Video "First Look"

From: cptkaos <reco..._at_aol.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:26 2024
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: by 10.150.205.16 with SMTP id c16mr1417335ybg.20.1248556846813; Sat,
        25 Jul 2009 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <27167df7-1c2c-48ef-9752-2dfd43431235_at_i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 68.204.253.86
References: <27167df7-1c2c-48ef-9752-2dfd43431235_at_i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
        Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; MySpace;; yie8),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <e14b7d01-be62-4a2a-84ad-4cfbef72c48f_at_r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Video "First Look"
From: scorpion <scorpio..._at_hotmail.com>
To: TSCM-L Professionals List <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>

Jim had a great post, and that is what I would recommend. You may be
able to see the video before you get inside the building depending on
the size of the building, and how many walls it has to penetrate.

Also you can find unpowered cameras with a "spyfinder". They look for
the curvature of the lens. Therefore you can find them whether they
are operational, or not. You can clear a room in 30 seconds flat.
The drawback is it lets the "spy" know that you are on to them, or it
gives your TSCM away.



On Jul 20, 2:19 pm, cptkaos <rec..._at_aol.com> wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Anyone have recommendations for a relatively inexpensive “first look”
> solution for wireless covert video in the 1.1 – 6.8 GHz range. I’d
> like something that shows an image, but may not have the time to set
> up complex laptop, oscilloscope, etc. combinations. I’ve identified
> about 40 video transmitter frequencies from products made in China –
> no doubt there are a ton more.  I’m finding that these Chinese
> transmitter/receiver units with 12-16 channels are exponentially
> increasing in popularity for all the wrong reasons. Any suggestions
> (Rube Goldberg included) would be most welcome.
>
> Thanks in advance
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:26 CST