Frank Weltner Presents...
This Scholarly Library of Facts about Domestic &
Worldwide Zionist Criminality
The Jew Watch
Project Is The Internet's Largest Scholarly Collection of Articles on Zionist
History Free Educational Library for Private Study, Scholarship, Research &
News About Zionism
We Reveal Zionist Banksters, News Falsifiers, PR Liars, Neocons, Subversives,
Terrorists, Spies & More The Jew Watch Project's 1.5 Billion Pages Served Demonstrate Our Focus on Professionalism An Oasis of News for
Americans Who Presently Endure the Hateful Censorship of Zionist Occupation
US seeks to limit UN bias against Israel,
By JANINE ZACHARIA, Jerusalem Post,
September 19, 2004
"The US will try to limit the number of
one-sided, anti-Israel resolutions passed by the UN General Assembly during
its 59th session, which opens on Tuesday in New York, State Department
officials said. It will also try to win approval of a
resolution condemning anti-Semitism, which failed to pass last year.
Deputy assistant secretary of state Mark Lagon last week, in outlining
Washington's priorities for the session, included the hope that
the US would be able to block an inordinate number of
resolutions by the 191-member body that bash Israel. "The United
States seeks to bring balance to the number and content of Middle East
resolutions," Lagon said at a forum hosted by the Hudson Institute. Lagon
said the last General Assembly adopted 21 resolutions concerning the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, many of which implied "that only Israel has
obligations and responsibilities to make peace." The resolutions did not
mention suicide attacks against Israel, he noted. And he said, "they pressed
the case of the Palestinians, but failed to present a complete picture of
the situation on the ground, condemn all acts of terrorism, and recognize
the legitimate security concerns of the Israeli people." Lagon said too that
the US would also advocate for the abolition of a special UN General
Assembly committee directed to investigate Israeli practices and other
bodies "that are biased against Israel."
AIPAC's Power, or
America's Cowardice?,
by Charley Reese, antiwar.com, September 13,
2004
"It was 1996, and Bill Clinton was president. To give the rascal his due, he
was laboring mightily to make the Middle East peace process work. That same
year, three American neoconservatives produced a policy paper for the newly
elected Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The neocons were
Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser. Their
policy paper recommended to Netanyahu that he abandon the peace
process, reject "land for peace" and strengthen Israel's defenses in order
to confront Syria and Iraq. The document said, "This effort can focus on
removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq – an important Israeli strategic
objective in its own right." It also recommended that Israel use pretexts
for preemptive attacks. Now, if all of this sounds familiar – and it should
– that's because Perle, Feith and Wurmser joined other
neocons in the Bush administration. Perle was especially vocal in
pushing the war on Iraq. They had two pretexts: the attack of Sept. 11, even
though Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with it, and the mythical weapons of
mass destruction. Netanyahu, by the way, did abandon the peace
process. And, at a cost of $200 billion and nearly 1,000 American lives,
Israel did achieve its "strategic objective in its own right" – removing
Saddam from power. Unless Perle and his buddies were paid for their
advice, it didn't cost Israel one shekel or one life.
Furthermore, if you stretch your memory, you will recall that until Iraq
blew up in its face, the Bush administration was laying the groundwork to
attack Syria, the other country Perle and his crowd named as a target
for Israel. It has already imposed sanctions on Syria despite the fact that,
according to our own intelligence people, Syria had been cooperating with
the war on terror. The other target of the Israelis – excuse me, the Bush
administration – is Iran. If you want more details on these neocons, I
recommend Secrets and Lies, by Dilip Hiro, a distinguished Middle East
scholar, and James Bamford's A Pretext for War. When President Bush first
started talking about terrorism, he use to say "terrorists with global
reach" to distinguish between al-Qaeda and strictly local outfits with local
agendas. That did not suit the Israelis and their American supporters.
They wanted Israel's enemies to be our enemies,
and so the distinction was soon dropped, and Israel's enemies were added to
the official list of terrorist organizations. The problem is that
Hamas and Islamic Jihad are Palestinian organizations fighting for
independence. True, they have used terrorist tactics, just as the Jewish
organizations – the Stern Gang and the Irgun – did when they were fighting
the British occupation of Palestine. But their target
is the Israeli occupation, not us. Hezbollah is a Lebanese
organization that has also used terrorist tactics, including attacks against
Americans in Lebanon, when it figured we were helping the Israelis in their
occupation of Lebanon. But there again, its quarrel is with Israel.
I have long since given up the hope that Americans would wake up and resent
the manipulation of their government by a foreign country. The Israeli lobby
has been so successful in labeling any criticism of Israel, no matter how
justified, as anti-Semitic that most Americans prefer to stick their heads
in the sand. For sure, American politicians and much of the media
seem to be terrified by the Israeli lobby, which says more about their
cowardice than it does about the power of the lobby itself. So, suit
yourself. Go ahead and spend American blood and treasure for the benefit of
Israel. Just remember, the United States has one, and only one, legitimate
interest in the Middle East, and that is buying oil that everybody who has
it wants to sell. It doesn't matter whether we buy it from a dictator (we
bought plenty from Saddam) or from a democratic government. It doesn't
matter to us if the country that sells us oil likes or hates Israel.
This whole mess, including the war in Iraq and the
terrorist attacks, is a result of the American government's involvement with
Israel. It's a dangerous and unhealthy state of affairs that will not
be cured until Americans find the courage to have an open and honest debate
about our foreign policy in the Middle East."
The odd couple . . . tragically hip . . . monster review,
Arizona Republic, Sept. 4, 2004 12:00 AM
"Conservative radio talker Rush Limbaugh is dating CNN anchor and former
Phoenix TV reporter Daryn Kagan, a spokesman for Limbaugh confirmed
to the Washington Post.The newspaper's Reliable Source column reported
Friday that they were spotted at a party Limbaugh co-hosted at a New York
restaurant. Guests included such notable Republicans as Vice President Dick
Cheney, New York Gov. George Pataki and Sen. Bill Frist. According to the
Post: "The coupling came as a surprise to some friends who consider the
Atlanta-based Kagan part of the liberal media axis and a feminist -
but, then again, opposites attract." Limbaugh, 53, announced his separation
from his third wife, Marta, in early June. Kagan, 41, was a news reporter in
Phoenix for Channel 3 (KTVK-TV) for five years until 1994, when she moved to
CNN as a sportscaster. She now hosts CNN Live Today, which, the Post noted,
airs from 10 a.m. to noon, "ending just in time to catch her sweetie's
three-hour radio show."
Ries is a Jewish surname
Bush to Nominate Marcie B. Ries as Ambassador to Albania,
United States Government, September 24, 2004
"Ries previously served as chief of the U.S. mission in Pristina, Kosovo
Following is an excerpt from a September 23 White House personnel
announcement in which President Bush announced his intention to nominate
career Foreign Service Officer Marcie B. Ries
as U.S. ambassador to Albania: (begin text) The White House Office of the
Press Secretary September 23, 2004 Personnel Announcement The President
intends to nominate Marcie B. Ries, of the District of Columbia, to
be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States to the
Republic of Albania. A career member of the Senior Foreign Service, Ms. Ries
is currently serving as Senior Advisor to the Coordinator for Post-Conflict
Reconstruction and Stabilization at the State Department. She previously
served as Chief of Mission in Pristina, Kosovo. Prior to that, she was the
Director of the Office of United Nations Political Affairs, Bureau of
International Organization Affairs. Earlier in her career, Ms. Ries
served as Deputy Political Counselor in London and as Deputy Political
Counselor to the U.S. Mission to the European Union in Brussels. She earned
her bachelor's degree from Oberlin College and her master's degree from the
School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University."
U.S. to
Sell Precision-Guided Bombs to Israel,
BY DAVID WOOD, Newhouse News Service, September
23, 2004
"Amid growing concern that Israel might launch a
pre-emptive strike against Iran's budding nuclear program, the United
States is moving ahead with the transfer to Israel of 5,000 heavy,
precision-guided bombs, including 500 "earth-penetrating" 2,000-pound bombs
designed for use against underground facilities. The
$319 million arms transfer, proposed by the Bush administration June
1, went ahead after Congress took no action during its 30-day review period,
Jose Ibarra, a spokesman for the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, said
Wednesday. The deal is being financed from this year's
$2.16 billion military assistance grant to Israel. The transfer also
includes 2,500 2,000-pound Mark-84 bombs, 500 1,000-pound Mark-83 bombs,
1,500 500-pound Mark-82 bombs and live fuses. All the bombs are being fitted
with the Joint Direct Air Munitions (JDAM) kit which uses inertial guidance
and beacons from U.S. military Global Positioning Satellites for deadly
accuracy. "That's an arsenal for war," said Joseph Cirincione, senior
associate for non-proliferation at the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace in Washington. He said any attack on Iran's nuclear facilities,
clustered in three major complexes and dozens of other sites, "wouldn't be a
pinprick strike; it would have to be a large-scale military airstrike that
would result in large-scale casualties" ... War
games run at the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency to examine the
repercussions of a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities have
consistently reached a chilling conclusion: Iran would
unleash a wave of terrorism against Israeli targets worldwide and against
U.S. troops in the Middle East. Some 140,000 American military
personnel are currently stationed adjacent to Iran in Iraq and Kuwait.
Iranian missiles have the range to hit U.S. bases in the region. An Israeli
strike, and the wider war it might touch off, also
could send oil prices skyrocketing and jeopardize the global economy,
analysts say. Jay Greer, an official at the State Department's
political-military bureau, which oversees arms sales and transfers, said
giving the weapons to Israel "will in our view enhance U.S. national
security and foreign policy interests and help maintain Israel's qualitative
military edge in the region." Asked whether the transfer makes sense amid
the growing confrontation over Iran's nuclear program, Greer said, "I
can't talk about that."
Subject: Filmmaker Christine Rose will speak and show her film Liberty
Bound,
People for Progressive Radio & Voices
"Series: Filmmaker Christine Rose will speak and show her film Liberty Bound
Thursday, September 23 - Houston TX The Artery, 5401 Jackson @ Prospect
Time: 8pm Liberty Bound a film, is a US Citizen's journey of discovery into
the lies, oppression, and corruption that has invaded her country since
9/11. Liberty Bound explores the state of the union
and its ostensible move toward fascism. This film is about historic
events-it is a film about courage and fear; propaganda and rhetoric This is
an exciting time in history, and we can all play a significant role in this.
With the success of "Fahrenheit 9/11" and subsequent documentaries like "The
World According to Bush," "Outfoxed," and Liberty Bound, we have a real
chance to educate the American people and influence the November elections.
We can show the people the information they don't get through the corporate
media. Thank you again for your interest and support. Without you, this
could not be possible. Christine Rose Blue Moose Films www.libertybound.com"
Paid Politicians Targeting Christian Boycott of Israel,
by Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press,
October 16, 2004
"At the instigation of the Zionist
Organization of America, 13 members of Congress have sent a letter to the
Department of Commerce demanding that action be taken to
stop the American branches of the Presbyterian and Episcopalian churches
from divesting in companies that do business in Israel. They have
suggested that the churches are in violation of the U.S. Export
Administration Act (EAA), which prohibits Americans from participating in
the long-standing Arab boycott of Israel. But the campaign by the “paid
politicians” against the Christian churches goes much further than this: the
members of Congress are going so far as to suggest that, along with the
churches, students, academic organizations and other institutions that urge
Americans to disinvest in companies doing business with Israel are also in
violation of the EAA. The members of Congress are charging that the very act
of advocating divestment from Israel is illegal.
The ringleaders of the group are two New Jersey representatives: Jim
Saxton, a Republican, and Rob Andrews, a Democrat. The 11 others include:
Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.), Pete Sessions (R-Texas), Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.),
Michael McNulty (D-N.Y.), Peter King (R-N.Y.), Madeleine Bordallo (D-Guam),
Martin Frost (D-Texas), Philip Crane (R-Ill.), Shelley Berkley
(D-Nev.), Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Marilyn Musgrave (R-Colo.). A press
release from the Zionist Organization of America, dated Sept. 28, 2004,
claimed credit for inducing the bipartisan group of federal office holders
to send the letter to the Commerce Department. I n the meantime,
another group of congressmen, led by Rep. Howard L. Berman
(D-Calif.), have sent a strongly worded letter to the Presbyterian Church
USA condemning the vote to begin selective disinvestments from companies
doing business with Israel.
Those representatives joining Berman in attacking the Presbyterian
Church for its action include: Roy Blunt (R-Missouri), Steny Hoyer (D-Md.),
Deborah Pryce (R-Ohio), John Lewis (D-Ga.), John Linder (R-Ga.),
Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), Mark Steven Kirk (R-Ill.), Gary Ackerman
(D-N.Y.), Eric Cantor (R-Va.), Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.),
Tom Feeney (R-Fla.), Barney Frank (D-Mass.), and Lamar
Smith (R-Texas). Joining the members of Congress in slamming the
Presbyterian and Episcopal churches is Rabbi Gary Bretton-Granatoor,
the “interfaith affairs director” of the Israeli lobby group known as the
Anti-Defamation League."
Poll:
N.Y.'s Russian Jews Backing Bush,
Newsmax, September 30, 2004
"New York's Jewish community favors John Kerry by a whopping 64 percent to a
mere 24 percent for George Bush, according to the American Jewish Committee
(AJC), which recently conducted a poll. But among Russian Jews in the Big
Apple - about 20 percent of the city's Jewish population - Bush comes out
with 54 percent to Kerry's mere 14 percent, in another AJC survey not yet
made public."From my conversations with a wide assortment of people in the
Russian community, I would estimate that the numbers are something like 8 to
1 for Bush over Kerry," Ari Kagan, executive director of
the United Association of East European Jewry and a commentator for the
Russian Forward, told New York's The Jewish Week.
"The feeling for Bush is so vociferous that I don't know of one prominent
person in the Russian community who is willing to say openly he is backing
Kerry," Kagan added. "Even though Russian Jews are mainly registered
Democrats, lately many are reluctant to say out loud they are Democrats
because they don't want to be tied to Kerry." Fira Stukelman,
former president of the Association of Holocaust Survivors from the Former
Soviet Union and one of the community's leading advocates for seniors, told
The Jewish Week that while older Russians voted strongly for Al Gore over
Bush in 2000, "This time they are going overwhelmingly for Bush over Kerry.
The reason is simple: Israel, Israel and Israel.
"Russian Jews are convinced Bush is the best friend Israel has ever had and
is doing more to protect Israel's interests than any other American
president." This despite media reports that the Bush administration is
proposing sharp cuts in funding for Section 8 housing and concurrent steep
rises in rents for those federally subsidized residents. "Many of our people
live in Section 8 apartments and simply cannot afford rent hikes," she said.
"Yet they say, 'First and foremost, let Israel live and we'll worry about
everything else, including housing costs, after that' ... Hank
Sheinkopf, a political consultant who works primarily for
Democrats, told The Jewish Week he is concerned about what the growth of the
New York Russian community means for his party not only this year but in the
future. "The future of the Jewish community in New
York City clearly rests with the Russians," Sheinkopf
told The Jewish Week. "There is a question as to whether they share the
communal agenda, but the Jewish community needs them if we are to have any
political force in the future.' 'It seems to me that the overall Jewish
community is moving toward the center-right,' he added. 'These days the
Jewish agenda is less ideological and more bread and butter.
Jews are a lot more concerned about Israel and
anti-Semitism than they are about abortion and gay rights.'"
Remarks by the President at Victory 2004 Rally, The White House (U.S. Government)
"[George W. Bush]: I believe that millions in the Middle East plead in
silence for their freedom. I believe that women in the Middle East want to
live in a free society. I believe moms in the Middle East want to raise
their child in a free world. I believe all these things, because freedom is
not America's gift to the world. Freedom is the Almighty God's gift to each
man and woman in this world. (Applause.)
Extending freedom means confronting the evil of anti-Semitism.
Today, I signed the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of
2004. This law commits the government to keep a record of
anti-Semitic acts throughout the world, and also a record of responses to
those acts. This nation will keep watch
and make sure the ancient impulse of anti-Semitism never finds a
home in the modern world. (Applause.)"
The Strip Club Vote,
By Rose Aguilar, AlterNet, October 18, 2004
"Since May, 800 of the roughly 4,000 adult clubs in America have launched
voter registration efforts, registering an average of 200 voters per club.
"This is the most important time to be active. There will never be a more
important election," says Spike Goldberg,
CEO of Homegrownvideo.com, an amateur porn streaming
video site that receives 100,000 unique daily visitors. "Until now,
no one has harnessed that power. This is merely the beginning."
Homegrownvideo.com’s "Get Out the Vote" banner ads link to the Rock the Vote
web site. Rock the Vote doesn’t tally new voters specifically from porn
sites, but overall, the non-partisan organization has registered 1.3 million
new voters ... David Wasserman, a first amendment attorney
who defends adult web site operators, says those
[by Attorney General Ashcroft] actions are the tip of the iceberg. "My fear
is that a second Bush administration will unleash a slew of prosecutions
against adult entertainment web sites, video stores and producers of adult
films."
Supporters of Senate Candidate Abe Hirschfeld to Protest His Exclusion From
Upcoming Senatorial Debates, PR Newswire,
October 7, 2004
"Supporters of U.S. Senate candidate Abe Hirschfeld are
planning a protest in response to two upcoming New York Senate race debates,
to which Hirschfeld was not invited ... As
Hirschfeld notes, "All candidates should have a chance to take part
in these debates. If my opponents wanted to hold a debate, why didn't anyone
extend an invitation to me?" As oneof New York City's top developers for
over 50 years, Hirschfeld has also had a long career in
public service, beginning with three terms as treasurer of the New York
State Democratic Committee. He also served two terms on the Tri-State
Regional Planning Commission, and in 1997 was named Man of the Year by the
Republican Party, and received the Presidential Roundtable Membership.Hirschfeld
has made runs for New York State Lieutenant Governor, Manhattan Borough
President and other public offices. He ran for U.S. Senate in 2000; during
his 2004 Senate campaign, he has spent $1 million of his own money on TV ads
and another $1 million on print ads."
Congress Passes Lantos's Antisemitism Bill,
U.S. Newswire, October 11, 2004
"Both houses of Congress have unanimously
passed legislation requiring the U.S. to
monitor anti-Semitism around the world, despite the
State Department's opposition. The bill, known as the Global
Anti-Semitism Awareness Act (H.R. 4230), was introduced by Congressman
Tom Lantos (D-Calif.), in response to the rising tide of
anti-Semitism in Europe and the Middle East. Lantos is the
only Holocaust survivor serving in the Congress. The bill requires the State
Department to compile an annual report on anti-Semitism around the world,
and establishes an office within the department
to focus on the issue. The State Department at first stalled the bill, by
arguing that Lantos's proposal would "extend exclusive
status to one religious or ethnic group." But the legislation moved
forward in recent weeks after the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust
Studies and former Congressman Stephen Solarz organized
more than 100 prominent Americans to sign a letter to Secretary of State
Colin Powell, protesting the State Department's position. As the San
Francisco Chronicle reported: "One key to advancing Lantos'
bill may have been the surprise intervention of the David S. Wyman Institute
for Holocaust Studies. The Pennsylvania-based organization, named for a
historian who has written about the West's response to the Holocaust,
organized an open letter to Powell signed by 104 prominent Americans. They
included former Republican vice presidential nominee Jack Kemp, former
United Nations ambassador Jeanne Kirkpatrick, ex-CIA director James Woolsey
and Pulitzer Prize-winning author Garry Wills. 'I was delighted and totally
surprised by this bipartisan, multi-faith group,' said Lantos. The letter
was signed by prominent Americans from across the spectrum of the religious,
political, academic and entertainment worlds. In addition to Kemp and
Kirkpatrick, the signatories included former National Security Advisor
Anthony Lake, singers Janis Ian and Peter Himmelman,
comedian David Brenner, former State Department Legal
Advisor Abraham Sofaer, writers Cynthia Ozick
and Thane Rosenbaum, and leaders of four top Christian
religious seminaries: the Union Theological Seminary, Yale Divinity School,
Drew Theological Seminary and Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary ... (For
the full text of the letter, with all the signatories, go to
http://www.WymanInstitute.org)."
NCSJ: Congress Adds Stronger State Department Focus on Anti- Semitism,
U.S. Newswire, October 11, 2004
"NCSJ welcomed final Congressional passage of a bill that
requires the U.S. State Department to report on global anti-Semitism and
designates a U.S. special envoy to promote monitoring and combating of anti-
Semitism worldwide ... In addition to the reporting
requirements, the version passed last week by
the House of Representatives includes additional measures such as
establishment of a State Department office and envoy for monitoring and
combating anti- Semitism ... "In the past few months," NCSJ President Joel
M. Schindler noted, "NCSJ has been fortunate to testify on this issue before
both the Senate and House committees and the Helsinki Commission, using each
hearing to strongly support this initiative. We have also reached out to our
partners in the State Department to discuss how these
new tools could be employed. At every
level, the State Department is a catalyst for European
governments to combat anti-Semitism, and Congress has now provided new
avenues for this mission." Testifying in the House of Representatives last
week, prior to the House and Senate votes, NCSJ Executive Director
Mark B. Levin said the robust reporting will "measure consistently
which countries are contributing to the problem and which are contributing
to the solution, domestically as well as in such international fora as the
United Nations and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE). Additionally, while the OSCE waits for many of its member states to
meet their obligations to supply data on anti-Semitism and efforts to
combat it in their own countries, a U.S. global
review provides an initial read-out of such data worldwide." Levin
is currently in Warsaw as a Public Member of the U.S. delegation to
the annual OSCE review conference on human rights. In that capacity, he will
address the 55 member governments, supporting an OSCE special representative
on anti-Semitism, a clear agenda for next year's OSCE anti-Semitism
follow-up conference in Spain, and full funding and cooperation in the
OSCE's collection of data on anti-Semitic and
other hate crimes ... According to Dr. Meth, "Designating
an office and envoy will enhance the existing mandate of the
State Department's Office of Holocaust Issues,
which has been the quarterback in Washington for U.S. policy on global
anti-Semitism, working closely with the U.S. Mission to the OSCE in Vienna."
NCSJ: Advocates on behalf of Jews in Russia, Ukraine, the Baltic States &
Eurasia - a voluntary, non-profit agency created in 1971 - is the mandated
central coordinating agency of the organized American Jewish community for
policy and activities on behalf of the estimated 1.5 million Jews in the
former Soviet Union. NCSJ comprises nearly 50 national organizations and
over 300 local federations, community councils and committees across the
United States."
Experts at monitoring and regimenting citizens and
herding Arabs, an Israeli-based company gets the new contract for American
"know everything about you" passports.
SuperCom Wins Tender For The Integration Of The United States Smart Passport,
Yahoo, October 11, 2004
"NEW YORK, and RA'ANANA, Israel ---- SuperCom,
Ltd. a leading smart card and eID technology integrator and solutions
provider serving governmental and commercial markets, announced today that
the United States Government Printing Office (GPO) has informed that the
Company's proposal as a prime contractor for the integration of smart card
technology in the US new electronic passports has been accepted for award.
In addition, SuperCom's proposal as a
sub-contractor with a leading American system integrator corporation has
also been accepted for award in this project. This project is considered to
be the largest and most advanced smart passport project in the world to
date. The US authorities have announced multiple awards for the
implementation of the project that will include the production of smart
inlay for the new passports with a sophisticated chip
containing personal identification such as biometric data. This type
of passport will be difficult to forge and will replace the traditional
passport that contained a printed personal photograph and was considered to
be easy to falsify. The scope of the project based on the RFP is estimated
at 50 million passports over the following five years. In this project,
SuperCom will supply the smart card technology that it has developed over
the recent years including the smart chip with an operating system and
antenna that is embedded in the passport ... SuperCom, Ltd. is engaged in
research, development and marketing of advanced technologies and products
for smart-card solutions and government e-ID projects. SuperCom offers a
wide range of standard and customized smart card-based solutions for
physical and logical security, education, corrections facilities and air &
seaports. SuperCom is also a leader in the manufacturing of secure and
durable documents such as national identity cards, passports, visas,
drivers' licenses and vehicle registration. Together with its subsidiaries,
SuperCom offers advanced, innovative and flexible solutions in contact and
contactless smart-card technologies. Headquartered in
Israel, SuperCom has subsidiaries in the US and Hong Kong."
Nice Systems provides security at Statue of Liberty,
by Avi Krawitz, THE JERUSALEM POST,
Sep. 28, 2004 "Nice Systems is helping to secure the newly reopened Statue
of Liberty complex using its smart video solutions, the
Ra'anana [Israel] based company said Tuesday. The company has been
working with the United States Park Police in charge of protecting the
statue, and installed its solutions in the complex in time for its opening
on August 3, 2004. The company would not disclose the value of the contract.
The Nice solution uses IT-grade video networking and
management and delivers images and advanced analytic applications to the
park police to help protect the 117-year-old national monument. The
Statue was closed to tourists after the events of September 11, 2001 and was
reopened amidst warnings of further terror attacks on strategic buildings
and monuments in New York and Washington DC. It was opened with tightened
security measures in place including a new bomb-detection device that blows
a blast of air into clothing and then checks for particles of explosive
residue. Nice provides solutions and consulting
services to more than 15,000 customers in over 100 countries,
enabling them to extract value from multimedia interactions."
Motorola Wins U.S.
Posting Scanning Deal,
by Hader Horash, Haaretz
(Israel), October 6, 2004
"Motorola Israel will provide the U.S. Postal Service with $300 million in
scanning and tracking systems in the next three years. USPS reported the
deal and stated it is expected to get final approval at a November board of
directors meeting. The devices developed by Motorola allow electronic
scanning of mail items and ongoing reports of their location in the delivery
route. "Information on mail is becoming as valuable as the mail itself,"
said USPS senior vice president Charlie Bravo. The United States Postal
Service is the largest company of its kind in the world with $68.5 billion
in annual turnover. The development and manufacture of
the systems is concentrated in Israel in Motorola's mobile data
communications division. Motorola is considered unlikely to expand its Arad
factory as a result of the contract but will probably outsource some systems
and services to a subcontractor with a 100-person payroll. The deal ensures
Motorola work in manufacturing systems for mail services.
Motorola Israel has so far provided mail tracking
systems to five major companies and now dominates more than half the market.
USPS is already Motorola's largest client in the sector, having received
more than $1 billion in devices. Other major contracts involved German
postal service Deutsche Post, overnight delivery giant Federal Express, DHL
and Airborne. The Motorola systems in the contract can read complex
bar codes on packages and provide detailed information. A camera instead of
the currently popular laser cameras reads the bar code. Messengers will be
able to accept the recipient's signature on the device screen, transmitting
the signed form to the company's computer center via electronic
transmission."
Hanukkah Postage Stamp Issued Today by U.S. Postal Service, Yahoo! Financial News, October 15, 2004
"A new 37-cent Hanukkah stamp was issued today by the U.S. Postal
Service at the Postage Stamp Mega Show in New York City. Art director
Ethel Kessler combined two elements in the design of the
stamp: the type in the background spelling out Hanukkah, designed by
Greg Berger, and a photograph of a dreidel (a four-sided top), made
by Elise Moore. The dreidel is from the collection of
Rabbi Lennard and Dr. Linda Thal, who purchased it
in Jerusalem."
U.S. Pressured to
settle claims army plundered Jewish riches,
Haaretz, (Israel), October 12, 2004
"Bipartisan political pressure is building for
the Bush administration to settle a lawsuit by Hungarian Jews who claim the
United States plundered family riches that had been seized by the Nazis
during World War II. federal judge in Miami is considering a renewed Justice
Department attempt to scuttle the class-action lawsuit. A hearing is set for
tomorrow before U.S. District Judge Patricia Seitz in Miami on legal issues
that need to be decided to determine whether the lawsuit goes to trial. She
ruled against the Justice Department once before and last year accused
higher-ups in the government of "dragging their feet." The train and cargo,
worth an estimated $50-120 million, were shrouded in official secrecy until
the Presidential Advisory Commission on Holocaust Assets detailed it in a
1999 draft report ... The lawsuit seeks up to $10,000
each for as many as 30,000 Hungarian Jews and their survivors. John
Kerry earlier this month called for a quick and fair settlement. On the
opposite side of the political spectrum, Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen,
a Miami Republican, wrote White House strategist Karl Rove on Sept. 30,
urging that the Holocaust survivors receive restitution."
Bush, Kerry make appeals to Orthodox Jewish voters, [AUDIO]
NPR (National Public Radio), Morning Edition,
October 12, 2004
"Despite Kerry's strong poll numbers with the Jewish population, analysts
see Orthodox Jewish voters going to President Bush because of his support
for Israel. NPR's Ari Shapiro reports."
The State Department's extreme makeover. A veteran Foreign Service officer
warns that when Colin Powell departs in a second Bush term, America will
lose its last bulwark against the radical ideologues who are planning more
Iraqs, by Anonymous, Salon.com,
October 4, 2004
"Editor's note:"Anonymous" is a veteran Foreign Service
officer currently serving as a State Department official. The views
expressed are personal and not related to his official position.
Secretary of State Colin Powell is not staying for a second Bush term. When
he goes, the last bulwark against complete
neoconservative control of U.S. foreign policy goes with him. The
implications are enormous, yet the American electorate appears to be blinded
by the Bush campaign's deliberate manipulations of 9/11.
Powell has served both as the reasoned voice of career diplomats and the
experienced voice of career U.S. military in the Bush administration.
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ignored military advice and excluded
Department of State career professionals from Iraq planning. Power was
concentrated in the hands of a clique of neocon ideologues he placed in key
policy positions, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul
Wolfowitz and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Douglas
Feith. In the first term of George W. Bush, protégés of now
disgraced former Defense Policy Board member and neocon godfather
Richard Perle achieved control or subordination of every executive
branch foreign-policymaking body -- except the Department of State ... The
realization that the same neocons who dismissed State's accurate "Future of
Iraq Project," prepared before the war, may now take over at State in the
second term is widely viewed inside the department as a threat to the very
integrity of the country's diplomatic first line of defense. Corridor
discussion has turned desperate ... Retired U.S. ambassadors and diplomats
have raised their own public concerns in signed public statements about the
direction of U.S. foreign policy -- but that concern pales compared with the
quiet revolt brewing against a neocon takeover at Foggy Bottom.
After 9/11, Wolfowitz, Feith and his
subordinate, Harold Rhode, recruited David Wurmser as a
contractor from the conservative think tank the American Enterprise
Institute to set up what became known internally as the "Wurmser-Maloof"
project. F. Michael Maloof, neocon fellow traveler and former aide to
Richard Perle, and Wurmser created a
hidden intelligence unit, the Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group, under
Feith at the Pentagon. The purpose of the group was to
end-run the CIA and create the rationale for invading Iraq. The parallel
operations model was previously followed by Oliver North at the National
Security Council and Elliott Abrams at State in their
ill-fated Iran-Contra strategy. It should have come as no surprise that
another neocon think-tank insider, Abram Shulsky, an
Abrams colleague from their days as staffers to Sen. Henry
"Scoop" Jackson, would end up heading up what became the Office of Special
Plans, the secret intelligence unit at the Pentagon under Feith.
The weapons of mass destruction disinformation that was fed to the president
and to the American public came directly from Shulsky's
shop. After setting up this operation at the Pentagon for Wolfowitz
and Feith, Wurmser, with the help of Perle, was sent in
early 2002 to burrow in at State as senior advisor to John Bolton, under
secretary for arms control and international security. In December 2002,
Wolfowitz, Feith, Wurmser
and Vice President Cheney's national security advisor, I. Lewis
"Scooter" Libby, acting together, maneuvered Condoleezza Rice into
appointing Elliott Abrams to the position of special assistant to the
president and senior director for the Middle East at the National Security
Council. This appointment gave the neocons everything
they wanted -- the NSC, Executive Office of the President, Office of the
Vice President, the Pentagon, a cornered director in George Tenet at CIA,
and Wurmser at State. The neocons had control of the information reaching
the president and a channel for their pseudo-intelligence product from
Wolfowitz and Feith's secret Pentagon
Office of Special Plans. The only wild card was Colin Powell and
State's elite and independent Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR)... A
Perle neocon protégé, Michael Rubin, has been given the
task of destroying the only competition -- L. Paul "Jerry" Bremer, the
former Iraq Coalition Provisional Authority chief, not a neocon insider and
the favorite of traditional Republican conservatives. The neocon plan is to
make Bremer the scapegoat: It was not bad neocon policy, it was bad Bremer
decisions that has led to the fiasco in Iraq. Rubin was sent to Baghdad to
be Wolfowitz's man inside the CPA. Bremer dissed Rubin as a lightweight.
Rubin tried to push neocon policy inside the CPA -- what he, Perle and Ahmed
Chalabi had pushed from the American Enterprise Institute -- restoring the
Hashemite monarchy in Iraq by placing Jordan's Crown Prince Hassan on the
throne. Bremer would have none of it. Rubin is now tasked
by Perle and Wolfowitz to trash Bremer --
which he is dutifully doing in print and media appearances arranged by
neocon handler, lecture agent and media booker Eleana Benador
... Wurmser, Perle and Feith
were the principal authors of the 1996 100-day policy plan for incoming
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. None ever registered
under the Foreign Agents Registration Act for this work.
That plan, "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," published
by Israel's Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, has
served as the guiding road map for the neocons both in Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon's office and in the Bush
administration. No one should have been surprised by Iraq --
the neocons have not been coy in laying out their
vision of Israel's security requirements. David Wurmser
published a book-length version of his IASPS study at AEI. The
introduction to that screed, "Tyranny's Ally: America's Failure to Defeat
Saddam Hussein," was written by Richard Perle. It lists as
sources Ahmed Chalabi, Michael Ledeen, Douglas
Feith and Harold Rhode. Control at State would remove the last
obstacle to the plan Perle, Wurmser and
Feith laid long before 9/11 ...
The neocons, working in tandem with a similar staff in the office of Prime
Minister Sharon of Israel, have a three-part agenda for the
first part of Bush's second term: first, oust Yasser Arafat; second,
overthrow the secular Baathist al-Assad dictatorship in Syria; and, third,
eliminate, one way or another, Iran's nuclear facilities.
Nowhere has support for the neocon Middle East crusade resonated more than
in the constituency of Rep. Tom DeLay, who is the top
Christian Zionist handler in the Republican Party and poised to
strike GOP gold with his gerrymandering of Texas congressional districts."
Neocon pink slips and the fall of America,
By Kurt Nimmo, Online Journal, October 2, 2004
"Here's the unspeakable truth: I lost my job to make
Israel safe. Or more specifically: an obscene amount of tax dollars
are flushed down the Pentagon rat hole every year while billions are slashed
from state and social programs, including education. I worked for a
state-funded education program. I was pink-slipped because there's no money
for the program this year. In short, George Bush fired me.
The Bushcon invasion of Iraq costs $177 million per day, $7.4 million per
hour, and $122,820 per minute. So far, the invasion
has cost an astounding $134.5 billion. "When you integrate Iraqi
spending, which is necessary, with the effort to control spending, it puts
more pressure on you to make harder choices," said Senator Lindsey Graham
(R-SC) in June. "If you can name one part of government immune from this,
I'd like to know." Hard choices—like throwing Americans out of work.
But according to Republicans such as Patrick Toomey (R-Pa), even more
Americans need face the "hard choice" of poverty. Education and social
services are non-starters when compared to blowing things up and butchering
thousands of mostly innocent people. "I'd say let's have a smaller deficit,"
said Toomey in June. "But most of all, don't spend it on something else. The
non-defense, non-security part of the budget is out of control." For
instance, literacy programs for poor kids. In other words, billions will be
squandered on "security" to protect Israel from its
enemies before a dime is spent here in America on education,
nutrition programs, repairing our crumbling infrastructure, and other things
insignificant to Republicans and their multinational corporate masters. As
we now know, or should know if we pay attention, Iraq was invaded at the
behest of Israel and a small clan of extreme right-wing Likudites."
US to rate its allies on their treatment of Jews, By David Rennie,
Telegraph (UK), October 13, 2004
"In another test of America's frayed relations with France, Russia and other
allies, the US Congress has ordered the State
Department to start rating governments throughout the world on their
treatment of Jewish citizens. The resulting
report cards on anti-Semitism would be published in annual US surveys of
human rights abuses around the world.The
proposed law was passed by the House of Representatives on Monday, in
response to what its sponsors called an alarming surge in anti-Semitism,
especially in Europe. It has already been passed by the Senate. Congress
overruled strong opposition from diplomats at the State Department who
complained in an internal memo that a special focus on Judaism, "opens
us to charges of favouritism and challenges the credibility of our reporting".
There is little doubt that the new law will create diplomatic waves. France,
Russia, Malaysia, Egypt, Canada and Australia were singled out by
congressional sponsors of the law as countries that had witnessed disturbing
outbreaks of discrimination against Jews in the past year.
The law, the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act, also
ordered the establishment of an office at the State Department dedicated to
monitoring anti-Semitism, again over the department's protests. The
resulting internal row must now be resolved by President George W Bush as
the legislation heads to his desk from Congress. With the act overwhelmingly
backed by both parties, officials in Congress said they expected he would
sign it into law. A three-page State Department
memorandum, leaked to The Telegraph yesterday, complained that congressional
plans would throw US human rights reporting "out of balance", and "erode our
credibility by being interpreted as favouritism in human rights reporting".
In a sign of the diplomatic anxieties, the State Department argued
for anti-Semitism monitoring to remain a task conducted behind closed doors,
by the department's existing "special envoy for holocaust issues" ...
Tom Lantos, a California Democrat and Holocaust survivor
who was one of the sponsors, denounced State Department talk of
"favouritism" as an alarming nod to "the worst stereotypes of Jews
perpetrated in anti-Semitic tracts throughout modern history".
Yoran abruptly resigns as U.S. cybesecurity czar,
Search Security, October 1, 2004,
"The nation's cybersecurity chief quit Friday, a week after House
Republicans backed off from moving cybersecurity functions from the
Department of Homeland Security to the White House budget office.
Amit Yoran resigned Thursday, giving one day's notice, according to
the Associated Press. Yoran said Friday he left to pursue
other opportunities. But, the AP reported, he'd confided to colleagues in
the tech industry he was frustrated by the lack of attention the DHS had
given cybersecurity issues ... Yoran held the top national
cybersecurity job for a year and previously served as a Symantec Corp.
software executive after selling his company, Riptech, to Symantec for $145
million in July 2002. Within the DHS, Yoran's division
included 60 employees and an $80 million budget to carry out recommendations
within the president's National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace. Lobbyists for
the tech industry had tried unsuccessfully to elevate Yoran's
position and standing within the DHS in the hopes of garnering more
resources and visibility. "
NCSJ is one of the billions of Jewish/Zionist censorial Lobbies,
this one linked to Eastern European Jewry.
NCSJ's Mark Levin Named to U.S. Delegation at OSCE Annual Meeting, U.S. Newswire, September 28, 2004
"Mark B. Levin, executive director of NCSJ, has been named
a public member of the official U.S. Delegation to the annual review
conference of European human rights. The Human Dimension Implementation
Meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)
will take place October 4-15 in Warsaw. Levin will
represent the United States in discussions with other delegations from the
55-member organization, and will address the delegations in the session
on combating anti-Semitism and intolerance.
Levin's biographical profile is available online at
http://ncsj.org/AuxPages/Levinbio.shtml " I am very honored to have been
selected for this year's meeting," Levin said. "My first
participation in the Helsinki Process was over 20 years ago, and OSCE
remains as relevant today in the new Europe still haunted by old demons
like anti-Semitism." Levin most
recently served as a Public Member to the first-ever OSCE Conference on
Anti-Semitism in Vienna, in 2003, and as a Public Advisor to last April's
follow-up conference in Berlin. "The Human Dimension meetings are the annual
opportunity to review how the OSCE as an institution and how the individual
countries are all fulfilling their commitments on a variety of human rights
and democracy issues," Levin noted. "This is only the
second year that anti-Semitism will be addressed
there as a unique phenomenon with
specific strategies to combat it. My emphasis in Warsaw will be on
pushing European governments to provide the data on hate crimes and report
on their efforts to promote tolerance, as well as getting the OSCE's own
machinery to solicit and collect the information." As a member of the U. S.
delegation, Levinwill also be
advocating for the appointment of a special OSCE representative on
anti-Semitism who can harmonize the OSCE efforts, and for promoting a
follow-up anti-Semitism conference next year in Spain ... Major
organizations such as the American Jewish Committee,
Anti-Defamation League and B'nai B'rith International will be
participating in their capacity as non- governmental organizations
Fury over French MEP Holocaust Denial, Expatica (AFP), October 14, 2004
"European Parliament president Josep Borrell Thursday furiously attacked a
French far-right member of the European Parliament who questioned the
existence of Nazi gas chambers used in the Holocaust. National Front member
Bruno Gollnisch had this week said that "historians might question the
number of deaths" in the Nazi genocide of the Jews and on the gas chambers'
existence, said: "It is up to historians to decide." Borrell condemned "in
the firmest possible manner" the remarks by Gollnisch, who was speaking on
Monday in his home city of Lyon in response to a report on Holocaust denial
by French historian Henry Rousso. The head of the European Union assembly,
calling for Gollnisch to be prosecuted, told a
news conference that the
remarks "revolt us, insult us, shock us". "Mr Gollnisch, be aware that I'm
shamed to have heard a European deputy put in doubt by such scandalous
affirmations the existence of the gas chambers ... One cannot deny history,
one cannot contest the Holocaust," Borrell said. "I hope that you will be
answerable to justice for these calumnies." The controversy sparked by
Gollnisch recalls a huge row that erupted in 1987 when National Front leader
Jean-Marie Le Pen described the gas chambers as a "detail of history".
Israel
Fears Strong EU, Deutsche Welle, October 14, 2004
"A confidential report from the Israeli Foreign
Ministry has predicted relations with the European Union could further
deteriorate in future, hitting Israel economically and diplomatically.
The report points to the "possibility of a deterioration
in relations," one of the report's authors told the EUobserver Web
site on Wednesday. According to Israeli press reports, the document, a
ten-year forecast prepared by Israel's foreign ministry, states that Israel
and the EU find themselves on a collision course which would cause serious
economic and diplomatic damage to the country. "Such a collision course
holds the risk of Israel losing international legitimacy and could lead to
its isolation in the manner of South Africa," the report read. Strong EU
weakens US. The EU and Israel have been at loggerheads for months
over the implementation of a Middle East peace plan and the construction of
Israel's security barrier. Israel also regards Europe
as a bulwark of pro-Palestinian sentiment and has long complained of what it
sees as growing anti-Semitism in Europe. The
report does send a strong signal to the Israeli government however, that,
faced with an EU which is ever more prominent on the international scene,
relations with Europe have to improve. The report also warns that influence
over world politics by the US, Israel's most important ally, could diminish
as the EU's role grows, German daily Berliner Zeitung reported on
Thursday. However, efforts are on to strengthen ties. The EU and Israel
recently concluded negotiations on a new bilateral agreement paving the way
for deeper relations between the two sides. EU officials believe "everything
besides EU membership" for Israel could be possible, according to
Berliner Zeitung. But diplomats described some aspects of negotiations
as tense."
Mitch
Bainwoal is a former Jewish Republican Party
official.
Ashcroft Vows Piracy Assault,
By Katie Dean, Wired, Oct. 14, 2004
"While the entertainment industry has had some recent setbacks in its fight
against piracy in the courts and in Congress, it has a new ally in John
Ashcroft, who recently pledged to make cracking down on copyright violators
a top priority. On Tuesday, the attorney general released a report from the
Department of Justice's Intellectual Property Task Force that outlines plans
to beef up enforcement of copyright violations. "With the recommendations
put forward by the task force, the department is prepared to build the
strongest, most aggressive legal assault against intellectual property crime
in our nation's history," Ashcroft said in a statement. Those
recommendations include increasing the number of FBI agents to sniff out
copyright violators, better training programs for prosecutors and law
enforcement officers who investigate such offenses, and increasing
cooperation between businesses and individuals affected by such theft. The
report -- which covers copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks and patents --
also says that those who benefit most from this theft "are criminals, and
alarmingly, criminal organizations with possible ties
to terrorism." Calling it "music to our ears," Mitch Bainwol,
CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America, praised the Justice
Department for making the prosecution of copyright violators a priority ...
Extra enforcement help from the Justice Department is unnecessary, and
should such recommendations be implemented, privacy will suffer, according
to Jason Schultz, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. In
the report, the task force suggests expanding wiretap capabilities for
authorities investigating intellectual property crimes that could affect
public health or safety. "This is the opening of the door," Schultz
said."This report shows that they want to use copyright infringement as a
mechanism for them to expand the scope of who they can snoop on. That's
obviously something that we're very concerned with."
The Calgary Herald is part of the Jewish Asper
family's media dynasty in Canada that has caused such outrage among Canadian
journalists
Feds to fight hate on web, says Cotler,
by Elizabeth Thompson, Calgary Herald (CanWest
News Service) October 12, 2004
"The federal government is preparing to introduce a sweeping round of
legislation that would combat the "explosion" of hate
sites on the Internet and outlaw human trafficking, "the new global
slave trade," Justice Minister Irwin Cotler says. He also
wants to encourage more police departments across Canada to set up their own
special hate crimes squads and for those squads
to work together more closely and better coordinate their efforts. "We have
to send out the message unequivocally, as a government and as part of our
shared citizenship and shared values, that our Canada is one in which there
will be no sanctuary for hate and no refuge for bigotry," he said in an
interview. "We will use all the panoply of remedies to bring that about.
Legal remedies, intercultural dialogue, promotion of multiculturalism,
anti-discrimination law and policy. A national action plan against racism."
This year has seen an increase in "both the incidence and intensity of hate
crimes," said Cotler, including the firebombing of the Talmud Torah Jewish
day school in Montreal and the torching of a mosque near Toronto. While
Cotler says Canada has "the most comprehensive legal regime to combat hate
of any comparable democracy," he says Canada can do more --
particularly when it comes to the Internet.
"Where in 1995 you had one hate site, today in 2004, 10 years later, we have
5,000 hate sites. You have had an explosion of
hate on the Internet." Traditionally, Canadian legislators have been
reluctant to tackle Internet content because the web's international nature
makes it difficult for any country to enforce its laws. Canada must work in
conjunction with other nations, the minister says. In addition to adopting
domestic legislation to fight "cyber hate,"
Cotler said Canada has to ratify the Council of Europe
convention on cyber crime as well as its optional protocol with respect to
combatting hate. Countries who adhere to the convention enter a framework
agreement concerning information sharing and law enforcement creating what
Cotler describes as "a culture of human rights to combat a culture of hate."
Here's
some old Internet "hate." Cotler wants free speech shut down.
Irwin Cotler -- Israel's main man in Canada's government, by Greg
Felton, Media Monitors, January 22, 2004
"Canada’s new justice minister and attorney-general is not what he
seems. Irwin Cotler’s much-vaunted career as an
international human-rights lawyer and ivy-league law professor matters less
than his reputation as a propagandist for Israel ... The most telling
evidence of the threat Cotler poses to Canada’s policy comes from his
support for the “new anti-Semitism”: “A new globalized, virulent
anti-Semitism juxtaposes with older forms. If classical anti-Semitism denied
the rights of individual Jews to live as equals in society, the new
anti-Semitism denies the Jewish People the right to live as equal members of
the Family of Nations.” First, “anti-Semitism” is a meaningless term of
insult, since it is used selectively to refer to bias against Jews, thus
making bias against fellow Semites (Arabs) acceptable. Second, and more
important, the “new anti-Semitism” is a subterfuge to de-legitimize
international condemnation of Israeli atrocities. In the abovementioned
article, Cotler identifies nine facets to this “new
anti-Semitism,” of which five are analyzed below ... The U.S. and
international Jewish lobbies enforce a moral double standard that insulates
Israel from having to comply with international law. The sharp international
condemnation of Israel in 2001 at Durban, South Africa, was a demand for
equality. If Cotler were a legitimate champion of human rights he would
denounce the Israeli-manufactured starvation in the Gaza Strip; the torture
of Palestinian detainees; dehumanizing checkpoint searches; and arbitrary
housing demolitions. Unfortunately, Cotler doesn’t deem the
human rights of Palestinians to be a major concern ... Israel’s pariah
status among the family of nations is entirely justified. Cotler’s
odious, falacious sophistries to the contrary show that he speaks for a
foreign government, and must therefore be expelled from Cabinet."
The Elephant in the Room of Empire.
Israel as Sideshow,
By BILL and KATHLEEN CHRISTISON, Former CIA analysts,
CounterPunch, October 12, 2004
"In the last year, there has been a rash of investigative films and in-depth
studies and analyses put out by progressive journalists and media outlets
that examine the U.S. drive for global hegemony and try to look at why
terrorists are targeting the U.S. These journalists and media outlets, the
very progressives who should best be able to "get it,"
have all totally or almost totally ignored the Israeli connection to the
Iraq war and to the various other Bush administration plans for the
Middle East: the much discussed possibility of an attack on Iran and its
nuclear capability, the possible plans to attack Syria, the so-called
"transformation" of the Middle East supposed to come about by foisting a
false democracy on it upon the wings of cruise missiles and B-52s ...
Hijacking Catastrophe actually gets close to the Israeli connection by
directly examining the neo-conservative plot to induce the fear in average
Americans that would serve as Bush's mandate for implementing the plans for
an invasion of Iraq that the neo-cons had formulated long before,
largely for the benefit of Israel. But this
film, as well as the others like it and the reports,
all stop just short of examining the Israeli connection to U.S.
war-mongering in the Middle East. These are all excellent exposés of
Bush administration empire-building and oil greed, but film after film and
investigative report after investigative report ignore one of the most
important strategic motivators for the Iraq war: Israel
and the effort to guarantee Israel's security by neutralizing its greatest
threat, which was Iraq under Saddam Hussein. The neo-cons are now
working on Iran, and you can bet that, if the U.S. attacks Iran, a year or
two hence when that war begins to go bad, everyone will
ignore Israel's connection to that one too -- even though, with Saddam gone,
Iran is now Israel's greatest threat ... The bottom line here is that virtually no one -- no
analyst, no moviemaker -- wants to touch the Israel issue.
You can't sell a movie like Fahrenheit 9/11 if you talk about Israel; you
won't have the same impact, and you certainly won't be able to make any
money, if you are seen to criticize Israel in any way, so better just to
ignore it. In actuality, it is impossible to get around the fact that
most of the neo-conservatives in this current administration, who wield a
great deal of influence over U.S. foreign policy, have long been active
supporters of Israel, even to the point of opposing past U.S. policy on the
peace process that went against the desires of Israel's right wing. It is
also impossible to get around the fact that many of the neo-cons happen to
be Jewish. But this is reality; in the surreal world of U.S. and Israeli
politics, you cannot bring this up. It is anti-Semitic,
you are told, to say that Jews have any power at all, because that
begins to sound like the old canards, which really were anti-Semitic, that
used to put forth a specious case for Jews trying to run the world. So no
one wants to touch the issue. The result is that the
moviemakers and commentators who mold public opinion too often steer away
from it. This is true even of progressive journalists who know the
realities. It is true also of virtually all politicians, most of whom
don't know the realities, with the blessed exception of Ralph Nader. It is
true of former diplomats. It's impossible to count on the fingers of two
hands the number of retired diplomats who, called upon in various public
forums to expatiate on U.S. policy toward Palestine-Israel, will spout
meaningless formulas or beg off entirely because the subject is too
sensitive, too dangerous, too set in the concrete determined by domestic
politics. As a result of this pervasive silence, public opinion comes to
think that Israel has no strategic influence on the U.S., that the U.S.
certainly wouldn't ever carry out any policy because of Israel or even in
cooperation with Israel, and that Israel's policies in the occupied
territories and its oppression of the Palestinians have no strategic impact
anywhere and could not possibly factor in to the reasons the U.S. is
targeted by terrorists or to the reality that most of the Arab and Muslim
world hates the United States because of its foreign policies and
particularly because it enables Israel's oppression of the Palestinians.
Israel is the elephant in the room of empire.
There is a vicious circle at work here: the less the media and politicians
discuss Israel-Palestine, the less knowledgeable and the less interested the
public becomes, and vice versa ... In fact, the
U.S.-Israeli relationship has grown so very close over the years that it is
almost impossible to distinguish whose policy, Israel's or ours, is being
pursued in the Middle East, and this is a reality that puts the United
States in grave danger. The U.S.-Israeli tie has been growing
steadily since well before there was an established state of Israel -- from
the time when the Zionist movement arose and won the support of much of the
American public and of early twentieth-century policymakers. But by now, the
political culture in the United States has turned so decidedly toward
support for Israel that any alternative view is almost
impossible to express. This is more true nowadays than at any time in
the past, and today the relationship is much more than a matter simply of
emotional sympathy for the plight of Jews or admiration for Israel's
accomplishments, much more than merely a matter of looking at the conflict
from an Israel-centered perspective. After decades of ever-solidifying ties,
Israel is now so closely linked to the United States in
concrete ways that it is actually a part of the U.S. military-industrial
complex. Israel sells military equipment, with our knowledge, to
countries to which the U.S. is restricted by law from selling -- for
instance, to China. So many arms and types of arms are produced in the U.S.
for Israel that it has become quite easy for Israel's lobbyists in
Washington to go to individual congressmen and point out to them how many
jobs in a given district depend on this arms industry and on not withholding
arms from Israel. In this way, Israel becomes a direct factor in sustaining
the U.S. military-industrial complex, in maintaining jobs in the U.S., and
in keeping congressmen and other politicians in office.
With the kind of pro-Israeli activists who people the policymaking ranks of
the Bush administration, it has come to the point that the U.S. gears much
of its foreign policy to furthering Israel's interests as much
or more than to furthering our own interests.
Bush policymakers have as little interest in actually resolving the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict as the voters in the Council on Foreign
Relations poll whom they are supposed to be leading;
their interest is in dealing with the conflict in whatever way Israeli sees
fit. One of the primary reasons we went to war in Iraq was to benefit
Israel. This reality is so frightening that it needs to be trumpeted
whenever motivations for the war are discussed. The United States'
own pursuit of global hegemony was obviously another major motivation, as
was oil, but U.S. and Israeli goals in the Middle East are so intertwined
that it is impossible to determine where a policymaker like Paul
Wolfowitz, for instance, or Donald Rumsfeld or the many
neo-conservatives in the Defense Department stop thinking of Israeli
interests and begin to think exclusively of U.S. interests. Policy and
policymakers are so closely interlinked that there probably is no such
point. This needs to be discussed loudly and often
... Everything Israel does in the Middle East is perceived throughout the
world, and accurately so, as having been condoned, encouraged, and enabled
by the United States, with the result that any terrorists able to concoct an
attack like September 11 will target us before they will target Israel.
Another problem is that the entire anti-war and anti-empire movement in the
U.S. is split on the question of policy toward Israel, and efforts to hide
this split are widespread. Two different arguments, both spurious, are made
in favor of continuing the cover-up. The first is that the U.S.-Israeli
relationship is simply not a major causal factor behind the U.S. invasion of
Iraq or the U.S. desire to concentrate its drive for global domination first
and foremost on the Middle East. Many Israeli and
American-Jewish peace activists firmly support this argument, and it cannot
be denied that many non-Jewish activists do also, although some of these may
do so at least in part for tactical reasons.
The second argument is completely tactical, and those who espouse it openly
recognize that fact. This argument alleges that unity in the U.S. peace
movement is important above all else, and that we will weaken the movement
irretrievably unless we ignore the controversial Israel-Palestine problem.
The fear is that media companies and publishers will refuse to distribute
documentary videos, films, books, and articles if we challenge establishment
positions on Israel and Palestine, and that fewer people will watch or buy
or read our documentaries and writings. The rationalization is often put
forward that there are so many other issues on which we can attack the
bellicose policies of the U.S. that it is really not even necessary to deal
with the particular hot potato of the American relationship with Israel."
U.S. Stresses Importance of Fighting Hate Crime, Collecting Data, U.S. Government, International Information
Programs
The head of the U.S. delegation to a European human rights conference said
October 12 that the United States supports "in the
strongest possible terms" the appointment of a
special representative on anti-Semitism for the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). Ambassador Larry Napper told the
OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting in Warsaw, Poland, that the
United States also supports the appointment of a second special
representative to coordinate efforts to combat racism, xenophobia and
discrimination ... [I]t is difficult to develop effective law enforcement
measures without accurate information, and thus participating states have
agreed to forward data on incidents of anti-Semitism
and other hate crimes each year to the OSCE's Office for Democratic
Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). "For countries that do not have
reporting systems in place, or whose systems are not comprehensive,
ODIHR is available to provide technical assistance,"
Napper said. He urged governments to "move quickly to create reporting
systems or address shortcomings in existing systems." Another member of the
U.S. delegation, Professor Frederick M. Lawrence, author of
"Punishing Hate: Bias Crimes Under American Law,"
also spoke on monitoring and responding to hate crimes."
U.S. Mission
to OSCE, U.S. government
"Statement on Humane Treatment of Detainees in the Ongoing War on Terrorism,
as delivered by Mr. Matthew Waxman, Deputy A/S for Detainee
Affairs, Dept. of Defense." ["Matthew
Waxman is the director of security and justice affairs in the
Washington, D.C. office of the Iraq Coalition Provisional Authority."
Top U.S.
advisers to address AIPAC meet,
By Nathan Guttman, Haaretz
(Israel), October 14, 2004
"U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and Richard
Holbrooke, chief foreign policy adviser to Democratic presidential
candidate John Kerry, will address an American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC) conference in Florida next weekend. The two will present
the key points of their respective candidates' foreign policy platforms on
the Middle East and Israel. It will be the first time a senior
administration official has appeared before AIPAC since
the media broke the story of an FBI investigation into suspicions that a
Pentagon employee, Larry Franklin, had passed classified information to
AIPAC officials, who in turn passed it on to Israel. According to
reports in the American press, Rice had actually been
informed of the ongoing investigation three years ago, but she, President
George Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell continued to make periodic
appearances at AIPAC events."
John Kerry on Israel:
The Record, NJDC,
October 14, 2004
"** Fact: The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has made note
of "Kerry's 100 percent pro-Israel voting record in the Senate" (Jewish
Telegraphic Agency, May 18, 2004). John Kerry has a
perfect, unblemished 20-year voting record on Israel in the United States
Senate -- including some 60 pro-Israel votes and signatures on key
congressional letters. He took a leadership role in cosponsoring many
of these efforts, dating back to his co-sponsorship of a 1987 resolution
disapproving missile sales to Saudi Arabia.
Israel's Security Fence:
** Fact: John Kerry has strongly supported Israel's
right to build a security fence. During a debate in February, he
described the fence as "a fence necessary to the security of Israel until
they have a partner to be able to negotiate" (New York Times transcript,
February 29, 2004). He has stated his support for the security fence
repeatedly in public forums, including during an April speech before
newspaper editors when he again said, "I support the building of the
security fence" (Speech before the American Society of Newspaper Editors,
April 23, 2004).
"We Should Never Pressure Israel:"
** Fact: John Kerry has repeatedly and clearly stated that a Kerry
Administration will never force Israel to take steps that compromise her
security: "And I want you to know that, as president, my promise to the
people of Israel is this: I will never force Israel to make concessions that
cost or compromise any of Israel's security. The
security of Israel is paramount. And we [are] an ally and we are a friend
and we have a special relationship, and we must remember that. We
will also never expect Israel to negotiate peace without a credible partner"
(Speech before the Anti-Defamation League, adl.org, May 3, 2004). He had
previously noted in a statement, "Our commitment must be clear: We should
never pressure Israel to compromise its security; never coerce it to
negotiate for peace without a credible partner; and always work to provide
the political and military support for Israel's fight against terror"
(Statement by John Kerry, April 27, 2004).
No Palestinian Right of Return:
** Fact: John Kerry has clearly noted his opposition to
any Palestinian "right of return" to Israel: "Now I think what the
President did in the last few days is to recognize a reality that even
President Clinton came to: if you're going to have a Jewish state, and that
is what we are committed to do and that is what Israel is, you cannot have a
right of return that's open ended -- you just can't do it. It's always been
a non-starter. I personally said that at a speech I gave to the Arab
community in New York at the World Economic Forum. I've said that. I've also
said that it is realistic because we know that at Taba they negotiated the
annexation of certain territory. So it's really stating a reality" (NBC's
"Meet the Press," April 18, 2004)."
Teresa Heinz
Kerry Speaks to Lion of Judah Conference, U.S. Newswire, October 16, 2004
"News Advisory: Teresa Heinz Kerry will visit Washington, D.C. on Sunday
October 17th to speak with women at the Lion of Judah Conference who are
involved in leadership and philanthropy in Jewish communities across the
country and the globe. Mrs. Heinz Kerry will focus her remarks on the
lessons she has learned as a philanthropist, and the invaluable contribution
that these women make to society through their generosity and hard work
giving back to their communities. The International Lion of Judah Conference
is a project of the National Women's Philanthropy of the United Jewish
Communities"
Statement by the Deputy Press Secretary, White House (United State Government), October
16, 2004
"On Saturday, October 16, 2004, the President signed into law: S. 2292, the
"Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004."
State Department Highlights Steps to Combat Anti-Semitism, U.S. State Department, October 16, 2004
"The State Department has undertaken a number of "specific and important
actions" to fight the scourge of anti-Semitism, according to a fact sheet
released on October. 15. The State Department fact sheet notes, among other
actions, efforts to encourage two OSCE conferences on combating
Anti-Semitism in Vienna and in Berlin. Secretary of State Colin Powell
addressed the Berlin conference. The United States also
has chaired the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust
Education, Remembrance and Research, "a group now comprising
18 countries that promotes understanding of the
Holocaust as a means to prevent a recurrence of the hatred that
resulted in that tragedy," according to the State Department."
Anti-Canada
loves Uncle Sam: Canadian resolve to keep health care, other values leaves
our US-modeled
neo-cons fuming.
by Linda McQuaig, Straight Goods, October 11,
2004
"There's been so much hand-wringing lately about the anti-Americanism that's
said to be afoot in the land that we've barely noticed a more worrisome
virus in our midst - anti-Canadianism ... I'm struck by the increasingly
fierce attempts to disparage Canada, or at least to disparage the pride many
Canadians take in the way we do things - a way that's sometimes different
than the way Americans do things. These attacks are
coming from a small but influential group of right-wing Canadian academics
and media commentators. Their theme song is that Canada is in
decline. They've been saying this for the past decade, but they've become
more strident lately. It seems they're frustrated that 9/11 didn't finally
push Canadians deeply into the arms of the United States. Just the opposite
has happened. The extremism of the Bush administration has left us,
according to polls, more wary than ever of American power and more
determined to stick to our way of doing things. This unexpected Canadian
resolve - most openly expressed in the Chretien government's wildly popular
decision not to join the US invasion of Iraq - has left the neo-con crowd
fuming. They got a chance to vent some of their anti-Canadian rage when a
number of them were interviewed for a feature article on Canada in the New
York Times last month. The Times presented Canada as a virtual cesspool of
despair over the sorry state of the country. "I'm in almost total despair,"
University of Toronto historian Michael Bliss told the
Times ... What seems to infuriate Bliss and the other
neo-conservatives is the value Canadians attach to social programs,
particularly public health care. "A country is not just a health system,"
scoffed military historian Jack Granatstein, also quoted in
the Times, who apparently feels the size of a country's military is a more
appropriate measure of greatness."
Russian
Parliament Blames Abortion on Jews, Israel National News, October 16, 2004
"Debate over a bill in the State Duma intended to ban the advertisement of
abortion services in Russia turned in a bizarre direction after a Communist
MP with a long history of anti-Semitic rhetoric blamed Jews for the high
number of abortions in Russia, according to the national daily "Gazeta” of
September 27. Nikolai Kondratenko, the former governor of Krasnodar Kray,
linked the abortion issue with his favorite topic, the
Jews and their supposed role in the "genocide" of ethnic Russians:
"Brothers, wake up, or you'll burn into ashes! It is everyone's duty to vote
for [this] bill. World Zionism is waging a merciless
war against us. On central television last night they said that 103
million of us, ethnic Russians, remain. This is genocide!"
Chai Signs For Jewish Senators,
by James D. Besser, Jewish Week, October 1, 2004
"Pro-Israel leaders are also following a number of Senate battles without
Jewish candidates. At the top of the list is South Dakota, where Minority
Leader Tom Daschle, a three-term incumbent, is facing a stiff challenge from
former Rep. John Thune. The national GOP has targeted Daschle, and the race
has been exceptionally bitter, especially on symbolic issues such as flag
desecration. Daschle, who will be majority leader on the off chance that
Democrats regain control of the Senate, has “been great
on Israel, and he’s getting his fair share of support from the pro-Israel
community,” said Morris Amitay, the political
activist.
More important, Daschle’s leadership status has made
him a key ally for pro-Israel forces. In Illinois, Barack Obama, a
charismatic black Democrat who wowed the Democratic National Convention this
summer with his keynote address, seems headed toward a blowout victory over
conservative Republican Alan Keyes, who lived in Maryland until he was
drafted to run in Illinois. Keyes may win some support from Jewish
conservatives who appreciate his vocal support for Israel, but Obama is
expected to run very strong in the Jewish community. “Obama
has good, strong positions on Israel, and there’s every indication he’ll be
a good friend,” said a top pro-Israel activist here. “Keyes
has been very good on Israel, but his very conservative domestic
positions are not likely to win him many Jewish votes' ... Jewish
immigration and refugee advocates were working their Capitol Hill contacts
this week in a last-minute effort to protect a law that
makes it easierfor Iranian Jews to get into this country as refugees.
The Specter-Lautenberg amendment,
originally passed to help Jews fleeing the former Soviet Union, was extended
in January to include Iranian Jews. Bureaucratic snafus kept the
provision from being implemented until August ... “We have every indication
of strong support for renewal,” Glickman said this week. “What
we don’t have control of is the budget process' ... Recently the
National Jewish Democratic Council placed ads in Jewish newspapers in
battleground states with significant Jewish populations, including Florida,
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
The NJDC ads focus on two themes: John Kerry’s support
for Israel and President Bush’s connection to the religious right.
Alliance breeds influence for Israel. Capitalizing on fierce support in the
United States and some deft political organizing, Israel has acquired unique
sway,"
By SUSAN TAYLOR MARTIN, St. Petersburg Times,
October 17, 2004
"During their debate on foreign policy, President Bush and Sen. John Kerry
wrangled over Iraq. They also tussled over Iran, North Korea and
Afghanistan. But except for two fleeting references,
there was no discussion of the issue that so often commands center stage:
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It was an omission that surprised
few experts.
"This is an area where both candidates, at least in their declared policies,
agree solidly," says Duncan Clarke, professor of
international relations at American University. "Both
of them have repeatedly stated their undying commitment to Israel and
Israel's interests' ... But the support has been deftly cultivated by
pro-Israel organizations, particularly the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee. Through an aggressive network of members,
lobbyists and friends high in the Bush administration, AIPAC wields a power
that keeps politicians toeing a pro-Israel line. The result: Israel
exerts a significant influence on U.S. foreign policy, especially in the
Middle East. A case in point is Iraq. Although protecting Israel was not the
only reason for invading Iraq, it clearly was a factor. Just days after the
Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush told several House members that the biggest
threat was not al-Qaida but "Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass
destruction." "He can blow up Israel and that would trigger an international
conflict," Bush said, as recounted in Bob Woodward's Plan of Attack.In
the past year, the administration has also backed off efforts to resolve the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict while appearing to give free rein to the
hard-line government of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. Critics
say the failure to push for peace is inflaming tensions
in the Mideast and hurting U.S. credibility. And while Israel is a
small nation (pop. 6.2-million) with one of the world's highest standards of
living, it long was the largest recipient of American foreign aid. It
dropped to second place this year only because of the huge sums allocated
for Iraq. Given the history of the two countries, the pro-Israel tilt of
U.S. foreign affairs is understandable. But while no one expects any sea
changes soon, there are signs of discontent with current policies, U.S. and
Israeli alike. "People are desperate to hear something different than just a
line," says M.J. Rosenberg, author of a widely read column
on American-Israeli relations. "After all, we're a pro-Israel organization,
but our bottom line is that peace is in Israel's best interest and American
involvement (in the peace process) is in America's best interest." Or as
Lewis Roth, spokesman for Americans for Peace Now, puts it: "Friends don't
let friends drive drunk. "It's all well and good for someone to say that
anything the (Israeli) government says is the right way to go when it comes
to Israeli policy. But if you're really a friend, you have to step back and
be more analytical about the path that Israel is actually taking." ... The
FBI is investigating whether a Pentagon analyst passed a classified document
about U.S. policy on Iran to AIPAC, which in turn may have given information
to Israeli officials. Israel and AIPAC deny wrongdoing, and AIPAC mounted a
counteroffensive: "Not only is AIPAC under attack - the U.S.-Israel
relationship itself is also under assault," the organization's leaders said
in a statement. But critics say the matter raises
questions about whether AIPAC has crossed the line between lobbying and
acting as an agent for a foreign government ... Despite the
criticisms, AIPAC enjoys strong backing from many American Jews, and there
is little evidence Congress is wavering from its pro-Israel stance.
By a 361-45 vote, the House recently passed a
resolution supporting Israel's controversial security fence. And this
summer, the House and Senate overwhelmingly approved
$2.6-billion in aid for Israel. Stephen Zunes, a Mideast expert at
the University of San Francisco, says the history of U.S. aid belies a
common perception: Israel needs huge amounts of money because it is weak
nation threatened by its Arab neighbors. Instead, more than 90 percent of
American aid has flowed since 1967, when Israel demonstrated its military
superiority over Arab armies, occupied the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and
began building the settlements that have complicated efforts to create a
Palestinian state. "The more dominant Israel has
become, the more aid it has gotten," Zunes says. "If we're really
concerned about Israel's survival, we would have given most of our aid in
the first years of existence when it was most vulnerable." Critics say some
of the money now going to Israel would be better used in countries like
Afghanistan, with five times as many people and far more pressing needs. A
reduction in aid could also hasten the Mideast peace process, some say. "Israelis
might have to learn to live with their neighbors, God forbid, if they're not
subsidized by Uncle Sugar," says Clarke of American University."
Kerry
Stepson: Jewish Lobby Too Powerful, Newsmax, November 1, 2004
"John Kerry's stepson, Chris Heinz, complained at a
recent campaign stop that Jews have too much influence on the U.S.
presidential election. "One of the things I've
noticed is the Israel lobby," the ketchup heir said, in quotes picked
up Sunday by the New York Post. Heinz complained that
Israel was being treated as "the 51st state, sort of a
swing state." In more overheated rhetoric first reported by
Philadelphia magazine, Heinz called Bush supporters "our enemies" and said
that if he ran his stepfather's campaign, the attacks on President Bush
would get even uglier. "We didn't start out with negative ads calling George
Bush a cokehead," Heinz reportedly explained before adding, "I'll do it
now." Asked later about the comment, Heinz turned sarcastic, saying: "I have
no evidence. He never sold me anything."
Jewish candidate's signs dumped at synagogue, Newsday, October 31, 2004
"Campaign officials for a state senate candidate have
alleged the latest incident over their campaign signs goes beyond vandalism
and is, instead, a hate crime. About 30 signs
supporting challenger Gayle Slossberg,
who is Jewish, were taken from lawns on private
property and dumped outside a local synagogue. Slossberg, a
Democrat, is challenging six-term incumbent Republican Win Smith for the
14th state Senatorial District. Both candidates have reported their signs
being stolen. "Although there have been some charges of vandalism of
campaign signs, I believe this is a purposeful act," said Amanda
Melpolder, Slossberg's campaign manager. "It's
hate-filled."
Archived for Educational Purposes only Under U.S.C. Title 17 Section 107
by Jew Watch Library at www.jewwatch.com
*COPYRIGHT NOTICE**
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in the Jew
Watch Library is archived here under fair use without profit or payment to those
who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for
personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only.
Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Archived for Educational Purposes only Under U.S.C. Title 17 Section 107
by Jew Watch Library at www.jewwatch.com
*COPYRIGHT NOTICE**
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in the Jew
Watch Library is archived here under fair use without profit or payment to those
who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for
personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes only.
Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml