View Full Version : The Bilderberg meetings.
Ok, this by itself is not a conspiracy theory, it is fact. Every few years a bunch of high-profile financiers, brokers, politicians, and CEOs meet up in hotels and such with very tight security and media blackout. This isn't debateable really, because these high-profile people have been captured on camera and identified as theyre in their cars or walking from their cars to the inside. This is not conspiracy. It's observable and verifiable.
My question is, and I only want opinions from level-headed persons, is there any other plausible explanation for these meetings? Is there really proof that the government doesn't sanction them(yeah I know logan act, but does the government really not know?)? They could be meeting for some other reason besides world domination. THAT is the conspiracy theory. Since nobody knows exactly what they're doing, there are all these suspicions.
Politicians and business men meeting? Wow! That's never happened before!
If you'd read up on this you'd know that the first ones were organised to strengthen (re-establish) the relations between the united states and europe. They continued them because they worked really well.
Politicians and business men meeting? Wow! That's never happened before!
If you'd read up on this you'd know that the first ones were organised to strengthen (re-establish) the relations between the united states and europe. They continued them because they worked really well.
Yeah anyone can deduce that. Why so much secrecy and what are they talking about?
Weird, the dutch article gives more information on that. (maybe because it was host here)
According to the dutch article the idea behind the lack of press coverage is that it makes it easier to invite people. Because nothing the participanst say will be over-analyzed later in the newspapers. I assume, this gives people the chance to really speak their mind and not bore people with their vague political bullshit stories.
You can compare it to a business club, but next to that it's also used to sort problems between nations. The other reason why media is shunned probably. The media would have a field day with various political leaders taking stabs at each other.
ComradeHS
2008-10-21, 01:48
What would they talk about?
Well first of all... Stealing from the World. Starting with the Third World countries.
Ultimate Financial Control...
Is what they want.
facedownassup2
2008-10-26, 18:34
What would they talk about?
Well first of all... Stealing from the World. Starting with the Third World countries.
Ultimate Financial Control...
Is what they want.
prove that, that is what they would talk about
droppinds
2008-10-27, 00:35
According to the dutch article the idea behind the lack of press coverage is that it makes it easier to invite people. Because nothing the participanst say will be over-analyzed later in the newspapers. I assume, this gives people the chance to really speak their mind and not bore people with their vague political bullshit stories.
It is true that the secrecy makes the meetings more productive and open I'm sure. But i mean even the G8 summit has closed door meetings and parts open to the press. This is what you see with most big meetings. And why can't the media even acknowledge its happening? I mean they dont have to bother anyone, but why the huge blackout?
prove that, that is what they would talk about
Maybe if you werent so damn lazy you could do your own damn research. And look at Jim Tucker's work on it. Or watch "End Game", or search www.prisonplanet.com. Im not saying everything said by these sources are true, im sayin do your own research and draw your own conclusions instead of hoping a totse member went to the Bilderberg meetings. There has been information that has come out of the meetings which turned out true. For example the planned invasion of Iraq. But im not gonna get into it, becuz I have some slim hope you do your own lazy research and draw your own rational logical conclusions
siegmeow
2008-10-28, 07:33
Heil hitler
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█████░░░░░░░░░███████████████████░░
░░█████░░░░░░░░░███████████████████░░
░░█████░░░░░░░░░███████████████████░░
░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░░█████████████████████████████████░░
░░█████████████████████████████████░░
░░█████████████████████████████████░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████░░░░░░░░░█████░░
░░███████████████████░░░░░░░░░█████░░
░░███████████████████░░░░░░░░░█████░░
░░███████████████████░░░░░░░░░█████░░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
immortal leader
of our race
facedownassup2
2008-10-30, 03:35
It is true that the secrecy makes the meetings more productive and open I'm sure. But i mean even the G8 summit has closed door meetings and parts open to the press. This is what you see with most big meetings. And why can't the media even acknowledge its happening? I mean they dont have to bother anyone, but why the huge blackout?
Maybe if you werent so damn lazy you could do your own damn research. And look at Jim Tucker's work on it. Or watch "End Game", or search www.prisonplanet.com. Im not saying everything said by these sources are true, im sayin do your own research and draw your own conclusions instead of hoping a totse member went to the Bilderberg meetings. There has been information that has come out of the meetings which turned out true. For example the planned invasion of Iraq. But im not gonna get into it, becuz I have some slim hope you do your own lazy research and draw your own rational logical conclusions
i didn't ask you to prove it, or for you to provide me with information on the subject. Just because I do not have the time to search the internet on the bilderberg meetings, dose not make me lazy. I have other things in my life to do, obviously, you do not.
HektikNinja
2008-10-31, 03:33
What would they talk about?
Well first of all... Stealing from the World. Starting with the Third World countries.
Ultimate Financial Control...
Is what they want.
Correct.
crazy hazy vermonter
2008-11-01, 20:31
It's probably just the world's craziest, kinkiest, gangbang and hedonistic sex party. Tuxedoed butlers carrying around golden platters full of cocaine and E, thousands of exotic women from around the world, a hotel wide party with every form of sin and debauchery imaginable, for three days.
Everyone needs to let off a little steam, especially the overlords of the human race.
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=hLP_yV89Xcw
Alex Jones is just jealous.
Name's Taken
2008-11-02, 01:20
Does this have something to do with a giant owl?
Jaguarstrike
2008-11-02, 21:02
Sounds like its time for some grassroots surveillance.
http://www.totse.com/community/showpost.php?p=10594306&postcount=8
droppinds
2008-11-03, 00:07
Does this have something to do with a giant owl?
your thinking of bohemian grove
Name's Taken
2008-11-03, 06:39
your thinking of bohemian grove
Goddamn it, why can't these cabals just have one meeting?
BobapanBeers
2008-11-07, 04:37
Ok, this by itself is not a conspiracy theory, it is fact. Every few years a bunch of high-profile financiers, brokers, politicians, and CEOs meet up in hotels and such with very tight security and media blackout. This isn't debateable really, because these high-profile people have been captured on camera and identified as theyre in their cars or walking from their cars to the inside. This is not conspiracy. It's observable and verifiable.
My question is, and I only want opinions from level-headed persons, is there any other plausible explanation for these meetings? Is there really proof that the government doesn't sanction them(yeah I know logan act, but does the government really not know?)? They could be meeting for some other reason besides world domination. THAT is the conspiracy theory. Since nobody knows exactly what they're doing, there are all these suspicions.
That last meeting I know about was in 2006 in Montreal. The federal police (RCMP)even tried to get into the building for an unrelated mater and it was absolutly impossible for them to enter. In fact they could even get close! On that particular meetin, the canadien foreign minister was invited and used 3000 $ of government money (our taxes) to pay for his dinner. Because that's government money, he was ask in parlament to justify the spending by telling the public what went on in there and what was discussed but he refused to divulge anything without giving any reasons. This is in fact illegal for an elected offical.
I also know that Prime minister Harper was also invited to a meeting less then 6 months before being elected and so has most prime ministers in canada in the past 20 years...
I don't really think they are talking about screwing every nation around the world nor how to control the world. I believe they talk about maintaining economic stability, thus the status quo, around the world. they don't want change even if it is environmental change, redistribution of ressources or war. they want stability at all cost because everyone makes more money that way. So they are somewhat evil, but not as evil as everyone thinks.
That last meeting I know about was in 2006 in Montreal. The federal police (RCMP)even tried to get into the building for an unrelated mater and it was absolutly impossible for them to enter. In fact they could even get close! On that particular meetin, the canadien foreign minister was invited and used 3000 $ of government money (our taxes) to pay for his dinner. Because that's government money, he was ask in parlament to justify the spending by telling the public what went on in there and what was discussed but he refused to divulge anything without giving any reasons. This is in fact illegal for an elected offical.
I also know that Prime minister Harper was also invited to a meeting less then 6 months before being elected and so has most prime ministers in canada in the past 20 years...
I don't really think they are talking about screwing every nation around the world nor how to control the world. I believe they talk about maintaining economic stability, thus the status quo, around the world. they don't want change even if it is environmental change, redistribution of ressources or war. they want stability at all cost because everyone makes more money that way. So they are somewhat evil, but not as evil as everyone thinks.
That's a very good explanation. I don't believe in the anti-christ NWO 666 one world government BS, but mass collusion makes a lot of sense. The way the IMF and the world bank screw over third world countries into selling their souls to western corporate interests is a good indication of their success.