Log in

View Full Version : Hitler: The Rise of "Evil" (More Jew Propaganda)


Rob Roy MacGregor
December 5th, 2003, 02:20 PM
http://www.cbs.com/specials/rise_of_evil/

New Jew Buzzword: "Evil"

Looks like the foxes are guarding the henhouse.... again!

bedford
December 5th, 2003, 03:35 PM
That was one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time.
Hitler was portrayed as wimp and a total loser. A much better
movie about Hitler is "The Bunker" with Anthony Hopkins.

PROG
December 6th, 2003, 12:21 AM
I can't believe CBS was actually in fear that they were portraying Adolf Hitler in too good of light. I watched the first 20 minutes of the film and I have never seen Hitler portrayed as such a pig as he was in HITLER: RISE OF EVIL (http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0346293/). I remember a closeup of him stuffing a sandwich into his face as he was talking with his mouth already full, and food was falling out. Adolf Hitler was well known for having great table manners, so you know that was an obvious lie. They threw in every silly thing they could think-up to make him as repulsive as possible.

Mann
December 7th, 2003, 10:08 PM
']... when he orders the deaths of millions of white people.

Well, kind-of white, 67. The way a subterranean fish is white. Not the same white as, for example, a white horse. One is white because it never comes into the light; the other is white because it lives in the light, and the sun makes its hair lighten and glow. Big difference. :)

Tomasz Winnicki
December 8th, 2003, 12:39 AM
Yeah, that movie was shit. It gets five stars of david of Jewish approval.

Of course at the end they managed to throw in the mythical 6,000,000 number. [sarcasm intended] I'm still trying to find out exactly how many Jews were gassed, how many were turned into soap, how many were made into lapshades and how many Jewish bones were used in the construction of the autobhan. Anybody know? I had no idea that Jews could be such a versitile construction material.

Grenadier
December 9th, 2003, 08:38 PM
Why is 67 posting in parts of the forum not intended for antis?

Alex Linder
December 12th, 2003, 07:38 AM
Why is 67 posting in parts of the forum not intended for antis?


Any member can post anywhere. The anti- forum is set apart in that it is for civil debate only.