ArgonPlasma2000
2008-12-05, 08:20
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-saturn4-2008dec04,0,2209720.story
I've never known anything but greatness from Saturn, especially when they kept their R&D in-house. Dent-resistant panels, steel space frame affording excellent safety, very durable and fuel-efficient engines. (The S* cars) My dad's SL2's odometer broke getting close to a decade ago at 160k miles and it's still on the road getting near 30 mpg. I would bet it's got close to 300k on it. No bad oil consumption issues to speak of. Everything is mechanically sound and the transmission is in great condition.
These day's I love the Sky to death. Even the Astra and VUE are great cars for a niche market. Pontiac and Chevy have long been fierce competitors until the last 20 years where Pontiac and Chevy lost their uniqueness. There is little use in keeping them a separate division. If anything, Pontiac needs to go instead of Saturn. The entire point of competing divisions were to improve upon each other's designs. Take a look at the offerings of the various divisions, and there is little difference between some cars of different divisions. No radical cosmetic changes to speak of.
It's a damn shame they don't innovate much at all. When was the last time we had some serious performance cars with a turbocharger? (Excluding the Solstice/Sky, which are Opel's design.) The last one I can think of were the Buick GNX and the Chevrolet Syclone and GMC Typhoon. The previous car was the Sunbird with, surprise surprise, an Opel 1.8 and 2.0.
GM suffers from Reaganomics. Cut the costs and watch the profits roll in... my ass... Why make good interiors? Good interiors cost money! Why make engines that can get great fuel economy with a turbo? Fuck that shit, R&D costs money, too! And don't even bring up designing manual transmissions! :rolleyes:
One thing, just one thing I'd like to see before I die. I want a completely modular vehicle. One space frame, and you can order it with a variety of engine options based on a single platform (LS* and Ecotecs, hell, maybe even Duratecs? please? in varying number of cylinders) with manual and automatic transmissions. Another space frame and you could get that in RWD. (The Ecotecs both in RWD and FWD have the same tranny bolt patterns) Another space frame and you can get it in a Ute. The space frames come with several plastic body panel options.
This makes WAY more sense than throwing money at designing a new chassis for some other car you will only use for a few years. GM seems to be shifting towards a more modular car with it's Greek platform designations, but it's far from me being able to pick and choose my options. Software engineering has used code reuse techniques and object oriented code (modular code) for decades in order to cut costs and gain much reliablility. There is no reason that automotive manufacturers need to keep with monolithic designs that build little on the next iteration.
I've never known anything but greatness from Saturn, especially when they kept their R&D in-house. Dent-resistant panels, steel space frame affording excellent safety, very durable and fuel-efficient engines. (The S* cars) My dad's SL2's odometer broke getting close to a decade ago at 160k miles and it's still on the road getting near 30 mpg. I would bet it's got close to 300k on it. No bad oil consumption issues to speak of. Everything is mechanically sound and the transmission is in great condition.
These day's I love the Sky to death. Even the Astra and VUE are great cars for a niche market. Pontiac and Chevy have long been fierce competitors until the last 20 years where Pontiac and Chevy lost their uniqueness. There is little use in keeping them a separate division. If anything, Pontiac needs to go instead of Saturn. The entire point of competing divisions were to improve upon each other's designs. Take a look at the offerings of the various divisions, and there is little difference between some cars of different divisions. No radical cosmetic changes to speak of.
It's a damn shame they don't innovate much at all. When was the last time we had some serious performance cars with a turbocharger? (Excluding the Solstice/Sky, which are Opel's design.) The last one I can think of were the Buick GNX and the Chevrolet Syclone and GMC Typhoon. The previous car was the Sunbird with, surprise surprise, an Opel 1.8 and 2.0.
GM suffers from Reaganomics. Cut the costs and watch the profits roll in... my ass... Why make good interiors? Good interiors cost money! Why make engines that can get great fuel economy with a turbo? Fuck that shit, R&D costs money, too! And don't even bring up designing manual transmissions! :rolleyes:
One thing, just one thing I'd like to see before I die. I want a completely modular vehicle. One space frame, and you can order it with a variety of engine options based on a single platform (LS* and Ecotecs, hell, maybe even Duratecs? please? in varying number of cylinders) with manual and automatic transmissions. Another space frame and you could get that in RWD. (The Ecotecs both in RWD and FWD have the same tranny bolt patterns) Another space frame and you can get it in a Ute. The space frames come with several plastic body panel options.
This makes WAY more sense than throwing money at designing a new chassis for some other car you will only use for a few years. GM seems to be shifting towards a more modular car with it's Greek platform designations, but it's far from me being able to pick and choose my options. Software engineering has used code reuse techniques and object oriented code (modular code) for decades in order to cut costs and gain much reliablility. There is no reason that automotive manufacturers need to keep with monolithic designs that build little on the next iteration.