[One little accurate remark, that Obama hates white people, and Beck loses 20 advertisers.]

Will Glenn Beck Go the Way of Imus?
Posted by Karen De Coster on August 19, 2009 11:07 AM

The stories of Glenn Beck boycotts have been picking up steam. Companies boycotting Beck – for his anti-Obama remarks – are CVS, Travelocity, Best Buy, GEICO, ConAgra, Radio Shack, Men’s Wearhouse, State Farm, Proctor & Gamble, Sargento, Wal-Mart, and the bailed-out GMAC Financial Services. Wal-Mart, following its support of government-run health care for the purpose of hurting its competitors, is now firmly in the regime camp. There’s some amazing stuff on the DailyDish regarding this boycott. Conor Clarke says:

As you probably know, Fox host Glenn Beck has been losing lots of advertisers – about 20 so far, including Wal-Mart, CVS and GEICO — for calling Barack Obama a “racist” with a “deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture.” I clicked around to see what people on the right were saying about the donnybrook, and found this page from RedState.org, which appears to be organizing a counter boycott, or is at least offering the sinister warning that “there will be repercussions from our side if [these companies] are so willing to become pawns of the left.”

…And yet I cannot help but think there is a crucial difference between GEICO’s decision to drop Glenn Beck and RedState’s decision to drop GEICO. The difference is this: Wal-Mart has a good reason to boycott Beck, because Beck actually did something idiotic and indefensible. It simply is not true that Obama is a racist. And what’s this business about “the white culture,” anyway? Tell us a bit more about that, Glenn.

RedState does not have a similarly reasonable claim — or a substantive argument at all — unless they are seriously interested in defending what Beck said on the merits. (Are they? Is anyone? Let’s have that argument, pretty please.) The argument for boycotting the boycotters should be more than “free speech is awesome,” since the right to free speech doesn’t guarantee you the right to massive corporate underwriting.

Hey Conor, free speech is sure awesome when, on the left, any resistance to oppressive and unwanted socialist government programs is deemed, without proof, question, or logic, to be “racism” on the part of a bunch of white (and black) people who are said to be resisting because they despise the fact that a black man is president. Any and all resistance to the federal government’s horde of new policies, programs, and attempts at socialization are all said to be based in “racist attitudes” from white folks in white hoods. (These are many of the same people that voted for the president.)

As this story reports, a black political organization, Color of Change (”changing the color of democracy”), is behind the boycott. What is so special about this organization? The American Spectator spells it out. Over time, Beck has taken several jabs at Van Jones, Obama’s (black) Green Czar, just as he has at all of the regime’s Czars, as well as the whole concept of the government’s unelected, unaccountable Czars. Jones is an avowed Communist, by the way, which makes him a special target for Beck. TheSpectator reports:

Jones is a founding board member of Color of Change, but Color of Change doesn’t want you to know that. Maybe having an avowed America-hating radical on the group’s board is bad public relations.

The group deleted references to Jones on its “about” page. That page used to say, “James Rucker and Van Jones came together in the wake of [Hurricane] Katrina to use the organizing power of the Internet to give Black Americans and our allies a renewed and strengthened political voice.”

But now it doesn’t.

Read the rest of the Spectator story.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/33490.html#more-33490

And what’s this business about “the white culture,” anyway?

(lol) wow what a traitor. Doesn't even realize the country she's in IS white culture. Last I checked niggers didn't create the country or fight a war against England. Just love how the so called "left" keeps denying their heritage. It's even funnier how people can honestly believe "Lincoln" actually wanted to let African foreigners become citizens of a white nation. What a bunch of dribble. Power to Beck. Speak out for your people, the American people.

This story is funny in a way. People like Beck are always defending these transnational corporations and chamber of commerce types as a bulkward of capitalism and how is he rewarded? These transnationals allow a collection of leftists to influence them into dumping him. This reaffirms what I've said for years about the sainted "business community" these guys defend; that they are stupid, greedy and cowardly with no principles, only a concern for the bottom line.

http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/showpost.php?p=71883&postcount=2

Corporations are part of the corporate state. They are also extensions of jewish counterfeiting. That is, corporations are jewish. This is jewish fascism.

That shows you how powerful the left is and why the more conservative media appears to be so damn timid. If any large media conglomerate started to stand up for white rights it would be bankrupt in no time flat because corporations would instantly stop buying advertizing. It´s fucked that nothing seems to work for the right, remember when Ford started advertising in fag magazines, did the family organizations ever succeed with their boycott calls?

That shows you how powerful the left is and why the more conservative media appears to be so damn timid. If any large media conglomerate started to stand up for white rights it would be bankrupt in no time flat because corporations would instantly stop buying advertizing. It´s fucked that nothing seems to work for the right, remember when Ford started advertising in fag magazines, did the family organizations ever succeed with their boycott calls?

So many people are telewitz-addicted it isn't surprising to see how boycotts fail.

The conservative populace-despite its protestations about "cultural decline" and "Hollywood filth"-almost universally sends a check to hymie every month to support the jews' primary means of White annihilation-cable TV. The notion of such a populace being willing to reduce/alter their material consumption in any meaningful manner via boycott is sadly humorous.

I wonder what the percentage of those who post on this site is who subscribe to cable and attend first run Hoolywood productions? I suspect that it is alarmingly high.

If we who know about the jew don't strop filling his coffers, how in the world can we expect anyone else to alter their purchasing habits?

Glenn Beck is a young Pat Buchanan. Fuck him.

I actually emailed him once referencing his "zionist masters" which he spoofed the following Monday as if only tards believe in zionist kike mayhem and etc.

Beck is trying to recreate 1950s America but with niggers, spics and jews aplenty thrown in.

He never runs a show without mentioning the holohoax, jews in ovens or something about Nazis.

Glenn is a shabbos and a lot of jews are going Obama's way which means that neoconservative guys like Beck are out of chairs and the music has stopped.

Maybe this will refocus Beck a bit.

A lot of WN's have issues with Beck and FoxNews but I think this issue is larger than that. Beck is having sponsors drop him just because he thinks that Obama hates whites and white culture. I don't think his statement is that outrageous. In fact, I think there is plenty of evidence to back it up. What is Obama some type of diety that no one can be critical of him?

Corporations are so pathetically reactive to any perceived slight of any protected "minority" that Beck's difficulties are easy to understand. I don't know much about Beck. I listened to him a few times and was underwhelmed. My perception of him is that he's a Limbaugh with a more outlandish style.

Try to have a meaningful political discussion with any management type in a big company. I live amongst the "Proctoids" (Proctor & Gamble employees). White collar managers with this company are among the most cowardly Whites whom I have ever seen. I have never heard a single Proctoid say anything about politics with even a smidgeon of originality or passion. They simply remain silent or smugly utter pc cliches when politics come up. They are a pliant and subservient lot. The shekels uber alles crowd, they are.

So, it shouldn't come as any surprise that Beck's sponsorship has been savaged by the mealy-mouthed, cowardly shabbos goy of corporate kwa. Most of these fuckers wouldn't defend their own families against a nigger attack. Most of them will need severe re-education when (if) the time comes.

A lot of WN's have issues with Beck and FoxNews but I think this issue is larger than that. Beck is having sponsors drop him just because he thinks that Obama hates whites and white culture. I don't think his statement is that outrageous. In fact, I think there is plenty of evidence to back it up. What is Obama some type of diety that no one can be critical of him?

No, his statements are true. He is still a shabbos, though. Callers have tried to bring up USS Liberty on his show before. He won't take up the issue.

As I said, he doesn't miss a day without something on the holohoax, etc. Nazis, ovens cooking juden.

Jews are backing the left. Beck lost. His usefulness as a shabbos is going by the wayside.



My local station carries him and I do listen while driving. Sometimes his crap is so infuriating and nauseating that I have to turn it off. That's how stupid he can be in dealing with real issues.

When we think of Alex's recent thread on destroying conservatives, Beck is a prime example of who needs to go. Only Sean Hannity is worse.

EDIT: Beck also has a big ego, so don't be surprised if he not only reads this but mentions it later. He mentioned my talking about his zionist masters on an obscure blog. So, at the least, VNN might get some attention which would be the best thing that Beck has done so far.

This is maddening. It is like everyone is tryong to outdo the next guy in destroying white people for fun and profit. It is time for us to start forming corporations and profitable business of our own. As far as I am concerned it is the only way. The golden rule - those who have the gold make the rules.

Anyone who goes against the race or holds their own personal interests over the race should be the litmus test for expulsion from white countries. I don't care about your drug use, shoe fetish or wacky religious belief as long as it does not make us the enemy or ekwuls.

My point was certainly not to defend Beck, whom I can't stand, just to point out corporate cowardice. They'll divorce from truthful statements touching on race, but stick with people like Vick who've committed nasty crimes.

No, his statements are true. He is still a shabbos, though. Callers have tried to bring up USS Liberty on his show before. He won't take up the issue.

As I said, he doesn't miss a day without something on the holohoax, etc. Nazis, ovens cooking juden.

I rarely listen to Beck. There is something that seems "off" about the guy. I think he's probably a manic-depressive.

I know what you mean about Hannity, but he's been doing some good work on creating opposition to Obamacare. His radio show is awful, however.

I'm in the car about half the workday so I listen to a lot of talk radio. I think Limbaugh has gotten better now that Bush is out of office. I like the Laura Ingraham show quite a bit. She's got a biting wit I find unique. In the afternoon I listen to local paleo out of Baltimore.

Admittingly I'm a bit more "moderate" as opposed to VNN ideology.

I rarely listen to Beck. There is something that seems "off" about the guy. I think he's probably a manic-depressive.

He says he was an ADD kid. Probably an ADD adult, alcoholic and even went on the air in tears talking about his surgery for hemorrhoids.

I know what you mean about Hannity, but he's been doing some good work on creating opposition to Obamacare. His radio show is awful, however.

Hannity's arguments and use of tautology are juvenile and easily bested. They must really screen the opposition callers because they tend to be college age White kids, muds and more nigger illiterates than I have ever heard on a call in show before.

I won't fault him on building opposition to Obama because I believe that increases racial tensions, which is good for our side. I have yet to see any niggers at the tea parties or town hall protests.

I'm in the car about half the workday so I listen to a lot of talk radio. I think Limbaugh has gotten better now that Bush is out of office. I like the Laura Ingraham show quite a bit. She's got a biting wit I find unique. In the afternoon I listen to local paleo out of Baltimore.


I have to drive from job to job, so I spend a lot of time in my vehicle, too. Choices are the local metal station that plays the same 20 year old and older tunes, "hit country" (twenty song rotating playlist), jew NPR, nigger/wigger music, or talk radio. I pick the talk station because it at least makes you exercise your brain some, no matter what we think of these shabbos hosts.

Limbaugh is out for Limbaugh and he won't be critical of jews too much, though he has made a few comments. He has a good grasp of the left and what they will do next. He does get that right. As far as Bush being out of office, Rush denied that the economy was in trouble until Obama got into office. He is definitely better when the opposition to him is in power. The parody songs are funny, too.


Admittingly I'm a bit more "moderate" as opposed to VNN ideology.

Look out then, lol. Actually, I think that Alex has the idea that I am a "moderate racist" and maybe I am. I have no problem with the expulsion or execution of jews, nonWhites, etc. and could be involved without a blink. I just have a more moderate stance in dealing with typical White kwans. They are still White, even if they are deluded. Six months without televitz and I believe they would be different people. For us to ever gain any kind of power we have to present solutions that appeal to a big swath of Whites. I think that Kievsky has the best ideas on how to do this.

Wal-Mart has a good reason to boycott Beck, because Beck actually did something idiotic and indefensible. It simply is not true that Obama is a racist. And what’s this business about “the white culture,” anyway? Tell us a bit more about that, Glenn.


yeah, you stupid bitch, he's not racist cuz he only hates white males.

This is the most fucked up thing in all the universe, all these stupid white bitches who play along and pretend to hate white males and their culture in order to appease niggers. these women should be waterboarded, flogged, pilloried, raped, sodomized, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, forever and ever.

Unfortunately their multitude are like the grains of sand on the Ocean,

Karen Decoster

http://mises.org/images/people/decoster_karen.jpg

what these ditzy bitches don't get is, when the nigger is pushin their stupid head into the pillow and fuckin their ass, what they're gettin off on is the thought of her father and brother and cousin and grandpa watchin their sister, daughter, granddaughter and MOTHER gettin fucked up the ass by his nigger cock, all niggers are sharing in the joy and triumph of humiliating all her white male relatives, and this bitch has taken an active participating role in it.

If anyone should understand the concept of honor killings by now, it's white males. It's just easier to kill the bitch than the nigger, girls should be taught though, it's not about what they want or feel, it's about them not hurting our sensitive feelings.

Corporations are part of the corporate state. They are also extensions of jewish counterfeiting. That is, corporations are jewish. This is jewish fascism.

"Jewish fascism" is an oxymoron.

I rarely listen to Beck. There is something that seems "off" about the guy. I think he's probably a manic-depressive.

I know what you mean about Hannity, but he's been doing some good work on creating opposition to Obamacare. His radio show is awful, however.

I'm in the car about half the workday so I listen to a lot of talk radio. I think Limbaugh has gotten better now that Bush is out of office. I like the Laura Ingraham show quite a bit. She's got a biting wit I find unique. In the afternoon I listen to local paleo out of Baltimore.

Admittingly I'm a bit more "moderate" as opposed to VNN ideology.

http://jewishworldreview.com/0209/ingraham.php3

That "biting wit" is called kikery.:jew:

'. . ."Jewish fascism" is an oxymoron. . .'

Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Yehezkel Dror's Defence of Jewish Fascism in the Forward

"Fascism" means many things to many people, and is, I grant, an overworked term. Leftists cry "fascist" so many times that it is hard to tell a real fascist when you see one. So for the purposes of this article, let me define "Jewish fascism" as a belief that the existence of a Jewish state trumps all values, especially moral ones; that individual and collective morality must be submerged to the interests of that state. In Zionist historiography, "Jewish fascism" is identified with the revisionists, but that is arguable. Jabotinsky, like so many others, often talked the fascist talk, but was ambivalent. Labor Zionists did not like to talk openly like Jabotinsky, since they were socialists, but their tactics confirmed his strategy. In recent years, Jewish fascism is associated with neocons like Poldheretz and Ruth Wisse, who opens her book on Jewish Power with a story implying that a live immoral Jew is better than a dead Jewish mensch, something that even Judah Halevy wouldn't have believed.

Yehezkel Dror, a professor emeritus of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and a recipient of the Israel Prize, has written a not-so-brilliant defence of Jewish Fascism in the Forward, of all places. The argument is a familiar one and contains the familiar elisions: the state of Israel = the Jewish people, so the survival of the former is the same as the survival of the latter, or at least a necessary condition. Dror doesn't even bother to raise the question whether the state of Israel is good for the survival of the Jews; he holds that truth to be self-evident. The fact that more Jews have died as Jews since 1945 because of the Jewish state than of any other cause doesn't faze him. The fact that not a single Jew has been rescued by the Jewish state that wasn't previously endangered by it doesn't cross his mind. He could argue, of course, that Jewish existence is more certain than it was a century ago. But he doesn't; he just takes it for granted.

But let's grant him the point that the survival of Israel = the survival of the Jews. The question is what can be done in order to ensure that survival? And it turns out that Dror, like many other intellectual fascists, wimps out at this point. He allows that it is legitimate to criticize policies of the state, so long as they are unreasonable, or do not advance the state's interests. Who is to judge what they are? Well, Dror, I suppose, and other like-minded individuals; certainly there is no good argument why Israeli-style democracy is essential for the survival of the state. A fundamentalist theocracy a la Iran would do just as well.

No, for Dror the issue is between realpolitik and liberal morality; chuck the latter, he says, in favor of the former. All right, in that case we have chucked neoconservatism and liberal interventionism, and we are back with Walt and Mearsheimer's thesis that US unlimited support for Israel is against the US interest. Look, I have no problem with realpolitik (sorry guys), but why say that it has anything to do with Judaism or with Jews? Once again, Dror has no argument for a liberal democratic state; he believes in it precisely because of the values with which he was inculcated.

Are state's moral agents? That is a long philosophical discussion that I can't go into. But whether they are or whether they are not, states that allow widespread immorality generally are not stable over time. If Dror wants to argue that liberal morality is in the Jewish state's interest (for one thing, it is a stabilizing factor, for another, it eases a small state like Israel's acceptance in the family of nations, that is one thing. And I imagine he would agree to that. But it is a sign of his intellectual poverty that he can't see that that conclusion is undermined by his main claim.

The truth is that folks like Dror, Podhoretz, and Wisse attempt to provide moral justifications for Israel's actions. When they think they can't, they resort to the Jewish Fascist strategy of Israel's "survival" trumping all considerations. The form of their argument is: either Israel's actions are moral, or morality doesn't count.

Of course, as I said, none of this has anything to do with Judaism. I suppose that it does have something to do with all those Jewish kings in the Bible who identified their own interest with the interest of their people, and were promptly disabused of that idea by the prophets. Prophetic Judaism doesn't count much with the Jewish fascists. Jewish fascism is the latest version of Jewish zealotry that goes back to Reuven and Shimon, who would massacre an entire people to avenge the lost honor of their sister Dina. For them, the clan's survival trumped all morality. To Azure's editor David Hazony, the brothers were just engaging in realpolitik.

My response -- the Jewish response -- is Israel's last word: Be-sodam al tavo nafshi. "I will not participate in their councils." Jewish zealotry is as Jewish as felafel, my favorite Palestinian dish.

http://themagneszionist.blogspot.com/2008/05/yehezkel-drors-defence-of-jewish.html

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jewish+fascism&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

yeah, you stupid bitch, he's not racist cuz he only hates white males.

This is the most fucked up thing in all the universe, all these stupid white bitches who play along and pretend to hate white males and their culture in order to appease niggers. these women should be waterboarded, flogged, pilloried, raped, sodomized, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, forever and ever.

Unfortunately their multitude are like the grains of sand on the Ocean,

Karen Decoster

http://mises.org/images/people/decoster_karen.jpg

I thought that was a quote from that Conor Clarke commie, which DeCoster was criticizing.

Am I missing something?