Take a look at this map It shows you how the lack of a unified Iraq has made Syria all ALONE in their struggle against Israel. Bush has already put sanctions on Syria for supporting Hamas, Hezbollah, and having chemical weapons. Syria is far weaker today than they were when Saddam was still in power.

http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Threats_to_Israel/Syria.html

What about Jordan as well? Or are they neutral, leaning to US friendship, like Saudi Arabia?

Syria is weak and you're saying thats a bad thing?

Syria is the enemy.

Get your cowardly kike ass off this forum and over to Zion so you can fight those towel-heads like a real mensch.

[QUOTE=Gladius]What about Jordan as well? Or are they neutral, leaning to US friendship, like Saudi Arabia?[/QUOTE]

Yes, the Royal family of Jordan has been bought off by millions of U.S. dollars. They usually do what the U.S. tells them.

[QUOTE=IronWorker]Hopefully the Iranians will be able to smuggle in enough resources through civil war torn Iraq to help out one of the last out-posts of anti-jew action, Syria.

This may seem heretical on VNN, but I fell any Muslim that fails to reach paradise whilst fighting the jew should be invited to Valhalla. Perhaps they could have their own separate hall.[/QUOTE]


camel fucking carpet jockey sand nigger dune coons in valhalla? no thanks.

[QUOTE=Dethicus]Syria is weak and you're saying thats a bad thing?

Syria is the enemy.[/QUOTE]

Syria is only the enemy of Israel. Islamic political parties aren't even legal in Syria. Individuals have to get special permission from the government to hold any social or political rallies there. The country is ruled by the Socialist Ba'ath Party. Syria's chemical weapons are all loaded into artillery shells and scuds aimed at Israel. None of this threatens America at all. If you would actually research this stuff instead of getting wasted and beating your chest like King Kong, maybe you would learn something about what's really going on..

When Bush says, "Syria has chemical weapons" read between the lines...what he means is "Syria has chemical weapons which threaten Israel."

When Bush says, "Syria is the home of terrorist groups" what he means is "Syria is the home of groups that threaten Israel."

You are a typical lemming in that you lack any elaborate DETAIL or awareness of the finer points of global politics.

You have more passion than INSIGHT

See: http://www.joevialls.co.uk/subliminalsuggestion/oil2.html

From a military point of view Syria is far more of a threat to Israel as they have more tanks, palnes etc. But Iran would be more fanatical with their resistance in that there would be dozens of suicide bombing every week in Iran not the odd few like in Iraq. Syria is right next to Israel so they could strike back against the jews when they liked.

[QUOTE=Dethicus]camel fucking carpet jockey sand nigger dune coons in valhalla? no thanks.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, they'd be asking for their promised virgins too.

Not OURS!!!

That is true.

Here is a good article to compliment your post. Dethicus, take notice.




[size=1][color=slategray]Bush Blows It Again
[/color][/size][size=1][color=slategray]by Charley Reese[/color][/size]





[size=1][color=slategray]President George W. Bush continues to mislead the American people as to the cause of terrorism directed against the United States. [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]This week he guaranteed that more Americans will die from terrorist attacks due to his stabbing the Palestinians in the back. He has from the beginning acted as if he were a ventriloquist's dummy and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon were the ventriloquist. [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]He proved it again by buying into Sharon's scheme to steal great globs of Palestinian land in the West Bank, and by arrogantly denying the right of Palestinian refugees to return home or be compensated. Israel has no legal right to the land occupied by settlements; the whole world recognizes this and has for decades. The United States used to recognize it until Bush decided to kiss the most ample part of Sharon's anatomy. [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]How dare George Bush tell Palestinian refugees, ethnically cleansed in 1947–48 and again in 1967, that they have no rights? What unmitigated gall and arrogance he shows, what contempt for the Palestinians and indeed for the whole Muslim world. When did God give George Bush the power to abolish the human rights of other people? [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]It's no wonder he has to lie through his teeth to try to explain terrorism. We are not victims of terrorism because terrorists hate us or democracy or freedom. We are victims of terrorism because George Bush's policies inflict grievous harm on Palestinians, on Afghans and on Iraqis. [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]One hates to say it, but Osama bin Laden makes more sense than Bush. If you doubt the role of our support for Israel's brutalizing Palestine in causing terrorism, listen to what bin Laden says: [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]"The greatest rule of safety is justice, and stopping injustice and aggression. It was said: Oppression kills the oppressors, and the hotbed of injustice is evil. The situation in occupied Palestine is an example. What happened on 11 September and 11 March (the Madrid bombings) is your commodity returned to you." [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]In plainer English, the more the Israelis shed Palestinian blood with our unadulterated support, the more of our blood bin Laden hopes to shed. He says quite plainly – addressing himself to the people instead of politicians – why don't you stop shedding our blood so we can stop shedding yours? [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]He scoffs at being called a terrorist and says, "Our acts are reaction to your own acts, which are represented by the destruction and killing of our kinfolk in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine." [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]He goes on to say that rational people would not sacrifice their security, their money and their children "to please the liar of the White House. Had he been truthful about his claim for peace, he would not describe the person who ripped open pregnant women in Sabra and Shatila (a reference to Sharon) and the destroyer of the capitulation process (a reference to the peace process) as a man of peace." [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]Bin Laden says further: "He also would not have lied to people and said that we hate freedom and kill for the sake of killing. Reality proves our truthfulness and his lie. The killing of Russians was after their invasion of Afghanistan and Chechnya; the killing of Europeans was after their invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan; and the killing of Americans on the day of New York was after their support of the Jews in Palestine and their invasion of the Arabian Peninsula." [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]As much as you might hate bin Laden, he is telling the truth about the cause of the conflict, and Bush is lying. [/color][/size]

[size=1][color=slategray]Bush ought to come clean and tell the American people the truth about why we are in this war instead of spreading the lie that we were just innocent bystanders picked on by madmen. Even terrorists have rational reasons for what they do. [/color][/size][size=1][color=slategray]Bush is following the Israeli example. Rather than address the cause of the problem, he just tries to kill his way out of it. That policy has failed the Israelis, and it will fail us. [/color][/size]