9/11
Lies, Contradictions, and Cover-ups




By: Luke *******














--“The greatest trick the devil ever played was convincing the world he did not exist.”-- Charles Baudelaire


Timeline leading up to 9/11
- March 2001: Italy warns U.S. of terror attack involving hijacked aircraft
- May- July 2001: Over a two-month period, the NSA reports that “at least 33
communications indicating a possible, imminent terrorist attack.”
- May 16-17, 2001: US Warned Bin Laden Supporters inside US and Planning an Attack
- May 29, 2001: Clarke (ex US Head of Counter Terrorism) Asks for More to Be Done to
Stop Expected Al-Qaeda Attacks
- May 30, 2001: FBI Is Warned of Major Al-Qaeda Operation in the US Involving Hijackings, Explosives, and/or New York City
- June 2001: Germans Warn of Plan to Use Aircraft as Missiles on US and Israeli Symbols
- June 2001: US Intelligence Warns of Spectacular Attacks by al-Qaeda Associates
- June-July 2001: Terrorist Threat Reports Surge, Frustration with White House Grows
- Summer 2001: Threat Alerts Increase to Record High
- Summer 2001: Israel Warns US of ‘Big Attack’
- Summer 2001: Al-Qaeda Plot Described as Upcoming ‘Hiroshima’ on US Soil
- June 21, 2001: Senior Al-Qaeda Officials Say Important Surprises Coming Soon
- June 22, 2001: CIA Warns of Imminent Al-Qaeda Suicide Attack
- June 23, 2001: White House Warned ‘Bin Laden Attacks May Be Imminent’
- June 25, 2001: Clarke Tells Rice That Pattern of Warnings Indicates an Upcoming Attack
- June 28, 2001: Tenet (ex CIA Director) Warns of Imminent Al-Qaeda Attack
- June 28, 2001: Clarke Warns Rice That Threat Level Has Reached a Peak
- Late Summer 2001: Jordan Warns US That Aircraft Will Be Used in Major Attack Inside the US
- July 2001: India Warns US of Possible Terror Attacks
- July 1, 2001: Senators Warn of Al-Qaeda Attack within Three Months
- July 5, 2001: Ashcroft (ex US Attorney General) Is Warned of Imminent, Multiple Attacks from Al-Qaeda
- July 6, 2001: CIA Warns Upcoming Al-Qaeda Attack Will Be ‘Spectacular’ and Different
- July 6, 2001: Clarke Tells Rice to Warn Agencies to Prepare for 3 to 5 Simultaneous
Attacks; No Apparent Response
- July 10, 2001: FBI Agent Sends Memo Warning That Inordinate Number of Muslim
Extremists Are Learning to Fly in Arizona
- July 10, 2001: CIA Director Gives Urgent Warning to White House of Imminent, Multiple, Simultaneous Al-Qaeda Attacks, Possibly Within US
- July 16, 2001: British Spy Agencies Warn Al-Qaeda Is in the Final Stages of Attack in the West
- Late July 2001: Taliban Foreign Minister Tries to Warn US and UN of Huge Attack inside the US
- Late July 2001: Argentina Relays Warning to the US
- Late July 2001: Egypt Warns CIA of 20 Al-Qaeda Operatives in US; Four Training to Fly; CIA Is Not Interested
- Late July 2001: CIA Director Believes Warnings Could Not ‘Get Any Worse’
- August 2001: Russia Warns US of Suicide Pilots
- Early August 2001: Government Informant Warns Congressmen of Plan to Attack the WTC
- Early August 2001: Britain Warns US Again; Specifies Multiple Airplane Hijackings
- Early August 2001: Morocco warns U.S. of ‘Big Attack’ in New York by Osama’s men
- August 6, 2001: Bush Briefing Titled ‘Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US’
- August 8-15, 2001: Israel Reportedly Warns of Major Assault on the US
- August 15, 2001: CIA Counterterrorism Head: We Are Going to Be Struck Soon
- August 23-27, 2001: Minnesota FBI Agents ‘Absolutely Convinced’ Moussaoui Plans to
Hijack Plane; They Are Undermined by FBI Headquarters
- August 23, 2001: Mossad Reportedly Gives CIA List of Terrorist Living in US; at Least Four 9/11 Hijackers Named
- August 30, 2001-September 4, 2001: Egypt Warns al-Qaeda Is in Advanced Stages of
Planning Significant Attack on US
- September 4, 2001: Mossad Gives another Warning of Major, Imminent Attack
- September 10, 2001: NSA Intercepts: ‘The Match Begins Tomorrow’ and ‘Tomorrow Is
Zero Hour’
- September 10, 2001: US Intercepts: ‘Watch the News’ and ‘Tomorrow Will Be a Great Day for Us’
- September 10, 2001: US Generals Warned Not to Fly on Morning of 9/11

White House Press Secretary, Ari Fleisher --“No warnings”—

Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld –“There were lots of warnings.”—

White House Advisor, Richard Clarke –“Your government has failed you, and I have failed you”--

Global Poll on 9/11
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Seven years after the September 11 attacks, there is no consensus outside the United States that Islamist militants from al Qaeda were responsible, according to an international poll published on Wednesday.

The survey of 16,063 people in 17 nations found majorities in only nine countries believe al Qaeda was behind the attacks on New York and Washington that killed about 3,000 people in 2001.

U.S. officials squarely blame al Qaeda, whose leader Osama bin Laden has boasted of organizing the suicide attacks by his followers using hijacked commercial airliners.

On average, 46 percent of those surveyed said al Qaeda was responsible, 15 percent said the U.S. government, 7 percent said Israel and 7 percent said some other perpetrator. One in four people said they did not know who was behind the attacks.

The poll was conducted by WorldPublicOpinion.org, a collaborative project of research centers in various countries managed by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland in the United States.

In Europe, al Qaeda was cited by 56 percent of Britons and Italians, 63 percent of French and 64 percent of Germans. The U.S. government was to blame, according to 23 percent of Germans and 15 percent of Italians.

Respondents in the Middle East were especially likely to name a perpetrator other than al Qaeda, the poll found.

Israel was behind the attacks, said 43 percent of people in Egypt, 31 percent in Jordan and 19 percent in the Palestinian Territories. The U.S. government was blamed by 36 percent of Turks and 27 percent of Palestinians.

In Mexico, 30 percent cited the U.S. government and 33 percent named al Qaeda.

The only countries with overwhelming majorities blaming al Qaeda were Kenya with 77 percent and Nigeria with 71 percent.

Interviews were conducted in China, Indonesia, Nigeria, Russia, Egypt, France, Germany, Britain, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Mexico, the Palestinian Territories, South Korea, Taiwan, Turkey and Ukraine.

The poll, taken between July 15 and August 31, had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 to 4 percent.


The motives and consequences of 9/11 are the driving factor for every major political reform today, they are what shape our world and our politics. After 9/11 came the Patriot Act, the document that took away all our most basic rights that our founding fathers held most dear, fought hardest for. The very foundation of freedoms that America is built upon is being dismantled and reconstructed before our very eyes to suit the needs of those who care only about money, control, and power. Now listening to your phone conversations without a warrant is done in the name of fighting terrorism, now illegal search and seizure is done in the name of fighting terrorism, now you can be held against your will for an indefinite period of time, and without the right to an attorney, all because they call you a terrorist, now they can read your e-mails, listen to your messages, and seize your financial records all in the name of preventing an ‘attack’. But do they really care about preventing terrorism? Or let us rephrase that, are they really worried about terrorism? No. This is simply an excuse to examine, probe, and eavesdrop on those whom the most powerful in our government do not like, those who stand against them, and against their interests. Our entire foreign and domestic policy has been constructed around 9/11. After 9/11 came our wars, and from our wars came our unmovable presence in Middle East. Our hand and eye. Then came the billions lost by the American people, and the billions made by the men behind the curtain.

So what really happened on 9/11?

--“Beat me with the truth, do not torture me with lies”-- Anonymous

Part one: The terrorists

- The government states that 19 Islamic terrorists hijacked 4 planes with box cutters and plastic eating utensils. There has not been one instance, other than these four hijacking, where a plane has been commandeered with exact-o knives and sporks. But in fact, of those 19 terrorists, seven are confirmed alive and well by their respective governments and establishments, along with the FBI and our military. Three are claimed to have been seen alive by multiple witness including friends, family, and coworkers. Imagine that, back from the dead.

- --"Five of the alleged hijackers have emerged, alive, innocent and astonished to see their names and photographs appearing on satellite television. ... The hijackers were using stolen identities, and investigators are studying the possibility that the entire suicide squad consisted of impostors." – London Times, also BBC

- Abdulaziz al-Omari an engineer from Riyadh and alleged terrorist on Flight 11 –“I couldn’t believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane,”—The Telegraph, September 23rd, 2001. Also the Saudi Airlines pilot, Saeed Al-Ghamdi, 25, is furious that the hijackers' "personal details" - including name, place, date of birth and occupation - matched is own.

Men and women who question these facts state that ‘well there are plenty of people in the Middle East, and around the world, who share the same names. It is simply a case of mistaken identity,’ Now this is questionable for several reasons: 1. The men that are alive, and known to be alive by the government, are still used on our list of hijackers. Why have we not removed them? 2. Our government with all of its trillions in resources should be able to discern live men from dead men, and terrorists from non-terrorists, 3. Even though they may share the same name as others in the Middle East, and around the world, the profiles of the dead ‘terrorists’ still have the same places of birth, the dates of birth, place of residence, photos, and the occupations of these men who are alive and well. That is entirely too coincidental.

- President Bush Sr. would stay with the Bin Laden’s family when he visited the Middle East. He visited in 1998 and in 2000 on behalf of The Carlyle Group, a defense contractor. He strangely could not recall any of these visits until an invitation was shown to him. He was also in a Carlyle meeting with Osama’s older brother, Shafiq bin Laden, on the very morning of 9/11. The Carlyle Group continues to reap money off these ‘Wars on Terror’

George W. Bush –“Of course we’re after Saddam Hussein, um, uh, bin Laden”--

- Bush on Bin Laden, White House March 3rd, 2002 –“I am truly not that concerned about him,”—

- Military Chief Myers, CNN and the DOD April 6th, 2002 –“The goal has never been to get bin Laden,”--

- Bin Laden’s family live in Falls Church, VA, very near to CIA headquarters. Some of them were promptly evacuated from the country right after 9/11 when most planes were not even allowed to fly. The evacuation was approved of by top U.S. officials.

- Bin Laden family accountant, Jim Bath, handling money for those of the bin Laden family living in the United States is an old, almost lifelong, friend of Bush

- Osama bin Laden was treated in a U.S. military hospital in Dubai weeks before 9/11 occurred. While he was at the hospital, he was visited by a chief of the CIA (Larry Mitchell). The explosiveness of this story was reported throughout Europe in every country, but strangely the only report of this meeting in the U.S. was a small mention in an online article of The Wall Street Journal. Osama bin Laden was to be ‘watched closely’ and ‘looked after’ George W. Bush –“We will make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them,”—But Mr. President did we not harbor them? Osama bin Laden could have been arrested on the spot and there would have been no excuse for this ‘War on Terror’- The CIA helped fund a militant group called the Mujahideen. This was an anti-Soviet Islamic militant group whom Osama was a part of. This group, after the expulsion of the Soviets, evolved into the Taliban and al-Qaeda. In reality the CIA funded Osama bin Laden and his organization’s rise to power. Osama bin Laden was also used to fight the Serbs in the 1990’s. He was a tool, a valuable asset, being used for the United State’s interests.

- FBI neutralized and obstructed investigations conducted by organizations, and within their own bureau, into the history of these “terrorists,” frustrating ordinary citizens and FBI agents alike. Now why would the FBI halt investigations into those that killed thousands of Americans?

- The Taliban offered to hand over bin Laden, and has multiple times, if U.S. can provide evidence to back up he was behind 9/11 attacks but never handed him over because there was never sufficient evidence supplied. - CNN

- May 2001: US security chiefs reject Sudan's offer to turn over voluminous files about bin Laden and al-Qaeda. Sudan has made this offer repeatedly since 1995 -- Guardian, October 9th, 2001

- Osama Bin Laden’s most wanted poster has him wanted for everything BUT 9/11. When Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI, Rex Toome was asked --“Why is this not put on the poster? Is it because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11?”-- Rex replied --“Yes this is correct. The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned in Osama bin Laden’s most wanted poster is because the FBI has no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 9/11”—Huh, and here we thought they had it all figured out?

- Sept 23, U.S. Says it will be able to document its case against Bin Laden and release to public within several days.

- Sept 24, Ari Fleisher --“There will be hope to do this over a course of time”-- Information
has yet to be released to this day.

- Osama Bin Laden, --"I was not involved in the September 11th attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks....”—

- Bin Laden denies involvement in attacks…….three times. You would think he might be proud…..

- Original video of Bin Laden confessing to terrorism is discovered, funny thing is the man in the video, when examined closely, is significantly larger, has broader cheeks, differently shaped beard, darker skin, and a fuller nose than that of Mr. Bin Laden. Bin Laden was also reported to have had 4-10 look-alike doubles at the time. The U.S. says video is “unquestionable proof” international establishments ask “fabrication as evidence?”

- The video was released by the U.S. military in December 2001 of bin Laden confessing his role in the attacks. Yet when the video was examined closely some strange facts emerge. Along with the facts above, it was filmed without bin Laden’s knowledge, found in a house in Afghanistan, and was passed to the CIA through unknown resource. Also the German television show ‘Monitor’ did an independent translation which contradicts the U.S. military’s translation. Professor Gernot Rotter, scholar of Islamic and Arabic Studies at the University of Hamburg, --“This tape is of such poor quality that many passages are unintelligible. And those that are intelligible have often been taken out of context, so that you can’t use that as evidence. The American translators who listened to the tape and transcribed it obviously added things that they wanted to hear in many places.”—

- Dec 27. video released with Bin Laden praising attack but not claiming to have perpetrated it

- Taliban official says he attended Bin Laden’s funeral along with several other close friends and family.

- Benazir Bhutto, former Prime Minister of Pakistan, herself stated in English, on the television show Frost Over the World that Osama bin Laden was dead. She even stated the killer, --“Omar Sheikh is the man who murdered Osama bin Laden.”— Not a word was said about this from the CIA or FBI they did not confirm it, nor did they deny it. Benazir Bhutto is now dead from a suicide bomber’s attack.- U.S. Intelligence has stated that bin Laden needs dialysis every three days and, CNN --"It is fairly obvious that that could be an issue when you are running from place to place, and facing the idea of needing to generate electricity in a mountain hideout."—
- --“Israeli sources said Israel and the United States assess that Bin Laden probably died in the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan in December. They said the ‘emergence of new messages by Bin Laden are probably fabrications’ Middle East Newsline reported.”—World Tribune

Now you are asking why is this important? Why does it matter if he is in fact dead? Just think for a moment why we are in Afghanistan, and to the recent Presidential and Vice Presidential debates. They say we will not rest until we find Osama bin Laden. In other words, we are not going to even consider leaving the Middle East until we have bin Laden. But what if he is dead?

- The U.S. FBI’s counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead.

- Osama bin Laden is cornered multiple times in Jalalabad and Tora Bora, Afghanistan. Every single time, without fail, he manages to escape due to U.S. ‘military mistakes’. He leaves in a convoy from Kabul to Jalalabad with over 1,000 vehicles, the U.S. does nothing. November 14th, 2001 the U.S. captures Jalalabad, but Osama manages to escape to Tora Bora with hundreds of fighters and vehicles, the U.S. bombs the airport, but not Osama’s convoy. The U.S. then surrounds Tora Bora from three sides. There were two routes to escape the caves in Tora Bora, the U.S. bombs one. Osama bin Laden and his fighters leave through the other one.

- Gary Berntsen, CIA Field Commander gave an interview in which he explained that his operatives had tracked Osama bin Laden to Tora Bora, and in fact knew his location. He then resigned two years before his retirement so that he might release a book (Jawbreaker) detailing how the U.S. government obstructed and failed to act upon this knowledge.

- Two bags belonging to Mohamed Atta (lead hijacker) were checked in at Portland airport but failed to make Flight 11 at Boston. These bags contained a Quran, his will (why bring a will if you know you’re going to die?), 757 video tour, Arabic English dictionary

- Marwan al-Shehhi’s rental car which was found contained an Arabic flight manual, airport restricted access pass (where did he get this? And why would he need it?), documents from Hoffman aviation, and a knife.

- Satam al-Suqami’s passport was found beneath the twin towers (CBS news, FBI). How does a passport fall out of a mans pocket, fly out of an airplane going 500mph, leap out of a raging 10,000 gallon jet fuel fireball inside a building, land a safe distance away from towers, and still be intact and readable? Answer: beats me

- Hani Hanjour and the other four men on American Airlines Flight 77 were all on video setting off the metal detector at Dulles International Airport, and yet they were all cleared to board the flight even after being patted down and wanded. Simple belt that they had all forgotten to remove? Or something else?

- Majed Moqed and Nawaf al-Hazami’s ID cards were recovered from the Pentagon. Again same circumstances as above how exactly did they survive?

- Saeed al-Ghamdi’s passport and Ahmed al-Nami’s driver’s license also both recovered (“hijackers” that flew plane to Shanksville) again how exactly did they manage to do this?

- FBI says that all money wired to terrorists was wired in small amounts, and yet General Mahmoud Ahmed, leader of Pakistani intelligence (ISI) was reported to have wired Mohamed Atta 100G’s.

- Pakistani Intelligence has always had a relationship with radical Islamics, but funny thing is they have also had a longstanding relationship with our very own CIA

- Mahmoud Ahmed (leader of ISI) reportedly met with key Washington leaders (Senator Bob Brown, Porter Goss, Mr., Goss, coincidentally, was head of CIA) on the very same morning as guess what? That’s right they met on the morning of 9/11.

- Mr. Mahmoud Ahmed also met with the current CIA director, George Tenant, days before 9/11 occurred

- No inquiry was ever made into why Mahmoud Ahmed ordered 100,000 dollars wired Mohammed Atta. The commissioners report stated that the financing of the attacks was of “Little importance”. “Little importance”? The financing of the attack should have been of very great importance.

- Mahmoud Ahmed strangely retired 30 days after 9/11. Guess it took its toll on him.

- Thomas Keane, who was Chairman of 9/11 commission, when interviewed, denied this wire transfer and yet, Indian Intelligence, The Wall Street Journal, and the FBI stated that the transfer was indeed the truth.

- May 2001: The US introduces "Visa Express" program allowing any Saudi Arabian to obtain visas through their travel agent instead of appearing at a consulate in person. Five hijackers use Visa Express to enter the US. --U.S. News and World Report December 12th, 2001, Congressional Intelligence Committee October 20th, 2002

- Eight of the alleged hijackers trained to fly at U.S. MILITARY flight schools. Three hijackers actually had their places of residence and driver’s licenses registered at the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla. I mean c’mon I knew we were stupid but not that stupid…..

- Two of the terrorists lived with an FBI informant.

- These men were supposed to be ‘fundamentalist’ Muslims and were expected to be preparing for their death, praying, and worshipping, after all you must be quite religious to die for a jihadic cause. Yet they were confirmed to have visited strip clubs, gotten hammered drunk, screamed at ‘infidels’, smoked hashish, bought and ordered porn flicks, and done the naughty with a couple of good old-fashioned hookers. – San Francisco Chronicle, Newsweek.

- Also these ‘terrorists’ sent easily readable e-mails and messages detailing their plans, along with decorating their apartments with crop dusting books, flying manuals, and other paraphernalia. In short, these men did everything they could to make sure everyone knew who they were, or more to the point, who they were pretending to be.

- Four of these terrorists were reported to be on the terror watch list a year or two before 9/11 occurred, and yet when a meeting was brought up to discuss this issue it was unexpectedly canceled.

- DOD threatened to revoke security clearances to any employee that testified on a 9/11 case pertaining to information that was being withheld.

- The Bush administration resisted the formation of the 9/11 Commission for 441 days. Other investigations, such as those for Pearl Harbor, the JFK assassination, and the space shuttle disasters, all started in about one week.

- Former DOD employee claims that 2.5Terabytes of data were ordered to be destroyed. This information was all relevant to the 9/11 hijackers. (A Terabyte is 1,000,000,000,000 bytes of data and 2.5 Terabytes is roughly one-fourth of the entire Library of Congress)

So were these hijackers’ radical Islamic militants, paid terrorists, or something else entirely?

--"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison

Part Two: The War Games and Pre-9/11

Between September 2000 and June 2001 the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) would scramble fighter jets to intercept unknown aircraft 67 times with a 100% success rate. Interceptions of aircraft are routine and usually occur within 10 minutes of lost radio contact or report of imminent danger. On September 11, 2001 four commercial airliners would be hijacked, transmit no radio signal, and not one of them would be intercepted. Cynthia McKinney, six term congresswoman, Georgia --“How is it that on four separate occasions, on one day, that a trillion dollar military and intelligence infrastructure could fail?”-- George W. Bush Sept. 16th, 2001 --“Never did it occur to anybody’s thought process that the evil doers would fly, not one, but four commercial aircraft into precious U.S. targets. Never,”-- Condeleeza Rice May 16th, 2002 --“ I don’t think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the world trade center, take another and slam it into the Pentagon,” – George W. Bush April 13th, 2004 –“ Nobody in our government, at least, and nobody in the prior government could have envisioned flying airplanes into buildings on such a massive scale”-- ABC news April 19th, 2004 --“But that turns out not to be true, U.S. military planners did envision, and practice these very scenarios. As reported by USA today NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) conducted exercises with fighter jets simulating hijacked planes flown into the world trade center in the two years before the attacks. Pentagon planners also envisioned the attacks on the Pentagon five months before it happened. According to Pentagon e-mails the idea was to check response times of fighter jets, but according to the Pentagon e-mail the plan was rejected as ‘to unrealistic’,”-- Brian Ross, ABC news –“This raises questions, big questions, on NORAD’s response on the day of the attack, why despite all the exercises and the planning, jet fighters were not in place anywhere near New York or Washington”—

Plans such as this are not unprecedented.

Operation Northwoods. This operation was proposed in 1962. In this plan the U.S. would stage so called ‘attacks’ in and around Guantanamo Bay to provide an excuse to attack and invade Cuba. This plan involved: Starting rumors about Cuba over ‘intercepted’ radio, using friendly Cubans inside the base to stage attacks, starting riots at the main gate, blowing up ammunition inside the building, starting fires, sabotaging aircraft and ships on the base, bombing the base with mortar shells, sinking a ship outside the entrance, staging mock funerals for non-existent soldiers, staging a terror campaign in Miami, Florida and Washington D.C, and finally destroying a drone aircraft over Cuban waters the passengers would ,in reality, be federal agents but in reports would be college students on vacation. This aircraft would be painted and numbered as a registered civil aircraft and then switched with the actual plane. This plane would be a drone (remote controlled) and as it flew over Cuba, it would be blown up.

Along with this comes the Gulf of Tonkin incident. This was an attack on U.S. military ships in the Gulf of Tonkin. This attacked granted Lyndon B. Johnson the ability to immediately launch America into the Vietnam War without congressional approval, he was directly responsible for the killing of 58,000 Americans and over 1,000,000 Vietnamese. This event later turned out to be complete fabrication.

There are plenty of others like the Nazi’s Operation Himmler where they bombed their own institutions and blamed the Poles. Or the Russian KGB bombing its own country to put Vladimir Putin into power and justify war with Chechnya, or the Indonesian government allegedly having a role in the Bali Bombings, the Turkish bombing their own to justify retaliation on a rebel group. This ‘false flag terrorism’ has happened time and time again who is to say we would not do the same. Indeed many prominent U.S. officials have already stated that this ‘false flag terrorism’ may be used to give an excuse to wage war.

The men and women who state that the U.S. government could not have perpetrated this are dead wrong.

- One drill called Amalgam Virgo was conducted on June 1-2 2001, it simulated successful terrorist attacks, one attack simulated hijacked planes, one of them taken and flown into the capitol. The second part of the plan which was planned, but not executed, involved two pilots on the flight deck and in which FBI agents would hijack the plane and diverge it to a safe location. And on the cover of the plan? Osama Bin Laden.

- In fact multiple war games were going on, on September 11th itself. House hearing on Donald Rumsfeld 2006 –“Before Mr. Rumsfeld had to go to lunch, I asked him if the activities of the four war games being played on 9/11 impaired our ability to respond to the attacks?”-- Answer by Four-Star general Richard Myers --“The answer to the question is no, no it did not impair our ability. In fact I believe that it helped our ability to respond to the situation”— well, if it helped our ability to respond, why did we not General?

- September 11th was day two of an Operation Vigilant Guardian, this operation was executed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and NORAD. It simulated a hijacked plane in the northeastern United States.

- Vigilant Guardian was stopped after the second tower was hit, but three ‘doomsday’ planes remained in the air. Directly after the towers were hit a ‘doomsday’ plane is filmed and seen by many people flying over the most restricted airspace on Earth. The White House.

- This plane is an E4-B Air Force plane, one of the most sensitive planes in existence. It is designed to keep the government running even in the case of nuclear war, hence the ‘doomsday’. The plane disappeared right before the smoke began to rise from the Pentagon. There is no mention of this plane flying over the president’s home in the official 9/11 commissioners report.

- Operation Northern Vigilance was also taking place this very same day. Northern Vigilance was an operation that moved U.S. fighter jets into Canada to watch a fleet of Russian MIGS. Northern Vigilance also put inputs onto military radar screens, these inputs, also called phantom planes, appear to be real planes to those participating in the exercise. General Richard Meyers –“We were fighting many phantom planes that day”—

- Dick Cheney, along with ‘Jeb’ Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Steve Forbes, and other key business and political leaders, are members of the Project for the New American Century. This is an organization of political ideologues (neocons) who wrote detailed plans than included invading Afghanistan, Iraq & the Middle East. In their documentation they openly state that the public and Congress would not accept their agenda and that the transition would be a slow one “absent a catalyzing and catastrophic event like a New Pearl Harbor!”

- New York Times December 30th, 2001 -Late 1998-Early 2000: On at least three occasions, spies in Afghanistan report bin Laden's location. Each time, the president approves an attack. Each time, the CIA Director says the information is not reliable enough and the attack cannot go forward.

- Three fighter jets at an Air Force base very near to the Pentagon are flown 180miles away to a training mission in North Carolina

- NRO (National Reconnaissance Office) in Virginia was also preparing for an imminent terrorist attack that day in which a small corporate jet crashes into their building.

- On September 11th, 2001, 14 fighter jets were left to defend the entire United States. Numerous other war games were being conducted in and around New York and the Pentagon. A number of these have yet to be disclosed.

- On 9/11 the FAA grounded all flights, civilian and otherwise, although a few military planes were still allowed to remain airborne.

- A government insider says Bush authorized attacks --"This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder." --Stanley Hilton, Chief of staff for Bob Dole.

- FBI translator, Sibel Edmonds, was offered a substantial raise and a full time job in order to not go public that she had been asked by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to retranslate and adjust the translations of [terrorist] subject intercepts that had been received before September 11, 2001 by the FBI and CIA.

- Henry Kissinger is put at the head of the 9/11 commission, as the Chicago Tribune puts it –“Henry Kissinger is known best for keeping secrets from the American public then telling the truth,”— he resigned in 2002

- Former Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta at a hearing –“ During the time that there was a plane coming into the Pentagon there was a young man who would come into and say to the Vice President ‘The plane is 50 miles out, the plane is 30 miles out,’ and when it got down to ‘the plane is 10 miles out’ the young man also said to the vice president ‘Do the orders still stand?’ and the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said ‘Of course the orders still stand have you heard anything to the contrary?’”—This statement was strangely not mentioned in the commissioners, or any other, governmental report. When representatives are asked about this they claim it was a technical ‘snafu’ Dick Cheney when asked about this stated that he thought that the plane was going to hit the White House and so he and Mr. Mineta (The fact that Mr. Mineta is in the bunker with him is also strangely not mentioned in the commissioners report) were evacuated to an underground bunker. Even after two planes had already hit the twin towers and one was headed straight for Washington, Cheney failed to give the order to halt the plane. Ray McGovern 27-year CIA veteran, former U.S. intelligence officer –“Now am I prepared to believe that Dick Cheney would be capable of knowing about this kind of attack on the Pentagon for example and allowing it to happen? Well…from what I know about Dick Cheney….Yea!”—

- July 24th, 2001 Larry Silverstein, who owned WTC7, signs a 3.2 billion dollar, 99 year lease which he, releases this on the entire WTC complex. Included in the lease is a 3.5 billion dollar insurance policy, which specifically covers acts of terrorism. Larry Silverstein makes 5 billion dollars off of 9/11.

- December 1st, 1984. A remote controlled Boeing 747 takes off from Edwin’s Air Force Base and was crash landed by NASA for fuel research. It flew unmanned for 16 hours and 23 minutes. Including 10 take-offs, 69 approaches, and 13 landings. So the government, can in fact, control large jet planes remotely.

- September 6th, 2001--3,150 put options are placed on United Airlines stock. A put option is a bet that a stock will fall. That day put options were more than 4 times the daily average. Bomb sniffing dogs are pulled from the WTC and security guards end 2-weeks of 12-hour shifts.

- September 7th, 2001--27,294 put options are put on Boeing stock, more than 5 times the daily average.

- September 10th, 2001--4,516 put options are placed on American Airlines. 11 times its daily average. Also a number of top Pentagon Brass cancel their flights for the next morning. San Francisco mayor, Willie Brown, receives a warning not to fly the next morning.

- June 13th, 2001: Egyptian President Mubarak, through his intelligence services warns the U.S. the bin Laden’s Islamic terrorist network is threatening to kill Bush and other G8 leaders at their July economic summit meeting in Italy. The terrorists plan to use a plane stuffed with explosives. – New York Times, October 26th, 2001

- BBC, George Arney –“The U.S. government told other governments about the Afghan invasion in July 2001,”—

- MSNBC –“Afghanistan war plans were on Bush’s desk on September 9th, 2001.”--

- FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) had arrived on September 10th, a Monday, for a large bio-terror drill. These FEMA members would conveniently provide aid in the aftermath of the attacks.

- Larry Silverstein (owner of WTC) makes $125 million down payment on WTC Complex valued at $3.2 billion, but Silverstein insures against terrorist attack for $7 billion, a HUGE payout when 9/11 happens

- In the weekends prior to 9/11, the Twin Towers were shut down, evacuated and the power cut completely off. Employees complained such has never happened in their twenty years of working in the Twin Towers. Employees witnessed numerous foreign-looking workers carrying heavy bags of equipment into the Twin Towers.

- On September 11th, 2001 there were fourteen, fourteen, fighter jets left to defend the United States.

So let’s get this straight on the morning of 9/11 phantom planes are flown in and out of radar screens, fighter jets are flown out of the country, and planes are crashed into buildings without the least bit of military interference?

--"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on."— Sir Winston Churchill

Part Three: The Pentagon

9:37 A.M. Arlington, VA. American Airlines flight 77 allegedly crashes into the ground floor of the Pentagon. Pentagon authorities will deny that the building had anti-aircraft defense. After all who in their right mind would fly a plane into the Pentagon? The FBI arrives within minutes and the site is declared a Federal crime scene becoming their exclusive responsibility. With the help of civilians, they comb the Pentagon lawn for debris. Within hours they had confiscated every known video of the attack, and employees were threatened not to discuss what they had seen in the videos. The Pentagon is one of the most secure and filmed places on Earth and yet Pentagon officials deny that any of their cameras caught the explosion. However on March 7th, 2002 the Pentagon released five images from a security camera. For years these were the only images released showing the Pentagon being hit. Strangely in these five frames no plane is seen.

- In October 2004, a Freedom of Information Act request for other videos was filed. Special Agent Jaquelin McGuire located two other videos of the Pentagon. One from a Citgo gas station and one from the Double Tree Hotel in Arlington, Virginia. Both of these videos show no plane hitting the Pentagon. Special Agent McGuire concludes that there were 85 videos filming the Pentagon at the time of the crash. So far these are the only three that have been released. As of this day we have no clear video of a plane hitting the Pentagon.

- Hani Hanjour allegedly commandeered American Airlines Flight 77 with his men and flew a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon. Hani Hanjour entered the U.S. in 1996 to become a professional airline pilot. He would not complete a single course. Duncan Haste-Cockpit Resource Management –“(Hani Hanjour) was a weak student who was wasting our resources,”-- CNN interview with teacher –“He was kind of a waste of time, wouldn’t show up for flights on time, wouldn’t do his homework that sort of thing”-- Wes Fults-Sawyer School of Aviation –“He had only the barest understanding what the instruments there were supposed to do”-- Washington Post November 21st 2001 –“He obtained a commercial pilot’s license in April 1999, but how he did so remains a lingering question that FAA officials refuse to discuss,”-- Pan Am International – “Piloting skills so shoddy and English so inadequate that they questioned whether his pilot’s license was genuine.”-Former employee Iat Flight School –“ I’m still to this day surprised that he could have flown into the Pentagon….he could not fly at all,” – and yet the 9/11 commissioners report states that Hanjour --“Was the most experienced and highly trained pilot,”-- although one of the other alledged hijackers, Saeed al-Ghamdi, was a former Saudi fighter pilot. How could Hanjour be more experienced than him?

- Hani Hanjour had gone to Freeway Airport in Maryland to rent a small plane. However when Hanjour went on 3 test runs in the second week of August he had trouble controlling, and landing, a single-engine Cessna. Now if he couldn’t even control a Cessna this how could he have flown an enormous jet, very precisely, into the Pentagon?

- An FAA official then sits next to Hanjour in class. The official offers a translator to help him pass, but the flight school points out this is against the rules. Now why would a FAA official take an interest in helping Hanjour?

- Flight 77 was described as ‘unusually light’ Out of 188 seats, only 64 would be filled, in fact all planes hijacked on 9/11 were only at 30% capacity.

- On Flight 77, passengers on the flight were representatives from Boeing, Lockheed Martin, the DOD, the Navy, American Airlines, and the Army. Now isn’t that just a little strange? The pilot couldn’t fly worth a damn and there were employees from various flight companies and military establishments?

- October 24th, 2000: The Pentagon was in an exercise called MASCOW which simulated a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon.

- Pilot of Charles Frank Burlingame the III was the pilot of Flight 77. He graduated from the Naval Academy and was a Top Gun pilot. He devised and participated in anti-terrorist strategies in the Pentagon. He remained active in the Reserve and anti-terrorism exercises until 1996. He even participated in a version of MASCOW, in which a 757 was flown into the Pentagon. Well it looks like all that military and anti-terrorism training didn’t pay off in the slightest. Funnily enough his Flight 77 crashed into the part of the Pentagon where he used to work.

- The terrorists would have had to overpower both pilots and remove them from the cockpit in a matter of seconds to keep the plane stable. Strangely the plane gave no mayday and remained on course throughout the whole hijacking.

- Flight 77 would continue to coast off course for a whole 43 minutes until it hit the Pentagon with absolutely no military interference

- To inflict maximum damage to the Pentagon, Hani Hanjour would only have had to continue on his flight path nose down, instead he performed a 330 degree turn, dropping 7000 feet, and exposing himself for an extra three minutes, and performing a complex maneuver described by all experienced pilots as ‘nearly impossible’, requiring professional expertise. First how could he have performed this if he was such a horrible pilot? Was this maneuver done to minimize damage to the Pentagon, or merely an over-complicated, not well thought through plan?

- Five light poles were knocked down as the plane crossed Washington Blvd. Lone light poles have brought down airplanes before as the speed that the plane hits sheers the wing right off. Yet this ‘super-plane’ manages to hit five and remain on course.

- The plane manages to hit the only part of the Pentagon reinforced to withstand attacks. The side the plane hit had reinforced steel and Kevlar walls, blast-resistant Kevlar windows, automatic fire doors, and sprinklers. Had the plane struck anywhere else the casualties, and damage, would have been much greater.

- The hole in the outside wall of the Pentagon was 20 feet in diameter on the second and third floor, and had visible damage 90 feet across the first floor. The plane was reported by the government, and still is, to have bounced off the lawn and into the building. Photographs, videos, and eyewitness contradict this. Bob Pugh freelance photographer, --“There were no marks on the grass, nothing ever hit the ground, it was precision or an incredibly lucky hit, I don’t know how it hit without touching the ground going so fast”—

- You might be thinking to yourself, well there must have been people who actually saw the jet. Witnesses describe things ranging from nothing, to a Cessna small airplane, to a small business jet, to a commercial airliner. Some, at the scene, even saw a military helicopter before and after the incident. Missile? Small aircraft laden with explosives?

- An electronics warfare plane, a C-130, was also spotted by multiple witnesses following Flight 77, coincidentally this very same cargo plane wound up only 17 miles from the crash site of Flight 93 at Shanksville.

- Lloyd England’s taxi cab was hit by a knocked over light pole as the plane flew overhead. He heard the plane, and obviously felt the effects of it, and yet when he got out, strangely enough, it was quiet and there was no trace of a plane he says. Lloyd England --“If had nobody seemed to have indicated where something had happened I wouldn’t have known!” –

- Lack of damage from wings and flight stabilizer in the hole of the Pentagon, and lack of debris suggest that it may not have been a plane to hit the Pentagon. Firefighter on Fox news being asked about debris found at Pentagon –“There are some small pieces of aircraft visible from the interior, but no large sections, in other words no large fuselage sections or that sort of thing.”—“ I didn’t see any pieces of any plane, and I couldn’t believe that a plane had hit the building”--

- The government immediately started to cover the lawn after the incident, conveniently stopping any investigations form happening

- 9:38 A.M. Arlington, Virginia Hani Hanjour allegedly executes a 330 degree turn at 530 miles per hour, descending 7000 feet in 2 and ½ minutes to crash the plane into the ground floor of the Pentagon. Ruse Wittenberg, commercial and Air Force pilot who flew two of the planes used on 9/11 –“[Flight 77] could not possibly have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into high speed stall,”-- --“The airplane won’t go that fast when you start pulling those high G maneuvers. That plane would have fallen out of the sky,”— Physics do not allow these planes to perform these maneuvers.

- The Boeing 757 was made of virtually indestructible materials (Titanium, steel alloys) which cannot have simply been ‘vaporized’ as the government claims it was. Jet fuel burns at 549.5 °F, but only if the fuel source is maintained. The fuel would have burned off immediately upon impact. Titanium melts at 3034 °F and typical carbon steel melts at 2600–2800 °F although it should be pointed out that the steel in the airplane would be of a much higher grade. So jet fuel does not even burn hot enough to melt an airplane much less vaporize enormous segments as the government claims.

- A Boeing 757 is 155 feet long, 44 feet high, has 124 foot wingspan, and weighs almost 100 tons. The only damage to the outer wall of the Pentagon is a single hole. There is no sign of where the wings, vertical stabilizers, or engines hit. Fox News –“From my close of inspection it does not look like a plane hit anywhere near the Pentagon,”--

- The Boeing 757 has two Rolls-Royce RB-211 engines made of steel and titanium alloy, they are 9 feet in diameter, 12 feet long, and weigh 6 tons each. It is scientifically impossible for 12 tons of steel and titanium to be vaporized by jet fuel, even melted by jet fuel, so they should have been found relatively intact at the site of the crash. All that was found was a single turbo-jet engine (Not entire engine), approx 3 feet in diameter that was found inside the building. This piece was not part of the engine, and when Rolls-Royce and Boeing were contacted they confirmed that it was not any piece from their plane.

- A piece of the fuselage was also found at the Pentagon. Skeptics claim that this is proof a plane hit the Pentagon. But this piece could have come from any American Airlines flight. Strangely, this piece is also not burned, or scratched, after a 530 mph impact and the subsequent fireball.

- A third piece was allegedly a diffuser case. On the Boeing aircraft there are triangular vessels around the opening. The vessels on the piece found were circular. The remainder of the debris could be carried by hand.

- August 15th, 2005 Helios Airways, Flight 522, a Boeing 737, crashed into a hillside at full speed. Huge sections of plane were scattered everywhere. Along with many other plane crashes there are always large amounts of debris at the crash. Planes don’t just vanish.

- The government ID’s 184 out of the 189 victims at the Pentagon. How, if the fuel burned hot enough to vaporize an airplane, could they have identified the victims?

- As for the inside of the Pentagon, there is another hole, approx. 15 feet in diameter. It was found on the C-ring of the Pentagon, 3 rings from the impact. For this to happen, the plane would have had to smash through 9 feet of steel-reinforced concrete, traveling 310 feet. Not only could the plane not have smashed through this much material, but the hole in the C-ring is small and circular, consistent with shaped charges used in explosives.

- The Pentagon looks suspiciously like a building struck by a cruise missile or blown up by explosives. Look at photos yourself and compare them.

- Major General Albert Stubblebine, --“One of my jobs in the Army was image interpretation for scientific and technical intelligence, I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon, and I look at the size of the airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon and I said ‘The plane. Does. Not. Fit. In. That. Hole. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What’s going on?”-- said in a television interview. Within the upper echelons military itself there is much questioning…….

- People, even the Sheridan hotel 5 miles away, inside the Pentagon describe being hit by a shockwave and being thrown to their feet and across distances. One person was even thrown 100 feet into a light pole. Let me make this clear, a plane crash does not cause a shockwave. Boom, yes. Fireball, yes. Shockwave, no.

- A number of people specifically mention smelling cordite. Don Perkal, MSNBC –“Even before stepping outside I could smell cordite. I knew explosives had been set off somewhere,”— Gilah Goldsmith, The Guardian –“It smelled like cordite, or gun smoke,”— Cordite is a substance used in ammunition and explosives. Cordite and jet fuel have two very distinct smells. Cordite is cool burning, no flash, and has a strong detonation wave. So people thrown 100ft because of a crash and a fire, or because of a detonation wave?

- There were two planes that appeared after the crash. The first was uniformly identified by multiple witnesses as a C-130 military cargo plane as mentioned. The second was the unmarked white plane flying over D.C.

- 2nd explosions not only rocked the WTC they also were felt at the Pentagon. Cordite? Second explosions?

- The outer wall collapsed 20 minutes after it was hit. However our focus should be more on why this section of the Pentagon was hit. The section hit was the headquarters of Naval Operations, Naval Intelligence, and the Navy Command Center. Army personnel and accountants were killed in the attack. Important budget information was in this section of the building. 24 hours prior to this attack Donald Rumsfeld makes this statement –“According to some estimates we cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions.”— 2.3 trillion dollars? This is by no means a small sum of money. The crash at the Pentagon conveniently destroyed the money trail.

- Donald Rumsfeld’s office was on the complete opposite side of the Pentagon. If the plane had not performed the complex, impossible maneuvers described above, it would have crashed into Rumsfeld’s office. But no, the plane performs the complex and impossible maneuvers, and crashes into the part of the Pentagon farthest from Donald Rumsfeld’s office.

- According to government reports the military was unprepared for the use of commercial airliners as weapons, although in 1994 a report was filed by terrorism expert Michael Cetron stating that the Washington area was unprepared for an such an airplane attack, it even stated that a plane could indeed be used to strike the Pentagon. Can’t get more specific than that.

If the government wanted to close this once and for why do they not then release the evidence?

Why when a plane was 50 miles away that our vice president said do nothing, and continued to, up until the actual strike? Why are all of the pieces of the plane unidentifiable and able to be brought in by hand? Why does the hole in the Pentagon look like no plane hit it? Why has the government told us that there were no warnings and this was a completely new idea, when this very scenario had been envisioned years before? How was it that Hani Hanjour, a terrible pilot by all accounts, was able to perform expert maneuvers and turns? Why was it that the plane that struck minimized the damage done to the Pentagon, struck the only part of the Pentagon reinforced for these attacks, hit the only part of the Pentagon being renovated, with luckily few people, struck the Pentagon 180º from Donald Rumsfeld’s office, and conveniently eradicated financial records? Why are videos that show a ‘plane’ hitting the Pentagon not being released and the ones that do not show anything are? What are they hiding and why won’t they answer our questions?

--“The death of one man is tragic, the death of millions is strategic.”—Josef Stalin

Part Four: The Twin Towers

9:59 New York City, New York the South Tower of the World Trade Center collapses to the ground in approximately 10 seconds, 29 minutes later the North Tower follows also collapsing in approximately 10 seconds. These were the first two steel-framed sky-scrapers in history to collapse from fire.

- February 23rd, 1991. Meridian Plaza, a 37-story sky-scraper in Philadelphia burned for 18 hours across eight floors. It did not collapse. May 4th, 1988 a 62-story sky-scraper in Los Angeles burned for 3 hours and spread over 3 floors. It did not collapse. February 12th, 2005, The Windzor Building in Madrid, a 32-story sky-scraper burned for 24 hours, completely eradicating the upper 10-stories of the building. Although the top 10 floors fell, the building did not collapse. October 17th, 2004 a 56-story skyscraper in Caracas, Venezuela, built in 1976, burned for over 17 hours and spread across 26 floors. It did not collapse. February 13th, 1975 a fire broke out between the 9th and 14th floors of the North Tower. It did not collapse. At this time there were no sprinklers in the towers. The sprinkler systems would come in handy May 19th, 1975 when 7 fires struck the World Trade Centers. The South Tower had fires between the 25th and 36th floors, and the North tower had a fire on the 11th floor. They did not collapse.

- September 11th, 2001. Two 110-story sky-scrapers burn for 56 minutes over 8 floors and 103 minutes over 5 floors respectively. These were the World Trade Centers. They collapsed.

- People may argue that this collapse was due to the construction of the twin towers. The towers were composed of 200,000 tons of steel and 425,000 cubic yards of concrete. These towers were designed to withstand multiple impacts from a Boeing 707 traveling at 600 miles per hour, and even that would cause only local damage no collapse, it was also guaranteed to last under fires, hurricanes, and even a one-hundred year storm.

So no steel framed sky-scraper in history had collapsed because of fire before 9/11. These buildings had sustained much larger, longer fires than the ones burning on 9/11. Although I think we can all agree that this is a unique collapse involving planes as well. But the World Trade Centers were designed to withstand impacts from large planes as you will read. Well maybe there was some other factor let’s take a look at some more evidence.

Pancake Theory. This is the theory embraced by men and women convinced of the official theory of events. The theory in which the fire did not melt the steel, but sufficiently heated it up to cause the floors weakened from the airplane strike to drape loose and fall on top of one another causing all of the floors to rip from their steel support columns and collapse. So what you would expect from this theory is to not only see the steel support beams still standing, but to also see the floors at the bottom piled upon one another, neither of which you can see in photos and video, in which, shows the rubble completely pulverized, turned into dust, and no support columns are visible standing. The calculation for a pure Pancake Collapse, of this building, is 96 seconds, the towers collapsed in one-tenth of that time. The rate at which the WTC collapsed meant that the floors would have had to shatter at 8-10 floors per second, there is no scenario in this theory in which this is possible. In the real world a Pancake Collapse would lose speed; never would it gain speed, as it did on September 11th.

- Witness –“It sounded like 1000 little fire crackers, like the finale of the 4th of July”-- CBS News –“We just witnessed some kind of follow up secondary explosion,”— CNN –“It almost looks like one of those planned implosion,”—“As if a Demolition team had set it off, almost like when you see those demolitions of the old buildings,”— Teresa Veliz, working on the 47th floor of the North Tower when it was hit –“I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons,”-- ABC –“If you wish to bring anyone who’s ever seen a building being demolished on purpose knows that you have to get on the under infrastructure of the building,”— CBS – “If you wish to make a building like that fold in upon itself, you would need to have explosives laid on the ground, to make it fold in upon itself,”—CNN –“ The way the structure is collapsing it is not accidental, it was the result of something that was planned, it is not accidental that the first tower just collapsed and the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way. But how they accomplished this we don’t know,”—Yet, when the official explanation of a fire was released, all these media outlets were clamoring to defend it.

- Van Romero, Vice President for Research at New Mexico Institute for Mining and Technology –“My opinion is that after the planes hit the WTCs there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse,”—10 days later –“Certainly the fires are what caused the buildings to collapse,”--

- The twin towers collapsing was the equivalent of a 6.0 earthquake, simple building collapses, even ones as large as this, cause small earthquakes, 1.0-3.0, if any at all, controlled demolitions create much larger measurements. Also two seismic station around New York recorded seismic activity right before the planes even hit the Twin Towers. So what happened here?

- --“Engineers suspect that inside the building fires could have quickly reached 1000° F perhaps even 2000° F well beyond the melting point of steel.”— Government spokesman. The melting point of structural steel is 2750° F.

- Dr. Steven Jones, Physics Professor, BYU--“47 steel columns going up the core of the building, how do you get them to fail simultaneously so the core disappeared? It looked like the core columns were cut,”—photos of some core columns show some beams that look like they have been sliced through at a 45 degree angle, with molten metal on the beam.

- Officials claim that the building was not supposed to be able to withstand this. Although the people that actually worked on the building knew that these buildings could withstand the worst. ABC, Hymen Brown (Architect of WTC) –“The towers were designed to withstand 200mph hurricanes, a hundred year storm, the worst nature could dish out.”— Tall buildings are designed to withstand air accidents. Peter Wazo President of Controlled Demolitions in news interview –“When this structure was designed, it was designed to take the impact of the most state of the art airplane on our country,”— Les Robinson, Structural engineer of the WTC –“We designed this building to take the impact from a 707 hitting the building at any location,”-- Frank DiMartini, Manager World Trade Center Construction --“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it, I believe that this building could sustain multiple impacts from jetliners because structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door, this intense grid, and this plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting, it does nothing.”—Les Robertson, WTC structural engineer –“We designed the building to take the impact of a Boeing 707.”--

- John Skilling (WTC structural engineer) told the Seattle Times after the 1993 bombing that if a plane struck the building there would be a horrendous fire but the building would still stand

- NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) investigates disasters like this and reports back to the government. NIST hired Under-Writers Laboratory to recreate the disaster. They found out right away that these same size recreations of WTC did NOT collapse under fire. NIST --"The results established that this type of assembly was capable of sustaining a large gravity load, without collapsing for a substantial period of time relative to the duration of the fires in any given location on September 11th,"—If you don’t feel like reading, it states that the same size reconstructions of the WTC do not collapse from fire, thereby disproving the official ‘pancake theory’.

- Think about this for one moment. The central idea for the buildings collapse is the intense heat that weakened and deformed the support columns. Now the jet fuel would have burned off almost immediately, but it would have spread over several floors igniting various materials before it quickly burned off. Now I think I am correct in assuming that glass, steel, and concrete do not burn. What would have been left to create this enormous amount of heat? Wood. In an open air fire, wood can burn up to 1200º F, but only if the oxygen is not depleted and if the fire has been burning uncontrolled. The fires in the buildings lacked oxygen, and were under a certain amount of control by fire fighters and the building’s construction itself.

- Except for debris that was blown outwards, the towers fell into their own footprint minimizing damage to important surrounding buildings.

- The towers fell at near free fall speed. This means that if you dropped a billiard ball from the top of the tower it would reach the ground at the same time. We would expect from a collapse for each floor to crash into the next stalling the speed of the collapse. Professor Steven Jones PhD, Los Alamos Laboratories –“Our conclusion is that the buildings should not have fallen that rapidly if indeed fire caused the collapse,”--

- Molten metal exceeding 2000° F was discovered in the rubble underneath the WTC’s, even though it rained multiple times, and was bombarded with fire-retardants. Why would there be molten metal if the fire wasn’t hot enough to even melt steel? These pools and fires of molten metal would not be extinguished until Dec 13th, 2001. Another property of steel is that it does not get hotter than the source heating it, therefore the steel should not, could not, have melted from the fire within the building. So what did it melt from?

- Slurry walls, were built under the WTC to keep out water from the Atlantic Ocean and Hudson River. These ‘bath tubs’, as they were called, held seven levels of parking garages, maintenance rooms, and The New Jersey Path Train Station. After 9/11 the three foot thick slurry walls were found to have moved 18 inches inward, and the floors to have collapsed. If the towers indeed came down in a ‘Pancake collapse’ these slurry walls should have not moved. They had always borne the weight of 110 floors, but something happened under the towers to shift them. But what happened? What force could have moved so many stories underground?

- In the 1993 WTC bombings 1500 pounds of explosives were detonated in the basement of the Towers. The support beams were unscathed and the building stood as it always stood. It just goes to show how well built these towers were and how they could withstand just about anything thrown at them.

- Now you’re asking well why would they have wanted to blow out the basements, what purpose would it serve? If the basements had not been blown out, 2,000,000 tons of debris would have had no where to go but out. But since the basement was blown, all of the debris could fill that space up. Jack Loizeaux, Controlled Demolitions Inc. –“To take a building and break it up into millions of pieces, and put it in its basement.”--

- Peter Goss, NIST –“I know of no molten steel on the site, I was on there,”-- Fire fighters –“You would get down below and you would see molten steel, molten steel, running down the channels,”—Ken Holding (Department of Design and Construction) –“It was still so hot that molten metal dripped from the walls,”— the firefighters and others, along with NASA who found extremely hot patches of molten metal exceeding 2000º F, using thermal imaging, underneath the rubble. Let me make this clear, fire does not melt steel

- NIST also reports that very few of the steel samples taken were exposed to temperatures higher than 482º F (250º C), not even close enough to bring down a building.

- One minute and 20 seconds before collapse, copious amounts of white smoke pour out from the base of the towers.

- Official reports state that the airplane impacts knocked off the old asbestos, spray-on, fireproofing. New fire-proofing was put onto the Centers after the 1993 bombings. Does paint come off in sheets simply because you hit it with a sledge hammer? Fire obviously could not have caused the fire-proofing to come off, and the plane could not have knocked every bit of the fire-proofing off. The fact of the matter is that knocking-off of fire proofing could not have happened the way they said it did.

- Even if the planes had somehow managed to penetrate the core of the building there would have been nothing left to burn after the jet fuel was gone. The core was only composed of elevator shafts and maintenance rooms, nothing to heat up the core columns to initiate a collapse.

- As the Twin Towers collapse you can hear a very large explosion directly before they fall. If the explosion was due to the towers collapsing it would only make sense that you hear the explosion as, or directly after, it collapses. No. Instead you hear this explosion before the collapse. Many people try to state this was simply a diesel generator, propane tank, or something along those lines. If this is correct, we assume because the explosion happened seconds before the collapse, that it was a generator, or related object, caused the collapse. But this cannot be true because generators were not on fire, nor could they have in any way have helped bring down the building. So what were these explosions?

- The smoke pouring from the WTC is a testament to itself of how fire could not have brought down the WTC. Smoke is a sign of an oxygen starved environment, and is an indication that the fire is failing or stuttering. Smoke from the WTC was black from many places, indicating that the fire was not only lacking oxygen, but cool burning as well.

- The towers came down in perfect symmetry, in other words too strait. This was not possible for scattered unsymmetrical fires to heat the steel so uniformly, that all of the beams simultaneously failed and brought the building down in a perfect collapse.

- Small, iron-rich spheres were also found in the rubble. The fact that these are spherical indicates that the material was once molten and then ejected from the building.

- Molten metal was filmed dripping from the windows right before the collapse. I state again the fire could not melt industrial strength steel.

- Thermite is a substance used in controlled demolition. It is a mix of Aluminum powder and iron oxide, when this substance is ignited it burns extremely hot (in excess of 4500ºF). Thermite could cut through the steel beams of the WTC like a hot knife through butter. Indications that thermite was used have not only been observed in the photographic and filmed evidence (sliced colums, molton metal before and after collapse) but traces of Thermate has been found at the WTC. Thermate is Aluminum powder, iron oxide, and sulfur all mixed together. The sulfur lowers the melting point of steel, makes the thermite burn hotter, and speeds up the reaction. Sulfur traces have been found at the WTC, although it is argued that this could be residue from materials from the building, also when the reaction occurs the Aluminum gives off a white smoke, which is exactly what happened at the WTC. The sliced columns are indicative of thermite use, along with molten metal before, and weeks after, the collapse, sulfur traces, iron-aluminum rich spheres, white smoke, steel and concrete fused together, and the fact that all the debris was immediately shipped out preventing further analysis. So was thermite used in conjunction with other explosives?

- Pyroclastic clouds raced down city streets after collapse. Now pyroclastic clouds generally occur after two events. Volcanic eruptions and controlled demolitions.

- Thousand pound steel beams flew laterally hundreds of feet into the street and other buildings. If it was simply a collapse why were beams flying so fast and so far away from the building? Would simple fire have enough power to eject huge chunks of metal larger than the planes themselves?

- Steel beams were found in the aftermath that were bent a large amount, without any cracks, buckling, or tearing in the iron. To bend steel to this magnitude and without cracks or breaks, buckling and tearing, you need an enormous amount of heat, which the fire did not posses. Very large pieces of iron fused with concrete were also found. Again the fires in the WTCs were no where near capable of doing this.

- Windows on sides of buildings hundreds of feet away are blown out. Building collapse would not cause windows to simply explode.

- Fire fighters and the witnesses all heard secondary explosions before the collapse. Reporters on various news stations all report technical difficulties from the secondary explosions. Police officers asked say they “do not know anything about the second explosions.” Dan Rather –“We presume because of the initial explosion, there may have been secondary explosions as well detonated in the building by these terrorists,”-- Witnesses --‘To me it sounded like, like an explosion’, ‘as though it exploded’, ‘picked me up off my feet and threw me’, ‘another explosion?’ Fire fighter –“There was probably a secondary device planted”-- Witnesses on the street, reporters, police officers, fire fighters, and the people evacuated from the buildings themselves all heard and described these second explosions.

- People inside of the WTC all describe the secondary explosions to be on the ground floors or from underneath the building.

- FDNY Fire Safety Chief, Albert Turi, in an interview with NBC on the day of 9/11 stated
that he thought explosive devices were planted in the buildings.

- Numerous fire-fighters and police officers all describe the secondary explosions. –“The lobby looked as though a bomb had exploded there,”—All of the fire-fighters at the scene remember the lobby of the North Tower as being completely destroyed. But nothing ever happened to the lobby. So why was the lobby completely decimated?

- Dan Schroeder, fire fighter, —“I was in the lobby and the elevator exploded in a fireball like something out of a Bruce Willis movie, it was like what is going on here somthins up here. The plane’s up there and now they’re flying it down here??”— He was in the stairwell of the second WTC and describes the lobby before it collapsed --“It looked like a bomb went off in the lobby, there was no fire, just looked like a bomb went off”-- --“It wasn’t from the jet fuel. No. Way.”-- Now the plane hit the top did it not? Why would the lobby be blown out?

- Also multiple ‘squibs’ are seen and filmed as the Twin Towers collapse. ‘Squibs’ are jets of air and debris that burst from buildings during demolition. Now the men and women going with the official theory of events state that these ‘squibs’ are ‘illusions of squibs’, and simply the result of the high air pressure within the building pushing air and debris out of the windows as it collapses. This is not true. If this ‘air pressure’ theory is true the air and debris should have taken the path of least resistance, which it did not. There were many large holes in the WTC in the lower corner and upper center of the building which the air and debris could have taken. The ‘squibs’ were filmed ejecting debris out 20, 40, and even more than 60 stories below the actual collapse, it this ‘air pressure theory’ does not explain why the ‘squibs’ were ejecting so far from the collapsing part of the building. Also the squibs were shooting out at ‘key’ points on the building, in other words the most reinforced parts of the towers that were supposed to be protecting it from collapse. The air and debris should also have raced out of the ground floor of the building as it was collapsing, as it did, because large amounts of smoke and debris was observed pouring out of the building, contradicting the theory of pressure buildup.

- So how was the wreckage from the WTC treated? It was mostly shipped overseas halting
any independent investigations or testing. FEMA was not even granted free access to
ground zero.

- Another interesting fact is that Mr. Larry Silverstein who owned the WTC complex couldn’t make it to work that day. Luck of the devil I guess.

But wait it takes weeks to demolish a building, how could have they done this?

- The security in the Trade Centers was significantly cut in the weeks prior to 9/11. Also mandatory evacuation drills were conducted for the employees of the WTCs. Many of them describe men in black, along with ‘maintenance’ crews, carrying duffel bags into the buildings when the rest of them were forced to leave. The employees complained of this because these evacuations and drills never occurred with this frequency. Prior to 9/11 numerous floors of the WTC would be shut-down because of ‘maintenance’, these shutdowns of various floors before 9/11 rendered security measures and video surveillance useless. Bomb sniffing dogs were also abruptly removed from the WTC five days before 9/11. So, before 9/11 a very unusual number of well documented power outages, security cuts, floor shutdowns, and multiple evacuations occurred. Perfect opportunities.

- Scott Forbes heard strange noises on the 98th floor above him in the weeks leading up to 9/11 –“It was like rebuilding work going on upstairs.”—“The tenants, the people from Aon who had been there, were moved somewhere else.”—“There was a lot of heavy machinery work going on up there…it was almost like pneumatic drills and a lots hammering. The floors were shaking that’s how noticeable it was”—“It was almost as if something heavy was being moved, and it was being taken off wheels, and it was like BOOM. Our floor underneath literally shook”—“On one occasion I opened the door to see what was going on, you know being nosey, and the whole office space was just empty, nothing there….it was quite bizarre.”-- “The week leading up to 9/11 I would come in and the dust was incredible! I mean it was filthy. It was like the cleaners weren’t cleaning…..and the dust would appear on the windowsill, it was dirty gray and very, very noticeable in that week leading up to 9/11. Where was that dust coming from?”—What were they doing and what was this dust? Had something on the floors been drilled?

- [George W.] Bush’s brother, Marvin Bush, and his cousin, Wirt Walker III, were principles in the company [Stratesec, formerly named Securacom] that was in charge of security for the World Trade Center, with Walker being the CEO from 1999 until January 2002.” Stratesec was also in charge of security for United Airlines and Dulles International Airport.

- John O’Neill formerly worked for the FBI as a counter-terrorism expert, but he quit his job as deputy-director because his investigations into al Qaeda were being obstructed. He then became head of security for the WTC. Three weeks later he was killed in the attacks.

- William Rodriguez was master janitor at the North Tower. He was the last person to leave the buildings alive. Mr. Rodriguez attained a semi-celebrity status as he was a hero that day and was interviewed numerous times. As he was running around helping people get out, the second explosions went off. At the time he assumed that bombs were planted by terrorists, but as soon as he pushed for an investigation all his statements were censored and he was no longer interviewed. Rodriguez actually describes explosions in the sub-levels right before the actual plane strikes. Along with Scott Forbes, as Rodriguez was going up the stairs on 9/11 to rescue people, he describes himself going past the 34th floor of the WTC and hearing something like loud machinery being moved and used. He did not go to check it out because the 34th floor was a construction floor, completely barren, in the WTC and it was off limits to normal employees and you had to have a key to get to it. Finishing touches before collapse?

- Recovery experts extract data from 32 WTC computer drives revealing a surge in financial transactions. Illegal transfers of over $100 million may have been made through some WTC computer systems immediately before and during the disaster. –Reuters, CNN

So were these buildings brought down by planes and fires the building was built to withstand? Or was there another factor in this impossible collapse?

--"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings.”-- Lauro Aguirre

Part Five: Shanksville

10:03 A.M., Pennsylvania United Flight 93 allegedly flies into an abandoned strip mine at 580mph, 20 minutes from Washington D.C. The official story is that passengers on the plane overthrew the hijackers and sacrificed themselves to prevent further casualties. Debris from Flight 93 was found a considerable distance from the crash site. No debris found was larger than a briefcase. From the mayor to the coroner to the witnesses and reporters every single one of them would remark how little debris there was at the crash site.

- Department of Environmental Protection. --“It is difficult to believe that a large Boeing 757 aircraft plunged into the ground with such force that the plane literally disintegrated and created a still smoldering crater,”— Planes do not simply ‘vanish’ or ‘disintegrate’ when they hit the ground. There are enormous pieces of the plane, wings and fuselage, when it crashes. Look at some plane crashes yourself. This is the only plane in history that seems to have disintegrated on impact. Boy, this day was full of firsts wasn’t it?

- Fox News –“I’ve seen the pictures, it looks like nothing is there except for a hole in the ground”—Fox photographer on scene –“Basically that’s right, the only thing you could see from where we were was a big gouge in the earth and some broken trees”— Fox asks—“Any large pieces of debris?”—Photographer –“No, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there,”—

- Wally Miller, Somerset Country coroner –“It looked like somebody just dropped a bunch of metal out of the sky”— Miller, Washington Post Interview –“It looked like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped trash into it,”—as for the passengers –“I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there,”—Wally Miller, Pittsburg Review –“I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop,”—

I want to take this moment to urge you to take a look at some plane crashes. Go on just check out a few. Now compare them to pictures you find of Shanksville. What do you see? Or rather what do you not see?

- Papers, I.D. cards, and passports from passengers and pilots were recovered from the scene. So although the plane managed to obliterate itself, paper and plastic managed to survive.

- The government has released pictures of a turbine and two small pieces of fuselage. It is not specified where those were found, nor if they were even part of the same plane.

- The grass around the hole was not even scorched. You would think with those thousands of gallons of jet fuel pouring out that there might be some large fires in the area.

- The FBI refused families requests to listen to cockpit recordings. But the FBI gave in on April 18th, 2002 as long as the victim’s families didn’t talk about it, or record it, and for some strange reason the last 3 minutes were unaccounted for. No explanation has been given.

- The 9/11 Commission concludes that the military was not informed of Flight 93 until 10:07 A.M., minutes after it had crashed.

- Barry Lighty, Mayor of Indian Lake, veteran of U.S. Navy –“It sounded like a missile was going across our house it was going so fast, I have no idea what it was, Oh I know is definitely was not the aircraft. No. It’s hard for me to believe that they did not know about that aircraft until 10:07,”—

- Ernie Stull, Mayor of Shanksville, told German television –“There was no plane”-- --“My sister and a good friend of mine were the first ones there. They were standing on a street corner in Shanksville talking. Their car was nearby, so they were the first here—and the fire department came. Everyone was puzzled, because the call had been that a plane had crashed. But there was no plane.”—

While specific details vary, the explanation for the disappearance of the plane is that the reclaimed land acted like liquid and absorbed the aircraft, which is said to have impacted at between 450 and 600 miles per hour.

First of all I do not think it is normal for ground to act like a liquid, even if it has the softest of soil. Second, liquid being struck at high speeds is very much like a solid, just try jumping off a high dive. Third, this explanation is often used to describe why there was only a brief explosion with a short lived smoke cloud. The brief explosion and short lived smoke cloud is not unlike a bomb blast. Fourth, this explanation does not explain why pieces of the pane allegedly ‘bounced’ into the woods.

- But after 9/11 the military was telling a completely different story. That Flight 93 was being tracked. Brigadier General Montague Winfield –“The decision was made to try and go intercept Flight 93,”-- Colonel Marr commander of Air Force base in Rome, New York –“ The order was clear as day, we will take lives in the air to save lives on the ground,”— Jets were commanded to shoot down Flight 93. But no shots were ever fired.

So wait if Flight 93 didn’t go down in Shanksville where might it have gone?

- Cleveland, Ohio. At 11:43 on September 11th, WCPO a local T.V. station in Cincinnati reported that two airplanes landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport due to a bomb threat. United Airlines identified one of the airplanes as Flight 93. Confused? Well it gets better.

- At approx. 10 A.M. Cleveland Hopkins Airport was evacuated amidst rumors that a hijacked plane was going to land. Passengers had to leave, but they couldn’t drive they had to walk or hitchhike. Buses weren’t allowed to leave and people were sent home.

- According to Associated Press Flight 93 landed in Cleveland at 10:45 A.M. they had already searched the other plane, Delta 1989, for two hours when Flight 93 landed. Delta arrived at 10:10 A.M. and was evacuated at 12:30 A.M. Flight 93 was evacuated at 11:15 A.M.

- Reports say that Delta was taken into FAA HQ, but reports for Flight 93 state that passengers were taken into NASA’s Glen Research Center, which was located near the west end of the airport and had already been evacuated.

So Delta 1989 landed and was evacuated 2 and a half hours later, Flight 93 landed and was evacuated within half an hour with passengers quickly being taken to a NASA research center.

The government has told us that ‘95% of the plane was recovered’. They stated this years after the fact. Well where is it? Where are the photos of anything more than scrap metal and random pieces of plane? They have yet to release the photos of the ‘95% of the plane’.

So what actually happened to the plane that was never found? Did jets shoot it down? Or did American citizens overpower terrorists?

--“It is error alone which needs the support of government, truth can stand by itself.”—Thomas Jefferson

Part Six: The Planes

The most brilliant thing about our military is its ability to respond to any situation in a matter of minutes. The planes hijacked on 9/11 were known to be hijacked for some time before the military was even notified. Even after the military was notified they had plenty of time to react. So if defense is the number one priority of our country why did we not defend?

- One fact is that phones are not supposed to work at this altitude at that time, although calls could go through the percentages were miniscule (.002%-5% something along those estimates), and even if calls did go through they would be dropped almost immediately and be of very bad quality. But strangely calls on the plane went through with almost no drops and were of very good quality. Also some of these calls sounded well, very unusual. Look them up and see for yourself.

Flight 11

- At 7:59 A.M. Flight 11 took off from Logan Airport, contact was lost 14 minutes later. Although it takes seconds to punch in the four digit distress signal used by the pilots in case of a Hijacking, Pilot Ogonowski did no such thing.

- Boston Air Traffic Control watches as Flight 11 turns off its friend or foe signal and its transponder, which signals the plane’s exact location and altitude, before veering off the flight path. By 8:21 it should have been crystal clear that Flight 11 had a problem.

- Flight 11 turned off its transponder right next to an area with no primary radar coverage.

- 8:26 A.M. Flight 11 makes an unexpected 100 degree turn to the south and this statement is allegedly broadcast. Mohamed Atta (From cockpit recording) –“We have some planes. Just stay quiet, and you’ll be okay. We are returning to the airport. Nobody move. Everything will be okay. If you try to make any moves, you will endanger yourself, and the airplane. Just stay quiet,”—Now why would Mohamed Atta reassure the people he was about to kill? Why would he tell them that they were returning to the airport? Simply getting them to calm down even after it was clear they were not going back to the airport, or something else?

- 8:34 A.M. Boston Air Traffic Control finally reaches the military at Otis Air Force Base. They also contact an Air Force base in Atlantic City where two fighter jets are already dispatched on a training mission in New Jersey, although minutes from New York City, they are not diverted.

- 8:37 A.M. The Northeastern branch of NORAD is finally contacted. Boston Air Traffic Control –“We have a hijacked aircraft heading towards New York City, we need someone to scramble some fighter jets,”— NORAD –“Is this real world or exercise?”—BATC –“No this is not an exercise, not a test,”—

- Major James Fox, NORAD –“I’ve never seen so much real-world stuff happen during an exercise”—

- 8:52 A.M. Fighter jets are finally scrambled. Six minutes after Flight 11 slammed into the North Tower.

So why was Flight 11 not intercepted? The 9/11 Commission claims there was simply not enough time. Not true. Not only should the military have been notified by 8:21, but even if they were only notified by 8:37 fighter jets should have reached the plane long before 8:52. So where is the president through all of this?

The president was in his limousine on the way to Booker Elementary School. Before entering the building he is aware that one of the towers has been struck by a plane. In fact Bush would claim, on national T.V., more than once, that he witnessed the first strike on live television outside of the classroom. This is impossible. The video of the first tower being struck was not broadcast until later that evening. So did he see a video that the American public has yet to see? Or did he simply forget the most important day of his term?

Flight 175

- 8:13 Flight 175 takes off from Logan airport. At 8:42 it makes a drastic turn off course. According to NORAD’s official report they were notified at 8:43 that Flight 175 was hijacked. The 9/11 Commission will deny this entirely.

- 8:37 Flight 175 turns off its transponder for several minutes and then turns it back on using a different signal. Already far off course, it makes a U-turn towards New York. 15 minutes before impact it should be clear that something is wrong with Flight 175.

- Flight 175 turned off its transponder right next to Flight 93 that crashed into Shanksville. Both of these planes turned off their transponders in an area with no primary radar coverage.

- 3 minutes after the second plane hit the Twin Towers Bush was notified. Yet he still continued to read “My Pet Goat” for the next half-hour, even when a third plane is in the air and suspected to be hijacked, then addressing the American public from the school. How could the Secret Service allow this to happen? The official story is that ‘he did not want to panic the third graders’, but I really doubt third graders would care if the President had to leave. In contrast cabinet members are swept up and taken to secure locations. Also, President Bush’s itinerary had been public knowledge since September 7th. How could Booker Elementary School not be considered a target?

Flight 77

- 8:21 Flight 77 takes off from Dulles International Airport.

- 8:50 Air Traffic Control loses contact around the Ohio-Kentucky border and 4 minutes later it starts turning off course. Flight 77’s transponder is shut off right next to an area with no primary radar coverage (Why does this keep on happening?), and it disappears completely from radar

- Indianapolis flight controllers begin notifying government agencies that Flight 77 is missing, and possibly crashed. Yet they do not notify the FAA or NORAD.

- 3 F-16’s from Langley Air Force Base, 165 miles from the Pentagon, finally go airborne at 9:30. They are ‘accidentally’ directed over the Atlantic Ocean, and will not return to D.C. another half-hour. Had the fighters traveled less than half full speed, in the right direction, they would have reached the Pentagon before it was struck.

Norman Mineta, former Secretary of Transportation under Bush –“ When you see one thing happen that’s an accident, when you see two of the same thing occur, that’s a pattern, but when you see three of the same thing occur, it’s a program,”—

--“Any excuse will serve a tyrant.”-- Aesop

Part Seven: World Trade Center 7

In 1984 the construction on World Trade Center Building 7 had begun. It opened to the public in 1987, and took up an entire city block. It housed offices for the Department of Defense, Security and Exchange Commission, and the IRS. Building 7 was considered the CIA’s largest station outside of Washington D.C. and was also the Secret Service’s biggest field office. That evening, on 9/11, at 5:20 World Trade Center building 7, 47 stories tall, collapses to the ground in less than 7 seconds. The official explanation is that falling debris from the North Tower created a series of fires inside the building which caused it to collapse. If this is true it would be the 3rd steel-framed sky-scraper in history to completely collapse because of damage and fire. The first two were the twin towers. Numerous cases would be closed due to its destruction.

- Another pointer of how little the American public knows about 9/11 can be gauged from the fact that the vast majority of people in this country are not even aware how many buildings fell on 9/11. And those that are will most likely never have seen the 4th and final building to fall that day, World Trade Center 7, collapse. It is unprecedented, that in an age where information travels so freely, that so many people are unaware of one of the most rudimentary facts of the most newsworthy day of our lives.

- On June 8th, 1999: Rudolf Giuliani’s command center was opened in WTC7. It was bulletproof, blast-resistant, fire-proof, and had reinforced walls, its own water supply, immediate contact to fire, rescue, and police forces, three diesel generators, and was staffed around the clock. It handled every disaster from hurricanes to terrorism. CNN –“Although New York officials say their building is not impenetrable, they’re confident it could handle even the worst crisis imaginable,”—

- Late 2001 was “the height of the investigation into Enron, so the majority of Enron’s SEC filings were likely destroyed when WTC7 came down.”

- Strangely Mayor Giuliani did not go to his Command Center – with its clear view of the Twin Towers – but to a makeshift, street-level headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, the day of 9/11.

- Hours before the WTC attacks the building’s alarm systems would be placed on alarm status. NIST report –“Any alarms that are received from the system are ignored”—

- After the second plane strikes the South Tower the buildings power is shut off and its tenants are evacuated.

- In a strange coincidence as to the collapse of WTC7 is the astounding revelation that BBC and CNN both reported the collapse of this building while it was still standing, and in the case of BBC, while the reporter was standing in front of it. Just a lucky guess then.

- Fires start on several of the buildings floors. At around 5:07, BBC says that the building has already collapsed. This is some of the most damning evidence yet. As BBC goes to reporter Jane Standley live –“This whole downtown area has been completely sealed off,”— WTC7 is clearly seen in the background still, in fact, standing. Where did CNN and BBC get this information considering the building was still standing behind their reporters?

- CNN at approx. 4:10, a full hour before WTC7 collapses –“We are getting word that a third World Trade Center has collapsed, or is collapsing.”--

- The building collapsed at 5:20 P.M. the collapse of the structure takes approx. 6.5 seconds, which is free fall speed. It collapses symmetrically into its own footprint barely damaging surrounding buildings. It also creates a pyroclastic cloud.

- In the words of top Dutch implosion expert in a Dutch interview, expert Danny Jowenko –“This is controlled demolition. Absolutely certain. This is a hired job done by a team of experts,”— Or Hugo Bachman from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology –“In my opinion, WTC7 with the utmost probability was brought down in a controlled demolition by a team of experts,”— along with countless other experts all agree.

- It is assumed by government officials that the building’s diesel fuel tank played a role in the collapse. Although FEMA states –“The specifics of the fires in the WTC7 and how they caused it to collapse remain unknown at this time,”—

- The ball is then handed to NIST for investigation of the collapse of this building. To this day NIST has yet to release its full report.

- Sadly by this time all steel had been removed from the World Trade Centers, and none was recovered at WTC7 to be investigated. This is illegal. How convenient.

- Building 3, a 22-story building directly below the Twin Towers was split in half by the South Towers collapse, although the building was severely crushed by tons and tons of debris. The structure remained standing.

- Building 4, a 9-story tower east of the South Tower was almost completely destroyed. The remaining structure did not collapse.

- Building 5, a 9-story building east of the North Tower suffered from severe fires and structural damage. It did not suffer from complete collapse.

- Building 6, an 8-story building between the North Tower and Building 7. It suffered from a large gouge in its roof and severe fires. It did not suffer from complete collapse.

- Neither did the DeutscheBank building which suffered from severe fires and structural damage. It still stands today and is currently being demolished beam by beam.

- Neither did the Millennium Hotel across the street.

- WTC Building 7 suffers from fires and structural damage to its South face. It collapses completely.

- Well did anything happen inside the building to make it collapse completely? Man inside building –“We started walking down the stairs to get to the 8th floor, big explosion, threw us back into the 8th floor, I turned my head and said this is it,”-- Frank Ucciardo –“I was up in management on the 23rd floor when all the power went out in the building, another gentleman and I walked down to the 8th floor where there was an explosion and we were trapped on the 8th floor with smoke all around us, the building collapsed and hour and twenty minutes later”—These two men’s accounts are mentioned in NIST, although they claim that this was the collapse of Building 7, not an explosion. Blatant lie.

- This building had 88 steel support beams holding it up. For the building to collapse the way it did, all of these beams would have had to all fail simultaneously.

- Molten metal, like that of the Twin Towers, was found in the basement of the collapsed building with temperatures exceeding anything normal fires could cause.

- In the video of the fall Building 7’s central support columns collapse, a classic ‘crimp’ or ‘wedge’ in the center of the building, and explosive switches (A line of small explosions going up the side of the building being blown) are filmed and observed. The buildings rubble is almost completely confined to its block, dust streams out of the top of the building right before the collapse. Along with collapsing at free fall speed, falling very smoothly, and into its own footprint, these characteristics are all the very unique to a controlled demolition.

- Larry Silverstein in an interview with PBS states –“I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me that they were not sure that they were going to be able to contain the fire. So you know I said ‘well we’ve had so much terrible loss of life the smartest thing to do is to pull it’ and then that decision was made to pull, and we watched the building collapse.”— ‘Pull’ is a term used by building demolishers that means to ‘pull’ down the building. Silverstein Properties now tell us that its owner was referring to the team of fire-fighters that were in the building, and that the decision was made to ‘pull’ them. However according to FEMA, NIST, and Fire Chief Frank Felini, there were no fire fighters in the buildings, they were ordered out at 11:30 that morning.

- Tim Keane (9/11 Commissioner Chairman) when asked about why this building is not even mentioned in the Commissioners report says –“I don’t know what you’re talking about, it collapsed later on and there was no loss of life, it doesn’t matter,”—

- The wreckage of this building was sold and shipped to China immediately, making it conveniently impossible to analyze. Bill Manning, Editor-in-Chief, Fire Engineering magazine, --“I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall.”-- -- “For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions … is on the slow boat to China …”—

- FEMA and NIST withdrew the claim that fire and structural damage caused WTC7 to collapse, they then proposed a theory that oil tanks caused the building to collapse, but they withdrew that to. Then they said it was built incorrectly, but they retracted that. Now they say they have no clear idea of how WTC7 collapsed.

So we have a 47-story building which housed numerous Government agencies and important information. It was damaged far less than the other WTC buildings, and at 5:20 P.M. all structural elements fail simultaneously and it collapses perfectly into its own footprint, causing little or no damage to other buildings, but also destroying everything inside of the building. The building’s collapse is claimed by the government to be caused by a combination of fire and structural damage caused by the impacts of the planes into the twin towers. Did any other buildings around the World Trade Centers suffer a complete collapse, or even a fall?

--"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."-- George Orwell

Part Eight: Doubt

--“This is not a fringe phenomenon, it is a mainstream political reality.”—Time Magazine

- Andreas von Bulow, former German defense minister, former head of German Secret Service—“They organized it or were part of organizing it, and the way it happened is so strange and the unwillingness of the Administration to clear up all the [confusion] is so strong that I have finally come to the conclusion that it must be a steered operation. I don’t believe it was bin Laden, I don’t believe it was al-Qaeda I think it is all brought up by continuous faking of intelligence, and propaganda.”--

- Bob Bowman (D-Florida), Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations, former U.S.A.F Lt. Col with 101 combat missions. Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from the California Institute of Technology.--"The official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It's impossible"--"I'm an old interceptor pilot, I know the drill, I've done it. I know how long it takes, I know the rules... and... critics on the government story on 9/11 have said: "Well, they knew about this, and they did nothing". That's not true. If our government had done nothing that day, and let normal procedure be followed, those planes, wherever they were, would have been intercepted, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive."—Bowman on Fox News on 9/11 conspiracy theorist being allowed to teach –“He should be allowed to teach because his conspiracy theory is much more believable than yours.”—“The most wild of these conspiracy theories is the one that our government has told us.”—

- Ted Gunderson, retired Special FBI Agent in Charge of Memphis, Dallas, and Los Angeles Divisions –“Did these terrorist attacks occur in order to take away our civil liberties and Constitutional rights, in an effort to more effectively control the population, looking toward the takeover of our country and world? I believe so.”—

- Aaron Russo, filmmaker, Tony Award winner, ran for Governor of Nevada, Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate, Advisory Board of Jews for Ron Paul –“He’s (Nick Rockefeller) the one that told me eleven months before 9/11 ever happened that there was going to be an event, never told me what the even was going to be, but there was going to be an event, and out of that event we were going to invade Afghanistan, to run pipelines through the Caspian Sea, we were going to invade Iraq, you know to take over the oil fields and establish a base in the Middle East, and make it all part of the New World Order, and we would go after Chavez in Venezuela, and sure enough later, 9/11 happened.”—“Why do you think 9/11 happened and nothing has happened since then? Do you think that our security is so great that these people who pulled off 9/11 weren’t able to knock down another plane? I mean come on that’s ridiculous, 9/11 was pulled off by people in our own government.”—“This whole ‘War on Terror’ is a fraud, it’s a farce.”—

- L

--“The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.”—Felix Frankfurter, Supreme Court Justice



Conclusion

““What we now call the “War on Terror”. It is not perfect, but it’s pretty good. It need not be stated to an educated audience that the “War on Terror” is not, in fact, a war against terrorism, something which the US still quite openly supports; nor against terror to fight an abstract noun is something that not even the Bush administration would take seriously; but it is a large lattice of policies, aimed at developing and entrenching US hegemony for the decades to come through aggressive military means. The War on Terror is not the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; those wars are but a small part of the spectrum. Much larger, and more important changes are being pursued under its aegis the militarization of space, the use of cyberspace as a defense tool, enormous increases in military budgets and personnel, renewal of material, transformation of the DoD, repositioning of global forces to protect strategic interests, securing of such interests… I could go on. But I need not - anyone who has seem the news will be familiar with the processes that are happening right now, because they are, to a great degree, what was called for by the government. Except now, they are being pursued, not under the banner of “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, but rather the War on Terror. In short, these 2 are essentially the same thing.””

Well for this to happen there would have to be thousands of people involved, thousands that knew the truth…..right? The answer is no. People are fed bits and pieces, counter-arguments, red herrings, speculations, and false information. In reality very few people would ever have to know the whole truth, and we American citizens would like to know that whole truth.

Who ends up paying for these wars, the spying, and the payrolls? You do, as your children will do. When President Bush entered office he inherited a 284 Billion dollar surplus. His administration is now responsible for four out of the top five deficits in history. The fifth? His father. As of November 2nd, 2005 the Bush administration had borrowed more from foreign nations than every single other presidency combined, 1.05 trillion dollars. We are now 10.25 trillion dollars in debt and it shows no signs of slowing. Ask yourself, what is happening? Where are we headed?

Would we be here if not for 9/11?

This is merely a small sliver of the evidence, in no way complete. There is so much more out there than in this paper, this is just the tip of the iceberg. If you care, you must delve further into this matter.

I encourage the reader to look at these facts, the debunkers, and the counter arguments to come to his or her own conclusion.

Dedicated to Aaron Russo the Freedom Fighter.
To the 2,974 lives lost in the collisions.
To the hundreds of brave fire and rescue workers who lost their lives.
To the families that were hurt.
For the memory, and the sake, of the innocent people.
And to the endless more dying because of this as we speak.

--“The important thing is to never stop questioning.”—Albert Einstein

But don’t take my word for it.

Movies:
If you would like to do further inquiry into this here are some movies I recommend.
Loose Change: 2nd Edition – engineering and science
Loose Change: Final Cut – political and circumstantial
9/11: Press For Truth –families of the victims
9/11: Road to Tyranny
9/11 Mysteries
Fahrenheit 9/11
America: Freedom to Fascism
Zeitgeist

Websites:
www.911scholars.org – scholars for 9/11 truth
www.ae911truth.org – architects and engineers for 9/11 truth
www.team8plus.org – amazing facts on the terrorists.
www.911hardfacts.com – excellent site, most comprehensive.
www.pilotsfor911truth.org – as the name implies, pilots for 911 truth
www.patriotsquestion911.com – military, gov. officials, conservatives, hundreds, more question 9/11
www.firefightersfor911truth.org – Fire fighters for 9/11 truth
www.musiciansfor911truth.org – musicians for 9/11 truth
www.stj911.org – Scholars for 9/11 truth and justice
www.ts911truth.org – Take a stand!
www.journalof911studies.com
www.wtc7.net
www.investigate911.com
www.911truth.org
www.whatreallyhappened.com
www.truthaction.org
www.911truth.com
www.911eyewitness.com
www.911weknow.com
www.911sharethetruth.com
www.911truthradio.com
www.911truthsquads.org
www.v911t.org
www.truthmove.org
www.911movement.org
www.911truthseekers.org
www.911truth.eu – Europeans for 9/11 truth
www.philly911truth.org – Pennsylvania
www.cincinatti911truth.org – Ohio 911 truth
www.columbus911truth.org – same as above
www.nc911truth.org – North Carolina
www.911truthseattle.org – Washington for 9/11 truth
www.sf911truth.org – Northern California
www.ny911truth.org – New Yorkers
www.vt911.org – Vermont
www.atlanta911.org – Georgia
www.mn911truth.org - Minnesota
www.dc911truth.org – Washington D.C. for 9/11 truth
www.boston911truth.org – Boston for 9/11 truth
www.annarbor911truth.com – Ann Arbor
www.vic911truth.org – OMG even the Canadians have their own organization
www.vancouver911truth.org – again Canadians
www.ottowa911truth.com – Canadians
www.mtl911truth.org – Canadians!
(only a smidgen of the web-sites)

Debunkers:
If you would like to look at the debunkers here are some very well put together sites.
(I would like to point out though that these sites use the ‘straw man’ argument, that is choosing the weakest, most controversial and multi-faceted claims and ‘hammering away at them like they were the only salient points in the 9/11 truth movement’. You must think very hard when examining these arguments, or rather don’t be fooled by their ‘matter-of-fact, ‘you’re a un-patriotic lunatic’ voice)
www.debunking911.com
www.popularmechanics.com
www.debunking911myths.com
www.jod911.com




--"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."-- Arthur Schopenhauer

where are all your foot-notes or in text citations?

yea haven't done the bibliography yet.....But the paper isn't for a class I'm just giving it to people who want to read it, and I must say I have a fair number convinced.

yea haven't done the bibliography yet.....But the paper isn't for a class I'm just giving it to people who want to read it, and I must say I have a fair number convinced.

yea...so did loose change :rolleyes:

yea...so did loose change :rolleyes:

mm hmm truth does that sometimes. I've looked at it from all of the angles believe me, popular mechanics, scientific american, ect.... But they can't even explain the engineering away, much less the circumstantial and political evidence. From examining the evidence this is just the conclusion that I've arrived at.

mm hmm truth does that sometimes. I've looked at it from all of the angles believe me, popular mechanics, scientific american, ect.... But they can't even explain the engineering away, much less the circumstantial and political evidence. From examining the evidence this is just the conclusion that I've arrived at.

if that's what you believe fine, just don't criticize me when I reach the opposite