CALEA Logo

Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act
AskCALEA
Flag Ribbon

Law Enforcement Filings

star CALEA Proceeding
star Other Communications
star Joint Petition for Expedited Rulemaking

Law Enforcement CALEA Filings Under Other Communications Proceedings

Currently, there are several pending Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proceedings relating to packet-mode and other communications that have the potential to adversely impact the ability of law enforcement to lawfully intercept communications as provided by CALEA. The law enforcement community, led by the U.S. Department of Justice, has been actively involved in these proceedings through the submission of written comments and in-person meetings. Descriptions of these proceedings, along with copies of the filings, are found below.

FCC Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Forum
Undocketed

The purpose of the FCC's December 1, 2003, VoIP Forum was to gather information concerning advancements, innovations, and regulatory issues related to VoIP services. The DOJ, FBI, and DEA submitted joint comments to the Forum on December 15, 2003. These comments, along with other parties' submissions, are available to the public. For further information regarding the Forum, please visit the FCC VoIP Forum website.

FCC Broadband Proceedings
CC Docket No. 02-33
CC Docket No. 95-20
CC Docket No. 98-10
CS Docket No. 02-52

In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking FCC 02-42 released on February 15, 2002, the FCC initiated a proceeding to establish rules and regulations regarding the classification of "wireline broadband Internet access" under the Telecommunications Act. Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) service is an example of wireline broadband Internet access. In this document, the FCC "tentatively" decided that wireline broadband Internet access is an "information service."

In a Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking FCC 02-77 released on March 15, 2002, the FCC made a "declaratory ruling" that cable modem service (Internet access through cable TV lines) is an "information service" under the Telecommunication Act and initiated a proceeding to establish rules and regulations based on that finding.

Therefore, the FCC's pending wireline broadband Internet access proceeding is CC Docket Nos. 02-33, 95-20, and 98-10 and the cable modem broadband Internet access proceeding is CS Docket No. 02-52 (collectively the “FCC Broadband Proceedings”).

It should be noted that the FCC is not primarily focusing on CALEA in these proceedings, rather its emphasis is on the economic and policy concerns involved in regulation of these services under the Communications Act. However, since CALEA exempts "information service" from the surveillance capability requirements of Section 103, these FCC decisions have the potential to exclude broadband DSL and cable modem service from CALEA compliance.

The FBI filed the following comments in the Broadband Proceedings:

Pay-Per-Call Proceeding
CC Docket No. 96-146

On May 25, 2003, the FBI filed reply comments in the FCC pay-per-call proceeding in which the FCC is considering whether to modify the pay-per-call rules adopted pursuant to the Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act of 1992. In its comments, the FBI sought clarification that wireless broadband voice services are "telecommunications services" subject to CALEA.

Pulver.com's Free World Dialup Petition
WC Docket No. 03-45

On February 5, 2003, Pulver.com filed a Petition for Declaratory Ruling with the FCC requesting that its point-to-point broadband VoIP service be designated as an "information service" under the Communications Act. On February 14, 2003, the FCC released Public Notice DA 03-439 which established a pleading cycle for comments regarding Pulver.com's Petition. The DOJ and FBI filed joint comments in the proceeding on March 14, 2003.

Vonage Holdings Corporation Petition
WC Docket No. 03-211

On September 26, 2003, the FCC released Public Notice DA 03-2952 regarding Vonage Holdings Corporation's (Vonage) Petition requesting that the FCC preempt an order of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission requiring Vonage, and its VoIP service offering, to comply with state laws governing telecommunications carriers. The DOJ and FBI filed joint comments on October 27, 2003, opposing Vonage's petition. On November 24, 2003, the DOJ and FBI filed joint reply comments in this proceeding in response to other parties' comments.

BellSouth's Emergency Request for Declaratory Ruling
WC Docket No. 03-251

On January 15, 2004, the DOJ, FBI, and DEA (together "Law Enforcement") filed joint comments opposing an Emergency Request for Declaratory Ruling filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. ("BellSouth") before the FCC. In its petition, BellSouth requested that the FCC issue a ruling preempting state public utility commission decisions that require BellSouth to provide wireline broadband Internet access and DSL access services to BellSouth's local exchange carrier competitors. Law enforcement opposed BellSouth's petition based on concerns that this could have a negative impact on the ability of federal, state, and local law enforcement to conduct lawfully-authorized surveillance under CALEA.

Level 3 Communications LLC’s Petition for Forbearance
WC Docket No. 03-266

On March 1, 2004, the DOJ, FBI, and DEA (together "Law Enforcement") filed joint comments expressing no opinion regarding the merits of Level 3’s petition. However, law enforcement urged the FCC not to make any pronouncement that would put CALEA’s applicability to broadband telephony services into question, including any statement that Level 3’s “voice-embedded IP communications” are “information services” under the Communications Act.

Petition of SBC Communications Inc. for Forbearance of Title II Common Carrier Regulation to “IP Platform Services”
WC Docket No. 04-29

On May 28, 2004, the Department of Justice filed comments supporting the Commission’s use of forbearance authority to remove Communications Act obligations to the extent the Commission believes such obligations to be inappropriate, although DOJ expresses no opinion on particular forbearance decisions that the Commission might make. The Commission must recognize, however, that section 10 does not allow the Commission to forbear from enforcement of CALEA. CALEA’s obligations apply to all providers of IP networks and to many providers of IP services and applications, as outlined in DOJ’s pending petition for rulemaking.

In the Matter of IP-Enabled Services
WC Docket No. 04-36

On May 28, 2004, the Department of Justice filed comments which recognized that issues of CALEA applicability are distinct and reserved for the separate CALEA Rulemaking Petition, we urged that the Commission consider implications of actions in this proceeding to its ability to effect its stated goal that CALEA apply expansively -- i.e., to VoIP and other IP-enabled services. We appreciate the Commission’s recognition and support for law enforcement’s important mandate to maintain public safety.

The Department of Justice filed reply comments under WC Docket Nos. 04-29 and 04-36 on July 14, 2004. In its comments the law enforcement community stated that IP-enabled services hold tremendous promise for the American economy, and the DOJ fully supports the Commission’s undertaking of this important task of considering the proper role for the Commission with regard to such services. The DOJ also wants to encourage entrepreneurship, innovation, and widespread deployment of technologies that make Americans more productive. At the same time, it is important to keep in mind the critical task of protecting our citizens. With these goals in mind, the DOJ urges the Commission to act in the best interests of all Americans by imposing only those regulations necessary to accomplish important public policy goals such as the protection of public safety, national security and privacy concerns.

On June 3, 2005, the FCC released its First Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking FCC 05-116. In this Order, the Commission adopted rules requiring providers of interconnected voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service to supply enhanced 911 (E911) capabilities to their customers. The characteristics of interconnected VoIP services have posed challenges for 911/E911 and threaten to compromise public safety. Thus, the FCC required providers of interconnected VoIP service to provide E911 services to all of their customers as a standard feature of the service, rather than as an optional enhancement. The Commission further required them to provide E911 from wherever the customer is using the service, whether at home or away from home. The FCC made no findings regarding whether a VoIP service that is interconnected with the PSTN should be classified as a telecommunications service or an information service.

The FCC published a notice on July 27, 2005, at 70 Fed. Reg. 43323 (2004) that states that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the extensive information collection mandates contained in the FCC's VOIP E911 Order.

Fiber to the Premises Broadband Service
WC Docket 04-242

On July 22, 2004, the Department of Justice filed comments stating that Verizon's fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP) broadband service, like any other broadband-access service, must comply with CALEA. DOJ took no position on whether the FCC should require Verizon's FTTP broadband service to be subject to unbundling, tariffing, or cost-justification requirements or any economic regulation. DOJ stated that it understands Verizon's desire to resolve issues concerning its provision of FTTP broadband service as soon as possible and urges the Commission to make those decisions in a manner that eliminates doubt about the applicability of CALEA.

Wireless Broadband Task Force Report
GN Docket No. 04-163

The Department of Justice filed comments with the FCC on April 22, 2005, requesting that the Commission continue to preserve the vital national security and criminal law enforcement capabilities of CALEA as it develops a deregulatory framework for wireless broadband Internet access services.

Cellular Telephones and Other Wireless Devices Aboard Aircraft
WT Docket No. 04-435

On May 26, 2005, the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security filed comments with the FCC regarding the Commission's proposal to modify and relax its current ban on the airborne use of personal/passenger-owned wireless telephones and other devices - including those used for broadband applications. The Departments believe the Commission's proposal represents a significant change in the FCC's approach to the use of such devices aboard aircraft. The proposal raises not only regulatory and technical/operational issues, but also important public safety and national security issues.

Service Rules and Procedures to Govern the Use of Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Earth Stations in Frequency Bands Allocated to the Fixed Satellite Service
IB Docket No. 05-20

The Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security filed comments with the FCC on July 5, 2005, supporting the Commission’s efforts in this and related Commission proceedings to promote the efficient use of spectrum and to enable important new communications services to be provided to passengers, aircraft crew, and law enforcement officers on board aircraft. The Departments take this opportunity, however, to identify for the Commission various public safety and national security related concerns that stem from the Commission’s proposals. The Commission should carefully examine public safety and national security-related concerns in considering the appropriate regulatory and licensing framework for the use of two-way satellite-based broadband communications and data capabilities, devices, and services onboard aircraft.

 

^ Top ^ Notices Updated 8/25/2005