Re: [TSCM-L] Re: US firms gave spy agency records of billions of calls

From: James Greenwold <b..._at_charter.net>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:29:40 -0500

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:20 2024
Received: by 10.54.73.18 with SMTP id v18mr11570wra;
        Fri, 12 May 2006 05:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <d..._at_geer.org>
Received: from absinthe.tinho.net (absinthe.tinho.net [166.84.5.228])
        by mx.googlegroups.com with ESMTP id v11si2321491cwb.2006.05.12.05.29.41;
        Fri, 12 May 2006 05:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (googlegroups.com: 166.84.5.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of d..._at_geer.org)
Received: from absinthe.tinho.net (absinthe.tinho.net [166.84.5.228])
        by absinthe.tinho.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0AC1BF923;
        Fri, 12 May 2006 08:29:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: d..._at_geer.org
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
cc: johnma..._at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] US firms gave spy agency records of billions of calls
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 May 2006 09:25:42 +0200."
             <008b01c67595$d160b270$0d00000a_at_NewCompaq>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:29:41 -0400
Message-Id: <20060512122941.3A0AC1BF923_at_absinthe.tinho.net>


"A Grudko" writes:
 |
 | US firms gave spy agency records of billions of calls
 | ...


If I was AT&T/Verizon/Bell South (and those three are 90% of
all landlines), then I would very, very much prefer to just
give 'em all the records than have to make selective retrieval
of 5 cent transactions N years after the fact. My costs rise
in proportion to the specificity of the request, and fall on
the generality.

--dan
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:20 CST