It is of vital importance that you all take a moment and hear the message being delivered in this video, along with its points. For those who enjoy good aesthetics, this video is available to be watched in realtime HD by clicking "watch in HD" under the player.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjRpTzKt3Y

This also looks great full screen.

Please be sure to comment, no matter your disposition. In addition, I'd immensely appreciate it if you'd rate the video, along with sharing it and subscribing to the Channel if it is of your liking. This is but the first of many reports and insights to come. Ranging from political content to mental exercises.

I'll admit, this is shameless promotion as there is no shame to feel. It is not promotion of myself, but of thoughts and knowledge on existing issues.

I thank you all who give your eyes and ears to this video and do hope to hear from you all soon.

Sincerely somebody,
Not any better than you.

P.S.
Did some serious browsing around this forum and I think I am going like it a lot here. I feel very at home already.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2433

Very well produced video, and you make some great comments about a bill that would effect us all. I personally stand against this, and I enjoyed the way you presented it. I look forward to seeing more from you, and I am glad someone is taking their time to educate the people.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2433

Yes, that would be referring to the bill that is addressed in the video. The video taps onto it's current standing in being passed, along with the cons of this bill and the agenda it appears to serve in the long run.

Very well produced video, and you make some great comments about a bill that would effect us all. I personally stand against this, and I enjoyed the way you presented it. I look forward to seeing more from you, and I am glad someone is taking their time to educate the people.

Thank you very much; I sincerely appreciate the kind words. I hope you take whatever measures you, as a citizen can by contacting your representative, local news network, or a facet of the mainstream media stressing your position on what this unrighteous bill.

Yes, that would be referring to the bill that is addressed in the video. The video taps onto it's current standing in being passed, along with the cons of this bill and the agenda it appears to serve in the long run.

I read the thing and I didn't see where it said that it would ban guns...

I read the thing and I didn't see where it said that it would ban guns...

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2433/text

Did you check here? This was linked in the video description and is more concise than the link you posted. The ban on light weapons that would technically repeal our 2nd Amendment rights falls under one of the mandates of the UN we'd be obligated to follow and no, its not the only one either

Even as a Pacifist, this displeases me in ways that are hard to describe without breaking into obscenities.

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s2433/text

Did you check here? This was linked in the video description and is more concise than the link you posted. The ban on light weapons that would technically repeal our 2nd Amendment rights falls under one of the mandates of the UN we'd be obligated to follow and no, its not the only one either

Even as a Pacifist, this displeases me in ways that are hard to describe without breaking into obscenities.

That is where I read it. Specifically, which of these mandates would eliminate gun ownership?

That is where I read it. Specifically, which of these mandates would eliminate gun ownership?
"UN Global Poverty Act requires US to pay 845 billion to the UN and adhere to UN treaties including banning all small arms. Also Sets up international courts that supersede our courts."

That's where it specifically says such.

I still suggest that everyone takes a look at the points that're made in the video and follows the actions suggested by it as well if they too, are as outraged by this sort of legislation being even considered.

I wonder if this is the "change" Obama voters had envisioned.

The video was creepy but I liked it. They aren't going to take any guns. They don't have the balls. I mean really, who the fuck is going to take them? The UN? The cops? Glassification is the only way Americans are going to be disarmed. I would be only one of many gun wielding nutcases shooting the very people dumb enough to try and take them.

Edit: The threat isn't in the text of this bill. It's hidden within the text of other bills we have to pass in accordance to this one. They hope everyone is going to look at this and say, "oh its just another bill to fight poverty."

The video was creepy but I liked it. They aren't going to take any guns. They don't have the balls. I mean really, who the fuck is going to take them? The UN? The cops? Glassification is the only way Americans are going to be disarmed. I would be only one of many gun wielding nutcases shooting the very people dumb enough to try and take them.
Heh, I know my presentation is not exactly of the brightest sort, but I feel it is fitting as the subject matter is just as dark. I am glad you liked it nonetheless; feel free to subscribe and interact through the host site (YouTube) in any manner that you wish. It can only help the video go viral.

I will be releasing a lot in the next month and probably a heavy load more after January 20th is done and over with.

As I have stated before, I am a Pacifist of practice for a little over a decade now, but do firmly stand behind our right to bear arms. Gun control is a practice of dictatorship -- one that Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Kim Jong-Il, Qaddafi, Idi Amin, Pol Pot and Mao Tse-tung have implemented with success. There military and police force does not rival the numbers of our own and if we truly see America become a police state ruled under martial law, then I think your "nutcase" methodology may be your only hope in holding onto that firearm for a bit longer, sadly.

I seriously hope people take the actions and measure I have with this bill and have voiced their stance with great emphasis on the injustice that is spelled out in the body of the bill.

"UN Global Poverty Act requires US to pay 845 billion to the UN and adhere to UN treaties including banning all small arms. Also Sets up international courts that supersede our courts."

That's where it specifically says such.

I still suggest that everyone takes a look at the points that're made in the video and follows the actions suggested by it as well if they too, are as outraged by this sort of legislation being even considered.

I wonder if this is the "change" Obama voters had envisioned.

That is not in the text.

I like fightinig for freedom and all, but you don't do it with mistruths.

That is not in the text.

I like fightinig for freedom and all, but you don't do it with mistruths.
I do apologize, that was taken from a different source; this is actually what the text I meant to paste that is relevant to that exact text:

“To take concerted action to end illicit traffic in small arms and light weapons, especially by making arms transfers more transparent and supporting regional disarmament measures”

I would appreciate it if you wouldn't be so quick as to claim something a mistruth. It is, afterall, human to make mistakes.

The quote I originally gave you came from a firearms forum (http://www.uzitalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39634) I frequent where I originally first text on it before researching it further. I have noticed some blogs are whitewashing the S.2433 but that is no surprise as a majority prefer not to read between the lines.

Do you honestly think Obama does not have globalizing intention with him campaigning in Berlin in July of this year giving a speech that opened with remarks about the passage that came when the wall fell and closing it with a remark about bringing the walls down between nations? In addition, are you implying that Obama doesn't have a problem with firearms?

That is not in the text.

I like fightinig for freedom and all, but you don't do it with mistruths.

Actually read the bill and the other acts and treaties it requires. Or go to http://www.dailypaul.com/node/38069 if you want it spoon fed to you.

Edit: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm and hit Ctrl+F and type in the word 'arms' and you will see what we're talking about.

Actually read the bill and the other acts and treaties it requires. Or go to http://www.dailypaul.com/node/38069 if you want it spoon fed to you.

Edit: http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm and hit Ctrl+F and type in the word 'arms' and you will see what we're talking about.

Thanks redjoker, I am in the middle of writing another transcript so I had but to reference whatever tabs I still have open.

Do you honestly think Obama does not have globalizing intention with him campaigning in Berlin in July of this year giving a speech that opened with remarks about the passage that came when the wall fell and closing it with a remark about bringing the walls down between nations? In addition, are you implying that Obama doesn't have a problem with firearms?

I don't know what his intentions are, but "bringing down walls" doesn't quite mean "taking away our guns". Obama has said it many times that he believes in the 2nd amendment right to own and operate firearms. I'm much more fearful of the Democratic-controlled Congress than I am of Obama.

As for your link to uzitalk, it doesn't load for me.

In any case, reading the proposed legislation you have a problem with it references two other things:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Development_Goals#Goals
http://www.state.gov/e/eeb/rls/othr/19458.htm

Neither of which have any proposition of banning firearms. There is no reference to the Millennium Declaration.

I don't know what his intentions are, but "bringing down walls" doesn't quite mean "taking away our guns". Obama has said it many times that he believes in the 2nd amendment right to own and operate firearms. I'm much more fearful of the Democratic-controlled Congress than I am of Obama.

As for your link to uzitalk, it doesn't load for me.

In any case, reading the proposed legislation you have a problem with it references two other things:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Development_Goals#Goals
http://www.state.gov/e/eeb/rls/othr/19458.htm

Neither of which have any proposition of banning firearms. There is no reference to the Millennium Declaration.
The walls reference was definitely towards my globalization point and I do suggest you look into redjoker's directions if you are having any further problems seeing what should be right in front of you. I honestly think you're making it harder than it really is.

Here's the UziTalk link: http://www.uzitalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39634

http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Development_Goals#Goals

They aren't going to take any guns. They don't have the balls. I mean really, who the fuck is going to take them? The UN? The cops? Glassification is the only way Americans are going to be disarmed. I would be only one of many gun wielding nutcases shooting the very people dumb enough to try and take them.


they dont have the balls??? are u serious? were talking about out GOVERNMENT. the same govt who imprisons people they dont like, the same govt who sucks the americans people money to the pocket of private bankers. believe me, they have more than enough balls to do this. what do u think they have been trying to do the last few years? new york, chicago, d.c.? blanket gun ban (well, d.c. has been repealed) but nonetheless, if they wanted to, they could do anything they wanted and the normal joe couldnt do shit about it.

they dont have the balls??? are u serious? were talking about out GOVERNMENT. the same govt who imprisons people they dont like, the same govt who sucks the americans people money to the pocket of private bankers. believe me, they have more than enough balls to do this. what do u think they have been trying to do the last few years? new york, chicago, d.c.? blanket gun ban (well, d.c. has been repealed) but nonetheless, if they wanted to, they could do anything they wanted and the normal joe couldnt do shit about it.

Are they going to fight and imprison well over a third of our nation? Even if 10% were to fight they couldn't do it. I'm sure the bandwagon effect will take place and stick those number up much higher though. Our government is only good at picking off the weak and defenseless and they doing their best to try and take the moral high ground. In this case they won't be picking off weaker and smaller groups. They won't have the moral high ground either. They've been losing that shit for a while now.

The walls reference was definitely towards my globalization point and I do suggest you look into redjoker's directions if you are having any further problems seeing what should be right in front of you. I honestly think you're making it harder than it really is.

Here's the UziTalk link: http://www.uzitalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39634

Look, I don't mean to be a dick about this and I like people taking an active stance to inform people, but please forgive me if I do not believe something that looks and smells like bullshit. It might well not be, but I have thus far seen only the word "Millenium" connecting the S.2433 and the UN Millennium Declaration.

I'll make myself clear: the Millennium Development Goals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Development_Goals#Goals) are a set of goals the we have already agreed to follow. None of those Goals have anything at all to do with banning the ownership of firearms nor does it have anything to do with setting up UN courts which wuld trump our own.

Furthermore, we have already adopted the Millennium Declaration (which has absolutely nothing to do with S.2433) which states the following and more:
• To ensure the implementation, by States Parties, of treaties in areas such as arms control and disarmament and of international humanitarian law and human rights law, and call upon all States to consider signing and ratifying the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

• To take concerted action to end illicit traffic in small arms and light weapons, especially by making arms transfers more transparent and supporting regional disarmament measures, taking account of all the recommendations of the forthcoming United Nations Conference on Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons.

Even further, the Rome Statute deals with crimes against humanity, genocide, war crimes, and other international crimes. Such a court has no authority over domestic crimes, unless it were to fall under one of the aforementioned jurisdictions.

Are they going to fight and imprison well over a third of our nation? Even if 10% were to fight they couldn't do it. I'm sure the bandwagon effect will take place and stick those number up much higher though. Our government is only good at picking off the weak and defenseless and they doing their best to try and take the moral high ground. In this case they won't be picking off weaker and smaller groups. They won't have the moral high ground either. They've been losing that shit for a while now.

true, but there are "conspiracies/rumors" that martial law might be put into effect. that will definitely make it a hell of a lot easier to do w/e they want.

i dont believe that martial law will be put into effect, but if they wanted to find a way to put down the people, thats the way to do it.

Don't have the balls? Yeah right, my brother in law took a trip from VA to NJ, the cops pulled him over and found his 9mm not concealed in any sort. Took his gun, put him in jail and gave him bail, his charge was possession of illegal firearms. They wanted him to serve 10+ years, but he got it dropped to 5 years probation. His probation officers laugh at him in Virginia, because the charge doesn't even exist there. He is a good hard working individual with a family, and he got that in return. Think about it.

Don't have the balls? Yeah right, my brother in law took a trip from VA to NJ, the cops pulled him over and found his 9mm not concealed in any sort. Took his gun, put him in jail and gave him bail, his charge was possession of illegal firearms. They wanted him to serve 10+ years, but he got it dropped to 5 years probation. His probation officers laugh at him in Virginia, because the charge doesn't even exist there. He is a good hard working individual with a family, and he got that in return. Think about it.

Your brother in law is a bitch.

true, but there are "conspiracies/rumors" that martial law might be put into effect. that will definitely make it a hell of a lot easier to do w/e they want.

i dont believe that martial law will be put into effect, but if they wanted to find a way to put down the people, thats the way to do it.

Enacting martial law would be suicide. That is actually the last thing they would want to do. Martial law would instantly start riots and killing. Even a curfew would be enough to start the chaos.

Yeah the government will never move against you.

There's no way they could smear large groups in the press and then take you down as an example. They certainly couldn't take your guns, there aren't any officers that would relish the opportunity to do that at all. Hell back during that hurricane the government's guys were actually ENCOURAGING people to keep their guns and certainly didn't confiscate people's weapons without giving them a receipt.

They also couldn't just slowly choke out gun owners. A big tax on ammo sure wouldn't impact people's shooting habits at all and if you hid your gun surely they wouldn't find out you still had it from anyone.

You're brother in law is a bitch.



If by "bitch" you mean a 6'2" Italian that would beat the dog shit out of you, then sure. Bad asses with keyboards are super siq, I wish I could press buttons like you.:rolleyes:

If by "bitch" you mean a 6'2" Italian that would beat the dog shit out of you, then sure. Bad asses with keyboards are super siq, I wish I could press buttons like you.:rolleyes:

Yes we know 6'2" italians can beat the shit out of anyone. Since he's a bitch I don't expect him to do shit. Nobody will ever take my gun away from while I'm still alive.

Not many people will resist if they decide to disarm the US civilian population. Not nearly enough will resist, and if they do it won't be nearly organized enough. Most people are complacent, fluoridated.

But if they declare martial law and try to take your guns and you decide to resist and fight them, remember when you're shooting them dead, that a lot of them are scumbags. Gangbanger scumbags, narcissistic womanizer scumbags, rapists, etc. Keep in mind most of them probably deserve to die. I hate to burst a lot of people's bubbles but the military is a magnet for scumbags, just like politics. They don't mind killing women and children. That's why they're in the military, they just want to get paid. And like cops, a lot of them will be bullies, on a power trip.

Kill them with extreme prejudice...

I often wonder about whether the american civilians can resist tyranny as good as the people of Iraq have been resisting the tyranny of the american government. They had a lot of help from extremists though. I just don't think americans are organized enough. I think they'll need to do a much better job than the iraqis because if they fail, the rest of the world is fucked.


Guns are not enough to resist them. A large amount of civilians should stockpile explosives, automate their explosive syntheses and organize in groups and train themselves well. Unfortunately the only groups that come close to being organized enough are racist groups, and I think they're not quite organized enough, they just don't have the capacity or the power.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."


"If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

Nobody will ever take my gun away from while I'm still alive.

amen to that man. if they ever try to impose a bullshit law like blanket gun bans, then im gonna bury my guns in the back yard. oh and im also glad im not in chi-town anymore since they have that law too.

You're brother in law is a bitch.

The correct word would be your. You see it's not you are brother in law is a bitch.

The question is: if 23-year-old Travis J. Hart of Virginia is so sure the government is out to get him that he has to wear a mask and disguise his voice, why does he make himself so easy to track down?

The question is: if 23-year-old Travis J. Hart of Virginia is so sure the government is out to get him that he has to wear a mask and disguise his voice, why does he make himself so easy to track down?
That would be my videographer; thanks for playing though.

In addition, when did I, Saiminyaku ever say that I was certain the government was tracking me down or even in fear of it? I don't think that was ever mentioned or up for debate whatsoever. I'm pretty sure I have disclosed my residency in that little area in the top-right portion of each of my posts, mate.

EDIT: Oh, and Travis goes by "Ravi." He does photography also, if you'd like to lurk further.

Not many people will resist if they decide to disarm the US civilian population. Not nearly enough will resist, and if they do it won't be nearly organized enough. Most people are complacent, fluoridated.

But if they declare martial law and try to take your guns and you decide to resist and fight them, remember when you're shooting them dead, that a lot of them are scumbags. Gangbanger scumbags, narcissistic womanizer scumbags, rapists, etc. Keep in mind most of them probably deserve to die. I hate to burst a lot of people's bubbles but the military is a magnet for scumbags, just like politics. They don't mind killing women and children. That's why they're in the military, they just want to get paid. And like cops, a lot of them will be bullies, on a power trip.

Kill them with extreme prejudice...

I often wonder about whether the american civilians can resist tyranny as good as the people of Iraq have been resisting the tyranny of the american government. They had a lot of help from extremists though. I just don't think americans are organized enough. I think they'll need to do a much better job than the iraqis because if they fail, the rest of the world is fucked.


Guns are not enough to resist them. A large amount of civilians should stockpile explosives, automate their explosive syntheses and organize in groups and train themselves well. Unfortunately the only groups that come close to being organized enough are racist groups, and I think they're not quite organized enough, they just don't have the capacity or the power.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."


"If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

Excellent quotes to promote an otherwise, violent alternative to handing over your arms to the higher circle. You make a lot of valid points and it is especially true that if an aggressive revolt is our only, then we're going to need much better artillery than domestic firearms.

With things like the:

The “United States Civil Disturbance Plan” -- P 55-2
The “Readiness Exercise Plan” -- REX 84 Alpha
The “Homeland Security Act” -- Public Law 107-296
The “National Security Presidential Directive;’ also referred to as NSPD-51 [National Continuity Policy]
The “Homeland Security Presidential Directive;” also referred to as HSPD-20 [National Continuity Policy]

I don't see how anyone could not see that measures have been taken and the government has been more than prepared for martial law since the 70s after the violence of '67-'68.

It is just a matter of when it will benefit the agenda of the higher circle, not if.

That would be my videographer; thanks for playing though.

Hey, they can find him, they can find you.

In addition, when did I, Saiminyaku ever say that I was certain the government was tracking me down or even in fear of it? I don't think that was ever mentioned or up for debate whatsoever. I'm pretty sure I have disclosed my residency in that little area in the top-right portion of each of my posts, mate.

Yeah...very brave. So why the mask and voice changer?

EDIT: Oh, and Travis goes by "Ravi." He does photography also, if you'd like to lurk further.

Stalk, you mean? Eh...already bored. TJ, Teej, fleshditch, the Japanese word for sleeping pill...whatever he calls himself...he should either tighten up the anonymity or lose it altogether.

Hey, they can find him, they can find you.

Yeah...very brave. So why the mask and voice changer?

Stalk, you mean? Eh...already bored. TJ, Teej, fleshditch, the Japanese word for sleeping pill...whatever he calls himself...he should either tighten up the anonymity or lose it altogether.

1. I personally don't care if they find me or not. However, they really have no business with him in any event.

2. The mask is of Guy Fawkes and holds symbolism. Not to mention, it was the only one of three used in the final fight scene's choreography that wasn't broken (ref. "V for Vendetta"). No, it wasn't worn by the actor, but it is still of sentimental value to me. It is irrelevant what I look like or who I am -- identity should have no influence on the idea.

The pitch change is of very mild distortion and was of Ravi's doing. I enjoyed the tonality of it when listening to it through the monitoring headphones so I went with it.

3. Did you find his MySpace or something? Your skills of observation astound me.

I don't think he is trying to be anonymous by any means; "fleshditch" is his gamer tag and T.J. are his initials. However, I'm sure your observation skills saw through that attempt at being anonymous.


It may be better next time to ask these sorts of questions first before making loose assumptions to spare you and I the time spent in the go-around.

The correct word would be your. You see it's not you are brother in law is a bitch.

Sorry grammar police I'll fix that. When the revolution happens I'm paying you a visit.

"If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

Good quote for the mood. Pretty much I see it going down like this. They pass some new bill and they fuck with the wrong guy. The guy will probably get killed. Maybe a public figure will get arrested who knows. Then groups of people waiting for this exact thing to happen start riots and the police will either quite their jobs, join the cause, or get wiped the fuck out. Ya there are a lot of cops but there aren't anywhere near the amount needed. They don't even make up 1% of the population. There are lots of soldiers but not nearly the amount that are needed to stop whats going to happen. What the fuck are they going to do about all the smaller towns and cities where there are only 2 or 3 cops per 5,000 rednecks with plenty of weapons training. They're going to fucking run for their lives because there will be dozens and dozens of armed, very dangerous, and pissed off people driving around shooting government officials and any cop they see. They might be able to hold a few cities if they push all their resources into them but it won't be enough. Their (police) best case scenario is blockading a city after seizing a sizable amount of weapons and killing lots of civilians. Over time more weapons and experienced fighters will move in to arm and train the population for the eventual cleansing.

There are a lot of reasons why we are much more dangerous to occupy than Iraq. A larger percentage of us have good weapons and know how to use them. We have 10 times as many more people. Our land and number of resources are vastly greater than theirs as well.

I honestly believe the children and young people will be the ones to win this revolution. They've grown up hating our government. They've grown up with more pressure and competition than previous generations. All we know is violence. Everyday we are spammed with violence in games, music, news, and the movies. When we see that killing all the people that really fucked our lives up the most will make us the heroes we will not hesitate. We aren't generation protest. We're generation kill.

Simple,

A foreign goverment comes here imposing sanctions and laws we hang them from the closest lightpole. Problem Solved.

It will take more than marching and protesting, Those days are over.
Most Major cities will be isolated when their infrastructure crumbles. Bridges are destroyed along with transformers and highways that are jammed. Food cant get in then mass riots ensue. We are the military and when you swear your oath, you swear too defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and "domestic". Firstly we should eliminate our corrupt leaders who arent opposed too a one world goverment. Get the fuck out or die. The American People are the true goverment we are required too excercise our authority once in a blue moon too maintain our freedom uphold our constitution.

Stockpiling.

“To take concerted action to end illicit traffic in small arms and light weapons, especially by making arms transfers more transparent and supporting regional disarmament measures”

That is quite a stretch to interpret that as banning firearms in the USA. Anyways, it doesn't matter if the bill specifically stated "firearms would be banned" because that would be unconstitutional and would require an amendment, not a bill passed by congress.

Anyways, it doesn't matter if the bill specifically stated "firearms would be banned" because that would be unconstitutional and would require an amendment, not a bill passed by congress.

just like chicago and new york and washington d.c. and maybe even seattle, right? well not d.c. anymore, but i hope u get the point.

just like chicago and new york and washington d.c. and maybe even seattle, right? well not d.c. anymore, but i hope u get the point.

I hope YOU get the point, seeing as how you are aware of what happened in DC. The courts have spoken.

Why was Los Angeles left out of this little example? I believe they recently made the .50 caliber illegal there and is stretching statewide.

1. I personally don't care if they find me or not. However, they really have no business with him in any event.

Except maybe for all of those pics of his cannabis he posts on Flickr.

2. The mask is of Guy Fawkes and holds symbolism. Not to mention, it was the only one of three used in the final fight scene's choreography that wasn't broken (ref. "V for Vendetta").

Prediction: within a year, all of the fags who post on YouTube in V for Vendetta masks will put them in storage with their Frodo wig and their Kill Bill sword; there will be a sharp rise in fags posting on YouTube wearing "Watchmen" outfits.

No, it wasn't worn by the actor, but it is still of sentimental value to me. It is irrelevant what I look like or who I am -- identity should have no influence on the idea. The pitch change is of very mild distortion and was of Ravi's doing. I enjoyed the tonality of it when listening to it through the monitoring headphones so I went with it.

Lies. You disguised your identity because you think the government is going to getcha for exposing their nefarious plans.

Your skills of observation are astounding....
However, I'm sure your observation skills saw through....

I have such a boner right now.

Except maybe for all of those pics of his cannabis he posts on Flickr.

Prediction: within a year, all of the fags who post on YouTube in V for Vendetta masks will put them in storage with their Frodo wig and their Kill Bill sword; there will be a sharp rise in fags posting on YouTube wearing "Watchmen" outfits.

Lies. You disguised your identity because you think the government is going to getcha for exposing their nefarious plans.

I have such a boner right now.
1. He shot for Weed World, I'm sure there is some legality in CA for such works of publication.

2. I am not affiliated with "Anonymous." End of discussion.

3. Believe what you will.

4. That's pleasant.

Troll along now.

All right, all right, I'm sorry.

Here's a video I made for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmRII3UwX2c

All right, all right, I'm sorry.

Here's a video I made for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmRII3UwX2c

i lol'd at that one.

heres a video i made for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

I looked over Bill S.2433 and I don't really see what the original video is talking about.
Can someone point out the parts about the Global Tax and Mandates for me please.

I looked over Bill S.2433 and I don't really see what the original video is talking about.
Can someone point out the parts about the Global Tax and Mandates for me please.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

hope this helps

I looked over Bill S.2433 and I don't really see what the original video is talking about.
Can someone point out the parts about the Global Tax and Mandates for me please.

Look over this thread with links to other sources as the original link is not the source of what most people seem to be focusing on -- the gun control issue.

P.S.
Sorry you got Rick Roll'd.