>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:23 2024
Received: by 10.224.201.7 with SMTP id ey7mr2090501qab.0.1333901626202;
Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.229.53.77 with SMTP id l13ls3234655qcg.6.gmail; Sun, 08 Apr
2012 09:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.184.137 with SMTP id ck9mr2087115qab.1.1333901622060;
Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.184.137 with SMTP id ck9mr2087113qab.1.1333901622042;
Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <ber..._at_netaxs.com>
Received: from newmx4.fast.net (newmx4.fast.net. [209.92.1.39])
by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id d8si3260758qcu.1.2012.04.08.09.13.41;
Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.92.1.39 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ber..._at_netaxs.com) client-ip=209.92.1.39;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.92.1.39 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ber..._at_netaxs.com) smtp.mail=ber..._at_netaxs.com
Message-Id: <4f81b935.488be50a.155a.250bSMTPIN_ADDED_at_gmr-mx.google.com>
Received: (qmail 4120 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2012 16:13:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO NTR71408.netaxs.com) ([184.77.172.170]) (envelope-sender <ber..._at_netaxs.com>)
by newmx4.fast.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>; 8 Apr 2012 16:13:41 -0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:13:36 -0400
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
From: bernieS <ber..._at_netaxs.com>
Subject: RE: [TSCM-L] {6084}
In-Reply-To: <SNT107-W526481A2D1576C13E8C0DFBC360_at_phx.gbl>
References: <SNT107-W842E23288AEF0A4E8827BBC360_at_phx.gbl>
<4f81a4ad.567ee50a.786d.207eSMTPIN_ADDED_at_gmr-mx.google.com>
<SNT107-W526481A2D1576C13E8C0DFBC360_at_phx.gbl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=====================_307157028==.ALT"
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120408-0, 04/08/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
--=====================_307157028==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As I previously pointed out, there is no TV=20
Channel 1 (and there hasn't been for about 66=20
years.) As for so-called white-space on unused=20
TV broadcast frequencies, some eavesdroppers have=20
used those same frequencies for bugs for several=20
decades--and new FCC rulings won't change that.
Happy Easter, everyone..
At 11:51 AM 4/8/2012, Onionbreath wrote:
>For those who CLEARLY UNDERSTANDS the evolving and current world we live =
in
>and keeps up to date about the trade that this=20
>forum is for this post is NOT for you.
>
>This post is to _explain_ the previous that has=20
>an abbreviated current news snippet for those in the know.
>(and to also bitch-slap bernies for trying to be=20
>smug about a trade he has lost touch with)
>
>
>For those un-informed as the DEFINITION of what=20
>white spaces are, as described by the FCC.
>-This unused TV spectrum is commonly referred to=20
>as television =93white spaces=94 (TV white spaces).
>-The unlicensed devices that operate in this=20
>spectrum (TV band devices) generally provide communications
>-of broadband data and other services for consumers and businesses.
>
>For those un-informed about the FCC RULING of what 'white-spaces' are.
>-The Commission=92s rules provide for operation of=20
>low power unlicensed wireless devices in the
>-broadcast television spectrum (TV bands) at=20
>locations where that spectrum is unused by
>-licensed services=20
>(<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.pdf>ET=20
>Docket 04-186 &=20
><http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.pdf>ET=20
>Docket 10-174).
>
>The RULES for unlicensed devices that operate in=20
>the TV bands are set forth in=20
><http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=3Decfr&sid=3D94adaa165981=
6358a707dff2d9d150aa&rgn=3Ddiv6&view=3Dtext&node=3D47:1.0.1.1.14.8&idno=3D4=
7>47=20
>C.F.R. =A7=A7 15.701-.707
>
>Now for a more rudimentary explanation of the subject matter.
>
>For those un-informed as to what frequency channel 1 is.
><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_channel_frequencies>http://en.wik=
ipedia.org/wiki/Television_channel_frequencies
>
>Who the authority is in the white space radio spectrum.
><http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/white-space-database-administrators-guide=
>http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/white-space-database-administrators-guide=
=20
>
>
>For those that do not understand the CURRENT FCC rulings on 'White-spaces.
><http://www.fcc.gov/topic/white-space>http://www.fcc.gov/topic/white-space
>
>For those not up on current events as reported by CNN / Money's magazine.
><http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2012/technology/1203/gallery.coolest-tech-=
2012/index.html>
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2012/technology/1203/gallery=
.coolest-tech-2012/index.html
>
>
>
>----------
>Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:45:58 -0400
>To: tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com
>From: ber..._at_netaxs.com
>Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {6083}
>
>Really, what frequency range is TV Channel 1=20
>on? Whoever wrote this article got several=20
>facts wrong and clearly doesn't understand the=20
>subject matter or the relevant=20
>terminology. What's the source? People Magazine?
>
>
>At 04:13 AM 4/8/2012, you wrote:
>Hidden between individual television channels is=20
>a small but valuable collection of airwaves that=20
>will allow for a kind of =93super Wi-Fi=94 network.
>The Federal Communications Commission recently=20
>opened up the spectrum that sits between=20
>television channels numbered 1 through 51.
>
>Wireless communications in those =93white spaces=94=20
>have been permitted since Jan. 26 in Wilmington,=20
>N.C., the FCC=92s designated testbed location.=20
>After the bugs are worked out, the spaces will=20
>be opened up nationally in the coming months.
>
>The FCC designated the white spaces as=20
>=93unlicensed=94 band, meaning anyone can broadcast=20
>in it for free. It=91s a primo band that sits=20
>lower than today=92s Wi-Fi, allowing signals to=20
>travel over significantly longer distances and through buildings and walls=
.
>
>It=92ll take time for all the necessary=20
>infrastructure =97 including new chipsets for=20
>smartphones and other devices =97 to roll out, but=20
>FCC expects the expansion to lead to innovative=20
>new kinds of wireless networks, including=20
>connected highways, schools, parks and towns.
>
>Wireless carriers scrounging for more spectrum=20
>could also begin to broadcast Wi-Fi to=20
>customer-dense areas to reduce stress on their 3G and 4G networks.
--=====================_307157028==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<body>
As I previously pointed out, there is no TV Channel 1 (and there hasn't
been for about 66 years.) As for so-called white-space on unused TV
broadcast frequencies, some eavesdroppers have used those same
frequencies for bugs for several decades--and new FCC rulings won't
change that. <br><br>
Happy Easter, everyone..<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
At 11:51 AM 4/8/2012, Onionbreath wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=3Dcite class=3Dcite cite=3D"">
<font face=3D"Times New Roman, Times">For those who CLEARLY
UNDERSTANDS the evolving and current world we live in <br>
and keeps up to date about the trade that this forum is for this post is
NOT for you.<br><br>
This post is to _explain_ the previous that has an abbreviated current
news snippet for those in the know.<br>
(and to also bitch-slap bernies for trying to be smug about a trade he
has lost touch with)<br><br>
<br>
For those un-informed as the DEFINITION of what white spaces are, as
described by the FCC.<br>
-This unused TV spectrum is commonly referred to as television =93white
spaces=94 (TV white spaces).<br>
-The unlicensed devices that operate in this spectrum (TV band devices)
generally provide communications <br>
-of broadband data and other services for consumers and businesses.
<br><br>
For those un-informed about the FCC RULING of what 'white-spaces'
are.<br>
</font>-The Commission=92s rules provide for operation of low power
unlicensed wireless devices in the <br>
-broadcast television spectrum (TV bands) at locations where that
spectrum is unused by <br>
-licensed services
(<a href=3D"
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-260A1.=
pdf">
ET Docket 04-186</a> &
<a href=3D"
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-174A1.p=
df">
ET Docket 10-174</a>). <font face=3D"Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><br>
The RULES for unlicensed devices that operate in the TV bands are set
forth in
<a href=3D"
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=3Decfr&sid=
=3D94adaa1659816358a707dff2d9d150aa&rgn=3Ddiv6&view=3Dtext&node=
=3D47:1.0.1.1.14.8&idno=3D47">
47 C.F.R. =A7=A7 15.701-.707</a><br><br>
Now for a more rudimentary explanation of the subject matter. <br><br>
<font face=3D"Times New Roman, Times">For those un-informed as to what
frequency channel 1 is.<br>
</font>
<a href=3D"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_channel_frequencies">
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_channel_frequencies</a><br><br>
<font face=3D"Times New Roman, Times">Who the authority is in the white
space radio spectrum.<br>
</font>
<a href=3D"
http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/white-space-database-administrat=
ors-guide">
http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/white-space-database-administrators-guide</=
a>
<br><br>
For those that do not understand the CURRENT FCC rulings on
'White-spaces.<br>
<a href=3D"
http://www.fcc.gov/topic/white-space">
http://www.fcc.gov/topic/white-space</a><br>
<font face=3D"Times New Roman, Times"><br>
For those not up on current events as reported by CNN / Money's
magazine.<br>
</font>
<a href=3D"
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2012/technology/1203/gallery.cool=
est-tech-2012/index.html">
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2012/technology/1203/gallery.coolest-tech-20=
12/index.html</a>
<br><br>
<br>
<hr>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 10:45:58 -0400<br>
To: tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com<br>
From: ber..._at_netaxs.com<br>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {6083}<br><br>
Really, what frequency range is TV Channel 1 on? Whoever wrote this
article got several facts wrong and clearly doesn't understand the
subject matter or the relevant terminology. What's the
source? People Magazine?<br><br>
<br>
At 04:13 AM 4/8/2012, you wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd><font face=3D"Times New Roman, Times">Hidden between individual
television channels is a small but valuable collection of airwaves that
will allow for a kind of =93super Wi-Fi=94 network.<br>
<dd>The Federal Communications Commission recently opened up the spectrum
that sits between television channels numbered 1 through 51. <br><br>
<dd>Wireless communications in those =93white spaces=94 have been permitted
since Jan. 26 in Wilmington, N.C., the FCC=92s designated testbed location.
After the bugs are worked out, the spaces will be opened up nationally in
the coming months.<br><br>
<dd>The FCC designated the white spaces as =93unlicensed=94 band, meaning
anyone can broadcast in it for free. It=91s a primo band that sits lower
than today=92s Wi-Fi, allowing signals to travel over significantly longer
distances and through buildings and walls.<br><br>
<dd>It=92ll take time for all the necessary infrastructure =97 including ne=
w
chipsets for smartphones and other devices =97 to roll out, but FCC expects
the expansion to lead to innovative new kinds of wireless networks,
including connected highways, schools, parks and towns. <br><br>
<dd>Wireless carriers scrounging for more spectrum could also begin to
broadcast Wi-Fi to customer-dense areas to reduce stress on their 3G and
4G networks.</font><br>
</dl></blockquote></body>
</html>
--=====================_307157028==.ALT--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:23 CST