Is there a conspiracy behind circumcision? I've read that the Jews, in order to not get picked out by having been clipped by the SS, somehow made circumcision mainstream in america.

I've also read that it's a feminist thing...

I know it originated in the bible and all, but loads of things originated in the bible and are now popularly seen as bullshit -- even by christians and americans. Why does circumcision remain?

Uncircumcised dicks look like tremors (http://coobs.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/tremors-worm.jpg). They are fucking gross.

Circumcision costs money.

A lot of doctors are Jews.

Jews brainwash people into circumcision.

its allot healthier stops bacteria breeding in the folds

and cuts down on the amount of masturbating related deaths

circumcision=jews increasing autism=jew consipracy

Research information is now available that shows that the development of complex and intricate neural pathways in the brain of a baby is one of the keys to intelligence (see Chakras and Brain Research Summary and Brain). These neural pathways are the highways that the chemical transmitters follow in the brain as it searches for information on a specific subject to return back to the main memory section of the brain for processing. The more complex and intricate these neural pathways, the easier and faster it is for a brain to process information.

Conversely, it has also been discovered that pain and traumatic stress experienced by a baby while in the womb, or by a newborn baby, can be correspondingly destructive to the development of neural pathways, and destructive to the neural pathways that have already been developed, potentially resulting in the development of many different types of neurological disorders (see Neonatal Pain and its Effects and Newborns and Chronic Pain Study: Pain during first days may lead to sensitivity as adult and Newborns Feel Pain and Neonatal Pain and Touch and Babies Don't Feel Pain: A Century of Denial in Medicine and Circumcision and Pain and Prevention and Management of Pain and Stress in the Neonate and Informed Consent for Medically Necessary Circumcision). In fact, a general pattern can be discerned from this area of research, that being that love and beauty tendered to a baby while in the womb or newly born, can result in the development of complex and intricate neural pathways in the brain of the baby, which is a key to the potential intelligence of the baby as it grows into a child; conversely, hate and pain inflicted upon a baby while in the womb or when newly born, can result in the destruction of already existing neural pathways, which is a key to the development of different types of neurological disorders.

In March of 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics announced that they had concluded that there is no weight of medical evidence in favor of routine neonatal male infant circumcision and that babies being circumcised actually DO feel the pain. Because of this, the AAP claimed, they would no longer recommend circumcision as a routine neonatal operation, and have now stated that circumcision should be an "ethical" choice.

By using simple logic in analyzing the matter, it can be suspected that autism could be related to the imposition of the practice of infant circumcision, and such an observation could be made if a pattern was found which indicated a substantially greater number of circumcised boys in the United States of America are victims of autism than are little girls. If this is true, then autism is apparently the response of a baby to the terrible pain which has been inflicted upon them during the early days of life in this world by the people around them whom they identify as the perpetrators of the act, thus causing a separation and a withdrawal away from those people and that world which inflicted the terrible pain on the baby.
Autism Society of America: What is Autism? - "Autism is a complex developmental disability that typically appears during the first three years of life. The result of a neurological disorder that affects the functioning of the brain, autism impacts the normal development of the brain in the areas of social interaction and communication skills. Children and adults with autism typically have difficulties in verbal and non-verbal communication, social interactions, and leisure or play activities."

Previously, the above page claimed that "Autism is four times more prevalent in boys than girls and knows no racial, ethnic, or social boundaries." However, apparently due to the exposure of it's possible relationship to circumcision by this page, that claim has now been removed, which implicates the Autism Society in the circumcision conspiracy, and suggests the society is infiltrated with the same people who just might be responsible for the condition in the first place.

While perusing some of the above materials, a correlation to male infant circumcision can initially be made when it is discovered that Autism is four times more prevalent in boys than girls, and such a corollary might be valuable to modern-day unbiased research which could begin with the question: "In the womb and after birth, how are autistic children being treated mentally, physically, and spiritually, what types of experiences are they receiving since their conception, and what is being done to them that could cause them any sort of neurological disease?" Claims by some people that such links to the origin of autism have in the past been disproven by medical science, cannot be accepted as valid when the related research has been performed by the same individuals and organizations that have been long-time supporters of routine infant circumcision.

long-long time ago in ancient Egypt, when jews were slaves there. Slaves and servants were marked by circumcision. The jews GTFO of Egypt, but kept that as a tradition.

(Or at least that's the word on the streets.)

So maybe the jews at the very top don't really do it cause they know it symbolizes slavery, but they want everyone else to do it for the same reason.

It became very widely used in America during the Victorian era.

Mainly because removing the foreskin made the head of the penis less sensitive, and it was thought that this would discourage young boys from touching themselves. It wasn't always done at birth, and sometimes even as a punishment. The Victorians used that, along with devices such as chastity belts to prevent "sinful" sexual acts.

It was also used back then because it made the risk of infection much less, both for men and for the women they had sex with. Keep in mind, this was from when people didn't bathe often, and the foreskin and the head of the penis would become very dirty because of that. This made infection a problem.

Now that we bathe every day, there's really no need for circumcision. Aside from that, I'm very upset that part of my penis was cut off without my consent, and wish great pain upon my parents, wherever they may be.

I'm very upset that part of my penis was cut off without my consent, and wish great pain upon my parents, wherever they may be.

Yeah, I'm pissed too. Were you left for adoption or something?

I'm uncut. I bathe every day...and guess what? No infection!!

Yea...its a fucking conspiracy damn jews

long-long time ago in ancient Egypt, when jews were slaves there. Slaves and servants were marked by circumcision. The jews GTFO of Egypt, but kept that as a tradition.

(Or at least that's the word on the streets.)

So maybe the jews at the very top don't really do it cause they know it symbolizes slavery, but they want everyone else to do it for the same reason.

Modern archeological discoveries have revealed that Jews weren't actually slaves of the egyptians. They were actually skilled masons, and other tradesmen.

To say that circumcision is barbaric to to insult barbarians. It is an inhumane, superstitious and cruel practice.

Boys whose parents colluded in their sexual mutilation have, I think, a rather valid reason to kill them. At any rate , the circumcision defense would make for a hell of an entertaining trial.

To the supposed health "benefits" of circumcision:

Really? Really?? How much of a filthy swine does one have to be where having no foreskin improves health? It's almost as if these pro-circumcision lobbies have never heard of fucking soap. If your only method of smegma-prevention is removing part of your genitals, then by all means, take the rusty knife over by the countertop...

Uncircumsised dicks are fugly

Uncircumsised dicks are fugly

lamest. argument. ever.

Im circumcised and I like it. Yall are just fucking weird. Also, un cut dicks look fucking disgusting.

Im circumcised and I like it. Yall are just fucking weird. Also, un cut dicks look fucking disgusting.

You have just been conditioned to think that. If people did genital bisections to infant males at birth, people would probably consider normal penises to be weird and disgusting.

For all I know, the doctor that did it to me saves the foreskins up until he has a few dozen, then stir fries them and eats them while he prances around his condo wearing female lingerie.

You have just been conditioned to think that. If people did genital bisections to infant males at birth, people would probably consider normal penises to be weird and disgusting.

For all I know, the doctor that did it to me saves the foreskins up until he has a few dozen, then stir fries them and eats them while he prances around his condo wearing female lingerie.

ahahaha

this.

To everyone who says uncut dicks look ugly.

You're probably dudes, and all dicks look ugly to you. For that to be a valid argument, we need unbiased female opinions. I'm uncut(not having a need for it when born ftw), I get no complaints from anyone I've fucked around with. To be honest, my friend who is cut, has had some of the same chicks I have(not at the same time, sorry no orgys for you). and they said they liked me better.

boosh.

The sanitation argument is lame when you realize women dont get infections that make them lose parts of themselves all the time. I am sure the same bacteria can grow in the folds of girly parts too.

To everyone who says uncut dicks look ugly.

You're probably dudes, and all dicks look ugly to you. For that to be a valid argument, we need unbiased female opinions. I'm uncut(not having a need for it when born ftw), I get no complaints from anyone I've fucked around with. To be honest, my friend who is cut, has had some of the same chicks I have(not at the same time, sorry no orgys for you). and they said they liked me better.

boosh.

I'm female and don't really have a preference. Although in the off chance that I do ever reproduce, if I have a boy, he sure as hell won't be getting part of his dick chopped off.

Why the hell don't they use painkillers when they do it? Shit, people knock their dogs out and give them painkillers when they get their balls chopped off, why don't they have the decency to do the same for their own child?

I'm female and don't really have a preference. Although in the off chance that I do ever reproduce, if I have a boy, he sure as hell won't be getting part of his dick chopped off.

Why the hell don't they use painkillers when they do it? Shit, people knock their dogs out and give them painkillers when they get their balls chopped off, why don't they have the decency to do the same for their own child?

They use some bullshit topical ointment. I doubt the doctors would use it on themselves.

Afterall, it's not like babies have any feelings anyways. :rolleyes:

They use some bullshit topical ointment. I doubt the doctors would use it on themselves.

Afterall, it's not like babies have any feelings anyways. :rolleyes:

i read/heard somewhere that babies have a nervous system about 3 times more sensitive than an adults.... oh, it was on that episode of Bullshit about circumcision.

so the pain is more so than you or i could imagine....

lamest. argument. ever.

Yeah, seems to be the normal response from the Pro-Penis-Mutilation people. "Oh but it looks so much better".. lol. Looks aren't everything children. You know once you remove the foreskin not only do you loose a large portion of nerves that give pleasure, but you deaden the head of the penis since there is nothing to protect it from foreign material.. ei pants, underwear. So you loose even more sensation at the tip of your penis. So, more nerves = better orgasms = better sex. I don't know how people still do this to their baby boys. I mean people are logical beings, and this is clearly illogical. Come on people.. even if you're still set on chopping your poor babies foreskin off, please give them the choice later in life. They'll never be able to return their manly bits to its original, superior self again.

...and stop saying shit like "it helps fight infections/bacteria.." Just wash you fucking dick, don't be stupid.

Circumcision costs money.

A lot of doctors are Jews.

Jews brainwash people into circumcision.

Incorrect on several counts, you ignorant slut.

Jewish circumcision is a primitive religious rite, performed without cost (except for the cost of pain and suffering inflicted on the helpless infant) by a rabbi who specializes in such things.

Muslims do the same thing, so why not blame them?

so the pain is more so than you or i could imagine....

Amen--those poor kids aren't screaming their heads off because they are so happy!

Circumcision is likely a christian "consipracy". It's designed to make masturbation painful.

YYou know once you remove the foreskin not only do you loose a large portion of nerves that give pleasure, but you deaden the head of the penis since there is nothing to protect it from foreign material.. ei pants, underwear. So you loose even more sensation at the tip of your penis. So, more nerves = better orgasms = better sex.

This.

I pity people who are circumcised.

Incorrect on several counts, you ignorant slut.

Jewish circumcision is a primitive religious rite, performed without cost (except for the cost of pain and suffering inflicted on the helpless infant) by a rabbi who specializes in such things.

Muslims do the same thing, so why not blame them?

I think the main point was, they cost money.
and then the foreskins are sold to pharmaceutical companies.


so this whole, "foreskin is ugly thing" should be a pharmaceutical conspiracy.

there is one reason an one reason only for circumcision. and lucky for you i am gonna let you in on it.

as we all know the foreskin is approximately 1/25 of an inch thick. what most of us dont know is that w-rays only penetrate surfaces 1/24 of an inch thick. as most of you know w-ray or wellingtonishingtonishingtonish rays come from outerspace, what most of you dont know is where in outerspace these w-rays come from. venus. that is right, the ancestoral home of the jews. starting to make sense isnt it.

you see contrary to popular belief not all the jews were expelled from venus in 8000 bc during the tractorian wars. a few remained underground, hidden if you will. it was there in the deepest caverns of venus that the jews discovered the power of the W-rays. they saw that if they removed the foreskin from a males penis that they(the jews) would be able to transmit their thoughts into the mans second brain. and from this second head they would be able to control the whole person.

hitler knew this. that is why he tried to kill all the jews. that is why he developed his rocket program. not to bomb britian, but instead to invade Venus. the ancestral home of the jews. hitler knew that they (the jews) were trying to talk to him via his penis. that is why hitler actually cut off his own dick, in order to make himself completely immune form any possible W-ray infiltration. that is why the jews could not control him like they were able to control Stalin and Franklin Delanor Roosevelt.

circumcision has nothing to do with custom, culture or physical attraction. it has to do with mind control. and more importantly the jews. the jews that try and control our minds. make us into them. they talk to me through my penis. that is how i know this to be true. that is why i cut off my own dick, just like the fuer. sieg heil.

Infact did you know that all of the plane pilots during 9/11 were circumcised. coincidence? haha. i think not. the jews using the w-rays were able to control the pilots an make them crash into those buildings, via their penises. triggering a war in the middle east. allowing them (the jews) to make even more money off of newspaper sales and advertising time on their tv stations.

dont believe me? check out this list of circumcised people. george w bush, bill clinton, ho chi mon, frank zappa, dennis rodman, tony blair, hans blix, santa clause, jerry springer, john mccain, mitt romney, barack obama, and geroge carlin. just to name a few. all of them circumcised, all of them jewish agents. trying to take over the world. trying to talk to us via our penises. trying to steal our gold, our silver, our copper, and our diamonds. but we can not let them. we must not let them.

the only way to save ourselves from the coming jewish storm is to follow in the foot steps of adolf hitler. we must cut off the penis of every man woman and child. only then can we be sure that we are truly free an safe from the jewish threat. remember always the numbers 14/88. We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. heil hitler!

This.

I pity people who are circumcised.

Maybe it's a secret plan to stop teen pregnancy by making sex less pleasurable?

As a circumcised male I feel qualified to say that the mere concept of removing the foreskin of someone who can't consent is absolute bullshit. I've gone so far as to confront my own mother on the subject and made it clear that if time travel ever becomes possible within my life I'll be going back and killing her after I'm born but before she consents to my dick being whacked.

Since one good whackjob theory desrves another, here is mine.

Circumcized men harbor a great amount of anger towards their mothers in particular and women in general. Few are aware of it.

I bet that pretty much all serial killers are circumcized, and their killing of women is a way of acting out their unexpressed rage against mumsy.