ZeroMalarki
2008-12-17, 14:09
Today on Zero's Pet Hate of the Day, we discuss MySpace/Facebook/bebo photos.
For a start, we are so used to seeing them photoshopped, altered, made more attractive. That's nice and all, but we can usually work out when this is the case.
What really doesn't make sense to me are those people who don't. Those guys who post "hot", or "sexy" under a girl's photo.
This applies to those pictures un-shopped as well. Seriously, do you expect into a girl by complimenting them with one word answers?
Even the simplest of womanizers can work out this isn't the case. Simple PUA logic will point out you are paying the girl attention who 9/10 has enough attention on her hands. Meaning that unless you know the girl, you come off as a passing creepy wierdo. If you do know the girl, you're probably going to further yourself into the "Lets Just Be Friend's Zones".
So moral of this pet hate, is don't post "hot" or "cute" under a girl's photo. Just fap to it instead.
For a start, we are so used to seeing them photoshopped, altered, made more attractive. That's nice and all, but we can usually work out when this is the case.
What really doesn't make sense to me are those people who don't. Those guys who post "hot", or "sexy" under a girl's photo.
This applies to those pictures un-shopped as well. Seriously, do you expect into a girl by complimenting them with one word answers?
Even the simplest of womanizers can work out this isn't the case. Simple PUA logic will point out you are paying the girl attention who 9/10 has enough attention on her hands. Meaning that unless you know the girl, you come off as a passing creepy wierdo. If you do know the girl, you're probably going to further yourself into the "Lets Just Be Friend's Zones".
So moral of this pet hate, is don't post "hot" or "cute" under a girl's photo. Just fap to it instead.