View Full Version : Is Hiv virus real??
I have seen a lot of Conspiracies on Aids and Hiv.. they all are appealing but not confirming.
Was it invented to prevent mankind from mass population ?? i have seen a video where in they discussed that nobody has ever seen the exact shape and size of HIV Virus..
if it is so for the good cause of preventing mass population then i think it is good to live in Fear..
Yggdrasil
2008-12-15, 22:55
HIV made its way to North America via a Haitian immigrant sometime in the 60's, I believe. I t made headlines when numerous gay men in the west coast started contracting it, but it was already well underway on its track to being a pandemic.
It's generally held in the scientific community that the virus was originally endemic to apes, and was passed to humans via sexual intercourse.
Random_Looney
2008-12-16, 10:41
Yes, it's real.
How exactly it became other than zoonotic is debated within the scientific community.
i was going through this video .. Congo in Africa was the place where it all started. People eating the Apes/ Monkeys and getting Infected. I think there should be something more to the story....
Yggdrasil
2008-12-17, 23:44
i was going through this video .. Congo in Africa was the place where it all started. People eating the Apes/ Monkeys and getting Infected. I think there should be something more to the story....
Why? Many of humanity's most virulent diseases are zoonotic in origin. Tuberculosis, for example, was acquired through close contact with pigs, but over time we've developed immunities. AIDS is no different. Just that it's spreading faster due to ease of travel, and high population densities.
easeoflife22
2008-12-18, 03:18
Why? Many of humanity's most virulent diseases are zoonotic in origin. Tuberculosis, for example, was acquired through close contact with pigs, but over time we've developed immunities. AIDS is no different. Just that it's spreading faster due to ease of travel, and high population densities.
Don't forget stupidity.
Yggdrasil
2008-12-18, 06:00
Don't forget stupidity.
Well, that's a given :p
GoodOlWillickers
2008-12-18, 06:26
HIV is real; it is the virus that causes the immune system disorder AIDS.
If you think it's so fake, try having sex with infected people and see if you don't get it.
L'Explorateur
2008-12-18, 11:28
If you think it's so fake, try having sex with infected people and see if you don't get it.
Which, although I agree with you, is a possibility considering that 2-3% of the world population is naturally immune.
Which, although I agree with you, is a possibility considering that 2-3% of the world population is naturally immune.
naturally immune?
Yggdrasil
2008-12-19, 01:55
naturally immune?
Yes; I think I've read somewhere that certain people have natural immunities. Don't know any links at the moment, though...
hitman legoff
2008-12-19, 04:46
Yes; I think I've read somewhere that certain people have natural immunities. Don't know any links at the moment, though...
Please find a link. That sounds absolutely ridiculous to me.
Pandoras Assassin
2008-12-20, 04:52
They put there 3==D in a <(0_0)> = AIDS
Thor_Axe
2008-12-20, 22:06
I can attest to you the fact that some are naturally immune. Just with every other virus on the planet, there are some out there that are immune. 2% seems a little high, for any immunity like that, less than 1% seems much more realistic.
In fact, Wired (though I dont know why they are covering bio-medical issues, but I trust their research) backs up that idea.
http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2005/01/66198
Also, at this current time, we cant readily identify AIDS/HIV virus's on their own. BUt we can identify the anitbodies that result when the virus is present in the body. This is why research is so hot right now, because if we can find and study the virus, we would be able to make drugs that fight it. Not cure it, but make things better anyway.
http://www.aids.org/factSheets/101-what-is-aids.html
P.S. I have never even heard of that theory. I have heard of the theory that states that AIDS was created by the US Military to get the gays out of the military.
Yggdrasil
2008-12-21, 00:50
I can attest to you the fact that some are naturally immune. Just with every other virus on the planet, there are some out there that are immune. 2% seems a little high, for any immunity like that, less than 1% seems much more realistic.
In fact, Wired (though I dont know why they are covering bio-medical issues, but I trust their research) backs up that idea.
http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2005/01/66198
Also, at this current time, we cant readily identify AIDS/HIV virus's on their own. BUt we can identify the anitbodies that result when the virus is present in the body. This is why research is so hot right now, because if we can find and study the virus, we would be able to make drugs that fight it. Not cure it, but make things better anyway.
http://www.aids.org/factSheets/101-what-is-aids.html
P.S. I have never even heard of that theory. I have heard of the theory that states that AIDS was created by the US Military to get the gays out of the military.
Have you been living under a cave the past half century? Gays haven't been allowed into the military until a couple years ago, and HIV has been around for decades. If you're going to go about making crackpot statements, back them up with evidence.
crow4523
2008-12-21, 03:46
Have you been living under a cave the past half century? Gays haven't been allowed into the military until a couple years ago, and HIV has been around for decades. If you're going to go about making crackpot statements, back them up with evidence.
Are you just at a lack of anything interesting or constructive to say? How exactly is sharing a theory that someone's heard with others constitute making a crackpot statement?
So really it's like:
You: Hey, I heard that motherfucking Tommy Hilfiger's shirts are made in Armenian child labor camps.
Me: Dude, if you're going to make crackpot statements, back them up with evidence.
Mankonaut
2008-12-22, 00:50
I think they say some tribesman contracted it via eating infected meat to preserve humanity's dignity. Nobody wants to think the human race is going to be wiped out because some lonely guy fucked a monkey.
L'Explorateur
2008-12-22, 03:06
I think they say some tribesman contracted it via eating infected meat to preserve humanity's dignity. Nobody wants to think the human race is going to be wiped out because some lonely guy fucked a monkey.
or that the government administered it, after countless hours of research at ft. detrick, in an experimental hepatitis-b drug to over 2000 gays in new york city.
IdentityCrisis
2008-12-22, 10:43
naturally immune?
Yeah I've read of this. It had something to do with having ancestors that survived the bubonic plague.
Also on a conspiracy aspect, it should be worthy that Henry Kissinger said that there was an issue with the population of Africa. A few months (or years, either way it was shortly after) later AIDS showed up all over Africa.
Mankonaut
2008-12-22, 13:29
And one time I said America was a shitty country...
...
... ... on the 10th of September 2001!!!!!!
anon99989
2008-12-23, 03:17
Yes; I think I've read somewhere that certain people have natural immunities. Don't know any links at the moment, though...
http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2005/01/66198
Here's one.
Also, some can contract the virus and yet show no ill effects from it. A small group of people have lived for decades without ever taking medications.
the bohemian owls
2008-12-24, 01:11
It is very real. I wish young people wouldn't buy into this bullshit that it doesn't exist. If you're one of these people telling younger people this, it's almost as if you're putting a gun to their head. I remember it hitting LA and San Francisco around 1981 or so. They called it the Gay Cancer. Then around 82 or 83 a straight person contracted it through straight sex. After that it became a pandemic. scaring the crap out of everyone I knew up until the 1990s when the younger Generation had finally grown into adulthood and they seemed to be apathetic about the disease. There was a man from Kenya or the Congo who died in 1957 and was dug up in the 1990s who's corpse tested positive for the HIV virus. Sorry if someone already pointed this out but I didn't want to read every post since I came into this conversation a bit late.
the bohemian owls
2008-12-24, 01:14
http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2005/01/66198
Here's one.
Also, some can contract the virus and yet show no ill effects from it. A small group of people have lived for decades without ever taking medications.
I read it is as many as 1 in 10 people wont be affected by the virus and if those 10% never took an HIV test they would never have known they have it.
I also wanted to point out that a friend of mine had a cousin who died from it. He was a drug user but I dont think he was into needles or heroin. I think he contracted it through sexual intercourse with a girl who also tested positive. The girl had slept with several other guys and they too contracted it. So it is really messed up to say it doesn't exist. What we should be fearing is when it mutates by breeding with the common flu virus and become air born.
moby_dick
2008-12-24, 01:38
Yes.
©
I think they say some tribesman contracted it via eating infected meat to preserve humanity's dignity. Nobody wants to think the human race is going to be wiped out because some lonely guy fucked a monkey.
:)) That's a good pick up line.
ArmsMerchant
2008-12-26, 19:17
Living in fear is not a good idea.
Fear is your only enemy.
Nobody wants to think the human race is going to be wiped out because some lonely guy fucked a monkey.
Made me lol
HairyFreak
2008-12-30, 00:41
It is very real. I wish young people wouldn't buy into this bullshit that it doesn't exist. If you're one of these people telling younger people this, it's almost as if you're putting a gun to their head. I remember it hitting LA and San Francisco around 1981 or so. They called it the Gay Cancer. Then around 82 or 83 a straight person contracted it through straight sex. After that it became a pandemic. scaring the crap out of everyone I knew up until the 1990s when the younger Generation had finally grown into adulthood and they seemed to be apathetic about the disease. There was a man from Kenya or the Congo who died in 1957 and was dug up in the 1990s who's corpse tested positive for the HIV virus. Sorry if someone already pointed this out but I didn't want to read every post since I came into this conversation a bit late.
necrophiliac explains this.
Runaway_Stapler
2008-12-30, 01:06
Have you been living under a cave the past half century?
The expression is "under a rock" or possibly "in a cave," but never "under a cave."
Gays haven't been allowed into the military until a couple years ago, and HIV has been around for decades.
Exactly. Wasn't the problem that the military had gays in it that weren't parading their orientation around? So the theory goes that HIV was concocted in a lab as a way to eliminate them [because it would spread through the gay population quite readily and weed them out, and straight soldiers obviously weren't going to contract it]. Gays were already there, they wanted them out. Yeah?
If you're going to go about making crackpot statements, back them up with evidence.
Solid advice.
I think they say some tribesman contracted it via eating infected meat to preserve humanity's dignity. Nobody wants to think the human race is going to be wiped out because some lonely guy fucked a monkey.
Why the hell do people cling to the idea that simian HIV was transfered by a guy fucking a monkey? I think it has something to do with the way rumors spread and how outlandish things are so attention grabbing, like that whole trainwreck expression.
If you weigh out the evidence that a guy fucked a monkey vs. a guy ate infected meat, or even that there was blood to blood contact, it's quite obvious that no monkey fucking occurred.
When a virus transcends species, however closely related, it has to do a little evolving to get good at infecting the new species, because the DNA isn't the same as the other specie. As you know from bio, evolution is kind of a hit or miss crapshoot, and it would take a lot of exposure of the virus for one of the viruses to have the exact mutation that lets it infect people. If you take into consideration that a lot of africans eat monkeys because food isn't so bountiful, and that butchers cut their hands, it's easy to see that the exposure blood/blood from eating monkeys is going to be far greater than the exposure from the lonely guy fucking a monkey. Not to mention, if the guy was lonely enough to fuck a monkey, he's probably not sexually active enough to make it a problem for the general population.
HIV is real; it is the virus that causes the immune system disorder AIDS.
If you think it's so fake, try having sex with infected people and see if you don't get it.
Other things cause AIDS Dipshit.
Aces High
2008-12-30, 01:21
Other things cause AIDS Dipshit.
No, that is fucking wrong.
Only one thing causes AIDS, and that's HIV.
..Dipshit.
skyclaw441
2008-12-30, 01:28
Yes. I find myself partial to the conspiracy theory that the U.S. created it for bioweapon usage in the cold war in 1969, by genetically altering an immunodeficiency virus common in animals by adding a sequence of 300 genomes to make it undetectable by the human immune system. They then gave it to prisoners. The promise of facilities at the time with bioweapon testing was that if you survived, you were set free. So, they gave it to prisoners, and they showed the typical symptoms one gets when they first contract the infection, then they recovered, as do all people who get it. With prison rape cases stereotypically commonplace, it's pretty obvious that one of these prisoners was gay. They then started having sex with other men, then some spread it to women through bi-sexual contact. It may have been in Africa, it may not have been. Symptoms of the later stages of the disease appeared in 1979 in California, and then...
The thing that really does it in for me is that it Africans have been eating diets of indigenous animals, including apes, for thousands of years. If it indeed came from animals, how come they contracted it *only* in the 1970's, and not thousands of years earlier?
A local paper here in Arizona says the virus is most closely traced back to chimpanzees who as monkeys, are immune to it. How it got to humans I don't know, nor did they say I don't think.
smokemon
2008-12-30, 02:11
Isn't the rule for retroviruses all about replication?
If it hasn't been put in a little dish and duped in a lab, how the fuck do we really know what we're dealing with other than some lame, generic seeming "immune system gives up cause guy does things that make it angry over and over again?"
Can someone at least explain why it's just "TEH AIDZ" but the diseases contracted in the immune-defficient state seem to correspond with the patient's previous actions?
It seems like IV drug users and gays go down two different paths of demise. How would one virus result in two fairly different sets of progressive illnesses? How can having a needle in your arm or a dick in your butt years back influence the course of illness sets you get form immune deficiency?
Fuck I don't know, don't listen to me.
*burnin' down hot topic plays*
enjoyur1life
2008-12-30, 03:04
idk, but i read on The Unhived Mind (truth forum) that it's a group of a bunch of diseases that can be individually treated, and if you have a couple of those diseases, you test positive.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/The_Unhived_Mind_II/index.php?showforum=11
beergoggles
2009-01-14, 00:38
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCR5-%CE%9432#CCR5-.CE.9432
For those of you curious about a portion of the population being immune.
Slave of the Beast
2009-01-14, 09:34
A local paper here in Arizona says the virus is most closely traced back to chimpanzees who as monkeys, are immune to it. How it got to humans I don't know, nor did they say I don't think.
Chimpanzees aren't immune to SIV, they just don't live long enough for it to become a problem:
"One of the mismatches between the disease and its human host that most affects disease virulence is that the immune system after HIV infection of the human being deteriorates in 5 to 15 years; this same period would be unimportant to non-human primate populations in the wild because they have shorter mean life-spans and maturation periods and may generally die of other causes before they lose their effective immune system."
Arthur, K.L. Stone age diseases and modern AIDS. Virology Journal. 2008; 5: 93.
And it's just as well they didn't say how it transferred to humans, because they'd probably have been talking more shit.
Bubba Ho Tep 420
2009-01-15, 01:04
or that the government administered it, after countless hours of research at ft. Detrick, in an experimental hepatitis-b drug to over 2000 gays in new york city.
the government
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCR5-%CE%9432#CCR5-.CE.9432
For those of you curious about a portion of the population being immune.
very interesting and informative
+1
droppinds
2009-01-16, 02:15
Sayin the HIV virus isn't real is completly wrong no matter how you spin it. I think the conspiracy theory you might be confusing it with is the one where the HIV virus is actually harmless.
HIV is a retrovirus, they are very weak and simple and do not cause anything like the havoc seen with what people say about HIV/AIDS. Ive heard that the reason people can live with it for so long is that it is harmless and it is actually the drugs they give you that attack your immune system that make you sick. And supposdly the fact that we cant really find it is cuz its a harmless retrovirus that passed through are system like what happens when you get a cold or the sniffles, then its gone. But the antibodies remain for the rest of your life. We dont go around saying ppl have chicken pox because we have the antibodies against it, the antibodies remain for the rest of your life when you fend off a virus. And when you walk in a hospital and lets say you have Kaposis Sarcoms, normally they treat you for Kaposi's sarcoma obviously. If you go into a hospital and you ahve Kaposi's Sarcoma, AND you test positive for the HIV virus then you have AIDS and they put you on a cocktail fo drugs that attack your immune system. supposdly this all done for the benefit of the pharmaeutcetical industry.
I dont believe this im just throwin the theory out there
EDIT: And contrary to popular belief AIDS was actually in America before Africa. This has been proven by testing old blood samples from all over Africa. Theres virtually 0 cases in hte 50's 60's and 70's in Africa. And it started in 1979 in America. It wasn't in Africa until a buncha ppl got it vaccinated for Small pox in the 80's. Then it magically sprung up.
And contrary to popular belief AIDS was actually in America before Africa. This has been proven by testing old blood samples from all over Africa. Theres virtually 0 cases in hte 50's 60's and 70's in Africa. And it started in 1979 in America. It wasn't in Africa until a buncha ppl got it vaccinated for Small pox in the 80's. Then it magically sprung up.
source?