fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae an itnerseting mnid too! Cna yuo
raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can. i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod
aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the
hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't
mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng
is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can
be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is
bcuseae the huamnmnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod
as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
ipmorantt!





just wondering if everyone can do this

I don't want to close this yet because the findings of that study are very interesting. Add to your post something pertaining to the thing you pasted. Maybe facts about linguistics or some insight, along with a description of what it is and how it ties into language study. For example: I find that it's one of the justifications for Chinese characters. fluent readers just see a "picture" of a word, and it's so automatic that even with an illogical spelling system like in english you just "know" what to read, no need to concentrate on sounding it out.


We don't like copypasta here.

I actually can read it, but for the 45 people that can't please describe it.

fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae an itnerseting mnid too! Cna yuo
raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can. i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod
aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the
hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't
mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng
is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can
be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is
bcuseae the huamnmnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod
as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
ipmorantt!





just wondering if everyone can do this

i found i could read this better than English or you know what i mean lol.
:confused::D

Fucking twat.

This shit is old

I actually can read it, but for the 45 people that can't please describe it.

I thought everyone could read that.

Most likely, the only people who would have a hard time reading this are those who aren't very literate and rely more on phonetic interpretations. The thing I've wondered about this thing is if it really comes from a legitimate study. It probably does but I'd actually like to see it.

Most likely, the only people who would have a hard time reading this are those who aren't very literate and rely more on phonetic interpretations. The thing I've wondered about this thing is if it really comes from a legitimate study. It probably does but I'd actually like to see it.

This.

Yeh i can read it :)

Expand on it/post the link to the paper

those who aren't very literate

personally I would add "flexible". because not being able to read some fucked up text as fast as others doesn´t mean you can´t read. it´s like with kids that can add 4+5 but don´t understand "4 apples + 5 peas is how many fruits" ..

I'm pretty sure nearly everyone can read that, except for the illiterate and the people who are just plain retarded. I know this isn't IFIOTW, but this is just SO OLD!

i can read it too :D

yep I can read it.

personally I would add "flexible". because not being able to read some fucked up text as fast as others doesn´t mean you can´t read. it´s like with kids that can add 4+5 but don´t understand "4 apples + 5 peas is how many fruits" ..

yea i can read it. also peas are vegetables dumbass

yea i can read it. also peas are vegetables dumbass

It wasn't supposed to make sense, dumbass. Anyways OP didn't elaborate and no good discussion came of this.