Premier Broadcast: The Truth Is No Defense

Listen Here (mp3 | 00:05:04)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind1.mp3

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

Welcome to the Broadcast, I'm Geoff Beck

November 30, 2005

If I was being prosecuted for "holocaust denial" I'd like think I'd simply tell the prosecutor to shove it, and consider the matter finished. Well, I’ve never seen the inside of jail nor I have been prosecuted for thought crimes as is Historian David Irving who on Nov 25th was picked up by Austrian police on a 26 year old arrest warrant for questioning the Jew’s holocaust story.

Then days later the other shoe dropped a confession, or perhaps a recantation, or was it as the Guardian newspaper reported a ”repentance.” The full details are not known. But I wouldn't put too much credence in jailhouse confessions, despite the cackling by the Jews and their hired hands. We all know that thousands of Americans confess to crimes which they have not committed, the so called "plea bargain" process. We are told this is done to streamline an overworked justice system. But surely many innocents must also confess to crimes, if only to escape the clutches of the legal gulag system; all confessions especially by political prisoners, which Irving surely is, and which also affect Jewish concerns are to be greeted with great skepticism.

Indeed when it comes to the Jews and their concerns skepticism is the watchword. In the Fall and Winter of 1932 - 33 the late Malcolm Muggeridge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Muggeridge) was touring Russia reporting for the Manchester Guardian. The reports he sent home to Britain were not being well received, many were censored. You see he was telling the truth about the famine which the Jew Lazar Kaganovich supervised in the Ukraine. You might say Muggeridge was the 1930s version of a Holocaust denier.

After his reports exposing the Ukrainian holocaust Muggeridge lost his job. In 1934 he wrote a book lampooning uncritical Western journalists entitled "Winter In Moscow." In this very year, 71 years after the first publication of "Winter In Moscow" that book is still being denounced as "anti-Semitic."

Today the Jews have considerable power but not as much as they had in Bolshevik Russia; it’s been decades since they've been able send writers and historians to their deaths in gulags of Kolyma (http://www.magadanian.com/photos/ph0028.jpg) or Pechora. Still, they are hardly toothless, and my guess is they've had their eyes on Irving for some time. Irving, it must be noted, is not the most vocal and aggressive of WWII revisionists, but his writings are well known and that is the reason he must be discredited.

The Jews first attack against Irving came when Deborah Lipstadt published a book suggesting Irving had denied the Holocaust, a libel case ensued. In that case David Irving defended himself. In contrast the Jews poured millions of dollars into the legal case against him. In the year 2000 Irving was found guilty, after the trial he remarked:

"The leaders of the Jewish communities around the world have used the most horrific methods to try and destroy me. They had bottomless pockets to afford justice and say go ahead and destroy that bastard -- which they just did."

I suggest readers locate Mark Weber's review of the Lipstadt-Irving trial entitled: Judge Gray's Harsh But Predictable Ruling (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2p-2_Weber.html).

However satisfying a legal judgment against Irving was it is not enough. Confessions have an impact which legal judgments don't, the Jews learned this long ago in Bolshevik Russia. The well respected court historian Robert Conquest notes that a public confession has a demoralizing effect on other skeptics and opponents of the regime in power. Defendants which confess forever discredit themselves and often their fellow opponents. In lieu of death camps and outright executions confessions are most effective instrument for silencing opposition.

Keep an eye out for David Irving (http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/index.html) and be sure to read his books, many are available free online. Decide for yourself whether David Irving is a good or bad historian, don't let the controlled media make the decision for you.

Thankyou for listening.

:cheers: Welcome to the VNN Broadcasting Family Geoff!

Another White Man joins the voice of freedom - VNN Radio. Who is next?

Nice to have a short item like this. Pretty reasonable too. Gateway stuff. Thanks Geoff!

Nice to have a short item like this. Pretty reasonable too. Gateway stuff. Thanks Geoff!

Oh, you're welcome.

A couple more have been recorded, the first on Kevin MacDonald's book Separation and Its Discontents and the second on teaching history. Both ought to appear in December.

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/ttindlogo200.jpg

Visit Mr. Beck's page for his latest broadcasts and transcripts:

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Geoff, I listened to your new show early this morning when I was about to keel over from lack of sleep. I learned a lot of detailed facts I hadn't known, and your presentation is quite professional. Glad VNN's media is increasing almost weekly. Then Stan said you have next week's show ready. Just go twice-weekly. More!

Stan did a fine job on the music picks too-- at least, I guess those are his music picks.

I hope "The Truth Is No Defense" can fit onto podcasts. It seems like they may. Judeo studies from the Aryan viewpoint, and you don't even have to attend David Duke's Ukranian University! Aryans are taking up the study of Jewry as surely as they have analyzed us for millennia.

Thanks Chain, your comments mean a lot to me. Your activism, as well as Rounder's motivated me to do something. This is one of the ways I know how to contribute to the movement.

As for this newest Truth is No Defense broadcast (#2) I have to thank Kevin MacDonald. When I first read MacDonald's "Culture of Critique" I nearly vomited, the material was so shocking. I realized then the depth of Jewish ethnocentrism and their predominant role in radical political and social movements. MacDonald is, as you've said, Chain, "the John Locke of our age."

Oh, and Stan to deserves so much credit for helping to bring the production to life.

The Truth is No Defense: 12/06/2005 #2

Listen Here The Truth is No Defense: 12/06/2005 #2 (mp3 | 00:12:09)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

December 6, 2005

Welcome to the Broadcast, I’m Geoff Beck

If you’ve read Kevin MacDonald’s “A Culture of Critique” (CofC) then you may remember Table 1 which contrasts cultural norms of Europeans with those of Jews: differences ranging from kinship and family systems to moral and intellectual grounding. One might generalize from this graph and say Europeans are more individualist than Jews, and this is an important generalization, one that needs to be understood. So, before proceeding with MacDonald’s research I’d like to briefly speak about this phenomenon of individualism.

It is true that whites are more individualists than Jews, but I’d like to also suggest the present state of our people, which might be described as hyper individualist, is not a natural state. There are many reasons for this dangerous state we’ve been led to, but I’d like to consider one reason in particular: the vulnerability of the individual before an organized group; particularly an organized group which controls opinion forming media: this group being the Jews:

“The individual is placed in a minority position and burdened at the same time with a total responsibility. Such conditions make an individualist society fertile ground for modern propaganda. The permanent uncertainty, the social mobility, and the absence of sociological protection and of traditional frames of reference all these provide propaganda with a malleable environment? [so that the individual] can be fed information and conditioned at will.”

So wrote Jacques Ellul in his book Propaganda

With that in mind let’s return to MacDonald. The CofC is a well known book, but in this broadcast I’d like to talk about another of MacDonald’s books, the second in his trilogy documenting Jewish ethnocentrism entitled “Separation and Its Discontents” (SAID). The key to understanding his research is to recognize the collective behavior of groups, and not specific individuals which compromise them: it’s the looking at the entire forest and not a tree. This is often very difficult for our people, not because we lack the innate ability; but rather this critical thinking skill has been systematically suppressed by propaganda from the media; by the government through laws; and by the schools through social conditioning.

When criticizing Jews many counter by citing the accomplishments of such and such doctor, or such and such scientist, redirecting the issue of group accountability unto specific individuals. Whether the cited accomplishments are legitimate or not the question is whether the aggregate effect of organized Jewry upon gentile society is harmful.

European Ethnocentrism, however muted when compared to other groups, was not so long ago a favored characteristic among our kind. If one examines our history from antiquity to WWII one can discover strong in-group and out-group distinctions. My grandmother told me that her brother dragged a Negro off a Houston streetcar and pushed him into the street for sitting in the wrong section of the car. Society in the 1920s expected white men to defend their interests, and keep the blacks under control.

Though, it’s important to place this subject of individualism, collectivism and ethnic interests in a much larger context. European society during the medieval period was organized not along the principle of individualism but was a collective body with numerous layers of hierarchical stratification: a hierarchy with each link in the social stratification owing obligation to those above and assistance to those below. This collective organization of European society, commonly known as the feudal system, endured for a millennium blunting the Muslim invasion and keeping the Jews segregated. Medieval life was very different than our own, but it was a life rich in meaning, and if you’ve traveled Europe and visited the mighty cathedrals and castles one can grasp their high level of accomplishment.

The development of medieval society is connected to the hip with the Catholic Church. But how did this church form? In SAID MacDonald gives special attention to the rise of the early church, with particular emphasis on conflicts between the Christianity and Judaism: “the Christian church in late antiquity was in its very essence the embodiment of a powerful anti-Semitic movement that arose because of gentile concern with resource and reproductive competition with Jews... “ Later he explains that National Socialism in Germany also rose as a response to Jewish ethnocentrism - more on that later.

Today's Christian Zionists might be shocked to learn the early Church fathers were vehement anti-Semites: Eusebius, St, John Chrysotom, St. Cyril, St. Jerome, St. Augustine, and St. Ambrose all expressed outright intolerance of Jews, and often in many different documents and their concerns extended beyond theological disputes with Jews, MacDonald writes that Chrysotom


“describes Jews as numerous and wealthy, and he complains about the wealth of the Jewish Patriarch. He states that the patriarchs are not priests fulfilling a purely religious function, but rather they are shopkeepers and businessmen indicating that Chrysostom viewed Judaism more as an economic entity than a religious organization. Jews are often compared to predatory beasts and are accused of virtually every evil, including economic crimes such as profiteering. The intensely anti-Jewish St. Jerome also refers to Jews as encircling Christians and seeking to tear them apart. Jerome decries the Jew’s love for money in several passages and he complained that the Jews were multiplying "like vermin" a comment that clearly suggests a concern with Jewish reproductive success”.


Considering these sentiments it is not surprising the western church promulgated legal and economic sanctions against Jews; policies, interestingly enough, which favored “popular sentiment by combating the repeated tendencies of rulers [feudal lords] to favor the Jews for their own ends, especially with regard to Jewish money lending.”

The policies adopted by the western medieval Church often favored outright expulsion of Jews and these policies led to the development of a prosperous middle class in western societies, often at the expense of the feudal lords. But much of Eastern Europe had no effective corporate body which opposed the Jews, there segments of the feudal nobility succumbed to Jewish influence, throttling the development of a middle class. Specifically MacDonald mentions the Arenda system in which

“a Jewish agent would lease an estate from a nobleman. In return for a set fee, the leaseholder would have the right to all the economic production of the estate and would also retain control of the feudal rights (including onerous forced labor requirements) over its inhabitants”

So, now we come to the twentieth century.

Chapter 5 of SAID is titled “National Socialism as an Anti-Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy” and is MacDonald’s only extended look at events in the twentieth century. Interestingly most of the focus is not on Hitler and the Nazis, but on Jewish ethnocentrism preceding the emergence of the National Socialist state. The surprising aspect of Chapter 5 is not the words and actions associated with the ideological founders of National Socialism but the words and actions of Germany’s Jews which have a surprising characteristic - a quality which can only be described as racialist.

Consider this quote published in a Zionist journal a few decades before the rise of National Socialism, which MacDonald uses to illustrate Jewish ethnocentrism in Germany

“Those who demand assimilation of us either do not yet know that a man cannot get out of his skin? or else they know this and then expect of us shameful, daily humiliation, which consists in feigning Aryanism, suppressing our instincts, and squeezing into the skin of the Aryan, which does not fit us at all”

Again, MacDonald makes the case that National Socialism was a group evolutionary strategy which developed because of a perception among Germans that their group’s interests were being undermined by Jewish ethnocentrism. And with that in mind consider that Germany’s collapse after WWI precipitated a short lived Bolshevik revolution in Bavaria, organized by a Jew, Kurt Eisner, in 1918. In neighboring Hungary the Jew Bela Khun toppled the government and proclaimed a communist state, and then proceeded to terrorize the populace. And of course Jews also played a predominant role in the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, a revolution most communists thought would first happen in Germany: the mass killings and arrests and the slaughtering of the Tsar’s family in Russia were events many Germans felt were fated for their land; nor could perceptive Germans ignore the role Jews played in the Weimar corruption. As Historian David Irving notes:

“The scale of Germany’s Jewish problem is revealed by an unpublished manuscript by Hitler’s predecessor as chancellor, Dr. Heinrich Bruning. Writing in American exile in 1943 he stated that after the inflation there was only one major German bank not controlled by Jews, some of them ‘utterly corrupt.’ In 1931 he had brought the banks under government supervision, and had had to keep the government’s findings of dishonesty in the banks secret ‘for fear of provoking antisemitic riots.’ “

If you accept MacDonald’s thesis that National Socialism is an Anti-Jewish group evolutionary strategy provoked by Jewish ethnocentrism then it might be asked what type of strategy did the National Socialists use to counter the Jews?

To answer that question I’ll close this broadcast by reading from the opening paragraphs of chapter 5 from SAID:

“The National Socialist movement in Germany from 1933 - 1945 is a departure from Western tendencies toward universalism and muted individualism in the direction of racial nationalism and cohesive collectivism.”

MacDonald continues…

“Most basically, National Socialism aimed at developing a cohesive group. There was an emphasis on the inculcation of selfless behavior and within-group altruism combined with outgroup hostility.”

Now that’s something to think about.

Thanks for listening.

The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #3

Listen Here The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #3 (mp3 | 00:10:32)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

December 9, 2005

Welcome to the broadcast.

Did you hear about the murder of Robert Osborn? On, November 20th, in Kansas City, Missouri, Osborn was bicycling home when two blacks, out of boredom we’re told, shot him for sport. In fact, Osborn was hunted. The blacks after stalking Osborn in their car fired two blasts from a shotgun, missing him. Frustrated they drove ahead of Osborn and waited behind a tree, as Osborn bicycled past the black murderer leapt from his lair and shot Osborn in the head, killing him.

The local media described the killing as “random,” despite the fact that Osborn was white and the killers were black; despite the fact the blacks are 7 times more likely to kill (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/dojstats.htm)than whites; despite, for example, that blacks are only 12% of the US population but have killed 839 whites while, comparatively, whites were only responsible for the deaths of 362 blacks in 1998. Despite all these facts the murder of Robert Osborn was deemed “random.”

Now when I went to school I was taught the word random had certain connotations, such a thing without structure or organization or even something unknown or unexplainable. But there is an explanation for the murder of Robert Osborn. The cause of Robert Osborn's murder lies in the innate biological differences between blacks and whites. Biological differences that have been well investigated, though largely ignored and with tragic consequences. Blacks, for instance, have higher levels of testosterone, a hormone associated with aggression, and lower IQs. There are many more significant biological differences between blacks and whites, and for a deeper explanation of these differences I strongly encourage all curious listeners to acquire Phillipe Rushton's book entitled "Race, Evolution and Behavior (http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/rushton_bio.htm)."

You know the use of adjectives like "random" or "unexplainable" to describe crimes great and small is quite common today. Some years ago I recall seeing Eli Wiesel - the Jewish holocaust activist - on the PBS news program the News Hour. In a rather lengthy segment Wiesel was asked to explain the holocaust: why did it happen, he was asked? Despite considerable rambling Mr. Wiesel failed to explain adequately, I felt, the phenomenon of National Socialism and the "holocaust" incident. Such evil defied explanation, he said. ‘How, how’, Wiesel rhetorically asked, as he shrugged his shoulders, ‘could a modern and progressive state like Germany succumb to such evil.’ How indeed, Mr. Wiesel!

Well, you know, I'm not one to believe in evil spirits, magic, or divine intervention. I think there are rational explanations for way things are. There is a very good explanation for the rise of National Socialism in Germany, and that regime's hostility towards Jews. The events of the twentieth century are hardly unexplainable as Mr. Wiesel would like you to believe. Just as the murder of Robert Osborn is hardly a random.

There’s also been a great deal left unexplained about the Russian Revolution in 1917. The first serious book I read about the Russian Revolution was written by a Polish Jew living in America, name Richard Pipes. Pipe's emphasizes the role of the Intelligentsia, the coterie of intellectuals which he sees as largely responsible for the tragic events of 1917. Pipes weaves a long thread, extending backward centuries, to explain the formation of ideas which propelled Russia into a catastrophe. Though, I’ve reduced Pipes’ arguments greatly, I felt his explanation left much unexplained: how could a nation destroy everything it had known for a millennium? How could a people slaughter their rulers, destroy ancient churches, starve millions, and plunge themselves into civil war. Pipes' explanation just didn't add up in my mind.

Back in the 1970s there was a popular quip, "only Nixon could go to China." By this it was meant that only a supposed staunch anti-communist like Nixon could negotiate with red China. Similarly, I suppose, it takes a Jew to name a Jew. This Jew, though, is not Richard Pipes, but Yuri Slezkine. What Pipes omits in his history of Russia, Slezkine reveals. In his newly released book the "The Jewish Century" Slezkine ‘spills the beans’ about the role Jews played in overthrowing the Russian government, Slezkine tellingly describes Jews as "Stalin's willing executioners." I invite listeners to read Kevin MacDonald’s (http://www.vdare.com/misc/051105_macdonald_stalin.htm) review of Slezkine’s book, which will be linked to in this program’s broadcast transcript posted on VNN Forum.

But really the "beans" were spilled long ago. Even before the revolution had settled down warnings flags were being raised, Winston Churchill wrote in Sunday Herald, 8th February, 1920:

"This movement amongst the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky, Bela Kuhn, Rosa Luxembourg and Emma Goldman, this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing."

Churchill continues

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one. It probably outweighs all others. With the possible exception of Lenin, the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders."

Churchill was not alone in warning the world. But, the warnings went unheeded. With the arrival of Slezkine’s book there seems to be a willingness, within certain narrow corridors, to grudgingly admit the Jew's role in subverting Russia.

If crucial facts can be ignored from titanic historical events think what little lies can be inserted into local news stories, like the murder of Robert Osborn? When researching the case of Robert Osborn I discovered the employees at the grocery store where he worked held a memorial in his name. This murder and the grief it has caused ought never to have happened. If someone had only said "hey, did you read what Jefferson and Lincoln said, those blacks aren't like us and we can't share the same government”. I wonder too if anyone ever asked "hey, did you hear what Churchill said? Look at what they did to Russia. Let’s not let the Jews into our country. They're dangerous and not like us."

If such advice was given it was ignored.

You know, I bet decades in the future some Jew will publish a book explaining that blacks and whites evolved in different circumstances, and it biology and evolution which explain the differences between blacks and whites; perhaps a book a lot like Philippe Rushton's "Race, Evolution and Behavior," published in 1995.

I’d like to close this broadcast with a reading from the Robert Osborn’s memorial page (http://robertosborn.org/RobertBio.htm):

Robert Osborn
1962 - 2005

Robert had a solid set of core values that were derived from a traditional family structure. He had a robust personality that was sheathed in an equally impressive six-foot, two hundred-pound frame with soft blue eyes and raffish blond hair. He and his three brothers enjoyed family vacations, camping in the outdoors and boating at Table Rock Lake.

He earned numerous medals and honors, including Eagle Scout and the "God and Life Award". He took pride in hiking twenty miles on many historic scout trails in the Midwest and was a member of Troop 421, which met at St. Bernadette's Church.

Robert was a standout performer on the water polo and swim teams. After his junior year, Robert was selected for a special two-month, scientific research program that was sponsored by the National Science Foundation. As an honor roll student, he was consistently ranked in the top ten percent of the class.

Robert earned a pilot's license and was a member of the Civil Air Patrol. After graduating from Raytown High School in 1980, he attended Purdue University. He majored in engineering, but demonstrated advanced abilities in mathematics, culminating in graduate-level coursework.

Robert made people feel special with creative gifts and cards. He would usually bring home-brewed beer, based on distinctive Belgian or German formulas, to family gatherings. He just wanted to make everyone happy.


Thanks for listening.

is the reverb/echo effect on purpose ? it sounds as if you record your broadcasts in some kind of hall.

That would be me. I have tried to add just a bit of verb to give it that lecture-hall feel. I try not to make it too prominate, just enough to enlarge it a bit. If it comes off as too much I will calibrate.

it's just that it sounds a bit weird, it's a slight distraction in my opinion.

good work Geoff

I recall reading on MajorityRights.com a story you told about planting a seed of doubt in one of your wigger nephew who was dating a mexican girl. Perhaps you should include that story in a future TIND

VLC, thanks for the comment. And yes, I set my Nephew straight on the Mestizo issue.

Today , quite by chance, I met a representative from the local school district today, and I tore into him about the Mestizo problem with the local schools. Well, after some banter he said "I think it is a class problem." I replied, "no, its a biology problem, the Mestizos are stupider and more aggressive than whites. Their genes make them that way. Whites aren't safe around them and when are you school officials going to do something about it?" Well, he didn't like that, to say the least.

BTW, do you know what I saw today? Some stupid white kid had a low rise truck with the word "wigger" written along the top edge of windshield

Last August I gave an acquaintance a copy of Kevin MacDonald's "Culture of Critique". Well, I got a Christmas card from this fellow and he thanked me for buying him that book. He said he never realized the depth of Jewish ethnocentrism and their role in radical political and social movements.

I'm deeply gratified to have helped in making someone "jew wise." I wrote him back and asked him to buy a copy to give to someone else.

BTW, this is the 4th copy of CofC that I have given away.

I mentioned at some length MacDonald's other book on the Jews, here: http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

The Truth is No Defense: 12/15/2005 #4

Listen Here To The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #4 (mp3 | 00:09:3)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls


Welcome to the Broadcast.

I don't relish being 40 years old, but age does have advantages. And I'm referring not to the general sense of wisdom which sometimes accompanies advancing age. No, it?s that I feel lucky to have witnessed a now lost American social order, if only it?s last and longest shadows.

It wasn't so long ago white children, well, like myself, were taught from books which instilled pride in young people by extolling the accomplishments of their ancestors. For example the elementary school I attended featured a workbook entitled "Our Greco-Roman Heritage," which introduced young minds to classical conceptions of architecture, law, and literature. This workbook explained ideas from the classical world manifested themselves in contemporary American society. What also facilitated the transmission of culture and knowledge to American children was the homogenous nature of the American populace. In my case the entire K-6 education was spent in the company of only White children never did a Black or Mexican set foot in my elementary school, even the Janitor was white; the same was largely true for middle school and high school.

Also, I'm grateful to have known men, like my father and grandfather, men who understood their place in history. They had a sense of dignity and inner strength which most white youth today don't possess; a possession which even I have a tenuous hold of. As the years pass I find it increasingly difficult to recall all of my father's tales, but I vividly remember him telling me of the little town near his childhood farm, in El-Dorado Springs, Missouri, which had a sign placed on its city limits which read "no blacks after sunset".

Well, I was thinking of that sign when I found myself surrounded by Mestizos and Blacks during a recent trip to Wal-Mart. Unable to find the merchandise I sought, I then located a clerk, a white boy just 21 years of age. Before asking him directions I remarked to him just how much I hate coming to Wal-Mart and I asked him how he could tolerate working here. He cautiously responded the he also hated Wal-Mart. Both of us I found out were local to the area, though 20 years apart in age.

Becoming increasingly agitated by the presence of the Blacks and Mestizos I said directly, but in a hushed tone to him, "how can you stand working around all these blacks and Mestizo?" Before he could answer I continued without pause: "you're being screwed. You know that don't you? When I grew up here there were none of these aliens in this entire county, everybody spoke English of course. And what's more there were good blue collar jobs in those days. A fellow like you could make good money painting houses, laboring, or doing construction work. Now all those jobs are gone, sent overseas by venal politicians. At the same time they imported millions of Mexicans take whatever is left, and drive down the wages. All that?s left is drudge work. It is a crime what's been done. I hope your generation makes them pay for their crimes."

There were other points I mentioned, but that was the upshot. He stood silently looking at me, but did not shrink from my words. He mentioned the horrible education he had received from the local schools, "the teachers didn't care" he said. He then confessed that he did not know that this county, much less America, had been overwhelmingly white as few as 20 years ago. We spoke some more about various points, and as I left I gave him a few web addresses to visit, like VNN's.

It seems unlikely that my friend from Wal-Mart will ever make it too a university, and besides what good would it do him. Unless he entered the science or engineering fields - increasingly dominated by non-whites - all he'd get is more anti-white propaganda. This was certainly the case when I was in college.

White male college students are easy prey for multicultural propagandists. The environment is one of total propaganda. What's worse, by that time my father had been weakened by strokes and the older men I knew, like my grandfather, were dead. A good family is a bulwark against propaganda. Anyway, the damage done to my psyche by college education was great, but somehow a seed of hope remained.

It was in an economics textbook which I noticed curious reference to slavery. It was a footnote which cited a book entitled Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393312186/qid=1134787441/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-3816746-9063328?s=books&v=glance&n=283155) by Robert William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman, a book which contradicted much that I was being told about slavery, and much that the nation was being spoon fed by such TV shows like "Roots", which had played to great acclaim years earlier. Unlike "Time on the Cross" Alex Haley's book "Roots" was a work of outright fiction. David Wolper, a Jew, produced Roots as a television miniseries. I?m told Roots is now being presented to public school children as fact. However, I?m sure that any textbook that refers to Fogel and Engerman?s work has long since been removed from school curriculum.

Anyway, I found a copy of "Time on the Cross" and discovered that that black slaves, when compared to a typical white man of that era, lived in clean well kept quarters, and were often trained to perform skilled labor; and what's more they lived longer and healthier lives than most whites; moreover far from being subject to the lash and sent to the fields to die from exhaustion slaves were treated as valuable property and cared for. In contrast poor white immigrants might be drafted into work gangs to dig drainage canals through malaria infested swamps, or work in dangerous mines. There are many other points which Fogel and Engerman discuss such as slave family formation, miscegenation, and the viability of the slave economics; findings which are offensive to multicultural sensibilities. Buy this book for your children, and read it with them.


Without children there cannot be a race, and there cannot be a race without a history of its own. Unfortunately, the history that our children are being taught is not our own. Cultural dispossession is not an accident, and we cannot sustain our race if our children are not told about Julius Ceaser, Cicero, Charlemagne, and the Magna Carta; we cannot survive if our children know only the beast Martin Luther King, but not real heroes like Jefferson Davis or Robert E. Lee.

Do what you can to plant a seed of historical consciousness in our white youth.

Thankyou for listening.

Thanks Geoff for your shows and intelligent input.

You have a great radio voice :cheers:

The Truth is No Defense: 12/15/2005 #4

Listen Here To The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #4 (mp3 | 00:09:3)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

I then located a clerk, a white boy just 21 years of age. Before asking him directions I remarked to him just how much I hate coming to Wal-Mart and I asked him how he could tolerate working here. He cautiously responded the he also hated Wal-Mart. Both of us I found out were local to the area, though 20 years apart in age.

He then confessed that he did not know that this county, much less America, had been overwhelmingly white as few as 20 years ago.

This observation cannot be underscored enough, in the Kwa. White Kwans of the younger demographic have absolutely no idea that the Kwa was once a White nation called America that functioned reasonably well, even though imperfect, still orders of magnitude more civil and pleasant than this Kwa and overwhelmingly White.

This more than anything has been the great triumph of the Jew and why some of us are doubting that the Kwa can be retaken. It could also explain why we don't really see White "youth" fanatically racialist. I was struck by an observation OSF made on TLITS, specifically that his coverage of the Minutemen and the White folk on the border resisting the mexcrement invasion were comprised mostly of the older demographic. In fact, one really old timer has a great quote in the film, something to the effect, "the hurts going to come for the next generation..." And yet that next generation was hardly represented among those White folk acting against the brown sewage.

There's very little young blood in this movement, some but very little, and that could in fact be attributed to the reality of Geoff Beck's observation of this young White man from Walmart, that the younger crowd has already been conditioned mentally to living in a Kwa, they simply don't know White life can be any better than this. That is truly a tragedy and also an indictment of White generations past, for gross negligence in securing and passing down exclusive White living space. :mad:

The Truth is No Defense: 12/22/2005 #5

Listen Here to The Truth is No Defense: 12/09/2005 #5 (mp3 | 00:9:17)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

Welcome to the Broadcast

Often knowing a phrase or word's definition is not as useful as understanding its implication, that is its connotation. Describing your girl friend's teeth as bright as a canine's fangs does convey the compliment of having white teeth, but with an unsuitable suggestion that your girlfriend is a dog.

Suppose in 1924 you were called a "white supremacist," or someone said that European civilization is "white supremacist." If such a phrase existed in 1924 it must have seem prosaic. I mean, in 1924 the entire globe, effectively, was ruled by Europe or her cousins in the United States. One could travel to India, China, and Africa never leaving white rule. This supremacy was maintained not by arms alone, but by the force of our art, manners, literature, and science; all were recognized as product of a superior civilization, white civilization.

How quickly times have changed. Looking around one can easily conclude European civilization is in free fall, with no bottom in sight. However, it is not clear if any racial rival has, in any meaningful way, eclipsed our accomplishments; we, it seems, have simply surrendered. We have simply let the inferior rule, all without a shout or shot in protest. Considering such meekness the prospects for a broad based renewal of European civilization is, I feel, unlikely. Comprehending the shattering effects of European paralysis on our lives is difficult even for the alert and thoughtful minds. Perhaps an example might illustrate? In 1924 if a black man insulted a white woman by walking too close, refusing to tip a hat, or worse flirting a beating if not an outright lynching might occur. Today, in contrast, we are witnessing the cultural and genetic destruction of our race by miscegenation. Some change huh!

And, there is another aspect of our demise that we can too easily overlook, for the savages life has never been better. For the savages each day is filled with new delights, like the open legs of our fair women and the dispossession of the white man. Our enemies are getting stronger and more confident, that is something to remember.

Julius Evola wrote much about this inversion or rule. In his book Revolt Against the Modern World he describes the death spiral we are now swept into. He describes the rush to the bottom as a "regression of castes" by that he means that as generations pass those that had once been slaves are transformed to masters; he describes an ineluctable and diabolical inversion of the natural order. This pattern will continue, Evola theorizes, until the most incompetent, foul and inferior strata of man becomes master of all those which he ought to be subject to; and it is this strata of man that will destroy civilization. The slaves become the masters until the lowest caste slaves rules all previous masters.

While some may disagree with the logic of Evola's thought any thinking White man can see the future looks grim. By whatever yardstick one implements demographics, literacy, or crime rates the trends are negative. But, you know, I'd rather deal with these facts than confront a paradigm of stagnation, a world of indecision and uncertainty: in otherwords “hey this house is on fire, I’m getting out.”

It wasn't so long that English puritans said goodbye to their world in Europe. They were convinced they had no future as a group; they left what had been their home for thousands of years. Think of it, so strong was their desire to separate from the old world that they risked a 3 month journey across the Atlantic in leaky wind driven wooden ships. Even if it meant drowning at sea or starvation in the new world they, by God, wanted out. They came to America - not as immigrants - but as settlers and world creators.

Well, by God, I want out of this system, and I expect many listening now also want out. At some point I think we need to make the leap from a community united by an electronic forum to one united by physical space. We need to live near each other, a place where our language, folkways, art, and genetics can be preserved. These communities would also be citadels in times of distress.

We have many examples of a faction hiving off from the main body and declaring Independence. Though the American South ultimately failed in 1865, others have succeeded. In 1949, when it became apparent the Nationalist Chinese would lose in their civil war against the communists many fled to Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan, there they built a new China. They took with them all the treasures of their homeland which they could carry: silks, paintings, books, ceramics, entire museums were emptied and transported to their new homes on the fringes of Chinese territory. They took these sacred objects to preserve them from desecration and for the benefit of their future descendents. Today, in our land, the desecrators are in charge and they are destroying everything our ancestors built for us. Our inferior rulers are even destroying the greatest artifact of a people, its genetics.

Look, what I'm saying is we need to build our own communities. Places where Aryan ethnic networks can be formed, children inculcated with Aryan values, and taught our Aryan language and customs. In 1924 we we're able to shape the entire world as we saw fit. We can’t know think about ruling the world, but we can perfect a new unity and understanding among our people. We can plot a new course for our people and our descendents. It will take imagination, sacrifice, and much above all leadership, but it must be done.

Thanks for listening.

Next Sunday night, New Years Eve, at 7 PM EST I'll be on VNN Radio live. The Truth is No Defense (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm) is going live, after Peter Schaenk (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/psworldwide.htm) and just before Celtic Rage.

Listen in at: http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

I think Celtic Rage (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/celragemain.htm) is also broadcasting on New Years, if so I might just stay on through midnight.

Be sure to join call in, at 609-910-1418 / Skype user name: SSKIIT

Broadcasting LIVE deep in the belly of the ‘kwa’ this is “The Truth Is No Defense”.

I'm your host Geoff Beck. After the monologue finishes I welcome you to join the show by calling 609-910-1418 / the Skype user name to call is: SSKIIT

The Truth is No Defense: 1/1/2006 #6

Listen Here to The Truth is No Defense:
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

When you hear the word democracy uttered on the radio or TV, you might want to mentally substitute the world plutocracy. Let’s give it a try, shall we? When Bush says the insurgents fear “the rise of a democratic Iraq” or when he says that “America, is working for a democratic Iraq” doesn’t it make more sense if it read “America, is working for a plutocratic Iraq” or the insurgents fear “the rise of a plutocratic Iraq.” Not to pick on Bush alone, if you live overseas try it for Blair in England, Martin in Canada, or Howard in Australia.

Until quite recently most learned men thought democracy was a dangerous form of government, one which inevitably transitioned into plutocracy and tyranny. Over a span of 2500 years, from the 5th century BC Greeks to the German Idealists of the early 20th century, most thought the best form of government was one which an aristocratic elite – a superior element among the people, the clan, or the gens (which is the Latin work for family or nation united by blood. We form the word gentlemen from this word) would rise and govern: most often this meant a Monarch, a priestly order, or a council of warriors.

Dr. Jacob Alexander has surveyed the past 2500 years of western political thought in his book "Nobilitas: A Study of European Aristocratic Philosophy from Ancient Greece to the Early Twentieth Century (http://www.univpress.com/Catalog/SingleBook.shtml?command=Search&db=^DB/CATALOG.db&eqSKUdata=0761818871)" and despite the years there is a surprising uniformity among the thinkers surveyed: democracy and its twin egalitarianism are a curse.

This was the opinion of Plato, Aristotle, Bodin, Burke, Fichte, De Maistre, Schopenhauer, Hegel, and Spengler. Democracy, they said, elevates the inferior; destroys the spiritual life; it transfers power to the unfit; and it inevitably degrades into mob rule, plutocracy, and tyranny. The fruit, as Heinrich von Trietschke (1834-96) warned, of democracy would be that of “a disproportionate share of influence given to stupidity, superstition, malice, mendacity… and nebulous waves of sentiment would introduce an unpredictable element into the life of the State.”

Do you may recall the second inaugural address delivered by George Bush? It was widely reported Mr. Bush, the night before his address, was up late reading a book by the Israeli Jew, Natan Sharansky entitled "The Case For Democracy: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror". Sharansky's book claims democracies are inherently peaceful and the entire world ought to be made ready for world wide democratic revolution. Sharansky describes democracies as guarantors of freedom and liberty, and non-democratic states as "fear societies". Prattle such as this is easily countered, but for the inferior who hold power – if only ceremonially - it generates much excitement, like the anticipated arrival of Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy.

Bush, it was reported, was so enamored by Sharanksy's second rate thought he called for all Americans to purchase the book. We can only guess how much this book has influenced foreign policy; it surely influenced the president's inaugural address of January 20th.


[Clip from Inaugeral Address]

Such, rhetoric, aside from being stupid is also dangerous. But Bush is only the worst, in a long string of idiots, knaves, lechers and half-wits voted into office. In so far as any creature of our kind holds power they are an inferior type, like the devious lecher like Bill Clinton or a fool like George Bush. Before the voting rights act of 1964 – which gave non-whites the right to vote – the American public was a bit more selective about those it allowed into office. The degradation of the masses is so complete that even if a President is exposed as a lecher or a liar the public re-elects the scoundrel.

Ask yourself, why are Jews like the right wing Isreali Sharansky so insistent that all governments be democracies? I’ll to you why, because nations that are mass democracies are easily subverted and manipulated, they are like cattle being intentionally stampeded to edge of a cliff: the hands spooking the cattle, that are blowing the horns, banging the pots and pans, and firing into the air are the Jews using their predominance in the media. For the sake of malice alone the Jew cattle drivers have the herd trample our neighborhoods, churches, and just about any other institution that might serve to strengthen our people. Can any democratically elected politician stand up to the Jews, question their motives, or examination the question of Jewish predominance in the media, banking, or law schools? No! In fact to show how cowed our elected leadership is on December 16th of 2005 the House of Representatives voted unanimously 432-0 to make January Jewish history month. The bill had 252 co-sponsors in congress. Folks, voting got us into this mess, voting will not get us out. The Jews have a lock on our electoral system.

Let’s get a perspective on the rise of mass democracy. Before the twentieth century democracy in Europe was mitigated, in some states by royal veto, by custom, and to some extent by religious tradition; in America women and blacks were not allowed voting privileges. Before the 20th century, especially for example, in the 19th century, in both America and Europe, life was characterized by large families, low crime, sound money, personal freedom, and order - but voting privileges were restricted. These restrictions on voting rights tempered the turbulence of the masses; it kept the demagogic element in democratic politics muted. When voting reform bills in the early 20th century in Europe and United States extended voting rights to women, the young, alien races and criminals the brakes on mob rule where removed. And it does not take tyrant long to find a mob, a tyrant to mold to the mob to his purposes: a tyrant to provide welfare benefits, a tyrant to grant special privileges, a tyrant to exploit friction among men and women the old and the young.

It is worth noting too the rise of a full blown mass democracy - just like full blown AIDS – has been accompanied by many horrors like WWI and II. But isn't that what inferior people do when they rule, destroy and not create? Just as AIDS weakens and kills those it infects, democracy weakens and kills the political and spiritual life of the nation.

Many, in a quite facile way, hail Athens as a beacon of early democracy; though citizenship and voting rights in Athens were restricted to a precious few. I would certainly favor that system over the madness of one-body-one-vote system we have today. But even such restrictions did not, in the long run, prevent Athens from losing the war and degrading into an authoritarian state. Those that have read Thucydides’ “The Peloponnesian War” know that democratic Athens, essentially, voted its own destruction through an imperial war against its neighbors. Readers also know that Democratic Athens was defeated largely because she suffered from irrational and intemperate rule. If you’ve read Thucydides’ history you might remember the debate about the fate of the Mytilenians? So enraged were the Athenians over the Mytilenian revolt that the Athenian Assembly voted to put to death all Mytilenian prisoners and to exterminate the entire male population of Mytilene. To accomplish the genocide a fleet was dispatched. Soon afterwards a second debate commenced, the mood of the democratic mob changed, and after a close vote the assembly voted to reverse the genocide verdict and dispatch another ship to catch the fleet sent earlier to slaughter the Mytilenians. Remember too that the Mytilenians were Hellenes just like the Athenians, fellow Greeks, brothers, and not the hated and alien Persians which repeatedly had tried to enslave the Greeks and deprive them of their ancient liberties.

I think it important to clarify something, a point those in an earlier time might not have needed clarified. When speaking of rule by superior I mean not rule the by the snobbish, lazy, or spoiled. I mean not rule by plutocrats, technocrats, or the businessmen. I mean rule by those whose lineages over the decades and centuries have proved worthy of power. I mean rule by those who have demonstrated loyalty over generations. I mean rule by those that have led men into battle and withstood the fire. What I certainly don't mean is a type of man like the system politician, which lies and prevaricates which appeases and placates, which massages the masses for votes while enriching themselves and their friends - or those taking directives from foreign powers, powers like Mr. Sharansky and his fellow Jews. Also, I am not suggesting the weak or dull of our race are ever to be relegated to the political status of blacks, Mexicans or Jews.

In the past, rule by the superior meant the group of distinguished families called the nobility. Many nobles took pride in knowing their families had ruled for generations, tracing their roots to 8th century and perhaps even to the days of the Roman senate. Today, some noble families have retained there ancient titles but wield no power, and others are now wedded to inferior bloodlines. Some noble houses were slaughtered wholesale by the communists, like the Romanov dynasty at the hands of Jewish terrorists.

Now, lest again, I am misunderstood, I am not in favor or restoring the noble houses of Europe, though there may indeed be a few worthy families still in existence – most are thoroughly corrupt, and have been so for decades. No, what I favor is the formation of new elite, the formation of new noble lineages. This is not something that can’t be done by snapping one's fingers, establishing a commission, or by the vote. Only the merciless scythe known as time can separate the mediocre from the exceptional, this process is one of struggle, it is one of natural selection

When I speak of rule by the superior I know some won't like that. Yes, you may understand the inferiority of blacks and Mestizos, but acknowledging differences among our own kind is too painful or you may think it disruptive or divisive. Recall though, when whites had large families, of say 6 or 7 kids, perhaps only one child would rise above the rest to find success in business or academia. We must find those exceptions, those noble few in our race, or family if you will and nurture them. It absolutely necessary we promulgate and identify the superior of our race, or family.

For this mechanism to work we must come together, build communities, villages, cities, and neighborhoods. It took centuries for Europe to incubate their nobility, so this task is a delicate one. But only by careful selection in a healthy habitat can we identify the superior. In our own space we can educate, fund and encourage the propagation of new nobility, for this we need our own living space.

Today, we live in a system with promulgates the degenerate and inferior, especially in politics and the arts. A system which favors the hypnotic beat of the jungle over polyphony, a system which exalts the Negro beast before the gentleman. A system with exalts money and the "here and now", before discipline, duty, and sacrifice. In such a system we cannot survive, we will simply be out competed, genetically eliminated. For in the race to the bottom the degenerate and inferior win.

The Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393310957/qid=1136164137/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-0003866-1862324?s=books&v=glance&n=283155)wrote a provocative book discussing the rise of mass societies in Europe and America entitled “Revolt of the Masses.” (1932). If you are interested in this topic of mass man, mass democracy and nobility I recommend the book. In Revolt of the Masses the philosopher used a quote from the Roman poet Horace to describe the loss of vitality, the decline in standards and morals in the twentieth century, a decline which seemed to manifest itself in the very breeding of the race. Horace, though, was writing in the 1st century, during the rise of the Caesars and the decline of the Roman Republic, he wrote:

"Our fathers, viler than our grandfathers, begot us who are more degenerate still, and we shall bear a progeny more degenerate."

Consider that when you see a little black baby call out “mamma” to a white woman.

Good show Geoff! Sorry I didn't call in, I have a hangover and I don't think I would have been a good caller.

I linked it in the history channel though so I'm sure new listeners heard you fine :cheers:

What a great show, Geoff. I listened to it all. It's already been said before, but your teaching method of causing volk to reach their own logical conclusions based on your step by step analysis, and your cadence is so much like Dr. Pierce's.

I am glad Goyfire seemingly caused you to take some type of step from trying to convince conservatives to coming full on to our side. Thanks to Alex and Agis!

As Subrosa almost did, I too almost called in...except I was fascinated and mesmerized by your teaching dialogue. You're going to make many a teaching podcast-- it'll be a big, big prob for The Kwa's rabbis.

You're even better live than memorexed. I'm glad.

Thanks Jeff for that recommendaton of Ortega Y Gasset. I've wondered what book of his to start with and that sounds great.

Listen Here to The Truth is No Defense
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

Welcome to the broadcast… very happy to be with the folks at VNN tonight.

Tonight I’d like to talk about the Germans and their role in our history, and I think it necessary to mention that although my surname is German, I am not a full blooded German. I’m proud to be a full blooded Aryan though, but my blood is more Scots-Irish than German. My world view though is pan-Aryan, and is based in the European experience in America, and in that regard I’m not much of a chauvinist among European nationalities. I’ll also be discussing Christianity tonight, and, in contrast, I’ll let the listener decide what exactly I think about that subject.

The twentieth century, as we know, was a particularly dreadful time for our race, and what emerged after WWI and WWII was unlike what preceded it. What happened to our nations was nothing short of apocalyptic; many cities in continental Europe lay in rubble and entombed in that rubble were millions of our kin. Even those nations not bombed would soon undergo a cultural revolution as destructive as anything unleashed by a bombing run. Those slaughtered, the Americans, English, French, Russians, Italians, and Germans were often the fittest of our breed. And please keep in mind when I say Americans, English, French, Russians, Italians, and Germans I'm talking our flesh and blood, often our best flesh and blood. War is dysgenic; it sacrifices the bravest, most fearless, and courageous of our kind.

Official history tells us the Germans caused both wars and lost them both, but the real loser was our race. Among the parties involved in these fratricidal conflicts of the twentieth century it is the Germans, in particular, that I wish to talk about tonight. The Germans are - or were - no ordinary people; they are among our race’s finest specimens. Even today the average IQ in Germany is 102, among the highest in Europe. In contrast the United States' average IQ is 98 and, I suspect, that number is dropping quickly.

Links: Battle of Teutoberg Forest
http://www.kalkriese-varusschlacht.de/englisch/start_eng.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Teutoburg_Forest


The German tribes that emerged from the hyperborean regions of antiquity met, and held, the Romans legions at the Rhine. In AD 9 the Romans sent 3 legions into German lands. Deep in the Teutoburg forest the Romans and the Germans met. The legions led by Varus and the Germans by Hermanius. The Germans slaughtered the Romans to a man. The battle of Teutoburg forest is an interesting tale, yet the point is the Germans were, even before encountering the Romans, an intelligent race capable of defeating the Romans on the field of battle. Even the Greeks with their formidable hoplites and the Egyptians with their navy fell before Romans, not so the Germans. Julius Evola saw the Germans not so much as warriors but as the bearers of a new culture, one that would reinvigorate the decaying Roman Empire - the 'light of the north.' Evola and others argued it was the Germans that remade Christianity making it meaningful to the Aryan culture of Europe.

As the Roman Empire in the West decayed, the Germans filled the empire staffing its armies and rising to rule. They brought to the old empire a renewed sense of duty, honor, and youth; importantly they remade Judaic Christianity - which had spread like cancer in the decaying empire. I'll speak more about Evola's views on German culture and their impact on Christianity and decaying Roman Empire later in the broadcast. Anyway, the destruction of Germany in 1945 weighs most heavily upon us, for they, as Pierce said, were among the best of our people.

In 2003 the sociologist Charles Murray, a coauthor of the Bell Curve, published Human Accomplishment (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060929642/qid=1136773942/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-5159418-4258322?s=books&v=glance&n=283155) which surveyed recorded history from 800 BC – 1950 AD. The purpose for writing Human Accomplishment was to identify those precious few individuals responsible for creating the greatest works of art, literature and significant scientific discoveries. Like the Bell Curve, Human Accomplishment was subject to great criticism from the priests of political correctness, and for that reason alone it deserves to be read. Using a rigorous and consistent methodology Murray confirms what Pierce declared, the Germans are indeed among the very best of our kind.

Map of Holy Roman Empire
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Western_empire_verdun_843.png

One section, on pages 301-303, of Human Accomplishment features outline maps of Europe onto which blue dots are affixed. Each blue dot represents an individual responsible for a significant accomplishment(s) in the arts or sciences. Readers will note Germany is filled with blue dots, as is Northern Italy and Southern England; America has few dots, China and India less, and Latin America and Africa almost nothing. Some will recognize this area of Europe filled with blue dots - with the exception of England - as borders of the Holy Roman Empire (843-1806). For purposes of later in the broadcast I wish to now note the boundaries of the Holy Roman Empire extend beyond the Rhine into the German heartland, that large chunk of middle Europe which the Romans never conquered, a place in Europe where the “roman sword” – as some say - never cut.

Understanding the Holy Roman Empire requires knowledge of geography and history few Europeans, much less Americans, possess. But suffice it to say the empire was incubator of European culture and nobility. The empire founded by Charlemagne (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne) (747-814) was the empire of the German princes, the empire of ancient European nobility, the home of the Hapsburgs, the Saxon, and Hohenstaufen houses. I list these names of Franco-Germanic aristocratic families to demonstrate their pedigree is quite old and the Germans a noble race. Tacitus (56-117), a Roman Historian, perhaps the first Chronicler of the Germans, regarded the tribes and the rulers

of Germany as free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves.

On leadership he said,

They choose their kings by birth, their generals for merit. These kings have not unlimited or arbitrary power, and the generals do more by example than by authority. If they are energetic, if they are conspicuous, if they fight in the front, they lead because they are admired. But to reprimand, to imprison, even to flog, is permitted to the priests alone, and that not as a punishment, or at the general's bidding, but, as it were, by the mandate of the god whom they believe to inspire the warrior.

Tacitus’s description of the Germans is not one of a group needing “Roman civilization” of any kind, much less “Christian civilization.”

It has been asserted by some that Christianized Romans brought "civilization" to the Germans via the “Roman sword.” Well, as we have seen the Romans made little progress in military actions against the Germans. Anyway, the story goes like this: the “'Roman sword' and the Christian message civilized the barbarian German tribes”. I disagree with this theory.

The Roman Empire is not to be confused with the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was compromised of Italian tribes like the Romans, Volsci, Aequi and others. The Republic was a tribal thing, it was not Christian it had no explicit ideology of universalism, though it was flexible and offered the conquered some autonomy. Remember that it was the Roman Republic that produced political thinkers and philosophers such as Cicero and Cato, while the Empire produced lechers and the dissolute like Nero and Caligula. It was the Republic that developed a complex political system with divided government, while it was the empire that was a centralized autocratic institution ruling in a manner of oriental despotism. The empire, which was consolidated by Augustus in the first century, metastasized into a polyglot multicultural cesspool, much the America today, with pretensions of world rule. Perhaps we can make an analogy to the old American Republic and the empire we now live under. Where the American Republic created statesmen like Jefferson Davis and John C. Calhoun in contrast the American Empire has produced us George Bush and Bill Clinton. Where the American Republic produced poets like Edgar Allen Poe the American Empire offers Maya Angelou instead.

The Romans – both Empire and Republic - conquered much of Western Europe but also Asia Minor, Egypt, North Africa, and for a time Mesopotamia; these “conquered” alien cultures returned the favor, exporting back to Rome their oriental religions. Cosmopolitan dissolution overtook Rome and destroyed the heritage and customs of the Italian tribes. Christianity was only one of the many cults to come to Rome.

After the rise of the empire both the quality and quantity of literature and art declined, and, in course, the politics became centralized and despotic. The discipline of the Roman army also declined, as was demonstrated in the crushing defeats at Adrianople (378) and Chalons (451). The observances of ancient customs were neglected. Soon, bizarre cults replaced Italian beliefs, one of which was the Judaic sect called Christianity. But how could Judaic system take root in Europe?

Now we return to Evola. When we look at European history and culture we don't see the ethics of Judaism, instead we see the culture of chivalry, honor, fealty, sacrifice, and a not a culture of petty money grubbing and narrow ethnocentrism typifying Judaism. This chivalric spirit came from the Northern-Aryan culture that lay for centuries to the north of Rome – just beyond its reach.

[Read from P. 298 and 299 of Evola's RATMW (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/089281506X/qid=1136774082/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-5159418-4258322?s=books&v=glance&n=283155)]

When we strip the layers of Aryan customs, art, and spiritual inspiration that the Germans – and other European tribes – layered onto Christianity nothing but a provincial Levantine cult remains. When you think of Christian civilization think of the Grail story, Tristan and Isolde, the Song of Roland, Albrecht Durer, Holdbein, Bach, Handel, Stain Glassed Windows, Feudal Law, Gothic Churches, this is Christianity, this is what are ancestors fought for and not some indecipherable Jewish scribbling. When we strip out the Aryan covering on Christianity all that is left is the sterile nub of Christian Zionism, or Judeo-Christianity. Reduced Christianity is lifeless, harsh, unimaginative, uncreative, narrow, and inflexible. It is not a vessel of culture, but the acid of anti-culture.

Let’s look at the accomplishments of Christianity in the last 60 years. Have we witnessed the construction of any magnificent churches? Most churches today look like strip malls or Wal-Marts. What about other art? A few years ago I visited a few local protestant churches and do you know what I heard? I heard not the music of Handel, Bach or Beethoven but the beat of drums and the rhythms of Africa. The churches have disposed of the Aryan for the African. Ok, but what about Christian influence in politics? Christians, in too many circumstances, have merely become lap dogs for the state of Israel. Sure, they also fight a rear-guard battle against Homosexuality while, ironically, voting for a party whose leadership is packed with queers.

Most churches whether Catholic or Protestant are enthusiastic promoters of third world immigration. This Christian betrayal of Whites has been going on for some time; many of Rhodesia’s Christians weakened the resolve of whites in that nation, now named Zimbabwe; the Christian churches of South Africa also fell in line and passively allowed the black takeover of South Africa; and now the American Churches are working to weaken America by encouraging miscengation and mass immigration.

I think somewhere under that rubble of bombed out Germany is or was the answer to our crises of faith. Germany I suspect had the seed of regeneration, perhaps a revivified form of Christianity, perhaps something new.

Interesting reading. I've not yet been able to listen to the show, but would like to say something about the text.

The Roman Republic was not a philosophical one. It took the established reign of the Caesars to make it more 'Greek', that is to give the new rich and old aristocracy a new philosophical peg to hang their hats on (which Juvenal complains about bitterly), til we find Marcus fighting to maintain the empire while writing his meditations in Greek.

As for the superiority of the Germans and significant acomplishments, excepting the stand out Gauss, for our maths we are heavily indebted to the French: Fermat, Poincare, Descarte, Galois. I am just trying to point out that all European peoples once had something to give, quite often having a national particularity.

As for honour and money grubbing, we must remember the Knights Templar, the first bankers of Europe whose rising tide of money wealth was eventually cut off by the French king. Of course the Templars had picked up some strange ideas from their time in Middle East.

Mention of the Grail is made and the story of the grail has parallels with the idea of the dwelling place of the presence of god, the chalice being a feminine symbol and related to the jewish idea of the feminine Shekinah. This again could be from the meeting of cultures in the middle east at that time.

As for the rubble of the bombed out Germany, we know that the NSADP dismissed the "Decline" of Spengler as pessimistic:

A. Hitler, MAY 1, 1935 in Berlin

A writer has summed up the impressions made on him by this time in a book which he entitled 'The Decline of the West.' Is it then really to be the end of our history and of our peoples? No! we cannot believe it. This age must be called, not the decline of the West, but the resurrection of the peoples of this West of ours! Only that which was old, decayed and evil perishes; and let it die! But new life will spring up. Faith can be found, if the will is there. Our leadership has the will, and faith is with the people.

So we have come together on this day to prove symbolically that we are more than a collection of individuals striving one against another, that none of us is too proud, none of us too high, none is too rich, and none too poor, to stand together before the face of the Lord and of the world in this indissoluble, sworn community. And this united nation, we have need of it. When was a leadership at any time faced with a heavier task than our German leadership? Consider, my comrades, what our Germany is, and compare it with other countries. What have we? One hundred and thirty-seven people to the square kilometer; no colonies; no raw materials; no foreign exchange, no capital, no longer any foreign credits; only heavy burdens, sacrifices, taxation, and low wages. What have we, compared with the wealth of other States, the wealth of other countries, the wealth of other peoples, with the possibilities of living that they possess? What have we? One thing only; we have our people. Either it is everything or it is nothing. On it alone can we count. On it alone can we build. Everything that we have created up to the present we owe solely to its goodness of heart, its capacity, its loyalty, its decency, its industry, its sense of order. And if I weigh all this in the balance, it seems to me to be more than all that the rest of the world can offer us. So this, I believe, can be our message to the other peoples on this first of May: 'You need have no fear that we want anything of you. We are proud enough to confess that we ourselves own that treasure, which you certainly could not give us - our people.' I could, as leader, think of no more glorious, no prouder task in this world than to serve this people. One might give me continents, but I would rather be the poorest citizen among this people. And with this people we must and shall succeed in achieving also the tasks that are still to come.

What we want lies clear before us: not war and not strife. Just as we have established peace within our own people, so we want nothing else than peace with the world. For we all know that our great work can succeed only in a time of peace. But just as the leadership of the nation in the domestic sphere has never sacrificed its honor in its relations with the German people, so it can never surrender the honor of the German people in its dealings with the world.

We know what we owe to the world. May the world come to understand what she can never deny to a proud people, and above all may she comprehend one thing: the Germany of today is not the Germany of yesterday - just as little as the Germany of yesterday was the Germany of today. The German people of the present time is not the German people of the day before yesterday, but the German people of the two thousand years of German history which lie behind us.


further...

22 January 1938 Address to Senior Officers

Rome had risen to greatness through strong leadership. The old world was conquered by new nations from the East, seeking living space in the West. However, Christianity provided a basis which prevented the onset of complete chaos and which bound people together. This was the basis of the Holy Roman Empire. It was a sign of great narrow-mindedness in this connection to refer to Charlemagne as the Slaughterer of the Saxons.

He was compelled to strike down the opposition because of his policy of Christianity. It simply remained a pity that the best German blood was lost.

In the modern age, millions saw nothing in Christianity. This was the fault of the form, not the content. Old forms had to go and be replaced by the new.


but we need to turn to the speech of Adolf Hitler in Nuremberg, 6th Sep, 1938 and keeping in mind Spengler's "Decline" to see just what Hitler was striving for...

THE proof of the endowment of a true artist is always to be found in the fact that his work of art expresses the general will of a period. Perhaps that is most clearly shown in architecture.... The religious mystical world of the Christian Middle Ages, turning inwards upon itself, found forms of expression which were possible only for that world - for that world alone could they be of service. A Gothic stadium is as unthinkable as a Romanesque railway station or a Byzantine market hall. The way in which the artist of the Middle Ages, of the beginnings of the modern world, found the artistic solution for the buildings which he was commissioned to create is in the highest degree striking and admirable. That way, however, is no evidence that the conception of the content of life held by the folk of his day was in itself either absolutely right or absolutely wrong; it is evidence only that works of art have rightly mirrored the inner mind of a past age. It is therefore quite comprehensible that insofar as the attempt is made to carry on the life of that past age, those who search for solutions of artistic problems can still seek and find there fruitful suggestions. Thus one can easily imagine that, for instance, in the sphere of religion men will always work backwards to the form-language of a period in which Christianity in its view of the world appeared to meet every need. On the other hand, at the present moment the expression of a new view of the world which is determined by the conception of race will return to those ages which in the past have already possessed a similar freedom of the spirit, of the will, and of the mind. Thus, naturally, the manifestation in art of a European conception of the State will not be possible through civilizations, as, for example, the civilization of the Far East, which - because foreign to us - have no message for our day, but will rather be influenced in a thousand ways through the evidences and memories of that mighty imperial Power of antiquity which, although in fact destroyed fifteen hundred years ago, still as an ideal force lives on and works on in the imaginations of men. The more nearly the modern State approaches to the imperial idea of the ancient World-Power, so more and more will the general character of that civilization be manifested in its influence upon the formation of the style of our own day.

National Socialism is not a cult-movement - a movement for worship; it is exclusively a 'volkic' political doctrine based upon racial principles. In its purpose there is no mystic cult, only the care and leadership of a people defined by a common blood-relationship. Therefore we have no rooms for worship, but only halls for the people - no open spaces for worship, but spaces for assemblies and parades. We have no religious retreats, but arenas for sports and playing-fields, and the characteristic feature of our places of assembly is not the mystical gloom of a cathedral, but the brightness and light of a room or hall which combines beauty with fitness for its purpose. In these halls no acts of worship are celebrated, they are exclusively devoted to gatherings of the people of the kind which we have come to know in the course of our long struggle; to such gatherings we have become accustomed and we wish to maintain them. We will not allow mystically-minded occult folk with a passion for exploring the secrets of the world beyond to steal into our Movement. Such folk are not National Socialists, but something else - in any case, something which has nothing to do with us. At the head of our program there stand no secret surmisings but clear-cut perception and straightforward profession of belief. But since we set as the central point of this perception and of this profession of belief the maintenance and hence the security for the future of a being formed by God, we thus serve the maintenance of a divine work and fulfill a divine will - not in the secret twilight of a new house of worship, but openly before the face of the Lord.

There were times when a half-light was the necessary condition for the effectiveness of certain teachings: we live in an age when light is for us the fundamental condition of successful action. It will be a sorry day when through the stealing in of obscure mystic elements the Movement or the State itself issues obscure commissions.... It is even dangerous to issue any commission for a so-called place of worship, for with the building will arise the necessity for thinking out so-called religious recreations or religious rites, which have nothing to do with National Socialism. Our worship is exclusively the cultivation of the natural, and for that reason, because natural, therefore God-willed. Our humility is the unconditional submission before the divine laws of existence so far as they are known to us men: it is to these we pay our respect. Our commandment is the courageous fulfillment of the duties arising from those laws. But for religious rites we are not the authorities, but the churches! If anyone should believe that these tasks of ours are not enough for him, that they do not correspond with his convictions, then it is for him to prove that God desires to use him to change things for the better. In no event can National Socialism or the National Socialist State give to German art other tasks than those which accord with our view of the world.

It was to move out of the Faustian and the gothic gloom of the cathedrals and let Christianity fully flower in the light of day, as a positive motivating force rather than the whip of the flagellant, as world affirming rather than world denying. Christianity was/is moving in that direction but it was/is possible for it to become perverted and distasteful under the judaic rule, affirming the destructive elements in the world and not the creative.

Anyway, that is my .02 on some of the content. Very thought provoking essay. Keep up the good work.

Thankyou for your comments, enjoyed your perspective.

Dont know if its just a one off bad download this end but the copy I have has a corrupted file header and crashes windoze media player....

Re-sampled it in CEP and it played fine.. :confused:

14/88

I downloaded the full mp3 (not the stream) this morning and, oddly, I had to restart the mp3 about 10 minutes into the broadcast. Don't know if accidently hit the mouse, or what?

Don't know if anyone else had that problem?

Excellent Show Geoff. Don't be hesitant in your criticism of a Jewish originated religion, that for the most part, has been a destructive force to the existence of our people as a separate, unique race and culture. These discussions are important but they should be kept within WN circles and not used for recruiting unless we're targeting Atheists and Pagans. I really love Peter Shank but my God, please stop telling me how Christianity (a middle eastern religion) united the White race, how it's the basis of Western Civilization and that it's an effective tool to use against the Jew - because Jesus, even though he was a Jew, was somehow an anti-Semite because he spoke out against a few Jews (Pharisies) in leadership positions. We need to get the **** away from this suicidal religion, if White people want to worship a Jewish God, they should have the absolute freedom to do so, but as modern Christianity stands today I want no part of it!

Lets look at what Christianity supports today:

- Love your enemy
- Turn the Cheek
- Worship the jew as the chosen one
- Convert the non White
- Give charity to the non White (if Christian)
- Marry the non White (if Christian)
- Miseginate with the non White (if Christian)
- Support and defend immigration from the third world (if Christian).......

Mr. StormfrontRiggs:

"Support and defend immigration from the third world (if Christian)......."

From what I can tell most Christian churches don't care if immigrants are even Christian. So, deluded are they, so captivated they are by the Jew agenda. Remember discrimination is bad, sinful.

. We need to get the **** away from this suicidal religion,

A dirty little secret of the Christian Religion is the vast number of suicides that it has caused. The endless psychological manipulation of "guilt,sin,guilt,sin" has cost a terrible toll. We have probably lost the best of our race to that ! The
kindest, most caring and most sensitive of our people have taken their own lives, thanks to a doctrine of manipulation by guilt and promise.

A dirty little secret of the Christian Religion is the vast number of suicides that it has caused. The endless psychological manipulation of "guilt,sin,guilt,sin" has cost a terrible toll. We have probably lost the best of our race to that ! The
kindest, most caring and most sensitive of our people have taken their own lives, thanks to a doctrine of manipulation by guilt and promise.


Indeed, "Our mental institutions are literally over flowing with Jesus freaks, don't be one of them"

-Ethnic Cleansing-

because Jesus, even though he was a Jew, was somehow an anti-Semite because he spoke out against a few Jews (Pharisies) in leadership positions. We need to get the **** away from this suicidal religion, if White people want to worship a Jewish God, they should have the absolute freedom to do so, but as modern Christianity stands today I want no part of it!



Jesus was no more Jewish than my cat and i'm sick of goddam Judeo_Christian lies sowing dischord and promulgating bullshit hiding behind Celtic, Nordic, Nazi psudonyms. Ikke vet jeg hvorfor dem skulle være anonym da. Er du Judisk kansje??. Det tro jeg.

If by any vague chance you would stand to benefit from a process of education in this matter I recommend the works of Dr Bertrand Comparet
or Dr Wesley Swift which will leave you under no illusion regarding the Judeo_Christian oxymoron you so tacitly chose to adhere to and employ as a means of attempting to making anyone who does not ascribe to your insane view look stupid. In typical jewish fashion I may add. Jesus was not a Jew, he did not in any way shape or form represent Judaism, Phariseism or any Talmudic rite or fervour. Au Contraire.. The Jews worship NO GOD.

Very good shows. Very rich content. I may CD some to a reluctant relative or two because the voice is intelligent, knowledgeable, confident... the antithesis of the Hollywood biker-racist-hater. It will be tough for The Tribe to deal with you and any others like you now coming on line.

I'm a techie. So, I want to mention that, from what I have heard, the technical part of your show is very good. Audio level and quality, low background noise and echo. Pro quality. Also, the phone patch audio seems as good as it could be. By contrast, some of the other shows need a little work and discipline in the nuts and bolts department.

Keep it up

Jesus was no more Jewish than my cat and i'm sick of goddam Judeo_Christian lies sowing dischord and promulgating bullshit hiding behind Celtic, Nordic, Nazi psudonyms. Ikke vet jeg hvorfor dem skulle være anonym da. Er du Judisk kansje??. Det tro jeg.

If by any vague chance you would stand to benefit from a process of education in this matter I recommend the works of Dr Bertrand Comparet
or Dr Wesley Swift which will leave you under no illusion regarding the Judeo_Christian oxymoron you so tacitly chose to adhere to and employ as a means of attempting to making anyone who does not ascribe to your insane view look stupid. In typical jewish fashion I may add. Jesus was not a Jew, he did not in any way shape or form represent Judaism, Phariseism or any Talmudic rite or fervour. Au Contraire.. The Jews worship NO GOD.


Jesus was not a Jew? :confused: What was he a Viking?

By the way I think my views are well thought out and not in the least bit insane.

Jesus was not a Jew? :confused: What was he a Viking?

By the way I think my views are well thought out and not in the least bit insane.

Hey, Riggs, when the time comes, the wacky xtian folk like Owain G will have to be "re-educated" in special camps.

Mr. StormfrontRiggs:

"Support and defend immigration from the third world (if Christian)......."

From what I can tell most Christian churches don't care if immigrants are even Christian. So, deluded are they, so captivated they are by the Jew agenda. Remember discrimination is bad, sinful.


Excellent shows Geoff! I look forward to each one!

The Truth is No Defense: 1/13/2006 #8

Television and books; The Media Jews and Winston Churchill.


Listen Here to The Truth is No Defense
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls


Race mixing, gratuitous violence, lewd and low brow comedy comprise so much of television broadcasting that three years ago I quit watching television. I think it likely that my utter disgust with television led directly my racial awareness. I suppose all the time spent watching television crowded out the space my brain needed to think. Now, of course, there are many more reasons why I don’t watch television. The initial reason for quitting television was disgust. Now of course I have so many more reasons to hate television: like knowing television programming is written, directed, scripted, and often performed by Jews, and even publications the review television broadcasting are often owned or controlled by Jews. Having the Jews script our news and entertainment, in other words, inform us about our world and nation is the primary reason, I think, for our cultural disintegration.

Often when speaking to racially conscious whites I mention that I don’t watch TV, and most agree with my feelings of disgust, yet I’m amazed at how few have unplugged their TV sets. Many tell me they don’t watch garbage TV, but instead watch the “good shows” on serious outlets the Discovery Channel, PBS, the Weather Channel. Others tell me they to watch TV, even garbage TV, to keep an eye on the Jew.

For those that want to keep “an eye on the Jew” I say your stomach must be strong and your mental power immense. I really don’t think I could hold up. Say what you might, but I don’t have the mental power to resist the embedded propaganda which is tailored for each viewing demographic. You see, you’re probably like me, you don’t like to watch garbage TV, you don’t like to watch Bill Cosby, you don’t like to watch the ‘Fresh Prince’ and you don’t like to watch ‘Jorge’ the Mexican. For you, garbage TV is such an outrage to your sense of morality and your racial identity that it simply can’t be stomached. The embedded propaganda – for that demographic - simply can’t operate on your psyche. But I ask you, do the blacks, Mestizos and dimwitted whites that watch, Cops, Bill Cosby and the ‘Fresh Prince’ understand they are being worked over, manipulated, degraded and even ‘educated,’ though in a very perverted manner? Of course they don’t. They haven’t got a clue.

But what about those “good shows” that so many I speak to say they watch? Indeed, there are shows that rise above the level of boob bait and monkey shines, this is true. I’ve seen a number of PBS documentaries, for example the Frontline broadcasts, that really are quite informative. For these “good shows” the Jews aren’t writing for dimwitted whites, or hotheaded Mestizos or anarchic blacks. No, they’ve got to be careful with viewers of the “good shows.”

What the media Jews accomplish with a sledgehammer for viewers of garbage TV won’t work with viewers of the “good shows,” so they use a feather; subtle sweet and agreeable messages whispered repeatedly. But the end result is the same, the shaping of a person’s mind in accordance with the Jew’s worldview.

However, the reason why I don’t even watch the so called “good shows” is because I don’t have the strength to resist the embedded propaganda. I think these shows with their liberal assumptions and materialistic temptations will affect my mind; I think they will alter my behavior; I think the Jews are clever and know exactly how to whisper corruption into my ear; they can, I believe, corrupt any audience for any type of show on any medium which they control. I didn’t think this way until I stopped watching TV, and I’m not about to start again.

So, I read books, and with books I can carefully select what ideas I wish to entertain. I can pursue my interests unfettered, and take the time to consider what someone else took the time to write. But even with books one must be on guard: the Jew’s media matrix wants all minds returned to the grid and they know how to seduce.

Since I buy a lot of books I’m often sent email solicitations from a big online book seller. According to their software I’ve been categorized as a conservative and my inbox is filled with solicitations for conservative books, books written, of course, by Jews like Mona Charon, John Podhoretz, Mark Levin, and Bernard Goldberg; I had to chuckle when I noticed the title of Mona Charon’s recent book “Useful Idiots.” I assume that Charon must be referring to the readers of her books, the ones the pay for her nonsense.

Of course there are a few approved Goys listed in these solicitations, like Newt Gingrich, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity. There was even a time, during the Iraq War buildup, when I was being sent solicitations for books about Winston Churchill, books like "Never Give In" and "We Shall Not Fail;" books praising Churchill for rallying the British against Adolph Hitler.

This barrage for Churchill books, of course, was not unplanned; it was part of an orchestrated Jew’s media campaign. It sought to draw comparisons between George Bush and the Iraq War and Winston Churchill and WWII, and secondly between Adolph Hitler and Saddam Hussein. The president’s speech writers were so desperate to complete this anology they even clipped a line from one of Winston Churchill’s speeches for Bush to recite: remember the “grave and gathering threat” tag?

Well, I’ve read quite a bit of Churchill’s writings and I’ve read a lot of serious commentary about the man, and the sketch of Churchill we get from the pulp history booksellers and the electronic Jew’s media bears little relation to the real man. Let me be clear I’m not an admirer of Churchill’s war mongering against National Socialist Germany. I think Britain and the United States ought to have been allied with the Hitler and every dollar and bullet ought to have been used to defeat Jewish Bolshevism in the Soviet Union. That didn’t happen, unfortunately.

You know there is another side of Churchill that the Jew’s media didn’t tell the public as they were manufacturing public consent for war against Iraq. There is a side of Churchill that, in today’s multicultural America is not so attractive.

But, what the public doesn’t know about Churchill they don’t need to know! Right? And after all we are supposedly fighting a war for universal democracy and it wouldn’t further the agenda if the public was informed of Churchill’s doubts about democracy, now would it? The lemmings also wouldn’t need to know that in his exhaustive multivolume history of WWII nowhere did Churchill mention the Jew’s holocaust fable. The lemmings also wouldn’t need to know that many of his books feature views not politically and socially acceptable in today’s diverse and multicultural America, thoughts and sentiments some would charge are racist and Anti-Semitic.

Listeners may recall in a previous broadcast (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind256k.mp3) I read to you quotes from the February 8th edition of the Sunday Herald for year 1920 (http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=319358&postcount=9) in which Churchill warns that civilized Europe is being threatened by Jewish Bolshevism.

Anyway, the more I learn about the real Churchill, especially some of his thoughts and deeds before WWII the more I like him. In 1899 Churchill was part of a British expeditionary force sent to reconquer the Sudan, an African territory south of Egypt. There a small British garrison at Obdurman had succumbed to siege of Muslims led by the so called ‘Mad Madhi.’

This tale of imperial adventure was written by Winston Churchill in his book The River War (http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext04/7rivr10.txt), and is available free on the internet. Though the story is most interesting I mention this book to illustrate Churchill’s views on race which he and his contemporaries (that is our ancestors) freely expressed, without fear of censorship, and often in popular newspapers and books.

Tonight, I’m happy to have James Hawthorne co-host of Aryan Matters (http://www.aryanmatters.com/main.html) read selected paragraphs from Churchill’s book The River War. Early in the book Churchill describes the three categories of savages common in the Sudan, beginning with the Negroes:

The indigenous inhabitants of the country were negroes as black as coal. Strong, virile, and simple-minded savages, they lived as we may imagine prehistoric men—hunting, fighting, marrying, and dying, with no ideas beyond the gratification of their physical desires, and no fears save those engendered by ghosts, witchcraft, the worship of ancestors, and other forms of superstition common among peoples of low development. They displayed the virtues of barbarism. They were brave and honest. The smallness of their intelligence excused the degradation of their habits. Their ignorance secured their innocence. Yet their eulogy must be short, for though their customs, language, and appearance vary with the districts they inhabit and the subdivisions to which they belong, the history of all is a confused legend of strife and misery, their natures are uniformly cruel and thriftless, and their condition is one of equal squalor and want.

I hope some of you take the time to read this paragraph; I’ll post it on VNN. Churchill really was a master of the written work. We don’t hear prose like that anymore nor can our most talented artists freely express themselves in such a manner. Journalists and politicians certainly can’t write such things and expect to survive criticism by the Jew’s media.

Anyway, Churchill continues in his description of the Arabs


For more than a thousand years the influence of Mohammedanism, which appears to possess a strange fascination for negroid races, has been permeating the Soudan, and, although ignorance and natural obstacles impede the progress of new ideas, the whole of the black race is gradually adopting the new religion and developing Arab characteristics. In the districts of the north, where the original invaders settled, the evolution is complete, and the Arabs of the Soudan are a race formed by the interbreeding of negro and Arab, and yet distinct from both. In the more remote and inaccessible regions which lie to the south and west the negro race remains as yet unchanged by the Arab influence. And between these extremes every degree of mixture is to be found. In some tribes pure Arabic is spoken, and prior to the rise of the Mahdi the orthodox Moslem faith was practised. In others Arabic has merely modified the ancient dialects, and the Mohammedan religion has been adapted to the older superstitions; but although the gap between the Arab-negro and the negro-pure is thus filled by every intermediate blend, the two races were at an early date quite distinct.

As I hear these words I find it amazing that someone who has expressed skepticism about mass Democracy and written politically incorrect racial and anti-Semitic views can be so easily remade into a crusader for universal democracy on behalf of a multiracial cesspit like the United States. Really, think about: all those facts – easily obtainable – on race and the Jews can be excluded the public relations reprocessing of Churchill’s image.

Notice, too how gullible the public is, the lemmings simply swallow what it is fed to them. I don’t recall any resistance to the Jew’s remaking of Churchill. Really, think for a moment, and ask yourself, just how much misinformation have you accepted as fact? It is not just the big and obvious stuff like we’ve discussed tonight, but small little distortions which are repeated and repeated until they are digested into the public’s consciousness.

As long as the Jews control our media we really can’t be certain anything they are telling us about news or history is truthful or accurate. We – our people – are at their mercy.

I’ll close with Churchill’s description of the mongrels of the Sudan, mongrelism is something we are going to be seeing a lot more or in the kwa:

The qualities of mongrels are rarely admirable, and the mixture of the Arab and negro types has produced a debased and cruel breed, more shocking because they are more intelligent than the primitive savages. The stronger race soon began to prey upon the simple aboriginals; some of the Arab tribes were camel-breeders; some were goat-herds; some were Baggaras or cow-herds. But all, without exception, were hunters of men. To the great slave-market at Jedda a continual stream of negro captives has flowed for hundreds of years. The invention of gunpowder and the adoption by the Arabs of firearms facilitated the traffic by placing the ignorant negroes at a further disadvantage. Thus the situation in the Soudan for several centuries may be summed up as follows: The dominant race of Arab invaders was unceasingly spreading its blood, religion, customs, and language among the black aboriginal population, and at the same time it harried and enslaved them.

Thanks again, James Hawthorne of Aryan Matters (http://www.aryanmatters.com/main.html) for reciting those selections.

You are on ignore and that is the last show of yours to which I shall ever listen.

The mongrel, homosexual, Tonypandy, Gallipoli, Kurd gassing (shades of Hussein) mass-murder Churchill might have his good points. I don't see them. I don't listen to jew crap on the tv, not prepared to listen to it here. Numerous Whites could have been quoted on the same issue.

The queerness of using, to ramp up a war on a man who supposedly gassed the Kurds, the image of a man that actually did would have been sufficent.

Churchill the jew? (http://judicial-inc.biz/winston_churchill_biography.htm)

A most uncivilised means of warfare (http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/witness2history/16.html)

*vomits*

The conqueror's bloodlust (http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/witness2history/17.html)

You are not listening anymore.... well, I'm just all torn up about that.

Sorry for this late "thank you", but fact is my computer is so damn slow, and down-loading time is so lengthy, I don't listen to much VNN radio programming. But I know damn well it's super effective.

Keep up the great work, and thanks for all you do for Race and Nation. Rest assured I'll do the best I can with TAA to bring more and more White folks to VNN radio to listen to our great radio personalities: Chain, Alex, Agis, Stan, and now Geoff Beck.

My hearty Hail Victory to you all !!!

I found the show informative. Churchill is a puzzle inside a riddle wrapped in an enigma. His London Illustrated Sunday Herald article on the Jews is but one side of this. Plus the books he wrote on the topics mentioned in the show, proves to me beyond doubt the theory, that the Jews paid off old Winston's many debts and therefore he was beholden to them until death.

I disagree with Cthulhu in his postulation that the show was "pro-Churchill". I didn't find that at all. The main question regarding Churchill is .. why did he turn ? As I explained above that is the only reason so far which answers that question .. sort of !

Viking Warrior:

I disagree with Cthulhu in his postulation that the show was "pro-Churchill".

Thankyou, it certainly was not intended to be another mindless glorification of Churchill. The purpose of the broadcast was to illustrate how a complicated figure like Churchill can be so easily simplified for mass consumption for Jewish media purposes.

From the broadcast:

Let me be clear I’m not an admirer of Churchill’s war mongering against National Socialist Germany. I think Britain and the United States ought to have been allied with the Hitler and every dollar and bullet ought to have been used to defeat Jewish Bolshevism in the Soviet Union. That didn’t happen, unfortunately.

Imagine a jew is listen to a jews station and some guy comes on saying how Hitler wrote great prose and recommending everybody read him, saying that he likes the guy more and more. What would the jew be doing? And that is why the jew is winning so far. Geoff Beck comes on and says the same things about one of the greatest jewish mass-murderers of Whites in history and shit, if it isn't just like water off a ducks back.

Carole Ward had it right when she said we have to start getting into people's faces just like the jews do if we want to win. Well do you!?! I mean, seriously, it is hard to tell. What is going to be on next week, a homily to Lenin?

Naw, fuck this. You go follow this man's advice, you go read this jew's lovely prose, but while doing so keep in your mind's eye the white woman running down the street a living torch with a baby in her arms after having been purposely targeted with phosphorous, the cowed children who had for the time being escaped the firestorm now hunted down by the machine-gun fire aimed at them by the low flying planes. The black sengelese troops marching into the makeshift brothel where german girls as young as twelve are forced to satisfy their bestial needs.

I know I can't stand the thought of it! WHY AREN'T YOU ANGRY!!!!!!!!!

Why are you not so furious you just can't keep silent? Why do you want to lose?

What I find interesting about Winston Churchill, was his lengthy article published in a London newspaper in 1920, in which he clearly and in detail, stated that jews were the leaders in, and the instigators of, the 1917 bolshevik revolution in Russia. And also that the vast majority of Russian communist leaders were jewish.

Yes, he recanted and apologized to the jews subsequently. But Henry Ford Sr also apologized. And both eagerly supported the Allies which including jewish-led communist Russia, in defeating nationalist Germany.

Ford, in my opinion, was stampeded by jewish war hysteria in the media, and by ZOG's daily hate propaganda against Hitler, just like 99.999 percent of all White Americans. Few had the guts to face the social consequences of being in opposition.

Churchill, who to a large extent was indebted financially to the jews, also hated the possibility of Germany becoming economically equal or superior to Great Britain should Germany become the dominant country in continental Europe. Churchill also felt a strong responsibility towards his fellow elite WASP friends, who's continued power and wealth rested on their centuries long collaboration with international jewry.

He was a fuck'n jew!

Plenty of rabbis commented on the jewishness of the revolution, big fuck'n deal.

Did Ford have a homosexual affair with an actor? Was his mother's maiden name Jacobson? Did he return the medal bestowed upon him by the 3rd Reich? Did he order the terror bombings of an already defeated nation? Did he help initiate a war and work tirelessly to bring America into the conflict thereby destroying the British Empire Hitler wanted to preserve and making the UK forever a vassel of jew led AmeriKwa?

Tell me rounder, defender of jews.

And that is how it starts, little by little. Here is the good side of this mass-murdering jew. Jee-whizz...

If VNN broadcasting is going to become the defender of the jew and those who helped destroy the west, it can go get fucked. NO JEWS. JUST RIGHT.

"As for crimes against humanity, those governments which ordered the destruction of German cities, thereby destroying irreplaceable cultural values and making burning torches out of women and children, should also have stood before the bar of justice." Hon Jaan Lattik. Estonian statesman, diplomat and historian

"It was the indiscriminate bombing of civilians by the so-called strategic air forces during the Second World War which culminated in the destruction of Dresden (a wholly non-military objective) in February, 1945, that completely pulverized the code of civilized warfare and returned the treatment of military opponents and civilians to the level of the primary warfare that had prevailed among the savages, the Assyrians, and the medieval Mongols.

"On the basis of the most authoritative British sources, Mr. Veale demonstrates clearly that it was the British and not the Nazis who introduced indiscriminate strategic bombing, despite the efforts of Hitler to avert this reversion to barbaric practices." Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, Ph.D. American historian

"In terms of personal success, there has been no career more fortunate than that of Winston Churchill. In terms of human suffering to millions of people and destruction of the noble edifice of mankind there has been no career more disastrous." The European and English Journal

Hey, I'll go further. Did Ford constantly try to bring a state of war into being between his nation and Germany? Quite the opposite. When Hitler declared war on America (a bad decision on his part in my mind altho' America was already to all intent and purposes at war with Germany having even attacked and invaded German territory before the declaration) what options did Ford have? Few and far between.

To compare Ford with this miserable miscreant jew in order to defend the jew is revolting and so kike-alike. You should be ashamed!

Frankly, it seems you are more interested in breathless attacks on me than any other subject, including the pedigree of Winston Churchill.

Knowing what we know of this jewish agent Churchill, let us examine this article of Churchill's and discover the real "policy of appeasement". It is nothing less than an appeal, more a cleverly crafted demand with menaces, for a jewish state. It is no different than many things stated by other jewish Zionists of the times.

Where is the puzzle? Where is the mystery? Where is the enigma?

And after the success of the "Great Patriotic War", when Germany had decimated the jewish bolshiviks, and the criminal jewish state had been formed the "iron curtain" descended and the back and forth of "1984" began. Beware when fighting against monsters you don't become one.

Knowledge of jewish influence in the affair of the world unlocks puzzles, mysteries and enigmas.

Tell me, Cthulu, can you provide any direct evidence, other than one allegation printed by Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post? Now, please don't post heresay or speculation by Churchill's detractors; I mean direct and corroborated evidence.

Please keep in mind, the original purpose of this week's TTIND broadcast was not to discuss whether or not Churchill was a Jew, but rather the manipulation of historical persona (justified or not) by the Jew's media to justify the Iraq war. That is something you don't seem to acknowlege in your breathless attacks against me.

First off: Get over yourself. Most of my posts have been directed at Churchill and principle not you personally. He screams in pain as he hits does ole Becky boy.

Tell me, Cthulu,

Nice way to mis-spell my handle arsewipe.

can you provide any direct evidence, other than one allegation printed by Moshe Kohn, Jerusalem Post?

Already given a link. But no you want more don't you. That is what the next statement is for because you know I have already provided more.

Now, please don't post heresay or speculation by Churchill's detractors; I mean direct and corroborated evidence.


Name changing, the name itself, the industries involved, activities involved in, friends and aquantinces. How does a jew wise spot a crypto jew, pray tell? Western Civilisation left in ruins perhaps.

Heaven forbid that anyone should be a detractor of Churchill!

Please keep in mind, the original purpose of this week's TTIND broadcast was not to discuss whether or not Churchill was a Jew, but rather the manipulation of historical persona (justified or not) by the Jew's media to justify the Iraq war. That is something you don't seem to acknowlege in your breathless attacks against me.

My attacks against you? Fuck you little man.

The queerness of using, to ramp up a war on a man who supposedly gassed the Kurds, the image of a man that actually did would have been sufficent.
-- Cthulhu


I didn't acknowledge it? Piss off. There is direct evidence to the contrary. Go on, keep on defending the senseless psychopathic murderer of millions of Whites.

At first I thought you were just stunningly ignorant, and had a barrow to push concerning your Evola elite bullshit, but now I have to wonder if you yourself are not an agent of the enemy.

Seen me lauding a man like Churchill, responsible for so much senseless destruction upon our people, in the words of another, "In terms of human suffering to millions of people and destruction of the noble edifice of mankind there has been no career more disastrous."? No. But you have. Deal with it. Be a man and apologise or accept that some of us are going to consider you don't have the credentials of someone with the best interests of the White race in mind.

You haven't answered one of my attacks on Churchill but instead intimated I had some ulterior motive of attacking you personally. He crys out in pain as he hits does ole Becky boy.

Like I said, apologise or get bend. You want to laud that psychopathic jewish agent resposible for bringing so much calamity on my peoples' heads, expect a healthy stream of Ayran hatred.

Ghandi's early writings are interesting and worth looking into as well. For one thing he complained about British policy equating his Brahman caste with common "kaffirs". It's good that more people be made aware of these, if for no other reason than to show them the difference between the official image and reality.

If Geoff had read from some of those, I don't think many would mistake it for promotion of Ghandi, Hinduism, etc.

I just listened to the latest TTIND can't understand what could be so upsetting about it to a WN, even if Churchill was a favorite pet peeve.

But now you have turned the topic to attacking you, let's give it the old fashioned college try. Let's look at your disclaimer, your anti-version of "I'm not a rascist but..." At best it shows your guilty conscious, at worst an attempt to disarm before you insert your poison.

It also shows you expected some kind of response along the lines of what I have given and now you act all innocent, "Poor ole Becky. That nasty Cthewlu is being mean and nasty to him when all he wanted to do was inform and edify us."

And Becky crys, "Why are you attacking me. You're not interested in Churchill. You just hate poor ole little me, who cares so much, and was just trying to be so good and nice. Look I said I wish the nazis had been supported. Oh, mercy me. Why are you attacking me, Cthewlu? Poor ole innocent me? You anti-beckite."

Do what you should do and I won't have to do what is distasteful to me.

Ghandi's early writings are interesting and worth looking into as well. For one thing he complained about British policy equating his Brahman caste with common "kaffirs". It's good that more people be made aware of these, if for no other reason than to show them the difference between the official image and reality.

If Geoff had read from some of those, I don't think many would mistake it for promotion of Ghandi, Hinduism, etc.

I just listened to the latest TTIND can't understand what could be so upsetting about it to a WN, even if Churchill was a favorite pet peeve.

Millions of dead White women and children, and the world in which we find ourselves to day.

I think the "allied war effort" is more to blame for producing Churchill, especially as most know him, than the other way around.

The only real praise Beck seems to have for Churchill is that he writes well, and I have to agree if the excerpts he used are representative.

I Don't know much about Churchill myself. I've read some things on the internet before which showed he wasn't nearly as pc as the mass-media would like us all to think he was. The short readings Beck chose were unfamiliar to me and frankly they made me interested in finding out more. I'm pretty sure that was the intention, and it worked as far as I'm concerned.

He wisely advised against wasting money on biographies, not that it affected me personally anyway. I can't afford 1/10 of the books I want and Churchill isn't the highest on my list of interests right now. However I do have a library card and have even been known to use it :D

Again I don't know that much about Churchill, but my impression(before and especially after hearing the last TTIND) is that he was a figurehead as much as anything. I doubt he was much more important to the second world war than Bush is to this war in Iraq. If Bush has a heart attack tomorrow, there won't be sudden change in our government's direction.

I wouldn't be surprised if most or all of what you say about Churchill is true, Cthulhu. I'd like to know more, but I doubt if Churchill is important enough to have WN's attacking each other as heretics for pointing out a good quality here or not cursing him loudly enough there.

Imagine if you heard him saying that the more he learns about the real Lincoln the more he likes him? The more he learns about the real FDR, the more he likes him? The more he learns about the real Bush, the more he likes him? The more he learns about the real Sharon the more he likes him? Excepting the scope of Churchill's destructive perfidity is greater than at least the last two (tho' Bush still has some time to match him in the future).

Maybe you would think you had stepped into the twilight zone. But here we have it. Winston Churchill was known to be an ardent proponent of not only war with Germany but its destruction, stating as much in 1936! Winston Churchill made the targeting of women, children and the elderly a key plank in the war effort:

"They (the British Air Chiefs) argued that the desired result, of reducing German industrial production, would be more readily achieved if the homes of the workers in the factories were destroyed; if the workers were kept busy arranging for the burial of their wives and children, output might reasonably be expected to fall." Advance to Barbarism, F.J.P Veale; Distinguished British Jurist

What does Goring think of Churchill as just a figure head, some sort of fat, jovial, bumpkin:

I have an only too well grounded opinion of your power and the cunning of your intelligence to credit you with believing the vulgar propaganda with which you motivated the war against us and with which you have had your victory over us glorified in a fantastic show.

I state here with great emphasis as one of the highest military, political and economic leaders of the Great German Empire the following: This war could not be avoided because the politics of Great Britain - under the influence of your person and of your friends of like opinions in all fields - persisted constantly to hinder the life interests and the most natural development of the German people; and - filled with the senile ambition to uphold the British hegemony - preferred the Second World War to an understanding, as we on our side had tried time and again to bring about, beneficial to both of the most prominent nations of Europe.

I declare herewith once more and most emphatically that the guilt of the German people in this war - into which they were forced by you - consists solely in trying to end the eternal difficulties to their national existence, which you artfully instigated and continued.
-- Goring, Last Letter addressed to Churchill



Here is what one British man thinks of him: The Iroquois Monster (http://www.ety.com/HRP/walshcomments/monster.htm)

Don't know about the Indiun blood claim, but it at least shows the level of animosity any healthy and well-informed White man should have to this nefarious, callous and disgusting monster.

His victims deserve better.

What does Goring think of Churchill as just a figure head, some sort of fat, jovial, bumpkin That letter is a last ditch appeal, and done properly. What else would they do? Beg Churchill's handlers to be nice? To me it looks like the words of someone who believes Churchill is owned, but hopes himself wrong. All they can do is treat Churchill as a leader and give him one last chance.

Why not try?

Imagine if someone could get through to Bush, and he gave a speech tomorrow and condemned "israel" for it's crimes? No, it's not going to happen, but even as a figurehead he could at least throw things into chaos. Imagine him deviating from the lines on the teleprompter.

This is off the subject but I wonder what would happen next? I imagine the big networks would start reporting that he'd had a stroke or something. "The president is not well!"

Anyway, point is, who else is Goring going to contact? The jews? Hess tried to go over Churchill's head, aryan-wise, but that didn't work out.

I don't see of what your defence of Churchill consists. He helped annihalite Western Civilisation. That he was just a figure head in it and so that makes it all better? Even if I agreed with your contention, his victims still deserve better than to have praise granted to one of the conspirators, even if only a figurehead, in their murder.

Do you not somehow see this?

Is, "The more I learn about the real General William T. Sherman the more I like him," a more convenient analogy for you to comprehend?

By the way, Goering wasn't appealing to anybody. He had already resigned himself to death. Goering wasn't some coward appealing to his enemies, but faithful to the last, and just, if you will forgive the wording, looking his enemy straight in the eye and saying, "You may fool some, but you and I both know the real score."

Is, "The more I learn about the real General William T. Sherman the more I like him," a more convenient analogy for you to comprehend?

You've made a mountain out of a mole hill. And your flaming against Geoff is unwarranted. Thus, you're counter-productive to this thread.

All honest jew-wise WNs dispise Churchill. All Geoff said was that he liked some aspects of Churchill especially some displayed prior to WWII. Churchill's 1920 essay on Russian communism being jewish, published in the London newspaper, was certainly something to be liked by WNs then and today.

BTW, you've been on this forum for a full year, but never contributed one dime to TAA, nor distributed one. Why then, should we not consider you just another loud mouthed, do-nothing-contribute-nothing, punk enjoying your hobby, parasite-like on the backs of those who pay the bills and do the work here ??

Good show Geoff on Churchill. It’s true whether friends or foes in WW1 WW2, the statements understood the Africans well as a distant species. WW2 was disastrous; Churchill was in a financial crisis, thus the Jew bankster replace Chamberlain: peace in our time!)

Try back in a week. SS

As this is an ACTIVISM thread, your way out of line. Discussion is one thing, insults are another. Take a week ofF to think about that Cthulhu.

I've enjoyed your shows thus far, Mr. Beck.

It's refreshing to see Evola discussed in "WN programming," although I think you require a bit of further study in the Traditionalist arena. I say that because I found your analysis of the Baron's writings on the regression of castes/secret of degeneration to be a bit simplistic, and also from the fact that you did not recognise the word "Kundalini" (which should be immediately recognised -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kundalini), ) when it was employed by a caller, but rather confused it with the Kali Yuga. I highly recommend tackling the Vedic texts in earnest when time allows it. Have you read the Bhagawad Gîta?

You were entirely correct in the assertion that the only positive aspects of Christianity are those grafted onto the religion by our Germanic ancestors; a striking example of this can be found in the Heliand, the epic Saxon poem of the 9th century in which Jesus was portrayed as a conquering Karl der Große type figure, Bethlehem as a hill-fort, and the 12 apostles as 12 Frankish magnates.

I look forward to calling in to the show and having a dialogue sometime. Keep up the good work!

Hello TowardWewelsburg :

Thanks for you comments, and yes my understanding of Evola's theories are not extensive, though I've read his major works and am intrigued by them; and yes, my explanation of Evola's Caste Theory was reduced, though the gist, I think, was adequately explained.

I've enjoyed your comments and welcome any criticism.

Oh, I have not read the Hindu book you've mentioned, though it is on my list.

Best Wishes to you.

The Truth is No Defense: 1/21/2006 #9

Listen Here to The Truth is No Defense Archive
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm


Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls


Something is terribly wrong, so wrong, so monumental, so comprehensive is the scope of this crisis it is hard to concisely describe it. Perhaps if I refer to a movie most of us have seen this might help to clarify the problem. Do you recall the plot of the movie The Invasion of the Body Snatchers? An alien vegetative life form attaches itself to humans who are asleep, and while the victim sleeps this alien plant material makes an exact copy of the victim, and when the reproduction is finished the original, that is the authentic person, is killed and the replicant assumes his identity. Of course there is a small band of aware people that are attempting to forestall their doom by not sleeping and at the same time concealing their knowledge from the ever growing number of replicant imposters.

The plot of this movie does describe the crisis we confront, which is that something deeply illegitimate has replaced the legitimate - on a vast civilization scale. Still, I think many will not understand what I’m getting at. I’d like to use a more personal example, if you will indulge me? My family has lived in this region of the Midwest which includes Iowa, Missouri, and Kansas since the 1880s. Beginning with my great grandfather to my own father all the men in my paternal line worked in the construction industry (http://sections.asce.org/kc/kchist.html) building bridges, schools, post offices and roads. I really can’t say what all they built, though I know my grandfather and father worked together on the ASB Bridge (http://sections.asce.org/kc/Images/asb-1.jpg?149,63) which spans the Missouri River in Kansas City.


Sometimes I must travel to downtown Kansas City, a city which my family – including cousins and uncles – were chased out of in the 1960s and 1970s by black youths. These youths – or thugs really - were inserted into the public schools by court ordered desegregation rulings. In the subsequent decades the crime problem has grown mightily, for the year 2005 the murder count was 127, in the 1950s (when blacks were kept under control and the Mexicans in Mexico) the rate must have been near to zero. So, today, I reluctantly travel to city of my family, and when I do I sometimes visit the ASB Bridge, or motor around a few old buildings with stone facades and ornate details and grand entrances. Other times I like to visit the bluffs that rise above the Missouri River to gaze out over the vast prairie, a view which has remained unchanged for centuries.

I have often wondered had my ancestors visited these buildings, perhaps motoring as I had just done or entering those grand entrances? Had they too enjoyed the view of the prairie high atop the bluff?

If by some miracle my ancestors could return to life, and if they could join me in a tour of the Midwest, they would surely recognize these same streets, buildings, and landscapes. But those who inhabit the buildings and walk those streets would be as alien to them as Martians. I don’t think they could understand what America has become, no matter what buildings and landscapes they might recognize. They could not recognize the terms of contemporary political debate; they could not recognize the nation whose infrastructure they had built. Betrayal might be foremost in their minds, as they would watch the children of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East traverse the roads and bridges they had built.

This substitution effect, or the inversion of the natural order of centuries is an earth shaking event that few seem to grasp.

Kevin MacDonald (http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/), the author of the Culture of Critique (http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail~bookid~8622.aspx), who some refer to as the ‘John Locke of our time’, is also from the Midwest. There is a section in the CofC that is unlike the rest of the book, a section that seems to echo my alienation and the loss of my birthright in the nation my father’s built. In this final chapter entitled “Whither Judaism and the West” MacDonald writes

…it is the descendants of the WASPS who settled the West and South who “by and large did the most to lay out the infrastructure of this country, quite often suffering educational and professional regression as they tamed the wilderness, built the towns, roads and schools…Today they have the least, socioeconomically, to show for these contributions. And if one would care to check a map, they are from the areas now evincing the greatest resistance to government practices.” The war goes on, but it is easy to see who is losing.


I’m convinced that no man of our past if he returned today could ever make sense of the world of 2006. This is not a declaration of progress, or the wonders of technology, no it is a comment on demographics and degeneracy. It is comment on the degeneration of human quality. Could our imaginary ancestor, resurrected from the past, cope with the mongrelization of his race, could he cope with the swelling population Blacks, Asiatics and Mestizos on soil that his been his own?

There is a web or thread of tradition that at one time we were connected to. T.S. Eliot in his 1922 essay Tradition and the Individual Talent (http://www.bartleby.com/200/sw4.html) considered the obligation an artist has to the past, and the artist’s role in honoring and furthering the traditions of centuries past. He noticed there was a thread, or a web, that had united him with Dostoevsky, and Dostoevsky with Shakespeare, and Shakespeare with the Medieval Bards, and the Bards with Virgil, and Virgil with Homer. Eliot wrote,

...the historical sense involves a perception, not only of the pastness of the past, but of its presence; the historical sense compels a man to write not merely with his own generation in his bones, but with a feeling that the whole of the literature of Europe from Homer and within it the whole of the literature of his own country has a simultaneous existence and composes a simultaneous order.

Eliot continues,

…no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone. His significance, his appreciation is the appreciation of his relation to the dead artists. …what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the works of art which preceded it.

I cannot be sure, of course, but I think Eliot might agree that the continuity of tradition – the connection to the dead of centuries past – that he spoke of has now been severed. That’s why a Jew Frank Gehry (http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=321551&postcount=18) who mocks and belittles traditional forms, creating monstrosities like Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain, is exalted as an architect. That’s why we ennoble the incoherent paint drippings of Jackson Pollack as paintings, and that’s why we label the illiterate yelps of blacks as music!

Whether it be the mad visions of Frank Gehry or the vomit stained canvases of Jackson Pollock these things are not elements in Eliot’s thread of tradition; in fact they are alien to our race, every bit as foreign as the vegetative invaders in the movie The Invasion of the Body Snatchers. What passes for art today is not an augmentation of existing forms and traditions, which Eliot described, but a revolutionary break with past tradition. Gehry, Pollock, and Snoop-Dog deserve all the respect accorded to a pack of feral dogs devouring the carcass of deer along a busy interstate

But something even more profound has occurred, something revolutionary.

When we think of revolutions most imagine statues pulled down, an assassinated dictator, a guillotined monarch, or fighting in the capital city, often for control of the radio station or an armory. This is the prototypical style of revolution modeled on the French Revolution of 1798, where the monarch was executed and a radical government took its place instituting radical change: the calendar was redesigned, and measuring systems replaced, and churches re-christened as ‘temples of reason.’ This is one type of revolution, the type most of us are familiar with.

But there is another type of revolution, where instead of overthrowing the government the culture is overthrown. This is type of revolution which overthrew the American regime founded in 1776, and created a new state, one born in the 1960s and 70s.

Unlike the French Revolution of 1798, in this revolution the churches were not renamed, the universities were not burned down, the calendar wasn’t refashioned. No, everything looks the same as before, but what is said and taught in the churches, in the schools, and what is done by our government - that is what has changed.

After a decade or so of radical change the new regime – which overthrew the old - consolidated itself in the 1980s and 1990s, and is now firmly in control; a regime so confident that it can now promote conservatism, of a sort. It’s not the conservatism of the old regime of 1776, but a new form of conservatism, one in which the radicalism of the 1960s and 1970s is now institutionalized and regulated by law in American life. The new conservatism is nothing more that an affirmation of the previous generation’s radicalism. This is why conservatism is utter folly.

The technique the revolutionaries used to overthrow the culture was to sieze control of the institutions that inform and teach the public and especially the young about the nation, slowly subverting the traditions and accepted wisdom of generations. Some, like Revilo Oliver, recognized what was happening but most – even those that objected – eventually fell in line with the new order.

Lets look at a example of the ‘new order’ in practice, the 14thamendment first ratified in 1868, under questionable circumstances, was understood as an amendment guaranteeing citizenship to blacks, and that blacks would be entitled to a certain “due process” in the courts of each State, of course that process was the right of each state to decide. Anyway, for most of this amendment’s history both segregation and the so called “Jim Crow” laws were not considered in violation of the 14th Amendment. Furthermore, it was never the intention of the 14th amendment to guarantee citizenship rights to any piece of Third World filth that could simply cross the border and poop out a baby, and nor could it have been imagined that same piece of filth could be entitled to taxpayer funded welfare benefits, but that is exactly what the Supreme Court discovered in 1999 in the ‘Saenz vs. Roe’ case.

Let me tell you exactly why this has happened. It is because the legal organs of the United States have been subverted; Jews have remade American legal jurisprudence in accordance with their worldview. This infiltration began in the 1960s when Jews were let into our elite universities in large numbers, before that time quotas were in place restricting the number of Jews admitted. Once inside they did what Jews have always done – subvert. Today Jews have seized the commanding heights in elite law schools and are using their power to subvert our morality as expressed in the legal body.

So who are these Jews subverting our culture? Ok let’s name some names: first there is Georgetown University Law School Dean, T. Alexander Aleinikoff (http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=201392&postcount=57) who said "diversity will not only be tolerated but celebrated." Mr. Aleinikoff also served as executive associate commissioner with the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the INS. By the way, the INS has now been rolled into the department of Homeland Security which is also headed by another Jew, Michael Chertoff.

The list of Jews ruling our laws schools doesn't stop with Mr. Aleinikoff, but continues with Judith Resnik (http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=201369&postcount=52) at Yale Law; George Cohen (http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=201366&postcount=51), University VA Law; Michael J. Klarman, University VA Law; Deena Hurwitz (http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=201354&postcount=50), University VA Law; Risa Goluboff, University VA Law; and Susan Rose-Ackerman (http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=201379&postcount=54), Yale Law

Some listening – though I doubt very few, might ask, “hey why do Jews do this”? Why do they subvert? This is a good question. So, why do Jews use their ethnic connections and intelligence to subvert a nation rather than strengthen it? Well that really is not the subject of tonight’s broadcast but I’ll share a brief clip by William Pierce and I hope it answers your question.

[PIERCE CLIP (http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/mp3/062301.mp3)]

I’d like to replay a brief segment from Pierce’s clip again, because it clearly tells what happened and why things are so broken today. Its starts with the subversion process

[PIERCE CLIP 2]

Now that we have an understanding of the revolutionary process which has occurred we have to ask ourselves what to do? It seems there can be only one objective, to overthrow the revolution! If this is our goal then conservatism, it seems to me, is the stupidest mode of political action we might take. By definition a conservative’s loyalty is to the regime, its institutions, and its customs. But we have just discovered our institutions have been seized and remade, if they cannot be recaptured then they must be destroyed before they finish the job of killing us.

When fighting a war it might be useful to capture an enemy’s ammo and weaponry. But if it cannot be captured then it must be destroyed so that it cannot be used to kill one’s fellow soldiers. This is the position we are in now, the universities, schools, and media are weapons being used against us, to allow them to continue firing upon us is folly; if we cannot retake them they must be obliterated or we will be obliterated.

Anyway, most public officials who describe themselves as conservatives are opportunists cashing in on a favorable political label – and I’m thinking of politicians like Newt Gingrich, John Boener, Tom Delay, and George W. Bush , while a few – though I can’t think of any - are gullible, but well meaning people.

But speaking of conservatism as a political philosophy, I think it is rather defective.

Do you know of this sport called fencing? In this sport opponents wear a heavy white protective clothing and a fine wire facemask, they engage in swordplay. Actually their blades are not swords but “foils.” Anyway, the sport of fencing reminds me of conservatism. Before the match the conservative, or fencer, announces “On-Guard” and when he strikes with the tip of his flimsy foil he announces “touché.” While there might be drama and much style to such a match, it is just a friendly match. The Jew, or his servant the liberal, in contrast uses a club to savagely beat his opponent into the ground. The conservatives really don’t understand their opponents are not playing by the any set of rules, and the conservatives will always lose against such an opponent.

Thanks Geoff for the time and effort you put into your show for VNN - It is truly is appreciated.

BTW, the archive is up for those who could not listen live or had rebuffering problems.

--------------------------------------------


16K Streaming Audio (for dial-up users)
http://vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/content/gbttind916k.pls

48K Streaming Audio
http://vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/content/gbttind948k.pls

MP3 Download (27 MB)
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2006/VNNB/gbttind956k.mp3


-------------------------------------

All Archived

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

The Truth is No Defense: 4/6/2006 #11
Pest Control and 500 Years of the Mestizo Menace

Listen Here to The Truth is No Defense
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm


Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls


Making my usual drive about town I noticed the Mestizo work gangs building homes and digging ditches. Instead of becoming enraged, for some odd reason I recalled a book I read long ago by science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke, I think the book was entitled Rendezvous with Rama, but I’m not sure about that. Anyway aboard Clarke’s fictional starships trained monkeys performed service operations. Clarke thought that trained chimps could be trained to perform certain dangerous and complex tasks better than robots, at least in some cases. Though it’s been years since I read any of his books, as I recall, entire starships were staffed entirely by monkeys. Of course computers actually piloted the ship, the chimps in many cases worked as custodians. Before water wheels, steam engines, and before cranks and cam shafts animals performed labor which could only be substituted by slaves. Domesticated animals, horses, dogs, cattle truly are our servants.

Despite being bred for life among humans domesticated animals sometimes bite back. They sometimes bite the hand that feeds them. I’ve witnessed dogs, for instance, which for many years had lived benevolently among other farmyard animals suddenly attack another animal, say a chicken or calf. Though, sometimes there is a reason for such attacks: the victim is often wounded or disabled – that is weakened in some way and thereby vulnerable, perhaps by a broken wing or a sickness. Despite centuries of conditioning and natural selection whether it is the master’s hand, or another farmyard beast, domesticated animals can quickly revive their ancient survival mechanisms and bite back, often ferociously. I suppose domesticated animals have several techniques for letting other animals know to stay away, perhaps by body language, chemical signals, or grunts of various types. Without these cues it would be chaos in the farmyard, and we’ve got chaos in our farmyard.

By our own sloth, indifference and assisted by our own corrupt and venal Jew controlled government we’ve failed to provide the necessary signals to the Mestizo pests to stay out. Everyday thousands of little brown stubbies cross our southern border, and unlike the domesticated animals on our farms the Mestizos and Spics are not fenced in, vaccinated, or ear tagged – as they ought to be. They are not corralled into pens for processing and packaging – as they ought to be.

Growing up in a Kansas Prairie town in the 1920s and 30s my father told me the rabbit population would often explode. Jackrabbits, in particular, were a pest, often eating the farmer’s crops down to stubble. To address the problem the local farmers would rally at a certain area where the rabbits were known to be thick, bring with them clubs, chains and bats. Assembling themselves in a wide circle and slowly converging as a team to the center, in a manner resembling a tightening noose, the men would corral the rabbits. Of course some men had metal pots and pans and other shotguns which caused the rabbits to jump from their holes. Anyway, as the circle of men converged and the density of rabbits reached certain point the beating would begin. The farmers could pulverize hundreds of jackrabbits to death in this fashion. That was how white men used to control the pest population in the ‘good ole days’.

Unfortunately we are not able to treat our current pest problem in such a manner today, at least not yet. Still, there have been attempts.

On November 8th of 1994 the voters of California attempted to control the pests. By ballot initiative Californians approved proposition 187, denying public benefits to illegal aliens; or in plain speech getting the Mestizo parasites of the backs of the white taxpayers of California. The Mestizos, the Jews, and of course the liberal lackeys, were outraged that the Mestizo free lunch program would end. In response the Mestizos angrily paraded in Los Angeles unfurling Mexican flags, and a few American flags turned upside down. Perhaps the most succinct and memorable statement about the whole affair was uttered by Art Torres, California State Senator, Chairman of the Calfornia Democratic Party, and Mexican Invader when he said “proposition 187 is the last gasp of white America in California.” Never have truer words been spoken. The though law was passed by the voters, a Jew judge named Marianna Pfaelzer nullified the law and the will of the Californians.

Here is California State Senator Art Torres uttering his infamous words,

[Torres Clip]

All across Latin America the pests, which for centuries had been tamed the by the crack of the white man’s whip, have broken from their cages and feed lots and are now pillaging their master’s homes. These beasts are showing their fangs: the Mexican Mestizo, the Puerto Rican Spics, and the Peruvian ‘Amerindians’ smell fear and vulnerability up north. Its not just whites in America, but throughout the world European humanity is acting in the most cowardly manner, the beasts of the field can sense our weakness and saliva is dripping from their fangs.

In Latin American states, like Mexico and Columbia, the white elite have managed to maintain some control of the savages, but their grip is weak. The Mexican army put down a bloody uprising in the southern state of Chiapas in 1994, the so called Zapatista rebellion. But a brown revolution – an awakened racial consciousness – is spreading across Latin America: to the east and south, Venezuela’s brown masses, utilizing the power of democracy, have ousted the white elite, installing a charismatic brown socialist named Hugo Chavez, Chavez quickly moved against the white elite which traditionally had managed the lucrative oil interests; further south, in Peru, the Amerindians replaced a Japanese technocrat and voted in one of their kind, Alexandro Toledo; and next door, in Bolivia, Evo Morales became that nation’s first Amerindian ruler.

In his inaugural address of January 23rd of this year Mr. Morales, Bolivia's first Indian, president said these words:

I want to say to all my Indigenous brothers in America, here in Bolivia today that campaign of 500 years of resistance hasn't been in vain. Enough is enough. We are taking over now for the next 500 years.

This desire for revenge against whites runs deep in the Mestizo, and is now manifesting itself within the borders of the United States. The anger of the Mexican elite in California was still smoldering in the words of LA Country supervisor Gloria Molina in this 1996 Latino political rally:

[Molina Clip]

Gloria Molina, is just the first wave Latin American demagogues within our borders. Twenty years from now she and her team B antics will be eclipsed by a more strident form of Brown Socialism, like that which elected Evo Morales. Evo Morales, now President Morales, has described his ascendancy to the presidency of Bolivia as the "United States' worst nightmare" and what he means when he says the United States is the Yankee, gringo, the white man: it is to us, the European population of America to whom Presidente Morales is addressing his remarks. If we are wise we – by we I mean the racially conscious whites listening now – ought to treat the words of Mr. Morales seriously. Considering the disorganized state we are in as a people we ought to be very concerned about the future. States like Mexico and Bolivia have high birth rates, in contrast to the gringos in El Norte. Worse, we have a government that is cooperating with Mexico and other Latin American states in the demographic extinction of our race.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/graphics/2006/01/05/wboliv05.jpg

Anyway, the 500 years Morales referenced in his inaugural address regards arrival in Mexico, in the year 1519, of the conquistador Hernando Cortez. Landing at what is now Vera Cruz the red bearded Cortez, along with 500 men and 15 horses destroyed the Aztec Empire, a stunning victory. The disdain one conquistador had for the people he encountered Mexico was summed up thusly,

"All the people of this province of New Spain, and even those of the neighboring provinces, eat human flesh and value it more highly than any other food in the world; so much so that they often go off to war and risk their lives just to kill people to eat. The majority of them, as I have said, are sodomites and they drink to excess." (P. de Fuentes, The Conquistadors, 181)

That was written by a conquistador who had taken part in the war against the Aztecs. More recently, the future United States General and 18th President, Ulysses S. Grant took part in the so called Mexican War of 1846 – 1848. In this little remembered war Grant served under General Winfield Scott and like Cortez, they landed at Vera Cruz and from their launched an invasion of the Mexican heartland, as did Cortez nearly 500 years before. Scott’s army, with Grant, went directly for the capital, Mexico City, and there, they defeated the Mexicans at Cerro Gordo and Chapultepec.

Grant spent consider time in Mexico and overall was charmed by the exotic beauty of that country, so different from the dense humid woodland of his native Ohio. Though, he noticed Mexicans certain defects

The people of Mexico are a very different race of people than our own. The better class is very proud and tyrannizes over the lower and much more numerous class as much as a hard master does over his negroes, and they submit to it quite as humbly. (U.S. Grant)

More recently the English satirist Evelyn Waugh, who toured Mexico in the 1930s and wrote a book about his travels, entitled Robbery Under Law, The Mexican Object-Lesson, had much to say about his experiences in Mexico: In his 1939 book Waugh described the democratic process in Mexico, such as it existed,

"the Mexicans, for the most part, prefer to leave the voting papers uncounted and draw from the lists made up at the party headquarters."

Waugh also described the Mexican characterization of heroes as

"squat, swarthy, passionate, intolerant, vain men who when cornered shoot their way to freedom and take to the mountains, who will steal and promise and give lavishly, sell anything and repudiate the bargain, murder their friends and buy off their enemies, nurse a grudge and forget a kindness, sometimes grossly sacrilegious, sometimes heroically pious, Aztec and Castillian inextricably confounded."

Anyway, shortly after Cortez finished off the Mexicans, another European conqueror, Francisco Pizarro appeared. Pizarro’s sights weren’t set on subdued Mexico but on Peru and Bolivia. On his third attempt to push his way into Peru, Pizzaro exhorted his men saying "There lies Peru with its riches; Here, Panama and its poverty. Choose, each man, what best becomes a brave Castilian." Only thirteen men to up Pizzaro’s challenge, the rest abandoned him. These thirteen, the famous thirteen “Los trece de la fama” headed to Peru to take the empire of the Incas. In 1532 Pizzaro and his band of men, called the "Children of the Sun" by the natives for their fair skin, began the conquest of Peru. Incredibly, like the Aztecs the Inca Empire too fell into the hands of Spain; except for Brazil all of South America was ruled the Europeans from Spain.

Much has been made of late about the brutality and greed of the Conquistadors, both Cortez and Pizarro are considered villains in today’s history texts; the vilification of European history is in accord with the multicultural propaganda of recent times, yet such hand wringing was not part of my education. I can clearly recall Pizarro and Cortez being portrayed as heroes in my elementary school. They were hailed for their fantastic conquests, and with so few men. Clearly, I recall, my sixth grade elementary teacher tracing his fingertip along the globe, starting at Spain, then slowly rotating the globe, keeping his finger on it, as he traversed the Atlantic ocean to Vera Cruz, Mexico and then to Mexico City. I can recall his expression of amazement, with a hint of pride, at both Cortez’s and Pizarro’s accomplishments.

Recently, while reading a book by Leszek Kolakowski (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0226450465/sr=1-1/qid=1144383983/ref=sr_1_1/103-0703767-5913429?%5Fencoding=UTF8&s=books), I encountered a peculiar passage about his visit to pre-Columbian monuments in Mexico, that is pre-Cortez Mexico. As he toured Mexico’s ruins he found himself in the company of a "of a well known Mexican writer, thoroughly versed in the history of the Indian peoples of the region." A man we might regard as a cheerleader for diversity and multiculturalism – Mexican style.

Anyway, Kolakowski writes that his guide

"…often in the course of explaining to me the significance of many things, I would not have understood without him, stressed the barbarity of the Spanish soldiers who had ground the Aztec statues into dust and melted down the exquisite gold figurines to strike with the image of the Emperor." (That would be Charles V)

To this Kolakowski replied to his guide

" you think these people were barbarians; but were they not, perhaps, true Europeans, indeed the last true Europeans? They took their Christian and Latin civilization seriously; and it is because they took it seriously that they saw no reason to safeguard pagan idols; or to bring the curiosity and aesthetic detachment of archeologists into their consideration of things imbued with a different, and therefore hostile religious significance. If we are outraged at their behavior it is because we are indifferent, both to their civilization, and to our own."

Later in the essay Kolakowski clarifies that he is not so much an admirer of Cortez, as he is disturbed by the lack of context and perspective in the understanding history, and the ideological tint it had undergone in recent years. But the point remains, Cortez and Pizarro were brave men, in many way exemplars of European bravery. Indeed, they were defenders of their civilization.




In all the fuss about the conquistadores’ greed and brutality it is forgotten just what sort of cutthroat savages Cortez and Pizarro confronted. I’d like to read to you now an excerpt from John Keegan’s A History of Warfare, a section in which the Aztec and Amerindian tactics of war are discussed, please listen carefully as this is an extended paragraph and will not be transcribed:

[P. 111 -112]

Today, the Mestizo and the Spic invaders are reviving their bloodthirsty customs and cutthroat folklore in our land; some even cloth themselves in Aztec dress and practice war hoops and strange incantations to their tribal deities, as did the Juan Manuel Alvarez (http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/26/train.derailment/)who derailed a train in Glendale, CA, killing 11 and injuring 200. Alvarez drove his truck to a Anglo section of greater Los Angeles, far from his home, and parked his truck on the tracks, exiting just before the arrival of the commuter train – but not before dousing the truck in gasoline and setting it a fire. When I read the Washington Post report about Alvarez’s life I found a curious paragraph, it turns out Alvarez belonged to a dance group called

“Xipe Totec, which performs traditional Aztec dances at churches and parades around Southern California and across the Southwest. Alvarez wore an elaborate costume, performing in a feathered headdress, loincloth and sandals. When their son was born, he and Carmelita gave him the middle name Nezahualcoyotl, after a 15th-century tribal poet-king.”

The historical record of Nezahualcoyotl mentions that he sacrificed his main foe to the gods, as a human sacrifice; no word if he was “stripped” – that is had his flesh serried from his bones then having his beating heart ripped, or was the stripping skipped on did he just have his beating heart ripped from his chest?

Just like in Mexico and now in Los Angeles, the Mestizo pests are wrecking our infrastructure through their ignorance and gratuitous brutality. The behaviour of the Mestizos is not that different from I story I recently read from South Africa about the overpopulation of elephants. The elephant population has exploded so much they are encroaching on human developments, knocking over homes, trample people, and of making the land a desert through over consumption the vegetation. The article mentions the last culling, or organized killing, to control the population of elephants last occurred in 1967.

Anyway, if we do not control our borders and redefine our nation in terms of race we will continue to be victimized by the Mestizo pests. What the Mestizos really want most is our homes, what they want are our women; they want the comfort and luxuries we enjoy: luxuries and comfort which the Spic and the Mestizo cannot construct given their feeble brain chemistry.

The intentions of the Mestizo and Spic are very clear and if one cares to follow the crime reports and demographic changes a pattern emerges, where the Mestizo and Spic go, the whites flee: whites flee the rapes, the murders, and the pestilence and ignorance the Mestizo carries wherever he travels. California’s white population is being ethnically cleansed and replaced with Mestizo; even neighborhoods like Compton – which had been colonized by Black years earlier – are being seized by the Mestizo. It might be noted that Juan Manuel Alvarez, the train saboteur, lived in Compton, a town that used to be known as a black enclave in Los Angeles. In Los Angeles, the working class whites are being pushed into the desert or sent packing to other states where the Mestizo has not yet colonized.

Unless we invoke a form of pest control we shall be deprived of our homes and lives soon enough.

It’s really too bad we can’t muster the even a small group of men, like “Los trece de la fama” famous Pizarro’s famous thirteen. The Mestizo if dealt with directly and swiftly can be easily defeated. Throughout this nation’s history we’ve rounded up the Mestizo and sent him packing back over the border, I know of at least two large pest control operations against the Mestizo, the first in California in 1931 and the second 1950s under Eisenhower, the so called Operation Wetback. The genocidal nexus of Jewish media control and multicultural propaganda in the publics schools makes a third round-up of Mestizos seem unlikely.

In closing this monologue tonight I’d like to discuss the existential threat posed by the Mestizo. There is deep malevolence and envy in the soul of the Mestizo; he is a mixed race mongrel offspring fathered by the conqueror that wrecked his mother’s civilization. Smoldering hate and simmering resentments percolate just below the surface directed against the yankee, the gringo, the hidalgos. These resentments against the white man predate those of all other aggrieved races, except for the Jew. Unlike the other invader species entering our lands, the Chinese, the Africans, the Vietnamese, and the Pakistanis, the Mestizo’s claims to the soil are stronger and older than any other groups, and they are conscious as a race of these claims. Of all the groups burrowing into our land the Mestizo has the motivation, the will, and the numbers to physically wipe us off this continent. What they lack in intelligence the Asian and the Jew can provide.

the Mestizo’s claims to the soil are stronger and older than any other groups, and they are conscious as a race of these claims. Of all the groups burrowing into our land the Mestizo has the motivation, the will, and the numbers to physically wipe us off this continent. What they lack in intelligence the Asian and the Jew can provide.

This is a great broadcast, I just read the transcript but I'm going to give it a listen to.

The closing remark commands reflection, because there is an assumption within aware White circles that dealing with the colored hordes will be easy and a very simple matter once the jew is dealt with.

Granted, the jew is the puppetmaster, the maestro of the nonwhite orchestra, BUT, as Geoff Beck points out, the Mestizo's of the Western Hemisphere have very strong claims to the land, and while they certainly aren't to be overestimated, at this juncture they shouldn't be underestimated and there's precedent for another, more cunning and intelligent race to provide leadership for the mestizo hordes in their drive to exterminate the White race from the land.

Consider Southern Africa, Chinese and North Koreans were operating behind the scenes, and those North Koreans are formidable fighters. Didn't the North Korean elite commandos train Mugabe's internal security forces??? The Chinese backed the ANC for many years, and it's born fruit, the White Man has been chased from Africa and the Chinese are crawling all over it, the new masters of a resource rich continent.

So, why wouldn't the same be repeated here, in the Kwa??? We know that White genocide is the "official" policy, though not officially discussed. It is entirely possible that the Mestizo threat will become far more formidable as their numbers and resentment of Whites intensifies.

Much to think about Kwans...

Enjoyed reading your observations, Whitefist.

--Hail Victory!
This is a great broadcast, I just read the transcript but I'm going to give it a listen to.

The closing remark commands reflection, because there is an assumption within aware White circles that dealing with the colored hordes will be easy and a very simple matter once the jew is dealt with.

Granted, the jew is the puppetmaster, the maestro of the nonwhite orchestra, BUT, as Geoff Beck points out, the Mestizo's of the Western Hemisphere have very strong claims to the land, and while they certainly aren't to be overestimated, at this juncture they shouldn't be underestimated and there's precedent for another, more cunning and intelligent race to provide leadership for the mestizo hordes in their drive to exterminate the White race from the land.

Consider Southern Africa, Chinese and North Koreans were operating behind the scenes, and those North Koreans are formidable fighters. Didn't the North Korean elite commandos train Mugabe's internal security forces??? The Chinese backed the ANC for many years, and it's born fruit, the White Man has been chased from Africa and the Chinese are crawling all over it, the new masters of a resource rich continent.

So, why wouldn't the same be repeated here, in the Kwa??? We know that White genocide is the "official" policy, though not officially discussed. It is entirely possible that the Mestizo threat will become far more formidable as their numbers and resentment of Whites intensifies.

Much to think about Kwans...

The Truth is No Defense: 4/18/2006 #12
Our Revolution Is Not Conservative

Listen Here to The Truth is No Defense
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2005/VNNB/gbttind.htm

Listen to The Truth Is No Defense and all Vanguard Radio Media 24/7!
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com:8000/listen.pls

When English General Cornwallis presented his sword to General Washington and French General Rochambeau at Yorktown in 1781 the long and bloody revolutionary war started by thirteen American colonies had finally ended. Washington then ordered the band to play "When The World Turned Upside Down," a popular tune of the day.

The American Revolution of 1776 did turn the world upside, as professor Gordon S. Wood has written in his book The Radicalism of the American Revolution. But to many Americans the radicalism of the revolution is unknown, even to Americans with an interest in history. Most contrast the bloodthirsty mayhem of the French Revolution of 1798, just a few years after our own, and assume according to the cliché that our revolution was a "conservative revolution." Wood argues life in the colonies was changed radically after the revolution.

In many ways the world men into which men like Adams, Washington, and Jefferson were born into was one closer to feudal Europe than the world we now live in. It was a world of fealty, where society had many distinct classes and each class owed obligation to those below it and service to those above it. It was a society linked by personal loyalties, and where the private and the public was hardly separated. It was a society united by blood and family. A society organized much differently than they one unleashed in 1776. The new nation would be one open to new men, based on contract and law, not upon family ties, traditions, or venerated loyalties.

The system created by the revolutionaries of 1776 worked well for a century or so, if one overlooks internal strife of 1860-65. Overall, Americans - and let me define American: White Europeans tribes mainly from Western European - enjoyed the salutary benefits of limited government, an expanding economy, and high levels of freedom.

The system created by the founders did not survive the upheavals of the Twentieth Century. A few legacy artifacts persist, if only anemically, for instance the Right to Bear Arms and the Right to Free Speech; but the right to free association and the right to be free from warrant-less searches has disappeared. Really, what does remain is twisted wreck of conflicting laws and confused customs. What remains is not worth saving.

The sooner we recognize we live in 'grinning tyranny' that has assumed the form of a constitutional republic created centuries ago, and the sooner we give up the folly of 'restoring the constitution' and focus instead on creating a new system for our people the better is our chance for survival. And when I say our chance I mean White Americans and the culture, customs, and genetics we are heir to. We may draw inspiration from the old system and we certainly ought to learn from the failures of the old system, but the idea of resurrecting the Old Republic is a puerile fantasy.

The toothpaste is out of the tube, and any honest evaluation of Congress reveals the numbers do not exist to vote our way out of this mess, and that assumes that the will and courage exists within the government to fix the mess we are in, which it does not.

Besides we know much more about the world than Jefferson or Madison did, especially in two important issues: biology and mass media.

The founders were not ignorant media and biology, Jefferson, the patient astute observer recognized that "black[s] are inferior to whites in both body and mind." Perhaps seeing forces of egalitarianism, which he had a role in unleashing, he said this:

Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people [blacks] are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.

But what they intuitively knew about Race through observation, we know from science and the costly failures welfare state. The other founders too knew the reality of race, It was not just Jefferson, John Jay said

Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people—a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and custom.

Multiculturalism was as abhorrent to the founders as it is to White Nationalists today. Benjamin Franklin even lamented the settlement of Germans in Pennsylvania, saying they were too foreign for his tastes. Imagine if the founders could see the mobs of Mestizos marching in the streets of Los Angeles or Chicago, surely Washington would raise an army and dispatch the invaders. Worse consider their reaction if they discovered that Jews were in control of the mass media.

The media in 1776, as is now, was vicious and partisan, but the media's scope was almost always local. The great thinkers of the day like Hume, Locke, and Smith were read by only a few men, but even those ideas had a powerful effect upon the world.

Today we live in a age of mass communication, mass media, mass man. We know from experience and sociology the effect of mass communications on the public, this the founders did not know, which often manifests itself in the so-called 'lemming phenomenon:' where the minds of the citizenry are systematically managed by mass media and then are deprived of the tools and information needed to think critically about the problems of the day.

Washington and Jefferson both understood that a free people could only remain so by being sober, informed and disciplined. The mass media insures the public is numbed, misinformed, and fat. Lemmings are to be pitied, they are victims of television, newsprint, billboards, and a music industry either in the hands of the Jews or serving Jew's interests: the Jew's interest is Israel and the exploitation of the society which hosts them. This is what Washington warned us about in his farewell address of 1796:

So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the hatreds of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter.

Washington, in his farewell address warned us not only about entangling alliances with overseas nations but also about elements within the nation serving foreign powers.

Despite the warnings of Washington and the wisdom of Jefferson we need to acknowledge, however much we all might love the old system, it is irreparably compromised. The goals of the coming revolution must be clear: our nation is our race; our nation is for our race; and our nation serves the interests of our race.

We need to consecrate a nation dedicated to the uplifting and improvement our race, not the defilement of it.

You must look at what is happening today and come to recognize that we have lost. Whites have lost control of the government that was created for our posterity. This government serves the interests of Jews, Blacks, and Mexicans, but it does not serve our interests.

The procedure for dispensing with the old system is beyond the scope of this broadcast. Dispense with it we must, before it dispenses with us.

Perhaps, after the revolution, a Grand Council could be formed. Members of which are selected on the basis of their service and leadership in the revolution; perhaps brothers or other family member of those that had fallen might also be selected for service.

This group, over generations, might develop into a natural aristocracy. Perhaps a sort of nobility might arise. A nobility bred and identified by their allegiance, or fealty, to the race. Perhaps, we could develop a society not based on rights, but on obligation, service, custom, and reciprocity to the race. A society which would stress the collective interest of our race. Perhaps a society more feudal in orientation,one whose mission is to preserve the race and the soil; one with a respect for commerce but not at the expense of the blood.

In Wood's book The Radicalism of the American Revolution he describes the world the founders knew before the revolution as one in which business, personal and private aspects of

life were intertwined. The household, the society, the state – private and public spheres were scarcely separated. Authority and liberty flowed not from political organizations of the society but from the structure of personal relationships.

Its seems to me the type of society we need is a 'volkisch' society were people are united by bonds of family, blood, and status. A society where the outsider can be identified and excluded.

you might want to correct your archive page , it isn't 2007 , yet .
( I know that time fly's , but you don't have to give it a push ).

you might want to correct your archive page , it isn't 2007 , yet .
( I know that time fly's , but you don't have to give it a push ).

Itz M:

Sorry, can't seem to find the 2007 reference you mentioned. Was it in the audio, transcript or some other place?

Itz M:

Sorry, can't seem to find the 2007 reference you mentioned. Was it in the audio, transcript or some other place?

from the govnn.com main page, go to the audio archieve button . From VNN media index , choose your name 'geoff beck', on that page scroll down . The last two shows are shown as 2007 , shows #11 and #12 . Either they are wrong or that last nap of mine was 365 days and one hour long :)

from the govnn.com main page, go to the audio archieve button . From VNN media index , choose your name 'geoff beck', on that page scroll down . The last two shows are shown as 2007 , shows #11 and #12 . Either they are wrong or that last nap of mine was 365 days and one hour long :)

Ah, I see it now. Thanks.