"Womyn" should be banned. Sycophants thereof should be banned. If this is done, you will find nine out of ten voices in grateful assent. This isn't a bloody democracy, just get rid of the pests.

I am not sure I get it? Some women like April and others have made many constructive posts in the family section and home schooling section.

Explain further please. :)

I am not sure I get it? Some women like April and others have made many constructive posts in the family section and home schooling section.

Explain further please. :)

Right, April is fine. I don't think anyone could raise the same objection to her as to the behavior of the "womyn". I do not mean April or, say, Blondie. I like these two. I especially like Blondie. I don't even mind Carrigan so much. I particularly want to eliminate the two cunts and their clique of sycophants, in addition to a few other ne'er-do-wells, Intrepid and Fade for example. Every forum has its incorrigible hecklers, but this one should not: I therefore, again, recommend myself for the position of moderator. I would make short work of these people, and the remainder would thank me for it. And if they don't, they are poisoned by indulgence. My aim in this would be to develop a stronger core of members, to promote camaraderie therein, and encourage individual composure.

No one of loyalty should continue to believe that we "need" these people to keep up some feeling of "true democracy", for this places us right back in the pan simmering with the rest of Amurrica. To reproduce in miniature the same errors as the Jew likes to see in the mass is the surest way to keep our ranks at the lowest level. The forum might be trivial, ultimately, but I see potential in each worthwhile member to be more than a "forum member". Intrepid and Fade have, no doubt, read more obscure titles than Miller or myself—but this is very far from proving their worth. So far as I can tell, these guys come here just to be bugbears, to blur the lines a little for their own amusement. No one should get all huffy and whelp about VNN becoming like Stormfront, because at bottom Stormfront caters to weakness and VNN to forthrightness: but forthrightness contains a fatal seed—indulgence. A line must be drawn, as anywhere else, and that line is precisely where forthright Aryan ideas and humor end, and sick, captious trouble-making begins.

What's your stance on banning idiots?

A tall order, but again, I have the time. The wheat must be separated from the chaff.

A tall order, but again, I have the time. The wheat must be separated from the chaff.

That one went right over head there, pal :)

What's your stance on banning idiots?

His Mr. Outis incarnation had much more of the side-splitting, land of the bizarre angles, though. VNN doesn't get much better than this surreal exchange with Mr. 10,000. :http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=9027&page=3&pp=10

Nevertheless, hope is enduring, as well as everlasting, in the quest for new, oddly-tuned characters to fill out the roster.

He was Mr Outis? Wow he wrote my favorite article ever posted on the VNN main page. That article was what made me post on VNNF. So you all know he is the reason I post here.

His Mr. Outis incarnation

OK, I'll bite. What would that be, Sean?

I hope it wasn't "Anne"?

As it happens, I knew very well who Matt Hale is, and had seem him speak in Yorktown—in fact I broke up with a girlfriend over that demonstration, as she insisted on playing anti-fa with a bunch of punks from across the water, who will no doubt make trouble again on the 25th; anyway, I was feigning ignorance of Hale to make a simple point which was bound to go unremarked by anyone, as are most of my points. I don't think this should have been disinterred, though, as 10k and I have buried the hatchet.

His Mr. Outis incarnation had much more of the side-splitting, land of the bizarre angles, though. VNN doesn't get much better than this surreal exchange with Mr. 10,000. :http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=9027&page=3&pp=10

Nevertheless, hope is enduring, as well as everlasting, in the quest for new, oddly-tuned characters to fill out the roster.

I particularly want to eliminate the two cunts and their clique of sycophants

Do tell, sir. Am I one of these cunts that you would like to see banished?

Do tell, sir. Am I one of these cunts?

Are you kidding?

Are you kidding?


Up until a couple of days ago, I had never noticed any of your posts. So do tell, great one, what it is that you find so disagreable about me, that you would want me to be banned. I am very saddened. :(

Up until a couple of days ago, I had never noticed any of your posts. So do tell, great one, what it is that you find so disagreable about me, that you would want me to be banned. I am very saddened. :(

That, right there. Every other post is some sarcastic, look-at-how-cute-I-can-be load of crap. You really think being a smartass justifies your presence; and you will never be convinced otherwise. Not in a hundred years could anyone convince you of any point, however small, which might lead to a decrement in your self-esteem or a mere revision of your approach, much less prompt you to actually ask yourself if your behavior is appropriate, and much, much less move you to actually change it, and why should you? We would rather see you simply disappear; we know well enough that you are too fucking stupid to ever realize that you are utterly worthless to us. This is as it should be, for every creature wishes to preserve itself and its domain of control, which in humans is expressed as self-esteem—and this can be downright dogged, more tenaciously blind than any other living thing on Earth, especially in the stagnant sex, your own.

So there you have it, and that will be my last to you or anyone associated. I will continue to agitate to become a moderator, and if I do, you and your circle will be eliminated. Cheerio.

That, right there. Every other post is some sarcastic, look-at-how-cute-I-can-be load of crap. You really think being a smartass justifies your presence;

why do you assume sarcasm in my post. WRONG :o It is true that I am very sad because of your dislike for me. And my question, that you could not give a decent answer, is why do you dislike me so much?

You are a very angry fellow. :(

You do make a valid point: if you don't notice someone, I guess he doesn't exist. Kind of like a woman isn't beautiful till a man tells her so.
Probably your refusal to post pics of your oeuvre titled Massacre at Red Lake in the medium of menstrual blood.

The bottom line is that these boards would be better off sans "womyn". Her notice of me is irrelevant. Her m.o. is plain as day to anyone casually browsing these boards: the ubiquitous cunt who delights in word-twisting and all that. Just as Intrepid fills the role of Mr. Pointed Wit, and you that of Contrarian Wit. KLM, you'll remember, I found a simply Involuted Wit, which is novel enough to not be truly offensive, though in general I find the readiness to condescend here repulsive, and that was a cardinal mistake of mine before. (I also think, btw, KLM is a well-informed, amusing fellow.) Anyway, these types are reproduced on any board of note, in fact on any forum, online and off. This is ineluctable owing to basic demographical trends, but that is not to say certain really disagreeable types cannot be excised; and I believe, given the importance of VNN - actual or potential importance - that they must be excised. This is not ANUS or the Livertaryan Green Yatzi Partah. I imagine for every soul partially awakened by the latter, VNN shook ten more out of Jew-imposed blindness through sheer guttural force. This force is diluted by such types as "womyn", play-patricians, self-righteous spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend teams, pornographic hecklers & accusers, etc. I guess I will hark back to and paraphrase the first words I ever heard out of the mouth of a White Nationalist (Hale), about 12 years ago: If you could push a little red button that would instantly get rid of such types, wouldn't you do it? — And, hey, if that includes me, so be it!

Why would you think that? :confused:

I hope it wasn't "Anne"?

Why would you think that? :confused:

I don't know? I have dinner riding on this, man. Do you really want to force Doppel to have my grandmother's leftover chicken cutlets?

Anyway, I believe your comment - which appeared shortly after Linder posted "Anne" - was something like, "no offense to Mr. Outis, who wrote one of my favorite articles", etc. So, which was it? I hardly remember what I wrote. All I remember was that we had a good thread going about relocating to Eurasia and Von Boffmeister (please allow me this one bit of mockery!) stomping his foot because we didn't take him literally when he said, "my own fuckin' Israel!!!"

That, right there. Every other post is some sarcastic, look-at-how-cute-I-can-be load of crap. You really think being a smartass justifies your presence; and you will never be convinced otherwise. Not in a hundred years could anyone convince you of any point, however small, which might lead to a decrement in your self-esteem or a mere revision of your approach, much less prompt you to actually ask yourself if your behavior is appropriate, and much, much less move you to actually change it, and why should you? We would rather see you simply disappear; we know well enough that you are too fucking stupid to ever realize that you are utterly worthless to us. This is as it should be, for every creature wishes to preserve itself and its domain of control, which in humans is expressed as self-esteem—and this can be downright dogged, more tenaciously blind than any other living thing on Earth, especially in the stagnant sex, your own.

So there you have it, and that will be my last to you or anyone associated. I will continue to agitate to become a moderator, and if I do, you and your circle will be eliminated. Cheerio.

I wouldn't call her worthless but she could be so much more important on the forum if she would stop being so sensitive about our negative comments directed at women. In fact, we could learn a lot from her if she was willing to help us understand the female mindset. For example, why are women especially afraid of aggressive words like "Hate" and generally choose surrender over conflict the majority of the time? I've seen these White mothers trying to keep "Hate" away from their children but it seems to me that "Hate" or any form of suggested violence triggers an automatic negative Biological reaction in most women even when that so called "Hate" is only done to protect her and other White women like her.

HitlerGoddess, you might not have these negative quirks but surely as a female you are qualified to help us understand what it is about racialism which frightens the majority of White women?

But that is precisely it, Otto—it is precisely as woman that she is least qualified to speak of woman. Everyone knows you generally cannot trust an artist who speaks of his work: so much more for women speaking of woman. I have already offered sufficient explanation of woman's incapacity to rise to the occasion of our case: she is the stagnant sex. Her instinct is always for comfort and peace, for her biological role is, unfortunately for her arrogance, inescapably that of incubation. This need for peace prompts her to compromise and level. I'll never forget the way my mother used to always say, when witnessing an argument, "You're both acting ridiculous, please stop!" This is a skirting of justice, pun intended, for it levels the field making all responsible. This, then, is the tortuous "point" Hitler Goddess fell back on when pushed into a corner: that her stance is not the equality of woman at man's best, but the equality of man and woman at humanity's worst. This is what it all came down to, she claimed. Women will invariably come up with some heinous load of crap like this when all else fails, just as every average joe will tell you that he "hates ALL degenerates", because he sees "bad people of EVERY color". While they claim to eh, hate Hate, I guess, they will not hesitate to claim that they have this huge beef with Degeneracy As Such, like suddenly the world is again reducible to Platonic Ideals and the ensuing centuries of work in tearing that fallacy down were for nothing; anything to skirt the issue, anything not to admit that they're just argumentative cowards. Anyway, elsewhere I have suggested, simply enough, that woman sues for peace and equality and love and comfort and miscegenation because, having been learned by the Jew, and in the case of WN girls unlearned by whomever, she is at bottom the cruder organism. The crude stagnate and spread, while the refined progress and evolve. Women squat to piss and to think; men run about and rule the Earth. So, I tell you, asking her about her own shortcomings is like asking the pig why it don't sing. She finds the harsher aspects of "our thing" so just because she is a woman and woman is not biologically equipped to give battle or countenance the rhetoric of warriors, who are often upset and want to cut off heads when their way of life is threatened. This is surely why, having had their duties obliterated by the Jew, some women act aggressively - or just bitchy - toward everyone: pointless skirmishes to make up for her own wretchedness. At heart, woman does feel that she is damaged, though she'd never admit it, and will fly off the handle with all the fury of the self-resentful when questioned. Men do this as well, for they too have been "reinterpreted".

In a sense, Hitler Goddess and I are equal on one point: neither of us desire children. She because she is modern cunt, I because it is unnecessary and, as I say, prohibitive to the cause. Now, I don't suggest that a man dies when he has a child; but you see that VNN has languished a bit of late, no? This is not meant as a jab at Linder, only a basic point to be made: children require attention, and modern men, who generally have little to do except work, are bound to sacrifice precious energy thereto. I just read that Spain, neck-and-neck with Canada in anti-Aryan faggotry, has passed a law requiring men to do more housework.

And in closing, I wish to emphasize that Hitler Goddess' attempts at levelling are in the same bag of tricks as the aversion to "Hate" and all harsher sentiments. Whoever comes to you and says, "but so-and-so is just as bad!", is your enemy. Yes, we know so-and-so can be just as bad. We're all aware. It is nothing new. It is obvious. But by abstracting the Bad like that, Hitler Goddess and other womyn place themselves in the camp of leftist rhetoric. I think they should just go back to being leftists, if they ever were; they are of no value to us. They won't breed, they won't shut up, and I've never thought "wow, great post!" when reading their comments. Have you?

I wouldn't call her worthless but she could be so much more important on the forum if she would stop being so sensitive about our negative comments directed at women. In fact, we could learn a lot from her if she was willing to help us understand the female mindset. For example, why are women especially afraid of aggressive words like "Hate" and generally choose surrender over conflict the majority of the time? I've seen these White mothers trying to keep "Hate" away from their children but it seems to me that "Hate" or any form of suggested violence triggers an automatic negative Biological reaction in most women even when that so called "Hate" is only done to protect her and other White women like her.

HitlerGoddess, you might not have these negative quirks but surely as a female you are qualified to help us understand what it is about racialism which frightens the majority of White women?

I should add that their presence would at least be sufferable if they could consider that they need to change their behavior or at the very least consider the analysis of the cause of their behavior I have laid out. Really, you can't blame them for being contentious, because there is a lot said here which would make, say, a negro trying to fit in feel like an absolute stranger, though the Opp forum hosts at least one doggedly perseverant negress whose face I would like step on. But that's life as we see it. Hitler wrote that it must become the honor of every miscreant to sacrifice their fertility so a better German race may be born. It should be the duty of every woman involved here to not get uppity when we bust their balls a little! The sexes will always get in tangles like cats & dogs, but we don't need that here.

I don't think I'm much of a contrarian, and I don't think I'm that witty. Linder is witty, Wilde is witty. But occasionally some do beg to be swatted.

Taken separately, you are not that witty or contrarian, but you do have a free-roving contrarian wit: and I appreciate that you will swat just about anyone, it is always light enough to not be really offensive. "Stinging lessons".

Prozak will never respond to my taunts, and he is consistently robotic, which is the only reason I like him. Did you see his "Hessian Unity" post? what in God's name is that? Other than his ostensible mission to drag before us every bizarre quasiphilosophy like a juggling Cagliostro, he is an ordinary Yes-man. As I said, every grouping has its types, and his type is Esoteric Minimalist. He specializes in arcana and long movement-names, like von Boffmeister did, but with ten times the style. The Baron von Ungern-Sternberg. Pentti Linkola. Optimistic-Environmentalist National-Socialistic Nihilist-Traditionalism of the Avardiatanita Order of Buddhist Radicals. Etc.

You're right about the red button metaphor. I only brought it up to close a paragraph, not as an idea to promote.

One more thing, what appealed to me in Linder's writing were the pyrotechnics of his language reacting with the truth: a volatile mix. Not the potty mouth per se, but the irreverence - genuine irreverence - because human fungibility is the only superseding sacred. No one else was writing about race/reality this way.

That is of course more accurate. Linder is the only living disciple of Mencken. Anyone who can really take over the spirit of a great iconoclastic writer will capture souls, and I believe this, at bottom, is what we need more of. Consider Oriana Fallaci's last book: she takes on the guise of Cecco Angiolieri himself, my favorite Italian poet. Now, it requires no proof to assert that not five in a million Italians know who he is, but for those who do know it is a real treat. — There is play in Linder's sooth-saying, and that is indeed what captured me.

http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=225305&postcount=35

Interesting. It is strange to have started out with much less than "naïve zealotry", pre-disillusioned as it were, but struggling with the violent opposite of the "Nietzschean balance"—finding it impossible to live with what one knows and so advocating forthright self-destruction, of which, at bottom, I am still an advocate. You see, I still feel that knowledge of Jewry actually negates what one learned, and learned to be, from Nietzsche; it pulls one back down to Earth, giving one a much more grisly enemy than Welt- or Selbstschmerz; it even thrusts concern for the state of one's soul completely aside in the sense of urgency produced by awareness of the Jewish pest. In fact, I believe it gives a face to a lot of what was then beginning to poison Nietzsche's time and in particular his own mind. You are probably aware that at one point most of his friends were Jews: Rée, Salomé, Zimmerman, Brandes, and Strindberg with his Jew wife; he was one of the first New Goyim. His first translators and promoters were invariably Jews: Brandes, Zimmerman, Levy, Kaufmann. Struggling against the "Jewish" Nietzsche: Thomas Common, Anthony Ludovici, Elisabeth Nietzsche, and to this day RJ Hollingdale. Nietzsche is really the most important intellectual battlefield of Aryan versus Hebrew, in my opinion, for far above his personal susceptibility to the flattering worldliness of Jews, he naturally kept to his own course and proposed the most novel challenge of the 19th and all subsequent centuries - the self-conscious evolution of the organism known as human - so naturally he would be the first to attract a heavy swarm of kikery to wrest him from the Aryan camp. As Klages noted with rather superficial disdain, Nietzsche is the Jew's best friend—but that is hardly Nietzsche's fault.

Harking back for a moment: I believe that the incomplete displacement of Nietzschean education, which itself is almost never complete, by the Jewish question is what leads some superficial minds - for example, Prozak - to theorize that what is needed first is a stabilization of the soul in the manner of yogiism. And the cause of that, at bottom, is a lack of force, but intellectually it is expressed as caution and the desire for self-helping "groundwork", when in fact the great task of improving ourselves and our species is most impossible in the world created by the Jew: first drain the swamp, then plant your crops. The Third Reich in its progressive areas was an application of Nietzsche's darkest Nachlassgedanken. Anyone who has read The Will to Power will know what I mean. The Jew has been most eager since then to water Nietzsche down as much as possible, for in every word of his works he militates against the depressing dead weight of the Jewish spirit and "modernity". Anyone who believes the task of evolution is served by becoming weeds in the cracks of modernity is fooled by their own vanity and lack of vigor. We had our chance; the rest is attrition.

In a sense, Hitler Goddess and I are equal on one point: neither of us desire children. She because she is modern cunt, I because it is unnecessary and, as I say, prohibitive to the cause.
Where are you getting your information? HG has said several times that she does want to have children, just not a ton of them. I am the one who doesn't want children, and it has nothing to do with being a "modern cunt".

Where are you getting your information? HG has said several times that she does want to have children, just not a ton of them. I am the one who doesn't want children, and it has nothing to do with being a "modern cunt".


I don't know where he is getting any of his information. But it is pretty amusing to watch him go on and on like he knows me, personally, so well. He must be getting the idea that I didn't want children simply because I disagree that having children is all a woman is good for.

I don't know where he is getting any of his information. But it is pretty amusing to watch him go on and on like he knows me, personally, so well.I suppose it's just an issue of his being unable to keep straight in his mind the two cunts on the forum. At any rate I have no idea just why he hates us so much, though I can't say I'm going to lose a second of sleep over it.

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=231807#post231807

All right, it seems I mistook the two positions; however, she exhibits the cuntish attachment to lesser animals which appears in times of cultural overrefinement and decline. Mussolini again: "This is a nation [England] with entire cemetaries devoted to the remains of domestic beasts, with people who sometimes leave all their earthly belongings to their pets in the event of death." And I can't remember, perhaps it was Caesar who berated some women in town for cooing up to stray kitties: "Are our citizens not attractive enough for you?" I believe that is found in Suetonius. Anyway, the race would be better off without her spawn, which would no doubt carry on the plague of her personality, especially were it female. And really, no white child needs a mother with such a casual, diffident opinion of motherhood. I can understand her diffidence, however, from my brief acquaintance with child-rearing. Children are extremely annoying and the chance of good returns on the investment is increasingly endangered.

Where are you getting your information? HG has said several times that she does want to have children, just not a ton of them. I am the one who doesn't want children, and it has nothing to do with being a "modern cunt".

I would have to say we would be better off without your spawn, as well. And most important, I really don't think that someone should be having children, when they would say this about pedophiles:

In the fight against Jewry I would rather have queers and, yes, pedophiles at my side, provided they are of die-hard loyalty and masculine character, than such women.”

Would you allow these pedopiles, provided they are of die-hard loyalty and masculine character, of course to be around your children?

Admirable simplicity there, but it will go unheeded. You can convince them of nothing. Again, VNN is a big lunch table to these people. They will twist everything, accuse one of anything, so they can appear to each other to come out on top. I will ask Alex if he will consider granting me moderator status, as the others are not inclined to be ruthless. It is worth a shot, I think.

I think your debate tactics above are what he's talking about here. This ped thing is your hypothesizing - reverse "abstracting the Bad" - to make this guy look OOOOH, EVIL. He said he's not even going to have kids.

He calls you stupid and you call him evil.

THamilton: Is there anything in life that you enjoy? Or do you think enjoying anything at all is bad and distracting to the "movement"?

The impression I get is that you're like an old "fire-n-brimstone" joyless Christian. Except for some reason I doubt you're a Christian. But there is a distinct sense of joylessness and abhorance for anything fun as "distracting".

I mean, do you consider me useless because I respect women (not "womyn", who think being a businesswoman is actually fulfilling something in her life, but women like Toni who obviously love homemaking and raising kids, but also has a passing interest in politics, etc) and plan to have children sometime in the future?

Who are you in this fight for, if not for our women to be safe and for our children to grow up and be educated properly and to achieve peace and purity for the people?

I don't mean to be insulting, just trying to get a better feel for your position. I'm sort of a third-positionist as I still see some things from a Left point of view (for example, seeing internationalist corporations as as big a threat if not more than Jews, along with traitor Whites who love Jews as a worse enemy than Jews (who are merely parasites taking adavantage of a very sick and weakened nation & people and will be easy to get rid of once we purge our own race)), so I'm sure I disagree with a lot of people here on a few things, as people here seem to be more in the right-wing mindset.

BTW, I also wouldn't be so quick to write off Pixi and HG. Pixi contributes cash to TAA (and she's a poor college student like me) and I know HG passed out TA a couple times with Derrick. Thats more than a LOT of people have done. They not be so serious on the forum, but so what? Life isn't about rigidness and being wound-to-tight. You gotta have a sense of humor and have a little fun. A guy would snap in this shitty world if he doesn't have fun every once in a while. I mean, I have stomach ulcers, at 21, because of the stress of living in this soulless, unthinking society and being pissed off about it.

Even the berserkers got plastered and tripped on amanita mushrooms. :cool:

Right, April is fine. I don't think anyone could raise the same objection to her as to the behavior of the "womyn". I do not mean April or, say, Blondie. I like these two. I especially like Blondie. I don't even mind Carrigan so much. I particularly want to eliminate the two cunts and their clique of sycophants, in addition to a few other ne'er-do-wells, Intrepid and Fade for example. Every forum has its incorrigible hecklers, but this one should not: I therefore, again, recommend myself for the position of moderator. I would make short work of these people, and the remainder would thank me for it. And if they don't, they are poisoned by indulgence. My aim in this would be to develop a stronger core of members, to promote camaraderie therein, and encourage individual composure.


Pixi and HG tend to bring some light-hearted content to the forum, but I don't see why they should be banned. Those of us with women in our lives might take offense of you referring to white women, especially race-conscious ones, as "cunts".

Seems like you have some issues.

Admirable simplicity there, but it will go unheeded. You can convince them of nothing. Again, VNN is a big lunch table to these people. They will twist everything, accuse one of anything, so they can appear to each other to come out on top. I will ask Alex if he will consider granting me moderator status, as the others are not inclined to be ruthless. It is worth a shot, I think.

Banning everyone that disagrees with your point of view isn't "ruthless", it's cowardly. I agree that forum should be focused and relatively free of flame fests but what make you think the current mods aren't doing their job?

I agree that forum should be focused and relatively free of flame fests but what make you think the current mods aren't doing their job

Because everyone that he disagrees with, or does not "like" has not been banished.

<In the fight against Jewry I would rather have queers and, yes, pedophiles at my side, provided they are of die-hard loyalty and masculine character, than such women-THamilton>

Makes you wonder if they have internet access at the mental hospital. lol

I don't think this poster has been around for more than a couple of days, and all of sudden he wants to be a mod?

I don't think this poster has been around for more than a couple of days, and all of sudden he wants to be a mod?
Scroll up apparently he was Mr Outis a poster from way back.

THamilton: Is there anything in life that you enjoy? Or do you think enjoying anything at all is bad and distracting to the "movement"?

Yes, but I am pushing my line of thought only insofar as I would like to clean up the forum. In general I would like to see VNN more serious, concentrated, with a core membership and a stronger collective sense of purpose. If my bid fails I won't be too disappointed, VNN will always be worth what it is, and, as you say, fun.

The impression I get is that you're like an old "fire-n-brimstone" joyless Christian. Except for some reason I doubt you're a Christian. But there is a distinct sense of joylessness and abhorance for anything fun as "distracting".

That is more or less true. Happiness has always given me a headache.

Men are free to respect women insomuch as they deserve respect, and surely such women exist; one or two are present on the forum. Cunts deserve the boot only. There, now—I have said I do not judge you useless for respecting respectable women; but do you believe these officious beings are of any use to the cause itself? I do not wish to slight anyone who has done their bit of activism or to play off one person's activity against another's. I am asking you if you feel that our mission is served by having these lying, officious, lunch-table finger-pointing cunts around, free to slander anyone who objects to their behavior? do you feel that camaraderie is developed by allowing them to call us gay, psychotic or the rest? don't you think there's enough of that going around elsewhere, that we here deserve a break from such vile slander? Suppose for a moment that we actually won a certain kind of victory in the real world—mass readership, a public access show, an election campaign: do you doubt that these slanderous cunts would be anything but slanderous even in that event? do you think they would revise their behavior? And really, so what if they did? In whatever way incline to envision the future of the White race and the camp of warriors fighting for it, you cannot escape the conclusion that the only positive role for a woman is mother. In every scenario - economic collapse; insurrection; campaigning; or just online media - they are more a sore spot than an asset. Would you really want a guy like Intrepid around even if we made some kind of gain? what would he have to say? He spends literally all of his time here acting witty at the expense of everyone else. If he were a Jew, he'd be canned immediately. People here are all, "SPLC? Jew spy?", about me and whomever else happens to give them a jolt, yet no one - to my knowledge - sees the masturbatory behavior of Intrepid as undesirable. He's supposed to be a resident cynic, I guess. Oh Intrepid, you devil, you. Smashing retort, haha, you drew me out this time, sir! You and the others are so mystified by my attitude, yet you would never succeed in wresting a plain conversation out of Intrepid. I have encountered his type before. There is no use for it. He should not be allowed to remain because he can fashion an insult better than anyone else.

I am in this fight to give Jewry an incredible shock. Any "for" is ancillary to me, at best a rhetorical tool, because I have no "for" and, moreover, I believe "for" is outmoded. Linder and AE, by contrast, have a good "for". They are active for the good of their why, I am active for the sake of mine. I would not presume that any of my actions or the ideology motivating them are for the sake of Linder's or AE's family; I trust they would just go "say what?" to such a claim. Any movement or platform, or group of dissenters, will have conflicting ideas, aims and methods. I believe my own are secondary to the foundation laid down by Linder—in other words I subordinate my own standpoint for the sake of advancing the potential of another's.

I am with you on the importance of traitor whites. I am not with you on Jews being "merely parasites", not at all. Jews are the primum mobile, and even if they were proven to be otherwise, we should still have to speak and act as though they were, for above all we must cripple International Jewry. First you drain the swamp, then you build the house. On the other hand, for a beginning to be made here, it is of course necessary to purge our ranks—and who better to start with than officious females and their sycophant males?

On the other hand, for a beginning to be made here, it is of course necessary to purge our ranks—and who better to start with than officious females and their sycophant males?

How about with individuals who are obviously not hitting on all eight. Occasionally one must look in the mirror, no?

Would you really want a guy like Intrepid around even if we made some kind of gain? what would he have to say? He spends literally all of his time here acting witty at the expense of everyone else. If he were a Jew, he'd be canned immediately. People here are all, "SPLC? Jew spy?", about me and whomever else happens to give them a jolt, yet no one - to my knowledge - sees the masturbatory behavior of Intrepid as undesirable. He's supposed to be a resident cynic, I guess. Oh Intrepid, you devil, you. Smashing retort, haha, you drew me out this time, sir! You and the others are so mystified by my attitude, yet you would never succeed in wresting a plain conversation out of Intrepid. I have encountered his type before. There is no use for it. He should not be allowed to remain because he can fashion an insult better than anyone else.

Dear THamilton,

Although we have, for all intents and purposes, hardly spoken, you've taken a great fancy to me. Due to this fact, I'm overfilled with joy, much akin to the apparent rapture Julie Andrews must've been in while frolicking through the Austrian countryside in The Sound of Music.

Please don't stop!

Best regards,

Trep

RE: Intrepid

How did you know he was Mr. Outis? :rolleyes:

Try another one asshole.

Well, you won't have to worry about HG or Pixley coming in and posting much anymore. They are over at the Snora laughing and giggling with the homosexuals (fagthedouchebag) Mongrels (anime animal) degenerates (synikil) neo-cons (Intrepid) and REAL FEMINISTS (Carrigan). If there were ever anyone to go for the throat THamilton, it's that worthless bitch.

I don't really understand why HG and Pixley were targeted for their views, other than they didn't really want to have kids AT THIS TIME. How many of YOU have kids? I didn't see anything especially feminist in their posts, except to come to the defense of their gender. Hey, if a woman came on here and started attacking men, what do you think the reaction would be? This place would go ballistic!!

HG actually did a good job of tussling with kikes, this is what is good about women, they fight and we should let them fight the filthy jews and then roll in with heavy armor when they start to gain the upperhand. That's how it should be in Real life too.

Anyway, if you can stand the smell of clove cigarettes and the lava lamp look, they are over there. :mad:

Cackling in one forum about enemies in another forum, so the enemy won't see it and be able to respond, is weak.

Cackling in one forum about enemies in another forum, so the enemy won't see it and be able to respond, is weak.

Es weibisch ist.

Well, you won't have to worry about HG or Pixley coming in and posting much anymore.
I don't know about HG, but I'm not going to stop posting over here just because the Phora is back up. It takes a lot more than some anonymous internet personality to run me off. ;)

Pixi, I'll tell you straight: you should not go to a thread in another forum to badmouth people's arguments that were made in another thread in another forum. It's not the White way.

Pixi, I'll tell you straight: you should not go to a thread in another forum to badmouth people's arguments that were made in another thread in another forum. It's not the White way.

Maybe not, but I did not say anything different then I would or have said here.

Cackling in one forum about enemies in another forum, so the enemy won't see it and be able to respond, is weak.