fire seems also to be recognized by each.

Fasting is emphatically enjoined by each.

Sacrifices are of secondary importance in each system, and are partially or wholly abandoned by each.

The higher law is paramount to ceremonies in each religion.

The bible of each religion literally condemns idolatry.

Both also make concessions to idolatry.

Polygamy is not literally encouraged nor openly condemned by either.

The power to forgive sins is conferred on the disciples of each.

The doctrine of blasphemy is recognized by each.

Pantheism, or the reciprocal 'in-being' of God in nature and nature in God, is taught by both.

BIBLES AND HOLY SCRIPTURES

Each has a bible which is the idolized fountain of all religious teaching.

Both have an Old Testament and a New Testament, virtually.

The New Testament inaugurates a new and reform system of religion in each case.

"All Scripture is given by inspiration of God" is the faith of the disciples of each.

Each system claimed to have its inspired men to write its scriptures.

Both hold a spiritual qualification necessary to understand their bibles.

It is a sin to become "wise beyond what is written" in their respective bibles.

Both recommend knowing the Scriptures in youth.

Alteration of their respective bibles is divinely interdicted.

The bible is an infallible rule of faith and practice in both cases.

"ll scripture is profitable for doctrine" is the faith of each.

Both explain away the errors of their bibles.

SPIRITUALITY OF THE TWO RELIGIONS

The religion of Chrishna is pre-eminently spiritual no less than Christ's.

Both teach that "to be carnally minded is death."

External rites are practically dispensed within each religion.

The spiritual law written on the heart is recognized by each.

"God is within you," Buddhists teach as well as Christians.

Both recognize an invisible spiritual Savior.

"God dwells in the heart," say Hindoo as well as Christians.

Inward recognition of the divine law is amply seen in both.

Both confess allegiance to an inward monitor.

The doctrine of inspiration and internal illumination is found in both.

The indwelling Comforter is believed in by both.

Both also teach that religion is an inward work.

Both speak of being born again -- i.e., the second birth.

A spiritual body is also believed in by both.

"Spiritual things are incomprehensible to the natural man" say each.

God's spiritually sustaining power Buddhists also acknowledge.

Both give a spiritual interpretation to their bibles.

Each has a new and more interior law superseding the old law.

The spiritual cross -- self-denial or asceticism -- is a prominent feature of each religion.

The duty of renouncing and abandoning the external world is solemnly enjoined by each.

Buddhists renounce the world more practically than Christians.

Withdrawal or seclusion from society is recommended by each.

Bodily suffering as a benefit to the soul is encouraged by each.

Voluntary suffering for righteousness' sake is a virtue with each.

The cross is a religious emblem in each system.

Both glory in "the religion of the cross" as better than a religion without suffering.

Hence both teach "the greater the cross the greater the crown."

Earthly pleasures are regarded as evil by both.

Contempt for the body as an enemy to the soul is visible in both.

Retirement for religious contemplation is a duty with each.

The forsaking of relations is also enjoined by each.

Spiritual relationship is superior to external relationship with both.

"To die is great gain" we are taught by each.

A subjugation of the passions is a religious duty with each.

The road to heaven is a narrow one with each.

The same state of religious perfection is aspired to by the disciples of each.

THE DOCTRINE OF FAITH OR BELIEF

Faith is an all-important element and doctrine with each.

Heresy, or want of faith, is a sin of great magnitude with both.

Faith in the Savior is a condition to salvation by both.

Confessing the Savior is also required in both cases.

"Believe or be damned" is the condition or 'profess' to believe the terrible 'sine qua non' to salvation by each.

Skeptics or unbelievers are with both the chief of sinners.

"Faith can remove mountains," either with a Buddhist or a Christian.

Both contrast faith with works.

Faith without works is dead -- so teach both Buddhists and Christians.

THE DOCTRINE AND PRACTICE OF PRAYER

Prayer is an important rite in each religion.

Private or secret prayer is recommended by both.

Each has also a formula of prayer.

"Pray without ceasing" is a Buddhist as well as a Christian injunction.

Praying to their respective Saviors in sickness and in health is a custom with both.

The custom of praying for the dead is recognized in each system.

TREATMENT OF ENEMIES

It is a Hindoo as well as a Christian injunction to treat enemies kindly.

Passive submission to injuries and abuse is enjoined by both.

The holy Scriptures of both require us to pray for enemies, and feed them.

And even love to enemies is a part of the spirit of each religion.

THE MILLENNIUM

Hindoos, like Christians, prophesy of a great millennial era.

There is a remarkable similarity in their notions with respect to it.

Both anticipate a second advent or new Savior on the occasion.

The destruction of the world also is to take place in both cases.

And an entire renovation and a new order of things are to be established in each case.

MIRACLES

There is almost a constant display of miraculous power in each system.

The disciples of both are professedly endowed with this power.

Miraculous cures of the lame, the blind, and the sick are reported in both cases.

Miracles of handling poisonous reptiles with impunity are reported by both.

Swallowing deadly poison is enjoined by Christians and practiced by Hindoos.

Many cases of the miraculous ejection of devils are reported by both.

The miracle of thought-reading is displayed by both.

The saints in both cases are reported as raising the dead.

PRECEPTS

"The kingdom of heaven" was to be sought first of all things in each case.

Love to God is a paramount obligation under each system.

And the worship of God is an essential requisition in each religious polity.

"Cease to do evil and learn to do well" is virtually enjoined by each.

All inward knowledge of God is taught as essential by both systems.

A reliance on works is discouraged by both.

Purity of heart is inculcated by Hindoos as well as Christians.

Speak and think evil of no man is a gospel injunction of each.

A love of all beings is more prominently the spirit of Buddhism than that of Christianity.

The practice of strict godly virtue is enjoined by both.

Moderation and temperance are recommended by both.

Patience is a virtue in each religion.

The duty of controlling our thoughts is taught by each.

Charity has a high appreciation by each.

Both make the poor objects of attention.

The practice of hospitality is recommended by each.

Humility is a duty and a virtue under both systems.

Mirthfulness or light conversation is forbidden by each.

Purity of life is a duty with Hindoos as well as Christians.

Chasteness in conversation is inculcated by both.

"Respect to persons" is a sin in the moral polity of both.

Alms-giving is religiously enjoined by the holy Scriptures of both.

Both teach that "it is better to give than to receive."

Loyalty to rulers is a moral requisition of each system.

Honor to father and mother is esteemed a great virtue by both.

The correct training of children is with each a scriptural duty.

"Look not upon a woman" is more than hinted by each.

The reading of the holy Scriptures is enjoined by both.

Lying or falsehood is with each a sin of great magnitude.

Swearing is discountenanced by both religions.

Theft or stealing is specially condemned by both.

Both deprecate and condemn the practice of war.

Both discountenance fighting.

Neither of them professes to believe in slavery.

Drunkenness and the use of wine are more specifically condemned by the Hindoo religion.

Adultery and fornication are heinous sins in the eyes of both.

Both condemn covetousness as a great sin.

Buddhists more practically condemn anger than Christians do.

MISCELLANEOUS ANALOGIES

.

Both have their apocryphal as well as their canonical Scriptures.

Stories are found in the bible of each which would be rejected if found elsewhere.

Both make their bible a finality in matters of faith.

Both have had their councils and commentaries to reveal their bibles over again.

Numerous schisms, divisions, sects, and creeds have sprung up in each.

Various religious reforms have sprung up under each.

Conversion from one religious sect to another is common to both.

Both religions have been troubled with numerous skeptics or infidels.

Both have often resorted to new interpretations for their bibles to suit the times.

The unconverted are stigmatized by each.

"Knock and it shall be opened" is the invitation of each.

Public confession of sins in class-meetings is known to each.

Death-bed repentance often witnessed under both religions systems.

A belief in haunted houses incident to the religious countries of both.

A superior respect for woman claimed by each.

An idolatrous veneration for religious ancestors by each.

Each sustain a numerous horde of expensive priests.

A divine call or illumination to preach claimed by each.

Religious martyrdom the glory of each.

Both have encountered "perils by sea and land" for their religion.
He who loseth his life (for his religion) shall find it, say both.

Both in ancient times suffered much persecution.

The disciples of both have suffered death without flinching from the faith.

Each sent numerous missionaries abroad to preach and convert.

And, finally, each cherished the hope of converting the world to their religion.

HOW JESUS AND CHRIST BECAME
THE CHRISTIAN MESSIAH’S NAME



FOREWORD

All ancient nations had religious systems and were ruled by the influence of their priesthood. From Julius Caesar to Constantine the Roman Emperors had allowed the conquered countries to continue their own religions. This went on until the discordant waves of the religious systems of the east and the west impacted at Rome in rioting.

The two chief Gods of the day were the Hindu Krishna of the east and the Druidic God Hesus of the west. The deceived people knew not that both had originated as Sun Gods and were worshipped’ as such for centuries before the cunning priesthood had slyly transformed them into persons.

The bishops of Krishna grew worried by the wave of increasing doubt and skepticism regarding Krishna that filtered into the rank and file of their followers from the supporters of Hesus.

Each faction proclaimed that its God was the oldest and the only true God. By 324 A.D. the strife had grown so serious that vigorous action was necessary to establish a more peaceful religious state.

This was the religious condition of the Roman Empire in the 4th Century A.D., some 300 years after the alleged death of the gospel Jesus, who is quoted by the biblical scribe as saying:

“And I (Jesus) say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I’ll build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matt. 16:18).

But the facts show that “the gates of hell” were giving “my church” great trouble; and that’s another reason why all the history of the ancient world was destroyed by decree of the Church, and new history written that omits the facts which Church wanted to hide from the people.

These damaging historical conditions were known to and presented by one Eunomius, the great Arius leader, 200 years after the Nicean Council; and they shocked the Christian World.

The church could not allow the damaging revelations of Eunomius to be even remotely known. So by “holy decree” the powerful priesthood of Rome took steps to destroy forever all traces of the proceedings of the Nicean Council contained in his writings, and also the writings of all Christians who attempted to refute his charges.

The facts presented by Eunomius explained the manner in which the Roman State Church was founded in the 4th century, and how its God, Jesus Christ was invented.

Truth cannot forever be concealed. Despite the efforts of the Church to hide its fraudulent foundation, the facts of its mythical Jesus, and stifle the opposition, the day came when archeologists dug from ancient ruins the glaring evidence which exposed the black fraud that amazed the world.

Justice may slumber long, but it always awakens and retribution follows. Truth may be buried ever so deeply, but the time comes when its glorious rays burst forth with resistless power, striking terror to the hearts of the fraudulent.

The burning question which the Nicean Council was called to settle, was whether the Hindu Krishna should prevail over the Druidic Hesus, or whether both should be worshipped accordingly, or whether they should be united and molded into one God.

Constantine first tried to settle the argument by proposing the adoption of both Gods. This policy failed, and the arguments of the bishops finally became so hostile between the two factions, that Constantine summoned the leading bishops of the sects to meet in council at Nicea and consider the matter.

Constantine was wise enough to have the council convene at Nicea, in the Roman province of Bithynia , in Asia Minor, so the people of Rome would have no knowledge of its real purpose. It is said that the council convened in May and ended in August, 325. But others say the struggle was so fierce in that Christian Council that it extended into September.

The fragments of history on the subject, and letters written by those who attended the council, indicate that some 1800 bishops were present.

Sabinus, bishop of Heraclea, in his letter to a friend, stated that with the exception of Constantine and Eusebius of Caesarea, the 300 bishops who finally voted in favor of Constantine’s scheme to unite the names of the two chief Gods were “a set of illiterate, simple men who understood nothing much,” to quote his words.

And it was these ignorant prelates, subject to all kinds of motives, to fear of being branded heretics, their desire to agree with the Emperor and win his favor, anxiety to close the angry proceedings, that finally, by their votes, decided under duress that the world should accept and receive the name of the New God who would lead the new Religious System known as Christianity (Rhys, p. 67).

And that is the way the gospel Jesus was born.

Of the 1800 bishops present, only 300 supported Constantine ’s scheme on the first vote. This made Constantine furious. The leader of the opposition was one Arius. His faction prepared a declaration of their objection and presented it to the Council. Constantine ’s supporters tore it to shreds. And so great was the uproar raised in this Holy Christian Council, that Constantine had to call on his Roman Guards to restore order.

Then with the support of the Emperor and his armed guards, his faction rose up and excommunicated Arius and all of his followers. They were taken from the chamber by the Roman Guards; and by edict of Constantine , Arius was sent into exile.

After Arius and his 1500 supporters had been driven from the Council, Constantine ’s scheme was presented to the 300 bishops who had originally supported it, and it received unanimous approval.

That’s how Christendom got its Christ Jesus, savior of the world who “washed us from our sins in his own blood” (Rev. 1:5).

Prof. Hilton Hotema
In His 88th Year

Honolulu, 1965

WAS J-ESUS A HOMOSEXUAL?

This work is Part 1 of an abbreviated, condensed study of how the New Testament scribes, who wrote the Gospels, suggested that Jesus was a homosexual.

The entire work, that presents all suggestions of Jesus' homosexuality, will be presented only to those who sign up to be my students.

In Part 2 of "Was Jesus A Homosexual?" there will be even more shocking suggestions of Jesus being a homosexual that were made by the Gospel writers.

I will send it to you in 2 or 3 days.

In the section below on John 13:4-5, I will present the first round of scriptures which prove that evil, sinister scribes of the New Testament Gospels suggested that our Messiah was a homosexual.

Keep in mind that I will be using the King James version of the bible in this study.

The King James Verison has been around since the year 1611. It has been the main bible used by English speaking people for the last 400 years.

However, over the last 50 years, there has been an explosion of different translations of the bible!

Many of the translators of these new versions of the bible are removing or re-writing the homosexual references and other things they don¢t want people to know.

They want scriptures to read the way they want them to instead of how they were originally written.

Even so, in these new bibles, you can still see the homosexual hints attributed to Jesus but, in most versions, not as clearly as in the King James.

Because of this, don¢t be surprised when you tell people some of these verses and they tell you that those scriptures don't read the same as they do in the different versions of the bible they use.

It will do you good to research how these verses are translated in versions other than the King James so you will better understand how to present and explain what the Gospel scribes have done.

Now, let's take a look at some of the places where the New Testament scribes suggested that Jesus was a homosexual.

.................................................. .........................


JOHN 13:4-5

John chapter 13 describes the events of the Passover dinner when Jesus washed his disciples feet.

In verse 4-5, it states:

4. "He riseth from supper, and laid aside his garments; and took a towel, and girded himself."

5. "After that he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples¢ feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded."

The average Christian would not see anything wrong with these verses. To them Jesus was simply demonstrating an act of humility by washing his disciples¢ feet.

But, what most of them won¢t see is that when scriptures said that our Messiah "laid aside his garments," it meant that he took off his clothes! And, without making a distinction, this suggests that he took off his clothes in front of his disciples, as if while they watched.

If this was the case, it was an improper thing for a man to do before other men, especially a holy man before his disciples. The reason why is because it disrespects the brotherhood and shows a lack of judgement and consideration on the Messiah¢s part.

Also, when John 13:4 says that he "took a towel, and girded himself," this suggests that the rest of his body was left uncovered or naked.

Now, let me bring your attention to when John 13:4-5 said that after Jesus undressed, before his disciples, "he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples¢ feet."

Just think. A "basin" is really not that big. One person can easily carry it. And, a man does not have to take off his clothes to fill it up with water and wash peoples' feet no more than the people who got their feet washed did not take off their clothes for it to be done!

The writers of the Gospels want us to believe that our Messiah took his clothes and got naked before other men, to fill up a basin with water, so he could wash their feet. But, common sense should tell you that it was not necessary at all for him to take off his clothes to do this!

Where are the scribes taking us after telling us this unlikelihood?

Let's see.

Verse 5 tells us that after he finished washing their feet, he wiped them dry "with the towel wherewith he was girded."

Now, since our Messiah wrapped the towel around his waist, which covered his sexual organs, then to use that towel to dry his disciples¢ feet suggests that he was so naked before them that they could see his sexual organs!

There¢s something wrong with this picture.

I wonder what was on the Messiah¢s mind when he ended up completely naked with his disciples able to see his penis and testicles?

I wonder what his disciples thought when he ended up naked with his sexual organs before their eyes, while they were fully clothed, as he was drying their feet.

I wonder what he thought they were thinking when they saw him naked with his penis before them?

I wonder if the thoughts of Jesus having a small or large penis came across the minds of any of his disciples when they saw it?

Regardless, let¢s read on so we can see where this story goes.

.................................................. .........................


JOHN 13:12, 15

12. "So after he had washed their feet, and had taken his garments, and was set back down again, he said unto them, Know ye what I have done to you?

15. "For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you."

Based on this order he gave to his disciples, they knew that they would have to take turns getting naked before each other and wash each other¢s feet, with their penises in plain view, like Jesus did.

I am certain, that the disciples with small penises wished that the other disciples did not have to see how small their penises were.

All this does not sound right even to most Christians. This is why when they perform this rite today, many of them choose to disobey Jesus¢ order and leave their clothes on!

Men taking off their clothes before each other is also wrong in the eyes of YAHWEH!

In Genesis 3:21, it states:

"Unto Adam also and to his wife did YAHWEH make coats of skins, and clothed them."

From that point on, YAHWEH intended for Adam, Eve, and all their descendants to be dressed before each other, at all times, except when they were intimate with their mates.

Also, since Jesus is said to be of the high priest order (Hebrews 8:1, which states: "...we have such a high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens..."), he was to be very careful for his nakedness not to be seen.

The reason why is because of YAHWEH¢s laws concerning the nakedness of the high priests found in Exodus 20:25-26. In these verses, it states:

25. "And if thou wilt make me an altar of stone, thou shalt not build it of hewn stone: for if thou lift up thy tool upon it, thou hast polluted it.

26. "Neither shalt thou go up by steps unto mine altar, that thy NAKEDNESS be not discovered [seen] thereon."

Judging by these scriptures, we see that it is improper, in YAHWEH¢s eyes, for men to do anything of a religious nature whereby their nakedness is seen.

Now consider what the scribes wrote that our Messiah said in John 8:28-29:

28. "as my Father hath taught me, I speak those things"

29. "for I do always those things that please him."

Well, for someone to write that our Messiah opposed YAHWEH¢s clothing laws by taking off his clothes before other men and ordering his disciples to do the same, has to be a lie against our Messiah!

The reason why is because, he would have known that YAHWEH did not teach him or anyone else to do so, and it would not have pleased YAHWEH for him to go against His Old Testament laws based on John 8:28-29 above!

Now, the question arises:

What has all this to do with the Gospel scribes suggesting that Jesus was a homosexual?

To find out, just keep reading.


.................................................. .........................


JOHN 13:23-25

23. "Now there was leaning on Jesus¢ bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved."

24. "Simon Peter therefore beckoned to him, that he should ask who it should be of whom he spake."

25. "He then lying on Jesus breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it?"

Take a close look at these verses. In them, you see an act between men which is improper and unnatural!

Please consider YAHWEH¢s laws against homosexuality in Leviticus 20:13. It says:

"13. If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."

Now, consider Micah 7:5, which says:

"...keep the doors of thy mouth from her that lieth in thy bosom."

And, judging by this verse, only a woman is allowed to lie in a man¢s bosom and not another man!

Now, what have we here?

The New Testament scribes are portraying our Messiah as violating YAHWEH in this matter!

How, you may ask?

By allowing one of his male disciples to lie in his bosom which is only to be done with a woman!

Now, this is sin and evil!

What about the words attributed to our Messiah in John 8:28-29 when he said:

"... as my Father hath taught me, I speak those things," and "I do always those things that please him"?

How in the world does he allowing a man to lie in his bosom please YAHWEH?

It does not please YAHWEH it displeases Him!

Now, let¢s do a verse-by-verse break down of John 13:23-25.

23. "Now there was LEANING on Jesus¢ bosom on of his disciples, whom Jesus loved."

According to verse 23, one of the disciples was "leaning" on the "bosom" of Jesus. The word "leaning" suggest that the disciple was in some kind of upright position. The word "bosom" means the chest or breast of Jesus.

If a disciple was "leaning" on Jesus¢ "bosom," chest, or breast, the only way this can happen is if he was in between Jesus¢ arms!

Now, let us use our imagination to visualize the most likely positions this verse suggest Jesus was in with his disciple:

1. Visualize both of them standing with one man "LEANING" on the other¢s chest while between his arms.

Does this seem right to you?

2. Visualize one man sitting in a chair, with the other man sitting on his lap and "LEANING" on his chest while between his arms.

Does this seem right to you?

3. Visualize both men sitting on a flat surface, like a floor or bed, with one of them sitting on the other man¢s lap or between the other¢s legs and "LEANING" on the other¢s chest while between his arms.

Does this seem right to you?

4. Visualize one man sitting in a chair with the other man standing between his legs and "LEANING" on his chest while in between his arms.

Does this seem right to you?

Hey, it most certainly should not seem right to you!

The reason why is because this example results in the man¢s sexual organs (who is "LEANING" on Jesus chest while standing between his legs) being only inches away from Jesus' mouth if Jesus is sitting in a chair!

Regardless, how a person interprets this verse about the disciple "leaning" on Jesus' chest, the fact remains that this is an intimate encounter we¢re seeing here!

Now consider that John 13:23-25 also make the following suggestions:

1. the man who was intimate with Jesus was a homosexual playing the role of a woman

2. that Jesus was a homosexual who was acting like his male lover was a woman

3. that both Jesus and his disciple were homosexuals who often had oral and anal sex with each other

4. that the other disciples of Jesus were accustomed to them having homosexual relations while they watched because they did not react, at all, as if it was normal for them to see Jesus' and his lover behaving in a homosexual way

5. at least one or more of the other disciples had to wonder which one of them would be the next one Jesus would want to perform oral sex on or penetrate anally

6. that Jesus and all of the disciples were a bunch of sick men!

These suggestions are totally unnatural!

This is evil!

This is perverted!

YAHWEH is against homosexuality! He destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because of it!

(Read Genesis chapter 18 and 19)

And, now, what have we here?

What we have here are fraudulent sections of the Christian New Testament Gospels, written by demonic scribes, that portray our Messiah as a homosexual who had a man being intimate with him in a way that only a woman should do!

We saw, above, that Jesus got naked with his disciples to the point that his penis and testicles could be seen by them.

And, now we see, that, afterward, he allowed one of them "leaning," intimately, between his arms, upon his chest.

Normally, when this happens between two people, the one with the person "leaning" upon his chest, between his arms, usually has at least one of his arms around that person!

Now, let¢s break down the following verses and see the suggestions they make!

24. "Simon Peter therefore beckoned to him, that he should ask who it should be of whom he spake."

Here in verse 24 of John chapter 13, we see where Simon Peter signaled to the disciple "leaning" between Jesus¢ arms, upon his chest, for him to find out who Jesus was talking about.

Now, what does this suggest?

Simon Peter must have felt that this disciple had a greater power, than he did, at finding out who Jesus was talking about or he would have asked Jesus himself.

So, he signaled to the disciple who was between Jesus arms, to find out who Jesus was talking about. This suggests that this person had a strange power over Jesus like a woman does with a man who is in love with her.

Or was the power like that which a feminine male homosexual has over a masculine male homosexual that is in love with him?

Regardless, it was sick and demented!

Consider the next verse of John 13:

25. "He then LYING on Jesus breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it?"

We saw, in verse 23, that the disciple was "leaning" upright on Jesus' chest. Now, in verse 25, it says that he was "lying" on his breast.

This suggests that the intimacy involved became even more intimate!

This also suggests that after Simon Peter signaled him to find out who Jesus was talking about, the disciple started seducing Jesus, like a woman does a man who she wants something from, and he ended up lying on top of him as if for sex!

Finally, this also suggests that the disciples were watching while the man was seducing Jesus!

All this proves that I am correct when I say that the Gospels suggest that Jesus was a homosexual!

Our Messiah could not have been a homosexual!

He never would have desire having oral and anal sex with a man.

Neither could he have been so twisted, in the mind, that he fell in love with another man like he would have done with a woman.

In Part 2 of "Was Jesus A Homosexual?" there will be even more "shocking" suggestions of Jesus being a homosexual made by the Gospel writers.

I will send it to you in 2 or 3 days.

1.) The Love Teachings Of J-Esus

2.) J-Esus Taught Two Men In One Bed
Is Allowed In Christianity

3.) Was J-Esus Having Sex With His Boy
When Captured By Romans?

4.) Did J-Esus Resurrect To Stop Sex
Between His Lover And Disciples?

5.) Did J-Esus Have Sexual Relationships With His Initiates?

6.) Was J-Esus' Lover A Man Or A Woman?

7.) Homosexuals Believe J-Esus Was Gay Like Them

8.) Christian Picture That Suggests Jesus Let Young Boys Perform Oral Sex On Him Like The Gospels Suggest He Did With His Those Who Sought To Be His Disciples?

.................................................. .......................



1.) THE LOVE TEACHINGS OF J-ESUS

When I began to research the different types of love the evil Gospel scribes say the Christian Jesus taught people, I realized that they fit into the following main categories:

a.) love for the Creator
b.) love for Jesus
c.) love for people in general
d.) the disciples' love for each other

Upon further examination, I noticed another type of love attributed to Jesus. At first glance, this love seems so innocent. But, when all the verses concerning it are analyzed, we see that the Gospels actually suggest Jesus was a homosexual who loved other men!

This proves that the Gospels tells lies on our Messiah! It's no way for him to be possessed with the unnatural, nasty, and perverted love of homosexuality!
When you research what sexual acts constitute homosexuality, mainly oral and anal sex, you'll see that they consist of the same acts the priests of J-Esus are perpetrating upon our children today.

Let's take a look at some of these scriptures that reveal the unnatural love that the scribes wrote our Messiah had towards other men.

.................................................. ...................


2.) J-ESUS TAUGHT TWO MEN IN ONE BED IS ALLOWED IN CHRISTIANITY


Oh, no!

Here the Gospel scribes go again!

In this section, let's take a look at how the demonic writers of the gospels continue to portray our Messiah as a homosexual, every chance they get, in their fraudulent so-called Gospels.

They go on and on and on subliminally implanting the homosexual view of Jesus in your mind when you read their writings.

Take a look at how these devils, from hell, show J-Esus teaching people to accept homosexuality in very innocent looking ways.

In Luke 17:34, it states that:

34. I tell you in the night their shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.

Do you realize what this is saying?

Two men in one bed!

Man, this violates the laws of YAHWEH in a very subtle and elusive way!
Real men, who love YAHWEH, would rather rotate one of them sleeping on the floor while the other sleeps in the bed every night than do something like that!

The way the evil scribes are portraying their J-Esus teaching this, it suggests that these two men were in the habit of sleeping with each other every night like a man and his wife, and one night one of them were taken.

Cursed be the writers of the New Testament So-Called Gospels!

.................................................. .......................


3.) WAS J-ESUS HAVING SEX WITH HIS BOY WHEN CAPTURED BY THE ROMANS?

The unnatural love that the fraudulent gospels suggest existed between J-Esus and a young man or boy continues to be seen at his arrest.

In Mark 14:51-52, it states:

51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:

52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.

Now, what kind of love is it that would make a young man or boy not flee, like J-Esus' disciples did, when the Romans's came?

It had to be more powerful than the love J-Esus' disciples had for him. That's for sure. Because his disciples ran off and left him while the boy stayed!

Not only do the gospels suggest that J-Esus had an unnatural love for a boy, but now we see that the Gospel writers suggest that the boy had an unnatural love for J-Esus as well.

Now consider the type of relationship J-Esus had with a boy who had the nerve to follow him around naked with a sheet around him?

The way this is written, by the demonic writers of the gospels, is that this boy was so use to doing this type of thing that it did not seem wrong to the lad.

When you take into consideration what we saw in John 13:1-23, about J-Esus getting naked before his disciples with his boy between his arms and lying on his chest, and the boy sexually seducing J-Esus to reveal who it was that betrayed him, could it be possible that there was a similar setting when the Romans came to arrest Jesus.

Remember that in Mark 14:51-52 it states:

51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:

52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.

This suggests that Jesus was having a private moment with the boy somewhere not far away from his disciples.

Was this another case of the boy lying on top of J-Esus on his bosom?

Or were they doing something more intimate that they would rather not let the disciples see?

The point that suggests that Jesus had the boy some where, privately, is clearly seen when you consider that it appears that the boy did not know that the Romans soldiers had arrived.

But, after walking into the situation, he ran away, after the disciples had long been gone.

Now, this suggests that J-Esus was with the boy privately, away from the disciples, and J-Esus left to find out what was going on, possibly when he heard the sound of his disciples fleeing after they saw the Romans approaching.

This also suggests that, prior to the boy coming from the private place where he was at with J-Esus, away from his disciples, that J-Esus told his boy to stay put until he found out what was going on and that he would be right back.

And, when the boy sensed that something was wrong, and J-Esus was taking to long to come back, he went out to see what was going on with his lover!

Further analysis suggests that the reason why J-Esus was captured by the Roman soldiers was because his was to busy having his last love making session with his boy before he was killed.

Wow!

This suggests that the boy had some serious, potent loving, and J-Esus could not get enough of it, to such a degree, that, J-Esus was paralyzed mentally and did not realize that he was preparing to be captured!

May the writer of the gospel who wrote this subliminal view be damned in hell fire forever!

I hate the gospels for the lies they suggest against our Messiah!

.................................................. .......................


4.) DID J-ESUS RESURRECT TO STOP SEX BETWEEN HIS LOVER AND DISCIPLES?

Now, let's look at some thing very deep that shows us just how sinister the Gospel writers were.

I want to turn your attention to John 21:7,8, 20-22.

It is too much for me to type at this time.

Please read these scriptures, in your bibles, for yourselves.

In it, you see where the demonic Gospel writers wrote that J-Esus appeared to them when they were out on a boat fishing.

I want to bring your attention to verse 7, which states:

7. Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his fisher's coat unto him, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea.

8. The other disciples came in a little ship; (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging the net with fishes.

I am sure that those you who can read between the lines noticed the demonstration of an extra ordinary love that "the disciple Jesus loved" had towards him!

Wow!

This guy jumped into the sea and thought that he could swim back faster than the 11 other disciple could row back.

This reveals a blinding, extraordinary love like that of a woman who lost her virginity to a man.

Now, let me ask you this:

Why in the world was the young man or young boy naked amongst the disciples?

I don't care how hard they were working on the boat, trying to catch fish, it is unthinkable for a man to take off his clothes amongst other men until he is naked!

You don't see fisher men doing that today, and they are dealing with far bigger boats, far greater work, and far greater catches of fish.

Real men would have told that boy:

"Man, what in the world is wrong with you fool? Put some clothes on you idiot and don't ever disrespect us like that again!"

But, J-Esus' disciples did not do that.

Could it be that the reason why the "disciple whom J-Esus loved" (the 13th disciple who had no public ministry, like the other 12 disciples, other than to please J-Esus) was naked was because he was trying to seduce the other disciples?

Could they have been planning something with J-Esus' boy, like them taking a break from their work and running a sexual train on him, one after the other, out on the water, where most people could not see them, after they finished catching their fish?

Or could it be that one of them was planning to claim J-Esus' vacant leadership position as his own, and in the process, claim J-Esus boy as his own as a way to seal his authority and right to be the leader over all the disciples?

Now you see why I hate the so-called Gospels and recognize them for what they are: damnable documents that are demonic in nature when it comes to the Messiah!

These gospel verses go on to suggest that while they were fishing, the disciples remembered what J-Esus had commanded them to do in John 13:34, which states:

34. "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another."

Also, while out on the boat, where no one can see them, one or more of the disciples obeyed and said, well J-Esus is dead and his lover is here, with us, and we don't have wives, we might as well get us some of this boy's loving like J-Esus did and commanded us to do.

This also suggests that something sexual was preparing to get started and J-Esus appeared just in time to interrupt it and declare - hey, leave him along, that boy is mine!

This is the sickest line of suggestive reasoning to exist in any religious book in the history of the world!

Oh, but it does not stop there!

Later in the chapter, we see another scene of J-Esus relaxing with his disciples, as we saw in John 13:1-26 when he washed their feet with him being naked, with his genitals able to be seen, and afterward with his boy lying on top of him.

You can see this scene in verse 20-22 of John chapter 21, which states:

20. Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?

21. Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do?

22. Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come what is that to thee? follow thou me.

The sign that this young man or boy, who was naked in the boat, was the same as the one who followed him when the Romans captured J-Esus, can be seen in verse 20 where the youngster is described as following behind J-Esus naked with a sheet wrapped around him .

The gospel writer is clearly portraying this young man or boy as having some kind of feminine relationship because the boy is always in the woman's position when walking according to the custom of that day - always behind her husband and follow his lead!

Wow! Oh, halleluyahweh!

But, now watch this.

In verse 21, you see where Peter asked J-Esus about his boy.

J-Esus answered in such a sarcastic way that it suggests that he was over protective of the boy, even jealous of him.

This fits in with why he appeared, at first, to stop the boy from having sex on the boat with his disciples.

Judging by his words it was as if J-Esus was trying to back him up off his boy as if to say:

Hey! He's off limits and spoken for! You just focus on the ministry and not my boy!

Now, you see why Peter had to ask the boy to find out who it was that betrayed him after J-Esus washed their feet in John 13, instead of asking J-Esus himself.


It appears that Peter was scared to ask J-Esus things, some times, because of the attitude J-Esus would have, especially when Peter asks him about his boy.

Finally, J-Esus reaction seems to suggest that he was kind of against Peter as if he felt Peter wanted his boy all along!

But, why would J-Esus be like that with the man he said he would build his church upon?

Read Matthew 16:18, which states:

18. AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH; AND THE GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT.

None of this is consistent with reasoning. All this just doesn't make sense and proves my case that the Gospels are pure forgeries that no disciple ever wrote nor ever read!

If the disciples had read the garbage in the Gospels that have been handed down to us, they would have done a thorough investigation to find out who wrote them and banded that person from the ministry.

Then, they would have written a response to these fake Gospels to counter all the inaccuracies in the flow of reasoning and suggestions in them.


.................................................. .......................


5.) DID J-ESUS HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH HIS INITIATES?


In 1960 Morton Smith claimed to have discovered, in the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem in 1958, a copy of an epistle from Clement of Alexandria to one Theodore. The epistle contained two passages that Clement claimed came from a secret expansion of the canonical gospel of Mark. The story of this Clementine letter, as well as of this secret gospel of Mark, can be found in two books by Morton Smith himself, The Secret Gospel and Clement of Alexandria and the Secret Gospel of Mark.

Because of the, 3 page, "Clementine Letters," there's grounds to say that the gospel of Mark had parts in it, originally, that are missing today.

The reason why these verses are missing is because it went too deep in suggesting the homosexuality of J-Esus.

At that time, when the church found what was thought to be "The Secret Gospel Of Mark," they cried bloody murder against it and claimed it was false and full of lies.

Others, who got edited versions of Mark, thought that the homosexual part did not exist only because it had been taken out by the time they got their copies of Mark. They thought they had the original copies, but they did not.

The great controversy concerning the "Secret Gospel Of Mark" continues unto this very day.

If you can see through all the attacks on the missing verses themselves and be concern only with the original verses, that have been taken out of Mark, then you will see why the Christians try to neutralize them by putting so many attacks before and after the verses.

But, I believe that the statement is true and was a part of Mark, originally, and has been abbreviated and altered into only the few verses that we see in Mark today. We will take a look at those verses, but first let us take a look at the statement that was in the original version of Mark before it was taken out after being discovered.

I got this statement from the following site:

http://www.historian.net/secmark.htm

Below is where the homosexual nature of J-Esus was revealed in the three page letter of Clementine of Alexandria to one Theodore began to talk about the discovery of the homosexual verses in the versions of Mark that were circulating in his day:

The last part of page 2:

19 ... So I will not hesitate to answer the questions for you,
20 exposing their lies from the actual words of the gospel.
21 At any rate, after the part, "They were going up on the road to Jerusalem" and the following things
22 until, "after three days he will arise," it takes up according to the text:
23 "And they went to Bethany and there was a woman whose brother had died.
24 And coming up to him, she prostrated herself before Jesus and said to him, 'Son of David,
25 have mercy on me.' But the disciples rebuked her. And becoming angry,
26 Jesus went with her to the garden where the tomb was. And
Page 3:
01 immediately a great sound was heard from the tomb, and Jesus,going toward it
02 rolled away the stone from the entrance to the tomb. And going in immediately where
03 the young man was, he stretched out a hand and raised him up, holding
04 his hand. Then, the man looked at him and loved him and
05 he began to call him to his side, that he might be with him. And going from
06 the tomb, they went to the house of the young man. For he was rich. And after
07 six days, Jesus instructed him. And when it was late, the young man went
08 to him. He had put a linen around his naked body, and
09 he remained with him through that night. For Jesus taught him
10 the mystery of the kingdom of God. After he got up from there,
11 he turned to the region of the Jordan." And after these things, this follows:
12 "James and John go to him," and that whole section.
13 But the "naked man with naked man" and the other things you wrote about are
14 not found. After, "and he goes to Jericho," it adds only, "And the
15 brother of the young man whom Jesus loved was there, as well as
16 his mother and Salome. And Jesus did not welcome them."
17 But the many other things which you wrote both seem, and are, most false. So,
18 the truth according to the right interpretation. . .

Now, the suggestion of J-Esus spending the night with a naked man under a sheet and not letting in the man's family was to much for the Church leaders at that time.

As a result, this account was left out of the book of Mark, from that point on, and was claimed to be a forgery from that moment until today.

When you do a search on the Internet for this document, you will see far more claims of it being false and an insult than you do people considering if the document as authentic or not.

It's as if all the outrage and emotionalism was deliberately done to overwhelm anyone's mind from even considering the truthfulness of the document itself.

People end up more influenced by all the fire around the statement than the statement itself.

But, I was able to see through the uproar and why it was so great and see the document for what it is - a segment of Mark that was taken out of the original book of Mark or an updated book the writer of Mark was writing before he died.

One of the reasons why I believe the statement is true and not a fraud is because it is consistent with all the other gospel suggestions of the Christian messiah having been a homosexual that I have been showing you!
It fits right in with them! Perfectly!

Now, consider this insight.

In Mark 10:17-27, it talks about how a rich young ruler ran to J-Esus and kneeled before him and asked what he could do to inherit eternal life.
And, in verse 21, it says:

21. Then Jesus beholding him loved him...

Now, what is it really saying when it said that when J-Esus seeing him, loved him?

One thing for sure, is that it did not mean that when he saw his face he loved him because he had been conversing with the young man for a while and had seen his face from the beginning of the conversation.

So, his face had nothing to do with the love Jesus was turned on by as time went on with him engaging with the rich young ruler.

When the verse says, "then J-Esus seeing him," what did J-Esus see, of the man, that he did not see at first when he started talking to him?

This suggests that something happened between J-Esus and the young man that had not happened when they were conversing.

What was it?

What could have transpired between the two?

And, when the verses said that after J-Esus saw what he saw of the man, whatever it was, that he did not see when they first started talking, then J-Esus loved him.

Why is it that J-Esus did not love him at first?

Why did it take some time for something to happen for J-Esus to suddenly love him?

If he did not love him at first, then this is not the kind of love you have for a good person you first meet.

If that is the case, what kind of love was it that was different from the general love that Jesus should have had for him from the beginning?

Do you realized what all this suggests!

.................................................. .......................


6.) WAS J-ESUS' LOVER A MAN OR WOMAN?

The Christians have been hearing about the things I am saying about the Gospel's suggestions that J-Esus has a homosexual relationship with one of his disciples for centuries.

Now, Christians are launching a massive worldwide effort to make it look like that lover the gospels suggest J-Esus had was a woman.

They are trying to change it from a male lover to a female lover so it won't look that bad for their J-Esus.

Books like the Da Vinci Code, and movies about it, try to dispel the rumor that J-Esus has a homosexual lover, based on the hidden meaning of the gospels.

They hope this will work to stamp out the suggestion that if it was a male then J-Esus had to have been a homosexual.

They would rather it be that J-Esus was a fornicator who had a mistress than for it to be that he was a homosexual whose lover was a male.

Christians can write all the books and make all the movies they want to change this, but the fact remains that in John 21:20-21 the gospels make it clear that the disciple Jesus loved was a man.

It states:

20. Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord which is he that betrayeth thee?

21. Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this MAN do?
So, let there be no doubt that J-Esus' secret lover, that the gospels suggest he had, was most definitely a man and not a woman!

But for argument's sake, let's say that J-Esus' secret lover was a woman.
Then, it may lessen the offense, but it still makes him a fornicator and liar in that he had a woman in bed while acting like he was celibate.

And, in doing this, the suggestion that follows is that J-Esus caused people to believe and live his lie!

This was really him deceiving humanity, so perfectly that Paul and many other Christians have been remaining celibate for centuries based on J-Esus having deceived all future generations of Christians!

This he did by openly appearing celibate, while secretly having sex with either a man or a woman.

And, if the suggestion is true that it was a man, then the subsequent suggestion is that J-Esus and that man were, possibly, having oral and anal sex with each other.

Those damnable gospels are lies against our Messiah!

.................................................. .......................


7.) HOMOSEXUALS BELIEVE J-ESUS WAS GAY LIKE THEM

I have explained how that the satanic writers of the NT gospels suggest, in their so-called Gospels, that the Christian messiah was a homosexual.
They also suggested that the messiah, they want us to believe in, liked to get naked before his disciples and have a young man/boy lying on his chest (in between his arms).

At that time, I told you all that this was a lie against the true Messiah and a utter impossibility.

The purpose of this email is to let you know that homosexuals believe, as a fact, what I was telling you.

And, their belief, in this being a fact, is why they created a play on J-Esus being a homosexual!

Below are the links to the play with a homosexual Jesus:

http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=7541

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4085023.stm

Rumors have surfaced in the news that now, homosexuals are preparing to create a movie about J-Esus being a fagot.

So, if this is true, that play must have been really appealing and successful for them to be trying to make a movie about it now.

.................................................. .......................


8.) CHRISTIAN PICTURES WHICH SUGGESTS THAT J-ESUS LET YOUNG BOYS PERFORM ORAL SEX ON HIM LIKE THE GOSPELS SUGGEST HE DID WITH THOSE WHOS SOUGHT TO BE HIS INITIATES?

Click this link to see this picture:

http://poetry.rotten.com/jesus-with-boy


.................................................. ...................


I have been blessed by the most holy and wonderful YAHWEH to take you on a journey, into the fake Christian Gospels, to point out how wicked scribes where suggesting, to humanity, with out most people realizing it, that Jesus was a homosexual.

IN CLOSING, HOW DO YOU THINK A HOMOSEXUAL WOULD VIEW ALL THE HOMOSEXUAL SUGGESTIONS IN THE SCRIPTURES YOU HAVE SEEN THROUGH ME?

WOULD HE INTERPRET THEM AS MOST PEOPLE WOULD?
OH, NO.

HE OR SHE WOULD NOT.

THEY WOULD SEE A SPECIAL MESSAGE IN BETWEEN THE LINES OF THOSE SCRIPTURES THAT THEY FELT WERE ESPECIALLY FOR THEM.
THEY WOULD FEEL A SPECIAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THEM AND THE BIBLE THAT WOULD ALLOW HIM TO STILL BE HOMOSEXUAL WHILE THINKING THAT THE CREATOR LOVED THEM IN SPITE OF WHAT THE LAWS OF YAHWEH SAY.

YES, THEY WOULD SAY GOD LOVES THEM AND THEY'D BE UP IN THE CHURCHES JUST LIKE HOMOSEXUALS ARE TODAY.

WHY DO YOU THINK THERE ARE SO MANY HOMOSEXUAL CHURCHES APPEARING EVERY WHERE?

IT'S BECAUSE THEY SEE, IN SCRIPTURES, WHAT I HAVE REVEALED TO YOU.

BUT, THEY INTERPRET JESUS' SUGGESTED HOMOSEXUALITY IN A WAY THAT APPROVES OF THEIR HOMOSEXUALITY AND RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CHURCH AND EVEN HAVE GAY CHURCHES WITH GAY PASTORS WHERE ALL THE MEMBERS ARE GAY!

1.) Did The Scribes Portray J-Esus As Teaching Cannibalism?

2.) Did The Scribes Portray J-Esus As Teaching Vampirism?

3.) Did The Scribes Portray J-Esus As Teaching Self Mutilation?

4.) Did The Scribes Portray J-Esus As Teaching Suicidalism?

5.) Did The Scribes Portray J-Esus As Teaching Thievery?

6.) Did The Scribes Portray J-Esus As Teaching Homosexuality?

7.) Did The Scribes Portray J-Esus As Teaching Transvestism?

8.) Did The Scribes Portray J-Esus As Teaching Pedophilia?

.................................................. .....................


1.) DID THE SCRIBES PORTRAY J-ESUS AS TEACHING CANNIBALISM

The deceitful scribes of the New Testament create false, wrongly called Gospels that portray our Messiah as teaching things that lead the souls of humanity into eternal flames.

Consider the lies the scribes wrote about our Messiah that make it look like he was teaching cannibalism to his followers:

In St. John 6:51-58, it states:

51. I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

52. The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?

53. The Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

54. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

55. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

56. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me and I in him.

57. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

58. This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

The true Messiah never could have given teachings like this!

One of the reasons why is because, when he was here, there were many Satanic religions, especially the religion of Baal, that lead people into eating human flesh as a requirement of their gods.

Look at the word cannibal. It's composed of two words: "Canna" and "Baal."

Canna means: "priest of," and Bal means: "Baal" whose name is really that of Satan, the main adversary of YAHWEH.

Thus, in the Merriam Webster dictionary we have the word Cannibal which means:

"one who eats the flesh of its own kind"

Our true Messiah would never have taught to eat his flesh and drink his blood while knowing this is what the Satanic religions were doing everywhere in his days.

It's clear to me that the scribes wrote such damnable lies, concerning our Messiah, to show him keeping cannibalism alive in some type of religious arena be it figuratively or literally.

They did this in order to further orchestrate the deception of all mankind.

.................................................. .....................


2.) DID THE SCRIBES PORTRAY J-ESUS AS TEACHING VAMPIRISM?

As we saw above in John 6:51-58, the Gospel writers wrote that J-Esus taught Cannibalism and Vampirism.

But, here is how those who loved YAHWEH, such as the mighty King David, rebuked the idea of drinking blood or vampirism that was being done by so many people during his life.

In Psalm 16:4, it states:

4. Their sorrows shall be multiplied that hasten after another god: their drink offerings of blood will I not offer, nor take up their names into my lips.

Just like the mighty warrior, Kind David, a man after YAHWEH's own heart, rejected drinking blood as the heathen did, so should our true Messiah have done so as well.

But, as we saw, in John 6:51-58, the Gospel scribes made sure the version of the messiah they were presenting to us did not do as those who loved YAHWEH when it comes to drinking blood.

This is what let's us know that they were Satanists who wanted us to accept a Satanic messiah who promoted the Satanic practice of eating human flesh and drinking human blood.

Now, read 2nd Samuel 23:15-17, which states:

15. And David longed, and said, Oh that one would give me drink of the water of the well of Bethlehem, which is by the gate!

16. And the three mighty men brake through the host of the Philistines, and drew water out of the well of Bethlehem, that was by the gate, and took it, and brought it to David: nevertheless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out unto YAHWEH.

17. And he said, Be it far from me, O YAHWEH, that I should do this: is not this the blood of the men that went in jeopardy of their lives? therefore he would not drink it. These things did these three mighty men.

We saw above where the great warrior King David, refused to drink the actual blood offering as done by the heathen.

Here we see how he also refused to drink water that had been obtained by the shedding of blood even though it was not blood.

How much more should the scribes have done when they wrote about the messiah, they wanted us to know, teaching us to eat human flesh and drink human blood, regardless if he was shown doing this figuratively or not.

In Leviticus 3:17, YAHWEH gave laws for us, that even His Messiah would have kept, concerning eating human flesh and drinking human blood, which, the Gospel scribes made sure their version of the messiah did not do.

It reads as follows:

17. It shall be a perpetual statue for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood.

Now, consider Leviticus 7:22-27:

22. And YAHWEH said unto Moses, saying,

23. Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, Ye shall eat no manner of fat, of ox, or of sheep, or of goat.

24. And the fat of the beast that dieth of itself, and the fat of that which is torn with beasts, may be used in any other use: but ye shall in no wise eat of it.

25. For whosoever eateth the fat of the beast, of which men offer an offering made by fire unto YAHWEH, even that soul shall be cut off from his people.

26. Moreover ye shall eat no manner of blood, whether it be of fowl or of beast, in any of your dwellings.

27. Whatsoever soul it be that eateth any manner of blood, even that soul shall be cut off from his people.

In "The Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths And Secrets," by Barbera G. Wells, it states on page 467:

"Magicians also communed with their followers by the standard mystery-cult sacrament of bread-flesh and wine-blood. In texts on magic, " a magician-god gives his own body and blood to a recipient who, by eating it, will be united with him in love."

This is why women who practice voodoo put blood, from their monthly period, in the food of their men - so that he would be bound by a spell of love that he will not be able to escape from.

.................................................. .....................


3.) DID THE SCRIBES PORTRAY J-ESUS AS TEACHING SELF MUTILATION?


In Deuteronomy 14:1 it states:

14. Ye are the children of YAHWEH your Creator: ye shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness between your eyes for the dead.

Also in Leviticus 19:28 which states:

28. Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am YAHWEH.

Finally, consider Leviticus 21:5 which states:

5. They shall not make baldness upon their head, neither shall they shave off the corner of their beard, nor make any cuttings in their flesh.

Now, consider how the New Testament Gospel scribes, in a very tricky way, portrayed their messiah as teaching self mutilation.

Matthew 5:27-30 it states:

27. You have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:

28. But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

29. And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

30. And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

The trick to these verses that most people don't see is that the first two verses deals with lusting after what he sees with his eyes - a woman.

The last two verses actually tells a person to cut out his eyes or hands (especially if he felt on a woman's butt or private area).

The writers of the Gospels knew that this is nothing but a trick of the mind that leads to self mutilation.

Not only that, but they knew that countless numbers of people would take, literally, as if they were commandments, the words these scribes were attributing to J-Esus and they would die in the process.

Sometimes, there are television news broadcast about a foolish J-Esus freak who tore his eyes out of his head because he lusted at a woman.

I have seen news reports of those who nailed themselves to the cross literally, and some of them died in the process, as the New Testament Gospel scribes wanted them to do.

.................................................. .....................


4.) DID THE SCRIBES PORTRAY J-ESUS AS TEACHING SUICIDALISM?

Coming from another standpoint other than what I said above about the same scriptures, consider Matthew 5:27-30 states:

27. You have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:

28. But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

29. And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

30. And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

Now, based on what J-Esus taught, in these verses, if a man was to cut off each part of his body that he felt was the cause of his sin, he was to cut it off, ultimately, he would commit suicide and kill himself.

In 1st Kings 8:46, it states:

46. If they sin against thee, (for there is no man that sinneth not,) and thou be angry with them, and deliver them to the enemy, so that they carry them away slaves unto the land of the enemy, far or near...

Here we see that sin will continue in our lives today because "there is no man that sinneth not" as revealed by King Solomon, the wisest and richest King of all times.

Now, if a person is to cut off the body part he feels sins against him, ultimately, he will commit suicide!

It's just that simple!

For instance, based on the scribes reasoning's attributed to J-Esus, after a man has pulled out both his eyes, because twice he visualized himself going to bed with another man's wife, if he continues to visualize the same thing, the problem was not in his eyes, but is rather in his heart (which means he pulled his eyes out in vain).

Now that he realizes that the problem was really in his heart, then he is to cut his heart out!

If the fool lives through that horrible episode, and he continues to visualize himself going to bed with the same man's woman (which means that he cut his heart out in vain), then the problem lies in his brain.

So, now, he is to blow his brains out based on what the scribes wrote J-Esus said, right?

After he did that, he doesn't have to ever worry about lusting after any person's wife again!

.................................................. .....................


5.) DID THE SCRIBES PORTRAY J-ESUS AS TEACHING THIEVERY?

These evil hearted and demonic scribes had the nerves to portray their J-Esus as a leader of a crime ring!

They did it in writing right before your eyes, and most of you can't see it to save your lives.

However, right before the eyes of the world, the Christian messiah is shown teaching his followers to be thieves.

Wow!

It's true!

The Christian so-called Messiah sent his disciples to steal for him!

Before I show you the scriptural truth of all this, let me show you the following:

The most holy and wonderful YAHWEH gave us a commandment in Exodus 20:15 which states:

15. Thou shalt not steal.

But, the scribes show their messiah violating that commandment.

Now, consider that in, Webster's II New Riverside Dictionary, page 1134 it defines stealing as:

"to take the property of another without right or permission"

Ok. Let's see the scriptural proof that shows J-Esus sending his disciples out to steal for him.

Consider what Mark 11:1-6, it states the following:

1. And when they came nigh to Jerusalem, unto Bethphage and Bethany, at the mount of Olives, he sendeth forth two of his disciples,

2. And saith unto them, Go your way into the village over against you: and as soon as ye be entered into it, ye shall find a colt tied, whereon never man sat: loose him, and bring him.

[they were commanded not to seek permission to take the horse before taking him - which constitutes stealing the horse]

3. And if any man say unto you, Why do ye this? say ye that the Lord hath need of him; and straightway he will send him hither.

4. And they went their way, and found the colt tied by the door with out in a place where two ways met; and they loosed him. [they got caught stealing the horse before explaining why they needed it, which again constitutes stealing]

5. And certain of them that stood there said unto them, What do ye, loosing the colt?

6. And they said unto them even as Jesus had commanded: and they let them go.

What a joke!

.................................................. .....................


6.) DID THE SCRIBES PORTRAY J-ESUS AS TEACHING HOMOSEXUALITY?

I have sent out several releases that expound upon the scribes' portrayal of J-Esus being a homosexual.

I will not try to reveal all I have said about the subject now.

However, I will touch upon some of the suggestions, of the Gospel scribes, that portray J-Esus as being a homosexual.

The unnatural love that the fraudulent gospels suggest existed between J-Esus and a young man or boy continues to be seen at his arrest.

In Mark 14:51-52, it states:

51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:

52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.

Now, what kind of love is it that would make a young man or boy not flee, like J-Esus' disciples did, when the Romans's came?

It had to be more powerful than the love J-Esus' disciples had for him. That's for sure. Because his disciples ran off and left him while the boy stayed!

Not only do the gospels suggest that J-Esus had an unnatural love for a boy, but now we see that the Gospel writers suggest that the boy had an unnatural love for J-Esus as well.

Now consider the type of relationship J-Esus had with a boy who had the nerve to follow him around naked with a sheet around him?

The way this is written, by the demonic writers of the gospels, is that this boy was so use to doing this type of thing that it did not seem wrong to the lad.

When you take into consideration what we saw in John 13:1-23, about J-Esus getting naked before his disciples with his boy between his arms and lying on his chest, and the boy sexually seducing J-Esus to reveal who it was that betrayed him, could it be possible that there was a similar setting when the Romans came to arrest Jesus.

Remember that in Mark 14:51-52 it states:

51. And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:

52. And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.

This suggests that Jesus was having a private moment with the boy somewhere not far away from his disciples.

Was this another case of the boy lying on top of J-Esus on his bosom?

Or were they doing something more intimate that they would rather not let the disciples see?

The point that suggests that Jesus had the boy some where, privately, is clearly seen when you consider that it appears that the boy did not know that the Romans soldiers had arrived.

But, after walking into the situation, he ran away, after the disciples had long been gone.

Now, this suggests that J-Esus was with the boy privately, away from the disciples, and J-Esus left to find out what was going on, possibly when he heard the sound of his disciples fleeing after they saw the Romans approaching.

This also suggests that, prior to the boy coming from the private place where he was with J-Esus, away from his disciples, that J-Esus told his boy to stay put until he found out what was going on and that he would be right back.

And, when the boy sensed that something was wrong, and J-Esus was taking to long to come back, he went out to see what was going on with his lover!

Further analysis suggests that the reason why J-Esus was captured by the Roman soldiers was because his was to busy having his last love making session with his boy before he was killed.

Wow!

This suggests that the boy had some serious, potent loving, and J-Esus could not get enough of it, to such a degree, that, J-Esus was paralyzed mentally and did not realize that he was preparing to be captured!

May the writers of the gospel who wrote this subliminal view be damned in hell fire forever!

I hate the gospels for the lies they suggest against our Messiah!

.................................................. .....................


7.) DID THE SCRIBES PORTRAY J-ESUS AS TEACHING TRANSVESTISM?

I have asked you to read Matthew 5:27-30 which states:

27. You have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:

28. But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

29. And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

30. And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

Now, let me ask you something.

Based on J-Esus' teachings above, should a man cut off his penis and testicles if he committed adultery or fornication with them?

In verse 27, it addresses this but does not elaborate on it like it does the other acts.

But, if you consider the other acts (of the eye and right hand) and and how they were to be cut off because they were used to committ sin, and apply this process to verse 27, then, any person who commits any type of sexual sin should cut off his penis and testicles like transvestites do.

If this commandment of J-Esus was to be kept, since most sins are sexual in nature, and regardless if a person has his sexual organs cut out, most people who undergo this would continue to seek sexual satisfaction, in some way, even if it's oral or anal.

With this being the case, the fact remains that they will be living like transvestites, and actually be transvestites, rather they know it or not, if they follow J-Esus' teachings in the so-called Gospels!

.................................................. .....................

8.) DID THE SCRIBES PORTRAY J-ESUS AS TEACHING PEDOPHILIA

This is one of the hardest to see deceptions of the Gospel scribes.

Please consider the following spiritual laws of YAHWEH concerning how to raise your children.

Proverb 22:6,15:

6. Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.

15. Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.


Proverbs 13:24:

24. He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.


Proverbs 19:18:

18. Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not they soul spare for his crying.


Proverbs 23:12-14:

12. Apply thine heart unto instruction, and thine ears to the words of knowledge.

13. Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die.

14. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver this soul from hell.


Now take a look at how the New Testament scribes counter YAHWEH's rules on child rearing.

Matthew 18:1-6 states:

1. At that same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?

2. And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,

3. And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

4. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

5. And whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.


Mark 9:33-37 states:

33. And he came to Capernaum: and being in the house he asked them, What was it that ye disputed among yourselves by the way?

34. But they held their peace: for by the way they had disputed among themselves, who should be the greatest.

35. And he sat down, and called the twelve, and saith unto them, If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all, and servant of all.

36. And he took the child, and set him in the midst of them: and when he had taken him in his arms, he said unto them,

37. Whosoever shall receive one of such children in my name, receiveth me: and whosoever shall receive me, receiveth not me, but him that sent me.

Most of you will find nothing wrong with what the Gospel scribes have written in these verses and attributed to the J-Esus they want us to believe in.

However, there is a major wrong in them.

First of all, the true Messiah would not have spoken against the spiritual laws concerning the parent's right to chastise their children.

The reason why he would not have spoken against this is because he would have been fully aware of the scriptures in Proverbs, from YAHWEH, that allow and encourage the chastisement of children when they get out of their place or did some evil.

Secondly, if you reseach the ethics of the Jews, it is wrong for any man, other than a family member, to take a child he does not know or that he has seen for the first time, and put his hands on him as if the child is his own.

In Matthew 18:2, we saw where it states:

2. And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,

For J-Esus to set him "in the midst of them" suggests that J-Esus used his hands and arms to place the boy in the midst of the people.

Some of you may think that I am wrong about this, but let it suffice to say that no "TRUE" man of YAHWEH will ever position a boy or girl with his hands.

He would not even touch them if they are not his own. And, even if they are his relatives, he would be hesitant about handling them.

In Mark 9:36, we also saw where it states:

36. And he took the child, and set him in the midst of them: and when he had taken him in his arms, he said unto them,

In this verse it is clear that J-Esus had the boy in his arms when he set him in the midst of them!

This was wrong!


This is the same as the Santa Claus custom, in most Christian countries, when people, many years before shopping malls existed and since they came to being, came in great numbers to let their children sit on Santa's lap. Today, they take pictures of their children doing so.

From time of old until now, what most people don't know is that the vast majority of Santa's were pedophiles who dressed up like Satan only to have a child sitting in their laps, in many cases, on top of their sexual organs.

If the children were not sitting on top of Satan's sexual organs, they were sitting so close to them that they were only inches away.

No parent should let their children sit on the lap of an individual they know absolutely nothing about and who could be a pedophile!

Concerning the portrait painted by the scribes in this view, think about the extraordinary effort their J-Esus took in teaching against all the rules concerning raising your children.

The rules of YAHWEH made it clear that:

Proverbs 13:24:

24. He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.


Proverbs 19:18:

18. Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not they soul spare for his crying.


Proverbs 23:12-14:

12. Apply thine heart unto instruction, and thine ears to the words of knowledge.

13. Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die.

14. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver this soul from hell.

Now, for the scribes to show us their J-Esus speaking against these teachings of YAHWEH suggest that they were giving us a pedophile in disguise!

Consider how hard the scribes show J-Esus coming against the strict rules of YAHWEH concerning raising and correcting your children in the following verses we looked at.

Matthew 18:5

5. And whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

This is a really twisted teaching!

This portrayal of the so-called Christian messiah shows him saying that if you keep YAHWEH's rules for raising and correcting your children, it's "better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

Only a true pedophile would come against the rules of YAHWEH like that!

This complete and total countering of YAHWEH's words suggest that this person thought he had more wisdom than YAHWEH!

Those of you who have been around pedophiles, like those I was around in prison, know that when it comes to children, it's impossible for them to think right at all!

They will go against everything and all truths, like the Christian J-Esus went against YAHWEH's rules concerning raising and correcting children, if it will leave them in a better position with your children, especially if you children are sitting in their laps!

So is it with the version of the messiah, the Christian scribes are presenting to us.

Consider Matthew 18:2-4 that we saw above:

2. And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,

3. And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

4. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

Here the scribes are presenting to us a J-Esus who thinks that children are wiser, smarter, and more humbler than adults!

Any one who knows anything about children knows that this is the furtherest thing from the truth!

Who ever heard or saw a humble child?

I have not out of almost 55 years of life!

The only thing I have seen about children is woe be unto them that have them.

But, with proper raising and correction, they can eventually grow into humble adults!

This is why they are not considered grown, here in most American states, until they reach the age of 18 or 21.

This J-Esus the scribes are presenting to us is an idiot pedophile in disguise!

Trust me on this one!

The logic concerning all we have consider suggests that it is something about this dude!

What it suggests is that he is so child obsessed that he would come against and violate the rules of YAHWEH to have the type of relationships the Catholic priests have with their following - they can do whatever they want with the children of the members of his church!

The Catholic priests raping and molestation of children, to the dismay of many parents, has been so well documented until I can only give you the links to some of the stories about them on Google:

http://www.google.com/search?q=catholic+priests%27+molestation+of+childr en&rls=com.microsoft:*:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7

According to the Christian writers of the Gospels, their J-Esus was a pedophile in disquise!

And, judging by his example, he taught people, especially the Catholic priests, that it's alright to be a pedophile like him.

It's just that simple!

HORUS AND CHRIST SIMILARITIES

reprinted by:

PROPHET YAHWEH
Seer Of Yahweh
Master Salvation Teacher


P'TAH (Gods of Heaven came to Earth from the Celestial Disk) installed as Egypt's first Divine Ruler his own son RA and RA then divided the Egyptian kingdom between the 'gods' OSIRIS and SETH who fought over control of the kingdom. After OSIRIS was killed, resuscitated and resurrected, his place on the throne was taken over by his son HORUS, whose mother was ISIS.

Then HORUS was given Upper and Lower Egypt by the Lord of the Earth thus becoming the legitimate heir in the RA-OSIRIS line of succession, establishing that kingship had a perpetual divine connection. (To understand Egyptian history, one must read Sitchin's books about the Sumerian civilization and its connection to Egypt.)

Some say that the Christian religion came directly out of the Egyptian religion; at least, it was the probable source of the origins of Christianity.

Be it further noted that Zecharia Sitchin in The Lost Realms (page 183), claims that the Sumerian ENKI was the Egyptian P'TAH, the Sumerian MARDUK was the Egyptian RA and NINGISH was the Egyptian THOTH. Now let's compare the Egyptian HORUS with the Christian JESUS CHRIST.

---------------------------------------------------------

A List of the similarities between Horus and Jesus:


>Horus and the Father are one.
>Jesus says, "I and My Father are one. He that seeth Me, seeth Him that sent Me."

>Horus is the Father seen in the Son.
>Jesus claims to be the Son in whom the Father is revealed.

>Horus was the light of the world, the light that is represented by the symbolical eye, the sign of salvation.
>Jesus is made to declare that He is the light of the world.

>Horus was the way, the truth, the life by name and in person.
>Jesus is made to assert that he is the way, the truth, and the life.

>Horus was the plant, the shoot, the natzar.
>Jesus is made to say: "I am the true vine."

>Horus says: It is I who traverse the heaven; I go round the Sekhet-Arru (the Elysian Fields); Eternity has been assigned to me without end. Lo! I am heir of endless time and my attribute is eternity.
>Jesus says: " I am come down from Heaven. For this is the will of the Father that everyone who beholdeth the Son and believeth in Him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day." (He, too, claims to be lord of eternity.)

>Horus says: " I open the Tuat that I may drive away the darkness."
>Jesus says: " I am come a light unto the world."

>Horus says: I am equipped with thy words O Ra (the father in heaven) (ch.32) and repeat them to those who are deprived of breath. (ch.38). These were the words of the father in heaven.
>Jesus says: " The Father which sent me, he hath given
me a commandment, what I should say and what I should
speak. Whatsoever I speak, therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak. The word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me."

A comparative list of some pre-existing types to Christianity shows further how these types were brought on in the canonical Gospels and the Book of Revelation:

1. Horus baptized with water by Anup = Jesus Baptized with water by John.

2. Anup, the Baptizer = John the Baptist.

3. Aan, a name of the divine scribe = John the divine scribe.

4. Horus born in Annu, the place of bread = Jesus born in Bethlehem, the house of bread.

5. Horus the Good Shepherd with the crook upon his shoulders = Jesus the Good Shepherd with the lamb or kid upon his shoulder.

6. The Seven on board the boat with Horus = The seven fishers on board the boat with Jesus.

7. Horus as the Lamb = Jesus as the Lamb.

8. Horus as the Lion = Jesus as the Lion.

9. Horus identified with the Tat or Cross = Jesus identified with the Cross.

10. Horus of twelve years = Jesus of twelve years.

11. Horus made a man of thirty years in his baptism = Jesus made a man of thirty years in his baptism.

12. Horus the Krst = Jesus the Christ.

13. Horus the manifesting Son of God = Jesus the manifesting Son of God.

14. The trinity of Atum the Father, Horus the Son, and Ra the Holy Spirit = The trinity of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

15. The first Horus as a child of the Virgin, the second as the Son of Ra = Jesus as the Virgins child, the Christ as Son of the Father.

16. Horus the sower and Set the destroyer in the harvesting = Jesus the sower of the good seed and Satan the sower of tares.

17. Horus carried off by Set to the summit of Mount Hetep = Jesus spirited away by Satan into an exceedingly high mountain.

18. Set and Horus contending on the Mount = Jesus and Satan contending on the Mount.

19. The Star as the announcer of the child Horus = The Star in the East that indicated the birthplace of Jesus.

20. Hours the avenger = Jesus who brings the sword.

21. Horus as Iu-em-Hetep, who comes with peace = Jesus the bringer of peace.

22. Horus the afflicted one = Jesus the afflicted one.

23. Horus as the type of life eternal = Jesus the type of eternal life.

24. Horus as Iu-em-Hetep, the child teacher in the temple = The child Jesus as teacher in the temple.

25. The mummy bandage that was woven without seam =The vesture of Christ without a seam.

26. Twelve followers of Horus as Har-Khutti = Twelve followers of Jesus as the twelve disciples.

27. The revelation written down by Aan (Tehuti) the scribe of divine words = The revelation by John the divine.

28. The saluter Aani, who bears witness to the word of Ra and to the testimony of Horus = John who bears witness to the Word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ.

29. The secret of the Mysteries revealed by Taht-Aan = The secret of the Mysteries made known by John.

30. Horus the Morning Star = Jesus the Morning Star.

31. Horus who gives the Morning Star to his followers = Jesus who gives the Morning Star to his followers.

32. The name of Ra on the head of the deceased = The name of the Father written on the forehead.

33. The Paradise of the Pole Star-Am-Khemen = The Holy City lighted by one luminary, that is neither the Sun nor the Moon = the Pole Star.

34. The Har-Seshu, or servants of Horus = The servants of Jesus Christ.

................................................

All Rights Reserved - Copyrighted 2007 - By Prophet Yahweh
................................................


... inside this chapter...


PROOF JESUS IS ESUS

ESUS WAS A PART OF A TRINITY LIKE J-ESUS

COMPARISION OF THE LIFE OF J-ESUS AND ESUS

ESUS AND THE MISTLETOE

THE BIRD ASSOCIATION

A GOD OF WAR

STABBED WHILE BEING HUNG

..........................................

THE PROOF JESUS IS ESUS

A review of the Esus connection to the Latin and Greek forms of Jesus (Iesus/Iesous)

[In this release, I have shown you the Latin and Greek names for J-Esus (Iesus and Iesous). In the following descriptions, you will see Esus being connected to those same names. So therefore, if J-Esus has Latin and Greek forms and those same forms also belong to Esus, then JESUS is ESUS]

1.) http://www.jetlink.com.ph/~religion/relig022.htm:

Further to this the letter J is not known in Latin as such the name "Jesus" should be actually read as "Esus", "Iesus" or Esa ( as mentioned in the Qur’an).

2.) Christian Churches Of God, stated the following concerning the name Esus.

In http://www.logon.org/english/s/p127.html (paragraphs 5-7) it states that:
"... Iesus appears to be a rendering based on the Celtic Esus, one of a triumvirate of gods found among the Hyperborean Celts (see ERE, Vol. 3, p. 278)... The name Esus probally entered Greece from the North with the Hyperborean religious system and the Mysteries... Esus was the mainland god who is pictured, on the altar at Treves, as cutting down a tree in which is a bull’s head and three cranes."

3.) http://austin.indymedia.org/usermedia/application/7/What%5C's_In_a_Name.doc

... When the Bible was first translated by Wycliffe from Latin into English, the Latin spelling "Iesus/Iesu" was retained. When William Tyndale translated the New Testament into English from the original Greek in 1525, he followed Wycliffe and also used the Latin spelling (Iesus/Iesu) because English uses the Latin alphabet. The other early English Bibles, Coverdale, Geneva, Bishops, and the 1611 KJV all used the "Iesus/Iesu" spelling. Not until the 1629 edition of the KJV was the "Jesus" spelling used...

... The Pope banned and burned the Bible, and the only ones existing were chained to monastery walls for translation and study purposes during the “dark ages”. The translations were in Latin and the Iesous, son of Zeus, the Eagle God, became the Catholic “Jesus...”

[Notice, below, how the Latin names for J-Esus (Iesus and Iesous) are also the names for the devil Esus according to this reference above.]

Dionysus god of wine (Iesus-Iesius-Esus-Iesous) = An Eagle son-of-the-sun of Zeus. Also known as Baachus.

Iesus (Iesius-Evus-Essus-Issus-Yesus-Yesos) The Assyrian god of War and major Celtic god.

Evus (Esus-Iesus) = Bloody god of war, with blood sacrifices, and horrific rituals.

Esus (Iesus-Iesous) Blood sacrifices and worship was at the Greek’s Temple-Shrine of “El-Eusis”

http://www.nationnews.com/293605408317320.php

"Familiarity with the prophecies of the Messiah and their fulfilment in Jesus Christ of Nazareth together with Peter's admonition that an apostasy would arise (II Peter 2:1) and Paul's reference to "another Jesus" being preached (II Corinthians 11: 4) would make it clear that the "other Jesus" might have had his roots not in Bethlehem but in the Celtic god Esus, latinised to Iesus..."

http://www.jetlink.com.ph/~religion/relig022.htm:

Further to this the letter J is not known in Latin as such the name "Jesus" should be actually read as "Esus", "Iesus" or Esa ( as mentioned in the Qur’an ).

.................................................. ............

ESUS WAS A PART OF A TRINITY LIKE J-ESUS

1.) http://www.algonet.se/`hermesat/issa.htm, states:

"The Druid Culture who flourished in Britain at that time believed in a trinity and they also had a messianic tradition, the Celtic Messiah was known as Esus." [also know as J-Esus]

2.) http://www.logon.org/english/s/p174.html "The Government of God (No. 174)," Section "God and His Government in the Family of God, sub-section "The significance of the Nature of God to the system of Government: the law system or economy of Salvation, paragraph 9 or 10:

"The Greco-Romans were faced with the problem of using the power of the Christian faith without the attendant law-order systems and the clear identification of the one true God. This theological war developed into the councils of Nicea in 325 to Chalcedon in 450-1. The development of that system into the Triune Godhead was also a feature of the other Gentile systems (i.e. in the Celts it was as Taranis, Teutates and Esus)."

.................................................. ....................

COMPARISION OF THE LIFE OF J-ESUS AND ESUS

Here is further proof that the Christian J-ESUS is really ESUS, the devil.
When you compare the histories of the worship of ESUS many centuries before Christianity, you will see that the Christian assimilated the histories of ESUS into their religion and claimed them as the histories of their J-ESUS.
Let me give you a few examples of these comparisons between the religion of ESUS and J-ESUS:

ESUS was called "the lord"

J-ESUS was called "the lord"

ESUS was called the "Good Master"

J-ESUS was called the "Good Master"

ESUS was associated with a "mistletoe"

J-ESUS was associated with a "mistletoe"

ESUS was associated with a "Bird" (a dove/crane)

J-ESUS was associated with a "Bird" (a dove)

ESUS stated "I am the life"

J-ESUS stated "I am the life"

ESUS was called the "Seed"

J-ESUS was called the "Seed" (of David)

ESUS had a sign placed over his head

J-ESUS had a sign placed over his head

ESUS had two companions: a elf and a fairy.

J-ESUS has two companions who where nailed to the cross with him.

ESUS was pictured with 3 beings on the cross/tree

J-ESUS was picture with 3 beings on the cross/tree:

ESUS had a "fish" as his symbol

J-ESUS had a "fish" as his symbol

ESUS has a female consort

J-ESUS had a female consort: Mary Magdalene

ESUS had a bull associated with him

J-ESUS has a donkey associated with him

ESUS was associated with a mother goddess

J-ESUS was associated with a mother goddess

ESUS was said to terminate the old for the new

J-ESUS was said to have terminated the old testament for the new testament
I have references that prove all of this, and as soon as I get settled, I will present them to you.

I have spent a lot of time and effort gleaning these references from the various libraries, and anywhere else I could find them, over many years.

.................................................. ....................

This are a few of the comparisons between the pagan deity ESUS and the Christian J-ESUS.

And, since it is a fact that ESUS was worshiped in Europe for many centuries before the rise of Christianity, then the Christians had to have taken the histories of the devil ESUS and used them as histories of their J-ESUS.

.................................................. ....................

ESUS AND THE MISTLETOE

[The mistletoe was brought over into Christianity after spending thousands of years as a pagan or Satanic religious item. It became a Christian tradition whereby any woman caught standing under a mistletoe, without realizing it, was suppose to kiss the man who found her standing there.]

Esus and the mistletoe

J-Esus and the mistletoe

It was also a religious item in the worship of Esus.

Pagan Celtic Britain, by Anne Ross, page 278 states:

"As noted, the Celtic thunder god, Taranis, appears in conjunction with the oak tree on certain Gallo-Roman monuments, and the tree, twined with mistletoe, is represented on the Lyons silver cup on which a deity, probably Lugus himself, and an eagle also figure (p. 139, n.)..."

http://druidnetwork.org/en/articles/stefanallen.html - Scroll down to the section: The Mistletoe Foundation

.................................................. ....................

BIRD ASSOCIATION

[Have you ever wondered why there was a dove associated with J-Esus in the New Testament's Gospels? (Mt. 3:16, Mark 1:10, Lk 3:22, Joh 1:32) Maybe it was because birds where associated with Esus before the Christian J-Esus was created. The stories of Esus were modified and brought over into the fables about the newly formed J-Esus who was really Esus transformed into a Christian god.]

Pagan Celtic Britain, by Anne Ross, page 270 states:

"As birds are associated so intimately with the pagan concept of the happy other world, and regarded as a form adopted by other world beings, it is natural that the concept of the bird soul and of the singing other world birds, bestowers of joy and forgetfulness, and relievers of pain, should be transferred with ease and with little modification into a Christian milieu, itself rich in bird symbolism drawn from many traditions and mythologies.

The miracle-working saint with bird attributes is not so very far removed from the wonder-working god or Druid, also possessing helpful birds or magic bird-flocks. The three stately birds on the throne of God in the Vision of Adamnan, which concentrate exclusively on their Lord:

Three stately birds moreover, in the chair (or city) in the presence of the King, and their mind on the Lord forever, that is their art.

They are not fundamendally different from the pagan concepts of, for example, the three symbolic egrets on the altars to the Gaulish Esus, or the two ravens perched on the shoulders of the Celtic god from the Cote d’ Or or the Scandinavian Odin."

........................................

Pagan Celtic Britain, by Anne Ross, page 279 states:

"Turning to the iconographic contexts in which the bird figures during the Gallo-Roman and Romano-British period, we find that, unlike many of the other birds which were popular in the European cults, the crane and related species continue to be represented, and there is evidence for a continuity in the cult importance of these marsh birds which is lacking in the case of many of the other species.

There are two very important slabs on which marsh birds are represented, both dating from the first century A.D. The first was discovered in 1711 in the choir of the church of Notre Dame in Paris (pl. 77a). On one side of the stone, a bearded deity is figured, wearing a short tunic which leaves his right shoulder bare. He is in the act of cutting a branch from a willow tree. At his feet lies a branch that has been severed from the tree. The same tree is figured again on a fourth side of the stone, and below it stands a bulll with two large wading birds on its back and a third between its horn (pl. 77b). The name Esus, ‘Lord, Master’ appears above the woodcutter diety, and the name TARVOSTRIGARANUS above the bull, meaning ‘The Bull with the Three Cranes’.

The symbolism of this first stone is matched by that of another relief discovered in 1895 at Treves (pl. 77c). On one side Mercury, wearing a Celtic tore, is portrayed in company with Rosmerta, his consort, and the cock, his chthonic attribute. On another side of the same stone a woodcutter is depicted, almost certainly the Esus of the Paris Stone. He is engaged in cutting down a willow tree which contains the head of a bull and three large wading birds."

........................................

A GOD OF WAR

[According to Mt. 10:34, J-Esus declared that he was really a god of war when he said - "Think not that I am come to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." This war god attitude of J-Esus was the same as that of Esus]

Pagan Celtic Britain, by Anne Ross, page 280, speaking of the crane, states:
"If this bird is, then, in some way connected with war, its association with a god, claimed by the first Berne commentator to be the Gaulish equivalent of Mars, does much to substantiate his claim, that is, that Esus was, in at least one of his aspects, a god of war, or at least connected in some way with military affairs."
.......................................

Pagan Celtic Britain, by Anne Ross, page 292 states concerning the nature of the crane or birds associated with Celtic gods:

"It appears as a female form of metamorphosis in the insular traditions suggests that it was originally the attribute or shape assumed by some potent and formidable goddess, consort or servant of a fundamental god-type, Esus, Midir, Manannan."

........................................

STABBED WHILE BEING HUNG

[In John 19:34, it states the following about J-Esus being stabbed on the cross: "But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water." Well, the devil Esus was also know as being stabbed while hanging and human sacrifices were also stabbed in rememberance of him.]

http://www.conjure.com/whocelts.html

paragraph 16

"We believe that Classical sources tended to sensationalize Celtic religion. They were, after all, writing about foreigners whom they considered barbarians. It is the odd and "uncivilized" information that is most often reported. There is very little information on the deities themselves in these sources because the writers tend to conflate Celtic deities with their own where their worship is similar.

Thus, we get sensationalists like Lucan (1st century CE) reporting that there were three major Gods of the Gauls who demanded human sacrifice, Taranis (burning), Teutates (drowning) and Esus (hanging and wounding). The Romans had banned human sacrifice only a generation or two earlier and felt superior on this account."

...........................................
Pagan Celtic Britain, by Anne Ross, page 34 states:

"The reference to the nine-score hardships endured by Odin in the ash tree Yggdrasil when he sacrificed himself to himself. ‘I know that I hung full nine nights on the windy tree wounded by the javelin (Lleu is killed by a spear), given to Odin, myself to myself.’

The fact that the Welsh episode in the oak tree is reminiscent of the passage in Havamal, and that men were repeatedly sacrificed to Esus by hanging and stabbing (p. 248) stresses the neccessity for a general investigation of religious exchanges and influences between the Celtic and Germanic peoples."

On page 248, of the same book, it states:

"Conaire’s retinue at the hostel of Da Derga is being described by a messenger. In one ‘cubicle’ (imdae) the threefold war goddess is observed and described in the following terms: ‘I beheld a trio, naked, on the ridge-pole of the house: their jets of blood coming through them, and the ropes of their slaughter on their necks. "Those I know" says he, "three" of awful boding. Those are the three that are slaughtered at every time..

The Berne Scholiast on Lucan records that men were sacrificed to the great Gaulish god Esus by being hung in trees and then stabbed so that their blood flowed and omens could be drawn from the direction in which it ran (p. 278). Moreover, the Germanic god Odin, who may have owed something of his origin to the Celts, is made to say in the Havamal: ‘I know that I hung full nine nights on the gallows tree, wounded by the javelin and given to Odin, myself to myself..."

Dear List,

The Christian thought police know all I am telling you is the truth, and they are so very afraid that I will reveal them to you that they go to all lengths to stop me.

But, what they don't know is that as a true prophet of YAHWEH, I feed off of all that they do.

I grow stronger with each of their feeble works.

What they do is proof that want YAHWEH is doing through me has power to shake up the powers that be!

Listen to how I am being opposed by the Christians.

There are teams of Christians who do nothing but:

go everywhere I have been and try to sabotage what I am trying to do

getting me terminated from any more television and radio coverage

whenever I mention about me going on the air, they call the hosts and try to pressure them not to let me on

contacting and harassing my doctors

harassing and intimidating reporters who cover me so they won't cover me any more, etc.

These are the same Christians who:

sabotaged the video area of my website

sabotaged my site's email program

sabotaged my bank account

made terrorist threats against my life and everyone who is associated with me

These Christians have launched an all out smear campaign against me and have:

stolen my personality on line

set up websites, talk shows, and groups in my name

mass registration of my name in many porn and homosexual groups

acting like they are me in those places and others and posting all kinds of homophobic statements to try to get me killed


creating fake and insulting videos about me on the Internet, especially those that are racially inflaming


taken things I say or teach and using them out of context to create mass hatred for me

post misinformation, disinformation, and truth out context to vary hate groups to try to inspire my assassination


forged complete and total lies against me, especially those that blaspheme and say things that would call for my death

recording my telephone conversations and posting them on the Internet

mass signing me up to porn groups and homosexual groups

trying to get my ISP and Internet accounts suspended

Calling me and asking to call them back but leaving other people's numbers and names

.................................................. ...


Isn't this wonderful!

Oh, halleluyahweh!

This is great!

I am loving this so very much.

Because of all this, I know that I am doing things right in my war against the enemy gods of holy YAHWEH and bringing honor to His holy name.


Sincerely Yours In The Love Of YAHWEH,

Prophet Yahweh
Seer of Yahweh

Who is this Prophet Yahweh? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophet_Yahweh http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcQtVVpPxjY http://www.youtube.com/prophetyahweh
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45369
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/01/72482
What do you folks make of this???????? Was watching his ufo summoning video and found all this, I dont even know what to say....

[edit] Claims
Based on the scriptures from the Old Testament and from most of the Book of Revelation. Prophet Yahweh states:

1.Yahweh is the proper name for the creator of the universe.

2.Yahweh lives on a planet located in the centre of the universe, with his angels living on the same planet as he.

3.The Israelites are black in skin color.

4.Yahweh and his angels are jet-black in skin color.

5.The Elders are part of the Universal Council who make key decisions affecting the Universe.

6."Pillar of Fire", "Pillar of Cloud", "Chariot of Fire", and "The glory of Yahweh" describe spaceships.

7. The Messiah, whose name is Immanuel instead of Jesus, will come with 20,000 spaceships to reinstate the true religion of Yahweh and to make sure that all human souls will be saved.

8. As a result of Adam's sin, humanity was stripped of superhuman power which enables them to levitate, fly and enables them to have other kinds of superhuman power.

9. Yahweh and his angels are superhuman men, not spirits. Yahweh's angels have long robes, magnificent turbans on their head and gold.

10. That it was foretold that a counterfeit state of Israel will be created with a race that will claim to be Jews but they are really White converts to Judaism.

11. Praying with your face facing the ground is wrong to do as Satan who was cursed to crawl on his belly, faced the ground. The correct way to pray is looking up towards the sky (as Yahweh lives in outer space)with both your hands raised upwards.

?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????

The whole "Aliens-visited-long-ago" theory has been done lots of times.

There used to be an online video called "The chariots of the Gods" that goes over several unexplained ancient structures.

Theres Michael Tsarions theories.

Theres Lobsang Rampas ideas.

etc.

They all say the same things, basically. What is any different here?

A wall of text

Way way waaaay tl;dr.

I get what you're saying but the wall of text is a bit intimidating.

I was able to get through most of it.

Man, I respect the effort put in, but salvation isn't something earned by us through the labels and rituals we put to work in life: We're saved not because of what we do, but because of who the Master is.

The Master's name is indeed important and holy...but speaking it doesn't save us. Neither does holding it from one's tongue. The same with the Master's incarnates.

OP, please be advised that the original post is spam. The post constitutes a bannable offense.

I urge you to delete it. For the time being, I will keep the thread open.

BTW, there is no such entity as "the Devil," by any name, and the Nazz was first referred to as such in, I think, a 1528 translation of the Bible.

see http://www.uwm.edu/Library/special/exhibits/clastext/clspg007.htm

How is it spam, it fits in this forum.... I didn't write that either, its from this prophet Yahweh dude from las vegas.... Read it all it's pretty interesting....

If you're saying you're going to ban me for posting this, ill delete it.. But really thats ridiculous..

I am was raised Catholic and went through all the sacraments up to confirmation. I now find one overwhelming flaw with Catholicism and much of Christianity, and that is that God gave us his only son. We learn that we are all Gods children in church, and yet there is this one who is Gods "only" son.

Even as a child I remember thinking what if I have been tricked and I am believing in a false religion. What if Satan's greatest trick wasn't making us think he didn't exist, but instead it was making us believe that he was the true son of God.

If Satan fooled much of humanity into thinking that Jesus was our savior while Jesus was really just Satan, then Satan has won. Another thing that never made sense to me was why I was worshiping Jesus. Catholics recite prayers, saying they believe in one God, and yet we prayed to the Lord and another entity known as Jesus. We have a ceremony in which we eat and drink the blood of Christ. In Catholicism the bread and wine are not just symbols but the actual body/blood.

The Church has done an amazing job at keeping control over the population and the Church has committed evil deeds throughout history. If I were Satan I would constantly try to manipulate tribes into fighting (Christians vs Muslims). Finally, if there is a real mark of the beast and we assume that the OP is correct about Jesus being related to Satan, then can we also assume that the sign of the beast may not be that of 666. Might the mark possibly be the cross, the sign of Jesus and possibly the sign of the beast. Think about all of the people who wear crosses, have tats of a cross, have a sticker on their car. I for one would be marked and completely oblivious to it's true meaning.

Thanks for letting me throw my two cents into the ring.

I'm not going to pretend I read all of that.

Next time post a link instead.

Is Jesus really satan?

Prove either of those existed.

Until then, you are comparing Conan to the Grinch, or suggesting that Peter Pan was Sherlock Holmes.

I'm not going to pretend I read all of that.

Next time post a link instead.

Cant, you have to join a group to see it...

Is Jesus really satan?

Prove either of those existed.

Until then, you are comparing Conan to the Grinch, or suggesting that Peter Pan was Sherlock Holmes.

Um... dude, Sherlock Homes was real.

Um... dude, Sherlock Homes was real.

Think again, Holmes.

Um... dude, Sherlock Homes was real.

lol retard.


Anyway, op, my answer to your posts are this:

What in the blue fuck kind of sour hash did you hot knife before undergoing this deranged fail train-of-thought?

I mean, could you at least have written up a concise summary when you make unorthodox claims? Goddamn.

Excellent effort though.

That's a fuck load of quackery if I've ever seen quackery.

This will be the final nail in my religion teacher's coffin.

And yes I argue with her day to day from abortion to the bullshit of creationism. Damn catholics.

Holy wall o' text batman. I think posting it to a website and linking us there would've been easier. I read a little of it, and it just sounds like utter ridiculousness. The guy said he's a master UFO caller. I stopped not long after reading that.