gsebry
2008-10-10, 00:29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published: October 8, 2008
Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law, according to a review of state records and Social Security data by The NEW YORK TIMES.
The actions do not seem to be coordinated by one party or the other, nor do they appear to be the result of election officials intentionally breaking rules,
But are apparently the RESULTS OF of mistakes in the handling of the registrations and voter files as the STATES TRIED TO COMPLY with a 2002 FEDERAL LAW, intended to overhaul the way elections are run.
According to state election officials, any heightened screening of new applications may affect their party’s supporters disproportionately; as in the screening or trimming of VOTER registration lists in NINE states.....
This could result in PROBLEMS AT THE POLLS on Election Day: people who have been removed from the rolls are likely to show up only to be challenged by political party officials or election workers, resulting in confusion, long lines and heated tempers.......
Some states allow such voters to cast provisional ballots. But they are often not counted because they require added verification.
Although much attention this year has been focused on the millions of new voters being added to the rolls, there has been far less NOTICE given to the number of voters being DROPPED from those same rolls.
States have been trying to follow the Help America Vote Act of 2002 and remove the names of voters who should no longer be listed; but for ONE voter ADDED added to the rolls in the past two months in some states, election officials have REMOVED TWO voters.
The six SWING states seem to be in violation of federal law.
MICHIGAN, and COLORADO (anti-abortion law also) areREMOVING voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election,
WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED EXCEPT when voters DIE, notify the authorities that they have moved OUT of state, or have been declared UNFIT to vote.
INDIANA, NEVADA, NORTH CAROLINA, and OHIO seem to be IMPROPERLY using Social Security data to verify registration applications for NEW voters.
IN ADDITION, THREE MORE states appear to be violating federal law
ALABAMA AND GEORGIA seem to be IMPROPERLY using Social Security information to screen registration applications from NEW voters.
LOUISIANA appears to have REMOVED thousands of voters AFTER the federal DEADLINE for taking such action.
Under federal law, election officials are supposed to use the Social Security database to check a registration application ONLY as a last resort, IF NO record of the applicant is found on state databases, like those for driver’s licenses or identification cards.
......................
SOMETHING IS HAPPENNING HERE !!!!!!
Published: October 8, 2008
Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law, according to a review of state records and Social Security data by The NEW YORK TIMES.
The actions do not seem to be coordinated by one party or the other, nor do they appear to be the result of election officials intentionally breaking rules,
But are apparently the RESULTS OF of mistakes in the handling of the registrations and voter files as the STATES TRIED TO COMPLY with a 2002 FEDERAL LAW, intended to overhaul the way elections are run.
According to state election officials, any heightened screening of new applications may affect their party’s supporters disproportionately; as in the screening or trimming of VOTER registration lists in NINE states.....
This could result in PROBLEMS AT THE POLLS on Election Day: people who have been removed from the rolls are likely to show up only to be challenged by political party officials or election workers, resulting in confusion, long lines and heated tempers.......
Some states allow such voters to cast provisional ballots. But they are often not counted because they require added verification.
Although much attention this year has been focused on the millions of new voters being added to the rolls, there has been far less NOTICE given to the number of voters being DROPPED from those same rolls.
States have been trying to follow the Help America Vote Act of 2002 and remove the names of voters who should no longer be listed; but for ONE voter ADDED added to the rolls in the past two months in some states, election officials have REMOVED TWO voters.
The six SWING states seem to be in violation of federal law.
MICHIGAN, and COLORADO (anti-abortion law also) areREMOVING voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election,
WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED EXCEPT when voters DIE, notify the authorities that they have moved OUT of state, or have been declared UNFIT to vote.
INDIANA, NEVADA, NORTH CAROLINA, and OHIO seem to be IMPROPERLY using Social Security data to verify registration applications for NEW voters.
IN ADDITION, THREE MORE states appear to be violating federal law
ALABAMA AND GEORGIA seem to be IMPROPERLY using Social Security information to screen registration applications from NEW voters.
LOUISIANA appears to have REMOVED thousands of voters AFTER the federal DEADLINE for taking such action.
Under federal law, election officials are supposed to use the Social Security database to check a registration application ONLY as a last resort, IF NO record of the applicant is found on state databases, like those for driver’s licenses or identification cards.
......................
SOMETHING IS HAPPENNING HERE !!!!!!