Log in

View Full Version : Afrocentrism is Mythology


Konrad Derbais
December 7th, 2008, 12:30 AM
Afrocentrism is a mythology created for the purpose of denigrating white people for the purpose of elevating black people. Aside from being factually wrong in almost every aspect it is a benign misinterpretation of history. A prime example the insane beliefs that there has been a conspriracy to keep the "true " racial idenity of the ancient Egyptians a secret. Afrocentrism is corrupting young blacks in America with stories and lies intended to create feeling of black pride and achievements that are totally false.

Luis Quilico
December 7th, 2008, 12:34 AM
Afrocentrism is corrupting young blacks in America with stories and lies intended to create feeling of black pride and achievements that are totally false.

Good. I expect them to fail, anyway.
You forgot to mention that Afrocentrism is also extremely entertaining.

MikeTodd
December 7th, 2008, 07:58 AM
a conspriracy to keep the "true " racial idenity of the ancient Egyptians a secret.OUCH!
Way to go, blabbermouth!:(
What are you going to do for an encore?
Show the jews where we've hidden the "real" gas chambers!:rolleyes:

Konrad Derbais
December 7th, 2008, 01:26 PM
OUCH!
Way to go, blabbermouth!:(
What are you going to do for an encore?
Show the jews where we've hidden the "real" gas chambers!:rolleyes:
I'm here to expose the Jew and other enemies of the white race,not to engage in childish,silly remarks.

MikeTodd
December 7th, 2008, 02:41 PM
Pull the needle out of your rectum and lighten the fuck up, Konrad!
You ain't the be-all and end-all of anti-semitism, y'know.
BTW, I'll say whatever the fuck I want, whenever the fuck I want, wherever the fuck I want!
And if you don't like it you can kiss my fat, white, ass at high noon on Times square!
Get it, got it, GOOD!
Now, good day to you, sir!

Konrad Derbais
December 7th, 2008, 04:04 PM
Pull the needle out of your rectum and lighten the fuck up, Konrad!
You ain't the be-all and end-all of anti-semitism, y'know.
BTW, I'll say whatever the fuck I want, whenever the fuck I want, wherever the fuck I want!
And if you don't like it you can kiss my fat, white, ass at high noon on Times square!
Get it, got it, GOOD!
Now, good day to you, sir! Please,please don't hurt me with such an epic premise. Good day to you as well,sir!

psychologicalshock
December 7th, 2008, 04:09 PM
Hey why attack the guy? He seems good, what he said is true but its not as if negroes will ever follow that advice. They'd prefer to live in an imaginary dream where they are actually capable of basic functions.

MikeTodd
December 7th, 2008, 04:43 PM
They'd prefer to live in an imaginary dream where they are actually capable of basic functions.
I thought in my original post (#3) the sarcastic humor I employed would have been understood by most readers.
I was using the needle to poke a hole in the jew/niggers overly inflated balloon of self importance and point out their paranoia extremis.
I never imagined that KD would take it as anything other than being supportive of his threadstarter.
Yes, I was trying to be funny, that is because I find humor to be a wonderful glue to make a point stick in people's minds.
I don't wish to get off on the wrong foot with you, Konrad (May I call you Konrad? Good.), but you obviously misread my intentions and for that I apologize, however, I will never apologize or retract any mockery or mirth I make at the expense of our enemies, and if you think that is childish or silly, so be it.

Konrad Derbais
December 7th, 2008, 05:44 PM
I thought in my original post (#3) the sarcastic humor I employed would have been understood by most readers.
I was using the needle to poke a hole in the jew/niggers overly inflated balloon of self importance and point out their paranoia extremis.
I never imagined that KD would take it as anything other than being supportive of his threadstarter.
Yes, I was trying to be funny, that is because I find humor to be a wonderful glue to make a point stick in people's minds.
I don't wish to get off on the wrong foot with you, Konrad (May I call you Konrad? Good.), but you obviously misread my intentions and for that I apologize, however, I will never apologize or retract any mockery or mirth I make at the expense of our enemies, and if you think that is childish or silly, so be it. Mike,Yes you can call me Konrad. I do accept your apology and now understand your point of view with full agreement.

Hochwald
December 12th, 2008, 06:07 PM
Afrocentrism is a shit as well as any other nigger folklore... I don't give a damn for niggers of all kinds, I ever don't think of niggers as regular people... they're just primitive sex-driven subhumans.

Mack Bartlow
December 17th, 2008, 01:53 PM
Afrocentrism is a mythology created for the purpose of denigrating white people for the purpose of elevating black people. Aside from being factually wrong in almost every aspect it is a benign misinterpretation of history. A prime example the insane beliefs that there has been a conspriracy to keep the "true " racial idenity of the ancient Egyptians a secret. Afrocentrism is corrupting young blacks in America with stories and lies intended to create feeling of black pride and achievements that are totally false.

Yet none of them move back to Africa.

Brad
December 17th, 2008, 02:33 PM
I'm here to expose the Jew and other enemies of the white race,not to engage in childish,silly remarks.

Our saviour has finally arrived!

as humorless as he is badass.

Konrad Derbais
December 18th, 2008, 03:32 AM
Our saviour has finally arrived!

as humorless as he is badass.

So you decided to hurl a senseless flame at a newbie,huh? I wouldn't be your "saviour" if you were choking to death on a big fat nigger dick.

Mike Jahn
December 18th, 2008, 03:36 AM
In the 1950's the United Nations began a campaign to improve the intellectual and cultural perception of Africa in the eyes of the rest of the world. The best way to fight against these lies is to automatically resist/reject anything you hear about Africa which doesn't sound right to you

elbwgreez
December 18th, 2008, 03:51 AM
Africans have found their equivalent in ants. No offense meant to ants that might read this.

Larry Heinberg
January 30th, 2009, 08:13 PM
Afrocentrism is a mythology created for the purpose of denigrating white people for the purpose of elevating black people. Aside from being factually wrong in almost every aspect it is a benign misinterpretation of history. A prime example the insane beliefs that there has been a conspriracy to keep the "true " racial idenity of the ancient Egyptians a secret. Afrocentrism is corrupting young blacks in America with stories and lies intended to create feeling of black pride and achievements that are totally false.

Well, racial pride is as foolish as pride in ones ancestors or ones country.

How can one use the circumstances of his or her birth to assert superiority? It's like taking credit for winning a lottery.

It's alright to admire the achievements of your country or ancestors, but to use them as a positive reflection on yourself? Totally illogical.

BryanVP
February 4th, 2009, 05:23 PM
Well, racial pride is as foolish as pride in ones ancestors or ones country.

How can one use the circumstances of his or her birth to assert superiority? It's like taking credit for winning a lottery.

It's alright to admire the achievements of your country or ancestors, but to use them as a positive reflection on yourself? Totally illogical.

That's what the ADL, and countless other kike organizations are all about. The lie that they are gods chosen race, and a little better than everyone else. Disagreeing with this bogus opinion is automatically deemed anti semitism.

The only thing illogical is the way white people support you hook nosed, swine.

If white people are so inferior, then why have your ancestors spent years trying to race mix with us in an attempt to make their children pass off as white?

psychologicalshock
February 4th, 2009, 05:56 PM
Well, racial pride is as foolish as pride in ones ancestors or ones country.
You might be a believer of individualism but how can individual achievement be accomplished without a medium to work on or a medium to create the individual? One is a creation of one's society and society is a creation of one's genes , the two are completely interconnected. It's as easy to be proud of one's creator as it is to be of one's creation. Your nihilistic ideology suggests one shouldn't be proud of one's parents since they were after all supposedly randomly selected (A complete stupid lie you pulled out of your ass). Your ideology suggests that one should be proud of nothing but one self, but the values by which you perceive value is instilled by your culture, your race, if you do not value this culture then you by default do not appreciate its values. If you do not appreciate its values you are worthless to yourself. You're a worthless, meaningless arrangement of organs which ultimately has no value and would be as good dead as it is alive. Of course that is only on the basis of cultural value, when it comes to the base desire to live, well one doesn't need any reasons for that. If we were all lead by pure rationale I think Jews and Shabbos goy would have long canceled themselves.

This is of course natural for someone who is an addict of post modernism and media which aims to destroy culture.


How can one use the circumstances of his or her birth to assert superiority? It's like taking credit for winning a lottery.

How can you assert that it's a random event? It's completely illogical for you to say that.

I can only be what I am, it's impossible to be otherwise. There was never any chance involved, the moment the gametes that created me were formed I was to be what I am. There is 0% chance for me to be anything but what I am. If any other person was to be formed in that embryo it would no longer be me and thus its impossible to be anything but what I am.

Fail.


It's alright to admire the achievements of your country or ancestors, but to use them as a positive reflection on yourself? Totally illogical.
That is your judgment which is completely irrelevant as I have already proven that you are a nihilist and thus by default values are something you'd deny as having any relevance. Thus it's easy to brush you off as irrelevant when it comes to cultural values.

Karl Von Clausewitz!
February 4th, 2009, 06:00 PM
You might be a believer of individualism but how can individual achievement be accomplished without a medium to work on or a medium to create the individual? One is a creation of one's society and society is a creation of one's genes , the two are completely interconnected. It's as easy to be proud of one's creator as it is to be of one's creation. Your nihilistic ideology suggests one shouldn't be proud of one's parents since they were after all supposedly randomly selected (A complete stupid lie you pulled out of your ass). Your ideology suggests that one should be proud of nothing but one self, but the values by which you perceive value is instilled by your culture, your race, if you do not value this culture then you by default do not appreciate its values. If you do not appreciate its values you are worthless to yourself. You're a worthless, meaningless arrangement of organs which ultimately has no value and would be as good dead as it is alive. Of course that is only on the basis of cultural value, when it comes to the base desire to live, well one doesn't need any reasons for that. If we were all lead by pure rationale I think Jews and Shabbos goy would have long canceled themselves.

This is of course natural for someone who is an addict of post modernism and media which aims to destroy culture.

How can you assert that it's a random event? It's completely illogical for you to say that.

I can only be what I am, it's impossible to be otherwise. There was never any chance involved, the moment the gametes that created me were formed I was to be what I am. There is 0% chance for me to be anything but what I am. If any other person was to be formed in that embryo it would no longer be me and thus its impossible to be anything but what I am.

Fail.

That is your judgment which is completely irrelevant as I have already proven that you are a nihilist and thus by default values are something you'd deny as having any relevance. Thus it's easy to brush you off as irrelevant when it comes to cultural values.

I love how this jew shows his stupidity, despite trying his best to cloak it under a veil of half-sophistication, you have shown the sophistry of his statements.

Brilliant post.

Karl Lueger
February 4th, 2009, 08:10 PM
Africans have found their equivalent in ants. No offense meant to ants that might read this.

NO WAY!!
Ants have functional societies and serve a purpose,
niggers have neither...:D

any ant does more in a day than any nigger..c'mon people, go easy on insulting comparisons..

ofcourse "afro-centrism" is funny..niggers flying around pyramids they just built,
"advancing" societies of other Races..[we subsequently "stole" that knowledge..:rolleyes:]

in similar style, nigger 'must' have built Great Wall of China,
hidden Atlantis form us and visited the moon first,
while White were only getting far as North America.:p

the doctrine of eternal amusement from Elijah Poole,
aka, Elijah Muhammed, Messenger of Allah,
and Divine Leader of the Lost-Found Nation of Islam:

"When, in accordance with the will of Allah,
the earth was separated from the moon by an explosion in year 65,999,999,998,062 B.C.,
there appeared on the planet the Black Race, as black and perfect as God Himself.
For almost sixty-six trillion years those perfect beings dwelt in perfect happiness, speaking Arabic and
evidently leading the joyous and unfettered life now to be found in the jungles of the Congo.
The universal bliss was troubled, however, in 4707 B.C., when a "Black scientist" named Yakub
determined to create, artificially, a race of debased and inferior creatures.
He worked steadily for six hundred years, and finally, by "grafting" and "rigid birth control,"
he produced the "blue-eyed devils," i.e., White men,
who are physically weak and totally evil.

Allah, for purposes of his own, and intending the ultimate exaltation of his Chosen People, who are the only true human beings,
permitted the white devils to interfere with nature and set up the nasty thing called civilization.
He even permitted the vile "spooks" to dominate and enslave the Chosen People by devising the "devil-doctrine" called Christianity.
He decreed, however, that the white swine were to rule the world for exactly six thousand years.
Their time was up in 1914. But there are now enjoying a few "years of grace" until the Black Man can rise
and exterminate them from the face of the earth and come into his own again."
Of this there can be no doubt, no possible doubt whatever,
because "all history" has been "written in advance by 24 Black Scientists."

pretty funny from a Race that never took-the evolutionary step into fully Sapient..:D

The Barrenness
February 4th, 2009, 11:41 PM
Well, racial pride is as foolish as pride in ones ancestors or ones country.

How can one use the circumstances of his or her birth to assert superiority? It's like taking credit for winning a lottery.

It's alright to admire the achievements of your country or ancestors, but to use them as a positive reflection on yourself? Totally illogical.

If one admires, sees good,etc. in the achievements of their ancestors, people, and country, then it is perfectly logical that this person would concern themselves with their preservation, correct?

The Barrenness
February 4th, 2009, 11:45 PM
That's what the ADL, and countless other kike organizations are all about. The lie that they are gods chosen race, and a little better than everyone else. Disagreeing with this bogus opinion is automatically deemed anti semitism.

The only thing illogical is the way white people support you hook nosed, swine.

If white people are so inferior, then why have your ancestors spent years trying to race mix with us in an attempt to make their children pass off as white?


Yes, such people will tell you, just as this guy does, that it is silly and illogical to take pride in the deeds of your ancestors and then they will turn around and say you must feel guilt and atone for the what they chose to label the "bad" deeds of your ancestors. That kind of double think is illogical.

Try to rationalize that one for me, Larry.

Let's take the Germans as an example. If every individual German is basically nothing more than an accident of birth who would be completely foolish for taking any kind of collective pride in the achievements of those who came before them, then they also should not be forced into this neverending guilt about any supposed deeds of those who came before them. Deeds you people keep using to bleed them. Agreed?

Larry Heinberg
February 6th, 2009, 08:05 AM
If one admires, sees good,etc. in the achievements of their ancestors, people, and country, then it is perfectly logical that this person would concern themselves with their preservation, correct?
Yes I suppose, though I'm not sure what you take that to mean.

Yes, such people will tell you, just as this guy does, that it is silly and illogical to take pride in the deeds of your ancestors and then they will turn around and say you must feel guilt and atone for the what they chose to label the "bad" deeds of your ancestors. That kind of double think is illogical.

Try to rationalize that one for me, Larry.

Let's take the Germans as an example. If every individual German is basically nothing more than an accident of birth who would be completely foolish for taking any kind of collective pride in the achievements of those who came before them, then they also should not be forced into this neverending guilt about any supposed deeds of those who came before them. *snip* Agreed?
Absolutely!

The German people living today should be considered in no way responsible. (The same more or less applies to most Germans living at the time for that matter.)

As I see it, the difficulties here arise when modern people are profiting from the crimes of their ancestors. I don't know how to resolve that, since modern people mostly enter such profitable situations by luck, and don't deliberately exploit past crimes.

The descendants of colonists are an example of this.

Deeds you people keep using to bleed them.
Ha, don't you think this is a little inconsistent? You say people can't inherit guilt, but then imply that I'm guilty for the actions of others of "my" race.

(I'm actually British by blood, and certainly not a Jew by religion haha).

Karl Von Clausewitz!
February 6th, 2009, 11:34 AM
The descendants of colonists are an example of this.

Kaffirs should thank us for colonialism, if not for it, they'd have gone to near extinction by now. Do you know what the life expectancy is for a "free" negro in Africa? 40, perhaps 50 at most in certain places. Do you know what the life expectancy of a nigger was during the "oppressed" colonial days? 65, a mere 10 years below that of a European.

We brought them cures to their disease, we brought them mass farming, we brought them well structured housing, the list is endless, Colonial Africa should thank us for the gifts we have given them, they should fall down on their starved little knee caps and thank us for ensuring their survival.

I hate colonialism only for that reason, it prevented nature from taking it's course.

Larry Heinberg
February 6th, 2009, 07:13 PM
Aah, what are you replying to?

Karl Von Clausewitz!
February 6th, 2009, 10:12 PM
Aah, what are you replying to?

Your preposterous claim that colonial descendants benefited from crimes committed against Africans. I don't think I need to delve into the rather obvious fact that a very limited amount of people were actually "rich", the only thing worth addressing is the claim of crimes and profiteering as a result of alleged crimes.

But then again you knew this, you just have no response to the facts regarding the matter. When you feel the need to make bold claims regarding matters, it's advisable that you consult material that extends beyond your rudimentary knowledge you gained from high-school, just some advice for you to consider.

Larry Heinberg
February 7th, 2009, 08:18 AM
Your preposterous claim that colonial descendants benefited from crimes committed against Africans.
I made no such claim.

By "colonists" I meant any colonising group. I certainly wasn't talking about Africa in particular.

Karl Von Clausewitz!
February 9th, 2009, 03:48 AM
I made no such claim.


As I see it, the difficulties here arise when modern people are profiting from the crimes of their ancestors. I don't know how to resolve that, since modern people mostly enter such profitable situations by luck, and don't deliberately exploit past crimes.

The descendants of colonists are an example of this.

Not only foolish but a liar too, you made such a claim. Several African nations were colonies, whether you physically said Africa or not is of no real relevance. Several of it's nations were colonies before. If you had not specifically meant Africa you'd have specifically stated "excluding Africa"...your accusation included the region. I am privy to select which colonies I wish as you left it open to my choosing.

Larry Heinberg
February 9th, 2009, 10:13 PM
You're "privy to" mistake my meaning, yes.

Given that I agreed that racial guilt is unreasonable, I'm not sure what you're problem is.

Sándor Petőfi
February 14th, 2009, 11:31 AM
As I see it, the difficulties here arise when modern people are profiting from the crimes of their ancestors.

An act is a crime if there exists a law making it so at the time and place it is carried out.

Larry Heinberg
February 15th, 2009, 08:34 PM
Oh, not again.

Obviously I meant "crime" in a broader sense.

And I wasn't referring to a specific case.

Sándor Petőfi
February 16th, 2009, 07:19 AM
Oh, not again.

Obviously I meant "crime" in a broader sense.

And I wasn't referring to a specific case.

"Broader sense" .i.e. you're using "crime" in a polemical manner to cast moral judgements and make them appear objective. Why don't you stop pretending and just say "sins of the fathers"?

Larry Heinberg
February 16th, 2009, 08:09 AM
No you noob haha. I hope you're doing this deliberately.

If I kill someone and steal his fortune, then pass it on to my children who (unknowingly) spend it to live well, are they guilty? I'd say not, but it's a tricky situation.

That's all I said. You may now die.

Sándor Petőfi
February 17th, 2009, 11:21 AM
No you noob haha.

Whatever.

I hope you're doing this deliberately.

I'm deliberately showing you to be the fool you are.

If I kill someone and steal his fortune, then pass it on to my children who (unknowingly) spend it to live well, are they guilty?

Guilty of what?

I'd say not, but it's a tricky situation.


Not at all. There is a definite truth value to the proposition they are guilty of a crime depending on how one has defined guilt and crime. It's only "tricky" for fools such as you because, like all moralists, you use the words without ascribing to them any definite meaning i.e. giving the conditions under which the proposition would be true or false, and at the same time expecting it to have some truth in an absolute, universal sense irrespective of the arbitrary definition upon which these truth values depends.

That's all I said. You may now die.

Look, the humanitarian is about to throw a temper tantrum.

Larry Heinberg
February 20th, 2009, 01:15 AM
It's only "tricky" for fools such as you because, like all moralists, you use the words without ascribing to them any definite meaning i.e. giving the conditions under which the proposition would be true or false, and at the same time expecting it to have some truth in an absolute, universal sense irrespective of the arbitrary definition upon which these truth values depends.

Can't you leave your useless generalisations behind for a change?

All I'm saying (if you could take 10 seconds to use a productive approach) is that I can see why people gravitate to the idea of heritable guilt, even if it's a very flawed idea.

There's only so much good to be done by constantly giving your "opponents" an extreme categorisation (e.g., saying "fools such as you" to them). No gain comes from that, except for some perceived "victory" for one side (or in fact both).

Also, it's frankly laughable that you say I'm having a tantrum when I make a flippant remark. You've been abusing me non-stop, a tactic whose use is so limited that I can only assume it comes from anger or the desire to satisfy aggressive impulses.

J.Bowman
October 7th, 2009, 04:42 AM
I have read that niggers have claimed that they were the ancient Greeks and Romans

Kajtimar
June 17th, 2010, 08:23 AM
Subhuman niggers claim everything nowadays.

We offered them a finger and they grabbed the whole arm.

To them everything is "black" if it only has a very small percentage of nigger genes. They would call Pushkin "black", haha.