US firms gave spy agency records of billions of calls

From: A Grudko <agr..._at_icon.co.za>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:25:42 +0200

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:20 2024
Received: by 10.54.131.14 with SMTP id e14mr27598wrd;
        Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <b..._at_charter.net>
Received: from mxsf10.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf10.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.210])
        by mx.googlegroups.com with ESMTP id v11si2522147cwb.2006.05.12.15.32.47;
        Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (googlegroups.com: domain of b..._at_charter.net designates 209.225.28.210 as permitted sender)
Received: from mxip35a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip35a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.250])
        by mxsf10.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4CMWkQe021604
        for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:32:46 -0400
Received: from 68-115-75-7.dhcp.eucl.wi.charter.com (HELO [68.115.75.7]) ([68.115.75.7])
  by mxip35a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 12 May 2006 18:32:47 -0400
User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:32:45 -0500
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] Re: US firms gave spy agency records of billions of
        calls
From: James Greenwold <b..._at_charter.net>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <C08A773D.179D4%bts_at_charter.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060512140733.0330E8043C6_at_trixter>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Interesting how you missed the point all together.

> From: "Trixter aka Bret McDanel" <tri..._at_0xdecafbad.com>
> Reply-To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:07:44 -0700
> To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
> Subject: [TSCM-L] Re: US firms gave spy agency records of billions of calls
>
>
>
>
>> The arguement made by the administration is that gathering the numbers is
>> not as invasive as gathering the names and addresses.
>>
> I thought that the courts made that argument and the current and previous
> administrations were only defering to the courts and the legislative branches
> prior decisions.
>
>
>> What I do have a problem with, is the recent laws against letting license
>> professional investigators whom have proven identity and signed
>> authorization forms and are not misusing the information, access the same
>> data. They have stopped us accessing the phone records, saying that it is
>> an invasion of privacy.
>>
>
> That is covered under statute, one proposed and passed by congress. If you
> want that changed write your congressman. Blaming the current administration
> when they have no say seems a bit odd.
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:20 CST