Hugh Lincoln
December 10th, 2006, 03:04 PM
NYT Jew Adam Nagourney's Week in Review cover piece this morning (Sun., Dec. 10th, 2006) is accompanied by a graphic depicting every president since George Washington, each stamped with "white male," the implication being that God, can't we can a Woman or Person of Color in the White House?
Graphic here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/weekinreview/10nagourney.html
IHT's run:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/10/news/presidents.php
It's a surprisingly thin piece by NYT standards, with a few quotes from the usual idiots. But imagine a huge graphic about, say, the NBA, with "black male" stuck under a series of stars, or better yet, Jew Jew Jew run under media figures.
A telling bit from the story:
Donna Brazile, a prominent Democratic strategist who is black, said that she had been deluged with e-mail messages from people looking to volunteer for Mr. Obama — and that most of the requests were from white voters.
Whites are like a bunch of schoolgirls when it comes to politics. "Are ya gonna vote for Britney? She's the prettiest!"
Graphic here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/weekinreview/10nagourney.html
IHT's run:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/10/news/presidents.php
It's a surprisingly thin piece by NYT standards, with a few quotes from the usual idiots. But imagine a huge graphic about, say, the NBA, with "black male" stuck under a series of stars, or better yet, Jew Jew Jew run under media figures.
A telling bit from the story:
Donna Brazile, a prominent Democratic strategist who is black, said that she had been deluged with e-mail messages from people looking to volunteer for Mr. Obama — and that most of the requests were from white voters.
Whites are like a bunch of schoolgirls when it comes to politics. "Are ya gonna vote for Britney? She's the prettiest!"